Sep 23, 2019 Public Utilities Board on 2019-09-23 6:00 PM (Amended)

September 23, 2019 Public Utilities Board 33326

Meeting Details
Meeting Date: September 23, 2019
Board: Public Utilities Board
Video ID: 33326
Has Transcript: Yes
Has Agenda: Yes
AI Summary by Dentron 3000

Meeting Summary: Public Utilities Board Date: September 23, 2019 Location: City Hall, Denton, TX

Key Topics and Discussions - Consent agenda items addressing environmental compliance fees, professional services procurement, and wastewater infrastructure contracts. - Clarification that city engineering staff lack current capacity to perform tasks on the Solid Waste/Landfill professional services list. - Explanation of low bid response rates (15 responses from 750 solicitations) for RFQ 7109, attributed to broad electronic notification lists and non-responsive vendors. - Technical review of pipe bursting methodology for approximately 1,800 lineal feet of sewer line, including cost and disruption comparisons to traditional excavation. - Review of September 9, 2019 meeting minutes, with requested corrections to wording regarding dewatering equipment acceptance criteria and buried utility line documentation processes. - Assistant City Manager update on upcoming agenda items and proposed board facility tours. - Board request for data on public meeting viewership.

Motions, Votes, and Outcomes - Consent Agenda Item A (Consolidated Water Quality Fee ordinance): Motion carried. - Consent Agenda Item B (Solid Waste/Landfill professional services list ordinance): Motion carried. - Consent Agenda Item C (NO-DIGTEC, LLC pipe bursting contract ordinance): Motion carried. - Approval of September 9, 2019 minutes with editorial corrections: Motion carried. - Motion to adjourn: Carried.

Decisions Made - Approved ordinance authorizing expenditure of up to $127,000 for the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality annual Consolidated Water Quality Fee. - Approved ordinance establishing a pre-qualified professional services list for Solid Waste/Landfill operations (RFQ 7109). - Approved ordinance and contract with NO-DIGTEC, LLC for pipe bursting and related wastewater services, not to exceed $642,350. - Approved September 9, 2019 minutes with specified wording corrections.

Action Items or Next Steps - Staff to present updates on the energy center and multifamily recycling program at the next scheduled meeting. - Coordinate facility tour and orientation for board members, tentatively scheduled for October 23, 2019, with alternative dates available if needed. - Staff to compile and report metrics on public meeting viewership at the next meeting.

Agenda Chapters
1. 1. CONSENT AGENDA
0:08 - 0:32
2. B. Consider recommending adoption of an ordinance of the City of Denton, a Texas home-rule municipal corporation, for approval of a pre-qualified professional services list for Solid Waste/Landfill; and providing an effective date (RFQ 7109).
0:32 - 2:17
3. C. Consider recommending adoption of an ordinance of the City of Denton, a Texas home-rule municipal corporation, authorizing the City Manager to execute a contract with NO-DIGTEC, LLC, through The Interlocal Purchasing System (TIPS) Cooperative Program Contract # 171105 for the supply of pipe bursting and related services for Wastewater Utilities; providing for the expenditure of funds therefor; and providing an effective date (File 7165 - awarded to NO-DIGTEC, LLC, in the amount of $642,350).
2:17 - 5:21
4. A. Consider approval of the minutes of September 9, 2019.
5:21 - 7:44
5. B. Assistant City Manager Update 1. Future Agenda Items 2. Matrix
7:44 - 8:43
6. 3. CONCLUDING ITEMS
8:43 - 9:16
Transcript
1381 words
So let's call to order the September 23rd public utilities board meeting for the city of Denton. We have a brief agenda today Consent items a B and C Does any board member wish to pull one of the items? I have a question on B and B. Okay, and I have a question on C How about item a do we have a motion to approve Second all in favor say aye. Aye motion carries. Okay. I am B This is the question I had was those the of all the tasks that are enumerated here on this list There's a city of Denton engineering staff ever do those tasks No mostly because of capacity within the Not that they don't have the the ability and the training to do that because of the capacity and the work that they're currently working on now There's no free free time to be able to do that And since it's already been pulled I just had a question is out of 750 solicitations for bids you only had 14 responses. Is that typical actually only at we had 15 responses and one actually removed their Submission prior to today. So it's not atypical Wow, okay. Yeah, I Mean They don't want the work. Well, I'll give you an explanation what a lot of times happens is Businesses want to do business with the city and so they'll sign up to be notified of all solicitations, so it may be Carmen it could be anybody and so So when these go out, it'll go out to hundreds, but it may not be anywhere near in the business in which they do. So a Lot of times they're just not responsive because it's not in there But they just want to be notified of any and all good solicitations at the city And it's an electronic bidding system. It's electronic. So it's just goes to spam. Oh, okay. Yeah All right Do we have a motion to approve item B I move Second all in favor say aye. Aye that carries item C Charlie pulled see I didn't see my question is pretty brief. I just wanted if you could review The total feet that are involved and how that compares to just putting in a new sewer line Okay. Good evening board members Kenny bangs general manager of utilities the the overall Believe where we were at about 1800 square feet it was the bulk of the entirety of the project would be done by pipe bursting and then there was a small segment that was there towards the generally aligned with the The alignment of the access road for i-35 where that piece that was pipe burst will actually connect with a 15 go across that area and then Link up with another 15 that we have over near the tech stop property. That's right there beside i-35 So does that answer your question or well? I mean, I guess the second part so you're talking about 1800 ish Lineal fee that's correct. Okay, and how does that compare in cost to simply laying new sewer pipe? It's it tends to be quite a bit cheaper because you're not having to unearth it And so there's two two issues that are involved there one is the physical disturbance of having to actually unearth the old pipe Physically remove that pipe and then put new pipe in place Particularly with this area that that would be a pretty tall task. It goes by a hospital a drainage ditch There's a lot of pavement that's over Areas there. We've got a few small buildings that have been built in the easement So from a practical standpoint, it would be difficult to do it with a standard just unearthing and then bedding the pipe Secondly, it tends to be cheaper just because you don't have all of the equipment mobilization Excavators things of that nature that you need to actually Expose the pipe and then pull it out of the ground The way this process works is it's simply got a large device that goes into the pipe that is designed to Basically put pressure on the pipe. It has a large air compressor that acts almost like it For lack of a better word like an impact wrench and it basically will will break the pipe as it goes through It's guided by a cable We work manhole to manhole and then basically they pull the larger piece of pipe in behind it So it's it's pretty much an in situ Replacement you do have to on occasion Expose an area near the manholes just simply to give you access to be able to get the cable out But other than that, it's it's pretty non-invasive. So Generally, you're going to find that it's going to be much cheaper Particularly in a situation like this where you have a lot of pavement over the easement Thank you. Sure. I'll move approval All in favor say aye aye motion carries Okay items for individual consideration that prove approval of the minutes of September 9th Does anyone have any corrections or comments? Yeah, do you have a correction? These are fairly minor, but it's in reading this I hesitated to even bring it up and I thought no I need to correct this because Someone would would read that as it's written and say what idiot asked that question The first item is pub 19 - 165 when we're talking about the The dewatering equipment for the sludge The question I ask this is attributed to me is if there were acceptance criteria for the engineering of that new facility and it got translated as Reception of criteria Yes, so that was I can give you the exact wording here. Yeah, and The answer we got was yes, there is acceptance criteria for the third put acceptance. Yes And also for the desired moisture content that you want to end up with That was one thing and then on page four the top of page four the first line I Asked if there was a process for noting the actual location of buried lines on existing drawings Whenever a project is executed that involved digging in an area known to have buried utility lines that got translated as Asking asking how to identify utility drawings. Oh, yes And it's not quite the same so we can make those changes. Yeah. All right Then Do we need a motion to approve with those changes? Okay, do we have a motion to approve minutes with the changes suggested by mr. Baffert Barbara second all in favor say aye aye motion carries Assistant city manager update. Yes, make it fast You already blew my record Just a few things to report We will be coming next month to bring you some information about the energy center just updates on that along with a multifamily recycling One of the things that's coming in towards the end of October October 23rd, and I believe can make it if she hasn't already She will be reaching out to board members of the pub to see if you're interested in you doing any facility tours orientation So if she's done that that'd be great and love to have you all out come out to see our facilities and give a quick Orientation of kind of what all we do with your utilities and so October 23rd is that time and if there's some for some reason that we you all can do that Well, we can find off an alternative date too as well if we need to just wanted to pass that information on I have nothing else to report Which brings us to concluding items. Is there any items that a board member would like to have brought forward on the agenda in the future? I Do have one. I want to know the metrics of how many people view our meetings Sure, we can do that. We can bring some information to the next meeting. Okay Anybody else I Think this is a record. Do we have a motion to adjourn so we adjourn And you said okay, we're adjourned
Agenda
3 pages
City of Denton City Hall 215 E. McKinney St. Denton, Texas 76201 www.cityofdenton.com Meeting Agenda Public Utilities Board Monday, September 23, 2019 6:00 PM Work Session Room Amended After determining that a quorum is present, the Public Utilities Board of the City of Denton, Texas will convene in a meeting on Monday, September 23, 2019 at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Work Session Room at City Hall, 215 E. McKinney Street, Denton, Texas at which the following items will be considered: ANY FINAL ACTION, DECISION, OR VOTE ON A MATTER DELIBERATED IN A CLOSED MEETING WILL ONLY BE TAKEN IN AN OPEN MEETING THAT IS HELD IN COMPLIANCE WITH TEXAS GOVERNMENT CODE, CHAPTER 551, EXCEPT TO THE EXTENT SUCH FINAL ACTION, DECISION, OR VOTE IS TAKEN IN THE CLOSED MEETING IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF §551.086 OF THE TEXAS GOVERNMENT CODE (THE ‘PUBLIC POWER EXCEPTION’). THE PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD RESERVES THE RIGHT TO ADJOURN INTO A CLOSED MEETING OR EXECUTIVE SESSION AS AUTHORIZED BY TEX. GOV’T. CODE, §551.001, ET SEQ. (THE TEXAS OPEN MEETINGS ACT) ON ANY ITEM ON ITS OPEN MEETING AGENDA OR TO RECONVENE IN A CONTINUATION OF THE CLOSED MEETING ON THE CLOSED MEETING ITEMS NOTED ABOVE, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TEXAS OPEN MEETINGS ACT, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION §551.071-551.086 OF THE TEXAS OPEN MEETINGS ACT. REGULAR MEETING 1. CONSENT AGENDA Each of the items on the Consent Agenda is recommended by the Staff and approval thereof will be strictly on the basis of the Staff recommendations. Approval of the Consent Agenda authorizes the Assistant City Manager of Utilities, or his designee, to implement each item in accordance with the Staff recommendations. The Public Utilities Board has received background information and has had an opportunity to raise questions regarding these items prior to consideration. Listed below are bids, purchase orders, contracts, and other items to be approved for payment or other action under the Consent Agenda (Agenda Items A – C). This listing is pro…

... (truncated, showing first 2000 characters)

Back to Search