we're live. Okay. Thank everybody for coming and welcome. We'll open the meeting of the
Historic Landmark Committee Commission. Monday, September 21st, 2020. It's right at 3 p.m.
First of all, let me note that we do have five commissioners present via Zoom and now
six and we have, I think, Cassandra with us by phone. Is that right? Hi Cassandra. Hi.
That's correct. I'm by phone. Thank you. Okay. So noting that we do have, in fact, a quorum,
then we'll open the meeting. Let's start with the U.S. Pledge of Allegiance. I pledge allegiance
to the flag of the United States of America and to the republic for which it stands, one
nation, under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. And now the Texas Pledge.
Under the Texas flag, I pledge allegiance to the Texas, one state, under God, one nation,
indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. Okay. Thank you. The first, Lenny, have you
gotten our agenda in your email? Yeah. Katie sent it to me. Yes, I got it. Okay. The first
item on our agenda is HLC 20-034, which is a discussion of next year's calendar. In your
packet, you should have a calendar with the suggested dates. We do have the ability, I
think, to move those dates as long as it doesn't conflict. So if everybody can sort of check
their calendar, there are a couple that I would like to move, but, or Mary can jump
in or whoever. So in January on the 11th is our first, because these things are normally
scheduled the second Monday. Does anybody have a problem or a suggestion on that particular
day? I don't understand. What are you suggesting? Well, we need to look to the second Monday
in January would be the 11th. I will be out of the country on that particular day. So
I don't know that there's, I'm gone on the fourth and the 11th. So you guys can just
do, I mean, that's why we have a vice chair. So is the 11th okay? I was trying to find
my schedule for school. I'm just trying to think it may be the week before school starts.
I was just trying to dig up my... Where are you going, Roy? Someplace good at that. Oh,
it's my 40th wedding anniversary. Oh, congratulations. She's got plenty of time to wing me yet,
so maybe. I may go home tonight and the keys may not work, in which case, Lenny, I'm just
going to come say hi to you. You can put me on your couch. And so I'm taking her on a,
it's actually a bare boat charter in the Virgin Islands for 12 days. What is a bare boat charter?
That's where I'm the captain, as scary as that sounds. Oh my God. Cool. I've done it
probably 10 or 12 times. I've sailed all the way from Puerto Rico to South America driving
a boat. Cool. How big? Sorry. This one's 54 feet long. Oh, wow. But they've been as big,
as small as 38 or 39 feet have been the small. We don't want to lose Catherine. Okay. So
we're going to leave it on the 11th. The 11th works for me, Roy, because it's the first
day of classes, so I'm back. I just wasn't sure. I wanted to look at when spring break
was. Let's see. I can't. Spring break. So while that's happening, just real quick, the calendar
will be back as an item. It's the 8th of March, maybe? Spring break? Spring break. It's the
week before. So 15th is good too. We're good. Yeah, it should be on the calendar. But as
I was saying earlier, we will have to bring back an item for action. So this is more of
a discussion. So if you see anything that's conflicting or needs to be changed, just let
us know. So we're not going to vote to adopt this today. We're just looking at this. Correct.
Correct. This is an opportunity to start the discussion and to see a calendar, you know,
with the spring break, with the holidays, and also, you know, your schedules as well,
just to make sure that there's no dates that just doesn't make any sense. Well, I don't
know how other people have dates on their calendar anyway, since we're under lockdown
and I can't go anywhere. So we should be available, right? Yes. Well, I think the only problem
is, as soon as that lock comes off, I'm gone. I'm going to have, on April 12th, I would
probably ask if we could move that one. I'd rather move it up to the 5th than back to
the 19th, actually. So let's think about that. Sure. Okay. May is okay by me. April. Yeah,
some things are hard to get this far out, you know. A few are not, but. Okay. So let's
roll with Mary. Are there any other that are problems with you? Just. I did a quick look
and no, I mean, I have some potential travel, but you know, that's kind of tentative for
right now. Yeah. Janelle. I don't see any that are problematic right now. So. Ms. Lenny.
All I can say is as soon as I get my vaccine, I'm on the road. Okay. Evans here or something?
Yes, there he is. Yeah. Yeah. My Mondays are good. Okay. My Mondays are good for months.
Is Angie here? No, I don't see Angie. Okay. Melody here? No. Katie is here. Do you have
any? No. You may have a big conflict. If you get elected, do you have to get off of this?
I actually haven't been told. I've asked, I've sent messages and no response yet. So we'll
see. Cause Gerard is the one that appointed me. So I don't, I have no idea. Okay. Cassandra,
are you still with us by phone? I'm still with you and I don't foresee any conflicts
at this time. Thank you. Okay. So at this point, the only thing is perhaps a meeting
in April, if we could advance that to the fifth, but we'll, you guys can consider that.
Yeah. So we'll put that on the calendar for the next item for consideration. And just
for everyone, obviously we're meeting at three and that is the time that we've established
here at the city. So if anything changes, if that changes back to what it was before,
we will certainly let you know. But as of today, it is 3pm. Yeah. It's potential that
I might have to ask for later just cause I don't know my schedule right now. I don't
have a Monday teaching assignment. So that would be the same for me. I can begin the
meeting on the phone and end it on my computer, but I have to pick up my little girl from
school. So that's why I'm on the phone and I'll transfer to my computer once I'm home.
Okay. Okay. Like I said, once, once we have a better idea, hopefully it will go back to
normal hopefully. And we can go back to this date or the time that we had previously. Okay.
Next up on our agenda is, um, HLC 20 dash zero 40, which is approval of the minutes
from the July 13th meeting. Um, they are included in your packet. Um, any comments or do we
have a motion? I move approval. Second. Yeah. A motion and a second. Let me roll down the
roll call, uh, Mary Janelle Lenny. Aye. Evan. Aye. Angie is out. Melody's out. Katie Cassandra
approved. I was not present, but sorry, chair Cassandra hasn't completed her, um, her oath
yet. So she's just here to observe and just, uh, see how the meeting is run. And actually
I have completed my oath. I did that this morning and this afternoon. I just have to
get my, um, ethics training signature to city. So I got it in on time. Thank you. Okay. And
Roy's eyes. So we have one, two, three, four, five, six, seven eyes and two absent. Um,
so that, um, the approval of the minutes passes. So now we're going to move on to the public
part of our meeting where we will consider COA 20 dash 0 0 1 4, hold a meeting and consider
an application for a certificate of appropriateness in accordance with section 2.9.2 of the dent
development code to replace and construct a new public restroom building at 700 Oakland
street within Quakertown park, a designated Texas historical marker site. Ron Mengita
is going to do our presentation. I'll let you take it Ron. Thanks. Thank you, sir. Um,
thank you for the introduction. Again, this is a COA certificate appropriateness for the
Quakertown park restroom proposed building. Um, the site for the Quakertown restroom facility
will be at the Quakertown park, uh, at 700 Oakland street, uh, generally in the middle
of the, uh, the park itself. As you all know, Quakertown is a designated historic, uh, Texas
historic landmark site. The specific location is shown here. Um, it again, it is to replace
what was an existing restroom facility as well. So the parks department is requesting
this application for COA to construct the restroom facility over the same location as
the previous restroom facility. What is shown on the screen is a conceptual illustration
of what the building itself will look like. As you can see, again, it will consist of
um, restrooms, um, where the previous restroom facility is. So there will be no, uh, additional
impervious areas. Um, there'll be no trees removed. They will, again, it will just occupy
the same location as the previous building prior. Uh, just to help illustrate some of
the other, uh, historical buildings at the Quakertown park, civic center, senior center
and civic pool. And, um, the illustration that you saw prior is to, um, to be consistent
as close as possible to, to these existing buildings, uh, so that the Quakertown park
has a uniform, uh, uniformity as far as a building structure and architecture. Uh, with
that, um, the city, uh, staff is recommending approval of this COA, uh, to construct the
new construction of the new restroom facility building. Uh, again, they're at Quakertown
park. Uh, that concludes my presentation. I will be happy to answer any questions. Uh,
I'll just open the floor. You guys, uh, just plays in. Can you show the picture? Yeah,
real quick. Um, through Hoffman, um, director parks, assistant director of parks, uh, recreation
is also on, um, I guess the meeting and can answer questions as well. So let me go back
to the presentation. Is that the illustration you were looking for? Yes. Thank you. Thank
you. So I have a question. Um, so I was looking at, uh, the pool roof is like a blue standing
team metal roof. Is that going to be the same? Like, um, you see here, like, so is this,
that one would be the most similar, I think, in terms of, you know, what you're showing
us in the drawing that that pool entry building probably looks more similar to this than the
other two buildings. And so I'm wondering, is the roof going to be the same kind of blue
roof, um, to kind of tie it into the pool? No, man, we were going to pick more of the,
the cocoa color. If you go back to, uh, the civic center. So that color of a room, your
center that were the civic center. Oh, I see. Like this. Okay. Yes, ma'am. Okay. Is it going
to be the same kind of brick then as a civic center? Yes. So all the brick in all these
buildings were made by acne here in town. Yeah. And so they can, they have that on record
because we've built a number of signs with the same type of brick in the past. And so
when we order the brick for the building, it'll be, it'll be ordered from, from that
slot. Um, I was curious too. Is it a condition space like air conditioned and heated? No,
ma'am. It's open air. It's open air. So like in the picture that you had, the, those are
like little open air grills. They're not glass block. They are, they are glass block. What
you saw is glass block. And then there's open, there are open air louvers on the sides of
the building. Okay. All right. Can we go back to the picture of the building? And the glass
box just to provide lighting. Yes. To help, to provide extra lighting. Yes. And ventilation
also. Well, where's the ventilation then? The ventilation is on the side and it will
be on the side of the building. Do we have any other views of this other than the one
you have? No, ma'am. We didn't have a landscape architect, architect draw this up. What we
did is we did this as best as we could in house. And so what we've done is we've designed
each for these restrooms. They're all, uh, nine by nine. So they're fully ADA accessible.
They're, um, you know, neutral gender. They're large enough, you know, for, like I said,
for ADA capacity. And then it does have a small overhang for, to, for shelter during
weather. This building's also rated to 140 mile an hour winds. So it's not, it's not
a tornado shelter, but it is a, it will serve also as a storm shelter if needed. It kind
of looks not quite like the other things. The bricks looks very similar, but the roof
line looks different. I'm not an architect or whoever is here, but it seems different.
All the others seem to either present flat or tilted forward. And this one is in fact
angles this way. All the others look different. That's why I asked for other views. Yeah.
So what, what we did here is after looking through all our different building schemes
and different ways for us to put restrooms here, we were, um, we were directed by council
to build this in house. And so this is a Mueller building. And so it's a, it's a prefat, it's
not a prefab building, but it's a, it's a bolt together building there. You know, the,
all the piers and everything were built into the concrete and then we're, we're constructing
this building. It'll all fit together. And that with the metal and the thickness of the
metal, that's what gives us that 140 mile per hour wind rating. And of course we want
to coat this building. We want to veneer or you have a near it with the, with the brick
to give it the same architectural look that the rest of the buildings have. So what's
the footprint of the whole building? It's 41. I have it here on my screen. I can't remember.
You may have said, but it's 41 by 15 at 615 square feet, 41 by 15. Yes. So it's, it's
the exact same. It's the exact same size as the, the original restroom that was there.
It was in, it had fallen beyond disrepair and it was actually a hazard and therefore
we could no longer use it. And it didn't have what it was. It was, it was four concrete
walls with a concrete roof. There were, there was nothing architectural, you know, architectural
about it. It was just put in, in the 1950s is what we were told. And so we, we wanted
to go fully, we need a restroom in Quaker town. Really the biggest reason that us bringing
it here to make sure that you cared what it looked like, because the original restroom,
like I said, has no historical value or, you know, significance for this park, but we did
want to make sure that we brought this to, to the committee and showed you, you know,
if you, if you'd like, we would like to brick it. If you, if you don't want it to have any
kind of look of the other buildings, then we could either, you know, have it two toned
metal on the outside or we could, you know, do a number of different coatings on the outside.
I think it looks nice brick and the other one wasn't. So what did the other one look
like again? I sort of dark junk. It was just, it was not good. It was, it was solid. It
was, it was just concrete. It was flat concrete walls. And that's all I'm sure it was pretty
nasty and moldy. It was, it wasn't vented very well. And it only had, yeah, it only
had one, one women's stall and one men's stall with it, with a sink in each. And so this
one here will have, we, we designed it for four different stall, you know, four different
restroom facilities. And then we're adding, as you can tell in this picture, we're adding
water fountains to the front, the restroom, the restrooms before never had water fountains.
Well, I wish the, the roof line would come the other direction, but I hadn't realized
how narrow it actually was until just now. That's kind of narrow. So it doesn't work.
Okay. Any other questions for staff? Is there going to be any exterior lighting? Yes. Okay.
In fact, Quaker Town, the, the entire park is getting, getting lighting over this next
fiscal year. What's the other side of the roof? Like what are you planning for the underside
of the roof? Like the soffit? Like the parts that's dark gray right now. Yeah, it will,
it's metal soffit. Is it going to be one of these? And it matches the metal soffit that'll
be here. We've picked to match some other metal soffits over at the Civic Center and
Senior Center that are underneath their eaves. Is it going to be one of these self-cleaning
fancy London-style toilets? No, ma'am. Those are really expensive. Oh, okay. I mean, I
can't ever imagine using them. Any other questions for staff? No. I do have one more question.
So if the ventilation is just on the short side, how does it reach the, is there? There
are louvers in between each. In between each bathroom. And then it also has vent fans to,
vent out to the back of the restroom. Yes. To the back? Okay. Okay. All right. Well then
next up is we need a motion. Our options are to approve as submitted, to approve subject
to conditions, to deny or continue. Once we have a motion in a second, we can move on
to discussion. Move approval. I'll second. I know what the ugly ones looked like. All
right. So we have a motion in a second. I'll just throw the floor open for discussion amongst
the members or we can once again question staff if needed. I say yippee. I'm glad we've
got it. We've certainly have needed it, but I always worry about how it's going to be
kept. Exactly. But nevertheless, we have to have it. So I'm just surprised given that
eventually we might get back to normal, that we might need more stalls for all the festivals
and things that go on down there. Four seems a little short-sighted. I mean, you could
add another, you know, 15 feet and put in four more. I think they were trying to save
space. Yes. Trying not to use more space than had been used before. That and when festivals
come especially, you know, arts and jazz being our largest, we bring in multiple porter restrooms.
Stinky toilets. Yes. Wait, don't you bring in the ones for the trailer ones, the ones
on the trailer? Those aren't bad. That's not what they bring in. Oh, that's why I don't
go to the arts and jazz. The arts and jazz folks bring those restrooms in. We help facilitate
those, you know, those events and the arts and jazz, they actually run the events. Okay.
Any other discussion? Let's vote. We have a motion to second. Let's just vote. I'll
do a roll call just to make sure. Mary? Aye. Janelle? Um. You want us to come back to you?
Yeah, come back to me. Lenny? Yes. Evan? Aye. Angie and Melody are not here. Katie? Yes.
Cassandra? I think we'll have a slight delay. I'm yes. I know what the ugly ones look like
too, Ms. Lenny. I'm going to vote yes. So Janelle? I guess I'll vote yes. Okay. So we
have seven yays, zero nays, two absent. Thank everybody. Our next and last item on our agenda
is COA 20-015. Hold a public meeting and consider an application for a certificate of appropriateness
in accordance with section 2.9.2 of the Denton Development Code to install residential photovoltaic
panels on the roof of a house located at 2025 Houston Place within the West Oak Historic
District. The site is located on Houston Place between Thomas and Bradley Street. I believe
again Ron is doing the presentation, so I'll turn it over to him. Thank you sir. Yes. Again,
this is a certificate of appropriateness for solar panels on an existing home, which is
located at the West Oak Historic District. As you can see, the screen shows the boundaries
of the historic district. This particular home is located on Houston Place, just north
of Oak, and you can see where it is located. It's the longer, narrow lot that has the existing
home. The owner is Eugene Hargrove, and again, they are proposing to install solar panels
on this home that you see here. This is the front view. From this view, you will not be
able to see the solar panels. The solar panels are proposed on the east and the south side
of this home. This home is currently facing north. From a view further to the east, you
will be able to see where those panels will be located. Where you see the antenna there,
the solar panels will be along that panel or that side of the roof, side of that building
or that home. This is an illustration of where those solar panels are proposed. There is a
total of 25 solar panels, and again, you can see that a few of them will be located on
that eastern side plane of that roof, and this is where the antenna that we saw in the
earlier photo is located. So 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, and then the remaining 15
will be on the other roof plane, which is again facing south and does not have a public
view. The thin development code does have a section of the code, section 496C that pertains
to the West Oak Area Historic District, where it talks about skylights and solar panels.
Per the code itself, it says that the Historic Landmark Commission may allow skylights and
solar panels on a building if their placement does not have an adverse effect on the architecture
or other building or the district as a whole. With that consideration, staff is recommending
approval of this application for a certificate of appropriateness, again, to install solar
panels within the subject home 2025 Houston Place. That concludes my presentation. I'll
be happy to answer any questions.
>> Okay. I'll just open the floor. >> When was this home built, Ron?
>> I don't have that information, but based on the illustration, it does not look like
it's been a while. It obviously looks like more of a modern --
>> I looked it up, but it actually was built in 1994.
>> 1994, so -- >> I was guessing late '80s, so I'm close.
>> My question is, in the process of getting to today, did -- or what would be your impression
if we moved some of the east on the very far east wall, if we moved seven of those to the
other east roof, which is farther south, was that even considered, or is that appropriate?
If you left three or five on the other side, you might get the same sun, but yet be more
remote. But that was my only question, and I didn't know if that had come up.
>> That is a good question. Chair, I did not bring that up with the applicant, and I don't
know for sure if they're on the call or in the meeting participating. I did try to reach
out to them before the meeting, and it was not successful. We can certainly have that
consideration. Unfortunately, they're not here today, unless I'm mistaken. To answer
that possible reason why they did not include any into this section of the home, I can certainly
follow up. But for your decision today, I'll certainly take forward whatever the commission
decides.
>> I like what you say, Roy. I think it would be more fitting. I'm not a big fan of them
showing from the street no matter what, and I know the position of where this house sits.
It sits a bit on the high side, so that if you're coming, what is it, from east to west
on Houston Place, you will actually see them quite substantially, whereas if they were
just moved a little bit further to the back, it would be a lot better. It doesn't seem
to be a lot of trees around, so it doesn't seem like it should be a problem to do.
>> Okay. Do we have any other questions for staff members?
>> I think we've approved solar panels on several other houses fairly recently, haven't
we?
>> Yes, we tried to get them so they don't face the street, so they're not so ugly. They're
just not very attractive currently. I think the ones that made roof panels, they used
to make solar roofing, but that went away when they went after making solar battery
for cars. So the best we can do is kind of hide them a little bit from the view.
>> Yeah, it does look like you could, if they, like, looking at this, it looks like if they
have that fire setback that they have to have in the valley, they could get a few on the
back portion, and then the very back facing, that's facing the same direction as the back.
Yeah, it seems like they could probably get all of them between that side and that back.
>> I agree.
>> What are the green, there's a green, some green boxes with an arrow, is that where they're
locating the generator? Is that the air conditioning units or where they're locating the toll boxes?
>> Batteries maybe?
>> Yeah.
>> I wouldn't put my batteries right on the street, if you know what I mean, so easy to
steal. I'd be hiding them in the back anyway.
>> I'm not sure.
>> Lithium batteries are expensive.
>> Yeah, it doesn't say what the green boxes are. I don't see it.
>> Yes.
>> Okay. Any other questions for staff?
>> Ron, can I see the code again?
>> Sure.
>> Okay. Thanks.
>> Okay. So as a committee, we have four options. We can approve as submitted, approve subject
to conditions, deny or continue the item. If we take no action at all, I believe it becomes
approved in 45 days, Ron, is that right?
>> There is a day. I don't know if it's 45 days specific.
>> It's 90 days, I thought it was.
>> 90 days from the day of their application.
>> Mr. Chair.
>> Okay. So to move to discussion, we need a motion appropriate with one of these options.
>> Chair, real quick, legal has a response to the number of days.
>> Yes, ma'am.
>> Mr. Chair.
>> Yes, ma'am.
>> The C of A has to be approved within 75 days of the item, the date it's posted.
>> Okay. Thank you.
>> I'll make a motion. I would -- sorry, Lenny, do you have something?
>> No, I was just going to ask how could we approve with a possibility of something? Yes.
>> That's what I was going to try to suggest is I was going to make a motion that we approve
subject to them placing them further from the east facing wall towards the back so that
it's not quite as obtrusive on the overall neighborhood view.
>> Okay, Mary, that sounds like a motion. Do we have a second?
>> I'll second.
>> With the motion a second, now we can move to discussion.
>> Does that motion mean that if there's something that we have overlooked that caused them to
place them this way in the first place, that they won't have an option?
>> I'm looking at their plans that they submitted. It looks like the green boxes are labeled
electrical equipment, and that might be because it's close to the garage. It looks like that's
the garage. That's the only information that I can provide that may provide a reason why
they located there, but again, I'm not a solar panel expert, and maybe that can be relocated
to the other side of that and possibly be okay, but I'm not sure.
>> I was going to say, I think that we don't have the information. There's probably a reason,
but maybe where the main feed for their electrical comes into the house and to locate on the
back panels, they might have to run a whole lot more wiring. There may be some complications
we're not aware of as to why they located on that side.
>> Not my problem. They should have told me.
>> They may have told us staff, and it just not got --
>> Our condition could be that they work with staff to relocate as many on the southern
east-facing wall as possible, and then let our staff sort of work with them and see if
we can't move six or seven that way and then let the staff use their judgment. That could
be our condition is that we want to move as many of them as they can.
>> Or the west wall.
>> We can tell them to move them off.
>> The south wall.
>> The south eastern roof, yeah, the far --
>> Yeah, you don't want to just specify east. They could also put it on the back side too,
the south-facing side.
>> I think we all know what we're heading is move some of them to the other east-facing
roof on the south of the house. I guess we ought to ask legal if that's a valid condition
to a motion.
>> Mr. Chair, it seems to me that you can add conditions to the approval. I think it
would just be specific enough where the staff could convey that to the applicant.
>> Okay. Thank you. Okay. Now, discussion. That's fairly vague instructions to staff.
But if they came back and said we can't do it and here's our eight reasons, it's probably
going to get approved anyway. Am I -- I mean, that's sort of our history the last couple
of years is to approve these. I like the idea of asking them to move them. The question
is do you want to see them back here in a month?
>> I would think that we could let staff deal with it but highly suggest that it's so visible
and, you know, they're kind of -- I'm sorry. The panels currently are not designer-friendly.
They're not very attractive. That's the best I can say. And so they're so visible on that
east side. I've been up and down that street before. It would be nice if they just moved
them back and then all would be good. And sometimes what I found on here is that most
of the time people haven't thought like that, you know? Like one of the houses we did before
with the railing and the banister and the door, they just had some contractor come and say
this is it. And I think if you give them a chance, they might actually be amenable to
making it attractive. >> Okay. So --
>> We're comfortable with Ron and the staff working with them and trying to get it moved
a little bit because that way we're helpful but yet we try and get our -- and I guess
if they don't move any of them, we'll just know next time to agree to a vague condition,
not to agree to that. Okay. Fine. We have a motion and a second. Any further discussion?
>> I would only ask if the -- if our motion as it was stated will allow for that flexibility
and approval without further change. >> Yes, I believe so. That was a point of
the condition is to be flexible. Work with staff to move as many of the panels as practical
to the east-facing southern part of the roof. Any other questions?
>> I was just going to add, and I do this at almost every meeting, has anybody looked
at it on Google Maps? Or does anybody really know that street? Because --
>> I've gotten Google pulled up. What's the street address?
>> Is it 2025 Houston Place? >> I have. I've gone down Houston Place. And
what happens if you're coming from the east to west, there's a rise. And so it comes from
a low point up. And that's why those panels show so much is that they really -- they would
be right in -- kind of you'd be seeing them. I mean, some of them might be less shown,
but there's -- you know, I can remember when all it was was a pile of weeds at certain
points in front of that house. So I'm glad it looks so much nicer now. But there's no
trees around this. So it's not like that's going to be a block for them.
>> But I mean, you know, as to the question of is there an adverse effect on the architecture
of the building or the district, well, I mean, that street -- it's a 94 house anyway. And
so the solar panels aren't going to have an adverse effect on the architecture of the
building. >> It is in the district.
>> I don't think it's going to stick out at all. So I don't really have a problem with
this. >> It's in the district. The other houses in
that neighborhood are, in fact, much older. That is the sore thumb of the entire neighborhood.
In fact, it looks so different. It's the gray brick. It's so stark without trees.
>> Yeah, it is. >> Okay.
>> Yeah. The house itself has the adverse effect. So --
>> All right. Well, so let's -- we've had a motion in a second. Any further discussion?
Seeing none, Mary, your vote. >> Aye. I favor it.
>> Aye. >> Lennie?
>> Aye. >> Evan?
>> Aye. >> Angie and Melody are, I believe, still
absent. Katie?
>> Yes. >> Cassandra?
>> Aye. >> Cassandra, aye.
>> Aye. >> Roy is aye. So we have seven ayes, zero
nays and two absents. And so the motion passes.
And I believe that gets us to the end of our agenda for today. I don't -- I believe -- well,
do we need a motion to adjourn from legal? I don't know that we do or not.
>> I move to adjourn. >> Chair, if I can add one comment real quick.
Just want to give you all an update. The home that had the storm shelter that --
>> I was going to ask you about that. >> We postponed to a date certain. The applicant
actually withdrew their application. Therefore, there was no reason to bring it forward at
that time. So they decided not to do anything with that storm shelter at this moment. So
I just want to give you all an update on what happened. The other ones that were denied,
we have not heard back from the applicant. So we're still waiting. If anything changes,
they propose something different, then that will be a new COA for the HLC to consider.
>> Thank you, Chair. >> We had a motion and a second for adjournment.
Everybody in favor, just raise your hand. There are no opposed. So we stand adjourned.
>> My hand is up even though you can't see it. >> Yeah, you went away.