1 00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:07,640 Good morning. My name is Marty Rivers. I'm the chair of the downtown economic development 2 00:00:07,640 --> 00:00:13,960 committee. It's 833. We're going to call the meeting to order. And the first thing we will 3 00:00:13,960 --> 00:00:20,200 do is a roll call. So when I call your name, let us know that you're present. I'm just 4 00:00:20,200 --> 00:00:33,680 going to go around my screen here. Brock McKnight. Melissa Lindenburg. I need you to speak so 5 00:00:33,680 --> 00:00:49,840 people can hear. You might have to join audio, Melissa. Melissa's here. Bob Moses. I'm here. 6 00:00:49,840 --> 00:01:02,640 John Cartwright. Present. Monty Jensen. Here. Hank Dickinson. I am here. Beth Lewis. Here. 7 00:01:02,640 --> 00:01:11,960 Did I get everybody on the committee? I think so. All right. Thanks for being here today. 8 00:01:11,960 --> 00:01:18,160 It's nice to see some faces I hadn't seen in a while. And appreciate you logging in 9 00:01:18,160 --> 00:01:23,880 this morning and bearing with us as we go through this meeting on Zoom. Our first item 10 00:01:23,880 --> 00:01:32,520 up for consideration is EDP 20-021. Consider approval of the minutes of our March 5th, 11 00:01:32,520 --> 00:01:42,160 2020 meeting. And I will accept any motions or comments. I'll make a motion to accept 12 00:01:42,160 --> 00:01:51,640 that. I'm Bob Moses. Thank you, Bob. I'll second. We got a motion by Bob and a second 13 00:01:51,640 --> 00:02:03,360 by Monty. Any discussion on our March minutes? All right. All those in favor, say aye by 14 00:02:03,360 --> 00:02:08,640 raising your hand. Can you do the roll call because we can't see everybody? We've got 15 00:02:08,640 --> 00:02:26,320 to do a roll call. All right. Brock? Aye. Melissa? She said a thumbs up. Aye. Bob? Aye. John? 16 00:02:26,320 --> 00:02:37,240 Aye. Monty? Aye. Hank? Aye. Beth? Aye. I think we got everybody. Okay. Motion. Marty, this 17 00:02:37,240 --> 00:02:47,600 is Michael Talley as well. Aye. Hello. We've got a unanimous consent to approve the minutes. 18 00:02:47,600 --> 00:02:57,840 So we'll move on to the next item, which is EDP 20-002. Receive a report, hold discussion 19 00:02:57,840 --> 00:03:04,440 and make a recommendation to the downtown TURS number one board regarding a downtown 20 00:03:04,440 --> 00:03:11,720 reinvestment grant program application for 213 East Hickory Street, Hickory to Oak. And 21 00:03:11,720 --> 00:03:18,400 we have a special guest this morning, Eric Polito. I don't know if staff is going to 22 00:03:18,400 --> 00:03:25,000 make the presentation, I guess. Yes. Have everything in your backup as well. So I'll 23 00:03:25,000 --> 00:03:29,360 roll through the slides and then at the end we'll give you a chance to ask questions and 24 00:03:29,360 --> 00:03:51,240 then we'll talk about the scoring sheet, okay? Let me share my screen with you. There we 25 00:03:51,240 --> 00:04:03,680 go. So this will be our charges to consider making a recommendation to the downtown TURS 26 00:04:03,680 --> 00:04:10,240 board. Just wanted to quickly review with you all the parts of the project that when 27 00:04:10,240 --> 00:04:15,320 we review it, that's what we're looking for. So we want to look at for an increase in property 28 00:04:15,320 --> 00:04:21,640 valuation and sales tax, historical accuracy, improvements to water, wastewater, improvements 29 00:04:21,640 --> 00:04:28,200 to health and safety. It results in a significant increase in downtown population and other 30 00:04:28,200 --> 00:04:35,640 impacts that are not limited to partners with other businesses as a target business or promotes 31 00:04:35,640 --> 00:04:43,920 development of arts and entertainment downtown. Additionally, we'll look at facade rehabilitation 32 00:04:43,920 --> 00:04:48,680 and the new awnings and signs. That's where this one is going to follow is under the new 33 00:04:48,680 --> 00:04:57,880 signs. We also consider impact fee reimbursement, utility upgrades and interior code improvements. 34 00:04:57,880 --> 00:05:04,040 So this is the location of the property that we're looking at today. This is the proposed 35 00:05:04,040 --> 00:05:20,520 mural. So the mural is, as you can see, Day of the Dead. And it's the day of the most, 36 00:05:20,520 --> 00:05:24,920 I can't even say it today. I've been practicing all along and I can't say it, but it's for 37 00:05:24,920 --> 00:05:32,520 Day of the Dead and it embodies the coffin races that traditionally happened during the 38 00:05:32,520 --> 00:05:41,920 festival that happens on Industrial Street. They're also looking to add a metal and neon 39 00:05:41,920 --> 00:05:51,680 sign to the facade of the front of the building there. So back in, sorry, let me do this. 40 00:05:51,680 --> 00:05:59,160 In 2013, the property at 211 East Hickory was awarded a $10,000 grant for facade awnings 41 00:05:59,160 --> 00:06:04,280 and paint improvements. And recently, the three addresses have been pulled together 42 00:06:04,280 --> 00:06:11,400 and now part of one property. And so because of that, the current guidelines would allow 43 00:06:11,400 --> 00:06:16,960 for up to an additional $1,500 in grant awards for the property. The expenses submitted for 44 00:06:16,960 --> 00:06:25,200 the signs total $14,625. That's the estimated project costs and the grant request is for 45 00:06:25,200 --> 00:06:34,160 $7,313. So these are our options to either make no recommendation to the Downtown Tourists 46 00:06:34,160 --> 00:06:39,080 or make a recommendation to the Tourist Board in the amount equal to the scoring sheet guidelines. 47 00:06:39,080 --> 00:06:46,480 And so I did attach the scoring sheet for you. I won't require them, but we're going 48 00:06:46,480 --> 00:06:58,840 to try something different this year. But first, let's go to questions. So does anyone 49 00:06:58,840 --> 00:07:10,440 have any questions for Eric? I have a question. Who is going to do the sign? Is it a student 50 00:07:10,440 --> 00:07:17,100 or is it someone that's done other art around the city? I'd just like to know a little bit 51 00:07:17,100 --> 00:07:26,360 about who's actually going to perform the art? Yes. The mural has already been completed 52 00:07:26,360 --> 00:07:32,000 and it was done by Dan Black, who as you may know has done a lot of murals around town 53 00:07:32,000 --> 00:07:38,560 and around the world now. So it's kind of cool that we're getting to use him for that 54 00:07:38,560 --> 00:07:45,280 mural. I also, before we had done that, had talked with David Pierce, who heads it up 55 00:07:45,280 --> 00:07:50,920 Day of the Dead Festival and they really celebrated us doing that mural on that street. So it 56 00:07:50,920 --> 00:07:59,120 seemed like it was a really champion thing by those involved. Mural's up and the sign 57 00:07:59,120 --> 00:08:03,520 was put up over the weekend. Yes, the sign just got put up and that was done by Mellow 58 00:08:03,520 --> 00:08:13,080 signs. Okay, I'll have to get down the street and see what it is. I haven't seen it. Okay. 59 00:08:13,080 --> 00:08:19,600 Any other questions? I have a question. When do you think you might be open for business? 60 00:08:19,600 --> 00:08:27,440 That's a good question. It's a tough one because we're still now working to finish and get 61 00:08:27,440 --> 00:08:37,440 a CO, but as a lot of you guys know, it's a tough one because opening might just be 62 00:08:37,440 --> 00:08:41,320 more difficult than not being open. So we're kind of waiting to see a little bit more of 63 00:08:41,320 --> 00:08:47,680 a light to appear. But we're excited to get it there and then we're going to do everything 64 00:08:47,680 --> 00:08:53,400 to be ready to be open. There was a pause obviously, but now we've kind of dug back 65 00:08:53,400 --> 00:09:15,760 into finish the inside and everything, get our CO. Any more questions? Okay. So what 66 00:09:15,760 --> 00:09:19,120 I'd like for you to do is to go ahead and take a look at your scoring sheet and fill 67 00:09:19,120 --> 00:09:28,300 it out and then text me your score with your last name. So I have my number listed up there 68 00:09:28,300 --> 00:09:34,960 on the top for you. And then once you've done that, I'll calculate the average score and 69 00:09:34,960 --> 00:09:38,720 then we'll move forward from there. 70 00:09:38,720 --> 00:09:51,960 So you just gave your cell phone out to thousands of people watching this program this morning? 71 00:09:51,960 --> 00:09:53,680 Yeah, sure. 72 00:09:53,680 --> 00:09:58,680 No, that's actually not Christina's real cell phone number. That's a system that we have 73 00:09:58,680 --> 00:10:06,120 set up for this exact purpose. So thank you. But Christina will respond to anyone who texts 74 00:10:06,120 --> 00:10:15,720 that number, I think I will. 75 00:10:15,720 --> 00:10:21,520 I'm still working on it. I had to go get a pen, but I'm going to be I've never done the 76 00:10:21,520 --> 00:10:30,680 texting while I do this. So I'm going to be giving you an anonymous number in a minute. 77 00:10:30,680 --> 00:10:36,600 Christina, where is your cell number featured here? 78 00:10:36,600 --> 00:10:40,760 Sorry. Yeah, I got you. 79 00:10:40,760 --> 00:10:46,720 Oh, do I just punch that text number and be able to punch in a number? 80 00:10:46,720 --> 00:10:51,680 Yeah, text, put that number in to text to it and then just write your last name in the 81 00:10:51,680 --> 00:10:54,720 message and your total score. 82 00:10:54,720 --> 00:11:01,080 I guess I don't know how to go into text and not lose this connection here. So I'll be 83 00:11:01,080 --> 00:11:14,320 a dummy and give you a number in a minute. 84 00:11:14,320 --> 00:11:29,720 While we're doing that, I got a text from Alex this morning. He had something come up 85 00:11:29,720 --> 00:11:44,960 all of a sudden that he was unable to make it 86 00:11:44,960 --> 00:12:03,080 22. Gang, I got to get on the road again, but I should be back to a stationary location 87 00:12:03,080 --> 00:12:23,960 shortly but I'm going to go off video for a minute. 88 00:12:23,960 --> 00:12:37,400 I need my Michael Talley and there's rocks right there. 89 00:12:37,400 --> 00:12:54,320 Thank you, Brock. 90 00:12:54,320 --> 00:13:23,040 So I have Margie, Melissa, oh, thank you. 91 00:13:23,040 --> 00:13:29,580 Christina, did you get mine? 92 00:13:29,580 --> 00:13:54,200 I did get yours. Thank you. 93 00:13:54,200 --> 00:14:10,040 Okay, are we missing any scores? Is anyone still sending? If not, we'll have Christina 94 00:14:10,040 --> 00:14:31,760 total it. Okay, I received Marty, Melissa, Hank, Monty, Brock, Michael and Beth. 95 00:14:31,760 --> 00:14:45,040 Don, do we have yours? I sent it. 940-220-9015? 96 00:14:45,040 --> 00:14:59,720 I think it's 51. Oh, is it dyslexia? Tell me the number again. 940-220-9051. 97 00:14:59,720 --> 00:15:06,280 Someone got a fun text message from John. 98 00:15:06,280 --> 00:15:07,280 Yeah. 99 00:15:07,280 --> 00:15:18,640 I guess we need to all get some teenagers to come in and help us while we're doing this. 100 00:15:18,640 --> 00:15:19,640 About now. 101 00:15:19,640 --> 00:15:20,640 Okay, got it. 102 00:15:20,640 --> 00:15:22,800 Thank you, ma'am. 103 00:15:22,800 --> 00:15:28,000 So if we want, we can move on to the next presentation while Christina is totaling the 104 00:15:28,000 --> 00:15:30,320 scores and come back to this item. 105 00:15:30,320 --> 00:15:32,120 Let's do that. 106 00:15:32,120 --> 00:15:37,000 Okay. Marty, do you mind going a little bit out of order and I'll allow Todd Essis and 107 00:15:37,000 --> 00:15:43,680 Engineering to do their presentation before mine that way, which is agenda item D. 108 00:15:43,680 --> 00:15:51,160 Yep, let's do that. EDP 20-028, receive a report, hold discussion and give staff direction 109 00:15:51,160 --> 00:15:58,440 regarding one-way versus two-way streets in downtown Denton. 110 00:15:58,440 --> 00:16:05,640 Good morning. We're actually going to have Brian Yahn, who is speaking remotely. I'll 111 00:16:05,640 --> 00:16:09,960 move the slides forward, but if we get a little bit of a lag, then I'll jump in and we'll 112 00:16:09,960 --> 00:16:15,480 go from there. Brian definitely explains it better than I do. And I also tell Brian, you 113 00:16:15,480 --> 00:16:18,600 better tell them what you want to tell them because otherwise you're going to live with 114 00:16:18,600 --> 00:16:22,320 what I tell them, which is never, never really a good thing, I think. 115 00:16:22,320 --> 00:16:26,120 Never. It's never a good thing. 116 00:16:26,120 --> 00:16:36,920 All right. I'll let you start the slide. Can you hear me, Todd? Okay. 117 00:16:36,920 --> 00:16:50,840 So good morning, everyone. My name is Brian Yahn. I'm the City Traffic Engineer for Denton. 118 00:16:50,840 --> 00:16:56,600 I'm here to talk to you today about one-way and two-way streets. And I want to clarify, 119 00:16:56,600 --> 00:17:02,760 if you had seen the first slide, I had originally titled this one-way versus two-way streets, 120 00:17:02,760 --> 00:17:08,560 but it's not really a competition. Both our tools and the toolbox, they each have their 121 00:17:08,560 --> 00:17:15,800 place. And so we're really here today to talk about pros and cons, the characteristics of 122 00:17:15,800 --> 00:17:22,840 each, and just have a discussion on the four streets, Oak, Hickory, Elm, and Locust, and 123 00:17:22,840 --> 00:17:29,080 how they should, how the community wants them to function in the future. So this slide, 124 00:17:29,080 --> 00:17:32,980 are two-way streets better than one-way streets? If you ask two traffic engineers that question, 125 00:17:32,980 --> 00:17:40,520 you're going to get three answers. Next slide, please. Yes, no, and maybe. So it's this maybe 126 00:17:40,520 --> 00:17:46,000 that's in the middle ground where it says it depends, but I want to focus today, because 127 00:17:46,000 --> 00:17:51,320 it really does depend. Next slide, please. It depends on the goals of the community and 128 00:17:51,320 --> 00:17:58,480 how they want these streets to function and live within the community itself. Topics we 129 00:17:58,480 --> 00:18:05,680 really want to cover today are safety, economic vitality, mobility, and congestion. So we 130 00:18:05,680 --> 00:18:11,000 want to look at how the pedestrian and bicycle safety is improved or are not improved, the 131 00:18:11,000 --> 00:18:16,640 vehicular crashes. We want to look how one-way streets and two-way streets change the access 132 00:18:16,640 --> 00:18:24,560 to businesses, affect the travel distances that customers and consumers have to experience. 133 00:18:24,560 --> 00:18:30,320 City options. What are the bike-ped facilities options? How do they affect transit and how 134 00:18:30,320 --> 00:18:36,320 do they affect parking? And then congestion, which is how most of us interact with our 135 00:18:36,320 --> 00:18:41,280 city streets, and that's typically in our vehicle. Does it add delay? Does it improve 136 00:18:41,280 --> 00:18:48,160 the flow? What are the speeds like? And if we have the congestion, does it force people 137 00:18:48,160 --> 00:18:52,280 onto parallel facilities where we really don't want a lot of through traffic? It's that cut 138 00:18:52,280 --> 00:18:58,840 through traffic that we often hear about. Next slide, please. So first topic is safety. 139 00:18:58,840 --> 00:19:05,040 Next slide. So this is the format I'm going to pursue this entire presentation. One-way 140 00:19:05,040 --> 00:19:08,800 streets will be on your left, two-way streets will be on your right. So one-way streets, 141 00:19:08,800 --> 00:19:11,280 pedestrians have the advantage. If you're crossing the main street, you only have to 142 00:19:11,280 --> 00:19:15,480 look in one direction because theoretically there's not supposed to be a car coming from 143 00:19:15,480 --> 00:19:19,480 the other direction. So that's kind of an advantage. On two-way streets, if you have 144 00:19:19,480 --> 00:19:24,400 a four-leg intersection with two-way streets coming from all directions and you've got 145 00:19:24,400 --> 00:19:28,360 a few more options or requirements where you have to look left, right, left again, like 146 00:19:28,360 --> 00:19:34,920 we learned when we were children. Next slide, please. On one-way streets, one of the disadvantages 147 00:19:34,920 --> 00:19:39,840 is that as pedestrians cross a multi-lane one-way street, if you can see in the picture 148 00:19:39,840 --> 00:19:44,840 on your left, pedestrian is stepped off the curb, but that second vehicle on the right-hand 149 00:19:44,840 --> 00:19:49,960 side of the screen can't see them yet. So a lot of times that's a conflict where one 150 00:19:49,960 --> 00:19:54,280 car will stop, the other car sees the car stop and doesn't know why and keeps going. 151 00:19:54,280 --> 00:19:59,680 And then we have the potential for a crash with the pedestrian or cyclist in that crosswalk. 152 00:19:59,680 --> 00:20:04,440 Two-way streets, you've got only one, if we're talking about a two-lane street, which most 153 00:20:04,440 --> 00:20:11,240 of the four that we're looking at are typically two lanes, we're looking at a scenario where 154 00:20:11,240 --> 00:20:15,480 you've got much better visibility, you've only got one car and one lane, so the pedestrian 155 00:20:15,480 --> 00:20:21,520 is in a much safer environment. Next slide, please. One-way streets typically will have 156 00:20:21,520 --> 00:20:27,840 much fewer conflict points, which leads to a lower crash potential. So a one-way main 157 00:20:27,840 --> 00:20:32,360 street with a two-way side street, you've got 20 conflict points for motorists and ped 158 00:20:32,360 --> 00:20:37,640 bike. On a two-way street, you've doubled that, you've got 40 conflict points, more 159 00:20:37,640 --> 00:20:45,100 opportunities for crashes and mistakes. Next slide, please. One-way streets, because they 160 00:20:45,100 --> 00:20:50,640 don't have that friction of head-on traffic, somebody coming at you, the potential for 161 00:20:50,640 --> 00:20:55,480 the motorists coming in the opposite direction can lead to higher speeds and that leads to 162 00:20:55,480 --> 00:21:02,680 the potential for higher severity of crashes. So you have fewer but more severe crashes. 163 00:21:02,680 --> 00:21:07,480 On a two-way street network, typically we'll see lower speeds because you've got the at 164 00:21:07,480 --> 00:21:11,140 least the potential for somebody to be coming at you in the other direction, lowers the 165 00:21:11,140 --> 00:21:17,880 speeds and also lowers the severity of crashes. Now as a follow-on, because we saw the previous 166 00:21:17,880 --> 00:21:22,280 slide, we've got twice the number of high conflict points. We've got, you typically 167 00:21:22,280 --> 00:21:28,120 will see a 30% bump in the number of crashes. There'll be fewer, there'll be fender benders, 168 00:21:28,120 --> 00:21:34,960 lower speed, less severe, but the actual number of crashes typically will rise. Next slide, 169 00:21:34,960 --> 00:21:40,520 please. So this is just a little accident history on the two couplets that we're talking 170 00:21:40,520 --> 00:21:46,000 about. Oak and Hickory on the top, west is on your left and east is on your right. So 171 00:21:46,000 --> 00:21:55,560 you'll see that we've got fairly consistent crash. This is from 2010 to 2020, 617 crashes, 172 00:21:55,560 --> 00:22:00,040 zero fatalities and 110 injuries and fairly evenly distributed east and west throughout 173 00:22:00,040 --> 00:22:07,800 the entire corridor. Very few segments have really, really low. You can see a couple on 174 00:22:07,800 --> 00:22:16,320 Oak and Hickory about two, three blocks west of Carroll, where we've got some lower crash 175 00:22:16,320 --> 00:22:22,640 volumes, but throughout the corridor, pretty consistent. On Elm and Locust, and I apologize 176 00:22:22,640 --> 00:22:26,280 for this, but north is to your right. It's just, there's no way I could format this on 177 00:22:26,280 --> 00:22:34,320 the slide deck, but you'll see that downtown, quite a few crashes and when you get up to 178 00:22:34,320 --> 00:22:40,040 university, quite a few crashes. But in that middle distance, and again, this is 2010 to 179 00:22:40,040 --> 00:22:46,640 2020, this is 10 years where the data in that, you know, between downtown and university, 180 00:22:46,640 --> 00:22:53,040 it dropped significantly. You get 1,087 crashes, so almost 1,100 crashes, two fatalities and 181 00:22:53,040 --> 00:22:58,680 362 injuries. So that's just a little bit of crash history for these two corridors. 182 00:22:58,680 --> 00:23:06,480 Next slide, please. Next topic we're going to talk about is economic vitality, and how 183 00:23:06,480 --> 00:23:13,720 the characteristics of one-way and two-way streets can affect that. Next slide. So one-way 184 00:23:13,720 --> 00:23:18,520 streets are harder for visitors to navigate. If we live in the community, typically we'll 185 00:23:18,520 --> 00:23:23,880 know which streets are one-way, and if I need to go from point A to point B, I've got to 186 00:23:23,880 --> 00:23:28,920 go here, take a left and turn right or turn left again. But for visitors, it's not nearly 187 00:23:28,920 --> 00:23:35,200 as common-sensical. They don't know which streets are going to be one-way. Is it one 188 00:23:35,200 --> 00:23:41,200 street? Is it two streets? Is it four streets? And that's taken away when you've got a two-way 189 00:23:41,200 --> 00:23:48,280 street grid. So you can travel in any direction on any street, and it allows for just easier 190 00:23:48,280 --> 00:23:55,640 access for those visitors. Next slide. The other characteristic of a one-way street network 191 00:23:55,640 --> 00:24:01,380 is that it will typically increase the distance you have to travel. And I've just used if 192 00:24:01,380 --> 00:24:06,120 someone's coming from the east on University and they want to go to Giuseppe's downtown, 193 00:24:06,120 --> 00:24:11,400 this is my example. The orange would be the one-way street where you've got to come down 194 00:24:11,400 --> 00:24:18,720 Elm, turn and come back north on Locust, versus if both streets were two-way, you would simply 195 00:24:18,720 --> 00:24:23,960 turn on Locust and get to your destination. So depending upon the street grid and where 196 00:24:23,960 --> 00:24:28,640 you're trying to go in that grid, it can significantly increase the travel distance, which is something 197 00:24:28,640 --> 00:24:34,040 that we try to avoid. It's more emissions, it's greater opportunity for crashes. So if 198 00:24:34,040 --> 00:24:39,760 we can shorten the travel distance, that's a win. Next slide. All right. We like to talk 199 00:24:39,760 --> 00:24:45,920 a little bit about mobility. Next slide. On a one-way streets, one of the, and you can 200 00:24:45,920 --> 00:24:50,360 see this as an advantage or just a characteristic, but if you're on a one-way streets, you only 201 00:24:50,360 --> 00:24:55,040 need a bike lane in one direction. If you're on a two-way streets, the expectation is that 202 00:24:55,040 --> 00:25:00,760 you have a bike lane for each direction. So it kind of doubles that need for bicycle infrastructure. 203 00:25:00,760 --> 00:25:08,840 And just as a caveat, one of the foundation points of this discussion is that we're not 204 00:25:08,840 --> 00:25:13,160 talking about reconstruction. So if we're talking about converting any of these streets 205 00:25:13,160 --> 00:25:18,940 from one-way to two-way, we're leaving the curves in place. So we've got a finite distance 206 00:25:18,940 --> 00:25:22,600 of pavement. So it's really all about what do we do with that pavement? What are our 207 00:25:22,600 --> 00:25:28,760 goals? What's most important? If bike facilities are high on that list, then a two-way street 208 00:25:28,760 --> 00:25:34,940 can impact the rest of the remainder of the pavement, because if that expectation is satisfied 209 00:25:34,940 --> 00:25:41,680 of having a bike lane in each direction, we've used twice as much. Next slide. 210 00:25:41,680 --> 00:25:48,800 So on a one-way street, if, and this is really talking about two different categories, deliveries 211 00:25:48,800 --> 00:25:54,040 and then, and it doesn't seem like it would be the natural pairing, but transit operates 212 00:25:54,040 --> 00:26:01,520 very similarly. If you've got a two-way, a two-lane, one-way street, then if a delivery 213 00:26:01,520 --> 00:26:07,740 truck or a transit vehicle needs to stop to unload cargo or passengers, they're going 214 00:26:07,740 --> 00:26:13,640 to block a lane. There's just no way we can avoid that. So if you've got a one-way, two-lane 215 00:26:13,640 --> 00:26:18,920 scenario, you've got a bypass lane. So the vehicle will just, if you're behind that transit 216 00:26:18,920 --> 00:26:24,340 vehicle, that delivery vehicle, you have the opportunity to change lanes and move forward. 217 00:26:24,340 --> 00:26:28,320 On a two-way street network, where you've got that same amount of pavement, you've got 218 00:26:28,320 --> 00:26:32,600 two lanes and now you've got one in each direction, if a transit vehicle or a delivery vehicle 219 00:26:32,600 --> 00:26:39,960 needs to stop and unload, they take the entire lane and typically it's not safe or you may 220 00:26:39,960 --> 00:26:46,000 not have the opportunity to get around it. So that's a significant consideration of how 221 00:26:46,000 --> 00:26:53,400 we want to maintain our, or manage our congestion, because that can lead to some significant 222 00:26:53,400 --> 00:26:57,880 additional delays if you've got a lot of deliveries or a lot of transit stops in a corridor that 223 00:26:57,880 --> 00:27:05,440 you've converted from one-way to two-way. Next slide, please. So on-street parking may 224 00:27:05,440 --> 00:27:11,040 limit or preclude on-street bike facilities. So this is just something that is, again, 225 00:27:11,040 --> 00:27:16,120 and we'll talk a little bit more about parking later in the presentation, but it's just, 226 00:27:16,120 --> 00:27:20,320 again, we're dealing with a finite amount of pavement. We're not going to reconstruct, 227 00:27:20,320 --> 00:27:26,760 so it's the same curb to curb that we've got today. And it's all about the choice of what 228 00:27:26,760 --> 00:27:30,760 we want to put in that pavement. Is parking more important? Is bike more important? Is 229 00:27:30,760 --> 00:27:36,240 transit more important? These are all decisions that need to be made and weighed prior to 230 00:27:36,240 --> 00:27:45,680 that conversion. So next slide, please. Congestion. Next slide. So one-way streets provide up 231 00:27:45,680 --> 00:27:52,120 to 50% more lane capacity. A lot of that is due to the friction that we talked about. 232 00:27:52,120 --> 00:27:56,560 You get more throughput when people don't have to worry about a car coming at them from 233 00:27:56,560 --> 00:28:02,720 the other direction. You've got fewer delays associated with left turns, because all the 234 00:28:02,720 --> 00:28:07,120 turns off of the main street are free. So you don't have to wait. If I'm on a one-way 235 00:28:07,120 --> 00:28:10,520 street and I want to turn left, I get in that left lane and I turn left. I don't have to 236 00:28:10,520 --> 00:28:15,880 wait on anybody. It allows for greater vehicle throughput, but again, that's that two-edged 237 00:28:15,880 --> 00:28:23,880 sword. It can lead to faster vehicular speeds and that more intense, more severe crash history. 238 00:28:23,880 --> 00:28:30,120 A two-way street network provides less, and I'll call this capacity or throughput, because 239 00:28:30,120 --> 00:28:34,640 again, as we saw earlier, those number of conflict points are much higher. And if you 240 00:28:34,640 --> 00:28:39,560 want to make a left turn from a two-lane, two-way street, you've got to wait for that 241 00:28:39,560 --> 00:28:44,720 gap between traffic in the opposite direction to make your left turn. So very much like 242 00:28:44,720 --> 00:28:50,360 a delivery or a transit vehicle, when that left turn is happening and there's traffic 243 00:28:50,360 --> 00:28:54,960 coming the other direction, everybody behind that vehicle has to stop and wait. So that's 244 00:28:54,960 --> 00:29:04,360 again, it adds to delay, adds to some perceived congestion. Next slide, please. Very, very 245 00:29:04,360 --> 00:29:09,360 much a follow-on point. The increase in efficiency for vehicular flow, that progression, even 246 00:29:09,360 --> 00:29:14,400 if you're in a corridor with signals, with one way and you can think about Elm on Locust 247 00:29:14,400 --> 00:29:20,320 or Oak and Hickory, we can time those signals so that because there's no left turn conflict 248 00:29:20,320 --> 00:29:24,280 there's nobody coming in the other direction, we can time them so that as you get to that, 249 00:29:24,280 --> 00:29:27,320 as you approach the next signal, it turns green. And as you approach the next signal, 250 00:29:27,320 --> 00:29:33,480 it turns green. On a two-way street, those left turns will typically hinder that progression. 251 00:29:33,480 --> 00:29:40,760 Now, you can still achieve it, but not nearly to the same extent. Next slide, please. This 252 00:29:40,760 --> 00:29:46,920 is an important concept for people who may not be using those roadways, but might live 253 00:29:46,920 --> 00:29:54,720 adjacent to them. Because we've got this one-way configuration that's able to carry more efficient 254 00:29:54,720 --> 00:29:59,840 flow of traffic, may have higher vehicular speeds, it's much more attractive for people 255 00:29:59,840 --> 00:30:05,600 who are simply going from point A to point B to stay on those roadways. If we convert 256 00:30:05,600 --> 00:30:09,460 those to two-way and start increasing that congestion, increasing that delay, the left 257 00:30:09,460 --> 00:30:15,680 turns are kind of clogging stuff up, deliveries may be blocking lanes periodically, what we 258 00:30:15,680 --> 00:30:21,360 see is that people will find, even though it may not be truly faster, it is perceived, 259 00:30:21,360 --> 00:30:26,560 they perceive that they are saving time by cutting through. And a lot of times, unfortunately, 260 00:30:26,560 --> 00:30:30,120 this is through a neighborhood. So a lot of the residential streets, there are a lot of 261 00:30:30,120 --> 00:30:35,160 residential areas that are parallel or adjacent to these corridors, we'll see an increase 262 00:30:35,160 --> 00:30:38,680 in what they call cut-through traffic. And that's something that we typically try to 263 00:30:38,680 --> 00:30:44,480 avoid because those areas, we'll see a higher pedestrian, a lot of especially younger age 264 00:30:44,480 --> 00:30:50,640 pedestrians, kids using the street to go from house to house, and it puts those pedestrians 265 00:30:50,640 --> 00:31:00,960 at greater risk. So next slide, please. So these are some slides just from our mobility 266 00:31:00,960 --> 00:31:08,360 plan, our 2045 model. And it just, it wants to show you what the impact of conversion 267 00:31:08,360 --> 00:31:13,500 from the one-way grid that we have today to a two-way grid on those four streets. And 268 00:31:13,500 --> 00:31:18,200 if you look at this, these are all one-way. And so about where the cursor is, you can 269 00:31:18,200 --> 00:31:23,960 see where Elm and Locust and Carroll and then Oak and Hickory. We've got about, and I'll 270 00:31:23,960 --> 00:31:29,440 start with Oak and Hickory, about 18,000. And Todd, if you can just, I'm going to do 271 00:31:29,440 --> 00:31:32,640 Oak and Hickory and then we'll toggle to the next one and we'll toggle back and then we're 272 00:31:32,640 --> 00:31:37,160 just going to jump back and forth so we can look at two corridors at a time. Yeah. So 273 00:31:37,160 --> 00:31:47,000 there, okay. 17,900 jumps up a little bit to 20,000. And then, but in the middle, if 274 00:31:47,000 --> 00:31:52,480 you'll look, so stop here for a second, this is two-way. You've got 3000 on Oak and 1300 275 00:31:52,480 --> 00:31:58,800 on Hickory. Jump to the previous slide. And this is the one-way configuration. Those volumes 276 00:31:58,800 --> 00:32:05,520 are significantly higher. And what that shows us is as we increase or as we convert the 277 00:32:05,520 --> 00:32:13,040 one-way streets of Oak and Hickory to two-way, that introduced congestion, that delay associated 278 00:32:13,040 --> 00:32:18,540 with the left turns is enough to drive a significant portion of those vehicles, those motorists, 279 00:32:18,540 --> 00:32:29,840 two parallel facilities. In that area, that's very residential. So a lot of those houses 280 00:32:29,840 --> 00:32:34,600 that are roadways parallel to Oak and Hickory are going to see an increase in traffic volume 281 00:32:34,600 --> 00:32:40,880 because Oak and Hickory are no longer as convenient and comfortable and attractive to travel. 282 00:32:40,880 --> 00:32:46,600 So let's look at all one-way. I'll stay on this slide. Elm and Locust. So you'll see 283 00:32:46,600 --> 00:32:52,880 about 15 on the north side, north of University, 15 to 17,000 vehicles a day. And it's pretty 284 00:32:52,880 --> 00:32:59,480 consistent through the corridor, 18,000 and down 17,000 in downtown. Carroll is about 285 00:32:59,480 --> 00:33:08,960 40, jumps to 46, and then 47 to 48 south of downtown. So let's go to the two-way slide. 286 00:33:08,960 --> 00:33:15,640 So here you see the migration. Elm and Locust are significantly down, up to 35%, 40% lower. 287 00:33:15,640 --> 00:33:24,800 And they've all moved to Carroll. So as you see, the Carroll went from 44 and then 42, 288 00:33:24,800 --> 00:33:30,240 which is again, we're seeing some migration off of Elm and Locust. May not make it to 289 00:33:30,240 --> 00:33:33,420 Carroll, but may make it to some parallel facilities where we really don't want that 290 00:33:33,420 --> 00:33:39,640 traffic. So that's really the point of this is I wanted you to see numerically the magnitude 291 00:33:39,640 --> 00:33:45,600 of that potential diversion, that migration from the primary corridors where we really 292 00:33:45,600 --> 00:33:49,400 want those vehicles, we can accommodate them, we can handle them, we can make the progression 293 00:33:49,400 --> 00:33:55,440 work, and we can address safety issues, versus when we get them into parallel facilities 294 00:33:55,440 --> 00:34:01,880 that may only have stop control, we may not be able to accommodate and manage that traffic 295 00:34:01,880 --> 00:34:08,880 to the same level. So let's move on. Next slide, please. 296 00:34:08,880 --> 00:34:13,280 So this is the last slide before I want to open it up for discussions. And this is just 297 00:34:13,280 --> 00:34:22,640 a little bit about parking, because parking, again, plays that role of it serves the function 298 00:34:22,640 --> 00:34:28,080 of a lot of the older parts of town that didn't provide a lot of off street parking, relied 299 00:34:28,080 --> 00:34:32,840 on on street parking, but parking also limits what we can do with that existing pavement. 300 00:34:32,840 --> 00:34:37,760 Again, we're not widening. So we're looking at the existing curb to curb distance and 301 00:34:37,760 --> 00:34:41,960 how we manage that and what's the highest and best use for that pavement. Parking is 302 00:34:41,960 --> 00:34:47,000 certainly one of those choices. So again, we talked about parking may conflict the bike 303 00:34:47,000 --> 00:34:52,640 facilities. And if we have parking on both sides of a two way street, probably not going 304 00:34:52,640 --> 00:34:59,240 to have room for a dedicated or separated bike facility. We're going to have the bikes, 305 00:34:59,240 --> 00:35:05,160 it's going to be a shared lane, which is not really the level of safety that we're trying 306 00:35:05,160 --> 00:35:09,560 to provide citywide. Just a little bit about different kinds of 307 00:35:09,560 --> 00:35:14,520 parking. Parallel parking offers the greatest flexibility. It allows one way or two way 308 00:35:14,520 --> 00:35:20,160 doesn't really matter how you enter that. However, it doesn't provide the same quantity 309 00:35:20,160 --> 00:35:26,480 of parking spaces. So if we convert angle parking to parallel, we're going to lose significantly. 310 00:35:26,480 --> 00:35:30,920 But we're going to get rain some we're going to one gain some pavement. And we're going 311 00:35:30,920 --> 00:35:36,000 to gain some flexibility as far as how we use that pavement. Again, the angle parking 312 00:35:36,000 --> 00:35:41,040 requires almost twice as much as one way and typically will limit it to one side. So typically 313 00:35:41,040 --> 00:35:47,480 angle parking is linked to a direction of travel, like exception would be the reverse 314 00:35:47,480 --> 00:35:57,240 angle back in parking that we have on McKinney, excuse me, McKinney Hickory, east of Locust. 315 00:35:57,240 --> 00:36:07,000 We can we can convert formerly angle parking into reverse angle parking. However, the popularity 316 00:36:07,000 --> 00:36:12,600 that is yet to be determined. And then the last point is if a roadways converted 317 00:36:12,600 --> 00:36:17,160 two way operation, angle parking may need to be adjusted without current modifications. 318 00:36:17,160 --> 00:36:22,360 And if we do that, so if we if we flip the direction and you look around the square where 319 00:36:22,360 --> 00:36:30,240 we've got angle parking and it's it's set for like eastbound directions, if we converted 320 00:36:30,240 --> 00:36:34,920 that to a two way roadway, we'd want to flip the angle if we wanted to maintain heading 321 00:36:34,920 --> 00:36:39,960 parking on the north side of Hickory. And what that does is without if we're not going 322 00:36:39,960 --> 00:36:45,320 to modify the way those curb islands are built, we're going to lose five to 10% of our parking 323 00:36:45,320 --> 00:36:51,520 supply just in the restriping. So that's the last slide. I've got some some discussion 324 00:36:51,520 --> 00:36:55,160 on recommendations, but what I'd really like to do and the reason we're here today is to 325 00:36:55,160 --> 00:37:03,760 get your input before we really set our recommendations, we want to we want the feedback from this 326 00:37:03,760 --> 00:37:12,240 group as to how you think the conversion from one way to two way would impact the downtown 327 00:37:12,240 --> 00:37:18,360 area. And if there are pros and cons, if there are concepts or ideas, that's what we'd like 328 00:37:18,360 --> 00:37:22,120 to hear from you today. So I'm going to open it up. I'll stop talking and I'll open it 329 00:37:22,120 --> 00:37:26,060 back up to the group. And we'll just take your feedback from here. So thank you very 330 00:37:26,060 --> 00:37:34,080 much. Thank you, Brian. If anybody would like to ask questions or give provide some feedback, 331 00:37:34,080 --> 00:37:38,880 raise your hand and I will try to call on you. We might want to have that screen back 332 00:37:38,880 --> 00:37:47,160 up and go go back to a couple of those slides if that's that that's possible. We can we 333 00:37:47,160 --> 00:37:51,480 can do that. Everyone will be small on the screen. So it might be harder for you to see 334 00:37:51,480 --> 00:37:56,880 him Marty. But if I see him on my bigger screen, I'll let you know. I think John had his hand 335 00:37:56,880 --> 00:38:03,680 up. Yes, sir. Good morning, everybody. Full disclosure, we had a presentation of Main 336 00:38:03,680 --> 00:38:11,280 Street Association, I guess around a month or so ago. A lot of the feedback that we had 337 00:38:11,280 --> 00:38:19,560 was, everybody was kind of interested in it. But some of the comments were that it it, 338 00:38:19,560 --> 00:38:22,760 it seemed like something to take on right now that we're just trying to get through 339 00:38:22,760 --> 00:38:28,760 it and, and maybe put it off to next next year. But there was one interesting comment 340 00:38:28,760 --> 00:38:36,600 that it does seem arbitrary, even to local residents, let alone visitors to downtown 341 00:38:36,600 --> 00:38:41,720 about the one way and two way streets. It's it's two way on East Oak and East Hickory, 342 00:38:41,720 --> 00:38:49,160 but it goes to one way on West Oak and West Hickory. But I think I love the idea that 343 00:38:49,160 --> 00:38:56,840 changing Elm and Locust to an East, a West Oak and West Hickory to two way. Is it possible, 344 00:38:56,840 --> 00:39:05,020 Brian, that if we were to make the all the all the streets that are coming to the square 345 00:39:05,020 --> 00:39:10,800 two way and then when you get to the square, it's it's like a large roundabout where you 346 00:39:10,800 --> 00:39:16,680 can only turn right to get on the square. We keep the square itself one way around. 347 00:39:16,680 --> 00:39:20,480 So all streets leading to the square, you would turn right. And if you wanted to get 348 00:39:20,480 --> 00:39:24,680 to the other side of the square, you would just like a large roundabout. We keep the 349 00:39:24,680 --> 00:39:30,800 parking the same. We keep the two, the two lane one way for deliveries. And so we never 350 00:39:30,800 --> 00:39:37,720 we don't have that option obstacle rather. But I just wanted to get your thoughts on 351 00:39:37,720 --> 00:39:43,000 making the square itself a large roundabout and converting all the streets leading to 352 00:39:43,000 --> 00:39:50,400 it two way. OK, so my response is certainly 100 percent. My parents grew up and still 353 00:39:50,400 --> 00:39:55,460 live in a small town in south Texas that has a square just like that. All the streets leading 354 00:39:55,460 --> 00:40:01,440 up to the square two way and then leaving the square two way. But the square is a it's 355 00:40:01,440 --> 00:40:07,400 a counterclockwise roundabout exactly as you described. So that's that is a historical 356 00:40:07,400 --> 00:40:13,160 example of how we can treat the one way interface with the two way. And I will say that I like 357 00:40:13,160 --> 00:40:21,600 that concept better than the current way that Hickory intersects Locust. When you have in 358 00:40:21,600 --> 00:40:26,980 that outside on the north side lane, you know, you're facing west as you're coming from from 359 00:40:26,980 --> 00:40:32,840 East Hickory and then you've got a car facing you in the same lane that is eastbound coming 360 00:40:32,840 --> 00:40:40,360 from West Hickory. That's just it's hard for the traffic engineering to deal with because 361 00:40:40,360 --> 00:40:44,680 it's you've got two cars that want to use the same lane and it's not it's not necessarily 362 00:40:44,680 --> 00:40:50,120 a safe. So what you're describing is something that is at least in Texas has been a historical 363 00:40:50,120 --> 00:40:56,280 practice and certainly is an option we can we can look into. Yeah, we just the south 364 00:40:56,280 --> 00:41:00,920 south Elm and south Locust Street are very wide streets. And I think having those two 365 00:41:00,920 --> 00:41:06,720 lane to excuse me two way there's enough room for either putting parallel parking all the 366 00:41:06,720 --> 00:41:11,640 way down or certainly enough room for two bike lanes coming from the from the south 367 00:41:11,640 --> 00:41:18,640 to the square. And the the added benefit of having south Elm two way is that when you're 368 00:41:18,640 --> 00:41:24,720 coming down Fort Worth Drive and you're wanting to get to the square, you turn right on I 369 00:41:24,720 --> 00:41:31,240 guess that I don't know what that street is right there where the you turn right off of 370 00:41:31,240 --> 00:41:39,040 Carroll to is that eat? Well, no, before Eagle, what's that where the day laborer pickup is 371 00:41:39,040 --> 00:41:43,320 for work drive? Yeah, I guess you just turn right on Fort Worth Drive and then you can 372 00:41:43,320 --> 00:41:47,880 go straight across Eagle on an Elm to get to the square instead of having to turn right 373 00:41:47,880 --> 00:41:52,480 on Eagle and then left on Locust just get up north on the square. I think there's a 374 00:41:52,480 --> 00:41:58,120 lot of benefit to that. But I personally I like the idea of just keeping the square one 375 00:41:58,120 --> 00:42:22,880 way as it is. Bob. You're on mute. Bob. Bob, you're on mute. Unmute. Okay, can you hear 376 00:42:22,880 --> 00:42:31,760 me now? Yep. Okay, I agree with john for another reason. We're already so congested around the 377 00:42:31,760 --> 00:42:38,880 square. And, of course, we get the comments about no parking, etc, etc, all the time people, 378 00:42:38,880 --> 00:42:44,800 the merchants and whoever has a business on the square. I think going to parallel parking 379 00:42:44,800 --> 00:42:51,360 around the square and the dual lanes for the bikes just exacerbates that problem. I think 380 00:42:51,360 --> 00:42:57,180 you need to stay with the diagonal parking, which gives us more parking. It's faster. 381 00:42:57,180 --> 00:43:01,720 You don't have the congestion backup that you would. So I agree with the concept that 382 00:43:01,720 --> 00:43:13,320 john just explained. Thank you. Monty. We'll start with a geometry lesson real quick. You 383 00:43:13,320 --> 00:43:17,700 can't call something that's one way on the square a roundabout. It would be a square 384 00:43:17,700 --> 00:43:23,240 roundabout. Just a little technicality there. I'm not a meteorologist or anything, but I'm 385 00:43:23,240 --> 00:43:31,800 pretty sure you can't make a square round. I think the problem that we have with the 386 00:43:31,800 --> 00:43:35,960 one way streets, and I think we addressed it as really as much as anything a safety 387 00:43:35,960 --> 00:43:42,200 issue. I've been to a couple of the police downtowners meetings over the years, and I 388 00:43:42,200 --> 00:43:50,200 think they've from I guess it's eagle to the square. They've clocked people 5560 65 miles 389 00:43:50,200 --> 00:43:57,000 an hour on that road and people see, you know, those two lanes as basically a short term 390 00:43:57,000 --> 00:44:04,360 Autobahn three lanes, three lanes, right? I think I've had Congress, Alex, Alex came 391 00:44:04,360 --> 00:44:09,440 to what pain came to one of our meetings and I think, you know, he actually would be an 392 00:44:09,440 --> 00:44:14,920 advocate on some of those roads is of potentially more congestion. And what I mean by that is 393 00:44:14,920 --> 00:44:20,760 actually choke those roads down to fewer lanes if they're going to stay one lane and put 394 00:44:20,760 --> 00:44:26,280 parking on either side of them. You know, his point is a lot of those places in there 395 00:44:26,280 --> 00:44:31,080 inhibit business in that they're sort of a parking desert on a couple of those that's 396 00:44:31,080 --> 00:44:38,300 not except for private parking. But I really think the state the heart the more people 397 00:44:38,300 --> 00:44:43,880 go past a business on a one way street, the more people go past a business and they miss 398 00:44:43,880 --> 00:44:48,160 a parking spot or they miss the address and they realize they have to go all the way around 399 00:44:48,160 --> 00:44:53,420 the island to get back to where they came from. I think you start to get a frustration 400 00:44:53,420 --> 00:44:59,200 factor. I think that frustration factor leads to a speed factor and that speed factor leads 401 00:44:59,200 --> 00:45:04,880 to a safety factor. When I look at the stats on the one way streets, there's three times 402 00:45:04,880 --> 00:45:10,280 as many injuries on those one way streets. There's a hundred and a little more than 150% 403 00:45:10,280 --> 00:45:14,640 of the accidents. And there's two deaths and we can say, well, it's only two deaths. But 404 00:45:14,640 --> 00:45:17,660 I'm pretty sure if you went back and asked those two people, they would say for them 405 00:45:17,660 --> 00:45:26,720 it was fairly consequential. I just think I just think that the harder to get we as 406 00:45:26,720 --> 00:45:30,480 a business owner, the harder you make it to get, you know, I always say the moon may be 407 00:45:30,480 --> 00:45:34,600 a nice place to visit, but it's hard to get to. So nobody goes there. And the harder you 408 00:45:34,600 --> 00:45:39,920 make a business to get to the more moon like it becomes. And I see all of the advantages 409 00:45:39,920 --> 00:45:45,240 of the one way, but I think the harder to get to factor and the speedway factor for 410 00:45:45,240 --> 00:45:50,800 me outweigh any sort of advantage that you get from the faster throughput, because I 411 00:45:50,800 --> 00:45:57,920 think that faster throughput actually gets mitigated in a lot of ways, um, just by people 412 00:45:57,920 --> 00:46:01,800 will be going fast. They'll miss where they're going, particularly those visitors. Now they 413 00:46:01,800 --> 00:46:06,280 or they accidentally went right past the parking space and they've got somebody behind them. 414 00:46:06,280 --> 00:46:09,280 And now they've got to go all the way around the block and they know darn well that space 415 00:46:09,280 --> 00:46:12,200 won't be there when they get back. 416 00:46:12,200 --> 00:46:24,600 Well, am I still alone or do I need to unmute? You're on. Okay. Well, Monty, I would agree 417 00:46:24,600 --> 00:46:30,520 with what you're saying with exception of the square. Um, I would go with, with the 418 00:46:30,520 --> 00:46:35,920 two lane, the two way traffic on, off the square. But I think on the square, we don't 419 00:46:35,920 --> 00:46:40,760 have the problem that people going too fast on the square there. The problem would be 420 00:46:40,760 --> 00:46:44,720 how to get into that parking place that you find and how much traffic are you holding 421 00:46:44,720 --> 00:46:50,200 up as you find it. And so I think you want to stay with the, I'll, I'll still go with 422 00:46:50,200 --> 00:46:56,120 a roundabout. I lived in England a long time. So that's easy for me to say, um, as opposed 423 00:46:56,120 --> 00:47:02,920 to, uh, trying to go too way around the square. I a hundred percent concur. I'm going to weigh 424 00:47:02,920 --> 00:47:09,920 in, uh, while we're waiting for other people to raise their hand. Um, I live and work down 425 00:47:09,920 --> 00:47:18,480 here, so I'm on all these streets, mostly on foot and I cross Elm street, uh, south 426 00:47:18,480 --> 00:47:25,000 of the square on Mulberry, a minimal of four times a day. And it scares the bejesus out 427 00:47:25,000 --> 00:47:29,040 of me because I can't see when I'm walking across because of all the parking in front 428 00:47:29,040 --> 00:47:33,800 of the church and out in front of Hannah's on the street. You have to peer around the 429 00:47:33,800 --> 00:47:40,760 corner and people may be going 30 miles an hour, but it seems like they're going a lot 430 00:47:40,760 --> 00:47:46,520 faster. Um, I think as Alex pointed out, that's a three lane road. We, we don't have three 431 00:47:46,520 --> 00:47:56,880 lanes on our 35 in some areas. And so it's, it is really easy. And then, um, we took out 432 00:47:56,880 --> 00:48:01,180 traffic lights on the north side of the square heading back into the square. And so that 433 00:48:01,180 --> 00:48:05,880 sped up everybody on the north side so that they can come screeching down to the square. 434 00:48:05,880 --> 00:48:11,800 So I would, to me, it's a safety factor. I think some of the discussions we've had in 435 00:48:11,800 --> 00:48:21,160 the past have been, um, how do we slow traffic down around the square? I would agree with 436 00:48:21,160 --> 00:48:29,180 everybody on the square proper. It's slow, but getting there, it's fast. And anything 437 00:48:29,180 --> 00:48:35,900 we can do, I would say you divert people, you know, Elm and Locust used to be the way 438 00:48:35,900 --> 00:48:40,720 you got across town. I mean, those are old highways and they really, if you're trying 439 00:48:40,720 --> 00:48:49,080 to get from point A to point B and you're not going to downtown to shop or eat or live, 440 00:48:49,080 --> 00:48:55,000 we probably need to be on Carroll. I mean, that's, we want the through traffic, uh, north, 441 00:48:55,000 --> 00:49:01,780 south, east and west, I would say to go around the square too. And so if, if, if we can slow 442 00:49:01,780 --> 00:49:07,560 those one way streets down or make them two way to, I would say, create more congestion 443 00:49:07,560 --> 00:49:13,020 to make it easier, more pedestrian friendly and more bicycle friendly. Um, I don't know 444 00:49:13,020 --> 00:49:19,240 that I'm, uh, dead set on two, two way streets. I think that's my preference. It makes it 445 00:49:19,240 --> 00:49:26,280 easier for you to get to businesses. Maybe not the ones right on the square, but if you 446 00:49:26,280 --> 00:49:32,560 go a couple of blocks or several blocks, north, south, east and west, um, I don't can't, I've 447 00:49:32,560 --> 00:49:36,880 lived here almost 30 years and I still can't remember which street to turn on. If I'm going 448 00:49:36,880 --> 00:49:43,240 downhill to get to something on locus, I have to stop and think about it all the time and 449 00:49:43,240 --> 00:49:48,560 on the bicycle lane part of it. Um, if you really want to know what it's like on the 450 00:49:48,560 --> 00:49:54,680 streets and with traffic, I'd say get out on a bicycle and ride around. Um, even if 451 00:49:54,680 --> 00:50:00,480 we have, if we can't expand the streets to have two lanes each way, I would rather ride 452 00:50:00,480 --> 00:50:07,200 my bike on a two way situation with slower traffic than down locust around or Hickory 453 00:50:07,200 --> 00:50:12,440 on a one way where we have parallel parking and cars going 30 miles an hour. And it's 454 00:50:12,440 --> 00:50:19,720 nice that we've been able to add bike lanes on Hickory and, and Oak on the, um, west side 455 00:50:19,720 --> 00:50:26,760 of the square, but it, it's pretty scary. Just driving from downtown to Bonnie bray 456 00:50:26,760 --> 00:50:32,520 on Oak at 30 miles an hour. If you're in that left lane and there's students parked up and 457 00:50:32,520 --> 00:50:37,440 down there, I mean, I think I'm going to get somebody's side view mirror all the time. 458 00:50:37,440 --> 00:50:43,800 It's just a kind of scary, not even going to speed limit. So I think the, if I could 459 00:50:43,800 --> 00:50:50,280 some summarize our past conversations in this group and main street, I think safety for 460 00:50:50,280 --> 00:50:55,780 pedestrians and slowing things down around the square is probably the overriding factor 461 00:50:55,780 --> 00:51:01,480 whether we get that for two way or one way. I think, I think our goal would, we'd love 462 00:51:01,480 --> 00:51:09,600 to make it. I mean, going down Hickory even that's two lanes. I forget, is it 30 miles 463 00:51:09,600 --> 00:51:16,640 an hour? I mean, I feel fast. If I'm going 15, um, if you're going down on a Thursday 464 00:51:16,640 --> 00:51:23,900 evening and it's a two way street back in parking or whatever, it's, it probably ought 465 00:51:23,900 --> 00:51:28,560 to be a 15 mile an hour speed limit right there. It's, there's a lot of people walking 466 00:51:28,560 --> 00:51:36,360 around and a lot of trees and back in parking and all that stuff. So I would love to keep 467 00:51:36,360 --> 00:51:41,360 this conversation going. I think Bob said it, this may not be the best time to start 468 00:51:41,360 --> 00:51:46,360 redoing streets, but if we start planning that now, by the time everything's back to 469 00:51:46,360 --> 00:51:54,640 normal here in a couple of weeks, we should be able to get to work on them because I mean, 470 00:51:54,640 --> 00:51:58,360 we don't really have enough streets under construction now, so now would be a good, 471 00:51:58,360 --> 00:52:05,480 good time to start putting some more orange cones out. The work that's been going on on 472 00:52:05,480 --> 00:52:11,960 Elm and Locust south of the square the past couple of weeks has made things safer and 473 00:52:11,960 --> 00:52:19,800 it's made a one way street and it makes it easier to cross the street on all, all sides 474 00:52:19,800 --> 00:52:26,760 and I know Alex would echo that if he were here. Melissa? 475 00:52:26,760 --> 00:52:37,720 Yeah, I want to also give a thumbs up to the idea of let's look at traffic in the way pedestrians 476 00:52:37,720 --> 00:52:43,040 move downtown, whether it's, I don't know, two way or one way, but like the crosswalk 477 00:52:43,040 --> 00:52:49,080 that we now have on McKinney is, is pedestrian friendly and maybe there's a way to do that 478 00:52:49,080 --> 00:52:55,200 better on a one way or two way, I don't know, but to keep that in the forefront of the decision 479 00:52:55,200 --> 00:53:06,440 making process is to look at how pedestrians get around downtown. 480 00:53:06,440 --> 00:53:12,560 Anybody else have any comments or questions? I would imagine that if we had something that 481 00:53:12,560 --> 00:53:19,040 we think about later today or comments, we could send those into Christina or Jessica. 482 00:53:19,040 --> 00:53:24,640 For input, Melissa? Yeah, the other, the other question is, because 483 00:53:24,640 --> 00:53:28,920 we've been talking about that new outdoor seating concept and I don't know how traffic 484 00:53:28,920 --> 00:53:35,200 will play into that or if there needs to be long term decisions based on what we're considering 485 00:53:35,200 --> 00:53:42,840 doing on the new outdoor seating stuff. Yes, if you have comments or you think of 486 00:53:42,840 --> 00:53:47,400 something and it may not come to you until you're walking down there or driving around 487 00:53:47,400 --> 00:53:52,000 the square and you have an experience, please send us comments. I will share them with Todd 488 00:53:52,000 --> 00:53:58,160 and Brian or if you speak, I know a lot of you work and live down there and so if you 489 00:53:58,160 --> 00:54:02,000 think of something or you hear something from a neighbor, please share that. We want more 490 00:54:02,000 --> 00:54:13,640 input than less input so that we can keep working on a solution. 491 00:54:13,640 --> 00:54:17,800 Thank you, Brian. Appreciate the input and the opportunity for us to give some feedback 492 00:54:17,800 --> 00:54:23,320 on the streets. My pleasure. 493 00:54:23,320 --> 00:54:34,720 We want to get our results from our discussion on the grant so that Mr. Polito doesn't have 494 00:54:34,720 --> 00:54:40,600 to stick around here if he doesn't want to and even though it's a lot of fun. 495 00:54:40,600 --> 00:54:54,000 The total average score was 25. If you look at your score sheet, 25 allows a grant up 496 00:54:54,000 --> 00:55:04,040 to $25,000. The request was for $7,314 which is more within that range. 497 00:55:04,040 --> 00:55:27,480 The scores average 25 which allows for a grant up to the amount of $25,000. The grant requested 498 00:55:27,480 --> 00:55:35,640 was $7,313. Anybody want to make a motion? 499 00:55:35,640 --> 00:55:40,960 Marty, this is Monte. I would move that we grant them the full amount of $7,313. 500 00:55:40,960 --> 00:55:47,680 I'll second that. All right. We have a motion for Monte and a 501 00:55:47,680 --> 00:55:57,800 second from John. Any further discussion? I'm going to go around the board again and 502 00:55:57,800 --> 00:56:24,880 ask for ayes or nays. Melissa? Aye. Bob? Aye. John? Aye. Monke? Aye. Hank? Aye. Beth? Beth, 503 00:56:24,880 --> 00:56:35,680 you're on mute. I think there was an aye. Michael? Aye. All right. I think I got -- Brock, 504 00:56:35,680 --> 00:56:44,640 I missed you. Do you hear me? Yeah. Say that again. 505 00:56:44,640 --> 00:56:57,320 I had to abstain. He had to abstain. Okay. All right. We have -- everyone has 506 00:56:57,320 --> 00:57:03,440 voted for it with one abstention. So the motion carries. Thank you for your time. And, Eric, 507 00:57:03,440 --> 00:57:09,960 we're excited about the project. Look forward to things getting back to normal and going 508 00:57:09,960 --> 00:57:14,360 over there and having a good time. So thank you for your investment. We appreciate you 509 00:57:14,360 --> 00:57:19,320 being here. You're welcome to stick around and watch and play music. 510 00:57:19,320 --> 00:57:25,320 I'm going to head out. But thank you all very much. It helps a lot. And, yeah, we'll keep 511 00:57:25,320 --> 00:57:29,280 you all posted on opening. Thank you. 512 00:57:29,280 --> 00:57:38,680 All right. We need to give some input. EDP 20-022, receive report, hold discussion and 513 00:57:38,680 --> 00:57:46,800 give staff direction regarding a pilot program in downtown for Parklets and Streeteries. 514 00:57:46,800 --> 00:57:51,560 So I will apologize to the committee. I am not Richard Canone, the director of planning 515 00:57:51,560 --> 00:57:57,880 who did the majority of work on this project. So I'm going to do my best impression of planning 516 00:57:57,880 --> 00:58:02,360 at this point. So if you have questions or anything that is beyond my expertise, just 517 00:58:02,360 --> 00:58:07,960 let me know and I will get an answer for you. It just may be next week. So I'm going to 518 00:58:07,960 --> 00:58:19,520 go through this is the presentation that city council saw on Tuesday. So essentially we 519 00:58:19,520 --> 00:58:26,940 were getting feedback from a number of businesses requesting the consideration of possible extensions 520 00:58:26,940 --> 00:58:33,760 of outdoor seating through what was called Parklets. So Parklets are the use of public 521 00:58:33,760 --> 00:58:42,120 parking spaces for outdoor seating, microparks, all different sorts of uses. And it actually 522 00:58:42,120 --> 00:58:47,120 came out of an initiative in San Francisco, but they have been implemented across the 523 00:58:47,120 --> 00:58:54,080 country in varying degrees and different concepts and things like that. There's also a parking 524 00:58:54,080 --> 00:58:59,800 day on the third Friday of September each year where cities temporarily transform parking 525 00:58:59,800 --> 00:59:05,560 spaces into parks. And so that's something that was pretty inspirational as we went through 526 00:59:05,560 --> 00:59:12,760 this. So in our proposal, we recommended consideration of two different concepts. The first is a parklet 527 00:59:12,760 --> 00:59:19,080 and that's the use of a public parking space for an actual park function. It's available 528 00:59:19,080 --> 00:59:24,760 for the use of anyone. So it's not limited to a specific business that might make sense 529 00:59:24,760 --> 00:59:29,880 in certain areas of downtown. So we wanted to leave that concept as a possibility. The 530 00:59:29,880 --> 00:59:35,640 second concept is a streetery. It's like a parklet, same general design and concept. 531 00:59:35,640 --> 00:59:41,240 However, that the streetery is reserved for specific use of a particular business, the 532 00:59:41,240 --> 00:59:49,600 business that holds the license and they can limit occupants in the streetery during their 533 00:59:49,600 --> 00:59:56,840 business hours to their customers. With the streetery, businesses would also be able to, 534 00:59:56,840 --> 01:00:03,540 if they had the proper food and alcohol permits, be able to serve customers in those areas 535 01:00:03,540 --> 01:00:09,240 as well. Whereas a parklet, because it would be deemed park space, there would be no alcohol 536 01:00:09,240 --> 01:00:17,680 allowed. So it would follow the same rules as a city park. So we provided to city council 537 01:00:17,680 --> 01:00:24,840 a parklet manual and in that manual, it included addressing drainage and accessibility, landscaping, 538 01:00:24,840 --> 01:00:31,160 furniture, signage on parklets, design and safety, obviously safety being at the forefront 539 01:00:31,160 --> 01:00:35,800 of these. Anytime that we're introducing seating into an area that's normally reserved for 540 01:00:35,800 --> 01:00:41,520 vehicles, we want to make sure that we protect the individuals that are in those spaces. 541 01:00:41,520 --> 01:00:48,320 And then a consideration of the materials that can be used. So based on council direction 542 01:00:48,320 --> 01:00:54,400 that we received on June 23rd, we also provided information to Denton Main Street and made 543 01:00:54,400 --> 01:01:03,320 a presentation to them and took that information to city council. Then on June 30th, we city 544 01:01:03,320 --> 01:01:07,840 council approved a pilot program. The pilot program will last for six months. It goes 545 01:01:07,840 --> 01:01:13,960 into effect on July 14th and it goes through January 14th. And so one of the things that 546 01:01:13,960 --> 01:01:20,000 we want to continue to do is get feedback during this pilot program. Certainly this 547 01:01:20,000 --> 01:01:24,880 is something that's new. And so one of the things that Richard and I have talked about 548 01:01:24,880 --> 01:01:29,480 throughout this process is we're not going to just step away for six months and come 549 01:01:29,480 --> 01:01:33,920 back and see how it goes. We want to continually get feedback. And if we need to tweak something 550 01:01:33,920 --> 01:01:39,160 or make an adjustment, we want to make sure that we have the flexibility to do that, which 551 01:01:39,160 --> 01:01:45,320 is why we wanted to bring it to this committee, even though it's already adopted. So going 552 01:01:45,320 --> 01:01:52,160 through what city council approved on Tuesday, the pilot program will not include Elm, Hickory, 553 01:01:52,160 --> 01:01:58,200 Locust or Oak streets. So that's for the entirety of the streets within the purple and pink 554 01:01:58,200 --> 01:02:04,040 areas you see there. That's the downtown zoning designation. The areas you see in kind of 555 01:02:04,040 --> 01:02:12,560 the pink color just have the overlay. There's a max of two parklets per block face. We know 556 01:02:12,560 --> 01:02:17,440 that there are some different sizes of block faces, but certainly that's something we'll 557 01:02:17,440 --> 01:02:24,080 look at as we go through this. Amplified music would not be permitted. As I mentioned, smoking 558 01:02:24,080 --> 01:02:28,280 wouldn't be permitted in either, but alcohol would be permitted in a street streetery, 559 01:02:28,280 --> 01:02:35,260 as long as the permits to allow that. There are some very small fees associated with this. 560 01:02:35,260 --> 01:02:39,440 There's a permit fee of $50. And then if you apply for a streetery, there's an additional 561 01:02:39,440 --> 01:02:45,080 license of $50. And then furniture that would be allowed. Obviously, businesses could have 562 01:02:45,080 --> 01:02:51,220 tables, chairs, benches, as well as shade structures. The only thing that we would ask on the shade 563 01:02:51,220 --> 01:02:57,220 structures is that they be taken down, especially in a streetery, that they be taken down or 564 01:02:57,220 --> 01:03:06,620 that furniture that could be removed at night. So that there's not a risk continuing in that. 565 01:03:06,620 --> 01:03:10,280 And then as I mentioned, the pilot program is going to run for six months, July 14th 566 01:03:10,280 --> 01:03:16,060 to January 14th. And at this point, we have the approved manual and license agreement. 567 01:03:16,060 --> 01:03:20,120 And so starting next week, Richard and I will be working through how we process these and 568 01:03:20,120 --> 01:03:25,240 we'll be reaching out to some of the businesses that requested this to let them know that 569 01:03:25,240 --> 01:03:32,080 we're here to work with them through this and through their application so that we can 570 01:03:32,080 --> 01:03:41,240 see if we can get some parklets or streeteries in downtown Denton. And that's all I have. 571 01:03:41,240 --> 01:03:52,460 Anybody have any questions or comments? Bob? I was just wondering if you're able to say 572 01:03:52,460 --> 01:03:57,720 who has requested that so far. I think it's a good idea. I'm interested who's involved 573 01:03:57,720 --> 01:04:03,040 with it. We have had a number of requests from different 574 01:04:03,040 --> 01:04:10,800 bars and restaurants in downtown. And so they no one has applied directly, but I believe 575 01:04:10,800 --> 01:04:15,600 the owner of the loophole spoke at a council meeting requesting one. And then we've been 576 01:04:15,600 --> 01:04:19,800 in discussions with a couple other businesses that have been interested. 577 01:04:19,800 --> 01:04:27,920 But as an example, loophole wouldn't be eligible, was that? 578 01:04:27,920 --> 01:04:32,120 They wouldn't be eligible for one on the front of their business. They could consider if 579 01:04:32,120 --> 01:04:42,000 they found a way to make it work on the back side, yes, on the new streets. The same with 580 01:04:42,000 --> 01:04:49,440 John's restaurant. And Monte's, I believe as well. 581 01:04:49,440 --> 01:04:54,800 What about something more semi-permanent on the square to allow for the ones that are 582 01:04:54,800 --> 01:05:00,160 excluded from this to have an outdoor, like more of a static outdoor seating space. So 583 01:05:00,160 --> 01:05:07,180 as opposed to letting people sort of congregate on the square sort of willy-nilly just to 584 01:05:07,180 --> 01:05:18,360 have like tables and chairs set up in that the county sets up or the city sets up. 585 01:05:18,360 --> 01:05:22,600 That's something that we can look at. It would be separate from this program that did come 586 01:05:22,600 --> 01:05:30,280 up in our conversations of would it be possible to do a separate public seating area? Obviously 587 01:05:30,280 --> 01:05:38,220 there are limitations in terms of permitting and locations and is it taking away from parking. 588 01:05:38,220 --> 01:05:43,000 But if it's just something on the courthouse lawn, we can ask the county what their interests 589 01:05:43,000 --> 01:05:47,240 would be and have that discussion. 590 01:05:47,240 --> 01:05:53,960 What is the difference between a streetery, I mean is that on the street? Has to be on 591 01:05:53,960 --> 01:06:02,080 the street. Where I'm kind of going with this is what is to prevent somebody from just putting 592 01:06:02,080 --> 01:06:06,840 some chairs out on the sidewalk. We have a couple of restaurants downtown that do that, 593 01:06:06,840 --> 01:06:10,440 some that don't. 594 01:06:10,440 --> 01:06:13,760 Yes, this is the specific use of a parking space. 595 01:06:13,760 --> 01:06:14,760 Okay. 596 01:06:14,760 --> 01:06:19,680 It would be separate from the sidewalk cafes. 597 01:06:19,680 --> 01:06:28,240 Has the council considered or has anybody considered maybe having a instead of it was 598 01:06:28,240 --> 01:06:32,480 raised a little fairness issue. Some people kind of first come first serve got it and 599 01:06:32,480 --> 01:06:36,920 then they had to wait because there's only a max per two per block. If we were to have 600 01:06:36,920 --> 01:06:43,960 something on the square that was a shared streetery that would be available only for 601 01:06:43,960 --> 01:06:51,320 not so much table service, but it could be shared for restaurants for delivery. Like 602 01:06:51,320 --> 01:06:58,280 they would deliver a food to go takeout, but a shared streetery for eating takeout that 603 01:06:58,280 --> 01:07:06,880 could be delivered to the table that we could all share instead of first come first serve. 604 01:07:06,880 --> 01:07:12,200 I think that we could think through the logistics of that. One of the challenges that we were 605 01:07:12,200 --> 01:07:20,320 dealing with was the service of alcohol. Obviously the rules are a little bit different right 606 01:07:20,320 --> 01:07:27,640 now than they are typically, but what would be allowed if it was sort of a shared public 607 01:07:27,640 --> 01:07:33,720 space and it was considered a park, then there would be no alcohol allowed. So that's the 608 01:07:33,720 --> 01:07:36,920 challenge of a central space. 609 01:07:36,920 --> 01:07:41,920 Isn't it just no alcohol on a park, excuse me, on a parklet, not a streetery? 610 01:07:41,920 --> 01:07:46,480 There's no alcohol. So the city's park rules would apply to a parklet, which would mean 611 01:07:46,480 --> 01:07:47,480 no alcohol. 612 01:07:47,480 --> 01:07:52,000 Well, could we designate it as a streetery? 613 01:07:52,000 --> 01:07:58,120 So under the definition that we've been adopted, the streetery is for a specific business. 614 01:07:58,120 --> 01:08:02,560 And then even if it was a, so if it was a shared space, it would fall under the park 615 01:08:02,560 --> 01:08:08,040 rules. The way that the code is the way that you're currently have defined it. Okay. 616 01:08:08,040 --> 01:08:12,600 I think the one advantage to what John's talking about, I understand it's a different definition, 617 01:08:12,600 --> 01:08:16,720 is let's say you wanted to, let's say I wanted to eat at Mellow Mushroom and Bob wanted to 618 01:08:16,720 --> 01:08:21,040 eat, you know, get ice cream at Beth Marie's and we were going to sit together, we're friends, 619 01:08:21,040 --> 01:08:24,320 we're going to meet down there, we're going to sit together and eat, but maybe I want 620 01:08:24,320 --> 01:08:29,400 to have a cocktail and all of a sudden I'd be precluded from doing that. And then he wouldn't 621 01:08:29,400 --> 01:08:33,280 be able to eat with me. I just, I think there are some advantages of that shared space that 622 01:08:33,280 --> 01:08:35,280 John's talking about. 623 01:08:35,280 --> 01:08:43,680 I guess they would have to redefine the streetery. So it's a shared, shared space for, I don't 624 01:08:43,680 --> 01:08:49,000 know if you can offer the full service piece because it might be difficult, might be not 625 01:08:49,000 --> 01:08:55,480 even close to your restaurant, but let's say I had one in front of Cartwrights and Leupold 626 01:08:55,480 --> 01:09:00,920 could also use that space. And I guess we could deliver food for them. It would be kind 627 01:09:00,920 --> 01:09:07,040 of difficult for full service, but they can certainly deliver takeout for that. And I 628 01:09:07,040 --> 01:09:13,280 think that would, I mean, takeout delivery around the square that you're eating outside 629 01:09:13,280 --> 01:09:17,720 on a great day and somebody wants Leupold, somebody wants Dick's Coneon or somebody wants 630 01:09:17,720 --> 01:09:22,200 JJ's Pizza or Mellow Mushroom or what. So shared space might have some advantages. 631 01:09:22,200 --> 01:09:27,000 Yeah. I just think if I pay for the permit, I absolutely wouldn't want people bringing 632 01:09:27,000 --> 01:09:31,400 in outside food and drink. And I would, if I paid for the permit, I've paid for the furniture 633 01:09:31,400 --> 01:09:36,800 and I've built the streetery, I would say you can't bring in outside food or drink period. 634 01:09:36,800 --> 01:09:43,680 But if it was a common space, it would allow greater flexibility of people that are meeting 635 01:09:43,680 --> 01:09:50,900 there safely outside to be able to share a meal together with different food requirements. 636 01:09:50,900 --> 01:09:55,720 Maybe someone's vegan or they want Thai and I want barbecue. 637 01:09:55,720 --> 01:10:01,120 John's wanting a couple of parking spaces, maybe on each side of the square that was 638 01:10:01,120 --> 01:10:05,840 to go order pickup only that everybody could use. So you could, if you were on the south 639 01:10:05,840 --> 01:10:10,640 side of the square or whatever restaurants there, there were designated spaces for people 640 01:10:10,640 --> 01:10:16,360 to pull into. So that really isn't any of the things that we've talked about. That's 641 01:10:16,360 --> 01:10:23,320 just a preserving parking spaces. Marty. Yes, Hank. Quick clarification though. 642 01:10:23,320 --> 01:10:27,840 We're not talking about the main arteries of the square. We're talking side streets 643 01:10:27,840 --> 01:10:32,680 with the streeter is right now. Correct? What was approved was that John was just asking, 644 01:10:32,680 --> 01:10:38,240 is there, is there a way to do something a little different for the restaurants on the 645 01:10:38,240 --> 01:10:43,560 square or something like that? Yeah. And I'm on the square, but you know, I could do something 646 01:10:43,560 --> 01:10:49,120 on Cedar street. It's got a little bit of a slope to it. So, um, and it just, it doesn't 647 01:10:49,120 --> 01:10:52,200 seem logical. I don't, you know, I don't know it, you know, I could be wrong, but there 648 01:10:52,200 --> 01:11:00,200 could be wild success on Walnut street. I don't see how, but, um, but I was just, Hank, 649 01:11:00,200 --> 01:11:05,640 I was just suggesting maybe we, if we, if we redefine streetery, we can make that work. 650 01:11:05,640 --> 01:11:09,440 You know, it's, we have, we don't have any open container. You can drink beer outside. 651 01:11:09,440 --> 01:11:15,000 And I have a Cartwrights and I think Suzanne has one chestnut tree, a BG license that they 652 01:11:15,000 --> 01:11:20,880 can walk out with a bottle of beer if they want to. And, uh, and that kind of thing. 653 01:11:20,880 --> 01:11:24,720 Yeah. It just, the thing you guys consistently bring up is that the conflict with the trash 654 01:11:24,720 --> 01:11:28,480 pickup and the dumpsters and all that. I'm just trying to visualize how all that would 655 01:11:28,480 --> 01:11:33,520 work on streets like Walnut. But you all know better than me. I just go down there as a 656 01:11:33,520 --> 01:11:38,880 consumer. I don't live down there. So I will agree that, you know, through this process 657 01:11:38,880 --> 01:11:43,200 and we've really made, made sure that we want to learn from this process and listen to what's 658 01:11:43,200 --> 01:11:48,720 working and what's not working. And, and we have had to take into account, and I, I don't 659 01:11:48,720 --> 01:11:52,000 want to speak for the city council, but I know that a lot of comments that we received 660 01:11:52,000 --> 01:11:58,140 back, the reasons that the square and, or Elm and Hickory and Locust and Elm were removed 661 01:11:58,140 --> 01:12:02,980 were concerns for parking and then concerns about the travel speeds, which again is something 662 01:12:02,980 --> 01:12:08,840 related to what you were talking about in your last item. And so, um, definitely we're 663 01:12:08,840 --> 01:12:16,080 trying to balance as many interests as we can. Um, but nothing stops us from continuing 664 01:12:16,080 --> 01:12:20,920 to get feedback and make adjustments as, as we're hearing from, from the businesses and, 665 01:12:20,920 --> 01:12:21,920 and the community. 666 01:12:21,920 --> 01:12:28,400 Hey Jessica, this is Michael Talley. What has been the discussion internally and maybe 667 01:12:28,400 --> 01:12:35,520 y'all had some, some businesses present at council as well on, on the differences between 668 01:12:35,520 --> 01:12:40,440 a park with streetery and utilizing some of the sidewalk space or do y'all see that as, 669 01:12:40,440 --> 01:12:44,120 you know, the restaurants, most restaurants are already utilizing that space and there 670 01:12:44,120 --> 01:12:49,960 just wouldn't be enough space for, um, basically patrons to, to walk back and forth in front 671 01:12:49,960 --> 01:12:53,400 of the restaurants. 672 01:12:53,400 --> 01:12:58,400 So we didn't talk specifically about the, these in relation to the sidewalk cafes or 673 01:12:58,400 --> 01:13:03,600 any of the outdoor seating that restaurants have. Our primary goal was just providing 674 01:13:03,600 --> 01:13:12,040 extra, um, space to restaurants. Um, when we were on the limited occupancy levels for 675 01:13:12,040 --> 01:13:17,760 COVID and so that was our, that was sort of the impetus to this and how it came to us 676 01:13:17,760 --> 01:13:25,000 and the requests were made from businesses themselves simply to allow them, um, especially, 677 01:13:25,000 --> 01:13:30,200 I believe it first came up when the very, if you think back a few months ago when reopening 678 01:13:30,200 --> 01:13:37,480 was very first starting, there was this outdoor only, um, seating allowed in that first phase 679 01:13:37,480 --> 01:13:40,360 and that's when we started this process. 680 01:13:40,360 --> 01:13:47,200 Okay. I know we, we have reached out to, um, well, there's many cities that have done different 681 01:13:47,200 --> 01:13:52,440 things, but I know one of the first ones we reached out to was Southlake. Um, they did, 682 01:13:52,440 --> 01:13:57,320 they temporarily sort of, you know, allowing their restaurants to utilize more sidewalk 683 01:13:57,320 --> 01:14:01,600 space just because of that outdoor requirement and that, you know, the indoor dining percentage 684 01:14:01,600 --> 01:14:16,920 is obviously much lower and there were, there were some issues with that. 685 01:14:16,920 --> 01:14:22,600 There any other questions? Um, certainly, like I said, this is, we are learning right 686 01:14:22,600 --> 01:14:28,240 alongside with you and we're going to be on this journey with all of the businesses in 687 01:14:28,240 --> 01:14:36,080 downtown and all of the patrons who are experiencing this. Um, so let us know what the experience 688 01:14:36,080 --> 01:14:42,120 is or let us know ideas that you have or ways that we can make this better. Um, our goal 689 01:14:42,120 --> 01:14:46,680 is to support, support all of our downtown businesses to the best extent that we can 690 01:14:46,680 --> 01:14:50,600 and give them every opportunity to succeed. 691 01:14:50,600 --> 01:15:01,760 All right. I guess, uh, we'll move on to the staff report. 692 01:15:01,760 --> 01:15:09,000 Okay. Um, under openings, you've had this Denton Sports Chiropractic, which is in the 693 01:15:09,000 --> 01:15:10,000 former. 694 01:15:10,000 --> 01:15:11,000 Hypnotic Donuts. 695 01:15:11,000 --> 01:15:18,320 Hypnotic Donuts. Thank you. Um, Red's Yard did open, but I haven't seen them open since 696 01:15:18,320 --> 01:15:24,640 their initial opening and that's in, uh, Ken's Produce location over there on the go. Cookie 697 01:15:24,640 --> 01:15:31,040 Crave opened, Salon Indico. And then after the posting of the agenda, Three Wishes opened 698 01:15:31,040 --> 01:15:38,400 in the former Market on Oak location, which closed. Um, Nift closed, Scrap is closed, 699 01:15:38,400 --> 01:15:45,560 Freaks and Geeks, Source Gaming Lounge, Cryptozoology, Escaping the Square. And then additionally, 700 01:15:45,560 --> 01:15:50,840 since a posting, we've seen, um, announcements from Mad World Records, Wine Squared, and 701 01:15:50,840 --> 01:15:52,600 the Juice Lab. 702 01:15:52,600 --> 01:16:01,920 Um, coming soon, we still have Oak to Hickory. I mean, sorry, Hickory to Oak. Um, Caskey's, 703 01:16:01,920 --> 01:16:05,480 which has been under construction for several months. I have not been able to confirm their 704 01:16:05,480 --> 01:16:12,960 location or not the location, but their opening at the new location. And then on the downtown 705 01:16:12,960 --> 01:16:19,280 Grants, um, the Movement Lab has successfully completed construction and received their 706 01:16:19,280 --> 01:16:26,360 grant. And if you have an opportunity to drive by McKinney, um, Mr. Dow has really been moving 707 01:16:26,360 --> 01:16:30,400 along on his project. So I expect him to finish pretty soon. 708 01:16:30,400 --> 01:16:41,560 Um, next meeting date is August 6th. And that's my report. Nift was, um, a second hand, like 709 01:16:41,560 --> 01:16:48,240 vintage clothing. They were on Austin Street there in a small space. 710 01:16:48,240 --> 01:16:52,360 And I'll have one correction on the meeting date. You normally would meet on August 6th. 711 01:16:52,360 --> 01:16:57,360 Um, we do have limitations. This is our only room and our only ability to host all of the 712 01:16:57,360 --> 01:17:03,360 remote meetings. And City Council, I believe, has a budget workshop scheduled for that day. 713 01:17:03,360 --> 01:17:09,680 So we will be bumped. Um, so we'll send out an alternate date for August, um, to the committee 714 01:17:09,680 --> 01:17:20,600 members as soon as we find an available date. Okay. Anything else? Anybody has for the good 715 01:17:20,600 --> 01:17:29,040 of the order? Happy Independence Day, everybody. 716 01:17:29,040 --> 01:17:36,320 Thank you for being here today. I appreciate everybody's input. And, uh, I think it'll 717 01:17:36,320 --> 01:17:41,360 be okay if I say this out loud, Alex family dog died in the middle of the night. So he's 718 01:17:41,360 --> 01:17:48,000 dealing with that with his family this morning and rough times and best wishes to him and 719 01:17:48,000 --> 01:17:53,200 his family. And, um, thank you for being here. We'll see you all soon. 720 01:17:53,200 --> 01:17:56,120 Okay. Adios. Thanks. Thank you.