WEBVTT

00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:10.000
 Good morning. I'd like to call the Public Utility Board meeting of Monday, February 24th, 2020 to order.

00:00:10.000 --> 00:00:20.000
 It is 9 o'clock and we have a quorum. I'd like to start out by deferring to Mario. He's got clarifications to make about the agenda.

00:00:20.000 --> 00:00:25.000
 Yes. Good morning, board members. If you'll notice on your agenda, it looks a little different as far as the sequencing.

00:00:25.000 --> 00:00:32.000
 What we're trying to do is we're working with our staff to try to make staff's time more efficient, more effective.

00:00:32.000 --> 00:00:42.000
 So the reason why you see it the way you do is, as you noticed in the past, when we have work sessions, sometimes if we have individual consideration items or consent items,

00:00:42.000 --> 00:00:49.000
 some of the staff that's left in either side of the room, they're having to watch the work sessions that don't pertain to them.

00:00:49.000 --> 00:00:55.000
 And so what we're trying to do is get them through consent items, individual consideration items. Once they're done, they'll clear out.

00:00:55.000 --> 00:00:59.000
 And that way they can just take the people who need to stay here for the remainder of the meeting will stay.

00:00:59.000 --> 00:01:04.000
 We're still working on tweaking those agenda items. So be patient if you don't mind.

00:01:04.000 --> 00:01:11.000
 So we want to create we're a little crazy, not too crazy. It was intended to be this way for today's meeting.

00:01:11.000 --> 00:01:16.000
 It's very good. Thank you. Go ahead. Start the regular meeting up with the consent agenda.

00:01:16.000 --> 00:01:25.000
 Are there any members that would like to pull any of these items? I'd like to pull one B.

00:01:25.000 --> 00:01:41.000
 If there are no other, then we'll move to is there a move to approve consent agenda items? A, C, D, E and E.

00:01:41.000 --> 00:01:53.000
 Move approval. I second motion and second. All those in favor, please say aye. Aye. Those opposed say the same passes.

00:01:53.000 --> 00:02:02.000
 OK, Adams for individual consideration. I think I thought I heard Charlie making a comment on something in the minutes earlier. Is that correct?

00:02:02.000 --> 00:02:13.000
 I had a minor typo correction. Yeah, the one that he oh, we do. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. Yeah, let's back back up.

00:02:13.000 --> 00:02:20.000
 OK, what did you want to pull agenda item B?

00:02:20.000 --> 00:02:30.000
 Can you give us just a quick walk through of what happens with the electronics and what the UER does?

00:02:30.000 --> 00:02:42.000
 Brian Burner, Director of Solid Waste with the City of Denton. As part of our services to the City of Denton residents, we do take electronics for proper disposal.

00:02:42.000 --> 00:02:51.000
 Once we receive them on site, we palletize them, you know, monitors TVs, you know, do some some very rough sorting from there.

00:02:51.000 --> 00:03:00.000
 The company picks them up, takes them back to their facility. And at that point, one of several things may happen.

00:03:00.000 --> 00:03:09.000
 They'll check the piece of equipment to determine if it's operational. If it is, they'll wipe it, reboot it, refurb it, and they may sell it as a new product.

00:03:09.000 --> 00:03:14.000
 Again, they'll take apart components that are working like motherboards, chips, things of that nature.

00:03:14.000 --> 00:03:22.000
 They'll repurpose those anything that is intended for ultimate disposal. At that point, they'll send materials for ultimate recycling.

00:03:22.000 --> 00:03:31.000
 So trying to reuse and recover as much as possible and any fluff that's left over then that will go into an ultimate disposal option.

00:03:31.000 --> 00:03:41.000
 And it is certified and none of it all stays in the states. It does not go to third world countries to be disposed of things of that nature.

00:03:41.000 --> 00:03:53.000
 I just my concern is that we're paying $400 per ton to get rid of stuff and we allow people to dump at $40 a ton.

00:03:53.000 --> 00:04:02.000
 And that tenfold factor yet to recycle if we have the ability to reuse it or recycle it anywhere near profitably.

00:04:02.000 --> 00:04:12.000
 But it looks like it's just a vacuum where costs go from this contract. Is it just pretty much all downside there?

00:04:12.000 --> 00:04:19.000
 That would be correct. I mean, there are costs. You know, every time a person touches this, there is cost that's applied to it.

00:04:19.000 --> 00:04:33.000
 Because again, the profits made in the sale, the repurpose, but at the end of the day, it is a net cost to the city of Denton to dispose of this material.

00:04:33.000 --> 00:04:48.000
 Ten times the amount of what we could dump it for. In terms of the hazards that are in there, I mean, I think this kind of shows that the opportunities are pretty limited for making money or using this responsibly.

00:04:48.000 --> 00:04:59.000
 I guess the other side would be, are the hazards really that great from electronics that we can't stand to have them in the landfill?

00:04:59.000 --> 00:05:06.000
 Once you remove the batteries, I mean, ultimately you could dispose of that material directly into the fill site.

00:05:06.000 --> 00:05:15.000
 However, there are other options that are available to residents. We're sort of the recycler of last resorts. You can take it back where you bought it.

00:05:15.000 --> 00:05:20.000
 I know there are several retail agencies within the city of Denton and across the nation that will take that material.

00:05:20.000 --> 00:05:32.000
 And if you go onto the TCEQ's website and just type in TCEQ computer recycling or TV recycling, you'll get a list of 100 more manufacturers that will take their material back either at no or low cost.

00:05:32.000 --> 00:05:37.000
 So again, we're just one option in the mix. We would like people to take advantage of these other options.

00:05:37.000 --> 00:05:42.000
 But at the end of the day, if they bring it to us, we need to be able to manage that in an environmentally sound manner.

00:05:42.000 --> 00:05:43.000
 Thank you.

00:05:43.000 --> 00:05:44.000
 You're welcome.

00:05:44.000 --> 00:05:49.000
 So I just had a quick question. Who handled it before this contract? Same people?

00:05:49.000 --> 00:05:55.000
 No, it was a different company. And the name slips my mind right now.

00:05:55.000 --> 00:05:57.000
 And they just didn't bid on this one?

00:05:57.000 --> 00:06:02.000
 No, they did. But they were higher than what this company is right here.

00:06:02.000 --> 00:06:22.000
 I went on the company's website and I was initially concerned because, as you mentioned, there have been situations where U.S. recyclers saying they're doing the sorting and everything in country are actually sending it overseas with terrible environmental consequences.

00:06:22.000 --> 00:06:32.000
 But this outfit's really good and they have what they call a zero landfill capacity, which I think is a really good direction to take.

00:06:32.000 --> 00:06:37.000
 So I was very pleased to see that this company has been hired by the city.

00:06:37.000 --> 00:06:40.000
 Thank you.

00:06:40.000 --> 00:06:49.000
 That being said, I'm going to entertain a motion for item B of the consent agenda.

00:06:49.000 --> 00:06:50.000
 I move.

00:06:50.000 --> 00:06:53.000
 Motion.

00:06:53.000 --> 00:06:54.000
 Second.

00:06:54.000 --> 00:06:56.000
 Motion and a second. All those in favor, please say aye.

00:06:56.000 --> 00:06:57.000
 Aye.

00:06:57.000 --> 00:06:58.000
 Any opposed?

00:06:58.000 --> 00:06:59.000
 I'll go down opposed.

00:06:59.000 --> 00:07:00.000
 You'll go down opposed. Okay.

00:07:00.000 --> 00:07:01.000
 Passes.

00:07:01.000 --> 00:07:02.000
 Thank you.

00:07:02.000 --> 00:07:03.000
 Thank you.

00:07:03.000 --> 00:07:06.000
 Now we'll move on to items for individual consideration.

00:07:06.000 --> 00:07:12.000
 Consider the approval of minutes of February 10th, 2020.

00:07:12.000 --> 00:07:16.000
 I'll move approval with one typographical.

00:07:16.000 --> 00:07:21.000
 You pass that on to Miss Makin, right?

00:07:21.000 --> 00:07:22.000
 Okay.

00:07:22.000 --> 00:07:25.000
 Motion.

00:07:25.000 --> 00:07:26.000
 I'll move.

00:07:26.000 --> 00:07:28.000
 We have a motion.

00:07:28.000 --> 00:07:29.000
 What are we on now?

00:07:29.000 --> 00:07:30.000
 Minutes.

00:07:30.000 --> 00:07:31.000
 Oh, okay.

00:07:31.000 --> 00:07:32.000
 A second.

00:07:32.000 --> 00:07:33.000
 Motion and a second.

00:07:33.000 --> 00:07:34.000
 All those in favor, please say aye.

00:07:34.000 --> 00:07:35.000
 Aye.

00:07:35.000 --> 00:07:36.000
 Any opposed?

00:07:36.000 --> 00:07:37.000
 Say the same.

00:07:37.000 --> 00:07:38.000
 Okay.

00:07:38.000 --> 00:07:39.000
 Passes.

00:07:39.000 --> 00:07:40.000
 All right.

00:07:40.000 --> 00:07:46.000
 Item of individual consideration B. Consider recommending adoption of an ordinance in the

00:07:46.000 --> 00:07:47.000
 City of Denton, a Texas home rule.

00:07:47.000 --> 00:07:50.000
 Do I have to read the whole thing?

00:07:50.000 --> 00:07:54.000
 Do I need to read the whole thing?

00:07:54.000 --> 00:07:55.000
 No.

00:07:55.000 --> 00:07:56.000
 Okay.

00:07:56.000 --> 00:07:57.000
 Item B. Any questions?

00:07:57.000 --> 00:07:58.000
 Comments?

00:07:58.000 --> 00:08:02.000
 You're going to make a presentation, right?

00:08:02.000 --> 00:08:03.000
 Okay.

00:08:03.000 --> 00:08:16.000
 I'll do so.

00:08:16.000 --> 00:08:17.000
 Okay.

00:08:17.000 --> 00:08:18.000
 This is the right item.

00:08:18.000 --> 00:08:24.000
 I have a couple of items this morning.

00:08:24.000 --> 00:08:27.000
 Chairman, members of the board, Terry Kader, Fleet Superintendent.

00:08:27.000 --> 00:08:35.000
 This item is for the purchase of aerial bucket trucks on a source well contract for the electric

00:08:35.000 --> 00:08:39.000
 department and traffic department specifically.

00:08:39.000 --> 00:08:48.000
 So just a little background.

00:08:48.000 --> 00:08:53.000
 Currently with the fleet includes about 32 aerial trucks split between DME and parks

00:08:53.000 --> 00:08:54.000
 and traffic.

00:08:54.000 --> 00:08:57.000
 Parks only has one unit right now.

00:08:57.000 --> 00:09:01.000
 The majority of those, of course, are in DME.

00:09:01.000 --> 00:09:08.000
 And the contract is for specifically the bucket truck series, ATM and TA series of trucks

00:09:08.000 --> 00:09:10.000
 that ALTEC provides.

00:09:10.000 --> 00:09:14.000
 Fleet purchases these trucks whenever they're available and fit the specific needs of the

00:09:14.000 --> 00:09:18.000
 department when they get ready to replace or add a vehicle into the fleet.

00:09:18.000 --> 00:09:24.000
 And the reason we like ALTEC is they use factory trained technicians that will come out in

00:09:24.000 --> 00:09:27.000
 the field and service these units in the field so we don't have to down them and take them

00:09:27.000 --> 00:09:29.000
 to the facility to be repaired.

00:09:29.000 --> 00:09:34.000
 They do on-site diagnostics and repair as well as warranty work.

00:09:34.000 --> 00:09:39.000
 And they will also do the required annual inspections for us.

00:09:39.000 --> 00:09:42.000
 Our fleet technicians currently don't work on aerial equipment.

00:09:42.000 --> 00:09:47.000
 It's basically due to the risk factor involved, the liability.

00:09:47.000 --> 00:09:54.000
 So this contract is a $3 million contract that we have currently a need for six trucks.

00:09:54.000 --> 00:09:58.000
 Five of those are the AT40M, 48M series trucks.

00:09:58.000 --> 00:10:02.000
 And those are for the operations department of DME.

00:10:02.000 --> 00:10:05.000
 And the other truck is a TA60 model.

00:10:05.000 --> 00:10:09.000
 That's a 60-foot telescopic articulating unit.

00:10:09.000 --> 00:10:14.000
 And that's for the distribution department for electric.

00:10:14.000 --> 00:10:19.000
 We anticipate the need for up to seven more units on this contract over the life of the

00:10:19.000 --> 00:10:20.000
 contract.

00:10:20.000 --> 00:10:22.000
 And you'll notice this is only a two-year contract.

00:10:22.000 --> 00:10:28.000
 And that's basically because that's the length of the source wheel agreement with ALTEC.

00:10:28.000 --> 00:10:32.000
 And there's a very good chance that they'll renew that agreement at the end of the two

00:10:32.000 --> 00:10:33.000
 years.

00:10:33.000 --> 00:10:34.000
 They typically do.

00:10:34.000 --> 00:10:36.000
 But we just made this contract coincide with that.

00:10:36.000 --> 00:10:41.000
 So it's good through 2021.

00:10:41.000 --> 00:10:50.000
 These units for 2021, these are just estimated replacements and possible fleet additions.

00:10:50.000 --> 00:10:52.000
 And so we're just asking for the spending authority.

00:10:52.000 --> 00:10:55.000
 Of course, none of these trucks have been approved yet.

00:10:55.000 --> 00:11:01.000
 They will all be approved through the board before they're purchased.

00:11:01.000 --> 00:11:06.000
 Some of the benefits, the contract provides turnkey.

00:11:06.000 --> 00:11:09.000
 They'll give us the freight liner and the Dodge chassis.

00:11:09.000 --> 00:11:13.000
 They'll actually work with us on the chassis to our specification.

00:11:13.000 --> 00:11:18.000
 The reason we like to do that is because these trucks are typically one year out.

00:11:18.000 --> 00:11:21.000
 And so we use their stock chassis.

00:11:21.000 --> 00:11:25.000
 That way we don't have a chassis being built and sitting on the ground up there waiting

00:11:25.000 --> 00:11:30.000
 for a year for it to have the body put on it.

00:11:30.000 --> 00:11:33.000
 And they do accept letters of intent for us.

00:11:33.000 --> 00:11:36.000
 So these six trucks, we've issued a letter of intent.

00:11:36.000 --> 00:11:37.000
 They're already in the build cycle.

00:11:37.000 --> 00:11:40.000
 It kind of reduces that one year build period.

00:11:40.000 --> 00:11:42.000
 So we don't have to wait.

00:11:42.000 --> 00:11:46.000
 If we're pretty sure that these trucks are going to be approved, we'll give them a letter of intent.

00:11:46.000 --> 00:11:47.000
 It's nonbinding.

00:11:47.000 --> 00:11:53.000
 So if something happens and they're not approved, we're not liable or required to purchase them.

00:11:53.000 --> 00:11:59.000
 Again, they have factory trained onsite technicians for the maintenance and repair of these trucks.

00:11:59.000 --> 00:12:04.000
 And the big benefit is the department confidence in the units.

00:12:04.000 --> 00:12:12.000
 Denton Municipal Electric as well as the traffic department have expressed confidence in these units.

00:12:12.000 --> 00:12:18.000
 And in the past, the city's operated various types of aerial equipment in terms of bucket trucks.

00:12:18.000 --> 00:12:20.000
 But these are by far the most reliable.

00:12:20.000 --> 00:12:25.000
 And the technicians provided do a really good job and turn around these trucks for us.

00:12:25.000 --> 00:12:30.000
 The other thing about Alltech is that they sell direct to the customer.

00:12:30.000 --> 00:12:34.000
 They don't have distributors across the country, so we buy directly from Alltech.

00:12:34.000 --> 00:12:37.000
 And they're out of St. Joseph, Missouri.

00:12:37.000 --> 00:12:43.000
 So, of course, our recommendation is to award a two-year contract to Alltech for the $3 million.

00:12:43.000 --> 00:12:48.000
 We have a need currently of $1,113,000.

00:12:48.000 --> 00:12:53.000
 That's for those six trucks that we currently want to order from them.

00:12:53.000 --> 00:12:58.000
 And that concludes my presentation.

00:12:58.000 --> 00:13:01.000
 Yeah, I have a question.

00:13:01.000 --> 00:13:05.000
 Six trucks this year and seven next year, right?

00:13:05.000 --> 00:13:06.000
 Possibly seven trucks.

00:13:06.000 --> 00:13:11.000
 And that includes some planned replacements as well as any possible additions.

00:13:11.000 --> 00:13:17.000
 I think, like I said, none of those seven trucks are approved at this point.

00:13:17.000 --> 00:13:23.000
 How many of those on there would be additions beyond the fleet level you have now?

00:13:23.000 --> 00:13:28.000
 Probably two at the most.

00:13:28.000 --> 00:13:34.000
 Do you make any replacement decisions looking at the run hours on a piece of equipment?

00:13:34.000 --> 00:13:35.000
 We do.

00:13:35.000 --> 00:13:40.000
 We look at the -- there are a lot of factors that goes into that equation as to when we determine replacements.

00:13:40.000 --> 00:13:46.000
 And I'll actually be doing a presentation on fleet replacements in just a few minutes.

00:13:46.000 --> 00:13:59.000
 And I can answer all your questions then.

00:13:59.000 --> 00:14:00.000
 Good morning.

00:14:00.000 --> 00:14:02.000
 Terry Nalty, Assistant General Manager at DME.

00:14:02.000 --> 00:14:10.000
 We are, as you may be aware, we did do a little bit of a restructuring of our staff here in the last month.

00:14:10.000 --> 00:14:14.000
 And as a result of that, there is a need for some additional vehicles.

00:14:14.000 --> 00:14:19.000
 And while a couple of those are included in Terry's numbers,

00:14:19.000 --> 00:14:25.000
 we will be bringing a supplemental as part of the budget package to increase the number of line trucks.

00:14:25.000 --> 00:14:33.000
 Part of the reorganization, which we'll talk about, was an outgrowth of the new gen study.

00:14:33.000 --> 00:14:38.000
 We are actually redeploying our crews into smaller crew sizes.

00:14:38.000 --> 00:14:43.000
 And in order to do that, we need a few additional vehicles in order to make them more productive.

00:14:43.000 --> 00:14:49.000
 This all has to do with a high growth rate that we're seeing in line extensions on the distribution side

00:14:49.000 --> 00:14:59.000
 and some ongoing transmission work that we've got a substation work that we'll be hearing about as part of the budget cycle this year.

00:14:59.000 --> 00:15:02.000
 I have another question with regard to safety.

00:15:02.000 --> 00:15:13.000
 Have you had any accidents in the last five years that have been due to a failure of a bucket truck component or anything like that?

00:15:13.000 --> 00:15:17.000
 We have not, knock on wood.

00:15:17.000 --> 00:15:21.000
 You know, as Terry said, ALTEC comes out and does the service work.

00:15:21.000 --> 00:15:25.000
 These trucks are all dielectric protected vehicles.

00:15:25.000 --> 00:15:33.000
 And so that's one of the reasons why we want to maintain the warranty and limit our liability by doing that service work ourselves.

00:15:33.000 --> 00:15:37.000
 That's why we bring ALTEC in.

00:15:37.000 --> 00:15:41.000
 So follow up on Russ, you asked a lot of the same questions I was getting at.

00:15:41.000 --> 00:15:44.000
 We're asked to approve this, and then you're going to tell us why after.

00:15:44.000 --> 00:15:47.000
 It's kind of, I think, an issue.

00:15:47.000 --> 00:15:50.000
 And another agenda item.

00:15:50.000 --> 00:15:57.000
 Well, the other agenda item is basically just an informational item on the replacement process, not specifically geared at these purchases,

00:15:57.000 --> 00:16:03.000
 but overall, you know, how do we arrive at the replacement decisions we do?

00:16:03.000 --> 00:16:07.000
 And I noticed that, I mean, I would assume you don't put a lot of run hours.

00:16:07.000 --> 00:16:09.000
 These don't run all the time, correct?

00:16:09.000 --> 00:16:19.000
 They run, the hours add up on these trucks because they're typically, they drive to the job site and then they're used for that particular job.

00:16:19.000 --> 00:16:22.000
 So mileage, no, but hours, yes.

00:16:22.000 --> 00:16:24.000
 Hours, yes, okay.

00:16:24.000 --> 00:16:28.000
 I noticed you were replacing a 2015 model.

00:16:28.000 --> 00:16:29.000
 Yes.

00:16:29.000 --> 00:16:31.000
 So do you know how many hours?

00:16:31.000 --> 00:16:36.000
 I believe those trucks have somewhere between 7,000 and 8,000 hours on them.

00:16:36.000 --> 00:16:42.000
 And typically, because we remember we're a year out before the new trucks come in,

00:16:42.000 --> 00:16:47.000
 we kind of have to start the process just a little early so that we don't run into problems with those trucks

00:16:47.000 --> 00:16:50.000
 again this next year while we're waiting on the new ones to arrive.

00:16:50.000 --> 00:16:56.000
 And each one of these vehicles and buckets will be to each individual budget, correct?

00:16:56.000 --> 00:16:57.000
 That's correct.

00:16:57.000 --> 00:16:58.000
 Okay.

00:16:58.000 --> 00:17:00.000
 I'm assuming they're already in our budget?

00:17:00.000 --> 00:17:02.000
 They're budgeted for these.

00:17:02.000 --> 00:17:08.000
 These are planned replacements, I'm sorry.

00:17:08.000 --> 00:17:17.000
 In the presentation, I saw a reference, an example of a police department vehicle.

00:17:17.000 --> 00:17:19.000
 You're in charge of that as well, right?

00:17:19.000 --> 00:17:20.000
 Yes, sir.

00:17:20.000 --> 00:17:22.000
 Okay.

00:17:22.000 --> 00:17:24.000
 I'm asking because I don't know.

00:17:24.000 --> 00:17:28.000
 Do you handle all the mobile equipment for the City of Denton?

00:17:28.000 --> 00:17:29.000
 Is that true?

00:17:29.000 --> 00:17:37.000
 Everything, every fleet asset runs through the fleet services department for replacement, for maintenance and repair, and for disposal.

00:17:37.000 --> 00:17:40.000
 I think that'll be covered in that work session.

00:17:40.000 --> 00:17:46.000
 One of the things that Terry is covering is, I don't think he's going to go exhaustively, but he covers all fleet.

00:17:46.000 --> 00:17:56.000
 But he'll be able to kind of give you kind of a snapshot of the number of assets, the amount of just our overall financial picture when it comes to the assets of the fleet.

00:17:56.000 --> 00:18:02.000
 So I think that's coming here in the next few moments.

00:18:02.000 --> 00:18:04.000
 I'll move approval.

00:18:04.000 --> 00:18:08.000
 All those in favor, please say aye.

00:18:08.000 --> 00:18:09.000
 Aye.

00:18:09.000 --> 00:18:10.000
 Any opposed?

00:18:10.000 --> 00:18:11.000
 Say the sign.

00:18:11.000 --> 00:18:13.000
 It passes unanimously.

00:18:13.000 --> 00:18:14.000
 Okay.

00:18:14.000 --> 00:18:18.000
 We'll move on to the ACM update, item C.

00:18:18.000 --> 00:18:20.000
 Yes, good morning again.

00:18:20.000 --> 00:18:28.000
 As far as on the ACM update, we do have attached in the packet the Denton Energy Center 2019, excuse me, December 2019 dashboard.

00:18:28.000 --> 00:18:34.000
 I believe Nick Vincent was here.

00:18:34.000 --> 00:18:35.000
 Okay, well Terry Nalti is here.

00:18:35.000 --> 00:18:36.000
 He can present that.

00:18:36.000 --> 00:18:37.000
 The memo came from Nick.

00:18:37.000 --> 00:18:40.000
 So if you have any questions specific to that.

00:18:40.000 --> 00:18:49.000
 Also, I believe there had been a request made earlier at a previous PUB meeting on the various acronyms used for the Denton Energy Center.

00:18:49.000 --> 00:18:51.000
 That's included in the packet as well.

00:18:51.000 --> 00:18:57.000
 And so Mr. Nalti can explain those if you have any questions regarding that.

00:18:57.000 --> 00:19:03.000
 And I'm just running through these and then we can fall back if you have any specific questions on the previous things reported.

00:19:03.000 --> 00:19:12.000
 Future agendas, as we roll into the spring, you'll be seeing a number of budget items be presented to the Public Utilities Board or the various utilities.

00:19:12.000 --> 00:19:17.000
 So a number of conversations will be coming forward to you over the next number of weeks.

00:19:17.000 --> 00:19:27.000
 And then as far as also too on your report, it mentioned that you would be covering the water and wastewater study that I believe that was actually done earlier this month.

00:19:27.000 --> 00:19:29.000
 So ignore that.

00:19:29.000 --> 00:19:32.000
 I apologize on that on that miss.

00:19:32.000 --> 00:19:41.000
 And then as far as new business based on the presentation that Mr. Cater is presenting here in a few moments, I believe we're up to date on our matrix items.

00:19:41.000 --> 00:19:47.000
 I think there was a tour that was conducted of the facility, a recycling facility.

00:19:47.000 --> 00:19:54.000
 And then the last one was an overview of the decision making process for our fleet replacement process.

00:19:54.000 --> 00:19:58.000
 Outside of that, open it up for any questions of staff.

00:19:58.000 --> 00:20:01.000
 Thank you for the acronyms.

00:20:01.000 --> 00:20:11.000
 That's my last stand on the PB when we had paper for everything, you know, they just had a lip kept adding to the list of acronyms at the front.

00:20:11.000 --> 00:20:16.000
 All right. Well, I guess we're done with the items for individual consideration.

00:20:16.000 --> 00:20:20.000
 Move on to concluding items, which is our work session.

00:20:20.000 --> 00:20:36.000
 Number eight, see report, hold a discussion, provide direction regarding the electric water and wastewater management study performed by new gen strategies and solutions LLC.

00:20:36.000 --> 00:20:53.000
 Banks morning.

00:20:53.000 --> 00:20:57.000
 Morning, board members, Ken Banks, general manager of utilities.

00:20:57.000 --> 00:21:01.000
 I am here today to present to you the utilities management study.

00:21:01.000 --> 00:21:04.000
 This has been a long time coming.

00:21:04.000 --> 00:21:09.000
 Very extensive report and I'm excited to present it to you today.

00:21:09.000 --> 00:21:11.000
 It's a very large piece of work.

00:21:11.000 --> 00:21:15.000
 And so what we have tried to do is kind of get the highlights on it.

00:21:15.000 --> 00:21:21.000
 I'm going to be doing a tag team with Terry Nolte, who will handle the DME side.

00:21:21.000 --> 00:21:26.000
 So we'll be doing a little shuffling back and forth as we work through this presentation.

00:21:26.000 --> 00:21:36.000
 So a couple of things to talk about the management study is a charter requirement and I'll go over that specific language here in a bit.

00:21:36.000 --> 00:21:40.000
 And it is required to be done every 10 years.

00:21:40.000 --> 00:21:49.000
 It's not very descriptive in the charter about what actually has to be done other than it's supposed to be done by an independent and qualified outside entity.

00:21:49.000 --> 00:21:53.000
 And that the results are to be shared with the public once it's completed.

00:21:53.000 --> 00:22:00.000
 So we'll go through a little bit of the management study background, hit the highlights on the findings and recommendations.

00:22:00.000 --> 00:22:06.000
 I want to talk specifically about a follow up survey that we did and go over that a little bit.

00:22:06.000 --> 00:22:12.000
 And then go into our conclusions and talk a little bit about some of the actions that we have taken.

00:22:12.000 --> 00:22:18.000
 This has taken a little over about a year and a half total to get this completed.

00:22:18.000 --> 00:22:28.000
 And so you can imagine as we were starting to work through this and starting to identify things that needed to be looked at, we had already started work on some of those.

00:22:28.000 --> 00:22:34.000
 And we'll be bringing that to your attention at upcoming work sessions.

00:22:34.000 --> 00:22:39.000
 So it is a charter requirement, section 1208(f) of the city charter.

00:22:39.000 --> 00:22:43.000
 You can see the language here, but it does state an interval is not exceeding 10 years.

00:22:43.000 --> 00:22:52.000
 The council shall, at the expense of the utilities involved, cause a general management survey to be made of all utilities under jurisdiction of the board.

00:22:52.000 --> 00:22:57.000
 It's to be done by a competent management consulting or industrial engineering firm.

00:22:57.000 --> 00:23:00.000
 And the report and recommendations shall be made public.

00:23:00.000 --> 00:23:04.000
 So study elements, just a summary here.

00:23:04.000 --> 00:23:08.000
 It's meant to be a very comprehensive study.

00:23:08.000 --> 00:23:26.000
 So you can imagine there's a lot of different elements here, government, organizational structure, financial practices, development policies, an evaluation of the support services that the utility gets, franchise and payment in lieu of taxes, communications, public relations, et cetera, et cetera.

00:23:26.000 --> 00:23:30.000
 So again, the report itself is about 275 pages.

00:23:30.000 --> 00:23:36.000
 And I'll just try to hit the main points and the highlights here as we work through it.

00:23:36.000 --> 00:23:45.000
 So we did retain new GIN strategies to perform this management study of utilities, which involved electric water and wastewater.

00:23:45.000 --> 00:23:50.000
 The project's kickoff was on September the 17th of 2018.

00:23:50.000 --> 00:23:59.000
 And most of the data collection, including the information that was derived from staff interviews, occurred during the fall of 2018.

00:23:59.000 --> 00:24:14.000
 Now, I will say as a general rule, it's not optimal to try to do one of these studies when you are in a situation where there is a lot of organizational evaluation and change going on.

00:24:14.000 --> 00:24:18.000
 But that's where we were back in 2018.

00:24:18.000 --> 00:24:25.000
 And that's why the follow-up survey, I think, is such an important component of this particular study.

00:24:25.000 --> 00:24:37.000
 So basically, the general findings and recommendations, these studies have a tendency to have elements that are in common.

00:24:37.000 --> 00:24:45.000
 And then oftentimes, at least based on the prior two, they will have elements that are specific to a concern at the time.

00:24:45.000 --> 00:24:51.000
 So the 1998 report focused on the electric utility deregulation issue.

00:24:51.000 --> 00:24:56.000
 2008 really focused on cost of shared services.

00:24:56.000 --> 00:25:06.000
 And this particular one, we tried to make it as comprehensive as possible, but not try to focus on any one particular element.

00:25:06.000 --> 00:25:16.000
 And we discussed that at length with the public utility board and with the city council as we were bringing this forward for the approval of the contract.

00:25:16.000 --> 00:25:23.000
 One of the findings that NUGEN had was the 10-year timeframe may be too long.

00:25:23.000 --> 00:25:27.000
 Obviously, a lot of changes can occur in this timeframe.

00:25:27.000 --> 00:25:38.000
 And they were quick to acknowledge that each of the three utilities had experienced or were in the process of experiencing leadership changes.

00:25:38.000 --> 00:25:49.000
 So some of the recommendations just in a general sense were that future studies should align with a more holistic organizational approach as used in the study.

00:25:49.000 --> 00:25:57.000
 Like I said, we really chose to look comprehensively at the organization, but not try to focus on a particular topic.

00:25:57.000 --> 00:26:08.000
 And then basically they stated that we should consider either an internal or external management study at a timeframe that was less than 10 years.

00:26:08.000 --> 00:26:11.000
 They suggested an interim review every five years.

00:26:11.000 --> 00:26:17.000
 And as a part of that interim review, really tracking progress of the recommendations for the previous management study.

00:26:17.000 --> 00:26:24.000
 That had not typically been done or had not been done in the previous studies.

00:26:24.000 --> 00:26:31.000
 So I'll turn it over, with that background, I'll turn it over to Terry to talk a little bit about the electric component.

00:26:31.000 --> 00:26:38.000
 And then I'll pay back up with the water wastewater side.

00:26:38.000 --> 00:26:46.000
 Thanks, Kenny.

00:26:46.000 --> 00:26:49.000
 So I think it's important to put this in perspective.

00:26:49.000 --> 00:26:53.000
 Kenny mentioned that at the time this study was done,

00:26:53.000 --> 00:26:58.000
 it was a period of significant turmoil within DME.

00:26:58.000 --> 00:27:07.000
 You know, since this study was initiated, we've had at least three general managers at DME.

00:27:07.000 --> 00:27:18.000
 And so a lot of the responses from employees, I think there were over 50 employees that were interviewed by NUGEN during the process.

00:27:18.000 --> 00:27:22.000
 You have to take that into account as you look at the results.

00:27:22.000 --> 00:27:32.000
 So and here you see some of the -- we're going to go over some of the very high-level findings of the report as it relates to DME.

00:27:32.000 --> 00:27:34.000
 Good place to work.

00:27:34.000 --> 00:27:38.000
 They found that the people were very capable.

00:27:38.000 --> 00:27:41.000
 We have a very good apprenticeship program on the lineman side.

00:27:41.000 --> 00:27:52.000
 So our apprenticeship program to go from an entry-level lineman through the journeyman level is top notch.

00:27:52.000 --> 00:28:07.000
 At the time, we had just entered the market as a QSE, a qualified scheduling entity around getting ready for the deck to start up and all the renewable contracts that were coming in place.

00:28:07.000 --> 00:28:12.000
 And so one of the findings was that we needed to work on this process to integrate with ERCOT settlements.

00:28:12.000 --> 00:28:13.000
 That's been done.

00:28:13.000 --> 00:28:20.000
 And we've been operating, obviously, since that time, very well.

00:28:20.000 --> 00:28:24.000
 Reliability is what we're after as an electric utility.

00:28:24.000 --> 00:28:31.000
 And NUGEN did look very closely at our reliability numbers.

00:28:31.000 --> 00:28:37.000
 We've experienced high growth but yet our reliability numbers have been very, very good.

00:28:37.000 --> 00:29:01.000
 To give you an example, and here we see some acronyms, again, SAFE and SATE. SAFE is the System Average Interruption Frequency Index, and that's a measure of the frequency of interruptions in electric service.

00:29:01.000 --> 00:29:07.000
 To give you an idea, we were rated at 34.3 is the index.

00:29:07.000 --> 00:29:17.000
 The regional index here in this region is 83.64, so we're less than half of the regional index.

00:29:17.000 --> 00:29:21.000
 And the national index is 242.

00:29:21.000 --> 00:29:29.000
 So on a frequency perspective, much fewer interruptions.

00:29:29.000 --> 00:29:41.000
 The other acronym here is the SATE, the System Average Interruption Duration Index, which as it indicates is the duration of those interruptions when they do happen.

00:29:41.000 --> 00:29:44.000
 Our rating is .74.

00:29:44.000 --> 00:29:49.000
 The regional rating is 1.17, so we're under the region.

00:29:49.000 --> 00:29:57.000
 Nationally, it's 1.57, so we're less than half of what the peer organizations would be on a national basis.

00:29:57.000 --> 00:30:05.000
 Very proud of the performance of the team there.

00:30:05.000 --> 00:30:10.000
 Terry, does that compare to all electric organizations?

00:30:10.000 --> 00:30:12.000
 That would be, it would be just public.

00:30:12.000 --> 00:30:13.000
 Just public, okay.

00:30:13.000 --> 00:30:19.000
 Yes, just public, which typically have better metrics than investor-owned utilities.

00:30:19.000 --> 00:30:22.000
 Yes, public utilities have a little more accountability.

00:30:22.000 --> 00:30:24.000
 That's correct.

00:30:24.000 --> 00:30:30.000
 Communication was one of the areas that they, again, remember what was happening at DME at the time.

00:30:30.000 --> 00:30:38.000
 So communication was an issue that was identified by the consultants as an area for focus.

00:30:38.000 --> 00:30:52.000
 And I think when you think about the way we're structured with support organizations, our, for example, tech services provides all of our IT support.

00:30:52.000 --> 00:30:56.000
 We rely on procurement to do all of our purchasing.

00:30:56.000 --> 00:30:59.000
 Customer service is a separate function.

00:30:59.000 --> 00:31:01.000
 Fleet is a separate function.

00:31:01.000 --> 00:31:06.000
 Real estate, engineering and planning for the city, all separate functions.

00:31:06.000 --> 00:31:14.000
 And as a result of that, better communications amongst those departments was identified as something to work on.

00:31:14.000 --> 00:31:16.000
 We have been working on that.

00:31:16.000 --> 00:31:28.000
 And one of the other recommendations we'll get to in a minute was that the consultants recommended that we go and do an FTE analysis of our organization, which has been completed.

00:31:28.000 --> 00:31:33.000
 And this reorganization was announced about two or three weeks ago.

00:31:33.000 --> 00:32:02.000
 We've added a new position, an executive manager of business services and performance management, and their focus will be to work on these lines of communications amongst departments in the city with DME to make sure that we're better coordinated, as well as tracking performance of both DME as an internally performance, as well as the performance of those support organizations in meeting our needs.

00:32:02.000 --> 00:32:03.000
 >> Question.

00:32:03.000 --> 00:32:04.000
 >> Yes, sir.

00:32:04.000 --> 00:32:10.000
 >> Do your electric engineer -- I see you're doing the field training program, which is fantastic.

00:32:10.000 --> 00:32:11.000
 I hope.

00:32:11.000 --> 00:32:16.000
 Should be real world applications of engineering.

00:32:16.000 --> 00:32:22.000
 Is your engineering staff -- does it fall under your budget or does it fall under the engineering budget and they build back?

00:32:22.000 --> 00:32:23.000
 >> Under ours.

00:32:23.000 --> 00:32:24.000
 >> It is under yours.

00:32:24.000 --> 00:32:29.000
 >> Now, so city engineering, like streets and all the other -- they're a separate department.

00:32:29.000 --> 00:32:36.000
 We work very closely with them, especially when we have electric lines to be relocated or new poles or lights to be put in.

00:32:36.000 --> 00:32:40.000
 We try to coordinate that as tightly as we can.

00:32:40.000 --> 00:32:45.000
 And those are some of the areas that we'll be focusing on trying to improve that efficiency.

00:32:45.000 --> 00:32:58.000
 >> Well, having a lot of experience in finding utilities before they need to be found, DME is the most responsive utility I've ever worked with on any road in any part of this country.

00:32:58.000 --> 00:33:01.000
 >> Okay.

00:33:01.000 --> 00:33:11.000
 The next couple, the silos needed for improved cooperation and issues between engineering and operation.

00:33:11.000 --> 00:33:22.000
 I'll just say that, you know, with new leadership, there's new performance expectations for these functions within our organization.

00:33:22.000 --> 00:33:28.000
 And we're working aggressively to try to improve that coordination and to break down those silos.

00:33:28.000 --> 00:33:38.000
 An example is in our engineering group within DME, we had structured a transmission engineering group and a distribution engineering group.

00:33:38.000 --> 00:33:44.000
 So large transmission projects and substation projects were handled by the transmission group.

00:33:44.000 --> 00:33:52.000
 And the distribution system, the line extensions, the meter services to homes was handled by distribution.

00:33:52.000 --> 00:34:08.000
 That's now all one organization so that we can better coordinate that and ensure that when we're building a substation that the distribution loading on that substation is integral to the development and engineering of that system.

00:34:15.000 --> 00:34:20.000
 One of the recommendations was that we go to a 10-year forecast.

00:34:20.000 --> 00:34:23.000
 We've traditionally done a five-year forecast, financial forecast.

00:34:23.000 --> 00:34:26.000
 That's what we present as part of our budget.

00:34:26.000 --> 00:34:29.000
 We are, in fact, moving to a 10-year forecast.

00:34:29.000 --> 00:34:38.000
 And you'll recall that a month or so ago, you approved a advanced forecasting model for the EMO.

00:34:38.000 --> 00:34:40.000
 That is part of the process here.

00:34:40.000 --> 00:34:44.000
 We have to be able to project revenues 10 years in the future.

00:34:44.000 --> 00:35:02.000
 And because revenues and costs, because so much of our costs are dictated by the market, we have to have a really good way to figure out what those market costs are going to be and to simulate or to project what our load growth and our load demand is going to be out 10 years.

00:35:02.000 --> 00:35:14.000
 That's a pretty complex process and involves both a lot of science and there's some art to it as well.

00:35:14.000 --> 00:35:18.000
 Debt service coverage ratio.

00:35:18.000 --> 00:35:21.000
 I'm not going to spend a lot of time on this one.

00:35:21.000 --> 00:35:40.000
 The Fitch rating or the Fitch debt service rating of 2.1 median, you have to understand that that median number would be for all utilities that are rated, so both water, electric, wastewater, and on a national basis.

00:35:40.000 --> 00:35:45.000
 Debt coverage ratios, for those of you, I know, Charlie, you're in the financial business.

00:35:45.000 --> 00:35:51.000
 Susan has been involved in finance for public utilities.

00:35:51.000 --> 00:36:01.000
 You know, when you are in the debt market, placing additional debt in the market, these metrics are critical.

00:36:01.000 --> 00:36:15.000
 And typically, most public utilities will use revenue bonds for issuing debt, and revenue bonds pledge the revenues of the utility to the bondholders.

00:36:15.000 --> 00:36:17.000
 We don't use that except for the DEC.

00:36:17.000 --> 00:36:19.000
 The DEC has revenue bonds against it.

00:36:19.000 --> 00:36:28.000
 We typically use GOs and COs, which don't pledge those revenues, and so these metrics are a little bit of apples and oranges.

00:36:28.000 --> 00:36:37.000
 That 2.1 metric is what I would call a revenue bond metric, not a GO-CO metric.

00:36:37.000 --> 00:36:49.000
 As I look at our five-year forecast, our typical projected debt coverage ratio is between 1.2 and 1.5.

00:36:49.000 --> 00:36:57.000
 The lowest year that we're projecting now is about 1.15 in 2023.

00:36:57.000 --> 00:37:12.000
 To the extent we need to go issue additional debt, we might want to look at that a little closer and try to get ready for issuing that debt, maybe get it up a little bit higher.

00:37:12.000 --> 00:37:31.000
 Working capital for enterprise funds, we're going through a process now as we do each year when we put our budgets together to look at our capital improvement projects and look at whether we've got adequate funding for those projects or not.

00:37:31.000 --> 00:37:50.000
 We'll be back before this board in the next three to four months with that capital spending plan and be making recommendations on how to fund it.

00:37:50.000 --> 00:37:52.000
 What is the acronym GFOA?

00:37:52.000 --> 00:37:56.000
 That's not on our list.

00:37:56.000 --> 00:38:01.000
 I can answer that. Government Finance Officers of America.

00:38:01.000 --> 00:38:11.000
 It's a national association for government finance officers, finance directors, CFOs of government entities.

00:38:11.000 --> 00:38:26.000
 We typically run, one of the metrics is days cash on hand. We typically run around 75 days cash on hand in the electric utility. I think the water and wastewater utilities are a little higher than that.

00:38:26.000 --> 00:38:37.000
 But that's what we try to manage on.

00:38:37.000 --> 00:38:46.000
 Morale, as I mentioned, you have to take into account the timing of when this study was done. Morale was low.

00:38:46.000 --> 00:39:14.000
 If you look at the recommendations,

00:39:14.000 --> 00:39:24.000
 So on the recommendations, the first one that utility leadership must help the organization continue to move to a better future by establishing clear goals and objectives.

00:39:24.000 --> 00:39:29.000
 Obviously, our reorganization is focused on that.

00:39:29.000 --> 00:39:35.000
 We've had significant movement in this area through that restructuring.

00:39:35.000 --> 00:39:45.000
 We've elevated and made sure that all employees in the organization understand that transparency is of paramount importance.

00:39:45.000 --> 00:40:06.000
 We don't have any secrets at DME with the exception of those things that are specifically allowed under the statutes. That would be disciplinary action and legal matters and then anything that's competitive in nature.

00:40:06.000 --> 00:40:18.000
 So we've moved quite a ways. Skip level management meetings have been ongoing.

00:40:18.000 --> 00:40:26.000
 Tony Quente now meets regularly with frontline employees on every quarter.

00:40:26.000 --> 00:40:43.000
 Just about every employee in DME has an opportunity to talk to Tony and myself on a quarterly basis one-on-one without their supervisors there to bring up any issues that they may not be confident in speaking about in front of their direct managers.

00:40:43.000 --> 00:40:47.000
 And we've identified some things that need work.

00:40:47.000 --> 00:41:05.000
 Part of the reorganization was focused on that. So we've been working hard on trying to increase that level of communication and to move that morale back to a more positive perspective.

00:41:05.000 --> 00:41:10.000
 Succession planning is an area where we need to continue to work on.

00:41:10.000 --> 00:41:20.000
 We have identified for our key leadership positions a succession plan, but we're moving that down into the organization.

00:41:20.000 --> 00:41:33.000
 It's important that people can leave to take other jobs, family issues can move them away from the job for several months at a time, and we have to be able to continue to operate.

00:41:33.000 --> 00:41:37.000
 And so succession planning is something that we are working hard to.

00:41:37.000 --> 00:41:50.000
 This is one of those things that's hard to balance because succession planning typically means you've got to have some bench strength, additional FTEs, and we're trying to control costs.

00:41:50.000 --> 00:42:04.000
 So we want to have things staffed at the right level, not overstaffed, but at the same time ensure that we have that succession in place.

00:42:04.000 --> 00:42:15.000
 So this last one, turnover, resource allocation and acquisition, at the time that the survey was done, there were a number of open positions.

00:42:15.000 --> 00:42:22.000
 Many of those were a result of what happened at DME at that time, and they weren't being filled.

00:42:22.000 --> 00:42:33.000
 Since this time, we've gone back and either eliminated a number of positions or shifted them into other organizations so that we are now -- we do have some open positions.

00:42:33.000 --> 00:42:43.000
 Through just turnover, the reorganization has created a couple of new positions that we are looking to.

00:42:43.000 --> 00:42:45.000
 One is safety.

00:42:45.000 --> 00:42:48.000
 We have a heightened focus on safety.

00:42:48.000 --> 00:43:02.000
 We're getting ready to hire a safety manager, and that will be somebody with qualifications from the outside with a certified professional safety manager because we don't have people internally that have that qualification.

00:43:02.000 --> 00:43:20.000
 So we've been working very diligently to try to make sure that our positions are either filled or eliminated if they're not being filled.

00:43:20.000 --> 00:43:22.000
 Procedures and technical specifications.

00:43:22.000 --> 00:43:29.000
 We are in the midst of revamping our electrical service standards and our joint use standards.

00:43:29.000 --> 00:43:33.000
 These are documents that have some age on them now.

00:43:33.000 --> 00:43:37.000
 We anticipate in this calendar year we'll finish both of those.

00:43:37.000 --> 00:43:46.000
 Joint use standards is things like 5G poles and poles that we share with other utilities.

00:43:46.000 --> 00:43:48.000
 Strategic planning.

00:43:48.000 --> 00:43:57.000
 We will be bringing forward in the next budget cycle an item to do a comprehensive strategic plan for DME.

00:43:57.000 --> 00:44:04.000
 That plan, as we currently envision it and we're scoping it, would involve a significant level of public input as well.

00:44:04.000 --> 00:44:26.000
 We need to figure out how to position DME for the next 10 years, next 15 years, and that's going to take some investment in things like electric vehicle charging stations, understanding how that's going to impact our system, the use of more and more automated controls on our distribution and transmission system, things like that.

00:44:26.000 --> 00:44:33.000
 With that, if you don't have any other questions, I'm going to turn it back over.

00:44:33.000 --> 00:44:50.000
 Regarding the strategic planning, are there any plans or do you feel it would be advantageous for -- and this also goes along with communication between departments.

00:44:50.000 --> 00:45:02.000
 Forecasts for the next 40 to 60 years in terms of changes in climate indicate that there are going to be a lot more hotter days.

00:45:02.000 --> 00:45:30.000
 And what I'm asking, I guess, is there a communication between DME and, say, people in the sustainability and energy conservation areas to hash out what would be a strategic plan, not for three to five years, but just a forecast of looking out and seeing what's coming down the pike.

00:45:30.000 --> 00:45:38.000
 Say within a 40-year, 35 to 40-year framework and how that would affect everything.

00:45:38.000 --> 00:45:45.000
 Yeah, I guess it's a hard question to answer except to say that we don't plan 40 years in the future.

00:45:45.000 --> 00:45:54.000
 Our planning horizon is more like 10 years because we have to be cognizant of the practicality of technical advancements.

00:45:54.000 --> 00:46:04.000
 You know, I read an article this weekend about a new fusion technology that's -- you know, that could potentially be commercial in 50 years.

00:46:04.000 --> 00:46:06.000
 Do we plan on that?

00:46:06.000 --> 00:46:08.000
 Not likely.

00:46:08.000 --> 00:46:10.000
 We're not going to plan on that today.

00:46:10.000 --> 00:46:36.000
 With regard to hotter temperatures, our advanced forecasting models will, in fact, be stress tested to look at those types of situations to see if we do see three, five-degree temperature on average increases over the next decade, what does that do to our power supply needs and our demand that we're going to have to meet.

00:46:36.000 --> 00:46:47.000
 So we are actively taking those types of parameters into account.

00:46:47.000 --> 00:46:49.000
 You said you were going to pass this on?

00:46:49.000 --> 00:46:50.000
 Yes.

00:46:50.000 --> 00:46:51.000
 To Dr. Banks, I guess.

00:46:51.000 --> 00:47:01.000
 Thanks, Terry.

00:47:01.000 --> 00:47:12.000
 Okay, with regards to water and wastewater, very similar format as you just saw with DME, so we'll work through this here pretty rapidly.

00:47:12.000 --> 00:47:19.000
 Findings were good places -- good place to work, loyal staff, people enjoy working here.

00:47:19.000 --> 00:47:29.000
 At the time, the project management office was a fairly new concept and was being developed, and it's much more sophisticated now than it was.

00:47:29.000 --> 00:47:44.000
 But one of the findings that we had was really about concern over capital delivery and not obligating funds for capital projects years in advance of when the project actually got completed.

00:47:44.000 --> 00:48:13.000
 And so the intention of the comment and then part of the intention of the project management office is to try to close that gap so that we are basically either obligating funds out of our operating fund or incurring debt when the project is needed and not keeping those funds around for a long period of time with projects that either were delayed or the timing wasn't exactly right on them.

00:48:13.000 --> 00:48:19.000
 So more data-driven focus was another part of that.

00:48:19.000 --> 00:48:25.000
 On infrastructure, they noted that we had an award-winning drinking water quality.

00:48:25.000 --> 00:48:34.000
 We had just, if you all recall, had one -- or placed in the best tasting water in Texas, and so that was kind of big on everybody's list.

00:48:34.000 --> 00:48:41.000
 And then the number of wastewater spills compared to where we were prior to the administrative order was substantially lower.

00:48:41.000 --> 00:48:45.000
 So a couple of common threads here.

00:48:45.000 --> 00:48:51.000
 The first one is improved communication to external stakeholders.

00:48:51.000 --> 00:49:00.000
 And basically the idea was to implement a formal stakeholder engagement process that is ongoing and comprehensive.

00:49:00.000 --> 00:49:08.000
 And then to really figure out how we could interact most effectively with our elected and appointed officials.

00:49:08.000 --> 00:49:20.000
 In terms of communication, communication with other city departments was noted and certainly something that we knew at the time needed to be improved.

00:49:20.000 --> 00:49:28.000
 And so their recommendation was to have initial monthly meetings with each city department, with the utility interface.

00:49:28.000 --> 00:49:32.000
 We have since put those meetings together.

00:49:32.000 --> 00:49:41.000
 We are meeting with other departments on a very regular basis, particularly in areas where we know there are -- there's a significant workload,

00:49:41.000 --> 00:49:49.000
 a very high degree of importance to the organization, and a need for us to continue to improve communication.

00:49:49.000 --> 00:49:58.000
 So, for example, development services is one that we have really been reaching out lately to not only improve the basic communication

00:49:58.000 --> 00:50:04.000
 and make sure we're coordinating efficiently, but also to help everyone learn more about what the other group does.

00:50:04.000 --> 00:50:10.000
 So there's a greater, more comprehensive understanding of how those two groups operate.

00:50:10.000 --> 00:50:16.000
 In terms of public relations, this is another issue that I think is very important for us.

00:50:16.000 --> 00:50:23.000
 The utilities on the water and wastewater side have had a tendency to kind of, for lack of a better word,

00:50:23.000 --> 00:50:28.000
 put their head down, get the job done, and not be out and actively promoting.

00:50:28.000 --> 00:50:37.000
 But at the -- one of the things that was pointed out was that we, I think, have kind of -- I think in today's age,

00:50:37.000 --> 00:50:44.000
 we need to have a lot more information out so that people have an understanding of what those utilities really do

00:50:44.000 --> 00:50:53.000
 and how comprehensive those utilities are, how many miles of pipe we have, how extensive our water and wastewater resources are.

00:50:53.000 --> 00:50:57.000
 And admittedly, we have not done a great job in getting that information out.

00:50:57.000 --> 00:51:02.000
 And so we've been working actively with the Public Communication Office, and y'all may have seen

00:51:02.000 --> 00:51:09.000
 and will continue to see an attempt to try to continue to get that message out.

00:51:09.000 --> 00:51:17.000
 So our citizen updates, our city limits, all of those types of avenues we're looking at,

00:51:17.000 --> 00:51:23.000
 to just get a greater media footprint and really tell our story better.

00:51:23.000 --> 00:51:28.000
 So capital project education is a part of that.

00:51:28.000 --> 00:51:37.000
 It's really important for us to be able to convey why we need our capital projects at the time that we need them.

00:51:37.000 --> 00:51:41.000
 Utilities are very, very expensive.

00:51:41.000 --> 00:51:50.000
 We need to not only time our obligation of debt or application of revenues appropriately.

00:51:50.000 --> 00:51:57.000
 We also really need to tell everybody why we're doing this and why it's needed so that folks understand

00:51:57.000 --> 00:52:01.000
 that these projects have been well planned, they've been well thought out.

00:52:01.000 --> 00:52:10.000
 One of the key issues that we've been working on on this and we continue to build out is our asset management program for water.

00:52:10.000 --> 00:52:15.000
 We did not have a very good asset management program at the time this survey was done.

00:52:15.000 --> 00:52:21.000
 We had a better program on the wastewater side, but we were not using it to its full potential.

00:52:21.000 --> 00:52:27.000
 And we have devoted significant resources towards getting an asset management program for water

00:52:27.000 --> 00:52:31.000
 and really bolstering up our asset management program for wastewater.

00:52:31.000 --> 00:52:33.000
 And that's twofold.

00:52:33.000 --> 00:52:43.000
 One, it helps us make better decisions, but also it helps us make sure that we are managing towards the remaining useful life of these assets.

00:52:43.000 --> 00:52:46.000
 So we don't replace something too soon.

00:52:46.000 --> 00:52:55.000
 And at the same time, we are keeping the network replaced at a degree that the asset management program is telling us to,

00:52:55.000 --> 00:52:58.000
 so our reliability doesn't suffer.

00:52:58.000 --> 00:53:03.000
 So execution of capital planning, I've talked about a little bit already.

00:53:03.000 --> 00:53:12.000
 Basically, we have wholesale revamped our way in which we do capital planning and interactions,

00:53:12.000 --> 00:53:19.000
 especially with the streets department and some of our upcoming bond programs.

00:53:19.000 --> 00:53:27.000
 That communication and that coordination has been greatly improved compared to where it was when this survey was done.

00:53:27.000 --> 00:53:36.000
 Utilities rate group, one of their recommendations was to form a utilities rate group comprised of utilities and finance staff.

00:53:36.000 --> 00:53:37.000
 We've done that.

00:53:37.000 --> 00:53:44.000
 And then there was a need to do long-term rate plans that included multiple scenarios.

00:53:44.000 --> 00:53:48.000
 And then basically do ten-year financial forecasts at a minimum.

00:53:48.000 --> 00:53:59.000
 We have been doing that since in the time between when this information was collected and when the report was finalized.

00:53:59.000 --> 00:54:05.000
 This is a particularly important issue for us because we've got a plant expansion on the horizon,

00:54:05.000 --> 00:54:13.000
 and it's going to be a very large capital program for the water department to undertake.

00:54:13.000 --> 00:54:18.000
 The next one, improving the timeliness of capital spending, we've talked about already.

00:54:18.000 --> 00:54:23.000
 Basically, the idea there is just to make sure that we have the right projects at the right time

00:54:23.000 --> 00:54:27.000
 and that we're not obligating funds that are just going to sit somewhere in an account.

00:54:27.000 --> 00:54:33.000
 And then the debt service coverage ratio for Fitch, Cherry talked about that quite a bit,

00:54:33.000 --> 00:54:41.000
 and I just want to point out that what they're referring to there is an ordinance that was put in place in 2002

00:54:41.000 --> 00:54:48.000
 that said the minimum debt service coverage ratio for the funds would not be below 1.25.

00:54:48.000 --> 00:54:56.000
 Traditionally, on our water and wastewater funds, we are going to be in excess of the 2.1 that's recommended for Fitch.

00:54:56.000 --> 00:55:03.000
 And when you go through the budget process, you'll actually see on the five-year proformas that we provide every year,

00:55:03.000 --> 00:55:09.000
 we actually include that calculation down at the bottom for both the water and wastewater funds.

00:55:09.000 --> 00:55:15.000
 So you can see exactly where we are at with regards to our debt service coverage ratio.

00:55:15.000 --> 00:55:24.000
 Long-term forecasting, we do a long-term forecast in terms of volume consumption.

00:55:24.000 --> 00:55:34.000
 And in turn, that helps us to plan for plant capacity and also for our ability to -- our need, rather, for water rights.

00:55:34.000 --> 00:55:39.000
 And so we do that on a more than 20-year forecast cycle,

00:55:39.000 --> 00:55:44.000
 but we typically don't put financials into anything that's more than about a 10-year.

00:55:44.000 --> 00:55:48.000
 And their recommendation was to look at doing a 20-year with financials.

00:55:48.000 --> 00:55:52.000
 I think it's not a bad recommendation from a planning perspective,

00:55:52.000 --> 00:56:00.000
 but you can imagine that it's pretty hard to predict the future, and going out 20 years is pretty difficult to do with accuracy.

00:56:00.000 --> 00:56:06.000
 So I think it's a good planning tool. I just think it needs to be considered within its context.

00:56:06.000 --> 00:56:12.000
 The service delivery backlog relates to the capital projects that I was referring to.

00:56:12.000 --> 00:56:18.000
 We are making significant headway on those capital projects and looking forward,

00:56:18.000 --> 00:56:23.000
 really taking efforts to make sure, again, that we don't obligate funds before those funds are needed.

00:56:23.000 --> 00:56:30.000
 And then the working capital target for the enterprise funds.

00:56:30.000 --> 00:56:35.000
 Basically, we have an 8% working capital requirement,

00:56:35.000 --> 00:56:47.000
 and then we have a reserve requirement of 120 to 180 days of operating expense on the water side and 100 to 140 on the wastewater side.

00:56:47.000 --> 00:56:53.000
 So those were derived by looking at our worst-performing years of the last 20 years,

00:56:53.000 --> 00:57:01.000
 and basically doing some simulation models to simulate what it would look like if we happened to get those years back-to-back-to-back,

00:57:01.000 --> 00:57:09.000
 and basically planning for effectively being able to weather at least two,

00:57:09.000 --> 00:57:19.000
 and depending on severity, closer to three of our worst-performing years back-to-back before we would fall below our working capital thresholds.

00:57:19.000 --> 00:57:25.000
 So we are continuing to work on that and refine it.

00:57:25.000 --> 00:57:31.000
 Succession planning is something that we've just now started working on with human resources.

00:57:31.000 --> 00:57:39.000
 I will say that getting down to the training program for utility operations and management at the bottom,

00:57:39.000 --> 00:57:46.000
 we have significantly increased our training activities and really taken a look at training needs.

00:57:46.000 --> 00:57:53.000
 And one of the things that we really tried to work on is making sure that we have a large number of our workforce

00:57:53.000 --> 00:58:01.000
 that have operator licenses on either the water or wastewater side or both through TCEQ.

00:58:01.000 --> 00:58:11.000
 So that's one thing that we've really been trying to work on with field personnel all the way up through the upper management.

00:58:11.000 --> 00:58:19.000
 There were definitely, at the time, silos existing between water and wastewater,

00:58:19.000 --> 00:58:24.000
 both between the two major funds and then internally within each of the utilities.

00:58:24.000 --> 00:58:31.000
 We've undertaken a couple of reorganizations to deal with or try to improve those issues.

00:58:31.000 --> 00:58:36.000
 We're doing a large amount of training of the management group.

00:58:36.000 --> 00:58:45.000
 One of the fundamental things that we've really focused on is the idea of not having a --

00:58:45.000 --> 00:58:54.000
 keeping the budgetary aspects of the funds separate, but the management of those funds is no longer all management on water

00:58:54.000 --> 00:58:58.000
 and all management on wastewater. It's combined together.

00:58:58.000 --> 00:59:06.000
 So we have now Frank, who is director of water and wastewater and focusing on plant operations.

00:59:06.000 --> 00:59:16.000
 And then we have Becky Devaney, who is the deputy director of strategic operations and capital delivery for water and wastewater.

00:59:16.000 --> 00:59:22.000
 So it's just a fundamental shift in the way that the organization is run.

00:59:22.000 --> 00:59:29.000
 So resource allocation, we have done FTE analyses ourselves.

00:59:29.000 --> 00:59:35.000
 And one of the things that we did in this last budget cycle, which gets back to some of the capital programs,

00:59:35.000 --> 00:59:43.000
 is we did get a number of FTEs in the current budget cycle approved that are dedicated towards capital projects.

00:59:43.000 --> 00:59:52.000
 And then the resistance to change, like I said, it's probably not optimal to do a once every 10-year management study

00:59:52.000 --> 00:59:57.000
 in the midst of some fairly significant organizational changes.

00:59:57.000 --> 01:00:03.000
 There were some struggles that were going on, and there are still a few struggles that are there.

01:00:03.000 --> 01:00:11.000
 But I believe we've made a lot of headway in dealing with these struggles and helping to work through them.

01:00:11.000 --> 01:00:15.000
 I think the reorganization was a key issue in dealing with that.

01:00:15.000 --> 01:00:23.000
 And I also think that the training that we're undertaking as a management group with all of the managers at the table

01:00:23.000 --> 01:00:32.000
 is really important to making sure that our organization is quick and basically can change on a dime as we need.

01:00:32.000 --> 01:00:38.000
 And not involved in this idea of resisting the change that's occurring.

01:00:38.000 --> 01:00:46.000
 So strategic planning, we do need to go through a formal strategic planning.

01:00:46.000 --> 01:00:53.000
 We have a lot of informal strategic planning that goes on, but we really need to formalize that.

01:00:53.000 --> 01:00:55.000
 And that's something that we will be looking at.

01:00:55.000 --> 01:01:00.000
 Technology could play a larger role, and we are taking a look at that.

01:01:00.000 --> 01:01:07.000
 We've done a significant amount of work on our SCADA system since this was done.

01:01:07.000 --> 01:01:17.000
 We are taking a look at and plan to do some heavier evaluation on the automated meter reading component to see what that might look like.

01:01:17.000 --> 01:01:24.000
 And then automation of the meter shop is something that we have on our list to take a look at.

01:01:24.000 --> 01:01:35.000
 Our GIS and asset management group has been reconfigured with this reorganization, and so we're actively working on building that group up.

01:01:35.000 --> 01:01:43.000
 So basically, one of the things that I wanted to talk about is the follow-up survey,

01:01:43.000 --> 01:01:49.000
 because we really felt when we were putting this together that we needed to have a sense --

01:01:49.000 --> 01:01:57.000
 we had a pretty good sense of where the organization was when the data was collected in the fall of 2018.

01:01:57.000 --> 01:02:06.000
 We really wanted to see what employee perspectives were like after the changes had occurred.

01:02:06.000 --> 01:02:15.000
 And so in late fall of last year, we actually put a survey out to the same group of 50 participants

01:02:15.000 --> 01:02:24.000
 that the management study -- or management group, NUGEN, had interviewed during the process of putting this study together.

01:02:24.000 --> 01:02:31.000
 There were only three of those individuals out of the 50 that had left the organization in the time frame.

01:02:31.000 --> 01:02:40.000
 And so it was still, in my opinion, a sizable group, not enough to swing the needle one way or the other.

01:02:40.000 --> 01:02:45.000
 And so in fall of 2019, the survey was put out there.

01:02:45.000 --> 01:02:52.000
 And part of the reason it's taken us a little bit longer to do this one was that was not a part of the original scope.

01:02:52.000 --> 01:02:56.000
 But we felt it was important, and we had enough capacity to be able to do it.

01:02:56.000 --> 01:03:06.000
 And so I don't want to speak for electric, so I'll look over at Terry if he wants to weigh in on this.

01:03:06.000 --> 01:03:10.000
 But essentially, we had a 1 to 5 scale.

01:03:10.000 --> 01:03:23.000
 And basically, the participants were asked to think back to the responses that they gave during their interview process back in the fall of 2018

01:03:23.000 --> 01:03:34.000
 and just basically give an indication of whether they thought things were the same, worse, much worse, somewhat better, or better.

01:03:34.000 --> 01:03:43.000
 And you can see that overall, there is a pretty significant amount of green and blue on all of the graphs,

01:03:43.000 --> 01:03:53.000
 indicating that staff believes that things are somewhat better to better compared to where they were a year prior when this information was collected.

01:03:53.000 --> 01:04:00.000
 So overall average, most scores were ranked right around 4, which would indicate somewhat better.

01:04:00.000 --> 01:04:04.000
 Yes. What does infrastructure represent?

01:04:04.000 --> 01:04:10.000
 Basically, yes, I probably need to clarify on a few of these things.

01:04:10.000 --> 01:04:18.000
 Infrastructure just represents whether or not the staff believes that the infrastructure in the field,

01:04:18.000 --> 01:04:27.000
 the planning that we're doing, and the way that we're managing our infrastructure is better, worse, or hasn't changed compared to where we were a year ago.

01:04:27.000 --> 01:04:38.000
 So it's a combination of what's actually in the SAS perspective of what's in the field, as well as how we're managing those assets.

01:04:38.000 --> 01:04:41.000
 So hopefully, does that make sense?

01:04:41.000 --> 01:04:44.000
 Are you talking about physical assets?

01:04:44.000 --> 01:04:46.000
 I am, yes.

01:04:46.000 --> 01:04:49.000
 For water and wastewater, it would be pipes, plants.

01:04:49.000 --> 01:04:55.000
 For DME, it would be transmission assets, substations, et cetera.

01:04:55.000 --> 01:05:03.000
 So I do also want to point out that --

01:05:03.000 --> 01:05:05.000
 Not the PUB leadership.

01:05:05.000 --> 01:05:07.000
 Yeah. I thought I -- yeah.

01:05:07.000 --> 01:05:14.000
 But keep in mind, just before anybody gets too excited about that, our PUB has changed.

01:05:14.000 --> 01:05:19.000
 So yeah, that doesn't mean that it -- yeah, it doesn't mean that it's bad.

01:05:19.000 --> 01:05:21.000
 So anyway --

01:05:21.000 --> 01:05:23.000
 There's no red there anyway.

01:05:23.000 --> 01:05:25.000
 That's right.

01:05:25.000 --> 01:05:32.000
 So going over to water and wastewater, pretty much the same story.

01:05:32.000 --> 01:05:40.000
 A little bit higher in terms of the overall averages, so you see a little bit more blue and green.

01:05:40.000 --> 01:05:52.000
 But overall, quite a large improvement in just the expanse of approximately one year.

01:05:52.000 --> 01:06:02.000
 So shared services is basically reflective of all of those types of things that we use in the organization.

01:06:02.000 --> 01:06:09.000
 So information technology, human resources, our legal department, procurement department.

01:06:09.000 --> 01:06:27.000
 And basically looking at how -- the question was basically asked, how do you view the shared services with regards to these elements that are over here on the left?

01:06:27.000 --> 01:06:30.000
 Person that was interviewed the last time.

01:06:30.000 --> 01:06:40.000
 And so basically response to change has improved, communications improved, the financial components of it improved, et cetera, et cetera.

01:06:40.000 --> 01:06:50.000
 So I just wanted to point that out because it's a little bit of a strange graph if you don't understand what the shared services is actually representing.

01:06:50.000 --> 01:07:03.000
 So if no one has any questions on that, we've got a couple of results from the benchmarking that the consultant felt were important and key issues to point out.

01:07:03.000 --> 01:07:15.000
 So I can turn it over to Terry to do the electric side of this and then I'll come back for the water and wastewater.

01:07:15.000 --> 01:07:21.000
 Okay. On the rate side, there was benchmarking done to look at our rates.

01:07:21.000 --> 01:07:28.000
 And we also benchmark our rates against competitive suppliers in the ERCOT market.

01:07:28.000 --> 01:07:32.000
 And the last results that we've seen were right in the middle of the pack.

01:07:32.000 --> 01:07:42.000
 Our rates are just right about at the 50th percentile of all competitive offerings in the competitive retail market surrounding Denton.

01:07:42.000 --> 01:07:47.000
 So we feel pretty good about where our rates are today.

01:07:47.000 --> 01:07:48.000
 Yes, ma'am.

01:07:48.000 --> 01:07:52.000
 In the past, we have seen a graph showing where we rate.

01:07:52.000 --> 01:07:55.000
 Will we get some of that in the future?

01:07:55.000 --> 01:07:56.000
 Yes, ma'am.

01:07:56.000 --> 01:07:58.000
 That's part of our budget presentation each year.

01:07:58.000 --> 01:08:08.000
 We usually produce that for both comparing our rates to other municipally owned systems as well as to competitive retailers and be glad to supply them.

01:08:08.000 --> 01:08:12.000
 We do them -- we produce them quarterly.

01:08:12.000 --> 01:08:18.000
 And if PB would like them, we can certainly provide that information to you.

01:08:18.000 --> 01:08:25.000
 You know, I'd say overall, our rates are average.

01:08:25.000 --> 01:08:36.000
 Our rates are really broken into two components, base rates, which is the recovery of fixed costs, and then the ECA, the energy cost adjustment rate.

01:08:36.000 --> 01:08:41.000
 And again, we will be bringing that information as part of the overall budget.

01:08:41.000 --> 01:08:45.000
 We've got some work to do to kind of realign some of those.

01:08:45.000 --> 01:08:52.000
 We are currently over collecting on the base rate side, and we're under collecting on the ECA side.

01:08:52.000 --> 01:09:02.000
 The ECA is the one that is the riskiest of them all because it really is our cost to procure the energy from the market.

01:09:02.000 --> 01:09:07.000
 And that can vary significantly from year to year.

01:09:07.000 --> 01:09:19.000
 It's envisioned as an adjuster, like a fuel adjustment provision, where it could move month to month as our expenses for purchase power move month to month.

01:09:19.000 --> 01:09:32.000
 However, traditionally, we've not done that at DME. This board and the City Council have tried to keep those rates as stable as possible.

01:09:32.000 --> 01:09:44.000
 A couple of the things that they bring up is ensure adequate fixed cost recovery, given the nationwide trend in the growth of customer-cited distribution energy resources.

01:09:44.000 --> 01:09:54.000
 In plain English, that means rooftop solar. As rooftop solar becomes more and more prolific and penetrates our markets,

01:09:54.000 --> 01:10:11.000
 the rate structure that we pay to owners of those facilities that are producing extra energy and putting it back into our system can create problems for us in terms of adequate cost of recovery.

01:10:11.000 --> 01:10:20.000
 If you think about it, if you have a rooftop solar facility, when the sun's not shining, we still have a fiduciary obligation to provide power.

01:10:20.000 --> 01:10:39.000
 And on a hot day that the sun is cloudy, but it's hot, humid, I still have to maintain the same poles, wires, transformers, capacitors as I would for any other resident with or without solar energy.

01:10:39.000 --> 01:10:49.000
 So as that becomes more and more of an issue in markets, we've seen that there could be an under recovery of those fixed costs.

01:10:49.000 --> 01:11:01.000
 And we have plans later this year to bring some revisions to our rate book to try to address that issue.

01:11:01.000 --> 01:11:13.000
 Expenses, you know, they state that expenses are higher costs and ratios, especially on a per mile of distribution basis.

01:11:13.000 --> 01:11:30.000
 We're looking into that, suspect that much of that is a result of the shared services structure where DME pays for legal purchasing information technology to other departments.

01:11:30.000 --> 01:11:45.000
 And as we look at how efficient that might be compared to self-providing that and from that type of service, that could be one of the reasons why our GNA function costs are a little higher.

01:11:45.000 --> 01:12:01.000
 Liquidity, as I mentioned, days cash on hand, typically 60 to 75 days cash on hand, that's considered sufficient in our industry. Obviously, we'd like to have more, but that's a rate issue.

01:12:01.000 --> 01:12:15.000
 You have to fund that reserve account from rates, from rate revenue, and so we're trying to balance the low rates with the need to have additional liquidity.

01:12:15.000 --> 01:12:31.000
 On collectibles, at the time that this particular study was done, it showed a decline in collections. You may recall, I think in the last several months, you've been talked to about the prepay program.

01:12:31.000 --> 01:12:36.000
 And as part of that, collectibles have actually gone up last year.

01:12:36.000 --> 01:12:42.000
 We're hoping they're headed down now as a result of that prepayment program.

01:12:42.000 --> 01:12:50.000
 And in load growth trends, we are still what I would consider seeing high load growth relative to the rest of the country.

01:12:50.000 --> 01:13:14.000
 We, in our projections, we project between 1.75 and about 2.25% load growth per year. The rest of the country outside of Texas is really load growth of zero. And that's really driven by higher efficiency appliances, lighting.

01:13:14.000 --> 01:13:25.000
 We have LED lights now that use 1/20 of the power that a traditional light bulb would use.

01:13:25.000 --> 01:13:39.000
 So the rest of the country's experience of load stabilization, we are continuing to experience load growth as a result of the development here in Denton.

01:13:39.000 --> 01:13:47.000
 I think that's all I have, unless you have any questions.

01:13:47.000 --> 01:13:54.000
 It says, if DME instituted a new policy to reduce bad debt in 2017, it appears to be working.

01:13:54.000 --> 01:13:59.000
 Did DME institute a new policy to reduce bad debt in 2017?

01:13:59.000 --> 01:14:05.000
 I don't know the answer to that question. I apologize. I would have to have someone from customer service here to answer that question.

01:14:05.000 --> 01:14:32.000
 That's not a reference to the prepay? No, it's not. The prepay came into effect earlier this year, late last year.

01:14:32.000 --> 01:14:49.000
 We did revise the bad debt policy. I can get you a little bit further information about that, exactly how it affected DME.

01:14:49.000 --> 01:14:54.000
 Okay. Just a few key issues here on the benchmarking.

01:14:54.000 --> 01:15:07.000
 In terms of the effective rate, basically it was pointed out that we should just continue to work towards attaining a balance between reasonable rates and then basically financial sustainability.

01:15:07.000 --> 01:15:18.000
 That is something that we look at as a part of every budget process, and you'll see our rates compared to others, as mentioned, as part of the budget process.

01:15:18.000 --> 01:15:32.000
 One of the things that I do want to point out is that this information was collected and the recommendation was made prior to us taking a real hard look at both water and wastewater.

01:15:32.000 --> 01:16:01.000
 With wastewater, we implemented a 5% rate reduction that occurred starting this FY19, and then basically the water fund has remained at a zero rate increase for the last couple of years, which essentially, if you look at a CPI adjuster, is somewhere between a 2 to 2.5% rate decrease effective in terms of your buying power.

01:16:01.000 --> 01:16:15.000
 So we'll show the board as a part of the budget process where we stack up against our competitors in the Metroplex, and you can see exactly where we're at.

01:16:15.000 --> 01:16:30.000
 In terms of liquidity, we've talked about the reserves, and they felt that we had operated our reserves in a manner that would be able to ensure that we could pay our short- and long-term obligations.

01:16:30.000 --> 01:16:43.000
 As I'd mentioned, we have a fund target of 100 to 140 days on the wastewater side and 120 to 180 days of operating expense on the water side.

01:16:43.000 --> 01:16:51.000
 The reason that water is higher is simply more variable, and so we needed a little bit more of a cushion in there to meet our target goals.

01:16:51.000 --> 01:17:02.000
 Productivity, they did note that the efficiency measures that we have in general indicate a little bit less than average productivity.

01:17:02.000 --> 01:17:22.000
 So one of the components on that is the shared services, as has already been mentioned, but one of the key factors in this that we've done, customer service used to be a part of the water department, and we have since moved that out of its own budget.

01:17:22.000 --> 01:17:38.000
 We have actually about 40 full-time equivalents, so you started looking at metrics like the number of employees per million gallon produced and take out that level of full-time equivalents, and we start to pull much more in line with average to above average.

01:17:38.000 --> 01:17:55.000
 We also have two plants, which is pretty unusual for an operation our size, and some fairly significant distances to travel for our transmission assets from Ray Roberts and from Lewisville.

01:17:55.000 --> 01:18:04.000
 So just some things to think about in terms of those metrics, and there's much, much more detail on that in the report itself.

01:18:04.000 --> 01:18:14.000
 On the effective rate, is wastewater still the rates figured at the same way they used to be, where you take those four months during the winter, I believe?

01:18:14.000 --> 01:18:24.000
 Yes, that's absolutely correct, and that's why there's more stability in the fund, because of that approach.

01:18:24.000 --> 01:18:28.000
 I should say stability in income.

01:18:28.000 --> 01:18:40.000
 So I'll go ahead and cover the conclusions. Terry, if he wants to dispute that NUGEN believe that DME is operationally run very well, I'm certainly welcome to do that.

01:18:40.000 --> 01:18:46.000
 They didn't find any red flags requiring immediate attention. They did have a number of recommendations.

01:18:46.000 --> 01:19:02.000
 Water and wastewater, they believe the water and wastewater utilities are operationally sound and didn't find any red flags requiring immediate attention, and basically finding recommendations will help us to improve.

01:19:02.000 --> 01:19:11.000
 And the survey did indicate that substantial progress has been made since the study commenced in 2018.

01:19:11.000 --> 01:19:23.000
 So we've talked about some of the actions that we've taken at staff level as this survey or management study was being completed.

01:19:23.000 --> 01:19:30.000
 There were a number of things that we knew we needed to work on, and we didn't want to wait until the management study was completed to start that.

01:19:30.000 --> 01:19:49.000
 I put a listing here of those items just for your own knowledge, and one of the things that we had thought about doing is perhaps on some of the larger ones actually bring those back as a future work session to kind of explain what we're doing as the plan is finalized and we start working on these elements.

01:19:49.000 --> 01:20:02.000
 A lot of things, as I've said, we've already started on, and I'd be glad to bring a couple of them to you, especially some of our reorganizations, to really show you what we're trying to do by taking those actions.

01:20:02.000 --> 01:20:19.000
 So that is pretty much all we have. It's a very comprehensive study, and I appreciate the board's indulgence on the time that it took not only to complete the study, but to actually go over this material.

01:20:19.000 --> 01:20:25.000
 And so if you have any further questions, I'd be glad to address those.

01:20:25.000 --> 01:20:36.000
 I'll start it out. When you started the presentation, you alluded to the report that you're talking about, and it's 264 pages, I think you said.

01:20:36.000 --> 01:20:37.000
 Yeah, yeah.

01:20:37.000 --> 01:20:41.000
 Is that a report available to us, or is it soon to be available to us?

01:20:41.000 --> 01:20:51.000
 Yes, it's in draft form right now. We need to, what we wanted to do is present this information to Council, and then finalize the report, and then that report will be available.

01:20:51.000 --> 01:20:52.000
 Thank you.

01:20:52.000 --> 01:20:53.000
 That's a lot of information.

01:20:53.000 --> 01:20:55.000
 Yes, it's a very large amount of information.

01:20:55.000 --> 01:21:23.000
 Another question, clarification. Maybe everybody here knows what silos mean. I think I know what it means. I want to clarify that, organizationally.

01:21:23.000 --> 01:21:45.000
 Having spent a career in organizations like that, in the private sector, I recognize the validity of the tension that exists between departments, and some departments, depending on how, depending on the personality of the one running it, can be its own separate kingdom, so to speak.

01:21:45.000 --> 01:21:46.000
 Correct.

01:21:46.000 --> 01:21:53.000
 And if you don't put your hand in that department, unless it gets slapped, if you intrude on that.

01:21:53.000 --> 01:21:54.000
 Right.

01:21:54.000 --> 01:22:07.000
 What I've seen that has helped blur those lines of distinction, and there was reference made to writing procedures and policies.

01:22:07.000 --> 01:22:08.000
 Right.

01:22:08.000 --> 01:22:11.000
 And you're not completed in that effort yet.

01:22:11.000 --> 01:22:12.000
 Correct.

01:22:12.000 --> 01:22:13.000
 You're not done with that.

01:22:13.000 --> 01:22:14.000
 Correct.

01:22:14.000 --> 01:22:42.000
 But to get that done, it has been beneficial, from what I've seen, to periodically have internal audits done by one department, viewing the procedure or policy of another department, and the internal auditors being composed of people from different departments.

01:22:42.000 --> 01:22:47.000
 And there's built-in tension there when that starts.

01:22:47.000 --> 01:22:48.000
 Right.

01:22:48.000 --> 01:23:00.000
 But the result can be good for the organization, because it gives people from one department a little bit better perspective on what the other guys do, what the people do.

01:23:00.000 --> 01:23:01.000
 Right.

01:23:01.000 --> 01:23:12.000
 And when they attach their name to it, and it's published internally, then they take some ownership in that.

01:23:12.000 --> 01:23:16.000
 And that kind of process has helped in the past.

01:23:16.000 --> 01:23:17.000
 Right.

01:23:17.000 --> 01:23:18.000
 So that would be a suggestion I would make on that.

01:23:18.000 --> 01:23:19.000
 I appreciate that.

01:23:19.000 --> 01:23:24.000
 That's a great suggestion.

01:23:24.000 --> 01:23:25.000
 Anyone else?

01:23:25.000 --> 01:23:28.000
 Comments, questions?

01:23:28.000 --> 01:23:29.000
 Well, thank you.

01:23:29.000 --> 01:23:30.000
 Thank you.

01:23:30.000 --> 01:23:35.000
 Mr. Melty, Mr. Banks, and friends.

01:23:35.000 --> 01:23:36.000
 Okay.

01:23:36.000 --> 01:23:43.000
 Well, if there's no more questions, then we'll move on to Work Session Item Number B, Fleet Services.

01:23:43.000 --> 01:23:47.000
 You're back up, buddy.

01:23:47.000 --> 01:23:48.000
 I am.

01:23:48.000 --> 01:23:58.000
 Thank you very much.

01:23:58.000 --> 01:24:13.000
 So again, this presentation is just designed as an informational item to give board members an idea of the process that we go through for equipment replacement and additions, how we go about making those decisions.

01:24:13.000 --> 01:24:26.000
 Just a quick overview of our department, we do have approximately 1,200 city assets that we maintain with an acquired value that actually numbers about $106 million as of last week.

01:24:26.000 --> 01:24:29.000
 So we do cradle to grave asset management.

01:24:29.000 --> 01:24:37.000
 That means that we are involved in the procurement process, the specifications, getting the quotes, purchasing the equipment.

01:24:37.000 --> 01:24:44.000
 We maintain it throughout its lifetime, whether that's preventative maintenance or repairing the equipment.

01:24:44.000 --> 01:24:52.000
 We also do disposal at the end of the assets lifetime.

01:24:52.000 --> 01:24:54.000
 So the procurement is replacements.

01:24:54.000 --> 01:24:55.000
 We do additions.

01:24:55.000 --> 01:24:57.000
 We do leasing of equipment.

01:24:57.000 --> 01:24:59.000
 Sometimes it's long-term leasing.

01:24:59.000 --> 01:25:08.000
 And then we do short-term rentals to fill in for departments when we don't have the appropriate piece of equipment that they might need at that particular time.

01:25:08.000 --> 01:25:11.000
 Our department is fairly small in terms of city departments.

01:25:11.000 --> 01:25:19.000
 We operate with a staff of 26, and that's 19 technicians and office staff, as well as myself.

01:25:19.000 --> 01:25:27.000
 We have two maintenance shops operating now, but the second shop went into operation approximately a year ago, January.

01:25:27.000 --> 01:25:32.000
 And like I said, we do the disposals there via online auction.

01:25:32.000 --> 01:25:39.000
 We just finished an auction on February 5th, and there was a considerable amount of equipment in that auction.

01:25:39.000 --> 01:25:43.000
 That was an approved contract with a new auction provider.

01:25:43.000 --> 01:25:52.000
 I think we netted about $2.3 million from that auction on assets.

01:25:52.000 --> 01:26:03.000
 Our internal budget is about $10.8 million, and that does not include vehicle replacements except for our internal fleet vehicles.

01:26:03.000 --> 01:26:07.000
 What it does include is fuel for the city, which is approximately $3 million.

01:26:07.000 --> 01:26:17.000
 The majority of that, rest of that, is for personal services and for parts, for vehicle parts and equipment.

01:26:17.000 --> 01:26:27.000
 So on a replacement strategy, we use the best practices provided by American Public Works Association, and we are members of that group.

01:26:27.000 --> 01:26:30.000
 I have a professional certification from that group.

01:26:30.000 --> 01:26:37.000
 We also network with a lot of good fleet managers, not only here in the state of Texas, but across the nation.

01:26:37.000 --> 01:26:44.000
 We have quite a network of accomplished fleet managers that we deal with and communicate with.

01:26:44.000 --> 01:26:54.000
 Some of the criteria that we use to replace vehicles, and this is just the short list, and I'll try to get into some of the other factors that we use as well,

01:26:54.000 --> 01:27:03.000
 is age of the equipment, the meter, or that would be miles or hours, and then the maintenance cost or downtime.

01:27:03.000 --> 01:27:12.000
 So we also use operating conditions as a factor when determining how long we think a piece of equipment has a useful life cycle.

01:27:12.000 --> 01:27:19.000
 We have to put that in our system at the very beginning, and that depends on the operating conditions for each department, it varies.

01:27:19.000 --> 01:27:26.000
 We're fortunate in that we can kind of custom tailor replacement cycles for each individual piece of equipment.

01:27:26.000 --> 01:27:33.000
 And because we deal with such a variety of equipment, it's not just sedans and pickups, that would be fairly simple and straightforward.

01:27:33.000 --> 01:27:42.000
 But because we do deal with fire apparatus and we deal with construction equipment and solid waste and refuse equipment and trash compacting,

01:27:42.000 --> 01:27:49.000
 there's mowers, there's bucket trucks, there's about everything that you can think of that goes into our fleet.

01:27:49.000 --> 01:27:58.000
 And so to have each one of those have a separate and individual life cycle based on operating parameters for each department,

01:27:58.000 --> 01:28:03.000
 I think we're fortunate to be able to do that and try to maximize the life cycle of all of our equipment that way.

01:28:03.000 --> 01:28:14.000
 Of these factors here, age is not really important to me. I don't really care how old something is as long as we can still purchase parts to repair it.

01:28:14.000 --> 01:28:23.000
 Meter is also secondary. Depending on the department that's operating a piece of equipment, you can have a piece of equipment worn out in, you know,

01:28:23.000 --> 01:28:31.000
 5,000 hours or you might have another department that runs something for 10,000 hours or 100,000 miles or 150,000 miles.

01:28:31.000 --> 01:28:37.000
 It's just that's all over the place. What does concern me is the maintenance cost and the downtime.

01:28:37.000 --> 01:28:48.000
 Downtime is a factor that most departments will have an issue with when downtime becomes excessive and the equipment is no longer reliable.

01:28:48.000 --> 01:28:54.000
 And so one of the hardest things for fleet to do is determine the actual replacement point of that piece of equipment.

01:28:54.000 --> 01:29:03.000
 We try to do that so that the new piece of equipment is in service before the old asset fails and incurs a lot of downtime and cost.

01:29:03.000 --> 01:29:11.000
 So to me, that's the most important factor. And I'll be honest, we don't hit that mark every time.

01:29:11.000 --> 01:29:16.000
 I wish I could say that every time we get a new piece of equipment, the old one goes out of service.

01:29:16.000 --> 01:29:20.000
 We get the maximum value for it in return, but that's certainly not the case.

01:29:20.000 --> 01:29:26.000
 We have some pieces that fail two weeks before the new piece hits the lot and goes into service.

01:29:26.000 --> 01:29:32.000
 But those things happen. There's a lot of gray areas in the replacement cycle.

01:29:32.000 --> 01:29:37.000
 So how do we determine that? We have help from our fleet maintenance software system.

01:29:37.000 --> 01:29:43.000
 And it uses a 15-point system based on those three criteria I mentioned earlier.

01:29:43.000 --> 01:29:49.000
 And what this system does is it tracks age, it tracks meter, and it tracks maintenance cost for us.

01:29:49.000 --> 01:29:52.000
 It does not track condition, overall condition of the vehicle.

01:29:52.000 --> 01:30:00.000
 That's something we physically have to inspect and look at to determine if that's going to be a factor.

01:30:00.000 --> 01:30:07.000
 But it flags us as a starting point to say this piece of equipment is starting to cost you some money or it's getting old.

01:30:07.000 --> 01:30:11.000
 You might not be able to get parts for it or it's getting a lot of miles.

01:30:11.000 --> 01:30:15.000
 The reliability might not quite be there. So it's time to take a look at it.

01:30:15.000 --> 01:30:21.000
 So it assigns five points to each one of those areas when it's hit that particular life cycle that we set.

01:30:21.000 --> 01:30:25.000
 For instance, on a pickup truck, it's a 10-year life cycle.

01:30:25.000 --> 01:30:29.000
 Once it hits that, it gives the asset five points.

01:30:29.000 --> 01:30:36.000
 We may say it goes 100,000 miles. And then at that point, it assigns five points to that criteria.

01:30:36.000 --> 01:30:39.000
 Maintenance cost is something that calculates internally.

01:30:39.000 --> 01:30:47.000
 And once it reaches 50% of the asset's purchase cost, it assigns five points to that criteria.

01:30:47.000 --> 01:30:54.000
 And the way we know that that's the most important criteria is that when it gets to age or meter, it stops at five.

01:30:54.000 --> 01:30:58.000
 You've reached the max life. You can continue running that piece of equipment.

01:30:58.000 --> 01:31:01.000
 But when it gets to maintenance cost, it continues.

01:31:01.000 --> 01:31:09.000
 So it could go five, six, seven, 10, 15, depending on how long you're willing to push that asset.

01:31:09.000 --> 01:31:16.000
 But when it gets to 15-point total or greater than five points on maintenance,

01:31:16.000 --> 01:31:21.000
 that's the value that I typically look at more importantly than the 15 overall.

01:31:21.000 --> 01:31:24.000
 That flags us to start taking a look at the replacement of that asset.

01:31:24.000 --> 01:31:30.000
 Now, unlike us and our personal vehicles, when we get ready to replace that asset,

01:31:30.000 --> 01:31:35.000
 we go to the dealer and we pick one out and we're good unless you want to order one and wait a couple of months.

01:31:35.000 --> 01:31:43.000
 But typically for most of the fleet equipment, even sedans and trucks have to be ordered.

01:31:43.000 --> 01:31:54.000
 And there is a build time for each one of these assets that can vary from one month to over a year in the case of the bucket trucks, fire apparatus.

01:31:54.000 --> 01:32:02.000
 Refuse trucks we're getting better at because we're starting to preorder those now and reduce that turnaround time on those assets.

01:32:02.000 --> 01:32:07.000
 So basically we take the flagging of the unit.

01:32:07.000 --> 01:32:10.000
 We look at that by department.

01:32:10.000 --> 01:32:16.000
 And that's what we bring to the department meetings when we meet with them to discuss asset replacements.

01:32:16.000 --> 01:32:20.000
 We have our list. They may have their list, which might differ.

01:32:20.000 --> 01:32:26.000
 And then we go over those assets one by one and see, you know, what is their intended use?

01:32:26.000 --> 01:32:29.000
 How long do they really plan on keeping this? Can they keep it another year?

01:32:29.000 --> 01:32:33.000
 Can we push it a year? They don't use it a lot.

01:32:33.000 --> 01:32:38.000
 In the case of the larger bucket trucks, you're right, they don't get used as much.

01:32:38.000 --> 01:32:41.000
 The 40 foot bucket trucks, those get used every day.

01:32:41.000 --> 01:32:47.000
 And so they accumulate a lot of hours on the miles. That's why we're replacing 2015 models.

01:32:47.000 --> 01:32:54.000
 And also I'd like to say that our entire operation is currently being reviewed by an outside consultant.

01:32:54.000 --> 01:33:06.000
 So much like the presentation you just saw, it's likely that you will see the results from our current analysis once that's completed in the next couple of months.

01:33:06.000 --> 01:33:13.000
 And they'll look at everything that we do from management of assets, staffing, buildings, equipment.

01:33:13.000 --> 01:33:18.000
 This may be a premature question, but two things I'm just curious about.

01:33:18.000 --> 01:33:26.000
 How do you treat, like, damage repair from an accident that may or may not affect the life of the vehicle?

01:33:26.000 --> 01:33:31.000
 So in our system, we can flag those as we do it a couple of ways.

01:33:31.000 --> 01:33:35.000
 We flag accidents as accident repair. That's not a normal repair.

01:33:35.000 --> 01:33:42.000
 Anything that's outside of what Fleet would consider normal operating condition repair, we flag it differently.

01:33:42.000 --> 01:33:45.000
 And so we can go back and look at those costs and subtract that from the total.

01:33:45.000 --> 01:33:50.000
 Let's say we had to rebuild a piece of equipment and it cost $40,000 to do that.

01:33:50.000 --> 01:33:54.000
 We certainly don't want to say, oh, you need to replace that now because it's reached that threshold.

01:33:54.000 --> 01:33:57.000
 So we have a way to single that out.

01:33:57.000 --> 01:34:02.000
 The other thing that we do is we actually categorize the equipment abuse as another category.

01:34:02.000 --> 01:34:12.000
 And that's where something was operated on safely, damage happens mostly because it was operator-induced or, you know, those kind of things.

01:34:12.000 --> 01:34:15.000
 So we try to track that separately as well.

01:34:15.000 --> 01:34:18.000
 Do you flag for warranty when the warranties are coming up?

01:34:18.000 --> 01:34:24.000
 It does. So we load the warranties in the system, and when we pull up a work order, it says this unit is still under warranty for these things.

01:34:24.000 --> 01:34:27.000
 Usually I get to it after the week after the warranty is gone.

01:34:27.000 --> 01:34:31.000
 Exactly right. That's when we see the vehicle.

01:34:31.000 --> 01:34:39.000
 It's about a week after. And in some units, we try to get them in right at about the time the warranty is set to expire so we can do a complete inspection.

01:34:39.000 --> 01:34:45.000
 If there's anything we need to get to the vendor or have them come on site and look at before the warranty expires, we try to do that.

01:34:45.000 --> 01:34:47.000
 That's a kind of a hit or miss thing.

01:34:47.000 --> 01:34:49.000
 Great. Thank you.

01:34:49.000 --> 01:34:52.000
 So one of the factors, too, I wanted to bring this up.

01:34:52.000 --> 01:34:57.000
 We are subject to the Clean Fleet Ordinance, and this is ongoing.

01:34:57.000 --> 01:35:07.000
 The last one we signed was in 2015, and basically it kind of governs some of the activities that pertain to fleet maintenance and operation and asset replacement.

01:35:07.000 --> 01:35:18.000
 In particular, it encourages us to pursue the lowest emission vehicles available on the market at that time, and they also emphasize alternative fuels and technologies.

01:35:18.000 --> 01:35:31.000
 And of course, we like to look at all that stuff, although there are costs associated with that. So we're not required to purchase something that costs twice as much because it's fuel efficient and emissions friendly.

01:35:31.000 --> 01:35:36.000
 But we certainly need to look at that before we purchase.

01:35:36.000 --> 01:35:37.000
 Can I ask you a question?

01:35:37.000 --> 01:35:39.000
 Yes, sir.

01:35:39.000 --> 01:35:42.000
 I figured you would.

01:35:42.000 --> 01:35:56.000
 I was just curious, what percentage or how many vehicles in the fleet are either hybrid or all electric?

01:35:56.000 --> 01:35:57.000
 All electric.

01:35:57.000 --> 01:35:59.000
 Currently, it's a pretty low percentage.

01:35:59.000 --> 01:36:03.000
 We have four all-electric sedans in the fleet right now.

01:36:03.000 --> 01:36:05.000
 We do have several hybrid electric fleets.

01:36:05.000 --> 01:36:09.000
 Those are the Toyota Prius and the Ford Escapes.

01:36:09.000 --> 01:36:16.000
 We have a couple of pieces of large equipment in DME that are hybrids as well, a couple of bucket trucks.

01:36:16.000 --> 01:36:18.000
 But relatively low percentage.

01:36:18.000 --> 01:36:25.000
 We did have at one time some hybrid refuse trucks in the fleet.

01:36:25.000 --> 01:36:38.000
 And one thing that we found, you have to be really careful if you're getting on the very advanced edge of that technology, is that it can come back to bite you in terms of maintenance costs and downtime because some of this technology is not fully vetted.

01:36:38.000 --> 01:36:44.000
 It's available and it's out there, but I certainly don't want to be, with our small size, the one to test it out.

01:36:44.000 --> 01:36:51.000
 I'd rather the Fort Orris than the Los Angeles' of the world do that testing for us.

01:36:51.000 --> 01:37:03.000
 So when we do find technology that works, in the case of the electric vehicle, the Bolt and the Leaf, those are, so far, excellent vehicles.

01:37:03.000 --> 01:37:07.000
 And we're on board with purchasing as many of those as we can.

01:37:07.000 --> 01:37:16.000
 Would it be possible to get a copy of the latest version of the Clean Fleet Ordinance?

01:37:16.000 --> 01:37:17.000
 Yes, sir.

01:37:17.000 --> 01:37:19.000
 That is certainly available.

01:37:19.000 --> 01:37:28.000
 The other thing that the Ordinance does is it encourages us to maintain these vehicles so that they do stay in emission compliance, which we have to do by state law anyway.

01:37:28.000 --> 01:37:34.000
 But I'm pretty confident that we have a really good preventative maintenance program in place.

01:37:34.000 --> 01:37:43.000
 In fact, we have a lot of repeat customers for our auctions because of that, and they're confident that we repair the vehicles in a timely manner and keep them up to date.

01:37:43.000 --> 01:37:48.000
 And we've heard those comments many times from some of the return buyers from our auctions.

01:37:48.000 --> 01:37:53.000
 I have one other thing, and if it's not germane to the subject, tell me.

01:37:53.000 --> 01:38:01.000
 I know the city has an ordinance against idling.

01:38:01.000 --> 01:38:05.000
 Is this followed by the fleet?

01:38:05.000 --> 01:38:13.000
 Because, quite frankly, I've seen a lot of trucks, city trucks, somebody's out checking a meter and the engine's running.

01:38:13.000 --> 01:38:14.000
 Right.

01:38:14.000 --> 01:38:19.000
 And I don't know if that's because of keeping the computer running in the truck or whatever.

01:38:19.000 --> 01:38:25.000
 Well, there is a policy in place for idle reduction.

01:38:25.000 --> 01:38:28.000
 That's citywide for fleet, for city vehicles.

01:38:28.000 --> 01:38:33.000
 I know there's another ordinance outside of that for community vehicles.

01:38:33.000 --> 01:38:40.000
 There is not a department that's responsible for policing that policy, per se.

01:38:40.000 --> 01:38:51.000
 It's more of an educational type policy where we try to educate our customers on the proper use of the vehicle, and that includes reducing idle time.

01:38:51.000 --> 01:38:56.000
 Now, fleet is able to track idle time on the majority of our vehicles.

01:38:56.000 --> 01:39:05.000
 So we collect that data and then we bring that back to those departments and give them opportunities for improvement when they see poor performance and a lot of idling.

01:39:05.000 --> 01:39:19.000
 The other part about that policy is there are exclusions for weather, for environmental conditions, for the operators, and for emergency vehicles typically are exempt from that policy.

01:39:19.000 --> 01:39:22.000
 So it's not unusual to see a police or a fire truck idling.

01:39:22.000 --> 01:39:32.000
 And also if it needs to idle in order to do its work.

01:39:32.000 --> 01:39:42.000
 So I just wanted to give an example, and this is a fairly easy one to follow, on how the point system works and how it assigns criteria and value to this.

01:39:42.000 --> 01:39:50.000
 We have a 2013 police patrol Tahoe, and these were right out of our fleet system, so these are actual units.

01:39:50.000 --> 01:39:56.000
 But there are 84 month life expectancy each, one's a 2013, one's a 2011 model.

01:39:56.000 --> 01:40:04.000
 So one has 3.8 points for age, one has more than, well it's five, it stops at five for age because it's been in the fleet 102 months.

01:40:04.000 --> 01:40:10.000
 Like I said, we don't take that too much to heart.

01:40:10.000 --> 01:40:14.000
 It's a consideration if it becomes a problem with downtime.

01:40:14.000 --> 01:40:20.000
 So for meter, one has 69,000 miles, that's at about 2.7 points.

01:40:20.000 --> 01:40:31.000
 We've set 130,000 mile criteria for this particular group of vehicles that we run in the patrols because we moved from the Crown Vic platform to the Tahoe, which is a much more reliable vehicle.

01:40:31.000 --> 01:40:38.000
 It's on a truck chassis, we're pretty sure we used to have a five year life, we moved that up to seven.

01:40:38.000 --> 01:40:46.000
 And we used to have 100,000 mile life, which many of them didn't make, and we moved that to 130 with the Tahoe's.

01:40:46.000 --> 01:40:53.000
 So this 2013 has 3.8 points for maintenance, it's got $20,000 lifetime to date maintenance cost.

01:40:53.000 --> 01:40:59.000
 Capitalized cost was 54, that's for the chassis and all the equipment that goes in it.

01:40:59.000 --> 01:41:06.000
 So at 10 points, this unit's not flagged for replacement, it doesn't show up on fleet's radar screen for a couple more years yet.

01:41:06.000 --> 01:41:13.000
 Take the 2011, it's at over 15 points because we have 6.9 in maintenance points on it.

01:41:13.000 --> 01:41:19.000
 And that's a unit that's flagged for us to look at, and what we'll do is we pull that one and we put it in a list.

01:41:19.000 --> 01:41:26.000
 We'll actually look at the condition of the vehicle and then we'll talk to the operating department and say what are your intentions with this vehicle?

01:41:26.000 --> 01:41:39.000
 You continue to operate it eight hours a day, is it a reduced operation, can it be pushed another year without affecting the way that your department operates, or do we in fact need to go ahead and replace this unit?

01:41:39.000 --> 01:41:42.000
 That maintenance include tires, brakes, all those things?

01:41:42.000 --> 01:41:44.000
 It does, yes sir it does.

01:41:44.000 --> 01:41:46.000
 And your maintenance cost is cumulative, right?

01:41:46.000 --> 01:41:48.000
 Yes sir, so it's lifetime to date.

01:41:48.000 --> 01:41:55.000
 And is the life expectancy always the depreciable life for the equipment?

01:41:55.000 --> 01:41:59.000
 No, actually it can be much more than that.

01:41:59.000 --> 01:42:09.000
 So we may depreciate an asset over five years financially wise, but in our system it may be a ten year life cycle because we know that typically that's what that department can get out of its vehicle.

01:42:09.000 --> 01:42:16.000
 We basically fleet sets that.

01:42:16.000 --> 01:42:26.000
 So here's a list of published replacement criteria that we use just to kind of give you an example of the variety of equipment that we have and some of the assumed life cycles.

01:42:26.000 --> 01:42:32.000
 We look at this annually and compare it against our fleet and how are we doing?

01:42:32.000 --> 01:42:38.000
 Are we setting the right life cycles and the meter for these units or have we missed the mark on some things?

01:42:38.000 --> 01:42:44.000
 And if we do we adjust this replacement criteria, but this is published to our operating departments.

01:42:44.000 --> 01:43:00.000
 And when we meet with operating departments annually before the budget's done that we go over this list of criteria and their list of vehicles that are on our list and their list of vehicles that aren't not on our list and we come to a consensus as to what actually needs to be replaced now.

01:43:00.000 --> 01:43:02.000
 What can be moved out?

01:43:02.000 --> 01:43:05.000
 Maybe some things need to be replaced early.

01:43:05.000 --> 01:43:07.000
 Backhoe is pretty quick in five years.

01:43:07.000 --> 01:43:08.000
 Pardon?

01:43:08.000 --> 01:43:11.000
 I said that backhoe assumed life cycle in five years seems a little quick.

01:43:11.000 --> 01:43:16.000
 And we typically get a lot more than that. We're getting rid of backhoes now there are 2010 models.

01:43:16.000 --> 01:43:19.000
 They're coming up for replacement.

01:43:19.000 --> 01:43:25.000
 There are some departments that can put 75 hours on a backhoe in five years and there are other ones that take much longer than that.

01:43:25.000 --> 01:43:41.000
 So like I say the years in the meter isn't as critical as if we're putting $80,000 in maintenance in that unit then we can buy a new one for $115. We certainly don't want to keep maintaining that.

01:43:41.000 --> 01:43:51.000
 Do you keep any records, any data, any history on the consequences of equipment being down? The adverse consequences?

01:43:51.000 --> 01:44:05.000
 So our fleet system will track downtime and that's a critical factor when we go to look at replacement because many departments don't have the depth of equipment that will allow certain pieces of equipment to be down for very long.

01:44:05.000 --> 01:44:23.000
 So while we have data on downtime that's basically hours and we have maintenance costs, what we don't have is what does that cost that department each hour that that piece of equipment is down because that's going to vary from the class of equipment to the department.

01:44:23.000 --> 01:44:40.000
 And that's one key piece of information that now they'll relate that information to us but it's not tracked in our system. So I don't know that if an electric bucket truck is down it's costing DME $150 an hour or whatever that number might be. That's a piece that I don't have.

01:44:40.000 --> 01:44:51.000
 Do you have any records on the terms of accidents, lost time injuries or consequences like that due to an equipment failure?

01:44:51.000 --> 01:45:09.000
 So our risk management department is tracking that data and as far as equipment failures go I'm not aware of anything recently that's caused issues but the risk department does track accidents, the rate of accidents, they're looking at safety.

01:45:09.000 --> 01:45:25.000
 They're looking at things Fleet can do to make sure that the vehicles are safer and that may be some add-on things. For instance, we're putting backup cameras on everything now, whether it's an older backhoe or an older skid steer that didn't have one from the factory.

01:45:25.000 --> 01:45:32.000
 Everything we order now has a backup camera on it and that's basically a risk recommendation.

01:45:32.000 --> 01:45:35.000
 Good question.

01:45:35.000 --> 01:45:42.000
 One thing I do want to elaborate on is that we collaborate with all the operating departments.

01:45:42.000 --> 01:45:58.000
 We don't sit here at Fleet and say dictate you're going to replace this piece of equipment at this time and you're going to replace it with this because we know that operating parameters change, departments change, they change personnel, they change operating conditions and requirements.

01:45:58.000 --> 01:46:11.000
 They have new technology that they need to use and so we sit down with each department and we develop a base specification from the Fleet side, from what we feel that this equipment needs for you to operate properly.

01:46:11.000 --> 01:46:24.000
 Now they may tell us that they're going to do something else with this piece of equipment and they might need this, they might need a four wheel drive, they might need an extended backhoe, they might need to do different things than the standard spec would give them.

01:46:24.000 --> 01:46:35.000
 And so once that's been justified through them, then we add that to our specification and that could be, a lot of that has to do with how they're going to utilize it, the technology that they need on it and those types of things.

01:46:35.000 --> 01:46:39.000
 And of course safety is always a big one, like I mentioned, the backup cameras.

01:46:39.000 --> 01:46:52.000
 Any new piece of equipment that has an enhanced safety feature, if it's optional, we'll try to get that into that piece of equipment if it's not cost prohibitive.

01:46:52.000 --> 01:46:56.000
 We also have a committee that looks at the green side of the Fleet.

01:46:56.000 --> 01:47:06.000
 So we look at, you know, are there alternative applications, for instance, instead of replacing a small sedan, can we use an electric vehicle, all electric vehicle.

01:47:06.000 --> 01:47:14.000
 You know, if they run less than 200 miles a day, certainly that's, and it has enough space inside to do what they need, then they can certainly do that.

01:47:14.000 --> 01:47:25.000
 And we recently acquired a Chevy Bolt in the Fleet rental program, and so the other departments can use it.

01:47:25.000 --> 01:47:28.000
 Once you get behind the seat, it's more of a selling point.

01:47:28.000 --> 01:47:41.000
 So we're trying to get that vehicle out into the hands of other operating departments so they can see, hey, this is, this actually is a vehicle that we might be able to utilize and the electric department is one that's been on board with that.

01:47:41.000 --> 01:47:44.000
 The other thing we want to look at is life cycle costs.

01:47:44.000 --> 01:47:53.000
 It may be, it may cost you, I'll give you an example, as an electric mower that we're going to be purchasing or going to try to get approval to purchase.

01:47:53.000 --> 01:47:55.000
 So it's an all electric mower.

01:47:55.000 --> 01:48:09.000
 It is, it does have more upfront costs, but when you weigh out the anticipated maintenance costs and the return on the investment at the life, at the end of the life, and you compare it with our standard diesel or gasoline powered mowers, the life cycle costs are way lower on it.

01:48:09.000 --> 01:48:14.000
 So yeah, you're going to spend a little more upfront, but you're not going to be doing the maintenance on it.

01:48:14.000 --> 01:48:24.000
 And so that's something that you'll be seeing pretty soon where we look at, you know, not just the beginning cost of the thing, but what does it cost you throughout its life.

01:48:24.000 --> 01:48:33.000
 And then we come up with the final spec, you know, when the department and the fleet is in agreement, and then we go out to quote for that.

01:48:33.000 --> 01:48:35.000
 So there are different ways that we purchase.

01:48:35.000 --> 01:48:37.000
 Most of the things that we purchase are on a contract.

01:48:37.000 --> 01:48:49.000
 We try to standardize in the case of all tech and in the case of Peterbilt to certain models that they provide that we know is a good fit for our fleet and for our operating departments.

01:48:49.000 --> 01:48:56.000
 And, and then the other way is to get quotes or bids if it's something that certainly we don't have a contract in place for yet.

01:48:56.000 --> 01:49:00.000
 We're working on more contracts for heavy equipment.

01:49:00.000 --> 01:49:09.000
 But there are there are so many odd things in the fleet trailers and mowers and just there's a lot of different stuff.

01:49:09.000 --> 01:49:11.000
 You can't have a contract on everything.

01:49:11.000 --> 01:49:13.000
 All I wish we did.

01:49:13.000 --> 01:49:16.000
 And then the other thing is fleet additions.

01:49:16.000 --> 01:49:21.000
 And when fleet presents the budget here in a few months, we'll do the fleet replacements.

01:49:21.000 --> 01:49:22.000
 We'll bring that to you.

01:49:22.000 --> 01:49:30.000
 But fleet additions have to be vetted through the departments and they'll bring that that to you in their in their own budgets.

01:49:30.000 --> 01:49:35.000
 And then they collaborate with us on exactly what those additions should be.

01:49:35.000 --> 01:49:45.000
 If they're approved, we are doing some short term rentals for equipment that we don't have in the fleet or that we don't have enough of in the fleet.

01:49:45.000 --> 01:49:50.000
 We're also looking at putting more of that type of equipment in the motor pool.

01:49:50.000 --> 01:49:53.000
 So it can be used instead of going outside running.

01:49:53.000 --> 01:49:57.000
 They can come to the motor pool, pick it up, go use it for a day, bring it back.

01:49:57.000 --> 01:50:01.000
 And it's just taken some time to get certain pieces of construction equipment in there.

01:50:01.000 --> 01:50:06.000
 Right now we have a skid steer that is out a lot because the department has a skid steer down.

01:50:06.000 --> 01:50:07.000
 They drop it off.

01:50:07.000 --> 01:50:08.000
 We repair it.

01:50:08.000 --> 01:50:12.000
 Meanwhile, they're still they're still working using our equipment.

01:50:12.000 --> 01:50:20.000
 We've done some leasing municipal leases on that because at the end of the year we turn it back in and we get a brand new piece of equipment.

01:50:20.000 --> 01:50:22.000
 So your maintenance costs are really low.

01:50:22.000 --> 01:50:27.000
 You're going to pay for wear and tear items, which are going to do if you own the piece of equipment anyway.

01:50:27.000 --> 01:50:30.000
 It's under full warranty the whole time you own it.

01:50:30.000 --> 01:50:33.000
 So the idea is that downtime is less.

01:50:33.000 --> 01:50:39.000
 And certainly the cost of the municipal lease, at least through Bobcat, is very attractive.

01:50:39.000 --> 01:50:45.000
 We've done that on about three so far and it's worked out pretty well for us.

01:50:45.000 --> 01:50:53.000
 And just to give you an idea, some typical acquisition costs, because I know I go into sticker shock every time we go out and get quotes on equipment.

01:50:53.000 --> 01:50:57.000
 And it will typically increase from one to three percent per year.

01:50:57.000 --> 01:51:03.000
 But depending on what you're buying, I realize that construction equipment is just a big chunk of steel.

01:51:03.000 --> 01:51:08.000
 So steel prices play a lot into how much this equipment costs as well as technology.

01:51:08.000 --> 01:51:15.000
 Anytime there's a change over a year where you have to meet certain emission standards, that increases the price considerably.

01:51:15.000 --> 01:51:20.000
 But you get a much cleaner vehicle, not necessarily more reliable but cleaner.

01:51:20.000 --> 01:51:23.000
 And so this really concludes the presentation.

01:51:23.000 --> 01:51:25.000
 I'll be happy to try to answer any questions.

01:51:25.000 --> 01:51:30.000
 I'll leave this up so you can continue to go into shock.

01:51:30.000 --> 01:51:38.000
 Could we get the list of your point system that you assigned for different thresholds when they're met?

01:51:38.000 --> 01:51:41.000
 Yes. The slide that I had, yes.

01:51:41.000 --> 01:51:48.000
 Not just that slide, but the process you use to assign points to a piece of equipment for various parameters.

01:51:48.000 --> 01:51:50.000
 Sure.

01:51:50.000 --> 01:51:58.000
 And do you ever have a dialogue with the department that comes to you in the budgeting process and says we want to replace this?

01:51:58.000 --> 01:52:03.000
 Does the conversation ever happen where you say why don't you use it another year?

01:52:03.000 --> 01:52:04.000
 Certainly.

01:52:04.000 --> 01:52:17.000
 Or does that, does the conversation come to this group first and say we've got to approve this when you think in your mind that it can go another year easily with little risk to anyone?

01:52:17.000 --> 01:52:22.000
 Yeah. That's a conversation I do have with each department if we disagree on something like that.

01:52:22.000 --> 01:52:27.000
 They'll have to justify why they believe that it's imperative that that gets replaced now.

01:52:27.000 --> 01:52:30.000
 And most of the time it's not much of an argument.

01:52:30.000 --> 01:52:37.000
 We agree pretty readily on, yeah, this thing can be pushed out based on how we think we're going to operate it.

01:52:37.000 --> 01:52:44.000
 And I'll tell you the general fund departments, there's never any question with fleet recommendations.

01:52:44.000 --> 01:52:48.000
 They understand that they need to use their equipment as long as they possibly can.

01:52:48.000 --> 01:52:57.000
 It's funded from the general fund and there are some operating departments where we're looking at, you know, replacement cycles on them.

01:52:57.000 --> 01:53:02.000
 What can we do as fleet and what can you do as the customer to work together to extend those?

01:53:02.000 --> 01:53:09.000
 Because I realize the cost of this equipment is becoming pretty high over a short period of time.

01:53:09.000 --> 01:53:19.000
 So we're looking at programs where we actually help. We have quarterly customer service meetings, by the way, outside of these replacement meetings.

01:53:19.000 --> 01:53:23.000
 And that's just a dialogue between fleet and that particular customer.

01:53:23.000 --> 01:53:28.000
 We do it with all of our large customers and that's to say, you know, here are some things that are going on.

01:53:28.000 --> 01:53:34.000
 Here's what we see. Here's some things you can do to help us help you maintain your equipment and make it live longer.

01:53:34.000 --> 01:53:40.000
 You know, what are your issues with fleet? Is there anything that we can do better that we're not doing?

01:53:40.000 --> 01:53:53.000
 So to that end, we also have some agreements in place and we're working on more of those with departments so that they know what we know what their expectations are and they know what we can deliver.

01:53:53.000 --> 01:53:57.000
 And we're working with some customer service agreements basically is what those are.

01:53:57.000 --> 01:54:07.000
 So to summarize, what I think you just said was those conversations happen before an individual department comes to this group and wants approval for replacements. Is that right?

01:54:07.000 --> 01:54:18.000
 For replacements, yes. Now if it's a fleet addition, that's a conversation that fleet doesn't typically get involved in in the beginning of that.

01:54:18.000 --> 01:54:37.000
 Yes, sir. I assume that the biodiesel fuel program is that you folks were, was being used in the city 13, 14 years ago is no longer part of fleet services using biodiesel fuel for their various vehicles?

01:54:37.000 --> 01:54:44.000
 No, biodiesel in the city is alive and well. We just don't manufacture it on site and purchase from that particular supplier.

01:54:44.000 --> 01:55:03.000
 So our fuel supplier, which is Martin Eagle Oil, they supply B20 biodiesel to us. I think the B10 is the minimum diesel that we buy, unless it's for like a auxiliary generator or something like that where the fuel has to sit a long time before it gets used up.

01:55:03.000 --> 01:55:11.000
 So nearly 100% of our diesel equipment runs on biodiesel. Great, thanks.

01:55:11.000 --> 01:55:26.000
 Is there a threshold for the cumulative maintenance cost that you're looking at not crossing? In other words, you want to keep the cumulative maintenance cost below a certain percentage of a replacement cost or whatever it is?

01:55:26.000 --> 01:55:41.000
 Well, it flags it at 50% and we certainly don't want to see it go above about 60 to 70%. And there again, it depends on how much that piece of equipment is being operated and how much they rely on it and how much downtime they can stand.

01:55:41.000 --> 01:55:59.000
 So from my standpoint as a fleet manager, I would like to see it out of the fleet because at some point it's going to break and then it's going to cost you two ways. You're either going to have to fix it until your new piece gets here or you're going to lose money at auction.

01:55:59.000 --> 01:56:04.000
 You're going to lose the money on the backside.

01:56:04.000 --> 01:56:06.000
 Very impressive program, Mr. Kader.

01:56:06.000 --> 01:56:08.000
 Thank you.

01:56:08.000 --> 01:56:10.000
 Thank you.

01:56:10.000 --> 01:56:12.000
 Any questions on that?

01:56:12.000 --> 01:56:24.000
 Not on this, but I had a question that, with this new format, I completely missed the opportunity for a new citizen as your future agenda. So is it too late to ask a question?

01:56:24.000 --> 01:56:26.000
 I don't think so.

01:56:26.000 --> 01:56:28.000
 Go ahead.

01:56:28.000 --> 01:56:29.000
 It's on there.

01:56:29.000 --> 01:56:53.000
 From what I could find out that green purchasing has come up in a number of ways in our meeting today with the recycling company, electronic recycling and presentation we just had about biodiesel and building a greener fleet.

01:56:53.000 --> 01:57:18.000
 From what I could find, the city in 2007 passed an ordinance, an environmentally preferable purchasing policy, and I wondered if this ordinance had been looked at for updating since so much has happened in the intervening 13 years,

01:57:18.000 --> 01:57:27.000
 and I would be curious and like to know if there has been a revision of this policy.

01:57:27.000 --> 01:57:30.000
 Thank you.

01:57:30.000 --> 01:57:33.000
 Thank you, Mr. Sof.

01:57:33.000 --> 01:57:36.000
 Do we have a need for a closed session today?

01:57:36.000 --> 01:57:38.000
 I think so.

01:57:38.000 --> 01:57:41.000
 Well, if not, does anybody have any further comments?

01:57:41.000 --> 01:57:51.000
 [BLANK_AUDIO]

