1
00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:10,250
Good evening. It is Thursday April 27th, 2026. This is a

2
00:00:10,250 --> 00:00:12,560
Board of Ethics panel discussion.

3
00:00:12,560 --> 00:00:16,210
I have determined that we have a quorum of the panel

4
00:00:16,210 --> 00:00:19,239
present. We have the full panel here actually.

5
00:00:19,239 --> 00:00:27,079
And we are convened to discuss the Board of Ethics BOE 26-0

6
00:00:27,079 --> 00:00:35,600
17 ethics complaint, number 26-003, filed on August 12, 2026

7
00:00:35,600 --> 00:00:41,119
, concerning alleged violations of the ordinance section 2-

8
00:00:41,119 --> 00:00:43,240
273.

9
00:00:43,240 --> 00:00:53,539
So we will begin by looking at the agenda information sheet

10
00:00:53,539 --> 00:00:54,240
.

11
00:00:54,240 --> 00:01:02,020
So tonight our task will be to determine if the complaint

12
00:01:02,020 --> 00:01:08,239
is baseless, is actionable or baseless.

13
00:01:08,239 --> 00:01:14,670
And if we can go on to the received complaint, which is 24

14
00:01:14,670 --> 00:01:16,239
pages long.

15
00:01:16,239 --> 00:01:21,450
I spent a couple of hours going over this line by line, and

16
00:01:21,450 --> 00:01:24,859
I do want to make sure with both of the panelists that they

17
00:01:24,859 --> 00:01:27,239
did spend some time going over it.

18
00:01:27,239 --> 00:01:28,239
I read the documents.

19
00:01:28,239 --> 00:01:38,430
Andrea did too. So we are doing our best to be diligent. So

20
00:01:38,430 --> 00:01:41,239
exhibit three is the ordinance.

21
00:01:41,239 --> 00:01:47,239
I guess we'll come back to that in a minute.

22
00:01:47,239 --> 00:01:56,519
So basically the complaint is that this was brought by a

23
00:01:56,519 --> 00:02:03,730
complainant and he is alleging that the city attorney

24
00:02:03,730 --> 00:02:08,240
violated section 2-273 of the ordinance.

25
00:02:08,240 --> 00:02:13,289
And I guess if you'll pull that up, I think it would be

26
00:02:13,289 --> 00:02:18,240
best to go item by item and just make sure of that.

27
00:02:18,240 --> 00:02:24,240
So improper influence is the allegation.

28
00:02:24,240 --> 00:02:31,930
And so item C, one would be secure special privileges or

29
00:02:31,930 --> 00:02:37,240
benefits for such person or others.

30
00:02:37,240 --> 00:02:45,240
I could not find any evidence of that in the complaint.

31
00:02:45,240 --> 00:02:48,240
Did either of you?

32
00:02:48,240 --> 00:02:53,060
That was unfair to me. There was an account of my special

33
00:02:53,060 --> 00:02:55,240
privilege or benefit.

34
00:02:55,240 --> 00:02:58,870
Did you see it written in the report, what the benefit

35
00:02:58,870 --> 00:03:00,240
would have been?

36
00:03:00,240 --> 00:03:03,569
That was my concern is I could not see what the special

37
00:03:03,569 --> 00:03:07,240
privilege or benefit would have been that was gained.

38
00:03:07,240 --> 00:03:12,240
The document was difficult to follow.

39
00:03:12,240 --> 00:03:16,840
I did find the response from the deputy city attorney

40
00:03:16,840 --> 00:03:21,870
pretty clear that it laid out what was expected and I could

41
00:03:21,870 --> 00:03:24,240
follow it very easily.

42
00:03:24,240 --> 00:03:29,000
But in the complaint, comments were made that weren't even

43
00:03:29,000 --> 00:03:32,240
related and there was no justification.

44
00:03:32,240 --> 00:03:37,240
So it was difficult to follow the logic.

45
00:03:37,240 --> 00:03:40,240
So I did not see any evidence of that.

46
00:03:40,240 --> 00:03:44,590
I guess we'll go down each one of these and I guess we'll

47
00:03:44,590 --> 00:03:47,240
go on each item to make sure that.

48
00:03:47,240 --> 00:03:49,240
Does that sound like it could?

49
00:03:49,240 --> 00:03:51,240
You would like to take a motion on each?

50
00:03:51,240 --> 00:03:52,240
Okay, so you can.

51
00:03:52,240 --> 00:03:55,930
So do you want to, does someone want to make a motion about

52
00:03:55,930 --> 00:04:01,270
the item one secure special privileges or benefits for such

53
00:04:01,270 --> 00:04:03,240
person or others?

54
00:04:03,240 --> 00:04:10,240
Did either of you see any evidence that the city attorney

55
00:04:10,240 --> 00:04:19,240
secured any privileges as a result of the response?

56
00:04:19,240 --> 00:04:22,860
I would like to make a motion that we could not find any

57
00:04:22,860 --> 00:04:27,220
privileges, special privileges or benefits in the paperwork

58
00:04:27,220 --> 00:04:28,240
provided.

59
00:04:28,240 --> 00:04:31,240
Okay, so I'm going to be the second.

60
00:04:31,240 --> 00:04:32,240
I'll second.

61
00:04:32,240 --> 00:04:33,240
Okay.

62
00:04:33,240 --> 00:04:36,240
That's good since there's two of you.

63
00:04:36,240 --> 00:04:41,410
Is there any more discussion we need to have on this first

64
00:04:41,410 --> 00:04:42,240
item?

65
00:04:42,240 --> 00:04:44,240
Okay.

66
00:04:44,240 --> 00:04:46,240
So are you ready to vote?

67
00:04:46,240 --> 00:04:51,730
All in favor of the motion that there were no, there was no

68
00:04:51,730 --> 00:04:55,240
evidence of special privileges.

69
00:04:55,240 --> 00:04:57,240
Where's your hand?

70
00:04:57,240 --> 00:04:58,240
I'm fine.

71
00:04:58,240 --> 00:05:04,240
So it's unanimous.

72
00:05:04,240 --> 00:05:11,240
So we're going to move on to two.

73
00:05:11,240 --> 00:05:14,629
So put any special consideration, treatment or advantage to

74
00:05:14,629 --> 00:05:19,250
any citizen, individual, business organization or group

75
00:05:19,250 --> 00:05:22,589
beyond that which is normally available to every other

76
00:05:22,589 --> 00:05:27,240
citizen, individual, business organization or group.

77
00:05:27,240 --> 00:05:38,240
Did you see any evidence of that?

78
00:05:38,240 --> 00:05:44,240
Well, let's see.

79
00:05:44,240 --> 00:05:49,360
If that information was missing, did that benefit the

80
00:05:49,360 --> 00:05:53,240
police department or police officer?

81
00:05:53,240 --> 00:05:57,529
Well, the complaint is, I mean the allegation is against

82
00:05:57,529 --> 00:05:59,240
the legal department.

83
00:05:59,240 --> 00:06:00,240
The city attorney.

84
00:06:00,240 --> 00:06:01,240
The city attorney.

85
00:06:01,240 --> 00:06:02,240
Oh, okay.

86
00:06:02,240 --> 00:06:08,649
The main city attorney, so there was never a mention of the

87
00:06:08,649 --> 00:06:11,240
police department.

88
00:06:11,240 --> 00:06:13,240
Can I ask a clarifying question?

89
00:06:13,240 --> 00:06:14,240
Yes.

90
00:06:14,240 --> 00:06:19,610
The city attorney is, represents the city of Denton as well

91
00:06:19,610 --> 00:06:25,209
, and since the department, the police department is part of

92
00:06:25,209 --> 00:06:30,389
the city of Denton, it would fall under the preview of the

93
00:06:30,389 --> 00:06:33,240
city attorney, correct?

94
00:06:33,240 --> 00:06:37,620
According to the city charter, the city attorney is charged

95
00:06:37,620 --> 00:06:39,240
with representing.

96
00:06:39,240 --> 00:06:43,240
So he is the legal representation for the police department

97
00:06:43,240 --> 00:06:44,240
, correct?

98
00:06:44,240 --> 00:06:45,240
For the whole city.

99
00:06:45,240 --> 00:06:46,240
For the whole city.

100
00:06:46,240 --> 00:06:51,069
And that is where, because this is where we advantage to

101
00:06:51,069 --> 00:06:53,240
any citizen, right?

102
00:06:53,240 --> 00:06:57,029
Like, I was looking at this not normally available to every

103
00:06:57,029 --> 00:06:58,240
other citizen.

104
00:06:58,240 --> 00:07:02,129
Well, he wouldn't be available to me because I'm not an

105
00:07:02,129 --> 00:07:06,019
entity of the city of Denton, I'm not an employee of the

106
00:07:06,019 --> 00:07:10,079
city of Denton, so I don't think that that really applies

107
00:07:10,079 --> 00:07:14,240
in this case, because that is what his job is.

108
00:07:14,240 --> 00:07:16,240
He was doing his job.

109
00:07:16,240 --> 00:07:19,759
And that's where I would like, because that was the only

110
00:07:19,759 --> 00:07:23,579
point where I was kind of like, okay, if some, yes, I would

111
00:07:23,579 --> 00:07:27,240
not get the representation of the city attorney, but that

112
00:07:27,240 --> 00:07:30,240
is because I'm not an employee of the city.

113
00:07:30,240 --> 00:07:31,240
So.

114
00:07:31,240 --> 00:07:33,240
Right.

115
00:07:33,240 --> 00:07:35,240
So I would like to make a motion that.

116
00:07:35,240 --> 00:07:36,240
Right.

117
00:07:36,240 --> 00:07:41,350
Let me just mention, I did copy this because his complaint

118
00:07:41,350 --> 00:07:46,240
really didn't come out and say something very clear.

119
00:07:46,240 --> 00:07:51,370
But what I assume is that he's complaining that this report

120
00:07:51,370 --> 00:07:54,240
should have been released to him.

121
00:07:54,240 --> 00:07:57,930
And the law for this kind of report, you cannot go to the

122
00:07:57,930 --> 00:08:01,850
city with the Public Information Act request and ask for,

123
00:08:01,850 --> 00:08:05,720
you're required to go to the Department of Family and Prot

124
00:08:05,720 --> 00:08:07,240
ective Services.

125
00:08:07,240 --> 00:08:08,240
So.

126
00:08:08,240 --> 00:08:13,000
And I will say, as a therapist who has made these reports

127
00:08:13,000 --> 00:08:17,860
before, you get a number after sitting on the phone or the

128
00:08:17,860 --> 00:08:23,139
computer for sometimes hours, and that's the only knowledge

129
00:08:23,139 --> 00:08:26,240
you ever have of what happened.

130
00:08:26,240 --> 00:08:28,240
You can't even ask what happened.

131
00:08:28,240 --> 00:08:29,240
Right.

132
00:08:29,240 --> 00:08:35,960
So in your motion, I think there's no evidence that the

133
00:08:35,960 --> 00:08:38,240
city attorney was.

134
00:08:38,240 --> 00:08:44,039
Able was required by law to release the, what did he call

135
00:08:44,039 --> 00:08:46,240
it, the report.

136
00:08:46,240 --> 00:08:49,240
The complaint.

137
00:08:49,240 --> 00:08:53,240
The mandatory cross report to the EFPS.

138
00:08:53,240 --> 00:08:58,519
There's no evidence that the city attorney is required by

139
00:08:58,519 --> 00:09:03,360
law to release the mandatory cross report to the EFPS

140
00:09:03,360 --> 00:09:10,240
because state law provides that the.

141
00:09:10,240 --> 00:09:14,240
Cross report to the EFPS.

142
00:09:14,240 --> 00:09:17,240
Is only released by the Department of.

143
00:09:17,240 --> 00:09:18,240
Right.

144
00:09:18,240 --> 00:09:20,240
Family and protective services.

145
00:09:20,240 --> 00:09:25,240
So I think that's kind of the evidence for me.

146
00:09:25,240 --> 00:09:30,980
So there is no evidence that the city attorney was required

147
00:09:30,980 --> 00:09:34,240
to release this information.

148
00:09:34,240 --> 00:09:39,240
Nor would he have had, or she involved to.

149
00:09:39,240 --> 00:09:43,240
Well, he might be violating the law by reducing it.

150
00:09:43,240 --> 00:09:44,240
True.

151
00:09:44,240 --> 00:09:45,240
True.

152
00:09:45,240 --> 00:09:47,240
Privacy is pretty sacred.

153
00:09:47,240 --> 00:09:48,240
Yes.

154
00:09:48,240 --> 00:09:54,370
And it's a protection not only of that 13 year old minor,

155
00:09:54,370 --> 00:09:57,240
but also of their family.

156
00:09:57,240 --> 00:09:58,240
And that was my next question.

157
00:09:58,240 --> 00:10:01,429
As a special education teacher, confidentiality and then

158
00:10:01,429 --> 00:10:04,450
who has the privilege of getting certain information is

159
00:10:04,450 --> 00:10:05,240
very much.

160
00:10:05,240 --> 00:10:06,240
Yeah.

161
00:10:06,240 --> 00:10:10,320
And that's exactly how it went to me is like what basis did

162
00:10:10,320 --> 00:10:13,240
he have to obtain information that.

163
00:10:13,240 --> 00:10:17,850
He did see a turn he had no no he was not authorized by law

164
00:10:17,850 --> 00:10:20,240
to release that report.

165
00:10:20,240 --> 00:10:23,240
Right.

166
00:10:23,240 --> 00:10:27,240
There's no evidence that he was required to.

167
00:10:27,240 --> 00:10:31,240
So check me on the statement of this motion.

168
00:10:31,240 --> 00:10:35,870
There is no evidence that section two was violated and then

169
00:10:35,870 --> 00:10:39,840
the city attorney was not required to release this

170
00:10:39,840 --> 00:10:41,240
information.

171
00:10:41,240 --> 00:10:43,240
By law.

172
00:10:43,240 --> 00:10:46,240
And it would have been a break in the law.

173
00:10:46,240 --> 00:10:47,240
Yeah.

174
00:10:47,240 --> 00:10:52,730
Or I would say maybe a violation of confidentiality if he

175
00:10:52,730 --> 00:10:56,240
has released that cross report.

176
00:10:56,240 --> 00:10:59,240
So do I hear a second on that?

177
00:10:59,240 --> 00:11:01,240
I'll second.

178
00:11:01,240 --> 00:11:02,240
All right.

179
00:11:02,240 --> 00:11:07,240
Any more discussion we need to have on item two?

180
00:11:07,240 --> 00:11:08,240
Okay.

181
00:11:08,240 --> 00:11:09,240
Ready to vote.

182
00:11:09,240 --> 00:11:13,690
So all in favor of this motion as I just previously stated

183
00:11:13,690 --> 00:11:15,240
raise your hand.

184
00:11:15,240 --> 00:11:16,240
Aye.

185
00:11:16,240 --> 00:11:20,240
Okay.

186
00:11:20,240 --> 00:11:21,240
Item three.

187
00:11:21,240 --> 00:11:25,169
Assert the privilege of the officials or employees city

188
00:11:25,169 --> 00:11:27,240
position for the purpose.

189
00:11:27,240 --> 00:11:30,789
But when you look back to his complaint isn't he only alleg

190
00:11:30,789 --> 00:11:36,330
ing a violation of 273(e)(2) he's not saying one three four

191
00:11:36,330 --> 00:11:37,240
five.

192
00:11:37,240 --> 00:11:38,240
Yes.

193
00:11:38,240 --> 00:11:42,490
So I don't think you have to make a motion for the rest of

194
00:11:42,490 --> 00:11:43,240
them.

195
00:11:43,240 --> 00:11:46,350
That confused me because when I was looking at I was

196
00:11:46,350 --> 00:11:49,240
wondering did he know that they're all two.

197
00:11:49,240 --> 00:11:55,240
So yeah I would assume that he meant just section two of E.

198
00:11:55,240 --> 00:11:58,000
Well I will say that I looked through the rest of the code

199
00:11:58,000 --> 00:12:00,639
to see if there was anything else that might have been

200
00:12:00,639 --> 00:12:05,240
violated and I did not find any evidence of that.

201
00:12:05,240 --> 00:12:10,240
And he titles it violation of its ordinance 273(e)(2).

202
00:12:10,240 --> 00:12:13,240
So he has to address one per year.

203
00:12:13,240 --> 00:12:14,240
Okay.

204
00:12:14,240 --> 00:12:16,240
Four or five.

205
00:12:16,240 --> 00:12:17,240
Okay.

206
00:12:17,240 --> 00:12:22,240
So we can vote it on two.

207
00:12:22,240 --> 00:12:28,450
Is there any other discussion that we need to have before

208
00:12:28,450 --> 00:12:34,649
we move on to deciding if this complaint is actionable or

209
00:12:34,649 --> 00:12:36,240
baseless?

210
00:12:36,240 --> 00:12:39,240
No I don't think so.

211
00:12:39,240 --> 00:12:46,240
So I would entertain a motion that this is not actionable.

212
00:12:46,240 --> 00:12:47,240
That is baseless.

213
00:12:47,240 --> 00:12:48,240
That is baseless.

214
00:12:48,240 --> 00:12:50,240
Sorry.

215
00:12:50,240 --> 00:12:52,240
That is baseless.

216
00:12:52,240 --> 00:12:53,240
Okay.

217
00:12:53,240 --> 00:12:54,240
A second.

218
00:12:54,240 --> 00:12:58,240
A second.

219
00:12:58,240 --> 00:12:59,240
Okay.

220
00:12:59,240 --> 00:13:06,240
Any more discussion that we need to have about it?

221
00:13:06,240 --> 00:13:07,240
Okay.

222
00:13:07,240 --> 00:13:09,240
Ready to vote?

223
00:13:09,240 --> 00:13:11,240
All in favor?

224
00:13:11,240 --> 00:13:12,240
Aye.

225
00:13:12,240 --> 00:13:13,240
Aye.

226
00:13:13,240 --> 00:13:17,240
Okay.

227
00:13:17,240 --> 00:13:22,240
Do we need to talk about revolting?

228
00:13:22,240 --> 00:13:24,240
You just listed it as baseless.

229
00:13:24,240 --> 00:13:26,240
At this point we vote it as baseless.

230
00:13:26,240 --> 00:13:27,240
Okay.

231
00:13:27,240 --> 00:13:28,240
Okay.

232
00:13:28,240 --> 00:13:31,409
But for the record I think the person sincerely believed

233
00:13:31,409 --> 00:13:34,240
there was a violation so I don't think it was frivolous.

234
00:13:34,240 --> 00:13:35,240
I would agree.

235
00:13:35,240 --> 00:13:38,240
I think he was a concerned citizen.

236
00:13:38,240 --> 00:13:39,240
Right.

237
00:13:39,240 --> 00:13:42,240
That really tried to make sure that everything was done.

238
00:13:42,240 --> 00:13:46,070
The thing that concerned me is that this is the second

239
00:13:46,070 --> 00:13:52,490
complaint of the same person against the same person and we

240
00:13:52,490 --> 00:13:56,240
've already covered this one out.

241
00:13:56,240 --> 00:14:00,990
My concern is that these, while it's really, this is

242
00:14:00,990 --> 00:14:06,899
important, it's really important that we do our due

243
00:14:06,899 --> 00:14:10,669
diligence, but it costs the city money each time we have a

244
00:14:10,669 --> 00:14:11,240
complaint.

245
00:14:11,240 --> 00:14:13,240
And it costs the taxpayers.

246
00:14:13,240 --> 00:14:15,240
So, yeah.

247
00:14:15,240 --> 00:14:18,240
But you can't take that into consideration.

248
00:14:18,240 --> 00:14:21,539
People have a right to file a complaint under the ordinance

249
00:14:21,539 --> 00:14:24,769
and have the panel consider and have the taxpayers pay for

250
00:14:24,769 --> 00:14:25,240
it.

251
00:14:25,240 --> 00:14:28,389
I just would hope that there's not another complaint on the

252
00:14:28,389 --> 00:14:29,240
same thing.

253
00:14:29,240 --> 00:14:31,240
Yeah.

254
00:14:31,240 --> 00:14:33,590
Well maybe we need to do these follow those three strikes

255
00:14:33,590 --> 00:14:34,240
you're out.

256
00:14:34,240 --> 00:14:35,240
Yeah.

257
00:14:35,240 --> 00:14:39,240
That would have to be approved in the ordinance.

258
00:14:39,240 --> 00:14:41,240
Yeah.

259
00:14:41,240 --> 00:14:44,240
There's things I would like to look at in the ordinance.

260
00:14:44,240 --> 00:14:47,240
We are working with what we have.

261
00:14:47,240 --> 00:14:53,240
So, it is now 546.

262
00:14:53,240 --> 00:14:58,240
And this meeting is adjourned.

263
00:14:58,240 --> 00:14:59,240
Thank you.

264
00:14:59,240 --> 00:15:01,240
Thank you.