WEBVTT

00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:07.020
 Good morning and welcome to the regularly scheduled Public Utilities Board meeting.

00:00:07.020 --> 00:00:12.340
 It is September 29th at 9 a.m. and the meeting is called to order.

00:00:12.340 --> 00:00:16.240
 Do we have any presentations from the public?

00:00:16.240 --> 00:00:19.100
 Seeing none we'll move on to the consent agenda.

00:00:19.100 --> 00:00:27.560
 We need to pull items M and N to discuss and close session.

00:00:27.560 --> 00:00:30.120
 Does anybody have any other items they wish to pull?

00:00:30.120 --> 00:00:33.120
 I have a question.

00:00:33.120 --> 00:00:39.440
 I had requested some further information from the Director of Water and Wastewater about

00:00:39.440 --> 00:00:43.960
 items B through H because there were so many chemicals and didn't clarify which chemical

00:00:43.960 --> 00:00:47.900
 was for which process and I don't know if other members of the board would like to see

00:00:47.900 --> 00:00:51.280
 that before we vote on those things.

00:00:51.280 --> 00:00:52.280
 We sent them to everyone.

00:00:52.280 --> 00:00:53.800
 Oh you did send it out to everyone?

00:00:53.800 --> 00:00:54.800
 Yes sir, I emailed it to everyone.

00:00:54.800 --> 00:00:55.800
 Okay.

00:00:55.800 --> 00:00:56.800
 Yes sir.

00:00:56.800 --> 00:00:57.800
 But thank you very much.

00:00:57.800 --> 00:01:06.060
 Would anybody like to discuss the chemicals or is everybody good with the email we received?

00:01:06.060 --> 00:01:09.720
 If no one has an interest in it I will not ask to pull them from the consent agenda but

00:01:09.720 --> 00:01:15.520
 I thought I'd give everybody the chance if they wanted to have a look at that.

00:01:15.520 --> 00:01:16.520
 Thank you.

00:01:16.520 --> 00:01:23.520
 Okay seeing, I think everybody got the email this weekend so with that I'll consider approval

00:01:23.520 --> 00:01:28.200
 of items A, a motion for approval for items A through L.

00:01:28.200 --> 00:01:29.800
 So moved.

00:01:29.800 --> 00:01:30.800
 Second.

00:01:30.800 --> 00:01:32.440
 All in favor say aye.

00:01:32.440 --> 00:01:33.440
 Aye.

00:01:33.440 --> 00:01:38.320
 Motion carries unanimously.

00:01:38.320 --> 00:01:42.640
 Now moving on to our items for individual consideration.

00:01:42.640 --> 00:01:48.520
 First item for individual consideration is approval of the September 15th minutes.

00:01:48.520 --> 00:01:54.280
 We have a motion and a second.

00:01:54.280 --> 00:01:57.720
 That was, Lee was the second on that.

00:01:57.720 --> 00:01:58.720
 All in favor say aye.

00:01:58.720 --> 00:01:59.720
 Aye.

00:01:59.720 --> 00:02:01.560
 Any opposed?

00:02:01.560 --> 00:02:03.860
 Motion carries unanimously.

00:02:03.860 --> 00:02:17.200
 We are also going into closed session to discuss items B and C. So I guess we will start with

00:02:17.200 --> 00:02:22.640
 item D. Consider recommending approval of resolution for City of Denton for the City

00:02:22.640 --> 00:02:48.360
 of Denton Water Master Plan.

00:02:48.360 --> 00:02:53.080
 So good morning, I'm Kyle Pedigo, Planning and Engineering Division Manager for Water

00:02:53.080 --> 00:02:54.080
 Utilities.

00:02:54.080 --> 00:02:58.960
 I'm here today to present our update to the Water Master Plan.

00:02:58.960 --> 00:03:03.200
 The current Water Master Plan was adopted in December 2018 and was used as a planning

00:03:03.200 --> 00:03:05.680
 tool for the Water Utilities Department.

00:03:05.680 --> 00:03:10.520
 The Water Master Plan projects growth and identifies water infrastructure that is needed

00:03:10.520 --> 00:03:17.400
 to support that growth through the 5, 10 and 25 year development windows.

00:03:17.400 --> 00:03:21.920
 The Water Master Plan is updated regularly out of necessity when the prior Water Master

00:03:21.920 --> 00:03:30.780
 Plan no longer, is no longer accurate with what the city is seeing in growth and projected

00:03:30.780 --> 00:03:32.000
 infrastructure needs.

00:03:32.000 --> 00:03:37.760
 The 2018 Water Master Plan estimated lower growth in the outer regions and higher growth

00:03:37.760 --> 00:03:42.520
 in the infill, which is not accurate when compared to the growth trends that we've observed

00:03:42.520 --> 00:03:46.080
 over the last seven years.

00:03:46.080 --> 00:03:50.600
 The objective of the Water Master Plan update is to address the imbalance growth trends

00:03:50.600 --> 00:03:53.280
 seen from the 2018 Water Master Plan.

00:03:53.280 --> 00:03:58.840
 This imbalance is driving the need for additional treatments, treatment and conveyance infrastructure

00:03:58.840 --> 00:04:02.080
 that wasn't contemplated in 2018.

00:04:02.080 --> 00:04:06.720
 The current overall growth rate has exceeded projections in the western and northern parts

00:04:06.720 --> 00:04:14.560
 of the city, driven primarily by industrial land use initiatives south of US 380 and west

00:04:14.560 --> 00:04:22.000
 of I-35, as well as the hunter and coal developments in the west.

00:04:22.000 --> 00:04:27.880
 This heat map shows the change in the growth trend between the projections in the 2018

00:04:27.880 --> 00:04:31.500
 Master Plan and the observed rates over the past seven years.

00:04:31.500 --> 00:04:37.240
 The map is color coded where red represents areas where the growth has far exceeded the

00:04:37.240 --> 00:04:45.360
 2018 projections and blue represents areas where the growth is lower than the 2018 projections.

00:04:45.360 --> 00:04:51.840
 As you can see, the high growth area is concentrated around the perimeter of the city, while infill,

00:04:51.840 --> 00:05:02.000
 which is the expansion of the mostly developed core, has slowed.

00:05:02.000 --> 00:05:06.400
 The three growth charts shown here compare the observed population growth, which is the

00:05:06.400 --> 00:05:12.000
 solid line, in each service area to the projections from the 2018 Water Master Plan.

00:05:12.000 --> 00:05:17.960
 In Service Area 1A, we've seen a 65% reduction compared to the projection.

00:05:17.960 --> 00:05:24.000
 In Service Area 1B, we've seen a 185% increase from the projection.

00:05:24.000 --> 00:05:26.960
 And in Service Area 2, go ahead.

00:05:26.960 --> 00:05:28.080
 I just have a question.

00:05:28.080 --> 00:05:36.040
 These service areas, are they based on the current water production facilities and their

00:05:36.040 --> 00:05:41.480
 conveyance or are they just by percentage of growth?

00:05:41.480 --> 00:05:47.520
 So the service areas were established at the previous Water Master Plan and it's not specific

00:05:47.520 --> 00:05:52.140
 to the water facility since our entire system is interconnected.

00:05:52.140 --> 00:05:58.140
 So Lake Louisville water and Lake Ray Roberts water serve the entire city.

00:05:58.140 --> 00:06:03.700
 The service areas are established for specific growth regions.

00:06:03.700 --> 00:06:09.600
 So the heat map is based off the service areas, so you see 1A is the center, downtown, which

00:06:09.600 --> 00:06:14.880
 typically requires less infrastructure growth, versus 1B, which is the perimeter and 2, which

00:06:14.880 --> 00:06:15.880
 is the west.

00:06:15.880 --> 00:06:19.440
 Okay, so these are growth-based areas, not service-based areas.

00:06:19.440 --> 00:06:20.440
 Correct.

00:06:20.440 --> 00:06:24.100
 Okay, thank you.

00:06:24.100 --> 00:06:28.760
 And then Service Area 2, we've seen a 14% increase.

00:06:28.760 --> 00:06:33.320
 These are all compiled with data through the end of 2024, but the growth trends that we're

00:06:33.320 --> 00:06:40.020
 seeing in 2025 are aggressive and consistent with this trend.

00:06:40.020 --> 00:06:41.880
 So our consultants work with the city of...

00:06:41.880 --> 00:06:43.400
 I'm sorry, one more question.

00:06:43.400 --> 00:06:47.880
 Water service unit, is that a meter or is that like a million gallons a year or something?

00:06:47.880 --> 00:06:52.600
 The water service unit is based off of the meter size, which is based off of consumption.

00:06:52.600 --> 00:06:58.920
 So our base service unit is our 5/8 by 3/4 meter, which is enough for a single family

00:06:58.920 --> 00:06:59.920
 household.

00:06:59.920 --> 00:07:04.800
 So one unit might be a house, 50 units might be a house, or 50 houses, or like a small

00:07:04.800 --> 00:07:05.800
 commercial.

00:07:05.800 --> 00:07:10.800
 Yes, or like an industrial use or something like that.

00:07:10.800 --> 00:07:14.400
 So our consultant worked with the city of Denton's development service department to

00:07:14.400 --> 00:07:18.520
 create growth projections for the next 25-year window.

00:07:18.520 --> 00:07:22.320
 This projection helps to form the capital improvement plan to accommodate what the city

00:07:22.320 --> 00:07:25.880
 will see in development during that timeframe.

00:07:25.880 --> 00:07:33.600
 In the 0-5 year window, we see an 8.6% growth projection that tapers down to a 2.9% growth

00:07:33.600 --> 00:07:42.240
 in the 5-10 year window and down further to a 2% growth rate in the 25-year window.

00:07:42.240 --> 00:07:48.200
 To estimate growth, we used a multitude of internal data sources, such as existing water

00:07:48.200 --> 00:07:54.840
 meter data, plan developments in the 25-year development window, and the comprehensive

00:07:54.840 --> 00:08:01.400
 plan, which helps to determine future land use categories as well as associated population

00:08:01.400 --> 00:08:02.400
 projections.

00:08:02.400 --> 00:08:07.960
 Furthermore, we reviewed historic and current population projections from the North Central

00:08:07.960 --> 00:08:10.000
 Texas Council of Governments.

00:08:10.000 --> 00:08:14.360
 All of these sources are then combined and used to build the population base on which

00:08:14.360 --> 00:08:16.760
 the capital improvements are planned.

00:08:16.760 --> 00:08:23.680
 The master plan is a living document that changes to adapt the treatment and conveyance

00:08:23.680 --> 00:08:28.360
 systems according to the city's evolving needs, and to ensure that water efforts meet the

00:08:28.360 --> 00:08:36.340
 Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Planning and Permitting Standards.

00:08:36.340 --> 00:08:41.240
 The capital improvement plan prioritizes projects to optimize the city budget.

00:08:41.240 --> 00:08:47.720
 It utilizes existing capacity available in existing infrastructure to accommodate future

00:08:47.720 --> 00:08:49.440
 growth.

00:08:49.440 --> 00:08:55.040
 It improves the system operation by serving customers more efficiently and improving water

00:08:55.040 --> 00:09:00.140
 quality, and it ensures water reliability by guaranteeing water supply is adequate to

00:09:00.140 --> 00:09:05.600
 meet the anticipated demand and ensure redundancy in the system.

00:09:05.600 --> 00:09:10.760
 Because the population growth projections were lower in the 2018 water master plan,

00:09:10.760 --> 00:09:15.560
 the conveyance and treatment improvements of that capital improvement plan were less

00:09:15.560 --> 00:09:21.520
 intense compared to what we're seeing today.

00:09:21.520 --> 00:09:26.040
 So this shows the capital improvement plan projected cost for the 25-year window for

00:09:26.040 --> 00:09:29.920
 both the 2018 water master plan and today's update.

00:09:29.920 --> 00:09:37.000
 The 2018 water master plan anticipated $245 million worth of infrastructure over that

00:09:37.000 --> 00:09:43.580
 time period, while that's upped to $1.124 billion in today's update.

00:09:43.580 --> 00:09:48.360
 The reason for the large difference in the projected costs are material costs, which

00:09:48.360 --> 00:09:56.640
 have over doubled since 2018, primarily due to inflation and shortages through COVID.

00:09:56.640 --> 00:10:01.600
 The population growth in the outer regions is occurring much faster than anticipated,

00:10:01.600 --> 00:10:06.360
 so the city of Denton's water conveyance system must be expanded to those regions in order

00:10:06.360 --> 00:10:09.040
 to serve the customers.

00:10:09.040 --> 00:10:15.640
 And finally, the overall population growth exceeding expectations, more treatment capacity

00:10:15.640 --> 00:10:23.120
 is necessary, which causes further expansion of the water treatment plants.

00:10:23.120 --> 00:10:26.920
 So the next step is to bring this to city council tomorrow, September 30th for consideration

00:10:26.920 --> 00:10:29.640
 and adoption.

00:10:29.640 --> 00:10:32.640
 Any questions?

00:10:32.640 --> 00:10:40.920
 Could you go to slide 8 for me, so the 2018 you said it was lowered, what was the reason

00:10:40.920 --> 00:10:42.040
 for that?

00:10:42.040 --> 00:10:48.480
 So the 2018 didn't consider as much growth in the outer regions as we're seeing, so the

00:10:48.480 --> 00:10:54.560
 conveyance infrastructure was much smaller based on the growth projections that were

00:10:54.560 --> 00:10:56.240
 put together at that time.

00:10:56.240 --> 00:10:59.280
 And could you go to slide 7 for me?

00:10:59.280 --> 00:11:08.440
 So on the 10 year and the 25 year projections, is that based on interpolation with land availability

00:11:08.440 --> 00:11:09.440
 and zoning?

00:11:09.440 --> 00:11:14.360
 Yes, so with the comprehensive plan, so the shorter term projections, the 5 and 10 year

00:11:14.360 --> 00:11:20.280
 are based off of known developments and known areas where growth is going to occur.

00:11:20.280 --> 00:11:25.120
 When you get out to the 25 year window, that's based more on the comprehensive plan, which

00:11:25.120 --> 00:11:31.360
 looks at land usage and then estimates population based off of those usage types and acreage.

00:11:31.360 --> 00:11:36.560
 And so if we run into, let's say, another 2018 where there's been a decrease, what you're

00:11:36.560 --> 00:11:43.780
 presenting, is there a sliding scale as to how you will address those expenses?

00:11:43.780 --> 00:11:46.560
 We don't have a sliding scale established, but what we do is--

00:11:46.560 --> 00:11:49.320
 Pardon the expression, just you know what I mean by that.

00:11:49.320 --> 00:11:53.760
 Right, we go through, so that's with this as a living document, we go through and do

00:11:53.760 --> 00:11:59.320
 regular updates to it to accommodate differences in growth trends.

00:11:59.320 --> 00:12:04.960
 So if suddenly we're seeing lower growth in an area, we can push some of that infrastructure

00:12:04.960 --> 00:12:10.300
 need out into the farther windows, which would change that final number.

00:12:10.300 --> 00:12:14.760
 And with this being the master plan, if something were to occur like that, then does that come

00:12:14.760 --> 00:12:19.860
 back to us for just the courtesy of knowing that there's going to be that kind of change

00:12:19.860 --> 00:12:24.520
 and then we can recalibrate costs and such at that time, or am I--

00:12:24.520 --> 00:12:28.440
 Yes, we can provide updates as we make changes, regular updates.

00:12:28.440 --> 00:12:32.000
 I would like that, if nothing else, just prudent.

00:12:32.000 --> 00:12:33.000
 Thank you very much.

00:12:33.000 --> 00:12:34.000
 Yes.

00:12:34.000 --> 00:12:40.640
 Are there any additional questions?

00:12:40.640 --> 00:12:43.960
 Could you move back to slide six?

00:12:43.960 --> 00:12:51.520
 So continuing on the vein of Mr. Rayner's comments, I've seen this over the last 20

00:12:51.520 --> 00:12:56.000
 years in other areas in the city.

00:12:56.000 --> 00:13:00.420
 We're growing really fast right now, 8%, 10%, whatever it is.

00:13:00.420 --> 00:13:06.440
 But in five years, we're going to curve down to like a 2% growth rate or 3% growth rate.

00:13:06.440 --> 00:13:15.960
 And of course, what happens is that 7%, 8%, 9% growth continues to the next decade.

00:13:15.960 --> 00:13:19.600
 So I realize that we don't want to over plan.

00:13:19.600 --> 00:13:22.160
 We don't want to make it where that line goes straight up.

00:13:22.160 --> 00:13:32.380
 And in 2040, we're looking at 700,000 population yet, and then put in a $5 billion plan.

00:13:32.380 --> 00:13:34.800
 But that's likely where we're headed.

00:13:34.800 --> 00:13:40.480
 If you look at the map over here, you have all the shaded areas where we're talking about

00:13:40.480 --> 00:13:41.480
 growth.

00:13:41.480 --> 00:13:45.480
 And then there's a whole lot of other stuff, other area that's just unmarked.

00:13:45.480 --> 00:13:52.240
 There's no growth planned at all kind of north of maybe Milam Road area.

00:13:52.240 --> 00:13:56.440
 But there are I don't know how many thousands of acres out there.

00:13:56.440 --> 00:14:00.440
 And then same thing on the southwest and the far south, maybe mostly built out, but there's

00:14:00.440 --> 00:14:01.920
 still areas of development there.

00:14:01.920 --> 00:14:09.880
 So I'm just making that comment to say that I know that we're going to come back in the

00:14:09.880 --> 00:14:11.760
 next five years.

00:14:11.760 --> 00:14:12.760
 That growth rate is going to continue.

00:14:12.760 --> 00:14:18.240
 And we're going to have to update it again to account for that additional growth.

00:14:18.240 --> 00:14:24.320
 I don't know what the balance is between being conservative, not over projecting, but also

00:14:24.320 --> 00:14:28.840
 making this realistic where we can plan 10 or 15 years in the future.

00:14:28.840 --> 00:14:35.000
 Because when we're talking about billion dollar water treatment plants and land acquisition

00:14:35.000 --> 00:14:39.480
 and new conveyance systems for entirely new wastewater treatment plants, you know, those

00:14:39.480 --> 00:14:43.160
 are 20 year processes.

00:14:43.160 --> 00:14:56.000
 And if we make our projections too low, then we're always racing to catch up to the growth.

00:14:56.000 --> 00:15:00.600
 So just my comment is we need this update.

00:15:00.600 --> 00:15:09.920
 And I would I would like to see how we can make the longer term forecasts as realistic

00:15:09.920 --> 00:15:15.120
 as possible to to really account for the fact that we're going to we're going to need like

00:15:15.120 --> 00:15:21.480
 this one point one billion dollars in infrastructure is kind of what we know we need basically

00:15:21.480 --> 00:15:26.520
 in the next probably 10 years, and then we're really going to need another one or two billion,

00:15:26.520 --> 00:15:30.840
 especially in 2040 dollars at that time.

00:15:30.840 --> 00:15:34.680
 We could provide that information with regular updates as well as it changes.

00:15:34.680 --> 00:15:38.920
 Are you suggesting they make some modifications to this?

00:15:38.920 --> 00:15:42.520
 I don't I think it's I think it's too late in this process.

00:15:42.520 --> 00:15:46.440
 And you know, there's like I said, there's I know there's this balance of we don't want

00:15:46.440 --> 00:15:47.440
 to overestimate.

00:15:47.440 --> 00:15:52.440
 We don't want to like make these huge, scary projections, but we tend to decide for the

00:15:52.440 --> 00:15:58.880
 last 20 years, I've seen on planning on city budget on, you know, utility budget, this

00:15:58.880 --> 00:16:02.240
 five years of growth, and then it's going to flatten out and it just kind of keeps having

00:16:02.240 --> 00:16:06.040
 this little the turndown that never happens really.

00:16:06.040 --> 00:16:09.880
 And it and it skews our planning and makes it where we're always behind because we're

00:16:09.880 --> 00:16:13.480
 really only planning for the next five years of growth and not the next 10 or 20 years

00:16:13.480 --> 00:16:20.160
 of growth, so just something that going forward, we want to be aware of and not and I think

00:16:20.160 --> 00:16:24.120
 everybody on the commission agrees, it's not really realistic that we're just going to

00:16:24.120 --> 00:16:28.360
 stop growing in 2030.

00:16:28.360 --> 00:16:39.040
 If there are no other questions or comments, chair would entertain a motion.

00:16:39.040 --> 00:16:43.240
 Second, we have a motion and a second.

00:16:43.240 --> 00:16:48.680
 For recommending approval of adoption of the new water master plan.

00:16:48.680 --> 00:16:49.880
 All in favor say aye.

00:16:49.880 --> 00:16:50.880
 Aye.

00:16:50.880 --> 00:16:51.880
 Any opposed?

00:16:51.880 --> 00:16:53.920
 The motion carries unanimously.

00:16:53.920 --> 00:16:56.040
 Thank you.

00:16:56.040 --> 00:16:59.800
 Thank you.

00:16:59.800 --> 00:17:01.720
 Now we'll move into management reports.

00:17:01.720 --> 00:17:06.840
 Mr. Chair, members of the board, we don't have any items on the new business section.

00:17:06.840 --> 00:17:07.840
 There's nothing pending.

00:17:07.840 --> 00:17:12.360
 I do want to point out on the future agenda items, there's two things that are coming

00:17:12.360 --> 00:17:18.640
 up for you on the 13th, we'll be bringing to you the 2026 schedule, so we'll try to

00:17:18.640 --> 00:17:19.640
 get that out to you.

00:17:19.640 --> 00:17:24.680
 So please look at that and if there's dates on there that may be a conflict, you know,

00:17:24.680 --> 00:17:29.240
 there might still be an opportunity here to try to reorder some of that schedule and then

00:17:29.240 --> 00:17:37.020
 I want to also remind everyone that on June 12th, we will be reelecting or electing officers

00:17:37.020 --> 00:17:39.120
 to this board, right?

00:17:39.120 --> 00:17:46.240
 There are no term limits per se, but certainly if one of our incumbents is no longer wishing

00:17:46.240 --> 00:17:52.400
 to continue in a position, please let us know so that we can communicate that to the other

00:17:52.400 --> 00:17:53.400
 board members.

00:17:53.400 --> 00:17:57.040
 If somebody's interested, I can't remember the last time we had a contested race, you

00:17:57.040 --> 00:18:01.440
 know, but if there is that, there is a process for us to go through that as well.

00:18:01.440 --> 00:18:06.120
 I'm sure Marcella would love to help us kind of walk through that, but with that, that

00:18:06.120 --> 00:18:12.140
 is our management update, happy to answer any questions you may have.

00:18:12.140 --> 00:18:18.480
 Seeing no questions, I think we can go ahead and move on to our closed meeting.

00:18:18.480 --> 00:18:23.920
 So the Public Utilities Board will now at 918 a.m. convene into a closed meeting to

00:18:23.920 --> 00:18:28.520
 deliberate closed meeting items set forth in the agenda.

00:18:28.520 --> 00:18:35.760
 Item A, deliberations regarding certain public power utilities competitive matters, and item

00:18:35.760 --> 00:18:40.600
 B, deliberations regarding real property.

00:18:40.600 --> 00:18:51.400
 Do I need to call those as two separate ones or can we call it as one?

00:18:51.400 --> 00:18:57.680
 The Public Utilities Board has now at 952 a.m. reconvened from the closed session and no

00:18:57.680 --> 00:18:59.680
 official action was taken.

00:18:59.680 --> 00:19:08.320
 We'll just mention that Commissioner Rayner was recused from the item B in the closed

00:19:08.320 --> 00:19:11.920
 session.

00:19:11.920 --> 00:19:23.880
 We will now consider items for individual consideration B, the recommendation of adoption

00:19:23.880 --> 00:19:29.880
 of an ordinance for a PPA for utility scale battery storage.

00:19:29.880 --> 00:19:30.880
 Thank you.

00:19:30.880 --> 00:19:34.640
 Good morning, Chairman, members of the PUB.

00:19:34.640 --> 00:19:40.200
 My name is Jose Gaitan, Executive Manager of Power Supply for DME and I'm here to provide

00:19:40.200 --> 00:19:49.120
 you a presentation on one of the 1,300 proposals that we received as part of RFP 8678 that

00:19:49.120 --> 00:19:57.480
 was issued back in November of 2024 to continue to procure additional renewable sources for

00:19:57.480 --> 00:20:02.560
 the Denton Renewable Resource Plan.

00:20:02.560 --> 00:20:07.800
 Again as a summary for some of the challenges that both ERCOT and DME will be facing over

00:20:07.800 --> 00:20:13.940
 the next several years into the future is this concept of the duck curve.

00:20:13.940 --> 00:20:19.360
 When the duck curve is those hours between 6 and 9 p.m. as the sun goes over the horizon

00:20:19.360 --> 00:20:25.240
 solar production goes down to zero and wind will be ramping into the afternoon, could

00:20:25.240 --> 00:20:26.800
 be close to zero.

00:20:26.800 --> 00:20:34.280
 The reduction in renewable output and the demand still being high due to temperatures

00:20:34.280 --> 00:20:39.920
 whether it's high temperatures in the summer or low temperatures in winter creates price

00:20:39.920 --> 00:20:47.060
 volatility as the renewable production drops down into those hours.

00:20:47.060 --> 00:20:54.720
 And so the utility, our customers, could be impacted as more and more of our load is exposed

00:20:54.720 --> 00:20:58.960
 to those $5,000 prices.

00:20:58.960 --> 00:21:08.440
 So as a way to mitigate those risks we're bringing forward is battery storage solution.

00:21:08.440 --> 00:21:16.880
 Some of the details of this proposal is it's a 10-year term for 100 megawatts of capacity

00:21:16.880 --> 00:21:19.240
 with two hours of duration.

00:21:19.240 --> 00:21:25.480
 It's available starting June of 2026 and the pricing is inclusive of federal investment

00:21:25.480 --> 00:21:29.600
 tax credits.

00:21:29.600 --> 00:21:35.400
 It is a financial hedge for the utility, right, so it allows us to avoid having to go and

00:21:35.400 --> 00:21:41.240
 procure additional sources of energy over in the market.

00:21:41.240 --> 00:21:47.480
 It's a stop gap from those events where we have abnormally hot winters or abnormally

00:21:47.480 --> 00:21:49.260
 cold winters.

00:21:49.260 --> 00:21:57.920
 So it helps mitigate some of those cost increases to our utility while, you know, providing

00:21:57.920 --> 00:22:04.480
 us a stop gap for those additional costs that we've seen in the past like 2023 where we

00:22:04.480 --> 00:22:12.100
 saw a $30 million increase in costs for purchase power.

00:22:12.100 --> 00:22:20.320
 This facility is located in central Texas, just southeast of Waco, about 70 miles southeast.

00:22:20.320 --> 00:22:26.960
 This facility is owned and operated by Jupiter Power, one of the largest battery storage

00:22:26.960 --> 00:22:31.440
 owners in ERCOT and developer in North America.

00:22:31.440 --> 00:22:39.760
 They have over 11,000 megawatts of battery storage.

00:22:39.760 --> 00:22:44.120
 As we've mentioned, this facility, again, is a financial hedge for the utility.

00:22:44.120 --> 00:22:50.000
 It's available in June of 2026 and the majority of the project is not subject to tariffs,

00:22:50.000 --> 00:22:55.480
 which is great for us in reducing costs overall for this project.

00:22:55.480 --> 00:23:02.360
 Again, our staff recommendation is to provide a recommendation to City Council to approve

00:23:02.360 --> 00:23:07.100
 the Tudwell Prairie II PPA.

00:23:07.100 --> 00:23:08.520
 And that concludes my presentation.

00:23:08.520 --> 00:23:14.360
 Are there any questions?

00:23:14.360 --> 00:23:16.080
 I see no questions.

00:23:16.080 --> 00:23:17.280
 I just want to have a comment.

00:23:17.280 --> 00:23:25.720
 This is a good way for DME, I think, to begin operating a battery.

00:23:25.720 --> 00:23:29.440
 It'll be built and operated by Jupiter, but we will have control of it.

00:23:29.440 --> 00:23:30.440
 That's correct.

00:23:30.440 --> 00:23:35.560
 So this will be a good way for DME to get that experience.

00:23:35.560 --> 00:23:41.320
 It has a cost, but it has a risk benefit, a pretty good risk benefit.

00:23:41.320 --> 00:23:45.240
 And I expect that we'll be seeing more of these in the coming decade as they become

00:23:45.240 --> 00:23:49.200
 more common and are caught as prices come down.

00:23:49.200 --> 00:23:53.360
 With that comment, I would entertain a motion recommending adoption.

00:23:53.360 --> 00:23:56.880
 I recommend it's adoption and I second your comments.

00:23:56.880 --> 00:23:57.880
 We have a motion.

00:23:57.880 --> 00:23:58.880
 Do we have a second?

00:23:58.880 --> 00:23:59.880
 I'll just second the motion.

00:23:59.880 --> 00:24:00.880
 All right.

00:24:00.880 --> 00:24:01.880
 I think Mr. Neuquist second.

00:24:01.880 --> 00:24:02.880
 All in favor say aye.

00:24:02.880 --> 00:24:03.880
 Aye.

00:24:03.880 --> 00:24:04.880
 The motion carries unanimously.

00:24:04.880 --> 00:24:16.880
 We'll move on to item for individual consideration C, recommending adoption of an ordinance for

00:24:16.880 --> 00:24:24.120
 a PPA for the Blue Summit 1 wind generation.

00:24:24.120 --> 00:24:27.540
 Good morning, Chair, members of the Public Utility Board.

00:24:27.540 --> 00:24:31.680
 My name is Jose Gaitan, Executive Manager, Power Supply for DME.

00:24:31.680 --> 00:24:37.800
 I'm here to present to you the proposal for Blue Summit 1 wind generation facility as

00:24:37.800 --> 00:24:48.200
 part of RFP 8678 that was issued in November of 2024 to procure additional renewable energy

00:24:48.200 --> 00:24:56.520
 sources to continue our 100% goal of having renewable energy as part of the Dention Renewable

00:24:56.520 --> 00:25:01.000
 Resource Plan.

00:25:01.000 --> 00:25:08.600
 Some of the details of this proposal is it's a 15-year term for about 140 megawatts of

00:25:08.600 --> 00:25:09.920
 capacity.

00:25:09.920 --> 00:25:13.000
 The good thing is that this facility is available now.

00:25:13.000 --> 00:25:19.680
 The prices for this project are inclusive of current federal production tax credits.

00:25:19.680 --> 00:25:24.320
 So because it's already producing energy, it's more than likely going to be grandfathered

00:25:24.320 --> 00:25:30.560
 in should there be any changes in the future for the PTC.

00:25:30.560 --> 00:25:37.040
 On top of that, this facility, it provides us a diversification of generation production

00:25:37.040 --> 00:25:41.960
 as we have a lot of solar projects currently.

00:25:41.960 --> 00:25:48.840
 This facility will, again, allow us to generate power at night and into the afternoons, which

00:25:48.840 --> 00:25:54.600
 is where we believe what we'll have a need due to the duck curve and other issues that

00:25:54.600 --> 00:26:00.480
 we see as nighttime prices start to increase, as we see in more and more development of

00:26:00.480 --> 00:26:05.740
 data center load, which will start absorbing a lot more of that cheaper nighttime power.

00:26:05.740 --> 00:26:13.880
 So we see in the future increases in nighttime power costs going forward.

00:26:13.880 --> 00:26:23.240
 Again, this facility is owned and operated by Nextera, one of the largest generators

00:26:23.240 --> 00:26:28.320
 of clean power in not just ERCOT, but North America.

00:26:28.320 --> 00:26:36.580
 They have over 119 projects in the U.S. and Canada.

00:26:36.580 --> 00:26:42.520
 The Blue Summit One Wind Facility is located near Vernon, Texas, near the Panhandle, and

00:26:42.520 --> 00:26:44.360
 so we have a great source.

00:26:44.360 --> 00:26:46.720
 Production will be relatively high.

00:26:46.720 --> 00:26:55.160
 Again, this is a repowered facility with more modern blades and modern turbines.

00:26:55.160 --> 00:27:00.960
 So great location, great facility, great owner, actually.

00:27:00.960 --> 00:27:06.900
 So now we kind of take a look at what our portfolio of renewables looks like.

00:27:06.900 --> 00:27:12.740
 If Council were to approve this facility, that would bring us to about 594 megawatts

00:27:12.740 --> 00:27:13.900
 of energy.

00:27:13.900 --> 00:27:22.240
 The 15-year term for this facility will take us all the way to January of 2040.

00:27:22.240 --> 00:27:33.600
 So again, just recapping what we've gone over, again, this facility helps us by diversifying

00:27:33.600 --> 00:27:40.400
 the renewable production over the day and years going out.

00:27:40.400 --> 00:27:45.440
 We have production at night, which is one thing that we're not seeing as much of is

00:27:45.440 --> 00:27:48.200
 development of wind farms.

00:27:48.200 --> 00:27:53.320
 So this may be one of the last abilities to get some additional wind.

00:27:53.320 --> 00:27:56.960
 Again, this facility is available now.

00:27:56.960 --> 00:28:05.680
 It doesn't really provide us 100% price mitigation, but again, the diversity we believe is a value

00:28:05.680 --> 00:28:12.120
 to this facility, and it helps us continue our renewable goals.

00:28:12.120 --> 00:28:20.360
 So with that, the staff recommendation is that the PUB provide a recommendation to Council

00:28:20.360 --> 00:28:24.120
 to approve the Blue Summit One Wind PPA.

00:28:24.120 --> 00:28:26.840
 And with that, that concludes my presentation.

00:28:26.840 --> 00:28:27.840
 Are there any questions?

00:28:27.840 --> 00:28:36.080
 >> I just have a comment, I really appreciate the complementary nature of these two proposals

00:28:36.080 --> 00:28:37.080
 together.

00:28:37.080 --> 00:28:38.080
 >> Absolutely.

00:28:38.080 --> 00:28:39.080
 >> Excellent work by staff.

00:28:39.080 --> 00:28:42.080
 >> Thank you.

00:28:42.080 --> 00:28:43.080
 >> Any further questions?

00:28:43.080 --> 00:28:47.480
 I'll entertain a motion.

00:28:47.480 --> 00:28:52.600
 We have a motion.

00:28:52.600 --> 00:28:53.600
 And we have a second.

00:28:53.600 --> 00:28:55.960
 All in favor say aye.

00:28:55.960 --> 00:28:59.200
 And the motion carries unanimously.

00:28:59.200 --> 00:29:08.200
 And now we'll move on to our last two items pulled from the consent agenda.

00:29:08.200 --> 00:29:21.040
 And we will bid Commissioner Rayner farewell for the day.

00:29:21.040 --> 00:29:32.400
 Now, item M, consider of the consent agenda, consider recommending adoption.

00:29:32.400 --> 00:29:35.880
 Do we consider them both together or do we have to vote on them individually?

00:29:35.880 --> 00:29:36.880
 >> On them individually.

00:29:36.880 --> 00:29:37.880
 >> Okay.

00:29:37.880 --> 00:29:43.000
 Consider adopting, recommending adoption of an ordinance to purchase 3.682 acres of land

00:29:43.000 --> 00:29:47.440
 for the DME, near the DME campus.

00:29:47.440 --> 00:29:48.440
 >> So moved.

00:29:48.440 --> 00:29:49.440
 >> We have a motion.

00:29:49.440 --> 00:29:50.440
 Do we have a second?

00:29:50.440 --> 00:29:51.440
 >> Second.

00:29:51.440 --> 00:29:52.440
 >> Commissioner Newquist.

00:29:52.440 --> 00:29:53.440
 All in favor say aye.

00:29:53.440 --> 00:29:54.440
 >> Aye.

00:29:54.440 --> 00:29:55.440
 >> Motion carries.

00:29:55.440 --> 00:30:02.320
 Now, item N, recommended adoption of an ordinance purchasing 9.218 acres of land along Shady

00:30:02.320 --> 00:30:03.320
 Oaks Drive.

00:30:03.320 --> 00:30:04.320
 >> So moved.

00:30:04.320 --> 00:30:06.120
 >> We have a motion.

00:30:06.120 --> 00:30:07.120
 And another second.

00:30:07.120 --> 00:30:08.120
 All in favor?

00:30:08.120 --> 00:30:09.120
 >> Aye.

00:30:09.120 --> 00:30:10.880
 >> Motion carries unanimously.

00:30:10.880 --> 00:30:13.320
 I believe we are adjourned.

