WEBVTT

00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:02.320
 >> Okay, good morning everyone.

00:00:02.320 --> 00:00:05.780
 We're here with the City of Denning Mobility Committee.

00:00:05.780 --> 00:00:08.960
 It's Wednesday, March 26th, 2025, 10 AM.

00:00:08.960 --> 00:00:11.040
 We're in the council work session room.

00:00:11.040 --> 00:00:14.920
 We have determined that a quorum is present,

00:00:14.920 --> 00:00:20.720
 so we'll convene at this meeting at this time.

00:00:20.720 --> 00:00:23.420
 We're going to start with the first item,

00:00:23.420 --> 00:00:26.920
 citizens comments on the agenda items.

00:00:26.920 --> 00:00:28.460
 With that being said,

00:00:28.460 --> 00:00:33.600
 we're asking individuals are only able to comment on one time per agenda item.

00:00:33.600 --> 00:00:36.040
 Each speaker is to be given a total of three minutes.

00:00:36.040 --> 00:00:39.120
 I'm going to try to keep up with those minutes or unless somebody else wants to.

00:00:39.120 --> 00:00:44.300
 The chair will call your name and speak at the appropriate time and when addressing the committee.

00:00:44.300 --> 00:00:46.480
 Please step forward to the front of the room,

00:00:46.480 --> 00:00:48.220
 state your name, your address,

00:00:48.220 --> 00:00:52.480
 and direct your comments to the chair and the committee.

00:00:56.000 --> 00:00:59.040
 Items for individual consideration,

00:00:59.040 --> 00:01:07.160
 MC 25-010, consider approval of the minutes of February 26th, 2025.

00:01:07.160 --> 00:01:09.400
 Can I get a motion?

00:01:09.400 --> 00:01:14.000
 >> I have considered them and I moved that they be approved to submit it.

00:01:14.000 --> 00:01:19.740
 >> Okay. Do we just do the speaker's words?

00:01:19.740 --> 00:01:21.760
 I thought they picked their item for the agenda,

00:01:21.760 --> 00:01:22.960
 what they wanted to speak on.

00:01:22.960 --> 00:01:24.200
 So we're going to go back?

00:01:24.200 --> 00:01:30.200
 >> Yes. So the citizen comments all happen at the same time on this agenda at the beginning of the meeting.

00:01:30.200 --> 00:01:34.600
 >> Okay. So this is even though it's something else.

00:01:34.600 --> 00:01:38.760
 Okay. So our first person that we're going to have come up,

00:01:38.760 --> 00:01:42.400
 Ms. Jane Piperlott, please come to the front.

00:01:42.400 --> 00:01:45.440
 You prefer to speak.

00:01:45.440 --> 00:01:48.360
 Hello, Ms. Jane. I haven't seen you in a while.

00:01:48.360 --> 00:01:50.080
 >> Yeah, I know. We got a check.

00:01:50.080 --> 00:01:51.600
 >> All right.

00:01:51.600 --> 00:01:54.600
 >> And you too, you are hard to get hold of.

00:01:54.600 --> 00:01:58.800
 >> All right. I'm hard to get hold of?

00:01:58.800 --> 00:02:02.000
 >> Joe is.

00:02:02.000 --> 00:02:03.200
 I'm Jane Piperlott.

00:02:03.200 --> 00:02:07.040
 I live at 1407 North Austin.

00:02:07.040 --> 00:02:14.640
 I am here today to address item D, exhibit five.

00:02:14.640 --> 00:02:21.560
 I have a long history with this property, almost nine years.

00:02:21.560 --> 00:02:27.800
 The history of that property, which is across from the service center,

00:02:27.800 --> 00:02:33.800
 I had always been told it was bond election money,

00:02:33.800 --> 00:02:36.800
 but was corrected on that, so I don't know what's true.

00:02:38.600 --> 00:02:47.000
 But that property was in a bond issue at one time for

00:02:47.000 --> 00:02:51.000
 an expansion of the service center on that side of the road.

00:02:51.000 --> 00:02:55.200
 And because of that, they wanted to build a road up and

00:02:55.200 --> 00:02:58.840
 around the back of the building that would be there, so

00:02:58.840 --> 00:03:03.720
 that they wouldn't be going down McKinney to bother people.

00:03:03.720 --> 00:03:05.160
 And it would go to Mingo.

00:03:07.160 --> 00:03:14.880
 For some reason, they never had enough money to build the service center, so they scrapped the idea of the road.

00:03:14.880 --> 00:03:18.480
 Now, they've used that road for several excuses.

00:03:18.480 --> 00:03:24.520
 This time, it's because of the quiet zone.

00:03:24.520 --> 00:03:30.360
 But there are ways that are much cheaper to create a quiet zone

00:03:30.360 --> 00:03:35.920
 without having to close Willis and Pertain.

00:03:35.920 --> 00:03:39.360
 Which, if you close Pertain, you're going to lock people into that neighborhood.

00:03:39.360 --> 00:03:42.600
 Their only way out is going to be out McKinney.

00:03:42.600 --> 00:03:50.560
 But anyways, so that property has always kind of been,

00:03:50.560 --> 00:03:57.760
 well, we want a road there, but we're not doing it, and they've always had all these excuses.

00:03:57.760 --> 00:03:59.520
 It's a beautiful piece of property.

00:03:59.520 --> 00:04:01.520
 It does not need to be destroyed.

00:04:01.520 --> 00:04:04.160
 We've destroyed enough trees and enough property.

00:04:05.920 --> 00:04:11.480
 This got approved by the voters by deception.

00:04:11.480 --> 00:04:18.800
 This is the League of Women Voters guide for that bond proposal.

00:04:18.800 --> 00:04:25.360
 That proposal was labeled streets.

00:04:25.360 --> 00:04:32.960
 It says the issuance of $45 million for streets, levying a tax and

00:04:32.960 --> 00:04:38.240
 payment thereof, proposal A allocates funding for designing, acquiring, constructing,

00:04:38.240 --> 00:04:43.600
 renovating, improving, extending, upgrading, updating, and equipping city streets.

00:04:43.600 --> 00:04:50.400
 Bridges, multimodal sidewalks, improvement as well as related incidental

00:04:50.400 --> 00:04:56.800
 improvements, and the purchase of land, easement, right of way, and other properties of interest.

00:04:56.800 --> 00:05:00.840
 Mingo Road from Bell Avenue to Mockingbird.

00:05:00.840 --> 00:05:05.320
 Roodale Street from 380 to Mingo.

00:05:05.320 --> 00:05:09.280
 Railroad Quiet Zone from Mockingbird Lane to Frame Street.

00:05:09.280 --> 00:05:15.600
 Nowhere in that bond proposal does it say anything about this road being built through that.

00:05:15.600 --> 00:05:18.960
 Nowhere on the city websites was there anything.

00:05:18.960 --> 00:05:24.000
 The only reference was the, it said road alignment.

00:05:24.000 --> 00:05:27.880
 And it said C Mobility 2040.

00:05:27.880 --> 00:05:29.880
 >> Okay, Ms. Piperlunt?

00:05:29.880 --> 00:05:31.200
 >> Yes.

00:05:31.200 --> 00:05:35.200
 >> I know exactly where you're talking about, but your time has expired.

00:05:35.200 --> 00:05:40.000
 So we appreciate everything you've just told us and I've certainly written my notes down.

00:05:40.000 --> 00:05:41.400
 >> I got one more sentence.

00:05:41.400 --> 00:05:46.120
 I'm asking you to delay this until an investigation is done on this.

00:05:46.120 --> 00:05:47.040
 >> All right, thank you, ma'am.

00:05:47.040 --> 00:05:47.540
 >> Thank you.

00:05:55.720 --> 00:06:02.420
 All right, our next speaker is Ms. Lauren Penn, P-E-N-N, Lauren Penn.

00:06:02.420 --> 00:06:02.920
 Thank you, ma'am.

00:06:02.920 --> 00:06:08.960
 >> Hello, my name is Lauren Penn.

00:06:08.960 --> 00:06:14.560
 I live at 2308 Georgetown Drive in Denton in the North Lakes neighborhood.

00:06:14.560 --> 00:06:16.320
 I was here a month ago.

00:06:16.320 --> 00:06:19.640
 Since then, I wanted to give you guys an update on our neighborhood.

00:06:19.640 --> 00:06:24.680
 I was able to host a community walking audit.

00:06:24.680 --> 00:06:28.640
 We also just call it a walking tour, it's a great opportunity for our neighbors to get together.

00:06:28.640 --> 00:06:33.960
 I was able to invite some people from our staff and

00:06:33.960 --> 00:06:38.320
 had several council members there as well as council candidates.

00:06:38.320 --> 00:06:40.280
 We had a really great time together.

00:06:40.280 --> 00:06:45.200
 We met at the North Lakes Rec Center.

00:06:45.200 --> 00:06:51.280
 And immediately we were noticing a lack of a sidewalk from our neighborhood to the rec center,

00:06:51.280 --> 00:06:55.240
 which we really feel strongly that that should be done so

00:06:55.240 --> 00:06:59.400
 that we can access the great services at the rec center.

00:06:59.400 --> 00:07:05.480
 We also had a concern about, as Reeves Elementary, it should be ready to go and

00:07:05.480 --> 00:07:08.200
 students will be attending school there in August.

00:07:08.200 --> 00:07:11.840
 We are concerned that kids in our neighborhood who are zoned for

00:07:11.840 --> 00:07:16.280
 that school will not have a safe way to get to that school.

00:07:16.280 --> 00:07:19.920
 Our neighborhood kids could walk through North Lakes Park.

00:07:19.920 --> 00:07:24.400
 So we're curious what are the plans for having that sidewalk done.

00:07:24.400 --> 00:07:27.480
 So I just have on, if I need to say,

00:07:27.480 --> 00:07:34.360
 item C, the speed management and traffic calming action plan.

00:07:34.360 --> 00:07:39.800
 As we walked our neighborhoods streets together, a theme emerged that our neighborhood does

00:07:39.800 --> 00:07:43.160
 not feel safe or welcoming for pedestrians.

00:07:43.160 --> 00:07:47.160
 We had parents, seniors, children, and residents of all abilities.

00:07:47.160 --> 00:07:52.040
 They all shared concerns about, we have very wide intersections in our neighborhood.

00:07:52.040 --> 00:07:56.240
 And we have corners that are so wide that as we get to an intersection,

00:07:56.240 --> 00:08:00.360
 we feel really exposed and really unsafe in those areas.

00:08:00.360 --> 00:08:06.080
 We also have a lack of safe crossings for our students and, of course, missing sidewalks.

00:08:06.080 --> 00:08:12.000
 We have just a few sidewalks in the neighborhood closest to where Newton Razor used to be.

00:08:12.000 --> 00:08:14.440
 We also noticed something really helpful.

00:08:14.440 --> 00:08:20.060
 As we gathered and got to hang out, we noticed that we shared a desire to make our streets more walkable.

00:08:20.060 --> 00:08:22.160
 Our neighborhood wants to walk more.

00:08:22.160 --> 00:08:24.160
 We want to walk to businesses.

00:08:24.160 --> 00:08:26.720
 We want to walk to our school.

00:08:26.720 --> 00:08:29.320
 And we want to get to know each other.

00:08:29.320 --> 00:08:34.360
 We want to be able to have community to get out and get healthy as we walk around.

00:08:34.360 --> 00:08:37.400
 And our streets should really support that.

00:08:37.400 --> 00:08:43.000
 And so as our dent continues to grow, we are really excited to have this opportunity

00:08:43.000 --> 00:08:48.080
 to shape how that growth happens in a way that puts people first and not just cars.

00:08:48.080 --> 00:08:50.520
 So I have a few questions to follow up.

00:08:50.520 --> 00:08:56.280
 From our neighborhood specifically, we're wondering what low cost and high impact changes

00:08:56.280 --> 00:09:05.400
 like curb extensions or paint and post solutions could we pilot to make our intersections feel safer right now?

00:09:05.400 --> 00:09:13.960
 We also are wondering if with this traffic calming action plan, will walking audits

00:09:13.960 --> 00:09:23.680
 be a part of this planning process so that residents' voices can help shape this traffic calming plan?

00:09:23.680 --> 00:09:31.320
 And again, we're also wondering when will a sidewalk or a route to the elementary school be ready?

00:09:31.320 --> 00:09:38.560
 Will it be ready before August when our students and our kiddos as young as five will be getting to that school?

00:09:38.560 --> 00:09:41.160
 So those are my questions after our time.

00:09:41.160 --> 00:09:46.640
 We would love to share if once we finish our walking audit report,

00:09:46.640 --> 00:09:50.800
 we'd be happy to share that with anyone who might be interested in getting a copy.

00:09:50.800 --> 00:09:53.680
 >> You can come back.

00:09:53.680 --> 00:09:55.080
 Yes, we have questions.

00:09:55.080 --> 00:09:59.560
 >> Madam Chair, I know we can't ask questions back and forth because it's unprogrammed comments.

00:09:59.560 --> 00:10:08.120
 But I think we can say I would be interested in bringing the concept of walking audits back for further discussion.

00:10:08.120 --> 00:10:09.080
 >> Absolutely.

00:10:09.080 --> 00:10:10.560
 You all have that written down?

00:10:10.560 --> 00:10:12.320
 >> Thank you. >> They wrote it down.

00:10:12.320 --> 00:10:13.280
 Thank you, ma'am.

00:10:13.280 --> 00:10:20.240
 That was very insightful and very brave and much needed.

00:10:20.240 --> 00:10:21.640
 Thank you.

00:10:21.640 --> 00:10:35.000
 >> So we will go to B, MC, we didn't do the butchering, A, MC 25-010, consider approval of the minutes of February.

00:10:35.000 --> 00:10:36.280
 >> I made a motion.

00:10:36.280 --> 00:10:39.000
 I second.

00:10:39.000 --> 00:10:42.560
 >> Are there any questions?

00:10:42.560 --> 00:10:45.600
 All right, all in favor?

00:10:45.600 --> 00:10:47.160
 Okay, ayes have it.

00:10:47.160 --> 00:10:49.080
 Approval.

00:10:49.080 --> 00:11:05.160
 B, MC 25-011, receive a report and hold a discussion regarding the proposed FY 2025 Transportation Reinvestment Program trip funding application.

00:11:05.160 --> 00:11:13.040
 >> Good morning, Greg Scott, Transportation Services, and I'll start this presentation.

00:11:13.040 --> 00:11:27.400
 And it will be continued by Capital Projects.

00:11:27.400 --> 00:11:36.320
 So as you're probably aware, DCTA provides a portion of their revenues to us each year.

00:11:38.320 --> 00:11:46.880
 Based on projects that are mutually beneficial and within a quarter mile of existing transit.

00:11:46.880 --> 00:11:54.640
 Staff has identified three projects for 2025 funding.

00:11:54.640 --> 00:11:59.440
 And we will go into these more detailed, this is kind of an overview.

00:11:59.440 --> 00:12:02.000
 >> Overview, okay.

00:12:02.000 --> 00:12:06.720
 >> And two adjustments to 2022 projects.

00:12:09.200 --> 00:12:13.800
 I'm going to focus a little bit on that before we go on because it won't be detailed later.

00:12:13.800 --> 00:12:19.520
 But this adjustment costs zero dollars.

00:12:19.520 --> 00:12:27.600
 It is to make sure that we include planning in this project.

00:12:32.400 --> 00:12:49.080
 This kind of explains some shift in a project that brought intermodal improvements to the downtown square.

00:12:49.080 --> 00:12:52.320
 We came in under budget.

00:12:52.320 --> 00:12:58.880
 And so the remainder of the money from 2022 will be moved to downtown

00:12:58.880 --> 00:13:08.520
 for pedestrian improvements around the UPRR areas with the quiet zone.

00:13:08.520 --> 00:13:13.400
 Okay, so as promised, this is a little more of the details.

00:13:13.400 --> 00:13:19.320
 Project one is, or A, is Colorado Boulevard multimodal

00:13:19.320 --> 00:13:25.960
 improvements between loop 288 and the A train line.

00:13:28.800 --> 00:13:36.200
 These are all subject to planning, and we will engage the public in these.

00:13:36.200 --> 00:13:45.400
 But for budgeting purposes, we are assuming

00:13:45.400 --> 00:13:51.720
 that we will eliminate the sidewalk gaps on the south side of Colorado.

00:13:51.720 --> 00:13:59.920
 We will bring all of the south side of Colorado up to ADA standards.

00:13:59.920 --> 00:14:05.840
 Additionally, we'll provide bike lanes in both directions so

00:14:05.840 --> 00:14:10.720
 bikes can travel in the direction of cars, that is the concept.

00:14:10.720 --> 00:14:14.160
 Sorry, I jumped over it.

00:14:15.600 --> 00:14:24.800
 Project two is the Frye District, and with a focus on mulberry,

00:14:24.800 --> 00:14:30.000
 fairy, and fry, as shown in the dashed area.

00:14:30.000 --> 00:14:38.520
 Again, this will be subject to public involvement, and

00:14:38.520 --> 00:14:42.360
 this is what we'll kind of take that lead.

00:14:44.520 --> 00:14:47.440
 So with that, I'll turn it over.

00:14:47.440 --> 00:14:54.880
 >> Hey, good morning board members, Seth Garcia, Interim Director of Capital Projects.

00:14:54.880 --> 00:14:57.280
 So I'm gonna highlight a couple of projects that we're already currently

00:14:57.280 --> 00:15:01.040
 working on in Capital Projects, looking at some additional funding.

00:15:01.040 --> 00:15:04.440
 So this first one is the Katy Trail Extension.

00:15:04.440 --> 00:15:07.440
 As you may know, Mayhill Extension, the bridge,

00:15:07.440 --> 00:15:12.120
 closed the intersection just to the east or south of Edwards there.

00:15:13.280 --> 00:15:17.960
 In talking with DCTA, everybody sees it, a great opportunity to move that sidewalk

00:15:17.960 --> 00:15:21.880
 to the north side, if you will, of the railroad tracks there.

00:15:21.880 --> 00:15:25.400
 So we can eliminate the pedestrian crossing across the railroad tracks.

00:15:25.400 --> 00:15:27.880
 So again, ultimately, safety is the key there.

00:15:27.880 --> 00:15:32.360
 So what we're looking at doing is on the map,

00:15:32.360 --> 00:15:36.360
 install a new sidewalk along the north side of the railroad tracks.

00:15:36.360 --> 00:15:39.440
 And then we will close the crossing here.

00:15:39.440 --> 00:15:42.440
 And this existing southern portion of sidewalk will loop back and

00:15:42.440 --> 00:15:45.520
 bring you back to the bridge for connectivity there.

00:15:45.520 --> 00:15:50.280
 Part of this was approved in the 2023 DCTA.

00:15:50.280 --> 00:15:55.480
 What we found during our initial design review was we have a large floodway

00:15:55.480 --> 00:15:58.680
 issue right here where we're actually gonna have to install a pedestrian bridge.

00:15:58.680 --> 00:16:01.960
 So that's a lot of the increased costs that we're asking for here today.

00:16:01.960 --> 00:16:06.000
 Ultimately, this will bring all the connectivity for

00:16:06.000 --> 00:16:09.080
 the Katy Trail to be complete on that northern side.

00:16:12.800 --> 00:16:17.120
 As Greg mentioned earlier, More Street is a revised scope of work.

00:16:17.120 --> 00:16:19.360
 So essentially, what we're asking for

00:16:19.360 --> 00:16:24.440
 is to be able to use some tactical urbanism for this on-street trail portion.

00:16:24.440 --> 00:16:27.880
 That's gonna get more into planning and engagement with the community,

00:16:27.880 --> 00:16:30.960
 be able to put something out there as a pilot program, and

00:16:30.960 --> 00:16:35.920
 then ultimately go in with some permanent improvements.

00:16:35.920 --> 00:16:42.800
 So the original DCTA only agreement, excuse me, only allowed for

00:16:42.800 --> 00:16:46.920
 design and construction, again, we're wanting to utilize some of those funds for

00:16:46.920 --> 00:16:48.680
 planning and community engagement.

00:16:48.680 --> 00:16:54.520
 So again, that funding request is not changing, it's just a change in the scope.

00:16:54.520 --> 00:17:02.740
 And lastly, as Greg mentioned, we did have around $480,000 in savings for

00:17:02.740 --> 00:17:04.960
 the All Way Crossing project.

00:17:04.960 --> 00:17:09.760
 Part of the process for DCTA is that money goes back into the main pot, and

00:17:09.760 --> 00:17:13.360
 then we request from that main pot to be reallocated again.

00:17:13.360 --> 00:17:17.880
 So with inflation pressures that we've seen, we were looking for

00:17:17.880 --> 00:17:21.880
 a little bit of additional funding to help move forward the downtown and

00:17:21.880 --> 00:17:24.040
 UPRR Quiet Zone projects.

00:17:24.040 --> 00:17:28.360
 So that's what you see here, it would be almost $500,000 that would go towards

00:17:28.360 --> 00:17:32.760
 construction of that to provide pedestrian improvements at three of

00:17:32.760 --> 00:17:36.480
 those crossings, which is Hickory, McKinney, and Sycamore Street.

00:17:36.480 --> 00:17:40.440
 Again, those provide connectivity over to the DCTA,

00:17:40.440 --> 00:17:42.520
 Katy Trail, and the rail station.

00:17:42.520 --> 00:17:46.200
 And I'll turn it back to Greg for some next steps.

00:17:46.200 --> 00:18:00.320
 >> So with your approval, we will move forward, and this will go to the council.

00:18:00.320 --> 00:18:09.360
 And also for a resolution on April 27th, Farhan, 23rd.

00:18:09.360 --> 00:18:15.160
 Okay, we'll be going to DCTA board with these proposals.

00:18:15.160 --> 00:18:22.440
 >> Thank you, I certainly appreciate all that information.

00:18:22.440 --> 00:18:26.120
 Let's just start down this way and we'll work our way this way, I'll just do that.

00:18:26.120 --> 00:18:26.760
 >> Thank you, Chair.

00:18:26.760 --> 00:18:30.040
 I'm going to work backwards, so Seth, you may have to come back up.

00:18:30.040 --> 00:18:32.340
 >> Congratulations, by the way, Seth, on your interim position.

00:18:32.340 --> 00:18:40.080
 Okay, so on the reallocation of some of the downtown funds to the UPRR Quiet Zone

00:18:40.080 --> 00:18:45.400
 crossings, are those projects now fully funded, or are we still a little short?

00:18:45.400 --> 00:18:49.840
 >> So we're funded to what our OPCC is, which is our opinion of probable

00:18:49.840 --> 00:18:51.040
 construction cost.

00:18:51.040 --> 00:18:53.680
 So essentially, we're fully funded through design.

00:18:53.680 --> 00:18:57.920
 We have an idea from the railroad what the railroad agreement's going to be.

00:18:57.920 --> 00:19:02.400
 Once we actually bid for construction, we'll know the final number.

00:19:02.400 --> 00:19:07.160
 But to what our design engineer is saying the cost is right now, this will fund us.

00:19:07.160 --> 00:19:09.920
 >> Okay, and so y'all have them prioritized.

00:19:09.920 --> 00:19:12.680
 If it turns out we don't have enough for all of them,

00:19:12.680 --> 00:19:15.840
 you have a prioritized list, I assume, of which ones we'll target first.

00:19:15.840 --> 00:19:19.240
 >> So it is a Quiet Zone project, so we have to do all of it.

00:19:19.240 --> 00:19:24.120
 So it can't be in a small piece, so we would look, come back, work with finance,

00:19:24.120 --> 00:19:27.240
 come back to council, look for additional funding to make sure we could do it all.

00:19:27.240 --> 00:19:30.280
 >> Okay, so it's sort of all or nothing for this particular project.

00:19:30.280 --> 00:19:32.640
 >> Correct, yeah, and then again, this is a, sorry,

00:19:32.640 --> 00:19:35.680
 this was a continuation into the Mingo Quiet Zones as well.

00:19:35.680 --> 00:19:37.080
 So this will make that whole corridor.

00:19:37.080 --> 00:19:39.800
 So for prioritizing that to the north,

00:19:39.800 --> 00:19:42.560
 we can't leave this spot down here in the south as a gap.

00:19:42.560 --> 00:19:46.000
 >> Right, I'd like to interject.

00:19:46.000 --> 00:19:50.360
 Since we're on that topic, I think it would just, would it be appropriate if you all,

00:19:50.360 --> 00:19:55.600
 if anybody else have an opinion on that topic, I don't want to stop your flow.

00:19:55.600 --> 00:19:57.200
 >> Okay, just come back to me at the end.

00:19:57.200 --> 00:20:01.440
 I am, I will start with you again and we'll just see what's going on here.

00:20:01.440 --> 00:20:02.680
 Go ahead.

00:20:02.680 --> 00:20:07.200
 >> Okay, so since you have that up on the slide,

00:20:07.200 --> 00:20:12.360
 I guess maybe I'm just a little confused.

00:20:12.360 --> 00:20:15.200
 The trip funds are being, I mean,

00:20:15.200 --> 00:20:19.440
 I know we have an aggregate project with aggregate funding as you just described.

00:20:19.440 --> 00:20:20.000
 >> Correct.

00:20:20.000 --> 00:20:24.720
 >> But are we suggesting that street repair,

00:20:24.720 --> 00:20:28.920
 I mean, I know money is fungible and the whole project and you can move it from one pocket to another.

00:20:28.920 --> 00:20:32.320
 But are we allocating trip funds to street repair?

00:20:32.320 --> 00:20:37.280
 >> Yes and no. So essentially it goes into the bucket to fund the full projects.

00:20:37.280 --> 00:20:41.200
 A lot of the funding that's requested will go towards the sidewalk improvements,

00:20:41.200 --> 00:20:44.080
 the rail improvements, and then we'll have other funding sources

00:20:44.080 --> 00:20:48.640
 associated with the project that will cover the majority of the street infrastructure.

00:20:48.640 --> 00:20:53.760
 Sidewalks are considered part of the street infrastructure.

00:20:53.760 --> 00:20:56.720
 So that's why it's kind of grouped in that funding category.

00:20:56.720 --> 00:20:58.200
 >> That's an interesting question.

00:20:58.200 --> 00:21:02.080
 >> Yeah. The only reason I asked that question

00:21:02.080 --> 00:21:08.760
 is generally the trip funding is to facilitate transit options.

00:21:08.760 --> 00:21:13.920
 That's why we have the requirements of distance and access and density,

00:21:13.920 --> 00:21:17.320
 and all the other requirements that you did a good job mentioning.

00:21:17.320 --> 00:21:23.560
 So I want to be mindful that we're not piggy banking it as a way of doing

00:21:23.560 --> 00:21:27.640
 street repair that should be put on M&O or bonds

00:21:27.640 --> 00:21:35.160
 or another appropriate vehicle for street repair when we're trying to facilitate transit.

00:21:35.160 --> 00:21:38.640
 It's just, this is me not really resisting,

00:21:38.640 --> 00:21:44.240
 but asking us to be mindful when we're pooling money together as a project.

00:21:44.240 --> 00:21:46.040
 >> No, thank you for that. Yeah.

00:21:46.040 --> 00:21:51.400
 Part of the reason the sidewalk infrastructure is a little bit inflated on this is because the rail crossings.

00:21:51.400 --> 00:21:54.480
 So when we do rail crossings, you're increasing track panels.

00:21:54.480 --> 00:21:57.840
 Track panels have to be extended four feet past the sidewalk.

00:21:57.840 --> 00:22:06.600
 So you add a lot of incurred cost to put in the 10-foot trail or the 8-foot sidewalk that go into the rail infrastructure that inflates that number.

00:22:06.600 --> 00:22:10.880
 And so again, for the small sections of sidewalk that we're looking to implement,

00:22:10.880 --> 00:22:14.320
 the cost per linear foot is higher just because it's at the rail.

00:22:14.320 --> 00:22:16.920
 >> Okay, thank you. That's all for me, Chair.

00:22:16.920 --> 00:22:22.240
 And that answer was very appropriate because I had that on my mind as well.

00:22:22.240 --> 00:22:24.920
 It sounded like we were moving into street repair.

00:22:24.920 --> 00:22:25.920
 >> Yeah, understood.

00:22:25.920 --> 00:22:36.200
 >> But keeping in mind that we are just talking about transportation and walking is part of transportation and biking on those, it's part of the transportation.

00:22:36.200 --> 00:22:37.120
 >> Yes, ma'am.

00:22:37.120 --> 00:22:40.680
 >> Yes, ma'am. Oh, did you have great?

00:22:40.680 --> 00:22:42.800
 Yes, ma'am.

00:22:42.800 --> 00:22:46.520
 >> All right, so going back, or up one more side, yes.

00:22:46.520 --> 00:22:53.680
 Thank you all for including planning and finding a way to do that because I know, you know, it's going through a neighborhood.

00:22:53.680 --> 00:22:56.720
 So it's really good to work with the neighbors on this project.

00:22:56.720 --> 00:23:02.200
 And kudos for whoever had the idea to do tactical urbanism for this project.

00:23:02.200 --> 00:23:03.360
 Thank you.

00:23:03.360 --> 00:23:10.920
 So what I like about tactical urbanism for this specific project is what's cool about it is we put something in, we see how it works.

00:23:10.920 --> 00:23:12.680
 We ask for feedback from the residents.

00:23:12.680 --> 00:23:14.440
 Is this working? What's working? What's not?

00:23:14.440 --> 00:23:21.120
 We adjust it a little bit and we can keep adjusting it until we're happy with, until the neighbors are happy with the design.

00:23:21.120 --> 00:23:24.400
 And then we can maybe circle back at some point and do the more expensive permanent stuff.

00:23:24.400 --> 00:23:32.640
 So I appreciate us using a tactical urbanism approach for this one because that's a great way to not just be like, okay, here it is, we're done.

00:23:32.640 --> 00:23:34.160
 Oops, something didn't work.

00:23:34.160 --> 00:23:36.200
 Right. So it's just like, let's try this.

00:23:36.200 --> 00:23:37.480
 Oh, that doesn't work. Let's adjust it.

00:23:37.480 --> 00:23:39.760
 Right. So I want to thank you all for doing that.

00:23:39.760 --> 00:23:40.520
 That's all I have on that one.

00:23:40.520 --> 00:23:46.240
 That is great. This is a long time coming for those folks in their neighborhood.

00:23:46.240 --> 00:23:49.240
 So I'm very excited for them on this project.

00:23:49.240 --> 00:23:50.360
 Yes, sir.

00:23:50.360 --> 00:23:53.720
 So on this one, it was it was a little unclear to me.

00:23:53.720 --> 00:24:05.000
 Can you put a little color or detail on the the the lane separation concept that we're thinking about since some of it is sidewalks and some of it is in street?

00:24:05.000 --> 00:24:07.360
 And I would just could you add a little color to that?

00:24:07.360 --> 00:24:13.800
 Yeah, I'll let Greg go into that.

00:24:13.800 --> 00:24:15.560
 Let's see if this answers your question.

00:24:15.560 --> 00:24:19.840
 It's on street trail is what was as advertised.

00:24:19.840 --> 00:24:21.240
 Now, we will go.

00:24:21.240 --> 00:24:30.400
 The purpose of the public involvement is to flesh that out right to add the color through the public involvement.

00:24:30.400 --> 00:24:43.640
 Oh, so so do we have a starting point where like typically in the past, we've used the four inch bollards like on on Congress, like on Old North.

00:24:43.640 --> 00:24:46.400
 Some of them we have the little two inch by one centimeter.

00:24:46.400 --> 00:24:48.480
 I'm mixing units there.

00:24:48.480 --> 00:24:55.040
 Whatever the the the little flat ones, the yellow ones, we've used some of those in various locations.

00:24:55.040 --> 00:25:02.640
 I just was curious what our default lane separation concept was to take to the tactical urbanism.

00:25:02.640 --> 00:25:04.240
 We're not going to start at zero.

00:25:04.240 --> 00:25:10.120
 Are we solicit ideas or we're going to bring them something and for that, right?

00:25:10.120 --> 00:25:14.760
 If you're if you're speaking to bollard style, yeah, we are starting at zero.

00:25:14.760 --> 00:25:21.320
 I mean, I what goes into the cost has been the what you see on Congress.

00:25:21.320 --> 00:25:24.120
 OK, but that does not preclude anything else.

00:25:24.120 --> 00:25:31.360
 And that's a that's something that is very flexible to public engagement.

00:25:31.360 --> 00:25:37.120
 So the little armadillo humps or the or the concrete separators, that's all on the table.

00:25:37.120 --> 00:25:40.200
 Yeah. OK, cool. I appreciate that. Thank you.

00:25:40.200 --> 00:25:50.880
 I really appreciate the fact that you're taking it to the to the community at zero and ask them to help you decide what to start with or what they think.

00:25:50.880 --> 00:25:54.600
 So I think that's that's what their their process is. Thank you.

00:25:54.600 --> 00:26:01.280
 Anybody else? I do. Oh, I'm sorry.

00:26:01.280 --> 00:26:07.400
 Hold on. You skipped you. Yeah.

00:26:07.400 --> 00:26:12.720
 Did you want to say something to this? OK, just some clarification.

00:26:12.720 --> 00:26:17.920
 Slide six. The street that connects is going back to something else.

00:26:17.920 --> 00:26:20.280
 We were trying to finish. I beg your pardon.

00:26:20.280 --> 00:26:24.080
 Did you want to say something else? OK, now we're doing.

00:26:24.080 --> 00:26:30.400
 Did you want to say anything on six? What is where we think we're done with it?

00:26:30.400 --> 00:26:42.040
 OK, you can go ahead. OK. Sorry, I don't want to be the street that connects Avenue A with Fry Street.

00:26:42.040 --> 00:26:52.360
 Ferry, I swear in the world, did that come from probably Google Maps?

00:26:52.360 --> 00:26:56.160
 Are you certain that that's correct? No, I am not certain that that's correct.

00:26:56.160 --> 00:27:02.440
 And I used to own a business at 119 Avenue A.

00:27:02.440 --> 00:27:08.400
 I've never heard of Ferry Street. OK, would you see if that's correct?

00:27:08.400 --> 00:27:16.000
 Sure. I can also just take it off.

00:27:16.000 --> 00:27:27.640
 My yellow page ad said that it was across the street from the unit or the unit language building, the UNT language building.

00:27:27.640 --> 00:27:39.720
 But the yellow page ad said unit language building. And it also had my address is 119 Avia, A-V-E-A.

00:27:39.720 --> 00:27:43.840
 I didn't have to pay for that ad. Thank you for your consideration.

00:27:43.840 --> 00:27:50.360
 Oh, was that all you had? That's all I got.

00:27:50.360 --> 00:27:58.400
 OK, back down there. So, KD Trail. I don't remember which slide that was.

00:27:58.400 --> 00:28:03.960
 KD Trail. That one. Yeah, I mean, I don't think I have a question.

00:28:03.960 --> 00:28:13.680
 Just wanted to say thank you all for addressing that, because I think previously I had asked if the crossing across the railroad was going to remain open for Bike Ped.

00:28:13.680 --> 00:28:17.680
 And the initial answer was yes. And I shared that out to people who had asked me.

00:28:17.680 --> 00:28:26.440
 And then I heard that that got changed. So I'm glad that we have a work around now so that people can use the trail to get to Colorado slash Mayhill and go both directions.

00:28:26.440 --> 00:28:31.920
 So I really appreciate that connectivity. And I guess that's all I had for that one. So thank you.

00:28:31.920 --> 00:28:37.160
 All right. Anybody else on that one? Yes.

00:28:37.160 --> 00:28:40.880
 Yeah, I guess. And I think Susie would know more about this project than I do.

00:28:40.880 --> 00:28:49.840
 But just seeing that kind of initial number of two point five million, I guess I have some concern about that because, you know, I can look at projects in the next batch.

00:28:49.840 --> 00:28:55.720
 And it's the most expensive one is two hundred and fifty thousand dollars for these, you know, cheap things.

00:28:55.720 --> 00:28:59.880
 And we've been talking about wanting to do more of these cheap quick interventions.

00:28:59.880 --> 00:29:05.160
 So I haven't looked deeply into this particular project. So if this is particularly essential, then I understand that.

00:29:05.160 --> 00:29:11.280
 But looking at the relative cost, like 10 of the next project versus one of this, I have some concern over that.

00:29:11.280 --> 00:29:16.840
 Yeah, absolutely. And again, part of the reason is that large drainage floodplain area.

00:29:16.840 --> 00:29:23.960
 So, again, we're putting in a pedestrian bridge that's going to require structural engineering, again, just more of the design costs.

00:29:23.960 --> 00:29:30.840
 We're also going to have to get one easement from the property owner here on this kind of triangle pizza shaped on the corner here.

00:29:30.840 --> 00:29:38.640
 So that is impacting. Ultimately, with the CTA, the goal was take away the the crossing completely.

00:29:38.640 --> 00:29:45.240
 So by doing this, we're able to put it on the north side for folks that want to continue along the Cady Trail and then on the south side,

00:29:45.240 --> 00:29:56.640
 also provide them the opportunity to get back to Mayhill or make a big loop and get around to the to that north side again to continue on the trail.

00:29:56.640 --> 00:30:02.560
 Anybody else on this one on the next one, you know, either with this great or you're done.

00:30:02.560 --> 00:30:06.680
 I have one more. OK, one more. I have a question on Colorado Boulevard.

00:30:06.680 --> 00:30:15.280
 All right. We can pull that slide back up.

00:30:15.280 --> 00:30:20.600
 I forgot what slide that was. Yes, thank you.

00:30:20.600 --> 00:30:27.720
 So on the when we say bike lanes, are we talking on street or are we just saying there will be some sort of bike accommodation?

00:30:27.720 --> 00:30:40.360
 We don't know what yet. Both because we put in the costs on street with some protection.

00:30:40.360 --> 00:30:44.800
 But it is also subject to public involvement.

00:30:44.800 --> 00:30:51.080
 But the starting point, the starting thought prior to input is like maybe on street. Yes. All right.

00:30:51.080 --> 00:30:55.320
 That's all. I was just wanting clarification. Thank you.

00:30:55.320 --> 00:31:01.360
 I'm going to go. I'm just really happy that this project is coming along.

00:31:01.360 --> 00:31:08.280
 Do I understand that there's sidewalk? We're going to try to have sidewalks on both sides or just one side.

00:31:08.280 --> 00:31:15.360
 How does something like that work? It won't be complete on the north side, but it will be complete on the south side.

00:31:15.360 --> 00:31:19.720
 OK, complete and accessible. All right.

00:31:19.720 --> 00:31:35.480
 And I now understand that a portion of that is county property where the right road breaker where brinker is coming off Colorado and Brinker.

00:31:35.480 --> 00:31:40.360
 We have that Sally Beauty supply and a portion of that is county.

00:31:40.360 --> 00:31:45.640
 Now, are you all collaborating with the county to pay for that particular portion?

00:31:45.640 --> 00:31:56.680
 Because I know that over in that area before you get to the doctorate, that area doesn't have sidewalk there.

00:31:56.680 --> 00:32:00.520
 And so we definitely want to, you know, is that how that works?

00:32:00.520 --> 00:32:06.120
 Collaborating with the county so they can pay for that particular portion of the sidewalk.

00:32:06.120 --> 00:32:32.560
 Yes. Yes. OK, great. All right. That's what I was concerned about. But other than that, you know, this is a long time coming to. So we're glad to see that that's coming. Anybody else on this one? Yes, you did. Not on this one. I had earlier. OK. And Christine, you're good. You know, I want to see if you're.

00:32:32.560 --> 00:32:40.360
 Oh, yeah. OK. Would it be possible to potentially to potentially expand the scope on this one?

00:32:40.360 --> 00:32:55.120
 Just a little bit to incorporate a connection to the A train station there, just like a little jut out off of this, because I think, you know, if I were if I were heading north on the Cady Trail and I wanted to go on Colorado, I would I would have that easy swing.

00:32:55.120 --> 00:33:10.200
 But if I were headed south on the Cady Trail, I would probably cut through the A train station to access Colorado Boulevard and also just provide access for folks going to and from like Medical City, that sort of thing.

00:33:10.200 --> 00:33:18.960
 Yes, we can look into that. It also could be a project, a city project.

00:33:18.960 --> 00:33:25.920
 OK. So did you have anything else to come this way? Do you have anything?

00:33:25.920 --> 00:33:30.400
 All right, I'm good. And you can you go back to the budgeting slides that were at the beginning?

00:33:30.400 --> 00:33:40.880
 I love that we went backwards. I think it was super cool to stop on the I had a couple of questions on this in a real light sense.

00:33:40.880 --> 00:33:52.720
 How did we get to the savings? I mean, yay. I love savings. A big heart. But but how did how did we get there? What did we do to save half a million dollars?

00:33:52.720 --> 00:33:57.120
 Yeah, great question. So the original number was put together by our engineer.

00:33:57.120 --> 00:34:01.920
 We were able to utilize a internal city contract to build that with Floyd Smith.

00:34:01.920 --> 00:34:13.240
 That's our annual city contract. So, again, they were able to perform all the services that we needed for the hallway crossing using their contractual unit prices provided a massive savings.

00:34:13.240 --> 00:34:22.840
 Again, with small quantities, small scope projects, you typically get deemed on mobilization and other things that cause contractors to come and do the work.

00:34:22.840 --> 00:34:28.440
 Those costs were negated by the city contract using them because they're already working for us.

00:34:28.440 --> 00:34:33.920
 So that provide a pretty significant savings on that, which has allowed us to reallocate that funding.

00:34:33.920 --> 00:34:46.800
 Perfect. And for the overall budgeting, and I'm not sure it's probably you, but and I want to be mindful not to drift too off posting.

00:34:46.800 --> 00:34:58.400
 But are any of the trip funds endangered or encumbered in the discussions of regional mergers and reallocation of budgets?

00:34:58.400 --> 00:35:04.600
 I know the not the past of the twenty two, the twenty three that's encumbered.

00:35:04.600 --> 00:35:08.360
 They're not going to be able to adjust that. But the twenty five is more what I'm thinking of.

00:35:08.360 --> 00:35:14.120
 Yeah, nothing that I'm aware of. I don't know of anything right now.

00:35:14.120 --> 00:35:26.560
 OK, I'll hop on here from my attendance at the DCTA annual long midterm, long term planning retreat.

00:35:26.560 --> 00:35:32.880
 I forget which one it was this time, but the NCT Cog Rep kind of tossed that out.

00:35:32.880 --> 00:35:37.920
 There is like I have this crazy idea. I don't know that that's sort of an imminent plan.

00:35:37.920 --> 00:35:41.600
 I think that's more of a like long term visioning, long term aspirational.

00:35:41.600 --> 00:35:50.760
 All right. All right. Good. I mean, good in the sense that it doesn't affect this discussion.

00:35:50.760 --> 00:35:58.640
 Thank you. Yes. OK, just one last comment.

00:35:58.640 --> 00:36:04.640
 For the last two years, I've pitched the idea that we should use trip funding for purchasing bus routes.

00:36:04.640 --> 00:36:11.200
 It doesn't seem like there's appetite for that. So I'd like to scale back just for consideration for next year's trip funding.

00:36:11.200 --> 00:36:14.360
 Could we use it for future network planning?

00:36:14.360 --> 00:36:22.000
 Could we could we take a hundred, two hundred thousand dollars and consider using that for putting together a plan?

00:36:22.000 --> 00:36:28.080
 This is what the city wants to see for our bus service from DCTA so that we can use that to advocate and plan for the future.

00:36:28.080 --> 00:36:39.680
 Thank you. Who would be working on that particular subject with what area of transportation?

00:36:39.680 --> 00:36:48.080
 Is that yours? Can you respond to that?

00:36:48.080 --> 00:36:53.000
 Good morning. Farhan Butt, Deputy Director of Transportation Services Division.

00:36:53.000 --> 00:36:59.680
 This ties to DCTA's strategic plan and we are already coordinating with them on some of those efforts.

00:36:59.680 --> 00:37:03.840
 And so there is there is some limitation on what can go into their planning.

00:37:03.840 --> 00:37:09.760
 But we are working diligently with them to make sure that city's interests are looked into.

00:37:09.760 --> 00:37:22.440
 So when it comes to these kind of projects, we will take into account and make a prioritized list and provide them while they are planning for their new new networks or new routes.

00:37:22.440 --> 00:37:28.440
 Can we get a summary of some sort of where you all are in that particular process?

00:37:28.440 --> 00:37:37.440
 I mean, like, I don't know when you would like soon just give us an idea of when you say, well, we're working diligently with them.

00:37:37.440 --> 00:37:45.360
 What does that mean for us? So the process goes like when the planning starts, we will we'll circle back with more information on that.

00:37:45.360 --> 00:37:49.520
 But we went through the process is that we are participating in that meeting.

00:37:49.520 --> 00:37:53.240
 For example, this DCTA strategic planning meeting, we were part of that.

00:37:53.240 --> 00:38:07.520
 I recently requested for that those presentations, so we will look into those strategic planning efforts and then kind of, you know, try to merge our prioritization and then discuss with them.

00:38:07.520 --> 00:38:11.600
 OK, we'll look back for the hearing from you.

00:38:11.600 --> 00:38:18.240
 Yes, sir. I guess we've been working together too long because that was one of my exact questions.

00:38:18.240 --> 00:38:23.760
 As part of that, I'll just take off right from there as part of that.

00:38:23.760 --> 00:38:28.640
 Can I would love to see our recommendations from from you, Dr.

00:38:28.640 --> 00:38:37.960
 Butte, and as well as the sort of timeline and what what got kept and negotiated away.

00:38:37.960 --> 00:38:48.200
 And the reason I'll put some context into that is you're focused on the needs of Denton and DCTA is focused on the needs writ large for the whole transportation.

00:38:48.200 --> 00:38:59.880
 That they cover. And I would like to see that that engagement and interaction and how it changes overall and what the given takes are,

00:38:59.880 --> 00:39:05.600
 because we don't control them, but, you know, we influence policy that affects you.

00:39:05.600 --> 00:39:09.320
 So, you know, I'd be real curious about those sort of details.

00:39:09.320 --> 00:39:20.880
 But sure, we will provide that information. Also, we have to keep in mind that we do have a representative there that I literally haven't seen in two years.

00:39:20.880 --> 00:39:26.720
 Highly concerned about that. Don't know if they're making it to the meeting.

00:39:26.720 --> 00:39:31.480
 We haven't had an update. And now you're bringing this to us.

00:39:31.480 --> 00:39:36.520
 So I'd like to at least hear from our and you attend some, you attend the meeting.

00:39:36.520 --> 00:39:41.760
 And I'd like to hear from at least our representative sometime every quarter.

00:39:41.760 --> 00:39:49.120
 I don't know. But we got to hear from them. They Allison McGuire and in two years.

00:39:49.120 --> 00:39:58.560
 Well, I haven't heard her spoke speak. We've had DCTA in our presence, but I have not heard from Alice.

00:39:58.560 --> 00:40:05.320
 And I like to hear from Alice as the chair of this. That's what I'm going to be looking forward to.

00:40:05.320 --> 00:40:10.760
 Thank you. Anybody else? All right. Thank you. Thanks.

00:40:10.760 --> 00:40:24.720
 OK, so we're going to go ahead and move on to the next item CMC to five zero one to receive a report and hold a discussion regarding a speed management and traffic calming action plan.

00:40:24.720 --> 00:40:35.440
 30 minutes. Good morning, Scott.

00:40:35.440 --> 00:40:41.880
 Transportation services. And this is the second part of traffic calming.

00:40:41.880 --> 00:40:48.880
 And in the as to the connection to the city's goals and strategies,

00:40:48.880 --> 00:40:56.240
 it certainly hits the highest of the highest priority is human life over all road decisions.

00:40:56.240 --> 00:41:08.200
 And you'll see how this actually also falls into low stress bike ped facilities for all ages and abilities.

00:41:08.200 --> 00:41:18.640
 We'll go through a quick implementation plan, some opportunities midterm and discuss some economic benefits.

00:41:18.640 --> 00:41:27.960
 So the process of coming to this quick implementation plan was to glean from various sources,

00:41:27.960 --> 00:41:46.400
 including traffic police here, past and present traffic engineers, a speed study that was done in 2022 and other sources to identify some kind of larger potential projects.

00:41:46.400 --> 00:41:55.080
 They were prioritized based on our first assessment of community support construct ability.

00:41:55.080 --> 00:42:07.760
 And we wanted to coordinate with projects that were already on on a program for the area came down to.

00:42:07.760 --> 00:42:23.840
 In the map there, you can see eight projects that came out of that process, three of which you will see today with their with their concepts.

00:42:23.840 --> 00:42:43.120
 After this, we'll be looking at doing a speed study on these three to make sure there is an issue in the first place to establish a baseline so that we can see as we improve these areas,

00:42:43.120 --> 00:42:53.640
 how we move the needle and understand how the community feels about it now and afterwards.

00:42:53.640 --> 00:43:04.720
 Use, again, quick build or tactical urbanism and measure afterwards.

00:43:04.720 --> 00:43:20.000
 So the toolbox we have at our use basically falls into narrowing, into circles and medians and slowing turns.

00:43:20.000 --> 00:43:35.120
 You will see going as I go into this as we go into this ball bounce function are a major portion of this.

00:43:35.120 --> 00:43:37.920
 Here's a little video.

00:43:37.920 --> 00:43:49.280
 Good morning, everybody. I'm Alexis Pickering and today's word on the street is ball bounce ball bounce are an essential part of traffic calming.

00:43:49.280 --> 00:43:56.920
 And they're a really great land use design that essentially pinches traffic to make everybody safer.

00:43:56.920 --> 00:44:06.760
 And so what that actually does is it actually decreases the length that pedestrians and bicyclists have to cross into an intersection.

00:44:06.760 --> 00:44:09.800
 So it makes them safer because they don't have to cross as much traffic.

00:44:09.800 --> 00:44:20.040
 It also is an added bonus, it makes pedestrians and bicyclists more in the line of sight of drivers, so they're easier to spot.

00:44:20.040 --> 00:44:25.160
 It also gives the sense of moving and actually gets them to go slower.

00:44:25.160 --> 00:44:30.640
 So not only are they seeing them sooner, but they're slowing down to let them cross.

00:44:30.640 --> 00:44:34.240
 So it protects drivers just as much as it does pedestrians.

00:44:34.240 --> 00:44:37.720
 So everybody is using the same intersection safely.

00:44:39.800 --> 00:44:45.240
 Oh, no, no.

00:44:45.240 --> 00:44:53.240
 She apologizes.

00:44:53.240 --> 00:44:56.840
 There we go.

00:44:56.840 --> 00:44:59.920
 Yeah, no, I think we should let this play.

00:44:59.920 --> 00:45:25.240
 Okay, so these ball belts can also be with a different configurations, can do different things or to different degrees.

00:45:25.240 --> 00:45:41.840
 So we've called this situation where their two cars can pass side by side and narrow spot one because there's a narrow spot to which still allows two cars to pass.

00:45:41.840 --> 00:45:46.840
 But through striping, it visually narrows it even further.

00:45:46.840 --> 00:45:53.400
 But the actual the actual width is still the same.

00:45:53.400 --> 00:45:56.440
 Okay, you can stagger them.

00:45:56.440 --> 00:46:06.680
 So you could create a chain in a very neighborhood situation.

00:46:06.680 --> 00:46:14.320
 You may have a courtesy spot which says only one car can pass at a time.

00:46:14.320 --> 00:46:24.720
 And the the last that I'm highlighting is that a bulb out that goes to the center line of the street.

00:46:24.720 --> 00:46:33.680
 So it is designed to limit through traffic where cut throughs may exist.

00:46:33.680 --> 00:46:38.680
 So the car can only come through in one direction.

00:46:38.680 --> 00:46:44.040
 Mind you, this is only for the segment adjacent to the bulb out.

00:46:44.040 --> 00:46:48.000
 It does not make the entire street one way.

00:46:48.000 --> 00:46:55.880
 OK, so we're going through the corridor, the three corridors that are priorities.

00:46:55.880 --> 00:46:58.800
 One is Boulevard corridor.

00:46:58.800 --> 00:47:28.520
 The concept is to create a relaxing all ages, all abilities biking and ped facility on Boulevard by first slowing traffic and then limiting traffic specifically from downtown to university, limiting that cut through traffic.

00:47:28.520 --> 00:47:49.600
 And in this concept, which is also subject to public involvement, I've shown to bulb out side by side that with signage, maybe welcoming people to the community.

00:47:49.600 --> 00:48:02.920
 First, just and then after the businesses and such, when you get into the residential area, a half street closure.

00:48:02.920 --> 00:48:22.600
 At those locations and so the blue circles represent the neighborhood gateway and the red ones represent the half street closure.

00:48:22.600 --> 00:48:38.080
 Sycamore, it uses the gateway concept again that just slows traffic and signals to the drivers that this is a community.

00:48:38.080 --> 00:48:49.560
 And ped refuges, which are basically short medians that allows more comfortable crossing of the road and also slows traffic.

00:48:49.560 --> 00:49:19.200
 I've also shown a median here on Bell Street and industrial to limit traffic at that point so that you don't have people stopping and turning trying to turn left on Bell, cutting up through the neighborhood to get to to Sycamore.

00:49:19.200 --> 00:49:36.880
 And then Fry Street again, I think what I need to emphasize, we need to emphasize on this is this is a bigger area than the Fry Street that we showed in the trip presentation.

00:49:36.880 --> 00:49:41.920
 And the intent is to slow traffic before you get to Fry Street.

00:49:41.920 --> 00:50:00.600
 So it's a wider area, its treatments will be more diverse, we'll be looking at with the public, with the community, what can go there.

00:50:00.600 --> 00:50:13.240
 Next kind of midterm opportunities is we in the next few years will be redoing the mobility plan.

00:50:13.240 --> 00:50:28.080
 And we can we can target some objectives when we do that, increase the plan sensitivity, context sensitivity, whether a roads in a neighborhood or not.

00:50:28.080 --> 00:50:51.040
 As the use speeds as a metric when doing this, so if we have a really long wide road and we're not targeting, that's not a speed we want to encourage then that would be a way to look at system wide what speeds we might be encouraging.

00:50:51.040 --> 00:51:03.920
 And then widen the flexibility in the types of roads and one way that's done is shown in the lower right corner, it's called street typologies.

00:51:03.920 --> 00:51:18.800
 It is both functional class, which is used now, plus the area context or different characteristics that we think should also be reflected in the road design.

00:51:18.800 --> 00:51:25.280
 And that becomes the street typology, the closest community that does this is South Lake.

00:51:25.280 --> 00:51:32.360
 Another opportunity is the transportation criteria manual.

00:51:32.360 --> 00:51:40.600
 We're doing a bit of massaging to that right now and eventually in a few years we'll be taking a fresh look at it.

00:51:42.360 --> 00:51:49.220
 And some of the opportunities or objectives we could have there is to make

00:51:49.220 --> 00:51:59.160
 the bike pad and ADA portions of it as clear as much of the road sections are clear.

00:51:59.160 --> 00:52:07.920
 Again, widen the possibilities for treatments.

00:52:07.920 --> 00:52:13.440
 And also this is a possibility and

00:52:13.440 --> 00:52:22.160
 that is often communities have very strict standards and they have very aspirational goals.

00:52:22.160 --> 00:52:30.720
 But a way to approach that that we could use is a checklist of considerations, right?

00:52:30.720 --> 00:52:40.240
 To marry that strictness, right, that not quite strict, but not quite aspirational, but to formalize it.

00:52:40.240 --> 00:52:50.720
 Lastly, vision zero and complete streets are also opportunities.

00:52:50.720 --> 00:52:58.240
 We have direction to use a complete streets

00:53:00.720 --> 00:53:07.080
 framework, but we also could,

00:53:07.080 --> 00:53:13.600
 if we choose as a city to adopt a formal policy for

00:53:13.600 --> 00:53:20.280
 that and complete streets will just aid in this effort.

00:53:20.280 --> 00:53:29.920
 Because we were asked for the economic benefits, we were able to identify as you're aware,

00:53:29.920 --> 00:53:36.120
 there are societal benefits across the board, but also there are in fact

00:53:36.120 --> 00:53:42.360
 potential city budget benefits,

00:53:42.360 --> 00:53:51.680
 because actual enforcement with people has high operating costs.

00:53:51.680 --> 00:53:57.960
 Whereas if you make the initial investments in traffic calming and we know that it will work,

00:53:57.960 --> 00:54:04.920
 then those investments are relatively low.

00:54:04.920 --> 00:54:10.080
 And that is it for my presentation, our presentation.

00:54:10.080 --> 00:54:21.000
 >> I will start by saying that I'm on the zero vision committee.

00:54:21.000 --> 00:54:22.400
 >> Mm-hm.

00:54:22.400 --> 00:54:29.120
 >> And that was going to be my inquiry as to how connected you all are,

00:54:29.120 --> 00:54:35.480
 which is all the same people, to that process as we're looking to

00:54:35.480 --> 00:54:39.960
 reduce our fatality rates here in the city.

00:54:39.960 --> 00:54:47.960
 So I'd like to hear from Dr. Budson, have him to kind of explain to us what the vision zero is all about.

00:54:49.600 --> 00:54:52.920
 >> Dr. Han Butt, Deputy Director of Transportation Services.

00:54:52.920 --> 00:54:57.560
 For the vision zero process, we are as part of the phase two,

00:54:57.560 --> 00:55:02.160
 we are in the implementation planning stage, where we will identify some of the corridors,

00:55:02.160 --> 00:55:06.800
 some of the elements that we will use to reduce fatalities and

00:55:06.800 --> 00:55:09.840
 see disencapacitating injuries on denton streets.

00:55:09.840 --> 00:55:14.920
 As part of that process, once these projects are identified or corridors or elements,

00:55:16.520 --> 00:55:20.600
 traffic calming would become part of that process as well.

00:55:20.600 --> 00:55:27.720
 So they will be integrated, they will be embedded wherever the processes are needed.

00:55:27.720 --> 00:55:29.240
 They can talk to each other.

00:55:29.240 --> 00:55:32.200
 >> All right, thank you very much, appreciate it.

00:55:32.200 --> 00:55:34.680
 We just had a recent meeting with vision zero.

00:55:34.680 --> 00:55:38.760
 So do you want to get started, Dr.?

00:55:38.760 --> 00:55:42.200
 >> How do you want to do this, Chair?

00:55:42.200 --> 00:55:46.160
 Do you want to- >> Well, let's go ahead, you already had your hand up.

00:55:46.160 --> 00:55:46.920
 >> I'll start with you.

00:55:46.920 --> 00:55:54.600
 >> So then, let me lead with, I love the advanced planning and all that.

00:55:54.600 --> 00:55:57.160
 I think it's fabulous.

00:55:57.160 --> 00:56:00.320
 I'm really super stoked that we're moving in this direction.

00:56:00.320 --> 00:56:04.360
 I love the engineering approaches because they enforce things in ways that

00:56:04.360 --> 00:56:08.880
 education outreach and training just don't.

00:56:08.880 --> 00:56:18.640
 But having said that, getting people aware of the changes, EOT will be critical.

00:56:18.640 --> 00:56:24.080
 And so I encourage you to be very proactive.

00:56:24.080 --> 00:56:31.360
 Because sometimes folks will say things, well, I don't want a thing.

00:56:31.360 --> 00:56:34.440
 They'll have a knee-jerk response to it until it's explained to them and

00:56:34.440 --> 00:56:39.080
 the benefits and the costs associated, and then they live with a pilot project.

00:56:39.080 --> 00:56:41.680
 And then they're like, yeah, I was afraid for nothing.

00:56:41.680 --> 00:56:45.040
 And then they love it and we spread it over the rest of the city.

00:56:45.040 --> 00:56:50.640
 So I'm going to encourage those kinds of pilot projects to really help people

00:56:50.640 --> 00:56:53.080
 understand what they're engaging with.

00:56:55.560 --> 00:57:07.120
 I did, on slide three, the process and short list, I'd be really interested in

00:57:07.120 --> 00:57:14.040
 seeing some of the data that led you to get to these seven and what specific metrics.

00:57:14.040 --> 00:57:16.760
 I'm not asking for it here, we don't have enough time.

00:57:16.760 --> 00:57:20.640
 But I'd be really interested if you could share with the committee at some point,

00:57:22.400 --> 00:57:26.600
 what led you to these seven and then what led you to prior to these three.

00:57:26.600 --> 00:57:34.200
 So that's just my general question, could we get a gander at the data?

00:57:34.200 --> 00:57:39.280
 I know there's at least three people that are here on the board that love to re-analyze

00:57:39.280 --> 00:57:41.880
 the data and then take it back out into the public.

00:57:41.880 --> 00:57:47.200
 So we will help with the EOT, I'm volunteering to my fellow board members.

00:57:47.200 --> 00:57:51.800
 >> He's not talking about me, but- >> [LAUGH]

00:57:51.800 --> 00:57:53.080
 >> I will make a comment.

00:57:53.080 --> 00:57:58.240
 I would be interested to know when we get there in years to come.

00:57:58.240 --> 00:58:00.520
 Not because we're focusing on one, two, and three.

00:58:00.520 --> 00:58:06.200
 In years to come when we get to seven, there will be special characteristics for

00:58:06.200 --> 00:58:10.880
 historic districts that I will just be really interested in how we

00:58:10.880 --> 00:58:16.560
 incorporate the historicity into the planning.

00:58:16.560 --> 00:58:18.240
 I can say words.

00:58:18.240 --> 00:58:21.480
 >> We're going to make them gravel roads.

00:58:21.480 --> 00:58:25.680
 >> All right, so do you want to- >> Okay, so, but this is interesting though,

00:58:25.680 --> 00:58:27.560
 because now we're on a slide.

00:58:27.560 --> 00:58:31.400
 Does anyone have any questions or anything in regards to this particular slide?

00:58:31.400 --> 00:58:35.600
 I do want to say something in this regard.

00:58:35.600 --> 00:58:43.200
 I think that they may have picked these areas

00:58:43.200 --> 00:58:48.520
 because of the high, it looks like that Bolivar,

00:58:49.560 --> 00:58:57.360
 I traveled down that road and it could be a very contagious road with all the cars.

00:58:57.360 --> 00:58:59.440
 Park there in some, you can't park on some side.

00:58:59.440 --> 00:59:01.720
 There's all kinds of stuff going on on that road.

00:59:01.720 --> 00:59:06.840
 But that's from what I'm gathering and just looking at the ones.

00:59:06.840 --> 00:59:11.560
 It could have been any road because I'm thinking about some other roads that I

00:59:11.560 --> 00:59:15.840
 would prefer you go, but if you all have deemed these the ones that we just kind of

00:59:15.840 --> 00:59:19.880
 need to work on first, then I'm okay with that.

00:59:19.880 --> 00:59:21.840
 You're not fighting that?

00:59:21.840 --> 00:59:22.880
 Anybody else fighting that?

00:59:22.880 --> 00:59:23.880
 Anybody else fighting that?

00:59:23.880 --> 00:59:26.840
 Okay, so any other questions on this slide?

00:59:26.840 --> 00:59:27.720
 Yes.

00:59:27.720 --> 00:59:30.240
 >> Yeah, I just wanted to say, obviously, I have my favorites.

00:59:30.240 --> 00:59:32.960
 I have the roads that I rely on and travel on a lot by bike.

00:59:32.960 --> 00:59:36.640
 This is not the roads that I would have picked, but

00:59:36.640 --> 00:59:38.720
 that's why I'm glad you're going through the data and

00:59:38.720 --> 00:59:42.200
 really taking a hard analytical approach to this, so appreciate that.

00:59:42.200 --> 00:59:46.960
 >> Okay, all right, so did you have anything else?

00:59:46.960 --> 00:59:48.120
 >> Slide five.

00:59:48.120 --> 00:59:49.360
 >> All right, let's go to slide five.

00:59:49.360 --> 00:59:58.160
 >> So on the ball of our corridor, and it's good because we can segue from chairs

00:59:58.160 --> 01:00:02.640
 comments, I'm excited about the concept for

01:00:02.640 --> 01:00:07.600
 the northern changes and how they'll impact.

01:00:07.600 --> 01:00:12.960
 And I know that most of the impacts

01:00:12.960 --> 01:00:17.560
 are going to be in the segment in between the two changes.

01:00:17.560 --> 01:00:26.040
 Do we anticipate though any improvements along the major university arterial or not?

01:00:26.040 --> 01:00:29.160
 >> No, that was not included in the cost.

01:00:29.160 --> 01:00:33.400
 >> And not in building them there, I think I understood that.

01:00:33.400 --> 01:00:39.840
 But do you think by having less drive through, less flow, or safer flow,

01:00:39.840 --> 01:00:44.240
 that there will be some sort of knock on effects on university or not?

01:00:44.240 --> 01:00:48.000
 >> By definition, if there's less cut through traffic, yeah.

01:00:48.000 --> 01:00:50.880
 >> Okay, that's all I have on this one.

01:00:50.880 --> 01:00:52.400
 >> All right, anybody else?

01:00:52.400 --> 01:00:54.280
 Yes, Suzy?

01:00:54.280 --> 01:00:59.280
 >> So I do use this road a lot and I've talked to folks who live on Bolivar and

01:00:59.280 --> 01:01:03.480
 I know a lot of cut through traffic does fly down this street fairly often.

01:01:03.480 --> 01:01:06.640
 And out of any street in the entire city of Denton,

01:01:06.640 --> 01:01:11.480
 this seems like one of the most obvious to try out some of these Greenway

01:01:11.480 --> 01:01:13.800
 Bike Boulevard type of stuff.

01:01:13.800 --> 01:01:18.160
 What I like about this type of thing is that you don't have to put in a bike lane

01:01:18.160 --> 01:01:20.520
 and you're not taking away a bunch of parking.

01:01:20.520 --> 01:01:25.080
 You're just changing sort of the situation of the road so that car and

01:01:25.080 --> 01:01:29.880
 bike traffic can share more safely and with less conflict.

01:01:29.880 --> 01:01:34.400
 I guess I would definitely encourage on the one way idea of only letting traffic

01:01:34.400 --> 01:01:40.000
 go one way that if the neighborhood is okay with trying that out, right?

01:01:40.000 --> 01:01:45.960
 As a pilot project that we definitely use very temporary measures for that.

01:01:45.960 --> 01:01:49.080
 What I picture is people just going the wrong way anyway, right?

01:01:49.080 --> 01:01:50.660
 Cuz they do it on our one way streets.

01:01:50.660 --> 01:01:54.600
 But if the neighbors are open to just trying it out as a pilot and

01:01:54.600 --> 01:01:58.680
 just seeing how it goes, I would like to see us try it and

01:01:58.680 --> 01:02:01.040
 see if it works and see if I'm wrong for sure.

01:02:01.040 --> 01:02:05.240
 But I'm very excited about this project specifically and

01:02:05.240 --> 01:02:07.360
 working with the neighbors to figure out.

01:02:07.360 --> 01:02:10.000
 I mean, I'm sure they'd love to have less traffic on their street.

01:02:10.000 --> 01:02:13.400
 And there's Carol right next to it, so that's all I have.

01:02:13.400 --> 01:02:19.160
 >> All right, yes?

01:02:19.160 --> 01:02:21.680
 >> Yeah, just a few remarks.

01:02:21.680 --> 01:02:26.080
 Number one, not much of anything, but if you're gonna do similar maps in the future

01:02:26.080 --> 01:02:30.560
 where it's not north that's up, if I could just, not this map, but

01:02:30.560 --> 01:02:32.440
 the two other maps kinda threw me for a minute.

01:02:32.440 --> 01:02:34.920
 If I could just get a north arrow on those in the future.

01:02:34.920 --> 01:02:37.920
 >> It's a direction left.

01:02:37.920 --> 01:02:39.120
 >> I would appreciate that.

01:02:39.120 --> 01:02:39.640
 >> Okay.

01:02:39.640 --> 01:02:44.600
 >> But yeah, I really like this, it's very efficient, it's very cost effective.

01:02:44.600 --> 01:02:47.680
 Like I said earlier, we could do ten plus of these for

01:02:47.680 --> 01:02:51.400
 the cost of that one DCTA A train trail project.

01:02:51.400 --> 01:02:55.000
 And we do have a lot of streets where they're neighborhood streets,

01:02:55.000 --> 01:02:58.440
 they are connective, but they're very underutilized just cuz there's a Carol or

01:02:58.440 --> 01:03:01.080
 there's a 380 kind of running right next to them.

01:03:01.080 --> 01:03:04.840
 And I think obviously folks don't want a lot of speeding car traffic on their

01:03:04.840 --> 01:03:08.640
 streets, but if we can get more foot or bike traffic on there and

01:03:08.640 --> 01:03:13.240
 get more use out of these very expensive assets that the city has, I think that's great.

01:03:15.000 --> 01:03:22.280
 And then my final comment here would be Austin passed a $400 million bond for this.

01:03:22.280 --> 01:03:26.040
 Obviously they're a much larger city, but they passed a $400 million bond for

01:03:26.040 --> 01:03:27.000
 these types of projects.

01:03:27.000 --> 01:03:30.360
 If we could get, we've talked about wanting to see more funding for this.

01:03:30.360 --> 01:03:35.200
 If maybe we could consider 20, 30, $40 million for this on a future bond,

01:03:35.200 --> 01:03:37.160
 see if the committee likes that, I think that would be great.

01:03:37.160 --> 01:03:41.880
 >> Well, I see them writing notes, look at that.

01:03:41.880 --> 01:03:46.160
 >> [LAUGH] >> The person that would be writing notes.

01:03:46.160 --> 01:03:46.960
 >> Let me touch on that.

01:03:46.960 --> 01:03:47.760
 >> Yes, sir.

01:03:47.760 --> 01:03:52.680
 >> On that slide, and this is really off the topic, but

01:03:52.680 --> 01:04:00.680
 I wonder if a left turn could be eliminated from Bolivar on to university.

01:04:00.680 --> 01:04:01.800
 >> That's a good idea.

01:04:01.800 --> 01:04:05.840
 >> East northbound turning westbound on university.

01:04:05.840 --> 01:04:07.040
 >> That's hard.

01:04:07.040 --> 01:04:12.480
 >> I've seen many, many times people get in that no man's land.

01:04:12.480 --> 01:04:17.920
 And blocking everything because they can't get a clear place.

01:04:17.920 --> 01:04:23.400
 I think that'd be a good place to put a, or at least at certain hours of the day.

01:04:23.400 --> 01:04:26.800
 But I think that'd be helpful.

01:04:26.800 --> 01:04:28.040
 Please consider that.

01:04:28.040 --> 01:04:31.320
 >> That would be very helpful, and I've gotten stuck in the middle of that thing.

01:04:31.320 --> 01:04:32.880
 >> Don't go left, don't go left.

01:04:32.880 --> 01:04:34.240
 >> [LAUGH]

01:04:34.240 --> 01:04:35.360
 >> So you're the guy.

01:04:35.360 --> 01:04:36.960
 >> Personal experience.

01:04:36.960 --> 01:04:38.560
 >> I take sunrise over to Carol's.

01:04:38.560 --> 01:04:41.640
 >> [LAUGH] I'm like, yeah, true.

01:04:41.640 --> 01:04:43.360
 Is that what you have, that's it?

01:04:43.360 --> 01:04:45.400
 >> That's not all I have, that's all I had on that.

01:04:45.400 --> 01:04:47.520
 >> Okay, on that, okay, anyone else?

01:04:47.520 --> 01:04:48.680
 I think that's it for this slide.

01:04:48.680 --> 01:04:51.320
 Anybody else have anything for any other slide?

01:04:51.320 --> 01:04:52.160
 Yes, sir.

01:04:52.160 --> 01:04:53.280
 >> Can I have slide seven?

01:04:53.280 --> 01:05:01.520
 There we go, and it also relates to the Sycamore, but we can stay on this one.

01:05:01.520 --> 01:05:04.720
 So it only goes because of the prior discussion that we just had on the trip

01:05:04.720 --> 01:05:09.040
 funding, some of the Sycamore and Fry overlap.

01:05:09.040 --> 01:05:15.600
 And so we're going to spend the money, and I guess what I'm asking about,

01:05:15.600 --> 01:05:21.920
 is there a way that we can get synergy to not have two projects a year apart

01:05:21.920 --> 01:05:29.200
 kind of thing and get the synergy to happen at the same time without delaying

01:05:29.200 --> 01:05:32.240
 the trip funding project because that money is encumbered and ready to go and

01:05:32.240 --> 01:05:33.680
 we should do stuff with it.

01:05:33.680 --> 01:05:36.720
 Is there a way we can get these synergized?

01:05:36.720 --> 01:05:40.080
 Because if you're talking about lane, I think this one was lane separators.

01:05:40.080 --> 01:05:41.560
 What is it?

01:05:41.560 --> 01:05:44.280
 I don't remember the augmentation.

01:05:44.280 --> 01:05:48.240
 >> There's, the concept is more fluid and for this project.

01:05:48.240 --> 01:05:53.320
 >> Okay, okay, so especially in a situation like that where we had the fluid

01:05:53.320 --> 01:05:58.200
 concepts, if there's an opportunity to get those engineering standards happen at

01:05:58.200 --> 01:06:02.920
 the same time so we can be tearing out those segments on Ferry Street, was it?

01:06:02.920 --> 01:06:09.160
 >> Less often, I don't want to go there and then come back in a year and a half.

01:06:09.160 --> 01:06:12.320
 We get endless complaints about when that happens.

01:06:12.320 --> 01:06:13.360
 >> Right.

01:06:13.360 --> 01:06:17.800
 >> Even if what eventually comes is great and we budgeted and

01:06:17.800 --> 01:06:24.840
 did financing efficiently and well, just the mere fact that we kept it torn up for

01:06:24.840 --> 01:06:28.200
 repeatedly is something I'm trying to avoid here.

01:06:28.200 --> 01:06:29.200
 >> We would love that as well.

01:06:29.200 --> 01:06:32.200
 >> That's all my questions on this one.

01:06:33.680 --> 01:06:37.560
 >> Okay, I don't have any questions on this one.

01:06:37.560 --> 01:06:39.680
 Does anybody else have any questions on this?

01:06:39.680 --> 01:06:45.080
 Okay, did you have anything additional that you wanted to speak about on this?

01:06:45.080 --> 01:06:47.200
 Any additional slides you all want to look at?

01:06:47.200 --> 01:06:47.760
 >> I do.

01:06:47.760 --> 01:06:50.160
 >> Okay, let's take a- >> Slide four, please.

01:06:50.160 --> 01:06:59.920
 I like narrow spot one, I like narrow spot two a lot.

01:06:59.920 --> 01:07:02.200
 I like the bump out, what is it?

01:07:03.240 --> 01:07:03.760
 >> Bulb out?

01:07:03.760 --> 01:07:06.680
 >> Bulb out, bulb out, and the stripe.

01:07:06.680 --> 01:07:15.680
 The chicane scares me, the courtesy spot and the half closure really scares me.

01:07:15.680 --> 01:07:21.280
 I can see people driving right over the curb.

01:07:21.280 --> 01:07:27.680
 In fact, we used to see that where Hickory crossed Carroll Boulevard,

01:07:27.680 --> 01:07:33.480
 right in front of the Carroll Building, where there was a, I got a fan over here.

01:07:33.480 --> 01:07:35.760
 Give me that card back.

01:07:35.760 --> 01:07:43.480
 People would jump right over the curb despite there being a curb there.

01:07:43.480 --> 01:07:50.960
 I don't care for those two at all, I just think they're very scary, thank you.

01:07:50.960 --> 01:07:54.080
 >> So I guess you don't like the chicanery?

01:07:54.080 --> 01:07:56.840
 >> I don't like the chicanery, that's right, very nice.

01:07:56.840 --> 01:07:59.400
 >> The chicanery.

01:07:59.400 --> 01:08:05.760
 >> I'll take this time to speak on this, I'm with Joe.

01:08:05.760 --> 01:08:10.960
 But I was also thinking about, at the end of those streets where you have the bicycle

01:08:10.960 --> 01:08:15.240
 parking lots, remember where you can park in line on the bicycles?

01:08:15.240 --> 01:08:23.560
 And I don't even know where to begin to have a plan as to where those would be located.

01:08:23.560 --> 01:08:30.840
 Would that be something that would start kind of like downtown, in the downtown area, kind of experimenting with that or with that?

01:08:30.840 --> 01:08:33.440
 >> No, we didn't, my apologies.

01:08:33.440 --> 01:08:39.680
 >> I'm sorry, I was just going to say, how do you get to a point where you're making decisions on that?

01:08:39.680 --> 01:08:45.000
 >> Again, it will be subject to the public involvement, but in the costs,

01:08:45.000 --> 01:08:53.360
 in the initial costs, we did put in bike racks in the Fry District.

01:08:53.360 --> 01:08:55.200
 >> Okay, in the Fry District.

01:08:55.200 --> 01:08:59.440
 Would it be, it's some kind of expense to go ahead and

01:08:59.440 --> 01:09:05.360
 try that particular concept, other than bike racks?

01:09:05.360 --> 01:09:12.360
 I mean, using the street portion as part of the, do you all know what I'm talking about?

01:09:12.360 --> 01:09:16.800
 Where at the edge of the street, you don't go all the way to the end of the street,

01:09:16.800 --> 01:09:21.440
 you come back to the street and you leave spaces to park bikes with the protection.

01:09:21.440 --> 01:09:23.560
 >> Into a parking area for bikes.

01:09:23.560 --> 01:09:25.360
 >> Yeah. >> Daylighting.

01:09:25.360 --> 01:09:26.200
 >> What is it called?

01:09:26.200 --> 01:09:28.400
 >> Daylighting, but you put a bike rack in there.

01:09:28.400 --> 01:09:30.440
 >> You put a bike rack in there?

01:09:30.440 --> 01:09:32.080
 >> I think that's what you- >> That's what I'm talking about.

01:09:32.080 --> 01:09:33.600
 >> Yeah, that's what I thought you were talking about.

01:09:33.600 --> 01:09:37.160
 >> Is that all part of all this, part of the toolbox?

01:09:37.160 --> 01:09:38.400
 >> Yes. >> It sounds like it's separate.

01:09:38.400 --> 01:09:40.640
 >> It is. >> But it's part of the toolbox, okay.

01:09:40.640 --> 01:09:48.400
 I think that's all that I have, but one, two, that's it, one or two, I'll go with that.

01:09:48.400 --> 01:09:49.760
 Anybody else want to weigh in on that?

01:09:51.200 --> 01:09:53.640
 >> I just have one final question on this item.

01:09:53.640 --> 01:09:58.280
 So all of these proposals, we saw feasibility study,

01:09:58.280 --> 01:10:03.920
 I think, in fall 25 and possible implementation in spring 26.

01:10:03.920 --> 01:10:09.520
 Would the public input sort of be all one session together, all of the projects together?

01:10:09.520 --> 01:10:13.000
 Would they be split up amongst multiple input opportunities?

01:10:13.000 --> 01:10:14.400
 Do we not know that yet?

01:10:14.400 --> 01:10:15.240
 Is that too far ahead?

01:10:15.240 --> 01:10:20.320
 >> Well, it could be both.

01:10:20.320 --> 01:10:23.160
 >> Okay.

01:10:23.160 --> 01:10:27.000
 Undecided TBD, TBD.

01:10:27.000 --> 01:10:31.800
 >> Well, there's some questions that are really very neighborhood centric.

01:10:31.800 --> 01:10:33.920
 >> Yeah, yeah, thank you.

01:10:33.920 --> 01:10:38.600
 >> Good, okay, well, it sounds like we are done with this item here.

01:10:38.600 --> 01:10:41.000
 We're gonna, thank you very much.

01:10:41.000 --> 01:10:47.760
 We're gonna move on to item D, MC 25, there's 013, looking at our staff memorandums.

01:10:49.760 --> 01:10:51.480
 Who's gonna pull those up?

01:10:51.480 --> 01:10:53.360
 We have any questions?

01:10:53.360 --> 01:10:56.040
 Any comments or concerns on each one of these things quickly?

01:10:56.040 --> 01:10:58.360
 We can go through that.

01:10:58.360 --> 01:11:01.040
 And then I'll have to remember to look on the back.

01:11:01.040 --> 01:11:08.640
 Yes, so there's our randoms.

01:11:08.640 --> 01:11:12.440
 Anybody have anything on rerouting plan for South Bonnebury and Bush Creek?

01:11:12.440 --> 01:11:13.520
 Yes?

01:11:13.520 --> 01:11:19.040
 >> On the first one there, do you, can we pull up,

01:11:19.040 --> 01:11:24.640
 what is the exhibit, I forget, two, thank you.

01:11:24.640 --> 01:11:25.480
 Perfect, thank you.

01:11:25.480 --> 01:11:31.000
 This isn't, I just don't remember the old alignment for

01:11:31.000 --> 01:11:32.440
 when we approved the neighborhood.

01:11:32.440 --> 01:11:40.520
 This roadway is the current planned roadway for leading up into there, right?

01:11:40.520 --> 01:11:44.000
 We're not pulling, we're not moving this and

01:11:44.000 --> 01:11:48.800
 pulling into the riparian areas or the drainages or anything.

01:11:48.800 --> 01:11:51.680
 This is the current plan, correct?

01:11:51.680 --> 01:11:55.080
 >> Good morning, this is Chandra, transportation services.

01:11:55.080 --> 01:12:01.600
 This is just the concepts we are submitting for UPRR for crossing at 377.

01:12:01.600 --> 01:12:06.240
 So these are just concepts with us and the land has been dedicated by this sage

01:12:06.240 --> 01:12:10.320
 brush development back in 2020, 2021.

01:12:10.320 --> 01:12:14.400
 Within the right of way we are sketched it, so this is nothing final.

01:12:16.360 --> 01:12:19.200
 >> All right, so I guess when I'm asking, let me state it a different way.

01:12:19.200 --> 01:12:23.360
 I thought in the original sage brush plan that there was a road here.

01:12:23.360 --> 01:12:26.040
 There's not, this is an add-on?

01:12:26.040 --> 01:12:27.320
 >> This is the roadway.

01:12:27.320 --> 01:12:34.040
 So they had built up to this point where the Oakleaf Trail ends.

01:12:34.040 --> 01:12:37.800
 So we are picking up from the right of way they already dedicated to the city.

01:12:37.800 --> 01:12:42.360
 >> For the roadway.

01:12:42.360 --> 01:12:48.120
 >> The question I'm asking is are we sacrificing,

01:12:48.120 --> 01:12:55.120
 are we sacrificing green space retention in order to get roadway for this?

01:12:55.120 --> 01:12:55.720
 >> No.

01:12:55.720 --> 01:12:58.360
 >> Okay, that's that question.

01:12:58.360 --> 01:13:04.720
 And as part of the larger on this bonnie bray with the loop around and

01:13:04.720 --> 01:13:11.000
 where we're closing down the one intersection, I know we will do a TIA.

01:13:11.000 --> 01:13:12.640
 That's perfect, thank you.

01:13:12.640 --> 01:13:17.520
 I know we will do TIAs as we have development.

01:13:17.520 --> 01:13:22.240
 But do we have a predicted model impacts already?

01:13:22.240 --> 01:13:24.240
 Cuz we already know these intersections.

01:13:24.240 --> 01:13:25.720
 And we already know the traffic flows.

01:13:25.720 --> 01:13:31.360
 And we can anticipate this segment moving to that segment in terms of flows.

01:13:31.360 --> 01:13:38.280
 Do we already have predictions and models on these revised hypothetical TIAs?

01:13:38.280 --> 01:13:43.040
 >> We didn't have the revised ones, but we have the numbers from 2020,

01:13:43.040 --> 01:13:47.000
 2021 based on the data from 2018 and 2019.

01:13:47.000 --> 01:13:53.240
 And we believe it's only 17 and 34 during the peak hours.

01:13:53.240 --> 01:13:55.240
 And daily trips are around 100.

01:13:55.240 --> 01:13:57.240
 So- >> Look at this right here.

01:13:57.240 --> 01:13:58.240
 >> Yes.

01:13:58.240 --> 01:14:02.120
 >> Okay, all right, thank you.

01:14:02.120 --> 01:14:03.480
 That's all I have on this one, ma'am.

01:14:03.480 --> 01:14:05.160
 >> Thank you.

01:14:05.160 --> 01:14:07.320
 Anybody else have, yes, we have one more person.

01:14:07.320 --> 01:14:08.200
 >> Chandra, come back.

01:14:08.200 --> 01:14:10.760
 >> [INAUDIBLE]

01:14:10.760 --> 01:14:14.680
 >> Just for the purposes of the audience and the future recording of this meeting.

01:14:14.680 --> 01:14:15.200
 >> Sure.

01:14:15.200 --> 01:14:17.480
 >> Why are we closing, so I already know the answer.

01:14:17.480 --> 01:14:21.880
 But why are we closing two crossings while we're creating a new one?

01:14:21.880 --> 01:14:22.920
 Just for review.

01:14:22.920 --> 01:14:29.520
 >> So as such, as you can see from the crossing, it's at a skewed angle.

01:14:29.520 --> 01:14:31.720
 And it's already unsafe.

01:14:31.720 --> 01:14:34.720
 And to have a new crossing to be in place,

01:14:34.720 --> 01:14:40.040
 UPRR has a rule of you have to close two crossings to get a new crossing.

01:14:40.040 --> 01:14:45.920
 And this crossing is on our mobility plan with the Hickory Creek Brush Creek.

01:14:45.920 --> 01:14:50.760
 That's a primary arterial to meet UPRR's criteria for two to one.

01:14:50.760 --> 01:14:57.440
 So we have to close those unsafe ones, which really carries very low volume.

01:14:57.440 --> 01:15:01.000
 And this will be our primary corridor in the future.

01:15:01.000 --> 01:15:01.840
 >> All right, thank you.

01:15:01.840 --> 01:15:02.340
 >> Sure.

01:15:05.520 --> 01:15:06.800
 >> Yes, we have one more question.

01:15:06.800 --> 01:15:08.760
 >> Before you leave.

01:15:08.760 --> 01:15:13.240
 The green line that runs more or less parallel to Brush Creek,

01:15:13.240 --> 01:15:18.120
 is that the delineation between Argyle and City of Denton?

01:15:18.120 --> 01:15:22.840
 >> No, I don't think so.

01:15:22.840 --> 01:15:26.360
 Even the southern side is still City of Denton.

01:15:26.360 --> 01:15:28.320
 >> Okay, what does that green line represent?

01:15:28.320 --> 01:15:31.320
 >> It's the right of your lines, the property boundaries.

01:15:31.320 --> 01:15:33.760
 >> I see, okay, thank you.

01:15:33.760 --> 01:15:38.740
 >> And how does Brush Creek cross 377 at that intersection?

01:15:38.740 --> 01:15:43.720
 >> It will be an at grade crossing with the quad gates, with the UPRR gates,

01:15:43.720 --> 01:15:48.400
 that does a complete closure at right at 377.

01:15:48.400 --> 01:15:50.400
 And this will be signalized.

01:15:50.400 --> 01:15:52.600
 >> Similar to Vintage?

01:15:52.600 --> 01:15:53.640
 >> Yes.

01:15:53.640 --> 01:15:54.240
 >> Okay.

01:15:54.240 --> 01:15:56.040
 >> With preemption and quiet zones.

01:15:56.040 --> 01:15:58.120
 >> Okay, okay, thank you.

01:15:58.120 --> 01:16:01.200
 >> Oh, they get their quiet zone.

01:16:01.200 --> 01:16:10.080
 >> Okay, thank you, traffic control for pedestrians and cyclists in construction areas.

01:16:10.080 --> 01:16:12.960
 Anybody have any questions or concerns about that?

01:16:12.960 --> 01:16:16.220
 Okay, we have one.

01:16:16.220 --> 01:16:20.000
 >> I'm still running into, there will be contractors doing some work

01:16:20.000 --> 01:16:22.160
 and they put the signs completely blocking the sidewalk

01:16:22.160 --> 01:16:24.040
 when there's perfectly good spaces for them to put them.

01:16:24.040 --> 01:16:26.840
 Otherwise, I'll report it when I see it, but just wanted to note that.

01:16:26.840 --> 01:16:27.680
 >> No, I appreciate it.

01:16:27.680 --> 01:16:30.840
 And we've been working with our public works inspectors to get on those contractors

01:16:30.840 --> 01:16:32.920
 to make sure we're keeping the sidewalks clear.

01:16:32.920 --> 01:16:33.920
 So, thank you.

01:16:33.920 --> 01:16:34.800
 >> Thank you.

01:16:34.800 --> 01:16:39.040
 Total lane miles completed in FY 2024.

01:16:39.040 --> 01:16:41.680
 Anybody have any questions on that?

01:16:41.680 --> 01:16:42.960
 Yes, Suzy?

01:16:42.960 --> 01:16:44.320
 >> Seth, I'm sorry to put you on the spot.

01:16:44.320 --> 01:16:48.280
 Do you remember ballpark, how many lane miles of roadway the city has?

01:16:48.280 --> 01:16:49.360
 Is it 1534?

01:16:49.360 --> 01:16:51.840
 Am I making that up?

01:16:51.840 --> 01:16:53.500
 1534, thereabouts?

01:16:53.500 --> 01:16:57.120
 Okay, so 1534, how long do streets last?

01:16:57.120 --> 01:16:59.480
 An asphalt street, give me a range.

01:16:59.480 --> 01:17:02.760
 >> So, it depends on the design criteria, but generally

01:17:02.760 --> 01:17:05.760
 between 25 and 40 years is the design life.

01:17:05.760 --> 01:17:07.320
 >> 25 and 40 years, okay.

01:17:07.320 --> 01:17:15.240
 And so, we just did, okay, so based on having about 1534 lane miles of roadway.

01:17:15.240 --> 01:17:19.480
 And last year, we reconstructed 22 and a half miles of roadway.

01:17:19.480 --> 01:17:26.080
 And streets last 25 to 40, asphalt streets last 25 to 40 years more or less.

01:17:26.080 --> 01:17:32.800
 So, at that rate, we are reconstructing our streets every 68 years.

01:17:32.800 --> 01:17:41.240
 >> Well, I will say that we could do that quicker if we can tax the taxpayers

01:17:41.240 --> 01:17:42.960
 to put some more funding towards it.

01:17:42.960 --> 01:17:48.120
 And, you know, just another, Madam Cassie,

01:17:48.120 --> 01:17:53.080
 we would probably need another one whole penny so we can hire some people

01:17:53.080 --> 01:17:54.200
 and get some contracts going.

01:17:54.200 --> 01:17:57.720
 >> So, there's lots of different ways to get there to get that funding and figure

01:17:57.720 --> 01:18:01.320
 out how to make that work, but I just want to emphasize that, you know, we're--

01:18:01.320 --> 01:18:02.080
 >> Okay, we tell the people.

01:18:02.080 --> 01:18:05.600
 >> And I know it's largely a funding problem.

01:18:05.600 --> 01:18:08.920
 Like if we had all the money, it would be a lot easier to keep up.

01:18:08.920 --> 01:18:14.840
 But I just kind of wanted to emphasize that point that we are underfunding the street.

01:18:14.840 --> 01:18:16.320
 >> Okay, we're underfunding.

01:18:16.320 --> 01:18:19.120
 >> Well, Dana Kramer, Deputy Director of Operations.

01:18:19.120 --> 01:18:21.920
 I just want to add, while pulling the data,

01:18:21.920 --> 01:18:25.320
 that was just the last year, '23, '24.

01:18:25.320 --> 01:18:25.800
 >> Yeah.

01:18:25.800 --> 01:18:31.760
 >> '22, '23, capital by itself did 39.7 lane miles at that time.

01:18:31.760 --> 01:18:36.080
 So, it's all on how the roads are-- when the projects are closed and when they're completed.

01:18:36.080 --> 01:18:40.840
 So, we do-- you are right, there are a lot of roads.

01:18:40.840 --> 01:18:43.880
 We're not on the exact timeframe, but we are looking at different funding options

01:18:43.880 --> 01:18:44.960
 on how we can do that.

01:18:44.960 --> 01:18:46.800
 >> I appreciate the clarification too.

01:18:46.800 --> 01:18:47.360
 >> Thank you.

01:18:47.360 --> 01:18:50.280
 Thank you for coming and saving me, saving my words.

01:18:50.280 --> 01:18:52.200
 [ Laughter ]

01:18:52.200 --> 01:18:53.680
 >> They are working people.

01:18:53.680 --> 01:18:58.720
 >> Can I just follow up here and ask, was that lane miles reconstructed

01:18:58.720 --> 01:19:04.360
 or lane miles reconstructed and lane miles and overlaid combined?

01:19:04.360 --> 01:19:07.880
 >> That was just reconstructed.

01:19:07.880 --> 01:19:08.280
 >> Okay, thank you.

01:19:08.280 --> 01:19:11.040
 >> So, we kept it consistent across that.

01:19:11.040 --> 01:19:12.640
 >> Okay, thank you.

01:19:12.640 --> 01:19:16.160
 We'll move on to quarterly transportation services report.

01:19:16.160 --> 01:19:24.720
 Does anybody have any questions on quality transportation services report?

01:19:24.720 --> 01:19:27.160
 >> I do, but it's 180 pages.

01:19:27.160 --> 01:19:29.200
 I'm going to honestly have to come back.

01:19:29.200 --> 01:19:30.120
 >> Okay, come back.

01:19:30.120 --> 01:19:33.600
 You can meet with-- you can meet separately.

01:19:33.600 --> 01:19:35.600
 Yeah, you can meet separately, yes.

01:19:35.600 --> 01:19:36.560
 Quiet Zone--

01:19:36.560 --> 01:19:39.640
 >> Can't just praise them for having 180 pages of data.

01:19:39.640 --> 01:19:40.600
 I'm excited.

01:19:40.600 --> 01:19:45.840
 >> Oh, ooh, data, data.

01:19:45.840 --> 01:19:51.040
 Quiet Zone realignment for Mingo and Rudele.

01:19:51.040 --> 01:19:52.640
 Oh, I'm very excited about this.

01:19:52.640 --> 01:19:57.600
 I do understand that there's been some work on some of the--

01:19:57.600 --> 01:20:01.080
 some of the design work is starting to happen, some planning.

01:20:01.080 --> 01:20:02.960
 I saw some people out there--

01:20:02.960 --> 01:20:03.240
 >> Yes.

01:20:03.240 --> 01:20:04.840
 >> Mealing around.

01:20:04.840 --> 01:20:06.640
 So, I'm very excited about that.

01:20:06.640 --> 01:20:10.560
 I do know that there's another little neighborhood situation getting ready to come

01:20:10.560 --> 01:20:15.920
 up through their way, maybe some apartments that's being planned for.

01:20:15.920 --> 01:20:17.440
 I'm not sure what the neighborhood is going to say.

01:20:17.440 --> 01:20:21.800
 But any case, that's pretty interesting to me.

01:20:21.800 --> 01:20:23.960
 My favorite one right now.

01:20:23.960 --> 01:20:26.400
 Yes, it's my favorite one.

01:20:26.400 --> 01:20:32.640
 >> Can staff take a stab for the next meeting at addressing some

01:20:32.640 --> 01:20:37.560
 of the concerns we heard from the public speaking about this alignment

01:20:37.560 --> 01:20:41.280
 and these kinds of things just so that we have some response?

01:20:41.280 --> 01:20:41.800
 >> Yes, sir.

01:20:41.800 --> 01:20:42.560
 We can do that.

01:20:42.560 --> 01:20:43.120
 >> Thank you.

01:20:43.120 --> 01:20:44.560
 Anybody else on this?

01:20:44.560 --> 01:20:45.320
 All right, great.

01:20:45.320 --> 01:20:46.960
 So, we can look forward to that.

01:20:46.960 --> 01:20:48.040
 Very important.

01:20:48.040 --> 01:20:52.520
 Unallocating-- unallocated bike fund usage.

01:20:52.520 --> 01:20:54.440
 Did we touch on that a little bit already?

01:20:54.440 --> 01:20:56.480
 >> I don't know if we did or not.

01:20:56.480 --> 01:20:58.280
 But I think Farhan can if you have--

01:20:58.280 --> 01:21:00.960
 >> We were talking about the bike line and extra money that was left over to--

01:21:00.960 --> 01:21:01.720
 was that different?

01:21:01.720 --> 01:21:02.160
 >> Yes.

01:21:02.160 --> 01:21:03.560
 >> Okay.

01:21:08.320 --> 01:21:15.440
 >> So, the unallocated bike lane funds were the funds that were dedicated for bike lanes.

01:21:15.440 --> 01:21:19.040
 But while we started implementing some of the projects,

01:21:19.040 --> 01:21:23.680
 we've realized that when it comes to bike lanes, they are not simply bike lanes.

01:21:23.680 --> 01:21:30.600
 They interfere with many traffic operations related or traffic or roadway related items.

01:21:30.600 --> 01:21:40.440
 And so, in order to address that issue, we are requesting that we include all those items as a concept bike lane implementation.

01:21:40.440 --> 01:21:46.880
 Otherwise, it's simply, in a simple statement,

01:21:46.880 --> 01:21:53.280
 yes, it is addressing bike lanes, but then in details, it would be looking into safety,

01:21:53.280 --> 01:21:59.480
 many, many other uses that would be interfering with those.

01:21:59.480 --> 01:22:00.960
 >> Thank you for clearing that up.

01:22:00.960 --> 01:22:03.320
 That was a nice clarification of what that was.

01:22:03.320 --> 01:22:04.240
 Yes, ma'am.

01:22:04.240 --> 01:22:07.200
 >> And on the note of unallocated bike fund usage, I mean,

01:22:07.200 --> 01:22:10.160
 we've had a lot of staff turnover during the time I've been paying attention.

01:22:10.160 --> 01:22:15.720
 And the allocation annually is 200,000 on the-- in the budget?

01:22:15.720 --> 01:22:17.160
 >> I'll have to confirm, but I think it's 200,000.

01:22:17.160 --> 01:22:18.160
 >> Yes, that is correct.

01:22:18.160 --> 01:22:18.520
 >> Okay.

01:22:18.520 --> 01:22:19.400
 >> 200,000.

01:22:19.400 --> 01:22:20.600
 >> Thank you.

01:22:20.600 --> 01:22:24.360
 So, my understanding is part of the reason we haven't spent it is one,

01:22:24.360 --> 01:22:28.040
 sometimes new people are onboarded and they don't even know about it.

01:22:28.040 --> 01:22:29.520
 I think that's kind of happened.

01:22:29.520 --> 01:22:33.920
 But also, there's not-- I haven't seen much of a plan of spending it,

01:22:33.920 --> 01:22:36.320
 you know, where those dollars are going to go each year.

01:22:36.320 --> 01:22:41.040
 So, my question is, are we still kind of working on a--

01:22:41.040 --> 01:22:47.680
 some sort of a plan, an implementation plan to help guide future spending and targeting of bike

01:22:47.680 --> 01:22:50.680
 and pedestrian infrastructure so that we kind of have a plan

01:22:50.680 --> 01:22:53.400
 for how to spend the funds moving forward?

01:22:53.400 --> 01:22:53.960
 >> That is correct.

01:22:53.960 --> 01:23:03.920
 We are working on a plan and in the Q4 report, we added around a list of 20 prioritized projects and 15 or 20.

01:23:03.920 --> 01:23:08.800
 And then, I think we will pick the top four or five projects and

01:23:08.800 --> 01:23:14.160
 start allocating, you know, funding to those projects.

01:23:14.160 --> 01:23:18.800
 This last year, we tried to develop the process, prioritization process,

01:23:18.800 --> 01:23:25.640
 looking into how we will address the various factors associated with the bike lane prioritization.

01:23:25.640 --> 01:23:30.440
 And now, we are at a stage where we have draft list of projects and we just have to look into--

01:23:30.440 --> 01:23:33.760
 we are looking into the cost side of things now.

01:23:33.760 --> 01:23:34.400
 >> Okay.

01:23:34.400 --> 01:23:39.560
 At some point, will we be releasing to the public sort of the criteria that's being used?

01:23:39.560 --> 01:23:42.800
 So, there's just sort of transparency and, well, how did they select these projects?

01:23:42.800 --> 01:23:45.400
 Because you know those questions are going to come up at some point.

01:23:45.400 --> 01:23:45.960
 >> Yes.

01:23:45.960 --> 01:23:46.680
 >> Okay.

01:23:46.680 --> 01:23:48.440
 >> Thank you.

01:23:48.440 --> 01:23:53.120
 >> Let's talk about-- speaking of the next thing, upcoming public meetings.

01:23:53.120 --> 01:23:56.040
 Let us know what's going on with the next public meetings.

01:23:56.040 --> 01:23:59.040
 We see those dates there.

01:23:59.040 --> 01:23:59.600
 >> Yes, ma'am.

01:23:59.600 --> 01:24:04.520
 So, it looks like March 25th, 26th, we've got some reclassification meetings.

01:24:04.520 --> 01:24:07.440
 And then, April 3rd is going to be the neighborhood 1B.

01:24:07.440 --> 01:24:10.680
 So, that was a recent CMAR that was just approved.

01:24:10.680 --> 01:24:17.480
 Roughly $30 million up around the Stewart-Sherman-Windsor kind of area.

01:24:17.480 --> 01:24:20.320
 That's associated with the 2019 bond program.

01:24:20.320 --> 01:24:24.120
 So, that will be the pre-construction kickoff meeting, neighborhood meeting there.

01:24:24.120 --> 01:24:28.760
 >> What does reclassification mean when something is reclassified?

01:24:28.760 --> 01:24:29.080
 What is that?

01:24:29.080 --> 01:24:30.400
 >> I'll give you back to Paul.

01:24:30.400 --> 01:24:37.800
 >> Does it go from a boulevard to an avenue or a street to a highway or--

01:24:37.800 --> 01:24:40.160
 what does reclassification mean?

01:24:40.160 --> 01:24:42.720
 Look at him doing the shuffle around back over there.

01:24:42.720 --> 01:24:43.800
 >> I don't want to answer your question.

01:24:43.800 --> 01:24:45.000
 >> Yeah.

01:24:45.000 --> 01:24:47.200
 >> Chandra, Transportation Services.

01:24:47.200 --> 01:24:51.720
 >> So, we have Eagle Road currently with the 2022 mobility plan.

01:24:51.720 --> 01:24:54.040
 It was upgraded as a secondary arterial.

01:24:54.040 --> 01:24:54.680
 >> Oh, okay.

01:24:54.680 --> 01:25:03.160
 >> So, we are retaining it to be a collector to keep the existing characteristics

01:25:03.160 --> 01:25:05.960
 of the streets like speeds and safety.

01:25:05.960 --> 01:25:10.960
 If you do a secondary arterial, what it does is like it increases the speeds

01:25:10.960 --> 01:25:13.720
 with four lanes and some turn lanes.

01:25:13.720 --> 01:25:18.480
 So, we are trying to retain it so that's the reclassification that already was.

01:25:18.480 --> 01:25:24.080
 So, we can effectively manage because the characteristics around UNT are at lower speeds

01:25:24.080 --> 01:25:27.960
 with most of the streets are 20 miles per hour and some are 30.

01:25:27.960 --> 01:25:28.280
 >> Yeah.

01:25:28.280 --> 01:25:33.760
 >> But if you go to secondary arterial, the speeds will be at 35 to 40 miles per hour.

01:25:33.760 --> 01:25:34.480
 >> Thank you.

01:25:34.480 --> 01:25:35.600
 Thank you for the education.

01:25:35.600 --> 01:25:36.640
 >> Sure. Thank you.

01:25:36.640 --> 01:25:39.080
 >> All right.

01:25:39.080 --> 01:25:43.880
 We do have some attachments here but we're looking at time

01:25:43.880 --> 01:25:46.360
 because I know we've got to wrap this up.

01:25:46.360 --> 01:25:48.360
 >> Yes, and I believe we went through most of them.

01:25:48.360 --> 01:25:50.960
 >> Yeah, I think that the one that I do want to see--

01:25:50.960 --> 01:25:56.320
 no, go back to the attachments, the Exhibit 5.

01:25:56.320 --> 01:25:59.360
 Was it something-- did you all see an Exhibit 5?

01:25:59.360 --> 01:26:00.720
 Let me look at that.

01:26:00.720 --> 01:26:02.240
 >> That's Roodell.

01:26:02.240 --> 01:26:04.320
 >> Yep. So, this is the Roodell extension.

01:26:04.320 --> 01:26:05.120
 >> Yeah.

01:26:05.120 --> 01:26:07.480
 >> That comes across through the service center site

01:26:07.480 --> 01:26:11.840
 and then this piece is going plan north and then this is the continuation

01:26:11.840 --> 01:26:15.240
 at the bottom all the way up to US 380.

01:26:15.240 --> 01:26:17.760
 >> OK. That's what I wanted to see.

01:26:17.760 --> 01:26:18.480
 All right.

01:26:18.480 --> 01:26:19.840
 And just put that up there.

01:26:19.840 --> 01:26:20.280
 Thank you, sir.

01:26:20.280 --> 01:26:21.200
 That's all I needed.

01:26:21.200 --> 01:26:23.880
 Anybody else on that, anything?

01:26:23.880 --> 01:26:29.920
 OK. Let's move on to EMC 25-1014.

01:26:29.920 --> 01:26:31.320
 Receive report, hold a discussion

01:26:31.320 --> 01:26:35.840
 and give staff direction regarding future meeting topics.

01:26:35.840 --> 01:26:40.680
 Agenda information sheet, you got to guide us through this?

01:26:40.680 --> 01:26:41.480
 >> I sure can.

01:26:41.480 --> 01:26:45.240
 So, today you guys saw the 2025 trip proposal,

01:26:45.240 --> 01:26:47.280
 so we're proposing to remove that.

01:26:47.280 --> 01:26:48.240
 >> OK.

01:26:48.240 --> 01:26:51.160
 >> Item number 10 was the rerouting plan for South Ponti Bray.

01:26:51.160 --> 01:26:53.320
 So, we talked through that a little bit.

01:26:53.320 --> 01:26:55.680
 So, we're proposing to remove that.

01:26:55.680 --> 01:26:58.080
 The Quiet Zone realignment for Mingo Roodell is

01:26:58.080 --> 01:27:00.080
 that exhibit we just had up.

01:27:00.080 --> 01:27:03.480
 So, we're proposing to remove that as well.

01:27:03.480 --> 01:27:06.400
 Temporary traffic control for pedestrians and bicyclists

01:27:06.400 --> 01:27:08.760
 in construction zones, that was one of the exhibits

01:27:08.760 --> 01:27:10.520
 that we provided information on.

01:27:10.520 --> 01:27:12.120
 >> I have a hand that came up.

01:27:12.120 --> 01:27:12.640
 >> Yes, sir.

01:27:12.640 --> 01:27:14.760
 >> You-- I can ask it after he's done.

01:27:14.760 --> 01:27:14.960
 >> OK.

01:27:14.960 --> 01:27:15.720
 >> Oh, OK.

01:27:15.720 --> 01:27:18.040
 >> Total lane miles, we provided that information,

01:27:18.040 --> 01:27:20.200
 the traffic calming measures as well

01:27:20.200 --> 01:27:23.280
 as the unallocated bike fun usage.

01:27:23.280 --> 01:27:25.360
 So, about seven items that we're proposing

01:27:25.360 --> 01:27:26.680
 to remove off the list.

01:27:26.680 --> 01:27:32.880
 >> OK. Do we have any questions or comments

01:27:32.880 --> 01:27:35.360
 or concerns about any of those seven items

01:27:35.360 --> 01:27:37.600
 that we are proposing to remove from the list?

01:27:37.600 --> 01:27:38.200
 Is this--

01:27:38.200 --> 01:27:38.480
 >> Yes.

01:27:38.480 --> 01:27:39.440
 >> -- question related to that?

01:27:39.440 --> 01:27:39.880
 Yes.

01:27:39.880 --> 01:27:42.360
 >> I'd like to keep the Roodell one on there just

01:27:42.360 --> 01:27:45.360
 because there's some outstanding questions that I asked

01:27:45.360 --> 01:27:48.000
 to bring back that I'm fine with the rest of them.

01:27:48.000 --> 01:27:51.680
 I don't know that it's going to be prohibitive but like,

01:27:51.680 --> 01:27:53.640
 just because there are some outstanding questions.

01:27:53.640 --> 01:27:54.920
 Can we leave that one on there?

01:27:54.920 --> 01:27:56.480
 >> OK. We have a comment.

01:27:56.480 --> 01:27:58.080
 >> We can leave that one on there.

01:27:58.080 --> 01:28:00.120
 I would like to say the lane miles

01:28:00.120 --> 01:28:01.680
 that will come back annually.

01:28:01.680 --> 01:28:03.080
 So, we're going to-- I'm going

01:28:03.080 --> 01:28:06.600
 to propose changing the matrix slightly to add some annual

01:28:06.600 --> 01:28:09.520
 and quarterly reporting that's ongoing that we won't--

01:28:09.520 --> 01:28:11.040
 we're going to put it in a separate category

01:28:11.040 --> 01:28:12.560
 to make it easier to read.

01:28:12.560 --> 01:28:13.320
 >> Keep up with-- OK.

01:28:13.320 --> 01:28:16.240
 >> So, you might see it change next month but we will--

01:28:16.240 --> 01:28:18.360
 we'll bring that back every year going forward.

01:28:18.360 --> 01:28:23.200
 >> OK. Anyone else?

01:28:23.200 --> 01:28:23.680
 All right.

01:28:23.680 --> 01:28:25.400
 There's not any-- anything else.

01:28:25.400 --> 01:28:33.760
 We are going to-- I'll make a motion to approve removal--

01:28:33.760 --> 01:28:35.920
 we didn't remove anything.

01:28:35.920 --> 01:28:40.000
 We just-- well, we're removing but we also have amendments

01:28:40.000 --> 01:28:43.280
 to check-- to add additional-- OK.

01:28:43.280 --> 01:28:47.640
 I'm going to start over because I needed this.

01:28:47.640 --> 01:28:53.880
 I move that we-- I move to approve removal

01:28:53.880 --> 01:29:03.560
 of the stated items as noted with the exception of?

01:29:03.560 --> 01:29:07.640
 >> The Riddell and the--

01:29:07.640 --> 01:29:08.400
 >> Lane miles.

01:29:08.400 --> 01:29:10.360
 >> And the lane miles.

01:29:10.360 --> 01:29:12.920
 Can we get approval for that?

01:29:12.920 --> 01:29:15.480
 Can we hear the motion?

01:29:15.480 --> 01:29:16.680
 You second?

01:29:16.680 --> 01:29:17.800
 OK. You second.

01:29:17.800 --> 01:29:20.920
 Any other additional questions, comments?

01:29:20.920 --> 01:29:21.240
 All right.

01:29:21.240 --> 01:29:22.040
 Can we get a vote?

01:29:22.040 --> 01:29:23.280
 All in favor?

01:29:23.280 --> 01:29:24.060
 >> Aye.

01:29:24.060 --> 01:29:25.280
 >> Aye.

01:29:25.280 --> 01:29:25.640
 >> All right.

01:29:25.640 --> 01:29:26.680
 Aye. Ayes have it.

01:29:26.680 --> 01:29:28.360
 Thank you.

01:29:28.360 --> 01:29:30.880
 With that being said, concluding items.

01:29:30.880 --> 01:29:33.240
 Any concluding items?

01:29:33.240 --> 01:29:33.800
 All right.

01:29:33.800 --> 01:29:36.840
 Well, I am going to take the up-- yes, we have one concluding item.

01:29:36.840 --> 01:29:39.400
 >> Next meeting is scheduled for April 30th.

01:29:39.400 --> 01:29:42.560
 >> Next meeting, scheduled for April 30th.

01:29:42.560 --> 01:29:45.480
 We will go-- we didn't go over our meeting dates.

01:29:45.480 --> 01:29:47.200
 Are we OK with our meeting date?

01:29:47.200 --> 01:29:49.280
 Yes. Including item.

01:29:49.280 --> 01:29:50.720
 >> I like 10 o'clock.

01:29:50.720 --> 01:29:51.480
 I like it here.

01:29:51.480 --> 01:29:52.280
 >> OK.

01:29:52.280 --> 01:29:53.880
 >> OK. Ready?

01:29:53.880 --> 01:29:54.200
 >> Yes.

01:29:54.200 --> 01:29:54.800
 >> All right.

01:29:54.800 --> 01:29:55.680
 Thank you.

01:29:55.680 --> 01:29:59.840
 So this morning, we had Sam Balto from Portland ride

01:29:59.840 --> 01:30:02.360
 with the Newton Razor Elementary Bike Bus.

01:30:02.360 --> 01:30:05.000
 He's sort of known to be the person

01:30:05.000 --> 01:30:07.440
 who brought bike buses to the United States.

01:30:07.440 --> 01:30:08.480
 If you don't know what it is,

01:30:08.480 --> 01:30:11.840
 a bike bus is basically children once a week riding

01:30:11.840 --> 01:30:14.320
 to school together on the same route every single week.

01:30:14.320 --> 01:30:17.280
 It's a great way for kids to have an active way to get to school.

01:30:17.280 --> 01:30:19.800
 Actually, Lauren in our audience was there as well.

01:30:19.800 --> 01:30:21.240
 She rode with her kids.

01:30:21.240 --> 01:30:23.640
 So that was really cool to have him visit Denton.

01:30:23.640 --> 01:30:24.880
 He's going to Austin next.

01:30:24.880 --> 01:30:28.960
 And we're one of only like two cities he's going to visit in Texas.

01:30:28.960 --> 01:30:29.840
 So that was really cool.

01:30:29.840 --> 01:30:32.960
 He's the reason that we have a bike bus at all in Denton.

01:30:32.960 --> 01:30:35.400
 So it was really exciting to have him visit us.

01:30:35.400 --> 01:30:37.040
 So I just wanted to say it was very exciting.

01:30:37.040 --> 01:30:38.080
 >> Let me ask you a question.

01:30:38.080 --> 01:30:39.200
 What is a bike bus?

01:30:39.200 --> 01:30:42.680
 I mean, I'm thinking a bus with some bikes you put on top.

01:30:42.680 --> 01:30:45.240
 >> So it's kids on bikes and scooters

01:30:45.240 --> 01:30:47.800
 and sometimes rollerblades all riding

01:30:47.800 --> 01:30:49.440
 to school together along the same route.

01:30:49.440 --> 01:30:50.480
 >> It's like a little group ride.

01:30:50.480 --> 01:30:51.280
 >> It's a group ride.

01:30:51.280 --> 01:30:53.680
 >> Like they should kind of be doing it already anyway.

01:30:53.680 --> 01:30:56.560
 >> Yeah. And so it increases safety

01:30:56.560 --> 01:30:57.880
 and it's a lot more fun for the kids.

01:30:57.880 --> 01:31:00.040
 Some people will do a walking bike bus as well.

01:31:00.040 --> 01:31:01.600
 So it's just kids walking together

01:31:01.600 --> 01:31:03.160
 on the same route every single week.

01:31:03.160 --> 01:31:05.880
 >> Oh, we need to make that a city-wide project.

01:31:05.880 --> 01:31:06.680
 >> Yeah, it's super cool.

01:31:06.680 --> 01:31:10.680
 >> I see the yellow and they have red lights in the back.

01:31:10.680 --> 01:31:11.640
 >> You have bubbles.

01:31:11.640 --> 01:31:18.000
 >> OK. Well, sir, gentlemen, let's stay focused, please.

01:31:18.000 --> 01:31:22.360
 Because I know how you all are when we get on City Council.

01:31:22.360 --> 01:31:23.800
 All right.

01:31:23.800 --> 01:31:28.120
 With that being said, we will conclude this meeting at 1131.

01:31:28.120 --> 01:31:28.640
 Thank you.

01:31:28.640 --> 01:31:29.200
 >> Very good.

01:31:29.200 --> 01:31:29.520
 >> All right.

01:31:29.520 --> 01:31:30.880
 Now, you all can talk about bubbles.