WEBVTT

00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:08.040
 >> Good morning and welcome to this meeting of the mobility committee.

00:00:08.040 --> 00:00:13.040
 Seeing that we have a quorum, I'm going to open the meeting at 8, 10 AM.

00:00:13.040 --> 00:00:17.100
 That appears to be an inconvenient time, so next time we'll try for seven.

00:00:17.100 --> 00:00:22.400
 We'll move into item A and consider approval of the minutes.

00:00:22.400 --> 00:00:24.000
 I'll entertain a motion.

00:00:24.000 --> 00:00:25.440
 >> So moved.

00:00:25.440 --> 00:00:27.000
 >> All in favor?

00:00:27.000 --> 00:00:27.800
 >> Aye. >> Aye.

00:00:29.680 --> 00:00:36.120
 >> We're going to jump a little bit around in order to accommodate our high maintenance

00:00:36.120 --> 00:00:42.600
 representation from TXDOT and go into item E,

00:00:42.600 --> 00:00:46.840
 receive a report and hold a discussion regarding TXDOT on system projects in the Denton area.

00:00:46.840 --> 00:00:55.440
 >> Thank you, Mr. Chair.

00:00:55.440 --> 00:01:03.800
 John Polster, Innovative Transportation Solutions, 2701 Valleyview Lane, Farmer's Branch, Texas.

00:01:03.800 --> 00:01:06.280
 So we'll start with the report we have here.

00:01:06.280 --> 00:01:14.920
 The first sheet, hopefully, is the, how do I get rid of that?

00:01:14.920 --> 00:01:20.760
 How do I get- >> I'm going down, that's the next sheet.

00:01:20.760 --> 00:01:22.460
 >> How do I get rid of the black thing?

00:01:22.460 --> 00:01:27.920
 >> Just click anywhere.

00:01:27.920 --> 00:01:28.920
 >> I got other talents.

00:01:28.920 --> 00:01:36.640
 >> There we go.

00:01:36.640 --> 00:01:37.080
 >> Okay.

00:01:37.080 --> 00:01:45.680
 >> It doesn't disappear until nine o'clock.

00:01:45.680 --> 00:01:46.240
 >> Okay.

00:01:46.240 --> 00:01:47.360
 >> It's too early in the day.

00:01:47.360 --> 00:01:51.800
 >> Okay, so this is a list of all the projects that's in the report.

00:01:51.800 --> 00:01:57.320
 And the estimated revenue strain that we think that that represents.

00:01:57.320 --> 00:02:02.760
 And most of these projects, now the 35 projects are funded, are fully funded.

00:02:02.760 --> 00:02:08.880
 So we're looking at a little less than $2.5 billion worth of improvements on this report.

00:02:08.880 --> 00:02:11.320
 So your first report is 2181.

00:02:11.320 --> 00:02:18.440
 This is a project that was suspended when TXDOT terminated the contract with MCM.

00:02:18.440 --> 00:02:23.240
 We have gotten information back from the Dallas district after our last meeting.

00:02:23.240 --> 00:02:28.920
 We met with the district to see what the efforts could be to exploit this project.

00:02:28.920 --> 00:02:31.800
 And they decided that they think they're going to go ahead and

00:02:31.800 --> 00:02:35.800
 just surrender on all of the issues related to time and money.

00:02:35.800 --> 00:02:41.840
 And get the new contractor onsite by this about mid-October.

00:02:41.840 --> 00:02:44.080
 So they were saying end of year.

00:02:44.080 --> 00:02:48.120
 Now they're saying they think they're going to be able to get a new contractor

00:02:48.120 --> 00:02:51.980
 back on site by mid-October.

00:02:51.980 --> 00:02:55.000
 But they only sent that to me in a text message.

00:02:55.000 --> 00:02:57.760
 So when I get it officially, I'll put it in the report.

00:02:57.760 --> 00:03:06.440
 Then your next project is your Fort Worth Drive project.

00:03:06.440 --> 00:03:07.440
 It's under construction.

00:03:07.440 --> 00:03:11.720
 So we have a TXDOT report related to this project.

00:03:11.720 --> 00:03:14.600
 Again, this is- >> Actually, if you'd just wait a moment.

00:03:14.600 --> 00:03:18.520
 So I know that Councilmember Briggs gets a lot of questions on this.

00:03:18.520 --> 00:03:21.640
 Just so you're here.

00:03:21.640 --> 00:03:26.960
 >> 2181, TXDOT has said that they're going to basically give in on the time and

00:03:26.960 --> 00:03:33.720
 the cost and just try to get a new contractor onsite by October.

00:03:33.720 --> 00:03:35.800
 They were saying the end of year.

00:03:35.800 --> 00:03:41.760
 But when we met with them, we went over the history of how well TXDOT

00:03:41.760 --> 00:03:44.960
 negotiates with shirty bond companies.

00:03:44.960 --> 00:03:47.600
 And at the end of the day, they end up giving up anyway.

00:03:47.600 --> 00:03:52.260
 And so we're just telling them to surrender earlier and move on.

00:03:52.260 --> 00:03:53.480
 >> Okay, thank you.

00:03:53.480 --> 00:03:57.400
 >> So October, mid-October, we should have a contractor back on site.

00:03:57.400 --> 00:04:02.240
 So on your Fort Worth Drive, this is a seam of construction, essentially.

00:04:02.240 --> 00:04:07.840
 The major emphasis of work right now is at the shoe fly for the railroad.

00:04:07.840 --> 00:04:14.840
 And a lot of the concrete pavement up at the frontage road at 35E.

00:04:14.840 --> 00:04:16.640
 So that's pretty much what that says.

00:04:16.640 --> 00:04:21.120
 And they're still on track for 2021 timeframe to complete the project.

00:04:21.120 --> 00:04:26.800
 >> I believe August 29th is said and done.

00:04:26.800 --> 00:04:28.980
 >> Yes. >> But it did not happen.

00:04:28.980 --> 00:04:31.880
 Do they have an updated date as to when they're gonna shut it down?

00:04:31.880 --> 00:04:36.520
 >> Yeah, so the last time we met was two weeks ago.

00:04:36.520 --> 00:04:40.600
 >> Yeah, so I was out of town.

00:04:40.600 --> 00:04:44.400
 >> Cuz I saw the bridge there on the 28th.

00:04:44.400 --> 00:04:49.040
 >> I think they moved back to September sometime, but they didn't give us a date.

00:04:49.040 --> 00:04:53.360
 >> The concrete still had the wood forms on it, so I knew they weren't ready for it.

00:04:53.360 --> 00:04:55.560
 >> We'll get that updated before we send it back out.

00:04:55.560 --> 00:04:56.060
 >> Okay.

00:04:56.060 --> 00:05:02.800
 >> TXDOT never meets their schedules cuz the contractors don't.

00:05:02.800 --> 00:05:06.360
 All right, so this is your I-35E Mayhill ultimate project.

00:05:06.360 --> 00:05:12.260
 This is a project that will add the 12 lanes for both Mayhill North and 2499 South.

00:05:12.260 --> 00:05:18.480
 We have basically, you're in the process of acquiring the right of way.

00:05:18.480 --> 00:05:21.120
 And we have a November 2020 let date and

00:05:21.120 --> 00:05:25.440
 this project is funded at the $53.4 million.

00:05:25.440 --> 00:05:29.680
 So it'll go when it's ready to go and the right of way is pretty much controlling

00:05:29.680 --> 00:05:31.160
 that right now.

00:05:31.160 --> 00:05:35.100
 And the city's got some utilities that we need to coordinate to make sure

00:05:35.100 --> 00:05:39.320
 they're consistent with our schedule.

00:05:39.320 --> 00:05:47.720
 All right, so then this is the Luke 28835 existing brinker project.

00:05:47.720 --> 00:05:51.080
 The good news on this is that they continue to progress and

00:05:51.080 --> 00:05:56.800
 we're looking at mid September for the brinker interchange to be open.

00:05:56.800 --> 00:05:58.720
 We're working with your fine staff.

00:05:58.720 --> 00:06:03.800
 The contractor would not agree to a change order to put in a temporary signals.

00:06:03.800 --> 00:06:08.640
 They don't want any more work cuz right now they're paying the state about $7,500 a day.

00:06:08.640 --> 00:06:10.040
 For the privilege of doing this work.

00:06:10.040 --> 00:06:15.960
 So your fine staff has stepped up and said they'll help try to get it installed.

00:06:15.960 --> 00:06:21.240
 TechStux got some material and so we're working to try to get this

00:06:21.240 --> 00:06:26.280
 signal up in time for us to have the road open in September.

00:06:26.280 --> 00:06:30.520
 Cuz if you go drive there, it's physically there.

00:06:30.520 --> 00:06:35.600
 The pavement's put down, U-turns are there, and it's barricaded.

00:06:35.600 --> 00:06:39.440
 So we're gonna be having a lot of trouble keeping people out of there.

00:06:39.440 --> 00:06:43.400
 And so we want to open it, but we don't want to open it till we have the signals

00:06:43.400 --> 00:06:46.920
 up because the traffic on the furniture is pretty fast.

00:06:46.920 --> 00:06:50.820
 [BLANK_AUDIO]

00:06:50.820 --> 00:06:51.760
 >> Council Member Fritz.

00:06:51.760 --> 00:06:56.200
 >> Just for clarification, so we do have the light and

00:06:56.200 --> 00:06:59.960
 the city's going to install it mid September and then it can open?

00:06:59.960 --> 00:07:02.360
 Is that the chain of events?

00:07:02.360 --> 00:07:05.000
 >> So there are a couple things that we need to do.

00:07:05.000 --> 00:07:09.280
 Before we can go out there, we need an agreement with TechStux that they'll reimburse us.

00:07:09.280 --> 00:07:12.160
 TechStux just sent the agreement yesterday.

00:07:12.160 --> 00:07:16.640
 So we have to get it through our legal and get it on council to get it approved.

00:07:16.640 --> 00:07:20.920
 In the meantime, we can work something to get materials ordered and

00:07:20.920 --> 00:07:23.480
 other stuff moving so that we don't miss the deadline.

00:07:23.480 --> 00:07:26.200
 But we're gonna try every bit to meet that.

00:07:27.360 --> 00:07:32.000
 >> So we're doing a temporary signal now because remember we're coming right back

00:07:32.000 --> 00:07:36.160
 on the previous job, we're coming right back and tearing all this out in November.

00:07:36.160 --> 00:07:38.880
 And that project will put in a permanent metal pole.

00:07:38.880 --> 00:07:43.600
 So this will be temporary signals in the interim span wire.

00:07:43.600 --> 00:07:48.240
 And I think TechStux said they'd even be, they've got some poles they can

00:07:48.240 --> 00:07:50.680
 let the city use if they're up to standard.

00:07:50.680 --> 00:07:55.560
 So we're working every angle we can to make sure that we don't have this

00:07:55.560 --> 00:08:00.520
 setting there barricaded off when the governor comes into town in October.

00:08:00.520 --> 00:08:01.720
 >> Councilmember Wright.

00:08:01.720 --> 00:08:06.920
 >> Yeah, and I believe I saw a email come through that, I think it's next week that

00:08:06.920 --> 00:08:12.120
 they're shutting down the southbound ramp for that exit.

00:08:12.120 --> 00:08:14.600
 And it will reopen around the 20th.

00:08:14.600 --> 00:08:17.280
 >> So that's the official plan.

00:08:17.280 --> 00:08:22.120
 They're trying to keep those closures on that ramp at night as much as possible.

00:08:22.120 --> 00:08:25.000
 But yes, in theory, it could be closed for a week.

00:08:26.200 --> 00:08:31.200
 They're trying to work with the contractor to see how much time they can keep it open.

00:08:31.200 --> 00:08:41.440
 All right, so everything I just said is right here on the TechStux report.

00:08:41.440 --> 00:08:45.440
 And then you've got, this is the merge.

00:08:45.440 --> 00:08:49.760
 You'll note that we've changed the limits to meet what TechStux had funded.

00:08:49.760 --> 00:08:52.240
 So this section is what we call the merge.

00:08:52.240 --> 00:08:57.120
 And it is, I'm saying 320, it's like 319 million and some change.

00:08:57.120 --> 00:09:02.840
 For these improvements, and this is permanent improvements.

00:09:02.840 --> 00:09:07.680
 So this will add, ultimately on 35E coming through Denton,

00:09:07.680 --> 00:09:11.040
 you'll have managed lanes just like you do south of the lake.

00:09:11.040 --> 00:09:17.160
 So as we make the curve going up to 380, 35E and

00:09:17.160 --> 00:09:22.560
 35 will include capacity in the middle of the facility for

00:09:22.560 --> 00:09:24.640
 future additions of those managed lanes.

00:09:24.640 --> 00:09:30.520
 Similar to what they did at 407, where 407 has been built for the ultimate.

00:09:30.520 --> 00:09:33.640
 And we're only using two of the four lanes for managed now.

00:09:33.640 --> 00:09:37.080
 We'll build the permanent structures in this corridor,

00:09:37.080 --> 00:09:42.720
 which will include availability to restripe the managed lanes in the future.

00:09:44.480 --> 00:09:50.600
 And its partner project, if it can be left at the same time it will be,

00:09:50.600 --> 00:09:58.160
 is the rest of the project from 380 up to basically the county line.

00:09:58.160 --> 00:10:01.000
 It's just north of the county line to 3002.

00:10:01.000 --> 00:10:03.440
 This project is at 546 million.

00:10:03.440 --> 00:10:07.840
 The commission improved it before we were telling you it was funded because it was

00:10:07.840 --> 00:10:15.240
 draft at the previous highway commission meeting past Thursday into August.

00:10:15.240 --> 00:10:18.600
 They approved it and it included these funds.

00:10:18.600 --> 00:10:22.400
 So this is now officially funded in its entirety.

00:10:22.400 --> 00:10:24.920
 So between the wishbone and these two projects,

00:10:24.920 --> 00:10:29.160
 you're looking at just under $900 million in funding.

00:10:29.160 --> 00:10:32.120
 It's gonna be brought to our region in this area.

00:10:32.120 --> 00:10:37.520
 And again, it's got a September 22 let date.

00:10:37.520 --> 00:10:39.780
 A lot of right away to acquire in this corridor.

00:10:39.780 --> 00:10:50.880
 And then this is the 35W, the other leg of the 35s in Denton County.

00:10:50.880 --> 00:10:57.800
 Right now we're waiting on, we just got the traffic from TP&P on August 27.

00:10:57.800 --> 00:11:01.680
 So now H&TB can go back to doing their work on the schematic.

00:11:01.680 --> 00:11:05.920
 We're looking at spring of next year, having the schematic approved.

00:11:05.920 --> 00:11:10.440
 And then a sister companion project to this project

00:11:10.440 --> 00:11:14.800
 is the 35W frontage road project and this is being done by Jacobs.

00:11:14.800 --> 00:11:18.480
 And they are actually doing the full on construction documents for

00:11:18.480 --> 00:11:20.080
 the entire corridor.

00:11:20.080 --> 00:11:24.680
 So now that we've got this part of the bottleneck on 35 resolved,

00:11:24.680 --> 00:11:31.200
 our next effort will be to finding sections of 35W where the frontage roads

00:11:31.200 --> 00:11:35.400
 appear to be warranted, similar to what we're doing down here in the south where

00:11:35.400 --> 00:11:39.240
 we're building sections of frontage road as a development occurs.

00:11:39.240 --> 00:11:43.720
 It appears that that will be in the northern part of this project based upon

00:11:43.720 --> 00:11:47.280
 what Hillwood's doing and what the city's got going on in this corridor.

00:11:47.280 --> 00:11:52.680
 So even though it's $300 million, we'll be taking in sections of those frontage

00:11:52.680 --> 00:11:57.080
 roads and building them once they're environmentally clear.

00:11:57.080 --> 00:11:59.680
 We can build any part of it that we want.

00:11:59.680 --> 00:12:05.380
 And we're looking at having it cleared again sometime next year.

00:12:05.380 --> 00:12:09.120
 And then this is for the ultimate to be let.

00:12:09.120 --> 00:12:13.440
 So once we get it cleared, we can identify individual sections and

00:12:13.440 --> 00:12:21.100
 build limits like from 1171 to 2449 or 2449 up to 35.

00:12:21.100 --> 00:12:22.520
 We don't have to build the whole corridor.

00:12:22.520 --> 00:12:26.720
 So the date to watch on this one is March 2020.

00:12:26.720 --> 00:12:30.240
 [BLANK_AUDIO]

00:12:30.240 --> 00:12:33.560
 Okay, and this is your 380 East job, a couple of things.

00:12:33.560 --> 00:12:36.400
 One, it's fully funded.

00:12:36.400 --> 00:12:40.600
 It's just a little under $130 million.

00:12:40.600 --> 00:12:45.160
 There are significant parcels to acquire in the blue section for sure.

00:12:45.160 --> 00:12:48.920
 Text that wants to expedite the construction of the green section which

00:12:48.920 --> 00:12:53.160
 is in the city of Denton, which requires us to do a little bit more coordination

00:12:53.160 --> 00:12:59.200
 with the city related to their utilities to make sure that what text that schedule

00:12:59.200 --> 00:13:03.040
 is for this corridor is consistent with what the city can do to get their utilities

00:13:03.040 --> 00:13:07.440
 out of the way and so we're meeting every two weeks on that.

00:13:07.440 --> 00:13:13.640
 And we should be okay on this project but they want to let the green section first.

00:13:13.640 --> 00:13:16.000
 Cuz they have, remember I've told you that time about it.

00:13:16.000 --> 00:13:19.720
 We never worry about money because it's not a 10 year plan.

00:13:19.720 --> 00:13:22.200
 It's 10 one year plans and it's not 10 one year plans.

00:13:22.200 --> 00:13:25.120
 It's 12 months per year so they have to let those dates and

00:13:25.120 --> 00:13:26.520
 hit those times and those monies.

00:13:26.520 --> 00:13:32.480
 They've got a project that fell out in this fiscal year and

00:13:32.480 --> 00:13:37.520
 they want to backfill it with this project because it's ready to go essentially.

00:13:37.520 --> 00:13:40.880
 And they have to let those dollar amounts and so they're looking for

00:13:40.880 --> 00:13:46.340
 an assist from us on their budgeting.

00:13:46.340 --> 00:13:48.520
 Which helps us cuz we get the project sooner.

00:13:48.520 --> 00:13:52.760
 That's that faith based engineering I talk about.

00:13:52.760 --> 00:13:56.120
 We get it ready and then when somebody else fails we just step in.

00:13:56.120 --> 00:14:02.320
 Loop 288, okay, so about the only good news we got on this is we finally

00:14:02.320 --> 00:14:06.240
 do have our traffic, we got that on August 27th.

00:14:06.240 --> 00:14:10.400
 So CP&Y is now in the process of updating their schematic to

00:14:10.400 --> 00:14:16.920
 incorporate the assumptions related to the traffic.

00:14:16.920 --> 00:14:18.320
 And why is that important?

00:14:18.320 --> 00:14:22.800
 Because this is a controlled access facility with ramping and

00:14:22.800 --> 00:14:24.960
 grade separations at major intersections.

00:14:24.960 --> 00:14:31.280
 And you can't show the public officially the schematic that has the ramps

00:14:31.280 --> 00:14:34.920
 in certain locations unless you have the traffic to justify those locations and

00:14:34.920 --> 00:14:35.520
 those ramps.

00:14:35.520 --> 00:14:40.760
 And so although we've had the schematic for a long time, without the traffic,

00:14:40.760 --> 00:14:45.640
 we're not authorized to publicly show it and get public input from it.

00:14:45.640 --> 00:14:48.560
 Cuz we didn't have the backbone for the traffic on it.

00:14:48.560 --> 00:14:53.200
 So this is important, which means that we'll probably have a better chance of

00:14:53.200 --> 00:14:57.320
 meeting that April 2020 environmental clearance date.

00:14:57.320 --> 00:15:01.160
 And once we hit that, all of these are as fast as you can get them done.

00:15:01.160 --> 00:15:05.160
 So if we can beat the schedule, then we can move the project up in this time frame.

00:15:05.160 --> 00:15:12.000
 FM 1515.

00:15:12.000 --> 00:15:16.400
 So we finally beat down TechStock to go ahead and

00:15:16.400 --> 00:15:22.240
 show the roundabout at Western on their next public involvement process.

00:15:22.240 --> 00:15:25.320
 So there'll be a, I'm not calling this a roundabout.

00:15:25.320 --> 00:15:27.080
 Is a traffic circle a roundabout?

00:15:27.080 --> 00:15:27.800
 >> It's a roundabout.

00:15:27.800 --> 00:15:28.800
 >> A roundabout.

00:15:28.800 --> 00:15:31.520
 >> Here, this is where there's gonna be a circle, essentially.

00:15:31.520 --> 00:15:34.800
 So when the 18 liters get lost and come into the airport's parking lot,

00:15:34.800 --> 00:15:37.540
 they don't have to do a 15 point turn to get out.

00:15:37.540 --> 00:15:40.560
 >> Pardon me, can you remind us of what the difference is?

00:15:40.560 --> 00:15:43.360
 >> Yes.

00:15:43.360 --> 00:15:50.480
 >> So a roundabout is a intersection control measure.

00:15:50.480 --> 00:15:53.960
 It's similar to stop control or a signal.

00:15:53.960 --> 00:15:59.120
 But it is a intersection control where traffic is channelized

00:15:59.120 --> 00:16:02.840
 through the intersection in an orderly fashion.

00:16:02.840 --> 00:16:12.560
 A circle, in the other sense, it is more of a it's not a device to,

00:16:12.560 --> 00:16:20.560
 it's an older design that does not take into account the speeds, the flow of traffic.

00:16:20.560 --> 00:16:27.440
 And in order to maneuver through a circle, there could be stop signs before that.

00:16:27.440 --> 00:16:35.360
 There could be yield signs, so there is no definite way of assigning traffic in their right of way.

00:16:35.360 --> 00:16:41.160
 But in a roundabout, it's assigned pretty appropriate.

00:16:41.160 --> 00:16:45.920
 >> In essence, is a circle one lane around and a roundabout is two?

00:16:45.920 --> 00:16:48.820
 >> No, it could be multiple lanes.

00:16:48.820 --> 00:16:55.060
 >> Okay, so I grew up in Fort Worth, and on the western part of Fort Worth,

00:16:55.060 --> 00:16:59.000
 we used to call it the Weatherford traffic circle, have you all ever been out there?

00:16:59.000 --> 00:17:03.600
 And to me, a traffic circle is the stuff that European vacation people get stuck on,

00:17:03.600 --> 00:17:04.880
 where it's a big giant.

00:17:04.880 --> 00:17:10.840
 To me, that's in my mind what I call it, but this is a turnaround at the end so

00:17:10.840 --> 00:17:12.000
 the trucks can get back out.

00:17:12.000 --> 00:17:16.920
 At western, there'll be a roundabout for that intersection, and

00:17:16.920 --> 00:17:24.000
 then the rest of it will be a standard six lane facility all the way to 35.

00:17:24.000 --> 00:17:24.760
 >> Question?

00:17:24.760 --> 00:17:30.360
 >> I attended the tech stop meeting on this the other day, and

00:17:30.360 --> 00:17:37.760
 the alignment of the service road, which right now hits kind of at the top of the bridge.

00:17:37.760 --> 00:17:43.840
 If you're coming south, and then you gotta turn and go to the west before you can actually get back on it.

00:17:43.840 --> 00:17:46.120
 >> Correct. >> As I said, when they come in with the project for

00:17:46.120 --> 00:17:50.760
 service roads- >> We'll fix it with that big project with the merge.

00:17:50.760 --> 00:17:55.560
 >> So will it be under the Y project or under the service roads project?

00:17:55.560 --> 00:17:59.920
 >> It'll probably be under the Y project cuz it's north of the railroad track, isn't it?

00:17:59.920 --> 00:18:03.600
 So that's your demarcation, nobody wants to touch that track.

00:18:03.600 --> 00:18:08.360
 >> Yeah, but the service road goes over the top of the track.

00:18:08.360 --> 00:18:11.680
 >> All right, we'll get you there, to that you're on your own.

00:18:13.680 --> 00:18:16.260
 >> Yeah, everybody's fighting over who's gonna have to deal with the railroad track.

00:18:16.260 --> 00:18:24.800
 All right, and then as a part of the 35 project to the north, the larger project,

00:18:24.800 --> 00:18:31.600
 we've made sure that the schematic includes the location of FM 1173 consistent with

00:18:31.600 --> 00:18:34.680
 the city's thoroughfare plan, which is that red alignment.

00:18:34.680 --> 00:18:39.440
 And Garver has now given us additional information on their schedule.

00:18:39.440 --> 00:18:43.880
 We're looking at having an environmental clearance, basically they just got started now.

00:18:43.880 --> 00:18:49.360
 So about 18 months from now, we think we'll get it environmentally cleared, and

00:18:49.360 --> 00:18:52.360
 that's when we can start really pushing on the rest of the schedule.

00:18:52.360 --> 00:18:56.760
 It's not funded, but again, we're doing it under faith-based engineering,

00:18:56.760 --> 00:18:59.400
 because this is a project that TechSite asked us to do.

00:18:59.400 --> 00:19:06.680
 And so you figure they're asking us to move it forward.

00:19:06.680 --> 00:19:09.520
 Once we get it ready to construct, they'll help us find the money.

00:19:09.520 --> 00:19:16.720
 And the reason that dollar amount is so high is there's a lot of drainage

00:19:16.720 --> 00:19:21.460
 associated with this section of 1173 that also has to be dealt with in the job.

00:19:21.460 --> 00:19:27.560
 Okay, so here's your 428 project.

00:19:27.560 --> 00:19:29.640
 We've separated the color coding.

00:19:29.640 --> 00:19:33.680
 This is the work that Preetam and his group is working to make some improvements on

00:19:33.680 --> 00:19:35.480
 the inside of the loop.

00:19:35.480 --> 00:19:41.860
 They're working with TechSite to get a signalized intersection at 288 and 428.

00:19:41.860 --> 00:19:45.520
 And then we're working with TechSite to hire somebody.

00:19:45.520 --> 00:19:49.040
 I think they're saying they'll have it by the end of the year, yes.

00:19:49.040 --> 00:19:53.840
 Have somebody on to analyze 428 as a controlled access facility.

00:19:53.840 --> 00:19:57.360
 So we'll have frontage roads and main lanes.

00:19:57.360 --> 00:20:02.920
 And so we're slowly but surely bringing this project up into the system and

00:20:02.920 --> 00:20:07.200
 getting it reviewed through the regulatory process.

00:20:07.200 --> 00:20:13.280
 And the new one is Bonnie Bray, phase seven.

00:20:13.280 --> 00:20:15.960
 Is that my Roman numeral's right?

00:20:15.960 --> 00:20:16.760
 >> You're right.

00:20:16.760 --> 00:20:21.240
 >> It doesn't have a money sign on it, so I can't do it.

00:20:21.240 --> 00:20:27.800
 And this is the project that this section right here is the section that basically

00:20:27.800 --> 00:20:32.320
 the MPO has told us, or COG has told us that they'll work with TechSite to get

00:20:32.320 --> 00:20:33.320
 this section funded.

00:20:33.320 --> 00:20:36.880
 So the city's done some preliminary engineering.

00:20:36.880 --> 00:20:38.720
 TechSite and the MPO have looked at it.

00:20:38.720 --> 00:20:40.920
 They like the design.

00:20:40.920 --> 00:20:43.480
 And so we're working with TechSite to get this segment funded.

00:20:43.480 --> 00:20:48.360
 And then this is a segment where the COG is working with the city and

00:20:48.360 --> 00:20:53.920
 the county to make improvements for the new high school didn't high.

00:20:53.920 --> 00:20:56.400
 And so we don't really have a schedule yet.

00:20:56.400 --> 00:21:00.320
 We're just not getting started on it, but yeah.

00:21:01.840 --> 00:21:02.840
 >> But why isn't it straighter?

00:21:02.840 --> 00:21:07.100
 >> The green section?

00:21:07.100 --> 00:21:12.800
 >> Yeah. >> There's a creek channel right

00:21:12.800 --> 00:21:18.000
 through there, if I had an aerial, basically all of that is a giant creek.

00:21:18.000 --> 00:21:22.160
 And so we're having to straddle it at the more opportune.

00:21:22.160 --> 00:21:25.120
 Which is why right now it jogs.

00:21:25.120 --> 00:21:30.560
 You come up and then you go up 77 and then you go up because they missed that creek.

00:21:30.560 --> 00:21:35.360
 But with this job, with TechSite and COG funding it,

00:21:35.360 --> 00:21:40.200
 some problems are solved by geometry, others are solved by money.

00:21:40.200 --> 00:21:43.520
 And so this one's just going to be a little bit more expensive.

00:21:43.520 --> 00:21:46.240
 >> That's what we're basically doing.

00:21:46.240 --> 00:21:48.800
 >> So it's like a, is it an environmentally sensitive area?

00:21:48.800 --> 00:21:51.000
 >> Not after we're done with it.

00:21:51.000 --> 00:21:55.840
 >> I'm joking, I don't know.

00:21:55.840 --> 00:21:59.360
 Whatever the environmental regulatory process is, we're going to have to go

00:21:59.360 --> 00:22:01.040
 through that obviously because it's federal dollars.

00:22:01.040 --> 00:22:07.840
 So it'll go through the same, you know, regulatory process as all of them do.

00:22:07.840 --> 00:22:13.280
 So it'll be any, if we do wetlands, we'll have to mitigate.

00:22:13.280 --> 00:22:18.800
 If there's any type of floodplain changes, we'll have to address that through FEMA.

00:22:18.800 --> 00:22:21.000
 So it'll be federally funded.

00:22:21.000 --> 00:22:25.720
 So it's fully regulatorily reviewed.

00:22:27.720 --> 00:22:31.960
 >> So the existing alignment, if you see that little piece that comes down from Bonny Bray,

00:22:31.960 --> 00:22:33.560
 that's the alignment along the creek.

00:22:33.560 --> 00:22:36.000
 So there's more areas in that area.

00:22:36.000 --> 00:22:37.880
 That's why we're getting away from that.

00:22:37.880 --> 00:22:39.520
 The other thing is the spacing.

00:22:39.520 --> 00:22:42.600
 You see there's an interchange with 77.

00:22:42.600 --> 00:22:47.000
 If we align Bonny Bray away from that, we get better spacing along loop 288.

00:22:47.000 --> 00:22:49.760
 So there are a couple factors that we're looking at.

00:22:49.760 --> 00:22:55.240
 The other thing also is loop 288 at that location is dipped and

00:22:55.240 --> 00:23:00.000
 there is an elevated area so that you have a better bridge to go over the loop to it.

00:23:00.000 --> 00:23:02.520
 So there are several things that we had looked at.

00:23:02.520 --> 00:23:06.080
 That's why it's a little bit not straightened out.

00:23:06.080 --> 00:23:07.400
 It's a little bit at an angle.

00:23:07.400 --> 00:23:09.160
 >> Engineers like straighter than get it.

00:23:09.160 --> 00:23:10.640
 So if it's not, there's a reason.

00:23:10.640 --> 00:23:17.760
 And we're also looking at potential for in the future with 428 improvements,

00:23:17.760 --> 00:23:22.560
 making actual frontage roads along 288 in this corridor at some point in the future.

00:23:24.280 --> 00:23:28.120
 And I believe that's it for me.

00:23:28.120 --> 00:23:30.400
 >> That's more for bricks.

00:23:30.400 --> 00:23:34.280
 >> Yes, I have a couple of questions at the Dallas Regional Mobility Committee.

00:23:34.280 --> 00:23:38.840
 We heard two updates and I just wanted to ask here if any of those would affect

00:23:38.840 --> 00:23:44.200
 the city of Denton that Mr. Vaughn was appointed to the Texas Transportation

00:23:44.200 --> 00:23:52.800
 Commission and the 2020 UTP funding proposed funding has been approved or is out.

00:23:52.800 --> 00:23:58.960
 So as we go through all of these updates for any of those affect our projects?

00:23:58.960 --> 00:23:59.440
 >> Yes, ma'am.

00:23:59.440 --> 00:24:08.760
 So the 2020 UTP fully funded the I-35E merge and the north segment.

00:24:08.760 --> 00:24:16.080
 So it was some 800 and almost 900 million dollars is fully funded in the 2020 UTP.

00:24:16.080 --> 00:24:23.720
 And then they also funded the segment in Dallas County from 635 up to

00:24:23.720 --> 00:24:27.700
 the Dallas County line in Denton County.

00:24:27.700 --> 00:24:31.600
 So although it's not in Denton County per se,

00:24:31.600 --> 00:24:37.000
 it impacts Denton County because most of our commuters travel down 35E.

00:24:37.000 --> 00:24:40.120
 But they'll be coming in and adding additional general purpose lanes,

00:24:40.120 --> 00:24:41.600
 all the managed lanes.

00:24:41.600 --> 00:24:45.160
 So there'll be four ultimately in that corridor, and

00:24:45.160 --> 00:24:48.640
 putting all the permanent improvements there it's like 700 million bucks.

00:24:48.640 --> 00:24:53.600
 So Denton County in the surrounding infrastructure

00:24:53.600 --> 00:24:58.280
 fared very well in the 2020 UTP.

00:24:58.280 --> 00:25:03.640
 Because what also was reaffirmed in that were all of our breakout projects.

00:25:03.640 --> 00:25:09.720
 So Mayhills reaffirmed 1171 corporate and 121 business.

00:25:09.720 --> 00:25:15.360
 Those are all close to $300 million worth of improvements that

00:25:15.360 --> 00:25:19.320
 were reaffirmed in the 2020 UTP.

00:25:19.320 --> 00:25:23.560
 The gentleman that was appointed for the Highway Commission,

00:25:23.560 --> 00:25:28.480
 we technically have two representatives from North Texas right now.

00:25:28.480 --> 00:25:32.600
 Cuz Victor Vandergriff is still on the Highway Commission, he hasn't resigned.

00:25:32.600 --> 00:25:39.560
 But in order for the region not to be able to say we don't have any representation

00:25:39.560 --> 00:25:42.840
 on the commission, because Victor's not allowed to go to the Highway Commission

00:25:42.840 --> 00:25:49.400
 anymore, the governor appointed the new guy for the North Texas area.

00:25:49.400 --> 00:25:53.080
 So the next appointment will be for the East Texas region.

00:25:53.080 --> 00:25:58.200
 So we now have a Dallas representative on the Highway Commission.

00:25:58.200 --> 00:26:02.640
 And he seems, he made the motion, I mean this was his first meeting in August.

00:26:02.640 --> 00:26:05.720
 And he made the motion to adopt the UTP that he didn't even know anything about.

00:26:05.720 --> 00:26:11.440
 So it looks like he's gonna jump straight in and start doing stuff.

00:26:11.440 --> 00:26:13.080
 >> Okay. >> So I think he's a good guy.

00:26:13.080 --> 00:26:14.280
 >> Okay, thank you for that update.

00:26:14.280 --> 00:26:20.040
 >> Hey, Preetam, this is something that I know you did a year ago.

00:26:20.040 --> 00:26:22.800
 And I think it might be time to relook at it.

00:26:22.800 --> 00:26:25.920
 Tell me if this is a very burdensome request.

00:26:25.920 --> 00:26:31.200
 But I think it'd be helpful for me and probably for the public to see all

00:26:31.200 --> 00:26:35.560
 the construction that's intended to be simultaneous on a map.

00:26:35.560 --> 00:26:39.840
 But ideally, a sequence, maybe it's two or three.

00:26:39.840 --> 00:26:42.840
 If you line up the dates, right, here's a snapshot of time.

00:26:42.840 --> 00:26:49.680
 Maybe you use yellow for the text out projects and green for the city ones.

00:26:49.680 --> 00:26:52.520
 But here's everything that's gonna be going on.

00:26:52.520 --> 00:26:55.920
 And then the next phase, here's everything that's gonna be going on.

00:26:55.920 --> 00:26:58.560
 I just think it'd be helpful for communication.

00:26:58.560 --> 00:27:02.720
 >> We are currently working on a map like that between all our departments.

00:27:02.720 --> 00:27:05.640
 And Water Wastewater has their own projects as well.

00:27:05.640 --> 00:27:11.480
 So we're trying to match everything and as far as phasing,

00:27:11.480 --> 00:27:16.560
 we do have our plan in the future where in the next couple years this is coming online.

00:27:16.560 --> 00:27:18.920
 And in the next five years this is coming online.

00:27:18.920 --> 00:27:22.920
 So yes, we can definitely bring something like that forward.

00:27:22.920 --> 00:27:26.080
 >> I mentioned you needed it from mobility plan anyway, it just occurred to me.

00:27:26.080 --> 00:27:27.480
 >> There is an update from mobility.

00:27:27.480 --> 00:27:33.000
 >> Well, I do one for each of my counties where you have projects in all the precincts.

00:27:33.000 --> 00:27:39.880
 And there are always times like we have here on 35 where your best laid plans

00:27:39.880 --> 00:27:43.000
 go astray because you gotta chase the funding.

00:27:43.000 --> 00:27:47.040
 And so you have all these projects being built in one heat area.

00:27:47.040 --> 00:27:48.920
 And it goes on for a period of time.

00:27:48.920 --> 00:27:54.280
 And so we've got this 11 by 17 that kinda shows everything in a pictorial view.

00:27:54.280 --> 00:27:59.200
 So we can get it to pretend if he wants to copy it.

00:27:59.200 --> 00:28:03.880
 >> That could help create sort of a narrative of what's the big picture that's happening.

00:28:03.880 --> 00:28:06.640
 >> What we do is we use red for the construction.

00:28:06.640 --> 00:28:09.360
 So that when you look at all these projects overlapping each other,

00:28:09.360 --> 00:28:10.880
 you see this big giant heat map.

00:28:10.880 --> 00:28:20.480
 >> They reflect levels of frustration for drivers by color.

00:28:20.480 --> 00:28:20.980
 Thanks.

00:28:22.680 --> 00:28:25.920
 >> Great, okay.

00:28:25.920 --> 00:28:27.280
 Thank you very much for that update.

00:28:27.280 --> 00:28:31.960
 Let's move on now to item B.

00:28:31.960 --> 00:28:34.880
 Receive a report, hold a discussion, give staff direction about bicycle and

00:28:34.880 --> 00:28:36.880
 pedestrian facilities in Southeast Denton.

00:28:36.880 --> 00:28:48.240
 >> Yeah, this is the hopscotch.

00:28:53.200 --> 00:28:54.960
 >> Do you want to see it or do you want to be surprised?

00:28:54.960 --> 00:29:05.160
 >> Good morning, Mark Oliphant, Bicycle and Pedestrian Coordinator for the city.

00:29:05.160 --> 00:29:11.280
 This morning I'm going to be talking about facilities in the southeast quadrant of Denton,

00:29:11.280 --> 00:29:17.800
 both for bicycles and pedestrians, where we are with built facilities,

00:29:17.800 --> 00:29:24.440
 what our former plans are, and looking ahead as we are currently

00:29:24.440 --> 00:29:29.400
 formulating our mobility plan, what sort of improvements we're looking at with that.

00:29:29.400 --> 00:29:33.920
 So quickly, just to familiarize you with the area,

00:29:33.920 --> 00:29:37.880
 generally we're looking at south of McKinney Street,

00:29:37.880 --> 00:29:44.080
 west of the Elm Locust Corridor, south of, I'm sorry.

00:29:44.080 --> 00:29:50.920
 I went south of McKinney, north of I-35, and on the east May Hill.

00:29:50.920 --> 00:29:57.720
 Yes, here's your, it makes sense, you can see on the map.

00:29:57.720 --> 00:30:00.680
 So that's the general area that we're looking at.

00:30:00.680 --> 00:30:08.720
 Now first off, I'd like to point out, now this area has our crown jewel of bicycle and

00:30:08.720 --> 00:30:14.680
 pedestrian facilities in that the Katy Trail or the A-Train Trail goes through the area,

00:30:14.680 --> 00:30:25.160
 which is a really fantastic, safe, protected facility that we'd love to see more of.

00:30:25.160 --> 00:30:30.600
 And so, that's a, as far as discussing this area of town,

00:30:30.600 --> 00:30:34.880
 that's really something important to point out, that it has this.

00:30:34.880 --> 00:30:37.200
 And it's something that we can grow off of.

00:30:37.200 --> 00:30:42.920
 So, let's look at, here's the city GIS layer that shows bicycle facilities and

00:30:42.920 --> 00:30:45.920
 it shows what's built and what's planned to be built and so forth.

00:30:45.920 --> 00:30:52.720
 We don't have, this is on the street, so we don't have the A-Train Trail highlighted.

00:30:52.720 --> 00:30:59.440
 But you can see, so up in the downtown area, we do have some different things.

00:30:59.440 --> 00:31:04.960
 We do have some segments of bike lane, sharos, and

00:31:04.960 --> 00:31:09.560
 then as we get further from the downtown area, there's not as much.

00:31:09.560 --> 00:31:13.560
 And we have planned but not funded facilities,

00:31:13.560 --> 00:31:17.040
 you'll see those dashed lines, planned but not funded.

00:31:17.040 --> 00:31:22.160
 We do have on Moores and on Shady Oaks some shared roadway signage,

00:31:22.160 --> 00:31:29.680
 which is something, it's not the very best, but it is something.

00:31:29.680 --> 00:31:35.400
 And I think we can use this as a stepping stone to even better facilities as we

00:31:35.400 --> 00:31:38.800
 look ahead with the mobility plan and so forth.

00:31:38.800 --> 00:31:42.720
 Also over here is the Mayhill, which was a funded bicycle route and

00:31:42.720 --> 00:31:44.840
 is essentially finished.

00:31:44.840 --> 00:31:47.960
 There has been some discussion lately, Mayhill is beautiful.

00:31:47.960 --> 00:31:52.360
 We have this nice wide path next to the roadway.

00:31:52.360 --> 00:31:54.680
 But getting to and from Mayhill is an issue.

00:31:54.680 --> 00:31:58.720
 And that's something that we're aware of and that we are looking into.

00:31:58.720 --> 00:32:04.280
 Next one here, this is from the actual plan map from

00:32:04.280 --> 00:32:14.240
 an adopted bicycle plan five years ago and what that was looking at building.

00:32:14.240 --> 00:32:20.160
 One important thing to see on here is if you'll look at these dotted green lines.

00:32:20.160 --> 00:32:26.720
 Those are in the stream valley for Pecan Creek, I believe it's called.

00:32:26.720 --> 00:32:31.280
 And that's something that as part of the mobility plan,

00:32:31.280 --> 00:32:36.920
 we are making an extra effort to rope the Parks and

00:32:36.920 --> 00:32:43.200
 Recreation Department into our comprehensive planning for non-motorized travel.

00:32:43.200 --> 00:32:47.920
 Because for cyclists, pedestrians, they don't care whether the asset is provided

00:32:47.920 --> 00:32:51.880
 by the transportation department as part of the roadway network or

00:32:51.880 --> 00:32:55.200
 it's a park facility or something like that.

00:32:55.200 --> 00:33:02.040
 And we're seeing a lot of opportunities to build off of that.

00:33:02.040 --> 00:33:04.920
 Another thing I mentioned is possibilities for

00:33:04.920 --> 00:33:10.800
 using the rail trail, the KD train or

00:33:10.800 --> 00:33:14.840
 a train rail trail as a spine network so

00:33:14.840 --> 00:33:18.120
 that we can build off of that with road crossings.

00:33:21.400 --> 00:33:25.520
 Council of Governments, they also keep their own map,

00:33:25.520 --> 00:33:31.280
 which ideally is synced with ours, although timing doesn't always work out with that.

00:33:31.280 --> 00:33:34.840
 But they also have some similar aspirations.

00:33:34.840 --> 00:33:40.640
 You'll notice a lot of the detail in that area of town is the dashed lines,

00:33:40.640 --> 00:33:45.360
 or dotted, which are planned but not yet funded.

00:33:45.360 --> 00:33:48.760
 But all of these, just because they are on that regional plan,

00:33:48.760 --> 00:33:55.520
 they are eligible for funding through the Council of Governments by getting them on their map.

00:33:55.520 --> 00:34:01.760
 We then have a leg up in getting funding assistance for those.

00:34:01.760 --> 00:34:07.400
 Finally, I'm going to talk about what's going on currently with the mobility plan.

00:34:07.400 --> 00:34:10.960
 Well, you'll get a full update, but recently we've done some outreach,

00:34:10.960 --> 00:34:13.680
 some public meetings, things like that.

00:34:13.680 --> 00:34:21.560
 And on the right here is just a photograph, a screen capture of a poster board that we had.

00:34:21.560 --> 00:34:26.240
 And we invited all the participants of these public meetings to come and mark up.

00:34:26.240 --> 00:34:33.440
 On the bottom is a legend, red, barriers or stressful routes.

00:34:33.440 --> 00:34:38.960
 Blue, desired routes or destinations, now those two things aren't necessarily mutually exclusive.

00:34:38.960 --> 00:34:50.480
 But you can just see how it fleshed out in that connections to 35 and across 35 are important.

00:34:50.480 --> 00:35:00.840
 Connections to the rail trail facility were important.

00:35:00.840 --> 00:35:04.160
 Between the dotted and the solid, there's no difference.

00:35:04.160 --> 00:35:11.640
 It was just different people filling that in with their markers. The star there is downtown, just to orient yourself.

00:35:11.640 --> 00:35:18.360
 So there's a lot of interest in McKinney, but it's seen as a barrier and a stressful route.

00:35:18.360 --> 00:35:26.640
 This Woodrow corridor, as far as North-South travel, being able to get along 288.

00:35:26.640 --> 00:35:34.600
 From my perspective, I'd like to keep bicycles off of 288 and use a parallel route, you know.

00:35:34.600 --> 00:35:37.880
 So that's where Mayhill comes in for being useful.

00:35:37.880 --> 00:35:46.200
 And if I don't know what's going to happen, I know that this area is slated for some future development.

00:35:46.200 --> 00:35:54.160
 And that is something that we need to keep our eyes on is finding connections within that area inside of the loop.

00:35:54.160 --> 00:35:59.120
 That's, I mean, a lot of it's just open land right now.

00:35:59.120 --> 00:36:04.080
 But so this is the good feedback that we got from people.

00:36:04.080 --> 00:36:08.640
 And it's fairly consistent with what we're seeing in our plans.

00:36:08.640 --> 00:36:14.080
 I will say I just checked in with our consultant we're working with on the mobility plan.

00:36:14.080 --> 00:36:22.720
 And one of the things that we want to do is in our past plans, I'm going to pull up.

00:36:22.720 --> 00:36:31.040
 In our past plans, we've been using a lot of the shared lane where bicycles and cars are intermingled,

00:36:31.040 --> 00:36:42.400
 shared lane with parking, wide curb lane or urban shoulder where bicycles don't have a delineated designated space.

00:36:42.400 --> 00:36:43.960
 And there's confusion there.

00:36:43.960 --> 00:36:47.960
 I mean, I think it is a step in the right direction and it has been a good step.

00:36:47.960 --> 00:36:56.280
 But in talking with our consultants and so forth, we really want to we want to move this up to the next level of comfort.

00:36:56.280 --> 00:37:08.280
 Going to actual bike lanes or actual barrier bike lanes, protected bike lanes by barriers.

00:37:08.280 --> 00:37:14.040
 Also, we have a lot of these shoulder bike lanes through town, which are bike lanes,

00:37:14.040 --> 00:37:22.600
 but not bike lanes because people are allowed to park in them, which is it's it can be confusing and difficult.

00:37:22.600 --> 00:37:28.000
 You know, if a road has sparse enough parking, then maybe people can get around it.

00:37:28.000 --> 00:37:32.840
 And it is a gesture towards inclusion of cycling as a mode.

00:37:32.840 --> 00:37:35.600
 But we want we want to get away from that in there.

00:37:35.600 --> 00:37:40.480
 So some of the things that they're thinking are looking at a side path on Woodrow.

00:37:40.480 --> 00:37:55.680
 Now, this is all draft thoughts, you know, as part of the plan that trail along the concrete could really be a great connector parallel really to the to the rail trail on McKinney bicycle lanes.

00:37:55.680 --> 00:37:58.600
 But buffered separated something like that.

00:37:58.600 --> 00:38:04.040
 There are widening plans for the eastern parts of McKinney there.

00:38:04.040 --> 00:38:08.280
 And Spencer also Spencer has an opportunity.

00:38:08.280 --> 00:38:16.240
 It's two lanes in each direction currently, but maybe maybe it goes to one in each direction with a center median turn lane or something like that.

00:38:16.240 --> 00:38:19.200
 And that would allow some room for bicycle lanes.

00:38:19.200 --> 00:38:20.880
 So that's that's just some of the things.

00:38:20.880 --> 00:38:24.720
 And this is still very much in the draft, the brainstorm stage and so forth.

00:38:24.720 --> 00:38:30.800
 But just some of the things that we are looking towards with that question.

00:38:30.800 --> 00:38:48.200
 I'm glad to hear you say that, because the one thing that I've heard from the bicycle community and even those who aren't necessarily in the community, but you ride bicycles around town or those who don't and would like to is that they don't feel safe.

00:38:48.200 --> 00:38:55.120
 And having something protected would encourage them to ride bicycles more.

00:38:55.120 --> 00:38:59.560
 So I'm glad to hear the consultants bringing back the suggestions.

00:38:59.560 --> 00:39:05.400
 I feel like anything going forward if we do implement would need to be somewhat protected.

00:39:05.400 --> 00:39:12.440
 If not, we're not really solving any problems in the past.

00:39:12.440 --> 00:39:19.920
 And so I just want to show you quickly a demonstration of this is on Morse.

00:39:19.920 --> 00:39:22.440
 Morse is actually a nice east, west street.

00:39:22.440 --> 00:39:29.520
 And I've used a fair bit on on my bicycle and does have these wide lanes, you know, fairly low traffic volume.

00:39:29.520 --> 00:39:33.440
 Whoops, there we go.

00:39:33.440 --> 00:39:40.760
 But all we have right now are these signs encouraging people to share the world, to be aware of cyclists.

00:39:40.760 --> 00:39:55.080
 But if we could increase the level of protection, put some more pain out there, maybe some barriers, things like that, it would really make it a much more comfortable bicycle facility.

00:39:55.080 --> 00:39:59.520
 So that's generally where we are and where we're going, the direction.

00:39:59.520 --> 00:40:04.560
 I hope I met the intent of your question on the topic.

00:40:04.560 --> 00:40:06.760
 Yeah, you actually know it's going to result in a presentation.

00:40:06.760 --> 00:40:14.600
 Oh, I appreciate your sensitivity to the to the fact that it didn't look like there was a whole lot there.

00:40:14.600 --> 00:40:22.080
 And I appreciate the thought that, you know, that it's going into it now.

00:40:22.080 --> 00:40:27.120
 Other questions or comments?

00:40:27.120 --> 00:40:29.760
 That's one of the bricks.

00:40:29.760 --> 00:40:35.880
 So is there a I'm at a lot, but I drive there and so I'm not the right center.

00:40:35.880 --> 00:40:45.280
 Yes. Yes. Is there a a safe bike plan now from downtown to that center or from?

00:40:45.280 --> 00:40:51.800
 I know that the school's right next to it, but but I'm just wondering if there is a any.

00:40:51.800 --> 00:41:00.320
 Safe bicycle route path to the center currently from in the area.

00:41:00.320 --> 00:41:07.520
 I. I don't think from like from the courthouse to the rec center,

00:41:07.520 --> 00:41:19.280
 I don't think you have bike infrastructure the whole way, but I would recommend.

00:41:19.280 --> 00:41:23.120
 John Hickory there. Yeah, you go behind the police station.

00:41:23.120 --> 00:41:26.960
 Yeah, I can pull up the map.

00:41:26.960 --> 00:41:31.920
 So and it may be just something for a different, you know, for the mobility discussion.

00:41:31.920 --> 00:41:39.120
 It's just that I know that lots of kids in the neighborhood from all around walk there to to play,

00:41:39.120 --> 00:41:47.440
 you know, basketball or after school to use that facility for several things and either walk or bike.

00:41:47.440 --> 00:41:54.240
 And so. It just this presentation just made me start thinking,

00:41:54.240 --> 00:42:00.720
 well, is there anything safe right now, a route that we could recommend or.

00:42:00.720 --> 00:42:05.280
 Have them use. Yeah, I have gone that way and done that.

00:42:05.280 --> 00:42:07.360
 My recommendation would be Hickory.

00:42:07.360 --> 00:42:14.560
 You do have protected lanes back over here and then it gets fairly quiet behind

00:42:14.560 --> 00:42:20.240
 between the police department and the downtown transit center gets quieter.

00:42:20.240 --> 00:42:26.160
 And you can make the right here just before the court and go straight into it.

00:42:26.160 --> 00:42:30.240
 You don't have a protected land along here, though, not currently.

00:42:30.240 --> 00:42:35.440
 But but that is one thing that we are absolutely looking at as part of the mobility plan is

00:42:35.440 --> 00:42:40.720
 what are the nodes that people are trying to get to and from elementary schools, rec centers,

00:42:40.720 --> 00:42:46.640
 downtown transit center and how do we connect those? OK, thank you.

00:42:46.640 --> 00:42:52.320
 He mentioned that there are certain routes that are planned or sort of on the map for Cog and make.

00:42:52.320 --> 00:43:02.640
 Yeah, make them eligible for funding. So what's the process for getting the funding?

00:43:02.640 --> 00:43:10.640
 So typically, so for funding by bicycle, I don't know if you heard the side comment that we wrapped up all those points for all those great.

00:43:10.640 --> 00:43:24.720
 Projects. Correct. So there are a couple different things that points that we're racking up would be good match from the city side for some of these infrastructure projects for the upcoming bond election.

00:43:24.720 --> 00:43:39.520
 That's that's our plan. Since it's early on, we're already starting that conversation with Cog, saying if if we get the bond passed and if there is interest in funding, some of those are match would be the points that we racked up.

00:43:39.520 --> 00:43:55.200
 As far as the bicycle infrastructure every year, every couple of years, depending on the frequency, they cog typically issues what is called set aside that is active transportation dollars for bicycle and pedestrian facilities.

00:43:55.200 --> 00:44:04.320
 So it's multi-use trails. We've done one trail in the city on the north side by North Lakes Park and I'm sorry, by the Evers Park.

00:44:04.320 --> 00:44:13.840
 It connects Evers Park and North Nikosha along Nikosha. We've already done that. Currently we have two projects that are funded through to set aside monies.

00:44:13.840 --> 00:44:24.960
 One is the multi-use trail on sick more that connects the train station all the way to and then there is another one.

00:44:24.960 --> 00:44:41.440
 It's the other one. I forget the other one was one more to set aside. But what would happen is once we move forward to design and construction of the current funding that we have for the projects, then we can apply for another one, another grant.

00:44:41.440 --> 00:44:49.560
 So every year we're trying what projects we can move forward. I think there is a little lag right now because we're going through our mobility plan update.

00:44:49.560 --> 00:45:01.520
 Once we have a solid plan, then next year we can definitely go and go ahead and say, hey, this is part of our plan and this is what we need funding, we really see a need in this area.

00:45:01.520 --> 00:45:09.320
 I think it was CMAC, the other one, isn't it? CMAC program, I think, you know, federal funding program.

00:45:09.320 --> 00:45:11.480
 Thank you. Anything else?

00:45:11.480 --> 00:45:18.000
 Well, since you brought it up, what is the status of the sick more multi-use path?

00:45:18.000 --> 00:45:21.120
 We're still waiting on text out to kickstart the project.

00:45:21.120 --> 00:45:29.600
 So I did have a phone call with them last week. The ball is in their court to give us the notice to proceed.

00:45:29.600 --> 00:45:36.880
 They have received the the green light from FHWA that we were waiting for.

00:45:36.880 --> 00:45:41.440
 So that has gone to them. And I did had a phone call with them last week.

00:45:41.440 --> 00:45:48.000
 And it's just a matter of we can ping again, but it is up to them to contact us and say you're ready.

00:45:48.000 --> 00:45:54.040
 OK. I just want to make sure that we didn't end up in a situation where we're getting close to the funds expiring.

00:45:54.040 --> 00:46:02.120
 No, no, we're working with COG. We every TIP mod that comes up, I think it's quarterly, we are in touch with them.

00:46:02.120 --> 00:46:08.560
 We update our schedule based on what's happening with text out and the way they're managing this project.

00:46:08.560 --> 00:46:12.360
 The issue with this particular project is all the dollars are federal dollars.

00:46:12.360 --> 00:46:18.360
 That means we can't really kickstart any of the design or anything without approval else.

00:46:18.360 --> 00:46:24.920
 We won't get our reimbursements. We won't get the money reimbursed through the federal dollars.

00:46:24.920 --> 00:46:27.480
 That's my breaks. Just a question.

00:46:27.480 --> 00:46:36.560
 Why you had the map that the COG bicycle and it's not necessarily in this area, but I just I really wasn't aware of that map.

00:46:36.560 --> 00:46:38.960
 So I'm wondering if Mingo is on that.

00:46:38.960 --> 00:46:44.160
 Is this do they consider that a I can follow the link?

00:46:44.160 --> 00:46:48.120
 Well, you can just get I was just curious. I can follow the link myself.

00:46:48.120 --> 00:46:53.280
 And look, I didn't I just wanted to ask if you knew.

00:46:53.280 --> 00:46:59.960
 Thank you. I believe it is OK.

00:46:59.960 --> 00:47:07.960
 And thank you for showing us that map. I hadn't seen it before.

00:47:07.960 --> 00:47:30.800
 Here it comes.

00:47:30.800 --> 00:47:33.960
 Well, there you go. You have the green.

00:47:33.960 --> 00:47:44.520
 OK, so regional velo web, that's actually a very high priority, important infrastructure there.

00:47:44.520 --> 00:47:49.640
 And it's part of the velo web. Off Street planned as well.

00:47:49.640 --> 00:47:52.960
 So that would be a side path, not on the street, but next to it.

00:47:52.960 --> 00:47:58.040
 It's a high priority for twenty forty five.

00:47:58.040 --> 00:48:04.120
 It'll come sooner than we know. Thank you for checking.

00:48:04.120 --> 00:48:19.480
 I think what happens is if it's on the cog velo web, that gives us higher points when we go for some of the federal dollars saying that this is a regional connection for active transportation, not just a local little bike trail.

00:48:19.480 --> 00:48:24.920
 So that would definitely put us in a better shape if we ask for funding.

00:48:24.920 --> 00:48:31.000
 Great. Thank you very much. Close that item then.

00:48:31.000 --> 00:48:39.880
 And I just noticed, I think what you're trying to point out to me before, John, that it was not only are we not sketching around, but it was originally listed a C B.

00:48:39.880 --> 00:48:45.920
 So I think we're successfully eluding anybody trying to follow us.

00:48:45.920 --> 00:48:52.640
 And let's let's move on to the second item, which we're covering fourth, which is item C.

00:48:52.640 --> 00:48:58.640
 Receive a report and hold a discussion regarding updates from D.C.T.A.

00:48:58.640 --> 00:49:00.720
 Absolutely. Please. Thank you for coming.

00:49:00.720 --> 00:49:05.240
 I make sure your mic is on the little yes.

00:49:05.240 --> 00:49:06.840
 All right. Thank you.

00:49:06.840 --> 00:49:12.000
 My name is Michelle Boomer, and I'm the vice president of operations for the Ditton County Transportation Authority.

00:49:12.000 --> 00:49:15.320
 So I oversee all the rail and bus service.

00:49:15.320 --> 00:49:20.120
 So a really quick update today, I just wanted to give you a heads up.

00:49:20.120 --> 00:49:23.160
 You're probably aware we've had some changes on our board.

00:49:23.160 --> 00:49:27.640
 Our board is now one hundred percent seated seated.

00:49:27.640 --> 00:49:32.160
 The representative is Mayor Chris Watts, the council member.

00:49:32.160 --> 00:49:37.080
 Excuse me. Yeah. This little signal means that your voice isn't going right into the mic.

00:49:37.080 --> 00:49:41.160
 So is the green light on? Yeah, John, you want to be tech support?

00:49:41.160 --> 00:49:45.880
 Oh, that was on. Sorry. OK.

00:49:45.880 --> 00:49:53.800
 For Louisville, council member T.J. Gilmore is the representative and Claire Powell is the alternate alternate.

00:49:53.800 --> 00:49:58.560
 Diane Costas is from Highland Village. She is also the chair of the committee.

00:49:58.560 --> 00:50:01.960
 And at large, we have Sam Burke and Paul Christina.

00:50:01.960 --> 00:50:08.120
 Oops. Sorry. Randall Christman, Paul Christina and Shannon Joskey are the two alternates for Denton County.

00:50:08.120 --> 00:50:11.680
 At the next board meeting, which is on the 26th, they'll be reviewing the bylaws.

00:50:11.680 --> 00:50:17.200
 We'll need to change the DCTA bylaws in order to accommodate the new board structure.

00:50:17.200 --> 00:50:21.520
 And we'll also be asking the board to approve our twenty twenty budget.

00:50:21.520 --> 00:50:36.000
 One of the items that was added to the budget at the last meeting was the seventy seven thousand dollar request from the city of Denton to provide shuttle service from senior King Outreach Center to our daily bread, starting in the beginning of January twenty twenty.

00:50:36.000 --> 00:50:44.280
 Just want to let you know that at your meeting next Tuesday, our CEO Raymond Suarez will be providing a presentation.

00:50:44.280 --> 00:50:51.280
 Just want to make you aware of that. So if there's any questions I can't answer, I'll give him a heads up and he'll be able to answer them then.

00:50:51.280 --> 00:50:59.680
 We just went through August service changes. So was it two Mondays? Two Mondays ago, August 26th, we implemented some service changes.

00:50:59.680 --> 00:51:13.840
 Those main changes were around the train. And so we added midday service on the train, went to 30 minute headways or consistent service every 30 minutes, except for a one hour period in the middle of the day due to shift change.

00:51:13.840 --> 00:51:19.440
 We just could not accommodate that 30 minutes throughout the entire day.

00:51:19.440 --> 00:51:29.640
 And then we had to adjust the schedule to allow for implementation of positive train control and a positive train controller. PTC is a federal required safety mandate.

00:51:29.640 --> 00:51:34.920
 And so we're currently operating trains in what we call revenue service demonstration.

00:51:34.920 --> 00:51:40.720
 So we're testing PTC to make sure that it works and then we'll go 100 percent live.

00:51:40.720 --> 00:51:48.360
 And then as a result of those changes to the train schedule, we obviously had to change some of the bus schedules in order to make sure that we could still meet the train.

00:51:48.360 --> 00:51:58.440
 And so there were changes to the Denton Connect, Lewisville Connect, Thailand Village, as well as the UNT routes that pulls off of one of the train stations.

00:51:58.440 --> 00:52:11.320
 Some other things we're working on. There were two locations identified in the trail safety study, as well as the recent FRA Federal Railroad Administration audit at Colorado and Brinker at those two railroad crossings.

00:52:11.320 --> 00:52:15.840
 I did want to thank the city. It's a joint partnership between the city and DCTA.

00:52:15.840 --> 00:52:22.640
 The city is taking care of the striping and the signage and DCTA is taking care of the curb cuts at that location.

00:52:22.640 --> 00:52:27.160
 And so with that cooperation, we'll get that done a little bit quicker.

00:52:27.160 --> 00:52:32.120
 And then coming up on the horizon is the 2020 service changes.

00:52:32.120 --> 00:52:48.360
 I'm not sure how much you're aware of DCTA has issued a request for proposals for mobility as a service or what's called MAS services to have a bunch of mobility as a service providers in our two blocks that we can use.

00:52:48.360 --> 00:52:56.800
 And so we're looking at how do we incorporate mobility as a service into our existing service or more transition from a traditional fixed route system,

00:52:56.800 --> 00:53:06.800
 which is what we currently have in Denton, Louisville and Highland Village to something that incorporates a hybrid of fixed route where you have that density and we can increase the frequency.

00:53:06.800 --> 00:53:15.320
 And then on those outskirts of the area that we don't currently serve or we currently serve, but at not very high densities, could we implement mobility on demand service?

00:53:15.320 --> 00:53:24.720
 And so we're working with HDR consulting company to help us look at all of that through our entire service area and determine how best to implement that.

00:53:24.720 --> 00:53:28.080
 It will most likely be a phased approach.

00:53:28.080 --> 00:53:34.000
 We when we implemented that didn't enterprise airport zone, it was to a new area that wasn't previously served.

00:53:34.000 --> 00:53:37.600
 So the transition was a little different when we did it in Louisville.

00:53:37.600 --> 00:53:43.680
 It was the Louisville Lakeway zone replaced a portion of an existing fixed route.

00:53:43.680 --> 00:53:51.120
 And so there was a little bit of transition for those individuals that were using the fixed route system to learn how to use the on demand system.

00:53:51.120 --> 00:53:59.920
 And so we wouldn't want to go 100% on demand in Denton or Louisville all at one time because that would be a lot of change for folks.

00:53:59.920 --> 00:54:02.000
 And we're still trying to figure out how we get over that.

00:54:02.000 --> 00:54:06.200
 If you have a fixed route, you just stand at the stop and eventually a bus will come by.

00:54:06.200 --> 00:54:08.600
 But on on demand, you can stand at a stop.

00:54:08.600 --> 00:54:15.040
 And unless you call either DCTA to request the trip or you do it via the app, the bus will never come.

00:54:15.040 --> 00:54:20.800
 So we're trying to figure out how we can overcome that so we don't have individuals standing at the stop waiting for a bus.

00:54:20.800 --> 00:54:29.600
 And so we're looking to implement that service and combining that with what Raymond is calling our our first year was the year of change.

00:54:29.600 --> 00:54:32.720
 And we joke we didn't realize how much change we would see.

00:54:32.720 --> 00:54:35.400
 But the second year is the year of transition.

00:54:35.400 --> 00:54:46.040
 And we'll be bringing in some consultants to assist DCTA in figuring out how we can work better, basically how we can work smarter, not harder.

00:54:46.040 --> 00:54:54.880
 And we'll work with those transition consultants as well as HGR to determine how best to implement that new hybrid service going forward.

00:54:54.880 --> 00:54:56.800
 Excuse me. Just had a thought.

00:54:56.800 --> 00:55:00.480
 This might be technologically impossible or challenging.

00:55:00.480 --> 00:55:04.360
 But I wonder if there might be something like a call button at the stop.

00:55:04.360 --> 00:55:06.560
 That is one of the things we're looking at.

00:55:06.560 --> 00:55:11.600
 The question becomes is how many because right now we have over five hundred stops.

00:55:11.600 --> 00:55:14.520
 And can we can we put call buttons at every stop?

00:55:14.520 --> 00:55:18.960
 And then if we put one, our people just going to be pressing it and not really so.

00:55:18.960 --> 00:55:20.680
 But it is one of the options we're looking at.

00:55:20.680 --> 00:55:24.480
 And that's a testable proposition to see if they abuse it.

00:55:24.480 --> 00:55:33.040
 Yeah. And one of the question on that years ago, you had a program called Dial-A-Ride.

00:55:33.040 --> 00:55:36.720
 Yes. When you pull out of neighborhoods and went to the main.

00:55:36.720 --> 00:55:42.800
 This was up on university for people who were would have to cross a major thoroughfare like university.

00:55:42.800 --> 00:55:47.200
 They could call in and a car would come pick them up and drop them off at the bus stop.

00:55:47.200 --> 00:55:50.480
 Is that something that you all are that's similar to what we're looking at?

00:55:50.480 --> 00:55:58.520
 So just off the top of my head, you know, we we might want to run fixed routes down east, west, north, south.

00:55:58.520 --> 00:56:10.720
 But then from there have zones and then within that zones like neighborhood zones that we would take you to the closest fixed route stop or just take you directly to that location depending on where it was.

00:56:10.720 --> 00:56:19.960
 And so that's really what we're working with the consultants to determine is what's the best way to overlay the on demand service on top of fixed route.

00:56:19.960 --> 00:56:26.480
 So when you say overlay, in other words, it would necessarily replace it would be a supplement.

00:56:26.480 --> 00:56:35.360
 Correct. I think it makes it wouldn't make sense to completely take away fixed route because we have some routes seven, eight, five, six that have very high ridership.

00:56:35.360 --> 00:56:46.880
 And if you were to try to transition all those trips onto a smaller vehicle, we would need a lot more vehicles and so trying to find the most efficient way to serve the most people.

00:56:46.880 --> 00:57:00.360
 And so if you have those routes that you know are sort of your spines, it's best to run fixed route down those and then you can increase the frequency because right now our frequency is 30 minutes during peak in 30 minutes or 60 minutes and off peak.

00:57:00.360 --> 00:57:08.880
 If we can get that down to say 15, 20 minutes, that's more attractive to folks and then we can get you certain, you know, to a certain point.

00:57:08.880 --> 00:57:13.160
 And then from there you would on demand to your direct location.

00:57:13.160 --> 00:57:14.920
 What is the average weight now?

00:57:14.920 --> 00:57:16.520
 Is that something that that you know?

00:57:16.520 --> 00:57:26.080
 I mean, I understand the frequency, but in terms of rider behavior, what is the average weight they experience on the fixed routes?

00:57:26.080 --> 00:57:28.360
 It's really based on the frequency.

00:57:28.360 --> 00:57:41.640
 So, I mean, if I know the bus comes every hour on the hour or every hour and then 30 minutes, it just depends if I we recommend people get to the stop at a minimum of five minutes before the bus is scheduled to be there.

00:57:41.640 --> 00:57:48.840
 So they would be waiting five minutes and what would the typical wait time be for mobility as a service?

00:57:48.840 --> 00:58:03.680
 We currently in didn't airport zone, I don't believe the weights more than 10 minutes and then in Lewisville, we currently have it set if it goes over 15, we send another vehicle out, but we constantly monitor it to see where we are.

00:58:03.680 --> 00:58:08.040
 And most times it's not more than five to five to seven minutes.

00:58:08.040 --> 00:58:13.800
 So would the goal be to sort of engineer it to be comparable to what the current wait time is?

00:58:13.800 --> 00:58:16.800
 We'll have to see how many vehicles that requires.

00:58:16.800 --> 00:58:21.120
 I'm imagining somewhere between a 10 and a 15 minute wait.

00:58:21.120 --> 00:58:24.600
 We're also looking at options.

00:58:24.600 --> 00:58:41.200
 When we did Lewisville, we looked at an option with lift where if the weight was longer than X amount of time and you can set whatever amount of time that is, you can say if it's more than 10 minutes or more than 20 minutes or more than 30 minutes, that trip would automatically push to lift and they would they would respond.

00:58:41.200 --> 00:59:04.760
 So that's part of the issue that we'll be working through with the consultants is we're providing them with all of our ridership information, origins, destinations, time of day, loads and then trying to figure out, okay, based on that, if we were to go to a on demand service instead of the X number of big buses, we have how many smaller buses would we need and what would that cost?

00:59:04.760 --> 00:59:15.320
 I'd certainly be interested to know what sort of what the system engineering would result in if it were designed to create more convenience, not just less cost.

00:59:15.320 --> 00:59:18.960
 Okay.

00:59:18.960 --> 00:59:22.480
 And what we'll probably have the consultants do is work up multiple scenarios.

00:59:22.480 --> 00:59:34.720
 You know, if it's a 20 minute wait, this is how many vehicles it would be and this would be the cost if it was a 15 minute, et cetera, and then take that to the board and allow the board to make that decision is where do they want to balance?

00:59:34.720 --> 01:00:01.000
 Convenience or wait time with cost, but yeah, obviously it's a trade off and I notice you didn't mention routes one, two and three with the vision, you know, that you anticipate being overlaid there as well or or you're looking at a different approach, potentially taking portions of those routes away and putting on demand in place of it.

01:00:01.000 --> 01:00:08.840
 And so they're sort of fixed route hybrid and then places where they'll just be on demand service.

01:00:08.840 --> 01:00:21.440
 There won't be any fixed route service that would certainly increase my interest in increasing the convenience before you make it for you reduce the convenience of mass transit.

01:00:21.440 --> 01:00:27.120
 One of the other things that on demand service will allow us to do is expand beyond our existing service areas.

01:00:27.120 --> 01:00:41.000
 So there are portions of the city of Denton that are currently not served and by doing on demand that allow us to serve a larger portion of that instead of sending a fixed route vehicle out.

01:00:41.000 --> 01:00:47.200
 Other questions? Actually, I sort of paused you for questions, you might have had more to share.

01:00:47.200 --> 01:00:50.880
 I was done. We're good.

01:00:50.880 --> 01:00:52.920
 Thank you very much for coming in and updating us.

01:00:52.920 --> 01:01:00.280
 Thank you. OK, are we in the hopscotch game now?

01:01:00.280 --> 01:01:07.120
 So, all right, we're ready now to move to item D, which we're taking up fifth.

01:01:07.120 --> 01:01:19.400
 Receive a report and hold the discussion regarding the city of Denton mobility plan work completed in future task items.

01:01:19.400 --> 01:01:25.080
 Good morning, everyone. I'm Ella Mutul, traffic engineer with the city.

01:01:25.080 --> 01:01:32.720
 So I'm here today to share what has been accomplished so far and where we're headed with the mobility plan.

01:01:32.720 --> 01:01:40.600
 So from the last meeting, we did update the survey to rephrase some of the questions based on your feedback.

01:01:40.600 --> 01:01:47.480
 So we did do that. We held a third public meeting on August 22nd, further south of the city.

01:01:47.480 --> 01:01:52.440
 It was a great turnout. We had about 50 attendees.

01:01:52.440 --> 01:01:58.520
 The consultant has developed the draft maps for the thoroughfare, the bike and the pedestrian.

01:01:58.520 --> 01:02:02.240
 We had a staff initial review.

01:02:02.240 --> 01:02:16.040
 So the engineering transportation engineering division had a one on one with consultants to have an initial look at the maps on this previous Wednesday.

01:02:16.040 --> 01:02:20.960
 And I wanted to share preliminary preliminary survey results.

01:02:20.960 --> 01:02:25.800
 As of August 29th, we had two hundred and twenty one surveys.

01:02:25.800 --> 01:02:32.840
 I just put a screenshot of some of the questions and answers what I thought were interesting.

01:02:32.840 --> 01:02:36.560
 So the first question is, how often do you travel by?

01:02:36.560 --> 01:02:44.520
 And there's several options. Vehicle, walking, bicycle, of course, the primary answer for.

01:02:44.520 --> 01:02:48.760
 The three or more times per week is vehicle.

01:02:48.760 --> 01:03:00.400
 What I found interesting was, well, unfortunately, the public transportation was the top option for never.

01:03:00.400 --> 01:03:07.000
 So I think we can definitely improve on that as a city wide.

01:03:07.000 --> 01:03:12.440
 Question eight, please indicate how much you agree or disagree with the following statements.

01:03:12.440 --> 01:03:23.440
 The first question is, I would use my vehicle less if taking the bus, walking or biking became more convenient and, of course, just interject to come in.

01:03:23.440 --> 01:03:26.680
 Yes. Just imagining a possible future.

01:03:26.680 --> 01:03:34.520
 If I knew the bus stop right outside my house, if I knew I could hit a call button and get a ride within five minutes, I'd probably take it.

01:03:34.520 --> 01:03:42.920
 Right. I know it would be great. No pressure.

01:03:42.920 --> 01:03:48.240
 So strongly agree if it became more convenient.

01:03:48.240 --> 01:03:55.040
 Question number five was, how often do you use technology to plan your daily trips like Waze, GPS, go pass?

01:03:55.040 --> 01:04:02.440
 And I was pleasantly surprised that forty percent said all of the time, thirty five percent every now and then.

01:04:02.440 --> 01:04:13.360
 So it's great that we're really using Waze and we're pushing all this technology to be used online as the citizens commute around the city.

01:04:13.360 --> 01:04:18.000
 So how would you describe the quality of the current roadway system in Denton?

01:04:18.000 --> 01:04:30.960
 The top two responses was existing roads need to be better maintained and congested roads need to be widened.

01:04:30.960 --> 01:04:36.480
 What are the things that prevent you from bicycling and did you want to say pretense?

01:04:36.480 --> 01:04:42.520
 Oh, I was wondering if that was like a half a response on everything is fine.

01:04:42.520 --> 01:04:46.600
 The little green line on that. Everything.

01:04:46.600 --> 01:04:51.960
 This is also only two hundred. We're expecting more responses.

01:04:51.960 --> 01:04:59.560
 It's kind of interesting. Like, it's it should we interpret when we see that it's below 50 percent say congested roadways need to be widened.

01:04:59.560 --> 01:05:04.480
 Does that mean a majority did not feel congested roadways need to be widened?

01:05:04.480 --> 01:05:10.800
 You kind of have to look at it overall because you were able to select all that you felt.

01:05:10.800 --> 01:05:16.480
 You were able to select each one if you wanted to. So it's just overall ratio.

01:05:16.480 --> 01:05:20.120
 Clearly, existing roads need to be better maintained.

01:05:20.120 --> 01:05:23.240
 Yeah, and we're working on it. We're working on it very hard.

01:05:23.240 --> 01:05:27.120
 Which means we need more construction. That's what I heard from that.

01:05:27.120 --> 01:05:33.000
 I thought you might hear that or traffic control plans. Yes.

01:05:33.000 --> 01:05:35.600
 I should give two seconds for reactions.

01:05:35.600 --> 01:05:38.680
 What are the things that prevent you from bicycling and Denton?

01:05:38.680 --> 01:05:51.360
 And it was the main two were not enough bikeways and bikeways do not feel safe or comfortable, which kind of really marks message earlier.

01:05:51.360 --> 01:05:54.440
 What are the things that prevent you from walking in Denton?

01:05:54.440 --> 01:05:58.280
 This one had kind of three that stood out.

01:05:58.280 --> 01:06:00.200
 Sidewalks are not connected.

01:06:00.200 --> 01:06:05.120
 Destinations are too far and sidewalks are in poor condition.

01:06:05.120 --> 01:06:10.680
 And the fourth one was weather, but yeah, we have no say in weather.

01:06:10.680 --> 01:06:14.880
 If you had to focus somewhere, it would be sidewalks are not connected, right?

01:06:14.880 --> 01:06:18.080
 Right. And that's moving the destinations closer to each other.

01:06:18.080 --> 01:06:26.960
 Yes, connectivity. And we're definitely looking at that and figuring out where all the gaps are and prioritizing them.

01:06:26.960 --> 01:06:34.200
 Which improvements would you make? Which improvements would make you more likely to walk around the city?

01:06:34.200 --> 01:06:47.960
 And the top three, which we are definitely aware of and working towards is better lighting, more sidewalks, better connectivity, more landscaping, including trees for shade.

01:06:47.960 --> 01:06:50.600
 And where are we headed?

01:06:50.600 --> 01:07:07.760
 So the plan is to do a final push and send, I guess, an advertisement in the utility bill to have all the residents go out there, take the survey that will be sent out soon, I believe this week or next week.

01:07:07.760 --> 01:07:15.320
 And we will be closing the survey early October, so it'll be open the rest of the month.

01:07:15.320 --> 01:07:23.200
 And we are, as I mentioned, we are reviewing the draft maps.

01:07:23.200 --> 01:07:28.200
 We already did the internal one and then we will have the technical stakeholders.

01:07:28.200 --> 01:07:36.360
 We have a meeting set this Thursday, so we'll be presenting that map to them and asking for feedback.

01:07:36.360 --> 01:07:57.760
 We are looking, excuse me, the consultant is working on the model, they're going to be looking at one way versus two way, the general concept of the city as a whole and seeing how the change would impact mobility near it and as a region as a whole.

01:07:57.760 --> 01:08:12.160
 Another thing they're looking at as part of the mobility plan is TWU has requested us to look at a potential Bell Avenue closure from Chapel to college.

01:08:12.160 --> 01:08:18.920
 So they're looking at that option, how it's going to affect adjacent north-south connectivity.

01:08:18.920 --> 01:08:21.560
 >> I'm sorry, who's requesting we look at Bell Avenue?

01:08:21.560 --> 01:08:22.280
 >> TWU.

01:08:22.280 --> 01:08:23.040
 >> Oh, okay.

01:08:23.040 --> 01:08:24.080
 >> Yes, the university.

01:08:24.080 --> 01:08:25.080
 >> Council hasn't asked for that.

01:08:25.080 --> 01:08:25.840
 >> Yes.

01:08:25.840 --> 01:08:28.640
 >> I don't recall us, we haven't had a vote on that or anything.

01:08:28.640 --> 01:08:31.640
 >> No.

01:08:31.640 --> 01:08:46.680
 >> You mentioned on the survey putting it out in the utility bills, are we able to get a email list from the utility company for those that are on paper lists and/or auto pay that do not open up a utility bill?

01:08:46.680 --> 01:08:47.560
 >> That's a good question.

01:08:47.560 --> 01:08:54.920
 I know we do have email groups, but I don't think it's related to the utility bills.

01:08:54.920 --> 01:08:58.000
 >> We'll definitely work with the public information office.

01:08:58.000 --> 01:09:08.840
 I think they have good contact for most of the, and then we can also work with customer service where they actually have information of who is paying what way.

01:09:08.840 --> 01:09:14.720
 Are they receiving the bill?

01:09:14.720 --> 01:09:15.960
 >> Was the light coming on?

01:09:15.960 --> 01:09:23.520
 Okay, well, and I just say that because I'm paperless, I'm on auto pay, I don't remember the last time I've opened up a utility bill.

01:09:23.520 --> 01:09:29.600
 So it's, yeah, if it's opened, it's opened a couple months later to put it into QuickBooks, and that's it.

01:09:29.600 --> 01:09:38.160
 >> Yes, Stephanie mentioned there's, in the list, there's 55,000, so yes, it's a portion of all residents.

01:09:38.160 --> 01:09:43.920
 And all of this, basically, all the analysis, we're refining the maps.

01:09:43.920 --> 01:09:54.560
 And we will be presenting the analysis for the one-way bell and the draft maps to council at a workshop on October 24th.

01:09:54.560 --> 01:09:57.560
 I believe they're aware of it.

01:09:57.560 --> 01:09:58.880
 >> To come forward, yes.

01:09:58.880 --> 01:10:07.720
 >> Yes. >> We're at least planning at this point that October 24th we'll have some bases of discussing one-way versus two-way.

01:10:07.720 --> 01:10:11.800
 And some of the other layout, big picture layouts of the map.

01:10:11.800 --> 01:10:17.720
 One of the things that will be looked at is also capacity requirements on Carol.

01:10:17.720 --> 01:10:24.160
 I think there are a couple of items on the matrix that talk about can we do road diet on Carol and then one-way, two-way.

01:10:24.160 --> 01:10:29.520
 So both those items will be covered as part of that work session item in October.

01:10:29.520 --> 01:10:30.920
 >> Councilmember Briggs.

01:10:30.920 --> 01:10:38.240
 >> Yeah, just to, while we're on this item, I'm sure you guys are aware that the mobility plan update was a council priority that we discussed.

01:10:38.240 --> 01:10:47.040
 So I didn't know if this was going to, if that affects the timeline at all or if it's pretty much the same or if it kind of expedites it.

01:10:47.040 --> 01:10:52.160
 >> So, we are planning on getting substantial at the end of this year, right?

01:10:52.160 --> 01:10:53.680
 The mobility plan?

01:10:53.680 --> 01:10:54.320
 >> A draft.

01:10:54.320 --> 01:10:55.480
 >> The draft mobility plan.

01:10:55.480 --> 01:10:58.160
 Yeah, we're planning on drafting it by the end of the year.

01:10:58.160 --> 01:11:05.160
 And originally we had a 12-month timeline on it and we kicked out the project at the end of May.

01:11:05.160 --> 01:11:11.080
 So it was supposed to go on to next May but we have understood that it is a priority.

01:11:11.080 --> 01:11:15.840
 So we've asked the consultant to cut down the time and they're wrapping up the first draft by end of the year.

01:11:15.840 --> 01:11:22.720
 Of course, it'll go back to public hearings and council early next year as well but we want to make sure that we have a draft ready.

01:11:22.720 --> 01:11:26.320
 And we're pushing the consultant as soon as we can.

01:11:26.320 --> 01:11:26.880
 >> Thank you.

01:11:26.880 --> 01:11:28.400
 >> As fast as we can.

01:11:28.400 --> 01:11:38.160
 >> On the one-way, two-way thing, it might make sense to look at it kind of in a multidisciplinary way with economic development.

01:11:38.160 --> 01:11:53.800
 Because I hear persistently, particularly from one member of the public, but citing supposedly many studies that there's a mobility aspect and there's also a kind of what promotes commerce aspect.

01:11:53.800 --> 01:12:01.800
 So that might affect, you know, which you wait, how might affect where you would consider one-way, two-way.

01:12:01.800 --> 01:12:02.200
 >> Correct.

01:12:02.200 --> 01:12:09.760
 So the way we're going to present the one-way, two-way concept is, yes, we're going to look at the mobility aspect of it.

01:12:09.760 --> 01:12:18.480
 But on the same side, we're going to look at, you know, two-way streets and more exposure as far as traffic or even the parking components.

01:12:18.480 --> 01:12:26.640
 So they're going to look at pros and cons, both mobility-wise as well as economic-wise as far as businesses.

01:12:26.640 --> 01:12:27.520
 >> Council Member Briggs.

01:12:27.520 --> 01:12:31.200
 >> In the mobility, I assume it will, you'll discuss speeding?

01:12:31.200 --> 01:12:32.160
 >> Correct.

01:12:32.160 --> 01:12:43.640
 >> Because, like, Locust or Elm, I sit inside a building and I look out and people, it feels like they're going like 50 miles an hour down the street because it's the one-way.

01:12:43.640 --> 01:12:47.640
 So I don't know if you have two-way, if that discourages any type of-

01:12:47.640 --> 01:12:54.680
 >> Yeah, I mean, two-way, we can definitely see that opposing traffic will have that effect and reduce the speeds.

01:12:54.680 --> 01:13:00.880
 We'll look at all the options that are coming online for Locust and Elm as well as Hickory now.

01:13:00.880 --> 01:13:04.760
 So it's overall, throughout the city, it's one-way versus two-way.

01:13:04.760 --> 01:13:05.240
 >> Oh, okay.

01:13:05.240 --> 01:13:06.480
 So just an overall concept?

01:13:06.480 --> 01:13:07.640
 >> Overall concept.

01:13:07.640 --> 01:13:08.360
 >> Gotcha.

01:13:08.360 --> 01:13:09.760
 >> What happens?

01:13:09.760 --> 01:13:10.480
 >> Okay, thank you.

01:13:10.480 --> 01:13:17.320
 >> When I did a ride along with the police for an evening shift, there's a spot along a one-way street.

01:13:17.320 --> 01:13:25.320
 I won't divulge his spot where, you know, we were able to place bets on how brief a time it would take for him to catch a speeder.

01:13:25.320 --> 01:13:29.760
 So those one-ways are a good revenue generator, one way to look at it.

01:13:29.760 --> 01:13:31.160
 >> So that's the economic side?

01:13:31.160 --> 01:13:34.160
 >> Yeah, yeah, so there's that aspect.

01:13:34.160 --> 01:13:43.120
 While we have our representation from DCTA, how does mass transit fit into the mobility plan?

01:13:43.120 --> 01:13:46.040
 Is that part of the picture?

01:13:46.040 --> 01:13:55.120
 >> It is, I mean, primarily it's more on the lines of accessibility for access to a location.

01:13:55.120 --> 01:13:57.360
 If it's one way, you have to go around the block.

01:13:57.360 --> 01:13:59.080
 Two-way, it's direct access.

01:13:59.080 --> 01:14:09.520
 But at the same time, if we're reducing, if we're going from one-way to two-way, the available widths and the intersections, it becomes narrow for buses to maneuver.

01:14:09.520 --> 01:14:17.160
 So there are a couple aspects to it, and yeah, definitely DCTA will be,

01:14:17.160 --> 01:14:22.920
 once we decide or once council gives us a go and no go on one-way versus two-way,

01:14:22.920 --> 01:14:27.240
 we'll get them in the room and, I mean, help them plan their routes.

01:14:27.240 --> 01:14:34.440
 >> And then I also wonder if you want to comment on how our vision for

01:14:36.920 --> 01:14:39.720
 accessibility for disabled people fits into mobility planning?

01:14:39.720 --> 01:14:54.360
 >> Okay, so the question was, how does accessibility for the disabled fit into the mobility?

01:14:54.360 --> 01:14:59.440
 >> Yeah, or vision for achieving accessibility?

01:14:59.440 --> 01:15:03.120
 >> Yeah, well, we have two aspects of that.

01:15:03.120 --> 01:15:09.640
 So the ADA transition plan, which the city has been working on.

01:15:09.640 --> 01:15:16.080
 We, just this past week, got all of the draft delivered to us for our review.

01:15:16.080 --> 01:15:20.760
 We are going to be going over it with the committee on persons with disabilities next week.

01:15:20.760 --> 01:15:23.600
 I think that's Thursday the 19th next week.

01:15:23.600 --> 01:15:29.120
 And yes, we're including ADA and

01:15:29.120 --> 01:15:34.000
 accessibility really under the pedestrian component of the mobility plan.

01:15:34.000 --> 01:15:38.120
 But it's absolutely there, and yeah.

01:15:38.120 --> 01:15:41.440
 >> So moving forward, all our facilities are ADA compliant.

01:15:41.440 --> 01:15:47.120
 It's just getting everything that was before an older infrastructure in compliance.

01:15:47.120 --> 01:15:53.040
 And that's part of what the ADA transition plan is going to do is identify the infrastructure and

01:15:53.040 --> 01:15:57.160
 plan it out in the next 15, 20, 30 years, depending on the funding.

01:15:57.160 --> 01:16:01.980
 How do we go about fixing what's existing that's not compliant?

01:16:01.980 --> 01:16:04.320
 >> Thank you, any other questions?

01:16:04.320 --> 01:16:05.520
 Okay, that's no.

01:16:05.520 --> 01:16:06.120
 Thank you.

01:16:06.120 --> 01:16:08.160
 >> All right, thank you.

01:16:08.160 --> 01:16:12.800
 >> So we can move on to item F, staff reports.

01:16:12.800 --> 01:16:15.440
 >> Okay, so.

01:16:15.440 --> 01:16:23.120
 All right, let me start with the matrix.

01:16:23.120 --> 01:16:27.240
 I can pull it up there but.

01:16:53.120 --> 01:17:09.360
 >> So I'll start with the first one, a quick update on that.

01:17:09.360 --> 01:17:14.600
 We are having our contractor on board, supposed to start either this week or

01:17:14.600 --> 01:17:19.080
 next week, in the next couple weeks, for that signal,

01:17:19.080 --> 01:17:24.920
 replacing the signal at Oak and Jago, and then Oak and Fry.

01:17:24.920 --> 01:17:29.360
 So those are the two signals, which is Avenue C is Jago.

01:17:29.360 --> 01:17:33.000
 Those signals will be replaced in the next two to three months.

01:17:33.000 --> 01:17:36.600
 I think their schedule is about 90 days.

01:17:36.600 --> 01:17:39.000
 >> Excuse me, can you tell if that mic is on?

01:17:39.000 --> 01:17:41.440
 >> This, I'm sorry.

01:17:41.440 --> 01:17:45.360
 >> Yeah, because I'm just getting light here and I'm wondering if that's the reason.

01:17:45.360 --> 01:17:49.480
 >> Is that why?

01:17:49.480 --> 01:17:50.160
 >> Do you think it's good?

01:17:50.160 --> 01:17:51.080
 >> It looks like it.

01:17:51.080 --> 01:17:53.320
 >> Okay, all right.

01:17:53.320 --> 01:17:57.000
 No, it's, hey there, back in the booth.

01:17:57.000 --> 01:17:59.200
 Notice this, the problem light is on.

01:17:59.200 --> 01:18:03.800
 >> It's setting tone, it's just flickering.

01:18:03.800 --> 01:18:12.920
 So Avenue C and Oak, that signal will be replaced in the next two to three months.

01:18:12.920 --> 01:18:16.920
 They are going to schedule it so that there are less disruptions to traffic.

01:18:16.920 --> 01:18:22.080
 They're primarily working on the four corners, so some of the lanes.

01:18:22.080 --> 01:18:29.160
 >> Okay, thanks.

01:18:29.160 --> 01:18:30.120
 >> You made him come here.

01:18:30.120 --> 01:18:40.680
 And then I think we got an update from DCTA, what their plans are.

01:18:40.680 --> 01:18:42.480
 They're looking at multiple different things.

01:18:42.480 --> 01:18:47.600
 And yes, benches and shelters is one aspect of it.

01:18:47.600 --> 01:18:50.240
 Striping on forward drive has been completed.

01:18:50.240 --> 01:18:53.840
 So we ultimately sneaked in our crews and

01:18:53.840 --> 01:18:57.840
 got the things done because we've been waiting on tech stuff for a long time.

01:18:57.840 --> 01:19:00.600
 >> Saved me from having to do it in the middle of the night.

01:19:00.600 --> 01:19:02.160
 >> [LAUGH]

01:19:02.160 --> 01:19:03.120
 >> I've got a striping machine.

01:19:03.120 --> 01:19:06.920
 >> [LAUGH]

01:19:06.920 --> 01:19:09.840
 >> So we did talk about the one way versus two way streets.

01:19:09.840 --> 01:19:14.160
 >> Mm-hm.

01:19:14.160 --> 01:19:17.960
 >> We did talk about one way versus two, and Carol wrote that.

01:19:17.960 --> 01:19:23.280
 So these two will be coming forward to the whole council

01:19:23.280 --> 01:19:27.280
 late in October as part of the mobility plan update.

01:19:27.280 --> 01:19:31.160
 We looked at the intersection of Bonnie Brand University, one of the things.

01:19:31.160 --> 01:19:33.600
 And let me see if I can quickly pull it up there.

01:19:33.600 --> 01:19:37.760
 >> Hang on, question, Council Member Briggs.

01:19:37.760 --> 01:19:45.320
 On the Carol Road diet, will there be data coming with that decision?

01:19:45.320 --> 01:19:48.000
 Or is it just kind of hypothetical?

01:19:48.000 --> 01:19:53.280
 >> No, so as part of our mobility plan, there'll be a full traffic model,

01:19:53.280 --> 01:19:58.680
 not just for existing conditions, but for future conditions when most of

01:19:58.680 --> 01:20:01.920
 the city would be built out, and during that conditions,

01:20:01.920 --> 01:20:04.560
 they will have traffic volumes on Carol.

01:20:04.560 --> 01:20:08.360
 So it would have an idea of, okay, this is not just only

01:20:08.360 --> 01:20:13.160
 traffic that's traveling today, but in the future, if we do the one way versus

01:20:13.160 --> 01:20:15.360
 two way, what would happen to Carol?

01:20:15.360 --> 01:20:19.360
 Would more traffic move to Carol if we change any configuration currently?

01:20:19.360 --> 01:20:23.120
 And those numbers will be available in the discussion saying, hey,

01:20:23.120 --> 01:20:26.040
 currently there are 10,000 vehicles daily.

01:20:26.040 --> 01:20:28.760
 In the future, there'll be 20,000 vehicles daily.

01:20:28.760 --> 01:20:32.240
 That's still good enough for a four lane divided facility.

01:20:32.240 --> 01:20:35.280
 Carol has six lanes, so we can really go down and reduce it.

01:20:35.280 --> 01:20:38.840
 So that's the discussion, and we'll come with data to back it up.

01:20:38.840 --> 01:20:39.560
 >> Okay, thank you.

01:20:39.560 --> 01:20:45.040
 >> Going back to University and Bonnie Bray.

01:20:45.040 --> 01:20:48.800
 So I think the request was to put a yield for

01:20:48.800 --> 01:20:54.960
 pedestrian, one of the things that we found out, especially on this particular arm.

01:20:54.960 --> 01:21:01.520
 This is an old signal, there are already quite a few things here.

01:21:01.520 --> 01:21:07.760
 So in order to add that yield on pedestrian next to this will be a tough.

01:21:07.760 --> 01:21:09.320
 If we put it here, it becomes an issue.

01:21:09.320 --> 01:21:10.840
 So we're kind of struggling.

01:21:10.840 --> 01:21:16.040
 This intersection will be redone completely as part of the Bonnie Bray project.

01:21:16.040 --> 01:21:19.720
 So it's not far away in the future.

01:21:19.720 --> 01:21:23.200
 It's something that's going to happen pretty soon as part of the phase six,

01:21:23.200 --> 01:21:25.920
 which is with the high school project coming in.

01:21:25.920 --> 01:21:30.240
 And what we're trying to do is, once we get this completely update,

01:21:30.240 --> 01:21:32.800
 we'll make sure that we'll have the right signage.

01:21:32.800 --> 01:21:36.160
 We're also looking at this corner and seeing if we-

01:21:36.160 --> 01:21:37.160
 >> Question? >> Yeah.

01:21:37.160 --> 01:21:40.480
 >> Yeah, well, just on that, when the school is built down there,

01:21:40.480 --> 01:21:43.360
 there will be a lot of people, I suspect, walkers.

01:21:43.360 --> 01:21:46.760
 If they're walking, that would be the intersection they would use to cross.

01:21:46.760 --> 01:21:47.520
 >> Correct. >> And so,

01:21:47.520 --> 01:21:49.120
 I'm just throwing that out there.

01:21:49.120 --> 01:21:51.680
 I'm sure you've already thought about that, so.

01:21:51.680 --> 01:21:54.960
 >> It'll be part of our new signal plan.

01:21:54.960 --> 01:21:57.760
 We'll definitely look at adding the yield signage here.

01:21:57.760 --> 01:22:01.600
 But we're also looking at this corner, if we can find a place to put that.

01:22:01.600 --> 01:22:04.040
 But it's a tough spot, sorry.

01:22:04.040 --> 01:22:10.120
 All right, I think Mark touched on this.

01:22:10.120 --> 01:22:15.600
 We're still coordinating some of the access issues at Allison University.

01:22:15.600 --> 01:22:18.960
 There is a coordination with TechStop.

01:22:18.960 --> 01:22:21.840
 It's TechStop property and private property.

01:22:21.840 --> 01:22:26.080
 So we're kind of the mediators trying to move this forward.

01:22:26.080 --> 01:22:27.840
 I really want to move.

01:22:27.840 --> 01:22:33.200
 So TurnBack, we're currently working with legal and

01:22:33.200 --> 01:22:36.360
 finalizing the TurnBack memo that was submitted.

01:22:36.360 --> 01:22:39.640
 It's a memorandum of understanding from TechStop.

01:22:39.640 --> 01:22:45.480
 And we're getting close to getting it to council and getting it approved.

01:22:45.480 --> 01:22:49.680
 And there are several streets on the memorandum of understanding that will be.

01:22:49.680 --> 01:22:52.480
 And Elman Locos will be part of that.

01:22:52.480 --> 01:22:57.440
 So it'll come to council very soon in the next few council meetings,

01:22:57.440 --> 01:22:59.840
 within the next few council meetings.

01:22:59.840 --> 01:23:00.640
 >> I comment on that.

01:23:00.640 --> 01:23:06.480
 I've seen some comments lately about, I forget which one of those has several

01:23:06.480 --> 01:23:10.120
 potholes or one of them is in pretty bad shape.

01:23:10.120 --> 01:23:15.640
 And it was my understanding that TechStop would have to fix those before we get,

01:23:15.640 --> 01:23:18.600
 would that be, is that part of the understanding or?

01:23:18.600 --> 01:23:23.400
 >> So yes, before we take it over, TechStop is going to reconstruct the entire

01:23:23.400 --> 01:23:25.200
 length of Locos to Allen.

01:23:25.200 --> 01:23:26.080
 That is the understanding.

01:23:26.080 --> 01:23:28.120
 That's exactly what's laid out in the MOU.

01:23:28.120 --> 01:23:29.600
 >> In our MOU.

01:23:29.600 --> 01:23:33.640
 >> What we're doing right now currently is working on a project to

01:23:33.640 --> 01:23:36.320
 relocate our utilities and redo our utilities.

01:23:36.320 --> 01:23:41.000
 Once that utility work is done, we're primarily based in the section south of

01:23:41.000 --> 01:23:47.760
 the downtown area between, I want to say between Hickory and all the way to Eagle.

01:23:47.760 --> 01:23:50.680
 We're working on relocating utilities there currently.

01:23:50.680 --> 01:23:55.680
 Once that segment is done, we'll move north up until all the way to university.

01:23:55.680 --> 01:23:59.200
 And TechStop will begin their reconstruction project for

01:23:59.200 --> 01:24:01.000
 the roadway on the south side.

01:24:01.000 --> 01:24:07.400
 So yes, they are upgrading the pavement before they hand it over to us.

01:24:07.400 --> 01:24:12.200
 As far as the forest ridge drive, we did check there were speed surveys back in

01:24:12.200 --> 01:24:18.480
 April and the 85th percentile speed was 35 miles an hour based on the survey.

01:24:18.480 --> 01:24:19.600
 We have the files.

01:24:19.600 --> 01:24:27.200
 So I think at this point, when the, I think when the survey was.

01:24:27.200 --> 01:24:32.160
 >> Was that what you expected or not or what are the implications of that finding?

01:24:32.160 --> 01:24:36.360
 >> Yeah, so I think the road is in fairly bad shape right now.

01:24:36.360 --> 01:24:42.760
 So that's why the speed is around 35, if you fix the road,

01:24:42.760 --> 01:24:44.640
 there might be chances that it may go up.

01:24:44.640 --> 01:24:48.480
 So yes, we're definitely doing a speed survey after the road is fixed.

01:24:48.480 --> 01:24:53.360
 And then, yeah, construction fatigue.

01:24:53.360 --> 01:24:58.160
 I think you saw the survey from Residence Day, one more construction well maintained.

01:24:58.160 --> 01:24:59.360
 No, I'm just kidding.

01:24:59.360 --> 01:25:05.840
 But definitely, as part of the mobility plan, once we have that in place,

01:25:05.840 --> 01:25:10.000
 then for future projects, we'll have a better planning,

01:25:10.000 --> 01:25:14.440
 a better idea of how we plan and stage projects.

01:25:14.440 --> 01:25:20.560
 We won't be going in and working on a whole segment in every piece or

01:25:20.560 --> 01:25:23.960
 every part of the city, it'll be more strategic.

01:25:23.960 --> 01:25:27.440
 As part of our, even as part of our bond program for the street rehab,

01:25:27.440 --> 01:25:31.360
 we're considering neighborhoods that we go in and do it at once, water, waste water,

01:25:31.360 --> 01:25:35.800
 and streets, and then get out of the neighborhood and don't go there for 30 years.

01:25:35.800 --> 01:25:38.280
 We do not do bits and pieces that we've been doing in the past.

01:25:38.280 --> 01:25:41.760
 So we do have a plan to address construction fatigue.

01:25:41.760 --> 01:25:43.960
 >> And I think that time phase map we talked about before.

01:25:43.960 --> 01:25:44.960
 >> Correct. >> Communicate that.

01:25:44.960 --> 01:25:48.320
 Councilmember Briggs, do you have something?

01:25:48.320 --> 01:25:49.080
 >> Any questions?

01:25:49.080 --> 01:25:52.200
 >> Okay.

01:25:52.200 --> 01:25:53.520
 >> Any other questions?

01:25:53.520 --> 01:25:55.960
 >> I actually wanted to reopen item C for a minute.

01:25:55.960 --> 01:26:00.160
 I had another question for you I neglected to ask, but are we done with staff reports?

01:26:00.160 --> 01:26:03.360
 >> Yes, I think so, unless you have no questions.

01:26:03.360 --> 01:26:05.280
 >> Okay, yeah, if you don't mind.

01:26:05.280 --> 01:26:06.960
 Would you mind coming back, Michelle?

01:26:06.960 --> 01:26:11.840
 So I'm going to reopen item C, which is DCTA update.

01:26:11.840 --> 01:26:18.080
 I just forgot to ask you, some time back when Nicole was still on the job,

01:26:18.080 --> 01:26:25.040
 we talked about the possibility of altering routes on the west side, bus routes,

01:26:25.040 --> 01:26:33.080
 to provide access by mass transit through the razor ranch amenities.

01:26:33.080 --> 01:26:37.440
 And I wonder if you could tell us anything about the status on that.

01:26:37.440 --> 01:26:40.160
 >> I think we are definitely looking at razor ranch, and

01:26:40.160 --> 01:26:45.600
 we're more looking at how we serve it with on-demand service versus fixed route service.

01:26:45.600 --> 01:26:51.280
 And so that will be part of the planning effort that we're kicking off now for

01:26:51.280 --> 01:26:56.720
 the implementation of mobility as a service, is how we serve those areas like razor ranch.

01:26:58.280 --> 01:27:05.040
 >> Is that because you don't see the demand for access for workers and

01:27:05.040 --> 01:27:07.680
 transit dependent people to those amenities?

01:27:07.680 --> 01:27:14.720
 >> The level of service versus the demand isn't quite there.

01:27:14.720 --> 01:27:18.960
 And we really tried with this last service change not to make major changes to

01:27:18.960 --> 01:27:22.320
 any of the routes, because we didn't want to make changes to the routes and

01:27:22.320 --> 01:27:26.600
 then take a look at the entire system and then change everything again.

01:27:26.600 --> 01:27:31.920
 And so we're looking at areas like north of university.

01:27:31.920 --> 01:27:37.960
 We've had some requests from the city and council members of serving, like Explorium.

01:27:37.960 --> 01:27:43.040
 We don't currently go north of 380, so the question becomes how do we serve 380

01:27:43.040 --> 01:27:46.560
 when the demand for service isn't there to justify a fixed route?

01:27:46.560 --> 01:27:48.680
 And so razor ranch is sort of a similar way.

01:27:48.680 --> 01:27:50.520
 And then like you said, it's retail.

01:27:50.520 --> 01:27:53.480
 Currently our service stops about 9, 930.

01:27:53.480 --> 01:27:57.400
 If you're working retail, you're generally working till at least nine.

01:27:57.400 --> 01:27:59.520
 If not later, especially if it's a restaurant,

01:27:59.520 --> 01:28:03.480
 how do we serve those individuals in those areas best?

01:28:03.480 --> 01:28:09.000
 And maybe that's not necessarily a fixed route, but some on demand type of service.

01:28:09.000 --> 01:28:12.120
 >> Okay, thanks for coming back to the shared perspective.

01:28:12.120 --> 01:28:12.640
 >> No problem.

01:28:12.640 --> 01:28:19.000
 >> Okay, so I'll reclose that item and are we then closed on staff reports as well?

01:28:19.000 --> 01:28:21.560
 So concluding items, council member Briggs.

01:28:21.560 --> 01:28:27.320
 >> Just one and it's more of a follow up to a message that I sent with the city manager.

01:28:27.320 --> 01:28:34.640
 It was about the university and carol intersection and the turn.

01:28:34.640 --> 01:28:41.640
 I think there's been a couple accidents there with the yellow turn lights, the yield on yellow.

01:28:41.640 --> 01:28:47.720
 It's hard to see if all the other lanes straight in front of you are full.

01:28:47.720 --> 01:28:50.120
 It's hard to see if cars are coming or not.

01:28:50.120 --> 01:28:56.520
 People are attempting to turn on the yellow arrow and it's causing accidents or near misses.

01:28:56.520 --> 01:29:02.480
 And so that was a, I'm just following up on that because our process has changed and

01:29:02.480 --> 01:29:05.920
 I just wanted to make sure that that was looked at in this committee.

01:29:05.920 --> 01:29:08.240
 >> Follow up question on that.

01:29:08.240 --> 01:29:11.760
 This is from University onto Carol.

01:29:11.760 --> 01:29:14.640
 So it's westbound to southbound Carol.

01:29:14.640 --> 01:29:16.480
 Is that the movement?

01:29:16.480 --> 01:29:19.600
 I just want to get the movements right so that we're, it's on University.

01:29:19.600 --> 01:29:24.760
 >> I'm not sure exactly, I've heard it from people using in all,

01:29:24.760 --> 01:29:30.720
 either coming onto University off Carol by Kroger or by the other intersection.

01:29:30.720 --> 01:29:31.600
 >> Okay.

01:29:31.600 --> 01:29:34.000
 >> So, yes, I guess.

01:29:34.000 --> 01:29:39.440
 >> We'll definitely look at all directions and make some changes as a matter of signal.

01:29:39.440 --> 01:29:43.120
 >> With accident data, I don't have the data to prove it.

01:29:43.120 --> 01:29:48.360
 I've just had people send me messages and there was a pretty bad accident recently.

01:29:48.360 --> 01:29:48.880
 >> Okay.

01:29:48.880 --> 01:29:50.480
 >> So, I'm just following up on that.

01:29:50.480 --> 01:29:55.680
 >> Mr. Brian, any items?

01:29:55.680 --> 01:30:01.600
 >> Yeah, I've got one and I've already brought this up in engineering, but I'll just put it on the record.

01:30:01.600 --> 01:30:07.040
 And that is at Dallas and Teasley, especially when you are southbound

01:30:07.040 --> 01:30:11.000
 Dallas Drive turning onto Teasley Lane, taken right there.

01:30:11.000 --> 01:30:17.440
 Where the old pavement and new pavement and new pavement and curve line up.

01:30:19.360 --> 01:30:21.840
 There are some dips.

01:30:21.840 --> 01:30:22.340
 >> Okay.

01:30:22.340 --> 01:30:29.280
 >> They're not truly potholes because the pavement is still there, the pavement has just sunk.

01:30:29.280 --> 01:30:35.080
 >> So, this is, you're talking about the right turn lane or the left turn lane?

01:30:35.080 --> 01:30:36.520
 >> This is on the right turn lane.

01:30:36.520 --> 01:30:38.440
 >> For the southbound right onto Teasley.

01:30:38.440 --> 01:30:44.800
 >> Onto Teasley and then as you get onto Teasley where we widen the road just before the,

01:30:44.800 --> 01:30:48.280
 you have that triangle of new pavement where we widened it.

01:30:48.280 --> 01:30:50.400
 There's a huge bump right there as well.

01:30:50.400 --> 01:30:51.400
 >> I know what you're talking about.

01:30:51.400 --> 01:31:08.240
 >> I'm trying to remember the name of that street that I know we've communicated about.

01:31:08.240 --> 01:31:12.840
 That's just a short segment that connects between Sherman and Bell.

01:31:18.280 --> 01:31:21.080
 Sherman and Bell.

01:31:21.080 --> 01:31:22.320
 >> That's it.

01:31:22.320 --> 01:31:24.080
 It was wood something.

01:31:24.080 --> 01:31:29.440
 Yeah, I just wanted to thank you for getting out there and filling about six potholes.

01:31:29.440 --> 01:31:35.480
 I suspect while the crew was out there, you probably noticed that everything that isn't

01:31:35.480 --> 01:31:39.000
 a pothole is almost as bad as a pothole on that one block.

01:31:39.000 --> 01:31:42.440
 And I appreciate your attention on that matter.

01:31:42.440 --> 01:31:47.520
 >> Thank you, I'll let Danny know.

01:31:47.520 --> 01:31:49.920
 He runs our street crews.

01:31:49.920 --> 01:31:57.360
 >> I'll be interested to hear sort of what that timing is for kind of a complete resurfacing.

01:31:57.360 --> 01:32:01.160
 It's about the worst stretch I've seen in Den of a block.

01:32:01.160 --> 01:32:04.960
 >> Maybe there are other candidates.

01:32:04.960 --> 01:32:06.160
 >> You just opened up.

01:32:06.160 --> 01:32:07.560
 >> Yeah, okay.

01:32:07.560 --> 01:32:12.760
 Maybe we should have a little moment at each meeting to try to pick what is the worst segment in Den.

01:32:12.760 --> 01:32:14.880
 Candidates?

01:32:16.400 --> 01:32:18.280
 All right, I like that.

01:32:18.280 --> 01:32:20.320
 Okay, that's everything then.

01:32:20.320 --> 01:32:20.960
 Thank you very much.

01:32:20.960 --> 01:32:26.280
 We'll conclude the meeting at 943.

01:32:26.280 --> 01:32:26.780
 >> Thank you.