WEBVTT

00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:05.220
 >> Good afternoon and welcome to the City of Denton's Planning and Zoning Commission

00:00:05.220 --> 00:00:07.860
 meeting for Wednesday, September 25th.

00:00:07.860 --> 00:00:15.000
 This is our work session and with a quorum present, I will call us to order at 5.31 p.m.

00:00:15.000 --> 00:00:22.020
 First item on our work session agenda is citizen comment on consent agenda.

00:00:22.020 --> 00:00:24.520
 Is there anyone wishing to speak on consent?

00:00:24.520 --> 00:00:25.520
 Okay.

00:00:25.520 --> 00:00:31.080
 All right, that will take us then to the clarification on tonight's agenda.

00:00:31.080 --> 00:00:33.280
 That's our minutes for September 11th.

00:00:33.280 --> 00:00:35.920
 Any questions, issues there?

00:00:35.920 --> 00:00:37.120
 Okay.

00:00:37.120 --> 00:00:41.720
 And then our consent agenda has two items.

00:00:41.720 --> 00:00:42.720
 Questions on those?

00:00:42.720 --> 00:00:47.960
 Make sure I don't have any notes.

00:00:47.960 --> 00:00:48.960
 Okay.

00:00:48.960 --> 00:00:49.960
 Okay.

00:00:49.960 --> 00:00:51.400
 Items for individual consideration.

00:00:51.400 --> 00:00:56.280
 Our first being FP240016.

00:00:56.280 --> 00:00:57.520
 Erin, hi.

00:00:57.520 --> 00:00:58.520
 >> Hello.

00:00:58.520 --> 00:01:03.320
 >> Give us the summary on that one, please.

00:01:03.320 --> 00:01:07.480
 >> Good evening, Erin Stanley, assistant planner.

00:01:07.480 --> 00:01:15.320
 This is Redbird Ridge edition and this is a final plat for -- this one's not it.

00:01:15.320 --> 00:01:16.320
 >> Nope.

00:01:16.320 --> 00:01:17.320
 >> No.

00:01:17.320 --> 00:01:19.080
 There we go.

00:01:19.080 --> 00:01:21.640
 FP240016.

00:01:21.640 --> 00:01:26.040
 This is a final plat on approximately 38.4 acres.

00:01:26.040 --> 00:01:29.200
 This is generally south of Country Club Road.

00:01:29.200 --> 00:01:32.760
 It's kind of hard to see, but it's right here, it's Country Club.

00:01:32.760 --> 00:01:40.480
 And then east of -- east of Oak Ridge Lane and north of Fincher, it's kind of turned

00:01:40.480 --> 00:01:41.480
 around here.

00:01:41.480 --> 00:01:46.320
 But this is out in the ETJ division one and this is -- they still have a few more comments

00:01:46.320 --> 00:01:47.320
 to work through.

00:01:47.320 --> 00:01:55.080
 FP240016, they've requested a first extension and staff has no problem with that extension,

00:01:55.080 --> 00:01:57.800
 which could be granted to October 23rd, 2024.

00:01:57.800 --> 00:01:58.800
 >> Great.

00:01:58.800 --> 00:02:00.280
 Questions for Erin?

00:02:00.280 --> 00:02:01.280
 Yep.

00:02:01.280 --> 00:02:02.280
 Commissioner?

00:02:02.280 --> 00:02:05.920
 >> Sorry if I missed it.

00:02:05.920 --> 00:02:06.920
 What number extension is this?

00:02:06.920 --> 00:02:07.920
 >> First.

00:02:07.920 --> 00:02:08.920
 >> First.

00:02:08.920 --> 00:02:09.920
 Thank you.

00:02:09.920 --> 00:02:10.920
 >> Anything else?

00:02:10.920 --> 00:02:11.920
 Okay.

00:02:11.920 --> 00:02:14.920
 Thank you.

00:02:14.920 --> 00:02:17.880
 First is -- actually, 4B has been withdrawn.

00:02:17.880 --> 00:02:19.680
 We did get an email on that.

00:02:19.680 --> 00:02:22.560
 So we will not be taking any action there.

00:02:22.560 --> 00:02:28.200
 Then it's 4C, FP240010.

00:02:28.200 --> 00:02:32.800
 Julie is here to give a summary of that.

00:02:32.800 --> 00:02:34.480
 >> Good evening, Julie Wyatt.

00:02:34.480 --> 00:02:37.160
 This is the final plat for a multifamily development.

00:02:37.160 --> 00:02:43.160
 It actually is a combination of horizontal multifamily and then typical more garden style

00:02:43.160 --> 00:02:45.440
 apartment multifamily.

00:02:45.440 --> 00:02:48.520
 Some of you might remember this from a couple of years ago.

00:02:48.520 --> 00:02:53.560
 We had a comprehensive plan amendment, zoning case, and SUP for it.

00:02:53.560 --> 00:02:57.320
 It is located on May Hill, just north of Russell Newman.

00:02:57.320 --> 00:03:01.040
 They have a couple things they still need to work out on the civil plans.

00:03:01.040 --> 00:03:03.820
 So they are requesting an extension.

00:03:03.820 --> 00:03:05.360
 This is their second extension.

00:03:05.360 --> 00:03:07.480
 I'll be happy to answer any questions.

00:03:07.480 --> 00:03:09.480
 >> Thanks, Julie.

00:03:09.480 --> 00:03:10.480
 Questions?

00:03:10.480 --> 00:03:11.480
 Okay.

00:03:11.480 --> 00:03:12.480
 >> Thank you.

00:03:12.480 --> 00:03:18.160
 We've got a couple -- well, actually, we are going to hear one of the public hearings tonight.

00:03:18.160 --> 00:03:25.920
 The 5A is being requested to be postponed until October 9th.

00:03:25.920 --> 00:03:31.320
 They would like us to open the public hearing and leave it open and then take a vote on

00:03:31.320 --> 00:03:34.000
 a postponement to October 9th.

00:03:34.000 --> 00:03:35.440
 Questions there?

00:03:35.440 --> 00:03:36.440
 Okay.

00:03:36.440 --> 00:03:44.280
 Then our public hearing that we will hear tonight, hello, Bryce, is 5B DCA 240011.

00:03:44.280 --> 00:03:45.280
 >> Good evening, commission.

00:03:45.280 --> 00:03:46.920
 Bryce VanArsdale, assistant planner.

00:03:46.920 --> 00:03:53.280
 This is DCA 240011 related to the addition of commercial animal services to the land

00:03:53.280 --> 00:03:56.080
 use definitions in the DIN development code.

00:03:56.080 --> 00:04:03.320
 On August 28th, we did conduct a work session item over this and went over the proposed

00:04:03.320 --> 00:04:08.080
 definition updates as well as the removal of kennel from the DIN development code.

00:04:08.080 --> 00:04:11.400
 With that, we did receive three comments from you all.

00:04:11.400 --> 00:04:15.080
 One, we did redo the language -- or reword the language so it was more clear about what

00:04:15.080 --> 00:04:18.360
 was primarily indoor and primarily outdoor.

00:04:18.360 --> 00:04:24.680
 Secondly, we did add to the use specific standards the -- some standards that are from the Texas

00:04:24.680 --> 00:04:28.760
 health and safety code that relate to the climate control, the health, and the cleanliness

00:04:28.760 --> 00:04:31.920
 of those quarantine and impoundment areas.

00:04:31.920 --> 00:04:36.680
 Additionally, we did add a provision to the use specific standards that allows for the

00:04:36.680 --> 00:04:42.560
 use of outdoor areas for pet relief and specified that no portion of this use specific standard

00:04:42.560 --> 00:04:45.200
 will -- is intended to prevent that from occurring.

00:04:45.200 --> 00:04:50.040
 I do have a longer presentation that I'm happy to go through, but I will do that during the

00:04:50.040 --> 00:04:52.120
 regular session, and I'll stand for any questions.

00:04:52.120 --> 00:04:53.120
 >> Thank you, Bryce.

00:04:53.120 --> 00:04:54.120
 Questions?

00:04:54.120 --> 00:04:55.120
 Commissioner Pritz?

00:04:55.120 --> 00:05:03.560
 >> I think we got a few public comments on this concerning one particular existing business.

00:05:03.560 --> 00:05:08.440
 Has staff heard anything about other businesses that would be concerned about this change,

00:05:08.440 --> 00:05:12.400
 or is that the only feedback that we've gotten from residents and businesses concerning an

00:05:12.400 --> 00:05:15.960
 existing use that would be affected by this?

00:05:15.960 --> 00:05:16.960
 >> Yeah, absolutely.

00:05:16.960 --> 00:05:19.800
 So I do have -- I have this slide towards the end.

00:05:19.800 --> 00:05:25.320
 We did mail 12 929 notices out, which go out to the affected property owners as well as

00:05:25.320 --> 00:05:26.320
 the affected businesses.

00:05:26.320 --> 00:05:28.320
 We did receive three in opposition.

00:05:28.320 --> 00:05:33.360
 Two of those were related to the -- Club K9 is the one that we received the most feedback

00:05:33.360 --> 00:05:34.360
 about.

00:05:34.360 --> 00:05:38.720
 Just to specify, these businesses are, per the ordinance, going to be deemed conforming

00:05:38.720 --> 00:05:40.840
 uses and allowed to continue as they are.

00:05:40.840 --> 00:05:44.800
 We're not going to go in and change any of their business activity, anything like that.

00:05:44.800 --> 00:05:50.080
 Again, I think we received one phone call regarding a different business, but Club K9

00:05:50.080 --> 00:05:53.560
 was the majority of the feedback that we received.

00:05:53.560 --> 00:05:54.560
 >> Okay.

00:05:54.560 --> 00:05:55.560
 Yeah.

00:05:55.560 --> 00:05:56.560
 Thank you.

00:05:56.560 --> 00:05:57.560
 >> Yeah.

00:05:57.560 --> 00:06:04.840
 >> And you've talked with those businesses, like saying those words that you just said

00:06:04.840 --> 00:06:05.840
 to us?

00:06:05.840 --> 00:06:06.840
 >> Yes.

00:06:06.840 --> 00:06:07.840
 >> Okay.

00:06:07.840 --> 00:06:11.040
 >> There was, I believe, two letters I received that they didn't request feedback, so I didn't

00:06:11.040 --> 00:06:15.200
 reach back out to them, but there were two that I did receive feedback from, a request

00:06:15.200 --> 00:06:19.040
 for clarification on, and I reached out to those owners and we had that conversation

00:06:19.040 --> 00:06:20.040
 as well.

00:06:20.040 --> 00:06:22.540
 >> But they still are in opposition?

00:06:22.540 --> 00:06:24.840
 >> They didn't revise the letter they sent.

00:06:24.840 --> 00:06:25.840
 >> Okay.

00:06:25.840 --> 00:06:26.840
 >> They sounded like it was fine.

00:06:26.840 --> 00:06:28.940
 I do believe they'll be here to speak tonight.

00:06:28.940 --> 00:06:34.400
 I interpreted it and explained it as best as I could, under the impression that they're

00:06:34.400 --> 00:06:38.120
 all good, but knowing they'll be here tonight, I'm sure they'll speak on it.

00:06:38.120 --> 00:06:39.120
 >> Okay.

00:06:39.120 --> 00:06:40.120
 Yeah.

00:06:40.120 --> 00:06:47.360
 >> Just to add to Bryce's comments, so one of the challenges that we have with what we

00:06:47.360 --> 00:06:53.800
 refer to as the 929 notice is state law requires us to put language on the notice.

00:06:53.800 --> 00:07:00.720
 It's in 14 or 16-point bold that says basically your business may become nonconforming, and

00:07:00.720 --> 00:07:05.600
 so we try to provide some contextual information within the letter as well, so to Bryce's point,

00:07:05.600 --> 00:07:09.960
 having those conversations with those property owners or those businesses is really good,

00:07:09.960 --> 00:07:12.400
 so hopefully we can allay any concerns or fears.

00:07:12.400 --> 00:07:17.700
 Our intent is not to make them nonconforming, and we've been very cognizant as we've worked

00:07:17.700 --> 00:07:21.400
 on this proposed ordinance amendment taken into consideration where we currently allow

00:07:21.400 --> 00:07:25.960
 the businesses, because keep in mind, under our current definition, we classify them as

00:07:25.960 --> 00:07:26.960
 personal service.

00:07:26.960 --> 00:07:31.240
 It's kind of the stretch we've made, especially like the groomers, it's pretty obvious.

00:07:31.240 --> 00:07:36.400
 The folks that do the boarding, it's a little more challenging for us to -- and so we haven't

00:07:36.400 --> 00:07:39.840
 been able to really fully apply that, so we're just trying to do some cleanup also from that

00:07:39.840 --> 00:07:46.160
 perspective, but that notice that goes out, it can be very intimidating, even despite

00:07:46.160 --> 00:07:49.080
 us providing some additional contextual information for their benefit.

00:07:49.080 --> 00:07:53.160
 >> I believe the exact wording is you may lose the right to continue operating your

00:07:53.160 --> 00:07:54.160
 business.

00:07:54.160 --> 00:07:56.200
 It's a little bit miscommunicating.

00:07:56.200 --> 00:08:02.360
 >> Right, yeah, because I mean, the way that they word this, please do not close this business,

00:08:02.360 --> 00:08:03.360
 you know.

00:08:03.360 --> 00:08:05.720
 >> We have no intent, no plans to do that.

00:08:05.720 --> 00:08:11.000
 They're allowed to continue operating as they are, and that's -- that'll be that with the

00:08:11.000 --> 00:08:12.000
 proposal.

00:08:12.000 --> 00:08:13.000
 >> Thank you, Chair.

00:08:13.000 --> 00:08:20.920
 Yeah, I think -- thank you for that additional background and reminding us of those notices.

00:08:20.920 --> 00:08:27.440
 I'm not heartbroken about this, but I did notice that at least in the case of Club Canine,

00:08:27.440 --> 00:08:32.000
 they are -- you know, the majority of their property is in our zone, but it's a split-zoned

00:08:32.000 --> 00:08:35.800
 property with some strip zoning that's R4.

00:08:35.800 --> 00:08:39.440
 Technically that means they're taking access through an R4 lot that doesn't allow this

00:08:39.440 --> 00:08:46.700
 even with an SUP, so my head starts spinning in the case where any modifications or anything

00:08:46.700 --> 00:08:51.240
 else would be desired by that business, and then thinking, does this apply to others?

00:08:51.240 --> 00:08:58.800
 So if there's something I'm missing of why that access through doesn't apply here, please

00:08:58.800 --> 00:09:01.240
 let me know.

00:09:01.240 --> 00:09:05.520
 If so, maybe there's something we can look at going forward after this to bring that

00:09:05.520 --> 00:09:06.520
 into conformance.

00:09:06.520 --> 00:09:07.520
 I don't know.

00:09:07.520 --> 00:09:08.520
 That's my thought.

00:09:08.520 --> 00:09:13.340
 >> So presumably they have a valid certificate of occupancy that allows them to operate today,

00:09:13.340 --> 00:09:15.720
 and so they are able to continue operating.

00:09:15.720 --> 00:09:20.920
 So even given the change we made to the DEC -- gosh, when was that, last year, maybe two

00:09:20.920 --> 00:09:25.640
 years ago, when we clarified the requirement of when you take access it has to be through

00:09:25.640 --> 00:09:29.840
 a zoning district that allows your property or that allows your use, they are still able

00:09:29.840 --> 00:09:32.760
 to continue operating as a nonconforming use.

00:09:32.760 --> 00:09:38.120
 If they ever decide to expand later on, make modifications, then we'll look to see what

00:09:38.120 --> 00:09:43.640
 is it at that time that they're doing to their property, but we will continue to respect

00:09:43.640 --> 00:09:47.000
 the fact that they are able to function as a nonconforming business.

00:09:47.000 --> 00:09:48.620
 Our intention is not to close anyone down.

00:09:48.620 --> 00:09:53.320
 To Bryce's point, nonconforming uses in our community, they're allowed to continue operating

00:09:53.320 --> 00:09:59.800
 in perpetuity unless the business closes their doors or the property owner ceases the use

00:09:59.800 --> 00:10:03.160
 for more than a year, then they lose that one particular use that's allowed under the

00:10:03.160 --> 00:10:06.680
 code, but they still benefit from all the other uses that are allowed in the zoning

00:10:06.680 --> 00:10:07.680
 district.

00:10:07.680 --> 00:10:12.080
 >> And with this specific ordinance, we do ensure they're considered conforming rather

00:10:12.080 --> 00:10:16.160
 than nonconforming, which basically, as my conversation with Hillary, is that if the

00:10:16.160 --> 00:10:21.680
 business were, God forbid, to burn down more than 50%, they would still be able to rebuild

00:10:21.680 --> 00:10:23.560
 that business as it exists today.

00:10:23.560 --> 00:10:28.520
 If they do any additions or any modifications in that sense, then they would have to bring

00:10:28.520 --> 00:10:33.720
 it up to standards with our 5.35 that would be proposed, but as it is, it would still

00:10:33.720 --> 00:10:37.160
 be a conforming business, per that definition.

00:10:37.160 --> 00:10:38.160
 >> Okay.

00:10:38.160 --> 00:10:39.160
 Great.

00:10:39.160 --> 00:10:40.160
 Anything else?

00:10:40.160 --> 00:10:41.160
 Okay.

00:10:41.160 --> 00:10:42.160
 Thank you very much.

00:10:42.160 --> 00:10:43.160
 >> Thank you.

00:10:43.160 --> 00:10:48.400
 >> I think that was our last item on the agenda.

00:10:48.400 --> 00:10:53.760
 Before I close work session, you can see that Commissioner Cole is not here.

00:10:53.760 --> 00:10:55.640
 There was a new appointment for him.

00:10:55.640 --> 00:10:58.480
 He did term out and he was a holdover.

00:10:58.480 --> 00:11:03.400
 That new appointment, we will meet at our next meeting, but certainly, we thank Commissioner

00:11:03.400 --> 00:11:10.720
 Cole for his six-plus years of service with us and all he brought to the room.

00:11:10.720 --> 00:11:14.160
 So we appreciate that very much, and I'll mention that again in the public meeting.

00:11:14.160 --> 00:11:19.720
 I'll go ahead and close our work session at 5.42 p.m. and we will reconvene at 6.30 in

00:11:19.720 --> 00:11:26.520
 council chambers.

00:11:26.520 --> 00:11:30.920
 >> Good evening and welcome to the city planning and zoning commission meeting for Wednesday,

00:11:30.920 --> 00:11:33.500
 September 25th, 2024.

00:11:33.500 --> 00:11:37.960
 With the quorum present, I'll call us to order at 6.30 p.m.

00:11:37.960 --> 00:11:42.080
 First item on our agenda is the Pledge of Allegiance to the U.S. and Texas flags.

00:11:42.080 --> 00:11:49.600
 >> I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America, and to the republic

00:11:49.600 --> 00:11:57.240
 for which it stands, one nation, under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for

00:11:57.240 --> 00:11:58.240
 all.

00:11:58.240 --> 00:12:10.320
 >> Honor the Texas flag, which is to thee, Texas, one state, under God, one and indivisible.

00:12:10.320 --> 00:12:17.720
 >> First item on our agenda for consideration is the approval of our minutes for September

00:12:17.720 --> 00:12:20.040
 11th.

00:12:20.040 --> 00:12:21.040
 Commissioner Villarreal.

00:12:21.040 --> 00:12:22.040
 >> Move approval.

00:12:22.040 --> 00:12:23.040
 >> Thank you.

00:12:23.040 --> 00:12:24.040
 Commissioner Padron.

00:12:24.040 --> 00:12:25.040
 >> Second.

00:12:25.040 --> 00:12:26.040
 >> Okay.

00:12:26.040 --> 00:12:27.040
 We've got a first and a second.

00:12:27.040 --> 00:12:28.040
 Any discussion?

00:12:28.040 --> 00:12:29.040
 Okay.

00:12:29.040 --> 00:12:37.040
 Let's vote, please.

00:12:37.040 --> 00:12:40.000
 That motion carries 4-0.

00:12:40.000 --> 00:12:46.040
 That will take us to our items for individual consideration, the first one being 4A, FP2-40016.

00:12:46.040 --> 00:12:47.040
 Aaron is second.

00:12:47.040 --> 00:12:48.040
 >> Second.

00:12:48.040 --> 00:12:49.040
 >> We have a second.

00:12:49.040 --> 00:12:50.040
 >> Okay.

00:12:50.040 --> 00:12:51.040
 We have a second.

00:12:51.040 --> 00:12:52.040
 >> Second.

00:12:52.040 --> 00:12:53.040
 >> We have a second.

00:12:53.040 --> 00:12:54.040
 >> Okay.

00:12:54.040 --> 00:12:55.040
 We have a second.

00:12:55.040 --> 00:12:56.040
 >> Second.

00:12:56.040 --> 00:12:57.040
 >> Okay.

00:12:57.040 --> 00:12:58.040
 Let's vote, please.

00:12:58.040 --> 00:13:01.720
 That motion carries 4-0.

00:13:01.720 --> 00:13:09.640
 That will take us to our items for individual consideration, the first one being 4A, FP2-40016.

00:13:09.640 --> 00:13:11.040
 Aaron is here for presentation.

00:13:11.040 --> 00:13:12.040
 Hi.

00:13:12.040 --> 00:13:13.040
 >> Hello.

00:13:13.040 --> 00:13:15.800
 Aaron Stanley, assistant planner.

00:13:15.800 --> 00:13:23.600
 This is a final plat for Redbird Ridge addition, a 38.4-acre site generally south of Country

00:13:23.600 --> 00:13:29.520
 Club Road, and this is for 17 residential lots and for HOA lots.

00:13:29.520 --> 00:13:33.600
 At this time, they've not met our criteria for approval, but staff has no objection to

00:13:33.600 --> 00:13:38.560
 the requested extension, which could be granted to October 23rd.

00:13:38.560 --> 00:13:39.560
 >> Thank you.

00:13:39.560 --> 00:13:40.560
 Any questions for Aaron?

00:13:40.560 --> 00:13:41.560
 Thank you.

00:13:41.560 --> 00:13:42.560
 Commissioner Villarreal.

00:13:42.560 --> 00:13:49.440
 >> We have approval of the requested extension to a date certain of October 23rd, 2024.

00:13:49.440 --> 00:13:50.440
 >> Thank you.

00:13:50.440 --> 00:13:51.440
 Commissioner Pruitt.

00:13:51.440 --> 00:13:52.440
 >> Second.

00:13:52.440 --> 00:13:55.960
 >> Got a first and a second to grant their extension request to a date certain of October

00:13:55.960 --> 00:13:58.600
 23rd, 2024.

00:13:58.600 --> 00:14:00.080
 Any discussion?

00:14:00.080 --> 00:14:01.240
 Okay.

00:14:01.240 --> 00:14:07.360
 Let's vote, please.

00:14:07.360 --> 00:14:10.040
 That motion carries for zero.

00:14:10.040 --> 00:14:14.940
 Our item that was listed on the agenda, item 4B, that item has been withdrawn by the applicant,

00:14:14.940 --> 00:14:17.520
 so we will not be taking action there.

00:14:17.520 --> 00:14:22.760
 So that will take us to 4C, FP2-40010.

00:14:22.760 --> 00:14:23.920
 Julie is here for presentation.

00:14:23.920 --> 00:14:24.920
 Hi, Julie.

00:14:24.920 --> 00:14:25.920
 >> Good evening.

00:14:25.920 --> 00:14:26.920
 Julie Wyatt.

00:14:26.920 --> 00:14:34.600
 And I am presenting a final plat for a multifamily development located just west of Mayhill Road,

00:14:34.600 --> 00:14:36.800
 north of Russell Newman.

00:14:36.800 --> 00:14:39.840
 This multifamily use was approved by a specific use permit.

00:14:39.840 --> 00:14:44.760
 They do have a couple of items they still need to work through in order to meet the

00:14:44.760 --> 00:14:47.600
 minimum technical requirements of the plat.

00:14:47.600 --> 00:14:49.080
 So staff is recommending denial.

00:14:49.080 --> 00:14:53.280
 However, we have no objection to the second extension request from the applicant.

00:14:53.280 --> 00:14:55.360
 I'll be happy to answer any questions.

00:14:55.360 --> 00:14:56.360
 >> Thank you, Julie.

00:14:56.360 --> 00:14:58.360
 Any questions for Julie?

00:14:58.360 --> 00:14:59.360
 Okay.

00:14:59.360 --> 00:15:00.360
 >> Thank you.

00:15:00.360 --> 00:15:06.760
 >> Thank you very much.

00:15:06.760 --> 00:15:13.920
 I'll go ahead and motion to grant the extension request to a date certain of October 23, 2024.

00:15:13.920 --> 00:15:14.920
 Commissioner Pedron?

00:15:14.920 --> 00:15:15.920
 >> Second.

00:15:15.920 --> 00:15:16.920
 >> Okay.

00:15:16.920 --> 00:15:22.240
 We've got a first and a second to grant the extension to a date certain of October 23,

00:15:22.240 --> 00:15:23.240
 2024.

00:15:23.240 --> 00:15:24.240
 Discussion?

00:15:24.240 --> 00:15:25.240
 Okay.

00:15:25.240 --> 00:15:30.560
 Please.

00:15:30.560 --> 00:15:32.220
 The motion carries 4-0.

00:15:32.220 --> 00:15:36.280
 That will take us to our public hearings for this evening.

00:15:36.280 --> 00:15:44.440
 Item 5A, PD240004, staff is requesting this item be postponed until a date certain of

00:15:44.440 --> 00:15:46.080
 October the 9th.

00:15:46.080 --> 00:15:51.120
 So I'm going to go ahead and open the public hearing and leave that public hearing open

00:15:51.120 --> 00:15:59.000
 and then look for a motion to postpone.

00:15:59.000 --> 00:16:00.000
 Commissioner Villareal?

00:16:00.000 --> 00:16:06.120
 >> I move postponement to a date certain of October 9th, 2024.

00:16:06.120 --> 00:16:07.120
 >> Thank you.

00:16:07.120 --> 00:16:08.120
 Commissioner Pruitt?

00:16:08.120 --> 00:16:09.120
 >> Second.

00:16:09.120 --> 00:16:10.120
 >> Okay.

00:16:10.120 --> 00:16:14.960
 We've got a first and a second to postpone this item to October 9th, 2024, leaving the

00:16:14.960 --> 00:16:16.520
 public hearing open.

00:16:16.520 --> 00:16:17.520
 Discussion?

00:16:17.520 --> 00:16:18.520
 Okay.

00:16:18.520 --> 00:16:26.240
 Let's go ahead and vote, please.

00:16:26.240 --> 00:16:28.760
 The motion carries 4-0.

00:16:28.760 --> 00:16:34.680
 That will take us to item 5B, DCA240011.

00:16:34.680 --> 00:16:35.680
 Bryce is here for presentation.

00:16:35.680 --> 00:16:37.720
 I will go ahead and open the public hearing.

00:16:37.720 --> 00:16:38.720
 >> Good evening, Commissioner.

00:16:38.720 --> 00:16:39.720
 Bryce Van Arsdale, Assistant Planner.

00:16:39.720 --> 00:16:47.160
 This is DCA240011, related to the addition of commercial animal services.

00:16:47.160 --> 00:16:53.160
 Currently, the DDC uses kennel and personal service grooming to capture most domestic

00:16:53.160 --> 00:16:55.000
 animal-related businesses.

00:16:55.000 --> 00:16:59.080
 However, as the market has developed, we often see businesses which include multiple uses

00:16:59.080 --> 00:17:00.080
 under one roof.

00:17:00.080 --> 00:17:04.080
 For instance, we'll see a doggie daycare, which in addition to the daycare use, will

00:17:04.080 --> 00:17:07.960
 also provide training, grooming or overnight boarding.

00:17:07.960 --> 00:17:11.800
 As we consider those sorts of businesses, I'll call your attention to the existing definitions

00:17:11.800 --> 00:17:17.000
 where we see in kennel, we have both overnight boarding as well as training, and then in

00:17:17.000 --> 00:17:20.880
 the personal service, general, we also include the pet grooming shops.

00:17:20.880 --> 00:17:24.280
 So, you can see that when we have multiple of these uses under one roof, it can be a

00:17:24.280 --> 00:17:29.640
 little bit murky for staff to interpret which regulations to apply.

00:17:29.640 --> 00:17:32.720
 Staff's proposing two additions to the development code.

00:17:32.720 --> 00:17:35.840
 There's commercial animal service indoor and commercial service outdoor.

00:17:35.840 --> 00:17:40.560
 The differentiation is going to be made within the use-specific standards.

00:17:40.560 --> 00:17:45.120
 Both of these definitions will apply to the grooming, training, boarding, adoption and

00:17:45.120 --> 00:17:47.360
 daycare of domestic animals.

00:17:47.360 --> 00:17:51.360
 I'm looking at the table of allowed uses.

00:17:51.360 --> 00:17:56.000
 You'll notice that kennel is removed as most of these businesses, of the proposed businesses,

00:17:56.000 --> 00:17:58.760
 will now fall under one of the commercial animal services.

00:17:58.760 --> 00:18:03.920
 Additionally, you'll note that the both commercial animal service indoor and outdoor follow a

00:18:03.920 --> 00:18:08.200
 very similar pattern to the veterinary clinic-allowed zoning districts.

00:18:08.200 --> 00:18:12.560
 The major difference being that the commercial animal service outdoor is not allowed in the

00:18:12.560 --> 00:18:16.680
 MN or MD zoning districts.

00:18:16.680 --> 00:18:19.920
 With these specific standards, they are rather wordy, but there are some key takeaways that

00:18:19.920 --> 00:18:22.040
 I'd like for you to get from this slide.

00:18:22.040 --> 00:18:27.160
 First, with residential adjacency, we do establish distance minimums as well as time requirements

00:18:27.160 --> 00:18:32.800
 on the outdoor elements that are allowed and adjacent to a residential zoning district.

00:18:32.800 --> 00:18:37.840
 Additionally, you'll note under the commercial animal service indoor definition is where

00:18:37.840 --> 00:18:42.200
 we make the differentiation between the indoor and outdoor definitions.

00:18:42.200 --> 00:18:47.040
 More than 50% of a proposed business may be outdoor if the business will be proposed as

00:18:47.040 --> 00:18:49.920
 an indoor land use.

00:18:49.920 --> 00:18:54.960
 Additionally, no provision is intended to prevent the use of an outdoor area for animal

00:18:54.960 --> 00:18:59.640
 relief or the provision of that area.

00:18:59.640 --> 00:19:03.480
 With the definitions to commercial stable as well as personal service general, you'll

00:19:03.480 --> 00:19:08.240
 note that both of these are fairly minor in nature, just some clarifying language.

00:19:08.240 --> 00:19:13.000
 As previously discussed, we do remove the kennel definition.

00:19:13.000 --> 00:19:16.880
 With these specific standards, we do make two minor additions to the veterinary clinic.

00:19:16.880 --> 00:19:22.580
 These are both related to livestock veterinary care on site, which we do know is rare and

00:19:22.580 --> 00:19:25.720
 typically these animals are treated on their home property.

00:19:25.720 --> 00:19:31.880
 However, we do feel that these are important for the businesses to be protected in those

00:19:31.880 --> 00:19:34.880
 areas.

00:19:34.880 --> 00:19:38.140
 With the minimum required off-street parking, you'll note that the commercial animal services

00:19:38.140 --> 00:19:42.640
 are both lumped into one category and these are consistent with the veterinary clinic,

00:19:42.640 --> 00:19:47.680
 one space per 500 square feet of gross floor area.

00:19:47.680 --> 00:19:51.960
 We did send out 12 929 notices per state requirements.

00:19:51.960 --> 00:19:54.880
 We received three in opposition and one in favor.

00:19:54.880 --> 00:19:58.820
 On the right side, you'll see the businesses that received this notice.

00:19:58.820 --> 00:20:03.000
 These businesses are, per the ordinance, going to be considered as conforming businesses

00:20:03.000 --> 00:20:06.760
 and will be allowed to continue their use as they are today and there will be no effect

00:20:06.760 --> 00:20:12.140
 from this proposal to their operation of their business as they stand today.

00:20:12.140 --> 00:20:19.120
 This update does meet the criteria for approval set out in section 2.7d and staff does recommend

00:20:19.120 --> 00:20:22.480
 approval of this proposal as it does meet those criteria for approval.

00:20:22.480 --> 00:20:25.480
 I'll stand for any questions.

00:20:25.480 --> 00:20:28.240
 Thank you, Bryce.

00:20:28.240 --> 00:20:29.240
 Questions?

00:20:29.240 --> 00:20:32.840
 Bryce, I guess I've got a quick question as you called out these businesses that would

00:20:32.840 --> 00:20:37.400
 be allowed to continue running as they are today.

00:20:37.400 --> 00:20:40.560
 That's not actually in this ordinance, though, correct?

00:20:40.560 --> 00:20:42.800
 It's not written in the ordinance.

00:20:42.800 --> 00:20:43.800
 Is that?

00:20:43.800 --> 00:20:44.800
 The specific businesses?

00:20:44.800 --> 00:20:45.800
 Yes, ma'am.

00:20:45.800 --> 00:20:48.000
 It's going to be in the actual legal numbers.

00:20:48.000 --> 00:20:49.000
 Yes, ma'am.

00:20:49.000 --> 00:20:50.000
 Excellent.

00:20:50.000 --> 00:20:51.000
 That's what I wanted to know.

00:20:51.000 --> 00:20:52.000
 Thank you.

00:20:52.000 --> 00:20:54.560
 Other questions for Bryce?

00:20:54.560 --> 00:20:55.560
 Okay.

00:20:55.560 --> 00:20:56.560
 Thank you.

00:20:56.560 --> 00:20:57.560
 This is a public hearing.

00:20:57.560 --> 00:21:00.560
 I do have a few cards in front of me.

00:21:00.560 --> 00:21:06.120
 First one being Charles Lee.

00:21:06.120 --> 00:21:07.120
 Good evening.

00:21:07.120 --> 00:21:09.680
 If you'll state your name, your time will begin.

00:21:09.680 --> 00:21:10.680
 Good evening.

00:21:10.680 --> 00:21:12.040
 My name is Charles Lee.

00:21:12.040 --> 00:21:18.280
 I just want to say that I'm against this proposal because as far as I know, there has been no

00:21:18.280 --> 00:21:22.120
 complaints against these businesses at all, zero complaints.

00:21:22.120 --> 00:21:26.800
 I don't understand why we're trying to create a whole new regulatory system on businesses

00:21:26.800 --> 00:21:31.080
 that the community is not complaining there's any problem or issues that's going on.

00:21:31.080 --> 00:21:35.920
 This is just look like you're just trying to do a sledgehammer to the regulatory system

00:21:35.920 --> 00:21:38.760
 on the people for no good reason at all.

00:21:38.760 --> 00:21:43.440
 If there was complaints and things of that nature, then I would see, I understand there

00:21:43.440 --> 00:21:45.800
 might be need for regulations.

00:21:45.800 --> 00:21:52.000
 It just completely flies in the face of self-governance because this country is based on the principle

00:21:52.000 --> 00:21:53.000
 of self-governance.

00:21:53.000 --> 00:22:00.000
 It wasn't just like self-government away from Britain, but it was also individual self-government

00:22:00.000 --> 00:22:05.640
 that everybody governs themselves and as long as I'm not causing any problems with my neighbor,

00:22:05.640 --> 00:22:08.240
 the government should just stay out of my business.

00:22:08.240 --> 00:22:14.600
 I don't understand why you're just creating a whole system for no good reason at all.

00:22:14.600 --> 00:22:18.880
 I just find it personally objectable and that's pretty much all I have to say.

00:22:18.880 --> 00:22:25.040
 I move for this not to be approved at all, thank you.

00:22:25.040 --> 00:22:27.940
 Thank you Mr. Lee for sharing your thoughts.

00:22:27.940 --> 00:22:34.200
 Next card I have is Bobby Self.

00:22:34.200 --> 00:22:35.200
 Hello there.

00:22:35.200 --> 00:22:38.720
 If you'll give us your name, your time will begin, you'll have four minutes.

00:22:38.720 --> 00:22:45.320
 Okay, my name is Bobby Self, 7800 East McKinney, Club K9.

00:22:45.320 --> 00:22:48.960
 Now I'm trying to find it because I didn't find it over there, but I got it right here.

00:22:48.960 --> 00:23:02.880
 If you'd like to put the eye on the sky on it, there it is right there.

00:23:02.880 --> 00:23:03.880
 Thank you.

00:23:03.880 --> 00:23:04.880
 I'm going to ask Cathy to check.

00:23:04.880 --> 00:23:05.880
 Oh, okay.

00:23:05.880 --> 00:23:06.880
 That's okay.

00:23:06.880 --> 00:23:07.880
 I can just read it.

00:23:07.880 --> 00:23:08.880
 I can just read it.

00:23:08.880 --> 00:23:09.880
 It's cool.

00:23:09.880 --> 00:23:10.880
 But it's from y'all's paper.

00:23:10.880 --> 00:23:11.880
 They just did it.

00:23:11.880 --> 00:23:18.480
 Okay, yes, I agree with others as well.

00:23:18.480 --> 00:23:25.060
 But the verbiage, let's try to reduce the verbiage or get with whomever in the state

00:23:25.060 --> 00:23:33.820
 level through our mayor, city manager, whomever and push up because when we receive information

00:23:33.820 --> 00:23:37.800
 such as this, the City of Denton Planning Zoning Commission is holding a hearing that

00:23:37.800 --> 00:23:44.640
 will determine whether you may lose the right to continue using your property for its current

00:23:44.640 --> 00:23:47.480
 use.

00:23:47.480 --> 00:23:51.360
 Now this is, I'm told it's from the state level.

00:23:51.360 --> 00:23:54.760
 It's nothing that you could have done or nothing that possibly come from our departments

00:23:54.760 --> 00:24:03.200
 here in the city, but that really put a burden on us mentally.

00:24:03.200 --> 00:24:08.880
 Okay, well anyway, yeah, I like the comment.

00:24:08.880 --> 00:24:10.760
 I really did.

00:24:10.760 --> 00:24:15.440
 We do need a little bit of self-governing and if it's just a title change, that's great.

00:24:15.440 --> 00:24:21.240
 But if it jumps into where you have to be licensed and such as that, that might get

00:24:21.240 --> 00:24:23.400
 a little bit crazy down the road.

00:24:23.400 --> 00:24:27.640
 But overall, I can deal with it because it's just like the hot dog guy.

00:24:27.640 --> 00:24:32.320
 You don't sell a good hot dog, you're not going to get a repeat customer.

00:24:32.320 --> 00:24:39.040
 So I think if we're in business this long, a little verbiage change here and there, that

00:24:39.040 --> 00:24:41.760
 would be all right for me.

00:24:41.760 --> 00:24:46.640
 But if it gets into licensing and such as that, I don't know about all that.

00:24:46.640 --> 00:24:48.560
 But anyway, thank you.

00:24:48.560 --> 00:24:49.960
 Thank you very much.

00:24:49.960 --> 00:24:56.360
 Tina, I'm going to call on you because this did come up in work session and we're going

00:24:56.360 --> 00:25:01.340
 to go ahead and yeah, just clarify here at this meeting if you could about the notices

00:25:01.340 --> 00:25:04.560
 that we do have to give out.

00:25:04.560 --> 00:25:05.560
 Yes.

00:25:05.560 --> 00:25:12.160
 So the letter that we had to send you with the language and the bold font is actually

00:25:12.160 --> 00:25:15.340
 a requirement of state law.

00:25:15.340 --> 00:25:20.040
 We try to add additional information in the letter to hopefully address resident concerns

00:25:20.040 --> 00:25:25.200
 or property owner concerns, but I don't disagree with you that that language is pretty tough

00:25:25.200 --> 00:25:30.560
 when it says that you may lose the right to your business or the ability to utilize your

00:25:30.560 --> 00:25:35.560
 property with the ordinance amendment that we're doing this evening.

00:25:35.560 --> 00:25:41.720
 As Bryce mentioned at the beginning in his presentation, we realized that there are businesses

00:25:41.720 --> 00:25:48.560
 that provide boarding services as well as many other services for domestic animals that

00:25:48.560 --> 00:25:55.520
 we're having difficulty making a determination in our current zoning regulations about where

00:25:55.520 --> 00:26:02.000
 to allow those businesses to occur because our zoning ordinance references if you're

00:26:02.000 --> 00:26:07.680
 providing grooming services, so that's pretty clear, but being that the services that are

00:26:07.680 --> 00:26:15.220
 available for animals today have expanded, I myself am a user of similar type services,

00:26:15.220 --> 00:26:18.920
 we needed to clean up our ordinance to be able to help better address that.

00:26:18.920 --> 00:26:25.440
 So we've also included language in our proposed ordinance where our existing businesses would

00:26:25.440 --> 00:26:31.120
 be determined to be conforming so you would not fall into a non-conforming situation,

00:26:31.120 --> 00:26:38.140
 and Bryce, keep me honest on this, but so we've tried to recognize that with our existing

00:26:38.140 --> 00:26:42.120
 businesses that we've put some additional protections in place to allow you to continue

00:26:42.120 --> 00:26:45.800
 operating and be conforming in accordance with the zoning.

00:26:45.800 --> 00:26:54.080
 But that letter, my apologies, we're required to send that out and it is not friendly wording

00:26:54.080 --> 00:27:00.520
 unfortunately, so like I said, my apologies, but we have to follow state law and hence

00:27:00.520 --> 00:27:03.120
 why that letter has to be sent that way.

00:27:03.120 --> 00:27:06.600
 Thank you, Tina, I did an explanation.

00:27:06.600 --> 00:27:09.680
 Commissioner Prude, I did see your name, did you need to speak?

00:27:09.680 --> 00:27:14.080
 I think I'll hold it until we've heard the rest of the public hearing.

00:27:14.080 --> 00:27:15.720
 Okay, very good.

00:27:15.720 --> 00:27:18.720
 So this is a public hearing, I don't have any other cards in front of me, but is there

00:27:18.720 --> 00:27:20.120
 anyone else wishing to speak?

00:27:20.120 --> 00:27:21.880
 Sure, come on forward.

00:27:21.880 --> 00:27:26.160
 You can fill out a card afterward and if you'll give us your name, your time will begin.

00:27:26.160 --> 00:27:27.160
 Hi.

00:27:27.160 --> 00:27:32.520
 Hi, my name is Bruce Brown and I have a commercial property on Market Street property for one

00:27:32.520 --> 00:27:37.720
 of my tenants, Collar Clubs Academy has been there three and a half years and trains dogs

00:27:37.720 --> 00:27:43.960
 at that area and I've read the rules and regulations that you've come up with and it is air conditioned.

00:27:43.960 --> 00:27:48.960
 One rule that they have is you cannot expand the property even though you have an existing

00:27:48.960 --> 00:27:54.600
 business, if you grow, unless you own all the buildings next to you, you own it personally,

00:27:54.600 --> 00:28:02.360
 you can't expand and I'm trying to accommodate my tenant as she has more growth coming along.

00:28:02.360 --> 00:28:05.280
 Where can I put her, expand her business?

00:28:05.280 --> 00:28:11.360
 You now have a rule in the stipulation where the training area, it has to be 150 feet away

00:28:11.360 --> 00:28:12.760
 from any commercial property.

00:28:12.760 --> 00:28:18.320
 Now, I have nine acres in that location, so I have an area where they do train and it's

00:28:18.320 --> 00:28:25.360
 150 feet away from any commercial property, but if you add up the size of that building,

00:28:25.360 --> 00:28:31.680
 which is a 40 by, excuse me, it's a 60 by 75 and you add a 150 foot requirement on each

00:28:31.680 --> 00:28:35.640
 side that would require over three acres of land.

00:28:35.640 --> 00:28:39.240
 If I didn't have a facility where she could train, I'd have to have over three acres of

00:28:39.240 --> 00:28:43.920
 land on that size building with that requirement, so I don't know how anybody else is going

00:28:43.920 --> 00:28:47.040
 to get in the kennel business in the city limits if they're going to have to have three

00:28:47.040 --> 00:28:54.840
 acres of land for that, but my request is with my tenant, can I expand the property

00:28:54.840 --> 00:29:00.240
 because whether she has 4,000 square feet or 8,000 square feet would make no difference

00:29:00.240 --> 00:29:07.600
 since she's got the training area with 150 foot away from any commercial property.

00:29:07.600 --> 00:29:11.000
 Am I making sense?

00:29:11.000 --> 00:29:18.080
 Possibly, and I'll get staff in on this to see if they can add for us and if they understand

00:29:18.080 --> 00:29:21.280
 what you're asking and what you're asking for clarification on.

00:29:21.280 --> 00:29:22.960
 Yeah, Bryce, that'd be great.

00:29:22.960 --> 00:29:23.960
 Thank you.

00:29:23.960 --> 00:29:24.960
 Thank you.

00:29:24.960 --> 00:29:25.960
 Absolutely.

00:29:25.960 --> 00:29:30.520
 So, I believe the 150 foot requirement, which is being mentioned, is in the use of specific

00:29:30.520 --> 00:29:31.520
 standards.

00:29:31.520 --> 00:29:36.800
 It is when it's adjacent to or within 1,000 feet of a residential zoning district.

00:29:36.800 --> 00:29:40.640
 I'm not familiar with the exact parcel that we're talking about in this instance.

00:29:40.640 --> 00:29:44.680
 It's something that we put in that is common for other municipalities and things of that

00:29:44.680 --> 00:29:51.960
 sort to regulate both sound, stench, noise, and just general clean air, as well as the

00:29:51.960 --> 00:29:53.440
 litter that can come with some of these areas.

00:29:53.440 --> 00:29:54.440
 Right.

00:29:54.440 --> 00:29:56.640
 This is adjacent to residential zoning district.

00:29:56.640 --> 00:30:00.640
 It's adjacent to a residential zoning district.

00:30:00.640 --> 00:30:01.640
 Right.

00:30:01.640 --> 00:30:02.640
 Okay.

00:30:02.640 --> 00:30:04.920
 And your question had to do with other commercial properties?

00:30:04.920 --> 00:30:13.680
 If you could come up to the microphone, yeah, we're recording, so we need.

00:30:13.680 --> 00:30:18.440
 The requirement, and correct me if I'm wrong, you have to have a training area or a exercise

00:30:18.440 --> 00:30:22.080
 area that has to be 150 feet away from any commercial property.

00:30:22.080 --> 00:30:23.080
 No, sir.

00:30:23.080 --> 00:30:25.080
 So, if you're within, if you're adjacent to-

00:30:25.080 --> 00:30:26.080
 Bryce, I need you at the mic.

00:30:26.080 --> 00:30:27.080
 Thanks.

00:30:27.080 --> 00:30:31.080
 If you're adjacent to a residential zoning district, that's when that requirement would

00:30:31.080 --> 00:30:32.080
 kick in.

00:30:32.080 --> 00:30:34.800
 It does not relate to commercial areas or commercial properties.

00:30:34.800 --> 00:30:37.560
 It's only when adjacent to a residential zoning district.

00:30:37.560 --> 00:30:42.880
 There's no 150-foot minimum?

00:30:42.880 --> 00:30:47.280
 Not if we're referring to a commercial zoning district, no, sir.

00:30:47.280 --> 00:30:48.280
 Okay.

00:30:48.280 --> 00:30:49.280
 All right.

00:30:49.280 --> 00:30:51.280
 Now, it does state- Oh, I need the microphone.

00:30:51.280 --> 00:30:54.200
 It does state they cannot expand their business?

00:30:54.200 --> 00:30:56.240
 No, sir.

00:30:56.240 --> 00:31:02.400
 I'm not sure which portion you're referring to, but as it exists today, assuming that it

00:31:02.400 --> 00:31:06.560
 exists, well, first of all, the business will be a conforming use, so the business is allowed

00:31:06.560 --> 00:31:07.560
 to operate as it is.

00:31:07.560 --> 00:31:13.280
 When it comes to expansion, they will be required to meet these additional use-specific standards

00:31:13.280 --> 00:31:17.520
 that we're setting forth, but if you're adjacent, there's only, again, one adjacent to a residential

00:31:17.520 --> 00:31:18.520
 zoning district.

00:31:18.520 --> 00:31:23.600
 It doesn't have to do, you can see on the screen here, this is when located inside over

00:31:23.600 --> 00:31:28.800
 within 1,000 feet of a residential zoning district.

00:31:28.800 --> 00:31:35.880
 There's no specific standard for one adjacent to a commercial zoning district.

00:31:35.880 --> 00:31:40.320
 Okay, thank you.

00:31:40.320 --> 00:31:44.600
 I guess with one thing he mentioned, I'm not sure if the business that we're discussing

00:31:44.600 --> 00:31:47.520
 is on the list.

00:31:47.520 --> 00:31:48.840
 It is on the list?

00:31:48.840 --> 00:31:49.840
 Yes.

00:31:49.840 --> 00:31:50.840
 Okay.

00:31:50.840 --> 00:32:00.600
 In regard to expansion, it is a conforming use, so would the business be allowed to expand?

00:32:00.600 --> 00:32:04.880
 It would need to adhere to the new use-specific standards that are being set forth.

00:32:04.880 --> 00:32:09.240
 The difference in non-conforming and conforming in this situation are that if a business were

00:32:09.240 --> 00:32:16.520
 in our non-conforming use standards, I believe it's chapter 1.6, we do require that if a

00:32:16.520 --> 00:32:20.440
 business that's non-conforming burns down or is destroyed more than 50%, they're not

00:32:20.440 --> 00:32:23.840
 able to rebuild that without being brought up to current standards.

00:32:23.840 --> 00:32:29.320
 However, these being deemed conforming uses, if that building, or God forbid something

00:32:29.320 --> 00:32:33.600
 were to happen in that instance, the business would be able to reconstruct as it was originally

00:32:33.600 --> 00:32:34.600
 constructed.

00:32:34.600 --> 00:32:39.240
 Or in this situation, just want to expand because business is booming and they want

00:32:39.240 --> 00:32:40.240
 to expand.

00:32:40.240 --> 00:32:45.520
 They would be allowed to expand, but would have to then adhere to whatever, yeah, those

00:32:45.520 --> 00:32:48.240
 use-specific standards that are in this ordinance.

00:32:48.240 --> 00:32:49.240
 Yes, ma'am.

00:32:49.240 --> 00:32:50.240
 Okay.

00:32:50.240 --> 00:32:53.520
 Thank you for the explanation.

00:32:53.520 --> 00:32:55.000
 This is a public hearing.

00:32:55.000 --> 00:32:58.680
 I don't have any more cards, but if there's anyone wishing to speak, yes, please come

00:32:58.680 --> 00:33:03.400
 down and if you will state your name, your four minutes will begin.

00:33:03.400 --> 00:33:04.400
 Hello.

00:33:04.400 --> 00:33:05.400
 Hi.

00:33:05.400 --> 00:33:06.400
 Yes, ma'am.

00:33:06.400 --> 00:33:07.400
 My name's Kendra Angel.

00:33:07.400 --> 00:33:13.160
 I own Shed Pet Salon at the corner of Elm, and we've been in business for three years.

00:33:13.160 --> 00:33:14.720
 Everything's been going real well.

00:33:14.720 --> 00:33:21.120
 I do have dogs that are older, and I worry about them when they stay other places like

00:33:21.120 --> 00:33:26.960
 in a typical kennel situation, so I've talked to zoning and everything.

00:33:26.960 --> 00:33:34.280
 We're moving to 820 this week, and then I got this notice, so it scared me, but I talked

00:33:34.280 --> 00:33:41.480
 to them about doing boarding, in-home boarding to expand to maybe 10 dogs max, but we're

00:33:41.480 --> 00:33:44.680
 still continuing the grooming downstairs.

00:33:44.680 --> 00:33:47.480
 Is this going to affect my business?

00:33:47.480 --> 00:33:48.480
 Okay.

00:33:48.480 --> 00:33:54.680
 I'm going to bring Bryce up, our expert here, to answer that question hopefully.

00:33:54.680 --> 00:33:55.680
 Yes, ma'am.

00:33:55.680 --> 00:34:00.760
 Since the new definitions will refer to grooming, you will fall under either commercial animal

00:34:00.760 --> 00:34:03.880
 services indoor, it sounds like that's what you'll be, or potentially commercial animal

00:34:03.880 --> 00:34:04.880
 services outdoor.

00:34:04.880 --> 00:34:07.600
 So you'll fall under one of those two definition categories.

00:34:07.600 --> 00:34:08.600
 Yes, ma'am.

00:34:08.600 --> 00:34:09.600
 Okay.

00:34:09.600 --> 00:34:10.600
 Thank you.

00:34:10.600 --> 00:34:11.600
 Thank you.

00:34:11.600 --> 00:34:12.600
 Thank you, Bryce.

00:34:12.600 --> 00:34:13.600
 Yeah.

00:34:13.600 --> 00:34:14.600
 Okay.

00:34:14.600 --> 00:34:27.920
 Before we hear any more speakers, Tina did a little research on our speaker before this,

00:34:27.920 --> 00:34:30.040
 so we'll just shed a little bit more light there.

00:34:30.040 --> 00:34:37.240
 So the property that is at, I think I caught the address, 3822 Market Street, is that correct?

00:34:37.240 --> 00:34:41.360
 So in looking at that, you're surrounded by commercial zoning.

00:34:41.360 --> 00:34:45.360
 So you do not have any residential adjacent zoned properties.

00:34:45.360 --> 00:34:51.140
 So again, as Bryce explained earlier, that minimum 150 foot separation requirement comes

00:34:51.140 --> 00:34:57.320
 into play when your property is adjacent to or within 150 feet of a residential zone property.

00:34:57.320 --> 00:35:01.540
 So in your case, you're surrounded by commercial zoning.

00:35:01.540 --> 00:35:03.640
 Thank you very much, Tina.

00:35:03.640 --> 00:35:05.140
 This is a public hearing.

00:35:05.140 --> 00:35:09.520
 Is there anyone else wishing to speak on this item who has not already?

00:35:09.520 --> 00:35:10.520
 Okay.

00:35:10.520 --> 00:35:16.880
 I was having another question, but we don't really know how to answer that.

00:35:16.880 --> 00:35:17.880
 You know what?

00:35:17.880 --> 00:35:20.440
 I'm going to let you, you come up and ask the question.

00:35:20.440 --> 00:35:21.440
 How's that?

00:35:21.440 --> 00:35:23.480
 And then we'll see if we can get you an answer.

00:35:23.480 --> 00:35:24.480
 Right.

00:35:24.480 --> 00:35:30.720
 Or within the newest residential areas going into, they have disturbed the ground.

00:35:30.720 --> 00:35:36.440
 They are going to build half a million dollar homes and by the 500s of them.

00:35:36.440 --> 00:35:39.440
 Do we meet that thousand foot?

00:35:39.440 --> 00:35:43.960
 150 or a thousand?

00:35:43.960 --> 00:35:47.920
 So it's a thousand feet to win, is when that requirement does kick in.

00:35:47.920 --> 00:35:51.600
 As you exist today, we are not going to ask that you change anything.

00:35:51.600 --> 00:35:54.800
 Whether you're within that or not, you are, as you exist today, deemed a conforming use.

00:35:54.800 --> 00:35:55.800
 We're all good.

00:35:55.800 --> 00:35:57.200
 We're going to come in and make you change anything.

00:35:57.200 --> 00:35:58.200
 All good.

00:35:58.200 --> 00:35:59.200
 Thank you.

00:35:59.200 --> 00:36:00.200
 Thank you very much.

00:36:00.200 --> 00:36:01.200
 Thank you.

00:36:01.200 --> 00:36:02.200
 Okay.

00:36:02.200 --> 00:36:07.560
 Anyone else wishing to speak on this public hearing?

00:36:07.560 --> 00:36:09.600
 Okay.

00:36:09.600 --> 00:36:10.600
 Seeing none.

00:36:10.600 --> 00:36:11.680
 I will go ahead and close the public hearing.

00:36:11.680 --> 00:36:17.800
 I will go ahead and open the dais for a motion or discussion.

00:36:17.800 --> 00:36:18.800
 Commissioner Perrett.

00:36:18.800 --> 00:36:20.680
 Thank you, chair.

00:36:20.680 --> 00:36:25.880
 Brief question for staff, just to make sure everybody leaves today with a good understanding

00:36:25.880 --> 00:36:31.260
 so that when we show up at council, there's no confusion.

00:36:31.260 --> 00:36:35.280
 The example that we had one commenter talk about, I think it was more toward the center

00:36:35.280 --> 00:36:39.360
 of town, might have some boarding.

00:36:39.360 --> 00:36:44.720
 The answer you gave was assuming that that boarding would be inside boarding, that there

00:36:44.720 --> 00:36:48.440
 wouldn't be an outdoor play area for the pets.

00:36:48.440 --> 00:36:50.840
 Is that your understanding as well?

00:36:50.840 --> 00:36:53.880
 Am I correct in interpreting that?

00:36:53.880 --> 00:36:58.320
 Sure, just based on the very brief conversation we just had, I would assume that would hit

00:36:58.320 --> 00:36:59.680
 the indoor definition.

00:36:59.680 --> 00:37:07.640
 Again, we do have some zoning districts that allow the outdoor primary use if that is what

00:37:07.640 --> 00:37:08.640
 is proposed.

00:37:08.640 --> 00:37:09.640
 Okay.

00:37:09.640 --> 00:37:10.640
 Thank you.

00:37:10.640 --> 00:37:11.640
 Yeah.

00:37:11.640 --> 00:37:20.680
 I'm thankful for staff bringing this and I'm happy to keep going on it.

00:37:20.680 --> 00:37:31.440
 I will say that my guess is less than the majority of these types of businesses right

00:37:31.440 --> 00:37:39.080
 now are actually conforming, and so we have a lot of reasons why expansion would be made

00:37:39.080 --> 00:37:46.480
 more complicated, whether it be parking minimums or setbacks or et cetera.

00:37:46.480 --> 00:37:58.400
 I think these are reasonable restrictions though, and so let's see how it goes.

00:37:58.400 --> 00:38:08.040
 It makes me a little scared that there's SUPs required in seemingly a lot of cases for situations

00:38:08.040 --> 00:38:19.120
 where we want our pets and our animals, especially in light of recent situations, to be able

00:38:19.120 --> 00:38:24.440
 to have access to exercise and that sort of thing.

00:38:24.440 --> 00:38:31.280
 We'll see where this goes, but I don't see this as a large departure from how the old

00:38:31.280 --> 00:38:34.920
 regulations would have been attempted to been applied.

00:38:34.920 --> 00:38:38.120
 I see it more as a clarification.

00:38:38.120 --> 00:38:46.080
 With that said, I continue to see with our code that people are generally restricted

00:38:46.080 --> 00:38:52.760
 from expansion by nature of the last time they did construction was 20 years ago and

00:38:52.760 --> 00:38:56.680
 we had a different zoning code then with different requirements.

00:38:56.680 --> 00:38:59.400
 So that, yeah, thank you.

00:38:59.400 --> 00:39:00.400
 Sure.

00:39:00.400 --> 00:39:07.560
 Anything else, discussion or a motion?

00:39:07.560 --> 00:39:11.320
 I'll go ahead and move approval on this item.

00:39:11.320 --> 00:39:12.320
 Commission approve it?

00:39:12.320 --> 00:39:13.320
 Okay.

00:39:13.320 --> 00:39:17.160
 Got a first and a second for approval discussion.

00:39:17.160 --> 00:39:19.080
 I'll go ahead and take a moment.

00:39:19.080 --> 00:39:20.440
 First of all, thanks staff.

00:39:20.440 --> 00:39:28.840
 Bryce, I think your information was extremely thorough, your attention to detail, the knowledge

00:39:28.840 --> 00:39:35.280
 that you have gained in putting this together has been tremendous and certainly helps us

00:39:35.280 --> 00:39:38.160
 understand exactly what's going on here.

00:39:38.160 --> 00:39:42.640
 Thank you for sharing your thoughts, everyone.

00:39:42.640 --> 00:39:48.720
 I wish that, and it's not just me, I'm sure staff wishes that those scary notices that

00:39:48.720 --> 00:39:54.820
 we are required to go out, it didn't have to go out, truly staff has no, there's no

00:39:54.820 --> 00:40:01.900
 option to do that, we'd be sued by the state if it was found out that we were not adhering

00:40:01.900 --> 00:40:07.000
 to that, nobody wants that, we've got to do it.

00:40:07.000 --> 00:40:14.000
 So unfortunately, yes, that mental anguish that unfortunately that you had to endure

00:40:14.000 --> 00:40:20.880
 and sorry about that, we hope that with the communication that you were able to have with

00:40:20.880 --> 00:40:29.640
 staff who's always available, always, to talk to the public, anybody on staff in this department,

00:40:29.640 --> 00:40:33.960
 probably throughout our city, but this is the department that I'm most familiar with,

00:40:33.960 --> 00:40:41.160
 will be willing to talk you through any questions that you have when things like this come up.

00:40:41.160 --> 00:40:47.520
 Secondly, I understand the confusion, I understand the thoughts of yes, we should govern ourselves

00:40:47.520 --> 00:40:51.440
 in a world that we could do that.

00:40:51.440 --> 00:40:56.920
 The other thing that this does, it's not really just governance, it's what our vice chair

00:40:56.920 --> 00:41:02.220
 already mentioned with clarifying things, you know, the world of animals has done nothing

00:41:02.220 --> 00:41:03.800
 but grown.

00:41:03.800 --> 00:41:08.760
 How people take care of their animals and what they want for their animals with dog,

00:41:08.760 --> 00:41:17.160
 with daycare and grooming and everything and you know, it's just done nothing but grow,

00:41:17.160 --> 00:41:22.000
 which is wonderful, but that means there's more businesses that want to do this and we

00:41:22.000 --> 00:41:27.160
 have things in our code that doesn't allow staff to right now know how to guide these

00:41:27.160 --> 00:41:28.160
 people.

00:41:28.160 --> 00:41:33.720
 We don't have it defined, we've got it in descriptions where it doesn't belong like

00:41:33.720 --> 00:41:38.160
 personal grooming services, you know, it's something that does need to be clarified so

00:41:38.160 --> 00:41:43.140
 that not only our existing businesses, which staff has done an exceptional job calling

00:41:43.140 --> 00:41:51.240
 out and making conforming, but it does allow these new businesses to come in and know exactly,

00:41:51.240 --> 00:41:57.300
 you know, what they need to be doing for the animal business that they're in.

00:41:57.300 --> 00:42:00.320
 So thank you again for coming out.

00:42:00.320 --> 00:42:03.800
 Commissioner Pruitt, I saw you, yep, go ahead.

00:42:03.800 --> 00:42:10.200
 Yeah, just wanted to point out and staff has more accurate dates, feel free to correct

00:42:10.200 --> 00:42:14.580
 me, but I don't think we have city manager's representation.

00:42:14.580 --> 00:42:21.480
 I know council in general gives direction for the state legislative priorities at some

00:42:21.480 --> 00:42:27.160
 time before the state legislative session starts.

00:42:27.160 --> 00:42:34.960
 My advice would be to look on the council agendas for that happening at work session

00:42:34.960 --> 00:42:40.440
 times, sometime at the end of the year or the beginning of next year.

00:42:40.440 --> 00:42:41.440
 Thank you for that.

00:42:41.440 --> 00:42:47.240
 Speaking of, I understand, but thank you for coming tonight.

00:42:47.240 --> 00:42:54.520
 And also, can we get the date that this is going to council?

00:42:54.520 --> 00:42:57.000
 We have not scheduled this yet for city council's consideration.

00:42:57.000 --> 00:42:58.000
 Okay.

00:42:58.000 --> 00:42:59.000
 All right.

00:42:59.000 --> 00:43:04.400
 So it will be on their agenda, should, depending on what happens here, I suppose.

00:43:04.400 --> 00:43:08.600
 And I was going to add, if any of the business representations or representatives that are

00:43:08.600 --> 00:43:13.840
 here this evening want to give your email address or phone number, your contact information

00:43:13.840 --> 00:43:17.320
 to Bryce, we can follow up with you and let you know when once that is scheduled.

00:43:17.320 --> 00:43:19.040
 Yes, that's a great idea.

00:43:19.040 --> 00:43:20.040
 Thank you very much.

00:43:20.040 --> 00:43:21.040
 Do you know?

00:43:21.040 --> 00:43:22.040
 Okay.

00:43:22.040 --> 00:43:23.120
 We've got a first and a second for approval.

00:43:23.120 --> 00:43:24.480
 Any other discussion?

00:43:24.480 --> 00:43:25.480
 Okay.

00:43:25.480 --> 00:43:33.560
 Let's go ahead and vote, please.

00:43:33.560 --> 00:43:38.740
 That motion carries for zero moving that on to council.

00:43:38.740 --> 00:43:41.200
 Thank you, Bryce, for being available here.

00:43:41.200 --> 00:43:42.400
 Appreciate that.

00:43:42.400 --> 00:43:44.840
 Next on our agenda is the planning and zoning matrix.

00:43:44.840 --> 00:43:49.560
 I'll go ahead and turn that over to Tina.

00:43:49.560 --> 00:43:51.040
 Thank you, Chair Ellis.

00:43:51.040 --> 00:43:55.320
 So regarding the matrix itself, I just wanted to let the commission know one of the things

00:43:55.320 --> 00:43:59.360
 that we are actually going to add to the matrix and it's sort of a follow up from a request

00:43:59.360 --> 00:44:03.140
 that Chair Ellis had made regarding some data related to multifamily.

00:44:03.140 --> 00:44:07.760
 So we're going to add a discussion item for work session consideration to the matrix.

00:44:07.760 --> 00:44:12.760
 We are looking at having that at your second meeting in October and being able to present

00:44:12.760 --> 00:44:13.760
 that data.

00:44:13.760 --> 00:44:20.480
 So you'll see that being added in terms of city council's actions on cases that you've

00:44:20.480 --> 00:44:26.520
 seen from since your last meeting back on September 17th.

00:44:26.520 --> 00:44:30.280
 We had a very generous agenda with items on there.

00:44:30.280 --> 00:44:34.440
 So happy to report the adoption of the downtown, or the design downtown Denton plan.

00:44:34.440 --> 00:44:37.320
 Make sure I call it by the correct name.

00:44:37.320 --> 00:44:41.160
 Council unanimously approved the plan.

00:44:41.160 --> 00:44:44.320
 I know the planning and zoning commission spent a lot of time and effort with that.

00:44:44.320 --> 00:44:47.960
 And Zoe, thank you for all of your involvement as well as the community's involvement in

00:44:47.960 --> 00:44:52.120
 the preparation of that plan because we did some extensive public engagement on that.

00:44:52.120 --> 00:44:53.120
 But that was approved.

00:44:53.120 --> 00:44:58.800
 So now we look forward to working on implementing the recommendations from the plan.

00:44:58.800 --> 00:45:01.060
 Other items that we had that evening.

00:45:01.060 --> 00:45:07.280
 If you recall, there were two historic or excuse me, a historic landmark designation

00:45:07.280 --> 00:45:10.800
 items that one was at 1526 Willowwood.

00:45:10.800 --> 00:45:13.740
 The other one was at 1900 Westridge Street.

00:45:13.740 --> 00:45:17.920
 Those were both approved also unanimously by city council.

00:45:17.920 --> 00:45:24.480
 Then we also had a specific use permit for multifamily use on 2.4 acres of land that

00:45:24.480 --> 00:45:29.960
 was on the south side of North Elm, approximately 560 feet east of Riney Road.

00:45:29.960 --> 00:45:35.920
 If you recall, this track was kind of triangular shape backs up to a city regional detention

00:45:35.920 --> 00:45:37.460
 pond.

00:45:37.460 --> 00:45:42.140
 So that was also approved by city council.

00:45:42.140 --> 00:45:47.480
 And then also we had the amending specific use permit for the multifamily project that

00:45:47.480 --> 00:45:52.700
 was at the southeast corner of Locust and loop 288.

00:45:52.700 --> 00:45:56.080
 And if I'm not mistaken correctly, north of Hercules drive.

00:45:56.080 --> 00:46:00.000
 That was also approved by city council.

00:46:00.000 --> 00:46:07.960
 And then short term rentals that continues to live on but a couple of updates as it relates

00:46:07.960 --> 00:46:08.960
 to that.

00:46:08.960 --> 00:46:13.320
 So last night, we were hoping to have council's consideration of that.

00:46:13.320 --> 00:46:17.400
 There's a public notice requirement that we did not satisfy that we're required to do

00:46:17.400 --> 00:46:18.400
 per state law.

00:46:18.400 --> 00:46:21.020
 So we wanted to get that corrected.

00:46:21.020 --> 00:46:26.240
 So we asked council to go ahead and continue the short term rentals discussion to the October

00:46:26.240 --> 00:46:27.480
 22nd meeting.

00:46:27.480 --> 00:46:32.840
 So we will have our formal public hearing of that proposed ordinance at that time.

00:46:32.840 --> 00:46:37.400
 Before then, though, on October 15th, we will have a work session discussion with city council

00:46:37.400 --> 00:46:42.520
 soon it's been quite some time since the ordinance was originally acted on on July 23rd that

00:46:42.520 --> 00:46:44.080
 resulted in the tie vote.

00:46:44.080 --> 00:46:47.480
 So for those of you that are interested in short term rentals, whether you're here in

00:46:47.480 --> 00:46:51.640
 the audience or maybe watching at home, I would encourage you to listen to the council

00:46:51.640 --> 00:46:54.600
 meeting on October 15th again during their work session.

00:46:54.600 --> 00:46:58.520
 And then anybody that wants to provide comments related to the ordinance may do so on October

00:46:58.520 --> 00:46:59.520
 22nd.

00:46:59.520 --> 00:47:06.160
 So and then lastly, I would also like to thank former Commissioner Jason Cole, who's usually

00:47:06.160 --> 00:47:09.440
 sitting at the very end of our dais here.

00:47:09.440 --> 00:47:12.160
 So want to thank him for all of his years of service.

00:47:12.160 --> 00:47:16.400
 I know he spent six years on the Planning and Zoning Commission and always provided very

00:47:16.400 --> 00:47:22.800
 thoughtful consideration of requests being brought before him and was a wonderful person

00:47:22.800 --> 00:47:24.320
 to be able to work with and get to know.

00:47:24.320 --> 00:47:27.400
 So we thank you for your service if you're watching at home.

00:47:27.400 --> 00:47:28.720
 And that concludes my report.

00:47:28.720 --> 00:47:30.640
 Thank you so much.

00:47:30.640 --> 00:47:32.400
 Commissioner really real.

00:47:32.400 --> 00:47:33.400
 Thank you, Chair.

00:47:33.400 --> 00:47:34.400
 Thank you, Tina.

00:47:34.400 --> 00:47:35.960
 Just a quick question on the downtown area plan.

00:47:35.960 --> 00:47:39.800
 I was only able to catch a brief segment of the city council meeting on it.

00:47:39.800 --> 00:47:44.760
 I know there was discussion at the meeting about the pool and the auditorium was that

00:47:44.760 --> 00:47:47.600
 changed at all in the final plan or the plan passed?

00:47:47.600 --> 00:47:48.600
 We had passed it.

00:47:48.600 --> 00:47:51.720
 The plan passed as the Planning and Zoning Commission had recommended.

00:47:51.720 --> 00:47:55.800
 So there was no changes made to the plan document itself.

00:47:55.800 --> 00:47:59.040
 There's always interest in the continued interest in the community with respect to the swimming

00:47:59.040 --> 00:48:00.040
 pool.

00:48:00.040 --> 00:48:07.120
 And so this plan included a couple of alternatives as the commission had seen, but as Parks Department

00:48:07.120 --> 00:48:12.360
 continues working on refining the plan for Quaker Town Park, they will have an extensive

00:48:12.360 --> 00:48:15.400
 public engagement process that they undertake at that time.

00:48:15.400 --> 00:48:19.360
 So persons are able to work with the Parks Department, provide comments and feedback

00:48:19.360 --> 00:48:24.200
 related to the pool, because I know many people within the community are emotionally attached

00:48:24.200 --> 00:48:31.360
 to that pool facility, but all of the elements that are actually in that park plan, there

00:48:31.360 --> 00:48:37.900
 will be another phase of the park planning for the Quaker Town Park property.

00:48:37.900 --> 00:48:43.760
 And so all of those items will be re-discussed, not just the swimming pool itself, but the

00:48:43.760 --> 00:48:48.120
 entire park plan layout at such point in time when the city is ready to do those improvements.

00:48:48.120 --> 00:48:49.120
 Thank you.

00:48:49.120 --> 00:48:50.120
 Absolutely.

00:48:50.120 --> 00:48:51.120
 Thank you.

00:48:51.120 --> 00:48:56.180
 Is there anything to add to the matrix?

00:48:56.180 --> 00:49:06.600
 Concluding items, I'll go ahead and state what Tina has already, and that is to thank

00:49:06.600 --> 00:49:10.400
 Commissioner Cole for his time with us.

00:49:10.400 --> 00:49:15.760
 He did serve his three terms and a little bit over that as a holdover, and we very much

00:49:15.760 --> 00:49:20.960
 appreciate the time and dedication that he gave to the role.

00:49:20.960 --> 00:49:23.640
 It was certainly a pleasure to serve with him.

00:49:23.640 --> 00:49:25.440
 So thank you, Commissioner Cole.

00:49:25.440 --> 00:49:27.200
 Very much appreciate you.

00:49:27.200 --> 00:49:28.200
 Commissioner Villarreal.

00:49:28.200 --> 00:49:29.880
 Just wanted to say ditto.

00:49:29.880 --> 00:49:32.920
 We didn't always agree, but Commissioner Cole was always a positive presence on the board,

00:49:32.920 --> 00:49:35.800
 and I know he'll be missed by everyone on the commission.

00:49:35.800 --> 00:49:36.800
 Great energy.

00:49:36.800 --> 00:49:37.800
 Yeah.

00:49:37.800 --> 00:49:38.800
 Thank you very much.

00:49:38.800 --> 00:49:39.800
 Anything else?

00:49:39.800 --> 00:49:40.800
 Concluding items?

00:49:40.800 --> 00:49:41.800
 Okay.

00:49:41.800 --> 00:49:44.680
 With that, go ahead and adjourn our meeting at 7.08 p.m.

00:49:44.680 --> 00:49:45.280
 Thank you very much.

