1
00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:16,500
 >> All right, after determining that a forum is present, the Charter Review Committee will

2
00:00:16,500 --> 00:00:24,780
 reconvene in a regular meeting on August 22nd at 6, 532 p.m. in Thompson rooms 3, 4, and

3
00:00:24,780 --> 00:00:31,200
 5 at the Development Services Center in Denny, Texas. Seeing that we have a forum, I will

4
00:00:31,200 --> 00:00:39,280
 now call the regular meeting of the Charter Committee to order at 522. We will now receive

5
00:00:39,280 --> 00:00:43,800
 comments from members of the public who wish to speak, must be present at the meeting,

6
00:00:43,800 --> 00:00:48,200
 and submit a speaker card to the staff liaison prior to the item being called. Up to five

7
00:00:48,200 --> 00:00:53,440
 speakers may speak for two minutes each on any item on the agenda. I have two cards in

8
00:00:53,440 --> 00:01:08,680
 front of me. First, Charles Lee, if you could come to that podium up there. You have two

9
00:01:08,680 --> 00:01:14,360
 minutes, and all of your staff is going to set a timer that will go off when you're doing

10
00:01:14,360 --> 00:01:15,360
 this, Earl.

11
00:01:15,360 --> 00:01:19,200
 >> Yeah, how are you doing? My name is Charles Lee. I want to start off with this quote from

12
00:01:19,200 --> 00:01:26,640
 the Federalist Papers by Brutus Bourne on October 18, 1787, and I think it's very important

13
00:01:26,640 --> 00:01:31,960
 to this committee that people know this. "But remember, when the people want to part with

14
00:01:31,960 --> 00:01:38,960
 power, they can seldom or never resume it again but by force. Many instances can be

15
00:01:38,960 --> 00:01:43,840
 produced in which the people have voluntarily increased the powers of their rulers, but

16
00:01:43,840 --> 00:01:50,320
 few, if any, in which rulers have willingly abridged their authority. This is a sufficient

17
00:01:50,320 --> 00:01:56,860
 reason to induce you to be careful in the first instance on how you deposit powers of

18
00:01:56,860 --> 00:02:01,600
 the government." You're basically saying that what we're doing right here, that whatever

19
00:02:01,600 --> 00:02:06,600
 powers we give over to the government is not only going to be for this generation, it is

20
00:02:06,600 --> 00:02:12,160
 going to be for generations going forward. And I just want people to be mindful of that.

21
00:02:12,160 --> 00:02:17,680
 And as far as the topics that are going on here, first of all, I really don't want to

22
00:02:17,680 --> 00:02:21,960
 change the city chart at all. I'm going to leave it the way it is because people have

23
00:02:21,960 --> 00:02:27,040
 agendas and they're down to power, and I know that, and you can say that you're not, it's

24
00:02:27,040 --> 00:02:34,760
 not true. I know you're basically lying. But if you are going to add council members, it

25
00:02:34,760 --> 00:02:41,520
 needs to be at a balanced rate of one to one or two to one when it comes to at-large and

26
00:02:41,520 --> 00:02:47,320
 district levels. And in the second part, I see that you want to extend the power, not

27
00:02:47,320 --> 00:02:53,600
 extend the power, but extend the term of public officials from two to three to four years.

28
00:02:53,600 --> 00:02:59,040
 I believe that's actually no-go. I think it should be two years. I'm a tightwad with money,

29
00:02:59,040 --> 00:03:03,480
 but I'm not a tightwad with elections. I think we should have more elections. If anything,

30
00:03:03,480 --> 00:03:08,280
 we should go back to one year and have more elections so we have people have more opportunity.

31
00:03:08,280 --> 00:03:13,080
 If these people aren't doing a good job, we can take them out of office at a more rapid

32
00:03:13,080 --> 00:03:16,080
 rate. Other than that, you have a nice day.

33
00:03:16,080 --> 00:03:22,520
 Are we allowed to ask questions in the video? I'll take a question.

34
00:03:22,520 --> 00:03:28,920
 I just want to comment. I don't think we're necessarily proposing what items are considered,

35
00:03:28,920 --> 00:03:33,120
 and I think you said that we're proposing to go to three or four. I think we're just

36
00:03:33,120 --> 00:03:38,200
 discussing that to see if that's a proposal that we want to vote for and go for. So I

37
00:03:38,200 --> 00:03:42,480
 don't want you to think that it has been put forth that we think we should. That's what

38
00:03:42,480 --> 00:03:46,200
 the discussion is for. All right. I just want to be mindful that I'm personally against

39
00:03:46,200 --> 00:03:50,600
 that. I think it should be two years. That's all I have to say. You have the next speaker.

40
00:03:50,600 --> 00:03:55,720
 All right. Thank you. Our next speaker is Mary Cappell.

41
00:03:55,720 --> 00:04:14,160
 Good evening. I had read a little bit of sketchy information about one of the directions of

42
00:04:14,160 --> 00:04:21,920
 the city to our review committee was going for to remove the at-large seats, and I was

43
00:04:21,920 --> 00:04:30,120
 concerned about that. And also, well, I'll mention that. So I'm strongly in favor of

44
00:04:30,120 --> 00:04:38,000
 keeping the mayoral seats and the two other city council seats at-large seats. I think

45
00:04:38,000 --> 00:04:47,600
 I read that there was concern about the at-large campaigns cost a lot of effort. And I just

46
00:04:47,600 --> 00:04:55,600
 think that that's a short, that's really not a watershed reason for eliminating those positions

47
00:04:55,600 --> 00:05:03,960
 and having to reach out to more of your constituents. But I think that's a good thing. More of the

48
00:05:03,960 --> 00:05:13,760
 citizens in the Denton area are likely to participate if they have at-large campaigns,

49
00:05:13,760 --> 00:05:19,560
 which is, of course, what we want. Each citizen has a say, not only in their district rep,

50
00:05:19,560 --> 00:05:25,440
 but also for the mayor and the two other city council member seats. We don't need to discourage

51
00:05:25,440 --> 00:05:30,760
 voter participation anymore, as it already exists. And in a city this large, we want

52
00:05:30,760 --> 00:05:38,240
 every voter or citizen to know they have some influence and say what the city covers. It's

53
00:05:38,240 --> 00:05:44,200
 worked for over four years, even as we grow. And I don't think we need to isolate our citizens

54
00:05:44,200 --> 00:05:52,840
 more. The second concern that was a rumor, and it may just be that, but it can become

55
00:05:52,840 --> 00:06:04,320
 a reality, is that perhaps UNT would be given their own voting district. That's a bad idea.

56
00:06:04,320 --> 00:06:11,040
 I remember as a college student, I was learning a lot. College students are very influenced.

57
00:06:11,040 --> 00:06:17,040
 They are ready to go, get on the bandwagon for anything the teachers tell them to do,

58
00:06:17,040 --> 00:06:26,320
 and they should not be telling the 140,000 or more citizens, they should not be determining

59
00:06:26,320 --> 00:06:31,320
 the laws and ordinances, anything on the scope. So I really do not want to see, I think they're

60
00:06:31,320 --> 00:06:36,320
 well represented. And we do want them, we do want the students to be involved and learn

61
00:06:36,320 --> 00:06:41,320
 how to be an active part of how much time we have.

62
00:06:41,320 --> 00:06:55,320
 Alright, so we have a new member of the body. Fortunately Ms. Margarita had to step down.

63
00:06:55,320 --> 00:07:00,320
 So Commissioner Trevino, you could introduce yourself and say something that you love about

64
00:07:00,320 --> 00:07:06,320
 Denden. I see that you're eating, let's go around the room and we will all just introduce

65
00:07:06,320 --> 00:07:10,320
 ourselves with our names, what she is.

66
00:07:10,320 --> 00:07:19,320
 Jeremy Fikes, moved to Denden in 1992, went to high school here, went to college here,

67
00:07:19,320 --> 00:07:24,320
 got into banking, I'm the market president for parenting banking trusts here in town.

68
00:07:24,320 --> 00:07:29,320
 I'm involved in several different chamber, and in the past I've been involved in city

69
00:07:29,320 --> 00:07:33,320
 committees as well. I'm currently on the economic development partnership board for the city

70
00:07:33,320 --> 00:07:38,320
 of Denden. I'm the chair for the downtown economic development committee. I've been

71
00:07:38,320 --> 00:07:44,320
 on the airport advisory board 10 plus years ago. I'm currently on the chair of the public

72
00:07:44,320 --> 00:07:46,320
 board.

73
00:07:46,320 --> 00:07:50,320
 Going down the line, that was fine thank you, but going down the line if we could just do

74
00:07:50,320 --> 00:07:54,320
 our names because we have already introduced ourselves. We're available online, so we're

75
00:07:54,320 --> 00:07:56,320
 just going to try and keep our names.

76
00:07:56,320 --> 00:08:01,320
 My name is David, I'm a pharmacist and I'm semi retired. Brian Danoff, lived in Denden

77
00:08:01,320 --> 00:08:06,320
 for about 14 years, live in district one, love Denden, so happy to serve on all sorts

78
00:08:06,320 --> 00:08:08,320
 of different stuff.

79
00:08:08,320 --> 00:08:12,320
 Nate Johnson, born and raised in Denden.

80
00:08:12,320 --> 00:08:20,320
 Gabriel Kirkpatrick or Gabe, welcome, been here in Denden since 2003.

81
00:08:20,320 --> 00:08:26,320
 My name is Christine, I'm also on zoning board adjustments and mobility.

82
00:08:26,320 --> 00:08:35,320
 Julie Ramsky, had been on the bond committee last summer in there, and I've been doing

83
00:08:35,320 --> 00:08:43,320
 since 2014 and I'm getting my feet wet slowly and slowly.

84
00:08:43,320 --> 00:08:50,320
 Jesse Davis, look at the DA's office for the day, formerly on the state council, the

85
00:08:50,320 --> 00:08:55,320
 board of ethics and currently on the bond committee currently represent Denden on the

86
00:08:55,320 --> 00:08:58,320
 Denden municipal power agency board.

87
00:08:58,320 --> 00:09:05,320
 Leslie Moore, I moved to Denden in 2016 and I currently serve as my son's PTA president

88
00:09:05,320 --> 00:09:08,320
 and they're happy here.

89
00:09:08,320 --> 00:09:16,320
 I'm Janie Siegel, I moved to Denden in 1978 for graduate school, been here ever since.

90
00:09:16,320 --> 00:09:22,320
 Hi, my name is Esperanza Marie, I was born and raised in Denden, I went to Denden high,

91
00:09:22,320 --> 00:09:28,320
 I went to UNT, I have three kids here, they go to Calhoun, were you at Calhoun, you look

92
00:09:28,320 --> 00:09:33,320
 familiar, yeah, I went to Calhoun, I was on the city bond committee so I remember a few

93
00:09:33,320 --> 00:09:37,320
 faces, and yeah, thank you.

94
00:09:37,320 --> 00:09:47,320
 All right, we will now move on to item B, number CRC24-012, consider approval of the

95
00:09:47,320 --> 00:09:53,320
 minutes of August 8th, 2024 charter review committee call.

96
00:09:53,320 --> 00:10:02,320
 Is there a motion to approve the minutes?

97
00:10:02,320 --> 00:10:11,320
 Commissioner Molina for, thank you.

98
00:10:11,320 --> 00:10:14,320
 Second from Commissioner Siegel.

99
00:10:14,320 --> 00:10:17,320
 All those in favor say aye.

100
00:10:17,320 --> 00:10:20,320
 All those opposed say nay.

101
00:10:20,320 --> 00:10:23,320
 All right, the ayes have it, the motion passes.

102
00:10:23,320 --> 00:10:30,320
 We will move on to item C, number CRC24-008, receive a report, hold a discussion and give

103
00:10:30,320 --> 00:10:35,320
 staff direction on modifying the mix of single and at large districts, this item was postponed

104
00:10:35,320 --> 00:10:40,320
 at our last meeting pending responses to outstanding committee questions, committee members received

105
00:10:40,320 --> 00:10:44,320
 responses to questions prior to the meeting, if the committee has any additional questions,

106
00:10:44,320 --> 00:10:49,320
 please use this time to let staff know, if not the floor is open for a brief discussion

107
00:10:49,320 --> 00:10:53,320
 and any motions the committee might wish to make.

108
00:10:53,320 --> 00:11:02,320
 I have a question, so we're talking about the districts at large and since we have to

109
00:11:02,320 --> 00:11:09,320
 do this again in 2030, by the time we go through all the civil rights boards and government

110
00:11:09,320 --> 00:11:14,320
 passing, you know, that it's good and going through the lawsuits that people don't like,

111
00:11:14,320 --> 00:11:22,320
 we're going to be back to 2030 again, so to me it's a big waste of public's money.

112
00:11:22,320 --> 00:11:28,320
 Thank you.

113
00:11:28,320 --> 00:11:32,320
 >> Go ahead.

114
00:11:32,320 --> 00:11:35,320
 >> First off, we're putting this together.

115
00:11:35,320 --> 00:11:42,320
 There's no absolute pattern which will assure everybody's got an equitable representation

116
00:11:42,320 --> 00:11:50,320
 by taking this off of stage 13 of the mock chart that is put together.

117
00:11:50,320 --> 00:11:55,320
 My recommendation is to maintain the mitts.

118
00:11:55,320 --> 00:11:58,320
 Just support that.

119
00:11:58,320 --> 00:12:02,320
 It's voiced many times within the model.

120
00:12:02,320 --> 00:12:08,320
 It allows for the districts to have a new member or two, depending on how many members

121
00:12:08,320 --> 00:12:11,320
 you have, to interact with.

122
00:12:11,320 --> 00:12:15,320
 There isn't no -- there is no need for --

123
00:12:15,320 --> 00:12:18,320
 >> Excuse me, can I ask you to speak a little louder, we've been having some issues on the

124
00:12:18,320 --> 00:12:22,320
 livestream because there's the overhead mic, so I would just ask the committee to speak

125
00:12:22,320 --> 00:12:23,320
 up.

126
00:12:23,320 --> 00:12:24,320
 >> Okay.

127
00:12:24,320 --> 00:12:25,320
 >> Apologies.

128
00:12:25,320 --> 00:12:28,320
 >> Where do you want me to start from?

129
00:12:28,320 --> 00:12:29,320
 >> I'm sorry.

130
00:12:29,320 --> 00:12:32,320
 I just want to make sure we're getting everything on the record.

131
00:12:32,320 --> 00:12:34,320
 If you wanted to start from the top, maybe.

132
00:12:34,320 --> 00:12:35,320
 >> Okay.

133
00:12:35,320 --> 00:12:36,320
 All righty.

134
00:12:36,320 --> 00:12:45,320
 From the 85-page sample make-up for council recommendations, I'm taking on page 13, the

135
00:12:45,320 --> 00:12:53,320
 fact that there's no absolute pattern which will assure that there is going to be an equitable

136
00:12:53,320 --> 00:12:56,320
 transportation and representation.

137
00:12:56,320 --> 00:13:03,320
 Equity -- and this is my comment, but it's also from page 81 of the same text, that the

138
00:13:03,320 --> 00:13:12,320
 definition of equity reflects the perception of those that are impacted by it or affected.

139
00:13:12,320 --> 00:13:16,320
 You are what you were when is a statement that I like to use.

140
00:13:16,320 --> 00:13:22,320
 If you're 12 years old, a daughter and your father passes away, you're going to have a

141
00:13:22,320 --> 00:13:28,320
 different perspective on life and everything that goes on after it than someone who loses

142
00:13:28,320 --> 00:13:34,320
 their father at the age of 30, 50, or 90.

143
00:13:34,320 --> 00:13:35,320
 Okay.

144
00:13:35,320 --> 00:13:42,320
 So I am recommending that we maintain the mix because one, that's what the model says

145
00:13:42,320 --> 00:13:43,320
 in many pages.

146
00:13:43,320 --> 00:13:49,320
 It allows for the districts to have another member or two, depending on how many at large

147
00:13:49,320 --> 00:13:52,320
 you are on the committee to interact with.

148
00:13:52,320 --> 00:14:01,320
 You don't have the issue of concern with everybody having an individual district that you're

149
00:14:01,320 --> 00:14:03,320
 going to have quid pro quo.

150
00:14:03,320 --> 00:14:10,320
 So I'm district two, and I want this, but district six wants this, and this is meeting

151
00:14:10,320 --> 00:14:17,320
 with everybody, is an individual district, and therefore looking at the problems as it

152
00:14:17,320 --> 00:14:21,320
 relates just to their district rather than the whole.

153
00:14:21,320 --> 00:14:28,320
 And then there wouldn't be quite the need to go for -- that they were going to be a

154
00:14:28,320 --> 00:14:33,320
 quid pro quo.

155
00:14:33,320 --> 00:14:38,320
 So there's a follow-up to the voter regulations, as mentioned by Mr. McClure, and so that's

156
00:14:38,320 --> 00:14:39,320
 for that.

157
00:14:39,320 --> 00:14:42,320
 And so, you know, so you don't have these pragmatic interests.

158
00:14:42,320 --> 00:14:45,320
 You don't worry about quid pro quo.

159
00:14:45,320 --> 00:14:52,320
 You've got a system that's already been in existence and has worked for several years.

160
00:14:52,320 --> 00:14:57,320
 The model says that's their best recommendation.

161
00:14:57,320 --> 00:15:01,320
 And that's basically my thought process.

162
00:15:01,320 --> 00:15:03,320
 Thank you.

163
00:15:03,320 --> 00:15:05,320
 >> Commissioner Kirkpatrick.

164
00:15:05,320 --> 00:15:08,320
 >> I heard both of my fellow -- what's the proper term we're using?

165
00:15:08,320 --> 00:15:09,320
 >> Commissioners.

166
00:15:09,320 --> 00:15:10,320
 >> Commissioner.

167
00:15:10,320 --> 00:15:11,320
 I like that.

168
00:15:11,320 --> 00:15:16,320
 Commissioners have said, my concern is always the idea that let's kick the can down the

169
00:15:16,320 --> 00:15:19,320
 street because we might come back to it six years later.

170
00:15:19,320 --> 00:15:23,320
 And I can understand that thought, but I think if we can get something right now for the

171
00:15:23,320 --> 00:15:24,320
 citizens, that's important.

172
00:15:24,320 --> 00:15:29,320
 For me, the way I see it is, I would like for us to expand and have smaller, to have

173
00:15:29,320 --> 00:15:33,320
 more council members because I think the way I kind of look at it is this.

174
00:15:33,320 --> 00:15:38,320
 You know, if whenever we're talking, let's say like this body right here, if you've got

175
00:15:38,320 --> 00:15:42,320
 two people who are representing everybody here, you can do the math on that.

176
00:15:42,320 --> 00:15:46,320
 If you've got four representing everybody here, you're getting in much smaller groups,

177
00:15:46,320 --> 00:15:52,320
 they're hearing the concerns much more, and they're able to, one, truly hear more of those

178
00:15:52,320 --> 00:15:56,320
 concerns and really get a sample of, okay, this is my community, this is what they're

179
00:15:56,320 --> 00:15:57,320
 saying.

180
00:15:57,320 --> 00:15:59,320
 It becomes easier and more efficient to do so.

181
00:15:59,320 --> 00:16:04,320
 I think also one thing that we don't talk about enough is when we do this and we have

182
00:16:04,320 --> 00:16:09,320
 these smaller districts, it makes it much more cost-effective and accessible to all

183
00:16:09,320 --> 00:16:12,320
 of our citizens, all of our residents, excuse me, to be specific.

184
00:16:12,320 --> 00:16:18,320
 I think that I've seen just at the local level how expensive these elections are becoming,

185
00:16:18,320 --> 00:16:19,320
 more and more.

186
00:16:19,320 --> 00:16:22,320
 More and more money is being involved, where I see, you know, a good example of our last

187
00:16:22,320 --> 00:16:27,320
 city council election where you looked at two candidates right next to each other, one

188
00:16:27,320 --> 00:16:31,320
 that was able to raise upwards of $25,000 over a whole cycle.

189
00:16:31,320 --> 00:16:32,320
 That's a lot of money.

190
00:16:32,320 --> 00:16:37,320
 Another who was able to gift themselves $25,000 numerous times.

191
00:16:37,320 --> 00:16:42,320
 It's very telling about, you know, the problems of money being too involved and having these

192
00:16:42,320 --> 00:16:46,320
 bigger, at-large seats where you're trying to cover the entire community and you're trying

193
00:16:46,320 --> 00:16:47,320
 to reach out to everybody.

194
00:16:47,320 --> 00:16:52,320
 I mean, it's simple enough if I'm looking at, and we're two at-large now, so forgive

195
00:16:52,320 --> 00:16:57,320
 me if I get the numbers wrong, but we're roughly at 150,000 and I don't, you know, if we're

196
00:16:57,320 --> 00:16:58,320
 wrong on that.

197
00:16:58,320 --> 00:17:00,320
 So each at-large is covering 75,000 people.

198
00:17:00,320 --> 00:17:05,320
 That being said, if we have more single districts and we're cutting that number down, all of

199
00:17:05,320 --> 00:17:09,320
 a sudden those single districts, instead of representing, we're currently at 35,000 with

200
00:17:09,320 --> 00:17:13,320
 the four districts, if we had those seats and we're getting down to some of those numbers,

201
00:17:13,320 --> 00:17:18,320
 which many of the comparable cities have, you're having the ability to, okay, this person's

202
00:17:18,320 --> 00:17:20,320
 representing 20,000 people, 25,000.

203
00:17:20,320 --> 00:17:23,320
 That's still a large number of people, but it's much more concise.

204
00:17:23,320 --> 00:17:26,320
 They truly have a feeling of the community.

205
00:17:26,320 --> 00:17:30,320
 I find it too much, too, when I go to city council meetings and I have not been to enough,

206
00:17:30,320 --> 00:17:35,320
 so not to over-speak, but quite often I come out of these meetings with these plans and

207
00:17:35,320 --> 00:17:39,320
 people from the community still feel like their voices haven't been heard, consistently

208
00:17:39,320 --> 00:17:40,320
 seeing that.

209
00:17:40,320 --> 00:17:43,320
 And that's concerning to me, for any district.

210
00:17:43,320 --> 00:17:49,320
 I think just simply enough, when you're able to have more representation that's a little

211
00:17:49,320 --> 00:17:53,320
 bit smaller, a little bit more efficient, you're going to have a better opportunity

212
00:17:53,320 --> 00:17:55,320
 of knowing your constituents.

213
00:17:55,320 --> 00:18:00,320
 And I understand the idea of the quid pro quo, but in the process, anytime, and that's

214
00:18:00,320 --> 00:18:03,320
 what we're doing in here, right, not quid pro quo, but we're discussing things and we're

215
00:18:03,320 --> 00:18:05,320
 trying to find common ground.

216
00:18:05,320 --> 00:18:09,320
 So I don't think that if you get to more people having a better understanding of smaller districts

217
00:18:09,320 --> 00:18:15,320
 that that's going to create more quid pro quo than you have if you have, you know, at

218
00:18:15,320 --> 00:18:16,320
 large seats.

219
00:18:16,320 --> 00:18:20,320
 My main concerns, and I know I've taken up a lot of times, forgive me, are that the smaller,

220
00:18:20,320 --> 00:18:24,320
 more efficient is better, getting more money out of the political system.

221
00:18:24,320 --> 00:18:28,320
 So people, a lot of the people I talk to, I don't know about yourselves, just from my

222
00:18:28,320 --> 00:18:31,320
 experience, they don't have the time to be here tonight.

223
00:18:31,320 --> 00:18:32,320
 They're working.

224
00:18:32,320 --> 00:18:33,320
 You know, there's a lot of that going on.

225
00:18:33,320 --> 00:18:35,320
 There's a lot of people working two or three jobs.

226
00:18:35,320 --> 00:18:39,320
 So when I have these conversations too, quite often it's the same thing like, look, you're

227
00:18:39,320 --> 00:18:40,320
 great.

228
00:18:40,320 --> 00:18:42,320
 Why don't you, man, I got a wife and two kids.

229
00:18:42,320 --> 00:18:46,320
 I got to work two jobs and I'm still not able to pay my bills.

230
00:18:46,320 --> 00:18:50,320
 So the more money that's in this process in the city council, the more we get a representation

231
00:18:50,320 --> 00:18:53,320
 of people who have the money and the ability to do so.

232
00:18:53,320 --> 00:18:58,320
 I think it naturally creates a chasm where we don't have people from all parts of our

233
00:18:58,320 --> 00:18:59,320
 residency.

234
00:18:59,320 --> 00:19:01,320
 So those are some of my basic thoughts on it.

235
00:19:01,320 --> 00:19:03,320
 Thank you for the time.

236
00:19:03,320 --> 00:19:05,320
 Thank you.

237
00:19:05,320 --> 00:19:06,320
 All right.

238
00:19:06,320 --> 00:19:09,320
 Thank you for that.

239
00:19:09,320 --> 00:19:16,320
 I kind of want to back up with what Weaver and Julie said a little bit.

240
00:19:16,320 --> 00:19:19,320
 We've got a city charter that meets the best practices.

241
00:19:19,320 --> 00:19:22,320
 We've got, it says in there, seven to nine people.

242
00:19:22,320 --> 00:19:24,320
 We've got seven.

243
00:19:24,320 --> 00:19:29,320
 We've got comparable local cities that are similar in size, that have similar representation

244
00:19:29,320 --> 00:19:31,320
 per district.

245
00:19:31,320 --> 00:19:39,320
 If we do redistricting, it's going to cost a bunch of legal fees, 40 to $120,000 of our

246
00:19:39,320 --> 00:19:41,320
 money.

247
00:19:41,320 --> 00:19:48,320
 We do have large growth, but we can also review the charter in another two years if that becomes

248
00:19:48,320 --> 00:19:49,320
 an issue.

249
00:19:49,320 --> 00:19:57,320
 Plus, we have a 2030 census that will basically tell us exactly what the growth is.

250
00:19:57,320 --> 00:20:01,320
 I think we're putting the cart before the horse a little bit.

251
00:20:01,320 --> 00:20:04,320
 We've got something that's worked for 44 years.

252
00:20:04,320 --> 00:20:10,320
 We've got an independent voice outside of this, of an independent organization saying

253
00:20:10,320 --> 00:20:13,320
 we are following the best practices.

254
00:20:13,320 --> 00:20:19,320
 The other side of that is if you get the council too big, people don't like to maybe hear this,

255
00:20:19,320 --> 00:20:23,320
 but a lot of the people who do the work for the city the most are the city employees.

256
00:20:23,320 --> 00:20:28,320
 You've got to support your city employees, and if they're getting pulled in more and

257
00:20:28,320 --> 00:20:33,320
 more directions from more and more and more council members at a city our size, that actually

258
00:20:33,320 --> 00:20:38,320
 makes our city less efficient because they have to answer to all these individual inquiries

259
00:20:38,320 --> 00:20:39,320
 and those things.

260
00:20:39,320 --> 00:20:43,320
 I think there's a lot of unintended consequences that happen.

261
00:20:43,320 --> 00:20:48,320
 I'm not saying that we don't get bigger as we grow, but I think for right now, we're

262
00:20:48,320 --> 00:20:54,320
 kind of in the sweet spot, and if we want to do that later, again, there's nothing to

263
00:20:54,320 --> 00:20:57,320
 preclude us from doing this again in two years.

264
00:20:57,320 --> 00:20:59,320
 We can see some of the growth.

265
00:20:59,320 --> 00:21:01,320
 We can do those things.

266
00:21:01,320 --> 00:21:05,320
 I think there is a good mix.

267
00:21:05,320 --> 00:21:10,320
 I really don't like the idea of having only single districts because I think that can

268
00:21:10,320 --> 00:21:15,320
 be very politically fraught with things that everyone complains about depending on who's

269
00:21:15,320 --> 00:21:18,320
 in power at the time like gerrymandering.

270
00:21:18,320 --> 00:21:21,320
 That can go back and forth, back and forth, back and forth.

271
00:21:21,320 --> 00:21:25,320
 That can cause a lot of problems long term.

272
00:21:25,320 --> 00:21:30,320
 I just want to say my voice is for now, I think we've got a very good mix.

273
00:21:30,320 --> 00:21:37,320
 I think it meets the best practices, and I very strongly think we should keep it how

274
00:21:37,320 --> 00:21:38,320
 it is.

275
00:21:38,320 --> 00:21:42,320
 I just want to clarify before further discussion, the item up for discussion right now is districts

276
00:21:42,320 --> 00:21:46,320
 versus at-large, not total number of districts.

277
00:21:46,320 --> 00:21:47,320
 Mr. Johnson?

278
00:21:47,320 --> 00:21:55,320
 I think that it should be six districts, and if you go by the North Texas Council of Government,

279
00:21:55,320 --> 00:22:04,320
 it estimates that the population would be 215,835 in 2035.

280
00:22:04,320 --> 00:22:10,320
 That's 11 to almost what, 10 to almost 11 years from now.

281
00:22:10,320 --> 00:22:15,320
 So we're here, we think we have to think forward for the future of the city.

282
00:22:15,320 --> 00:22:28,320
 And then it said it's going to be 298,019 in 2050, which leaves four districts to have

283
00:22:28,320 --> 00:22:36,320
 53,958.75, my number's correct.

284
00:22:36,320 --> 00:22:38,320
 The population.

285
00:22:38,320 --> 00:22:43,320
 Now, is the population supposed to be the same around the city?

286
00:22:43,320 --> 00:22:52,320
 Because in the next 10 to 20 years, out in the Robeson Ranch area, that side of town,

287
00:22:52,320 --> 00:22:59,320
 they should be getting approximately probably about 25,000, maybe 30,000 new homes built

288
00:22:59,320 --> 00:23:01,320
 in the next 20 years.

289
00:23:01,320 --> 00:23:10,320
 So that needs to be, the district needs to be broken up all around and redrawn.

290
00:23:10,320 --> 00:23:21,320
 Now, if you do six districts, you have 35,975 in each district 2035.

291
00:23:21,320 --> 00:23:29,320
 You have 49,669.8 in each district in 2050.

292
00:23:29,320 --> 00:23:41,320
 And if you modify to eight with one at large, then you're going to have 26,979.3 in 2035,

293
00:23:41,320 --> 00:23:54,320
 37,252.3 in 2050, which are smaller numbers for council members to deal with as you have,

294
00:23:54,320 --> 00:23:57,320
 once you take away the enlarged seat.

295
00:23:57,320 --> 00:24:02,320
 So you're not taking away the number of people on council.

296
00:24:02,320 --> 00:24:07,320
 You're just getting rid of the enlarged seats, in which you don't have to raise a lot of

297
00:24:07,320 --> 00:24:10,320
 money when you are just doing a single district.

298
00:24:10,320 --> 00:24:14,320
 So you don't have to hear people complain about developer money coming in because you

299
00:24:14,320 --> 00:24:20,320
 don't need that much money when you're just focusing on your particular district.

300
00:24:20,320 --> 00:24:27,320
 So I think modifying the council, and that's the way I would go.

301
00:24:27,320 --> 00:24:29,320
 Hi, Commissioner Davis.

302
00:24:29,320 --> 00:24:35,320
 I have to back us up a little bit, y'all, because nothing that we do on this committee,

303
00:24:35,320 --> 00:24:39,320
 even if every one of our recommendations goes forward to city council, and they agree

304
00:24:39,320 --> 00:24:43,320
 and they put it on the ballot, and the citizens agree and they vote it into the charter,

305
00:24:43,320 --> 00:24:49,320
 nothing that we do is going to constrain or change the political process.

306
00:24:49,320 --> 00:24:53,320
 It just spends money on what candidates, how they raise their money, whether they raise

307
00:24:53,320 --> 00:24:56,320
 money at home or somewhere else.

308
00:24:56,320 --> 00:25:03,320
 I take great issue, Mr. Kirkpatrick, with you specifically singling out a particular

309
00:25:03,320 --> 00:25:09,320
 race from the last cycle, because what that does is shows us that we're talking about

310
00:25:09,320 --> 00:25:13,320
 the last couple of political cycles, and that is not our job.

311
00:25:13,320 --> 00:25:18,320
 Our job is to set the parameters, well, to recommend the parameters for the governing

312
00:25:18,320 --> 00:25:20,320
 document of the city.

313
00:25:20,320 --> 00:25:25,320
 From there, whether we change it or not, that's the law of the land that the city council

314
00:25:25,320 --> 00:25:27,320
 then uses to draw the district lines.

315
00:25:27,320 --> 00:25:31,320
 We're not deciding how many people live in District 4 or District 3 or District 2 or

316
00:25:31,320 --> 00:25:32,320
 District 1.

317
00:25:32,320 --> 00:25:35,320
 We're not deciding who gets to run for which places.

318
00:25:35,320 --> 00:25:40,320
 We're going to have a conversation later about some things that touch on that.

319
00:25:40,320 --> 00:25:43,320
 But we're not setting that out.

320
00:25:43,320 --> 00:25:48,320
 We're setting the ground rules, and the ground rules we have right now, our best practices

321
00:25:48,320 --> 00:25:53,320
 according to the National League of Cities, are comparable with our peer cities, whether

322
00:25:53,320 --> 00:25:57,320
 you're saying peer cities because they're around us or you're saying peer cities because

323
00:25:57,320 --> 00:26:03,320
 they're the same size as us or the same kind of mix of people as us.

324
00:26:03,320 --> 00:26:07,320
 The exception to the rule is either all at large or all single member.

325
00:26:07,320 --> 00:26:14,320
 The general rule that works very well is to have about seven, that is a mix, of single

326
00:26:14,320 --> 00:26:16,320
 member district and at large.

327
00:26:16,320 --> 00:26:18,320
 That works very well.

328
00:26:18,320 --> 00:26:19,320
 Why does it work well?

329
00:26:19,320 --> 00:26:21,320
 Because I get four votes on the city council.

330
00:26:21,320 --> 00:26:27,320
 When I speak about my pothole or where I want the sewer plant to be or whatever, at least

331
00:26:27,320 --> 00:26:30,320
 four people need to listen to me as a constituent.

332
00:26:30,320 --> 00:26:35,320
 If I have just my person and just the mayor, then the rest of them, they're going to have

333
00:26:35,320 --> 00:26:37,320
 to never take my calls.

334
00:26:37,320 --> 00:26:38,320
 They don't have to answer my emails.

335
00:26:38,320 --> 00:26:42,320
 They don't have to pay attention when I come to the dais and talk, or come to the podium

336
00:26:42,320 --> 00:26:43,320
 and talk rather.

337
00:26:43,320 --> 00:26:45,320
 They don't have to give a roof about me.

338
00:26:45,320 --> 00:26:47,320
 They're never going to knock on my door.

339
00:26:47,320 --> 00:26:52,320
 They're never going to want to know what I want to say or my perspective on city things

340
00:26:52,320 --> 00:26:53,320
 because they don't have to.

341
00:26:53,320 --> 00:26:56,320
 They have no accountability with me as a citizen.

342
00:26:56,320 --> 00:26:58,320
 And you split it out.

343
00:26:58,320 --> 00:27:03,320
 You make it to where the city council acts more like Congress and less like a board of

344
00:27:03,320 --> 00:27:04,320
 directors.

345
00:27:04,320 --> 00:27:09,320
 Why does the board of directors work well for something like a multi-billion dollar

346
00:27:09,320 --> 00:27:11,320
 company, like the city of Denton has?

347
00:27:11,320 --> 00:27:12,320
 Why does the board of directors?

348
00:27:12,320 --> 00:27:17,320
 Because it's close to people and it's close to the problem because it's an effective group,

349
00:27:17,320 --> 00:27:19,320
 effective size of people.

350
00:27:19,320 --> 00:27:21,320
 It's an effective dynamic.

351
00:27:21,320 --> 00:27:26,320
 When you get up to some of these cities, we live close to at least one big city that has

352
00:27:26,320 --> 00:27:29,320
 added so many people to their city council.

353
00:27:29,320 --> 00:27:34,320
 Like, look at Houston, that city council is not a group that gets together and gets stuff

354
00:27:34,320 --> 00:27:35,320
 done.

355
00:27:35,320 --> 00:27:39,320
 That's a group of people that's constantly shifting political alliances.

356
00:27:39,320 --> 00:27:43,320
 That's factions and partisanized.

357
00:27:43,320 --> 00:27:46,320
 That's not an effective way to get things done.

358
00:27:46,320 --> 00:27:52,320
 You look at a big city like New York, all these multiple districts, are they able to

359
00:27:52,320 --> 00:27:55,320
 effectively do things like we do in the city of Denton?

360
00:27:55,320 --> 00:27:56,320
 No, they're not.

361
00:27:56,320 --> 00:28:01,320
 I want to also push back just a little bit on some of the statistics, and again, this

362
00:28:01,320 --> 00:28:07,320
 narrative that we've heard about one particular part of town, not to correct me, but I think

363
00:28:07,320 --> 00:28:15,320
 the number is about 2,500 to 3,000 homes and about 30,000 total people by that date.

364
00:28:15,320 --> 00:28:21,320
 It's the number of homes, residential units, is around 3,000.

365
00:28:21,320 --> 00:28:26,320
 In the year 20 ... Excuse me, scrolled down too far.

366
00:28:26,320 --> 00:28:32,320
 In the year 2022, across the city of Denton, not a single home was built in the Hunter

367
00:28:32,320 --> 00:28:38,320
 Cole Ranch area, and 4,000 were built in the rest of the city.

368
00:28:38,320 --> 00:28:44,320
 To date, we've issued 1,200 permits just in the first half of 2024, and not a single house

369
00:28:44,320 --> 00:28:49,320
 permit or apartment permit, not a single housing unit has been built in this area that we're

370
00:28:49,320 --> 00:28:50,320
 talking about.

371
00:28:50,320 --> 00:28:56,320
 If you look at the population density map, District 2 is going to grow at the same rate

372
00:28:56,320 --> 00:28:58,320
 as what we call Mount's current District 4.

373
00:28:58,320 --> 00:29:00,320
 Why do I bring that up?

374
00:29:00,320 --> 00:29:03,320
 All that's to say, that's not our job today.

375
00:29:03,320 --> 00:29:05,320
 We're not drawing these lines.

376
00:29:05,320 --> 00:29:07,320
 We're not saying where these districts are.

377
00:29:07,320 --> 00:29:10,320
 We're just talking about, should we have some that large, and eventually we're going to

378
00:29:10,320 --> 00:29:14,320
 talk about how many districts should there be altogether.

379
00:29:14,320 --> 00:29:22,320
 The last thing I'm going to say at this point is this, there's a philosophical or a thought

380
00:29:22,320 --> 00:29:25,320
 problem that's called Chesterton's Fence.

381
00:29:25,320 --> 00:29:27,320
 You've probably heard of it.

382
00:29:27,320 --> 00:29:30,320
 It's the idea that, and it works well in Texas too, even though Chesterton was from England,

383
00:29:30,320 --> 00:29:36,320
 when you come across a closed gate, when you come across a fence, the first thing you do

384
00:29:36,320 --> 00:29:41,320
 isn't kick down the fence or open the gate, and then let whatever's in there out.

385
00:29:41,320 --> 00:29:46,320
 The first thing you do is stop and figure out why is this gate here in the first place

386
00:29:46,320 --> 00:29:49,320
 before you start changing the status quo.

387
00:29:49,320 --> 00:29:54,320
 We've talked about the many reasons why this status quo is here, why it serves the citizens

388
00:29:54,320 --> 00:30:00,320
 well, and the only reason we've heard to change it are based on incorrect data,

389
00:30:00,320 --> 00:30:06,320
 unfortunately a politically driven narrative that doesn't match the data.

390
00:30:06,320 --> 00:30:13,320
 The closest thing to a cogent argument we've heard is this tighter representation idea.

391
00:30:13,320 --> 00:30:17,320
 Some of us are from Denton, have been here a long time, some of us aren't.

392
00:30:17,320 --> 00:30:24,320
 Some of us were here during, I don't know how many rounds of protests and wet/dry elections

393
00:30:24,320 --> 00:30:28,320
 and all sorts of different things going on across town.

394
00:30:28,320 --> 00:30:34,320
 This has never been a town that has an issue with people making themselves heard.

395
00:30:34,320 --> 00:30:36,320
 It's never really been our problem.

396
00:30:36,320 --> 00:30:37,320
 Maybe that's a problem somewhere else.

397
00:30:37,320 --> 00:30:40,320
 That's never been our particular problem.

398
00:30:40,320 --> 00:30:46,320
 The idea that if a council member has a little bit smaller area, that there's somehow

399
00:30:46,320 --> 00:30:53,320
 going to be a better council member, as opposed to just one more player on the board,

400
00:30:53,320 --> 00:30:58,320
 as opposed to someone who can actually effectively represent the whole city.

401
00:30:58,320 --> 00:31:02,320
 That's something else we also heard last time, our council members say it all the time,

402
00:31:02,320 --> 00:31:08,320
 that they represent the whole city even though they're elected from their district or their neighborhood.

403
00:31:08,320 --> 00:31:13,320
 How is that possibly going to be the case if there are six single-member district people?

404
00:31:13,320 --> 00:31:15,320
 Why would they bother to represent the whole city?

405
00:31:15,320 --> 00:31:19,320
 Why would they go out of their way to represent what somebody across town needs

406
00:31:19,320 --> 00:31:23,320
 when they're just a baby legislature and the only people they really need in their corner

407
00:31:23,320 --> 00:31:25,320
 are the ones right around them in their neighborhood?

408
00:31:25,320 --> 00:31:29,320
 But they still have to vote.

409
00:31:29,320 --> 00:31:36,320
 So at this time, I move that we recommend to council no change on this part of the charter,

410
00:31:36,320 --> 00:31:39,320
 on the mix of single and at-large districts.

411
00:31:39,320 --> 00:31:40,320
 All right.

412
00:31:40,320 --> 00:31:42,320
 Do I hear a second for that motion?

413
00:31:42,320 --> 00:31:44,320
 Seconded by Commissioner Moeller.

414
00:31:44,320 --> 00:31:47,320
 So we will now have a discussion on that motion.

415
00:31:47,320 --> 00:31:54,320
 I'll just add at the beginning that the conversation thus far has ranged around sort of seven versus nine

416
00:31:54,320 --> 00:31:59,320
 and mixed versus primarily at district seats.

417
00:31:59,320 --> 00:32:06,320
 And on both of those issues, both of the options are contained within the best practices recommendations

418
00:32:06,320 --> 00:32:07,320
 for the League of Municipal Cities.

419
00:32:07,320 --> 00:32:12,320
 I don't think anyone here is recommending anything that falls outside of something that is described

420
00:32:12,320 --> 00:32:16,320
 as best practices by the League of Municipal Cities.

421
00:32:16,320 --> 00:32:19,320
 Commissioner Johnson, I saw your hand first.

422
00:32:19,320 --> 00:32:25,320
 I understand what Commissioner Davis is saying, but the statistics that I quoted

423
00:32:25,320 --> 00:32:32,320
 came from the North Texas Council of Government Estimates of the Population of Denton in 2035.

424
00:32:32,320 --> 00:32:34,320
 Those weren't the numbers that I came up with.

425
00:32:34,320 --> 00:32:35,320
 Those were right. Those were actually right.

426
00:32:35,320 --> 00:32:37,320
 That's the population.

427
00:32:37,320 --> 00:32:47,320
 So in order to get anything done on city council, every councilman member has to vote.

428
00:32:47,320 --> 00:32:55,320
 So it would be to the council members representing that district's best interest to either invite

429
00:32:55,320 --> 00:33:00,320
 another council member to hear what his constituents have to say because they've done it in district one before.

430
00:33:00,320 --> 00:33:08,320
 I mean, you shouldn't just have to be just bogged down in your district.

431
00:33:08,320 --> 00:33:19,320
 When I've seen district two, district three, enter at large, come to a D1 meeting and sit in and listen.

432
00:33:19,320 --> 00:33:29,320
 So just to say that nobody would, they have no reason to listen to you or whatever that was.

433
00:33:29,320 --> 00:33:33,320
 Council still has to vote together to get things done and move.

434
00:33:33,320 --> 00:33:39,320
 So it's, I yield.

435
00:33:39,320 --> 00:33:40,320
 Commissioner Kirkpatrick.

436
00:33:40,320 --> 00:33:45,320
 Quickly, and if I may staff, I have a couple of questions because I've heard these concerns on that too.

437
00:33:45,320 --> 00:33:52,320
 So the cost, if we have any change, you know, understanding what cost that would be, understanding that.

438
00:33:52,320 --> 00:33:59,320
 Also, correct me if I'm wrong, but the peer cities that we have, and I believe from two sessions ago,

439
00:33:59,320 --> 00:34:04,320
 it was noted that McAllen and Mesquite were both the most recent to make changes. Is that correct? Am I correct on that?

440
00:34:04,320 --> 00:34:05,320
 Correct, I believe so.

441
00:34:05,320 --> 00:34:10,320
 Okay. And so what they have done is they've gone to six single districts with a mayor at large.

442
00:34:10,320 --> 00:34:14,320
 And what they've done is narrow their numbers to what we would be if we did the same.

443
00:34:14,320 --> 00:34:17,320
 We're at 35,000 each for four districts.

444
00:34:17,320 --> 00:34:23,320
 They are currently at six, excuse me, six each with a similar population within four to five thousand.

445
00:34:23,320 --> 00:34:29,320
 So we'd be much more. So that recent change has been that.

446
00:34:29,320 --> 00:34:30,320
 That's all I have for the city.

447
00:34:30,320 --> 00:34:36,320
 What I did want to respond to is I've heard a couple of times, and forgive me, I can't move off from who said it's been working for four years.

448
00:34:36,320 --> 00:34:40,320
 I'm not sure it's been working for anybody for four years. I think that's a statement to be made.

449
00:34:40,320 --> 00:34:45,320
 But who is it working for? So I asked that question of the entire body.

450
00:34:45,320 --> 00:34:52,320
 My next one is, you know, it's interesting, Commissioner Davis, you both in the first session and tonight bring up politics.

451
00:34:52,320 --> 00:34:59,320
 And bringing up representation and, you know, who does a representative have to be careful to?

452
00:34:59,320 --> 00:35:03,320
 And I can see you being sensitive to that, because correct me if I'm wrong.

453
00:35:03,320 --> 00:35:09,320
 But when your last election, when you ran as a city councilman, not only did you lose that election,

454
00:35:09,320 --> 00:35:13,320
 but the recall for you had more votes against you than you had for you.

455
00:35:13,320 --> 00:35:19,320
 I.E. the people in your community did not want to have you on council.

456
00:35:19,320 --> 00:35:23,320
 Let's not wander. Look, and I'm just saying so I can understand the sensitive. I'm not trying to be.

457
00:35:23,320 --> 00:35:27,320
 Point of order. Sure.

458
00:35:27,320 --> 00:35:37,320
 That really brings up something that should not be used as a rationalization.

459
00:35:37,320 --> 00:35:44,320
 Have you ever been on a jury? If I may finish, may I?

460
00:35:44,320 --> 00:35:54,320
 And I'm just bringing up the point that because he literally he specifically brought up the point about the idea that if we go to single districts and people in those districts, we're not going to have to be as communicative.

461
00:35:54,320 --> 00:36:01,320
 They're not going to worry about everybody else. So and I find it interesting, too, that you've twice brought up the political thing, but it's been you bringing that up.

462
00:36:01,320 --> 00:36:08,320
 It's been you twice that's done that. So I think that that's that's gaslighting 101. So I'll yield the floor to that.

463
00:36:08,320 --> 00:36:16,320
 May I speak to my motion? All right, let's run this down. First, Mesquite McAllen.

464
00:36:16,320 --> 00:36:26,320
 Those were not grassroots efforts. Those changes were calculated political operations to change the makeup of those city councils.

465
00:36:26,320 --> 00:36:37,320
 It's well documented. It's out there in the media. Those were not groundswells of the people talking about how I can't get hold of my at large member or we've got to have a single member district.

466
00:36:37,320 --> 00:36:42,320
 So we only have twenty five thousand people per member. That's just not accurate.

467
00:36:42,320 --> 00:36:51,320
 That's not the case. I didn't bring up politics last time. The way politics came up is gaslighting.

468
00:36:51,320 --> 00:37:06,320
 Okay, gaslighting is when you say everything except the word politics and then freak out when somebody says the word politics gaslighting is when you talk about incessantly about the cost of campaigns.

469
00:37:06,320 --> 00:37:09,320
 And then when someone says the word politics, they're the ones bringing it up.

470
00:37:09,320 --> 00:37:19,320
 Gaslighting is when the guy that's at the Democratic National Convention right now says, can we get that data at the precinct level?

471
00:37:19,320 --> 00:37:30,320
 Because it's not about setting up the playing field to be even. That's not what you're talking about. You're talking about a particular political goal.

472
00:37:30,320 --> 00:37:37,320
 We are not here to do politics that preserve a majority for one group or hurt the majority of another group.

473
00:37:37,320 --> 00:37:43,320
 We're not here to make sure that folks in the ropes and ranch area get to vote better or don't. We're not going to do any of that.

474
00:37:43,320 --> 00:37:53,320
 We're here to say what is the best model for a city and then later on the elected leaders of our city will decide what these districts look like.

475
00:37:53,320 --> 00:38:04,320
 Okay. And I'm not going to go around the room. I don't think it's fair to go around the room and call every single person out for their involvement with partisan politics.

476
00:38:04,320 --> 00:38:08,320
 I'm involved in partisan politics. I wear that on my sleeve. Everybody's known it forever.

477
00:38:08,320 --> 00:38:12,320
 Gabe, you're a professional door knocker and a campaign manager. That's inaccurate.

478
00:38:12,320 --> 00:38:16,320
 Does staff have concerns about the conversation at this moment or?

479
00:38:16,320 --> 00:38:23,320
 I do think we just need to keep it respectful and not personally target any members of the committee.

480
00:38:23,320 --> 00:38:28,320
 That's all I'll say. And I will just say that we are on a time crunch. So if we can.

481
00:38:28,320 --> 00:38:34,320
 I would like I would like to wrap up. I would like to wrap up.

482
00:38:34,320 --> 00:38:40,320
 I was very, very personally called out. I have an absolute right to respond to that.

483
00:38:40,320 --> 00:38:48,320
 And we are not stuck to however many meetings and however many hours we can stay as long or as short a time as the committee wants to.

484
00:38:48,320 --> 00:39:00,320
 We can take as many meetings or as many means we don't want to answer these questions or to tell the city council that its committee that appointed can't decide on a way forward and they ought to leave things the way that they are.

485
00:39:00,320 --> 00:39:16,320
 Go back and watch the city council meetings where we were each appointed. Go and talk to your city council members, anybody who's watching this at home, Google some of the folks on the committee and tell me that I'm gaslighting when I call this out as a political operation in the city.

486
00:39:16,320 --> 00:39:33,320
 I would ask that any follow up, the germane to the topic of districts large. I do want, as Jesse has said, we are not necessarily bound by a timeline, but still both who agreed to be part of this committee.

487
00:39:33,320 --> 00:39:40,320
 I assume had some assumption that they were agreeing to eight one and a half hour meetings. If we run over that a bit.

488
00:39:40,320 --> 00:39:46,320
 Yeah, we run over that excess believe that something.

489
00:39:46,320 --> 00:39:58,320
 Did the city ever find out what the cost of adding new members and getting it through the government regulations that we have to get it through for both at large and single districts.

490
00:39:58,320 --> 00:40:01,320
 Yes, or at least to some degree.

491
00:40:01,320 --> 00:40:18,320
 What we do have is information from when we did the twenty, twenty one redistricting cycle and we the city budgeted roughly a hundred thousand dollars for outside council to consult and do all of that work for us.

492
00:40:18,320 --> 00:40:35,320
 The city ended up only spending thirty one thousand dollars of that roughly, but that was because the council elected to bypass some of the processes that were not budgeted so we ended up under budget but that's that was twenty, twenty one redistricting.

493
00:40:35,320 --> 00:40:45,320
 We budgeted a hundred thousand dollars. Okay, what did it cost for the city employees to the whole process. I mean, there was a big cost of the city on that.

494
00:40:45,320 --> 00:40:56,320
 That information. I don't have. I could try to track down some numbers on it, but it certainly does cost staff time and money, so it should be a lot of money.

495
00:40:56,320 --> 00:41:00,320
 I would guess.

496
00:41:00,320 --> 00:41:01,320
 All right.

497
00:41:01,320 --> 00:41:19,320
 So I did listen to me last week. So a couple points. I still struggle with if I have four people that represent me, how going to one person is an advantage when I have four people that I can talk to now.

498
00:41:19,320 --> 00:41:24,320
 I just struggle with that obviously at large gives me that advantage.

499
00:41:24,320 --> 00:41:42,320
 I see I hear what different people are saying about the number of council members that we have, whether they're at large or by district, but at the end of the day, you have seven represent seven representatives or, you know, one representative or four.

500
00:41:42,320 --> 00:41:55,320
 Look at it. There's seven people representing the entire city. However, you do the math, you can either do the whole population divided by the number of districts and then program program.

501
00:41:55,320 --> 00:42:09,320
 The you know, the mayor and the other two, you get the same number. You got seven people supporting the entire city, except in one scenario, you have one person that represents you and the other scenario, you have four.

502
00:42:09,320 --> 00:42:16,320
 So I don't know how less representation is more favorable for any individual.

503
00:42:16,320 --> 00:42:45,320
 First off, secondly, I think it by having individual districts, it creates a divide. Whereas now, there should be more community because you have more people focused on the entire city. And, and Mr. Johnson, one of the comments you made on the video last month, which at least I thought I interpreted is there was a meeting in district one, I believe, where there was an at large and a district.

504
00:42:45,320 --> 00:42:58,320
 Your district council member, and there was a difference of the message that was sent back, but you were glad that the right message was contained in the message that went.

505
00:42:58,320 --> 00:43:27,320
 So I think the current structure seems to benefit that. And in my profession, I'm probably going to know most all council members, so it doesn't have as much of an impact on me. But if I was an individual citizen, which I am a citizen, but if I didn't have the position that I have, I would probably want to have the opportunity to have a relationship with more people.

506
00:43:27,320 --> 00:43:32,320
 Then less.

507
00:43:32,320 --> 00:43:37,320
 Is there anything in the chart of the states that.

508
00:43:37,320 --> 00:43:48,320
 Nope, no other council member can sit in on another district's meeting. Is that a question for staff for staff? No, there's not.

509
00:43:48,320 --> 00:44:17,320
 All right. Was that all. Yes. Okay. Commissioner runs key. A couple of things I was trying to find and I do not have my page cited, but there is a statement that you can't ensure how well of a representative you're going to have, whether you have them as an at large or as a district.

510
00:44:17,320 --> 00:44:34,320
 So therefore your statement about can one sit in on another district, you may have somebody from an individual district who does attend, you know, district two goes to district for this meeting.

511
00:44:34,320 --> 00:44:38,320
 District three goes to district one.

512
00:44:38,320 --> 00:44:47,320
 Or and or the at large, you may have at largest show up at all of the be any of them at all of the meetings and vice versa.

513
00:44:47,320 --> 00:44:50,320
 One of the things is.

514
00:44:50,320 --> 00:44:56,320
 Chair Christine has mentioned is we're not supposed to really be looking at numbers.

515
00:44:56,320 --> 00:45:02,320
 But one can't help taking the numbers of the population out of this issue.

516
00:45:02,320 --> 00:45:08,320
 But the first thing is looking at the mix.

517
00:45:08,320 --> 00:45:11,320
 If we keep a mix.

518
00:45:11,320 --> 00:45:15,320
 And we then discuss the numbers.

519
00:45:15,320 --> 00:45:32,320
 We've got a potential to look at it once we have the numbers and say, okay, I want to up the numbers to 37, which we have 12 districts and the rest of them at large.

520
00:45:32,320 --> 00:45:40,320
 So that is kind of in an estimation as to a way to do it.

521
00:45:40,320 --> 00:45:49,320
 And I think perhaps if I may, I don't know if we finished the motion and took about.

522
00:45:49,320 --> 00:45:53,320
 So let's perhaps go back to that.

523
00:45:53,320 --> 00:45:56,320
 See how the vote comes out.

524
00:45:56,320 --> 00:46:01,320
 If we can't reach a consensus and have a good vote on it.

525
00:46:01,320 --> 00:46:06,320
 Then we move it to the next thing or we perhaps have another motion.

526
00:46:06,320 --> 00:46:10,320
 That would be a good approach.

527
00:46:10,320 --> 00:46:12,320
 If we have a motion on the floor, we vote for it.

528
00:46:12,320 --> 00:46:14,320
 If that doesn't, then there's no emotion.

529
00:46:14,320 --> 00:46:18,320
 If it doesn't pass, then it's supposed to be bad, right?

530
00:46:18,320 --> 00:46:24,320
 For this meeting, there can also at later meetings be a motion to have it brought back up.

531
00:46:24,320 --> 00:46:32,320
 So it's not necessarily doesn't totally end the discussion if there's consensus to bring it back later.

532
00:46:32,320 --> 00:46:36,320
 Please let staff finish their comments, Mr. Dan.

533
00:46:36,320 --> 00:46:40,320
 Can we I agree we should we should vote on the motion.

534
00:46:40,320 --> 00:46:43,320
 Commissioner Davis, can you just restate the motion?

535
00:46:43,320 --> 00:46:46,320
 Because we talked about that a lot.

536
00:46:46,320 --> 00:46:49,320
 I just want to make sure everyone understands what they're both not.

537
00:46:49,320 --> 00:46:51,320
 I mean, I mean, I get it word for word.

538
00:46:51,320 --> 00:47:01,320
 But it was that motion that we recommend to hear some start to talk to maybe they had written it down motion that we recommend to the city council not to modify the current mix.

539
00:47:01,320 --> 00:47:05,320
 The current mix of single and at large, single member and at large districts.

540
00:47:05,320 --> 00:47:07,320
 So I ask a question.

541
00:47:07,320 --> 00:47:17,320
 So we're just voting on if we need if we're going to have single and at large districts, no numbers, no nothing.

542
00:47:17,320 --> 00:47:19,320
 That's just the same.

543
00:47:19,320 --> 00:47:23,320
 He's making a motion that will maintain a mix.

544
00:47:23,320 --> 00:47:34,320
 The committee recommends things to council council, I believe, will get final say on those particular items.

545
00:47:34,320 --> 00:47:37,320
 But I would take it.

546
00:47:37,320 --> 00:47:41,320
 Not modifying would mean not changing from four to three.

547
00:47:41,320 --> 00:47:54,320
 Would not that would preclude like a five, two or three, four or so on. I believe that would mean keeping it as four, three legal motion.

548
00:47:54,320 --> 00:48:01,320
 The motion is to keep them to not modify that would preclude.

549
00:48:01,320 --> 00:48:07,320
 Yeah. So then your vote is in favor of not modifying or not.

550
00:48:07,320 --> 00:48:11,320
 All right. I'll just add my thoughts here.

551
00:48:11,320 --> 00:48:29,320
 I suppose to refer back to the model charter, the model charter specifically says that having entirely at large districts can result in communities where there is not a homogenous population.

552
00:48:29,320 --> 00:48:34,320
 Minority voices will be excluded from that because they may not get any seats.

553
00:48:34,320 --> 00:48:45,320
 That means to me that seven at large and zero districts results in suppression of minority voice.

554
00:48:45,320 --> 00:48:52,320
 The further that you kind of move along the scale in the opposite way, the more minority voice that you get.

555
00:48:52,320 --> 00:48:56,320
 I think that's important because voting is not just an individual activity.

556
00:48:56,320 --> 00:49:00,320
 Voting is your community having a voice.

557
00:49:00,320 --> 00:49:06,320
 And so it's not just that I, Christine Bray have a certain voice when votes are conducted in a certain way.

558
00:49:06,320 --> 00:49:17,320
 It is that the community of people who are like Christine or the community of people who are like Patrick or like Julia or like Nate Johnson, that community of people.

559
00:49:17,320 --> 00:49:20,320
 And we know that different communities vote at different rates.

560
00:49:20,320 --> 00:49:31,320
 That's why the Voting Rights Act recommends district seats as a remedy for that because you can have populations that get overruled and entirely at large.

561
00:49:31,320 --> 00:49:40,320
 So Commissioner Davis, I think your point is well taken that we should not necessarily be discussing specific elections, specific events within the city.

562
00:49:40,320 --> 00:49:45,320
 So I want to bring in some data from national evaluations.

563
00:49:45,320 --> 00:49:53,320
 There was a team that looked at 7,000 cities or municipalities across the country, not just cities, but also school boards.

564
00:49:53,320 --> 00:50:03,320
 And they determined that districts aid racial and ethnic minorities because more traditionally underrepresented candidates choose to run district races.

565
00:50:03,320 --> 00:50:11,320
 If the organizing, fundraising, and campaign costs are substantially different between districts and citywide races, this may well be a factor.

566
00:50:11,320 --> 00:50:18,320
 Other research shows that district seats increase representation for racial minorities.

567
00:50:18,320 --> 00:50:24,320
 So that's that's kind of my thought on this is that it is not just about individuals.

568
00:50:24,320 --> 00:50:28,320
 It is about communities and how we can adhere to community representation.

569
00:50:28,320 --> 00:50:32,320
 I don't make that you said the further you get away from all at large, the better.

570
00:50:32,320 --> 00:50:34,320
 That would be that's your opinion.

571
00:50:34,320 --> 00:50:43,320
 That would not be the same as saying if it's 10,000 degrees, I'm right next to the sun. The further I get away from 10,000 degrees, the better chance have a living.

572
00:50:43,320 --> 00:50:47,320
 But if I'm negative 10,000 degrees and I'm dead to sure.

573
00:50:47,320 --> 00:51:02,320
 So in response to that, some data on the relationship between the type of representation and I'm quoting this is cited in the effective at large versus district elections on racial representation elections.

574
00:51:02,320 --> 00:51:17,320
 At large seats result in a substantial deviation where minority groups are substantially underrepresented mixed results in a slight improvement and district is nearly directly proportional.

575
00:51:17,320 --> 00:51:20,320
 I think we're probably a happy medium.

576
00:51:20,320 --> 00:51:39,320
 That data and this is probably the case in several cities. We know stuff has happened throughout history assume that people are geographically distributed based on what community they belong to.

577
00:51:39,320 --> 00:51:47,320
 I mean, you know, I mean, yes, that's not necessarily the case all the time.

578
00:51:47,320 --> 00:51:56,320
 I mean, if you looked at the district makeups that we currently have, that's maybe not the case now for us in this.

579
00:51:56,320 --> 00:51:59,320
 I just I don't know without your data.

580
00:51:59,320 --> 00:52:08,320
 But we bake just by the pure fact that you have to district by geography. It's like a constraint, right?

581
00:52:08,320 --> 00:52:18,320
 Assumes that communities are also minority communities. All these other communities are also district geographically.

582
00:52:18,320 --> 00:52:29,320
 If you want to give them more representation, I don't know that that's necessarily the case.

583
00:52:29,320 --> 00:52:39,320
 I think there's an assumption that exists in that data and data shows that the less geographic concentration is the less bad that there is.

584
00:52:39,320 --> 00:52:44,320
 So you would be correct.

585
00:52:44,320 --> 00:52:55,320
 We have that data. It was provided to us because of the redistricting process. The city went through in 2021 and in Denton, broadly speaking, is a well distributed city.

586
00:52:55,320 --> 00:53:06,320
 There are some pockets where you have a we have currently right now one majority minority city council member district.

587
00:53:06,320 --> 00:53:10,320
 If you were to attempt to draw, of course, that's not what we're doing.

588
00:53:10,320 --> 00:53:16,320
 But if you were to attempt to draw more in the city of Denton, it's virtually impossible to do.

589
00:53:16,320 --> 00:53:22,320
 And people tried there when people were trying because we have generally speaking, a broad distribution.

590
00:53:22,320 --> 00:53:29,320
 There are, like I said, pockets and enclaves like any city has. We do have some historical things that have helped shape our city.

591
00:53:29,320 --> 00:53:37,320
 But we also have a city that has grown quite a bit. And as we've grown, the distribution has been pretty even.

592
00:53:37,320 --> 00:53:49,320
 There are not, like in some cities, especially some bigger cities, huge giant pockets of one type of person in no other type of person.

593
00:53:49,320 --> 00:53:54,320
 We have a roughly homogenous outside of a couple of areas distribution.

594
00:53:54,320 --> 00:54:00,320
 So I take Brian's point really well that I think the term was used last time, opportunity districts.

595
00:54:00,320 --> 00:54:04,320
 So that meaning again, that's a term from the political world.

596
00:54:04,320 --> 00:54:11,320
 A opportunity district is a place that's a potential opportunity for a to become a minority held seat.

597
00:54:11,320 --> 00:54:16,320
 And in some ways, I think that's the goal. And that's a positive thing to do.

598
00:54:16,320 --> 00:54:35,320
 You can't really create those very well. And then we have exactly one place where that has been possible to do because the distribution of ethnic groups is very it's very even compared to some other places, especially other places in the South.

599
00:54:35,320 --> 00:54:54,320
 If I may offer back up to what Jesse just said, having looked at the demographic distribution, it was part of what was the attachment page six that showed all the demographics were looked at.

600
00:54:54,320 --> 00:55:08,320
 And it lists all the individual districts. It lists the respective demographic and that the substantiated when the last three district was done.

601
00:55:08,320 --> 00:55:25,320
 One of the reasons that the city managed to save money on it was the process that evolved without totally utilizing the consultant.

602
00:55:25,320 --> 00:55:41,320
 There was a lot of animosity demonstrated on cultural. There was demonstration of the animosity between the populations that spoke either for or against it.

603
00:55:41,320 --> 00:55:59,320
 If I look at again, was going ahead and it's something else, but I am going to just stick it in here. There are several things that are in the model charter that when the city is doing redistricting, we may have come out right in regard to the numbers.

604
00:55:59,320 --> 00:56:15,320
 But we bypass several policies on it. Again, I would like to second the function or reiterate that I think we ought to take a look.

605
00:56:15,320 --> 00:56:36,320
 See where this vote stands in regard to what Jesse has put, and I will rephrase it or say it in my own that we do not recommend modifying the mix of single and at large districts, because otherwise we keep.

606
00:56:36,320 --> 00:56:45,320
 I don't know if this is appropriate to Texas or what the what phraseology of you're beating a dead horse.

607
00:56:45,320 --> 00:56:49,320
 Is that amendment to the language is that culture.

608
00:56:49,320 --> 00:56:53,320
 I don't think it's an amendment. I think it's a restatement.

609
00:56:53,320 --> 00:57:10,320
 I think we're still on Jesse's original motion, and I think we were second of that. And this is just to clarify, just for modifying the mix of single and at large districts. The next item we're going to bring back up from last meeting is the addition of new council seats.

610
00:57:10,320 --> 00:57:14,320
 So those are two separate votes, just for clarification.

611
00:57:14,320 --> 00:57:30,320
 All right. All those in favor of the motion to maintain the current balance, or current mix of single and at large districts, please say aye and raise your right hand.

612
00:57:30,320 --> 00:57:38,320
 All those opposed to say nay.

613
00:57:38,320 --> 00:57:46,320
 Is that court. I believe that we need a task at this moment so that motion fails.

614
00:57:46,320 --> 00:57:50,320
 Would we like to entertain a second motion.

615
00:57:50,320 --> 00:57:52,320
 I think that's going to be productive.

616
00:57:52,320 --> 00:57:54,320
 All right.

617
00:57:54,320 --> 00:57:58,320
 So, we just, we do we need a motion to postpone.

618
00:57:58,320 --> 00:58:07,320
 No, so this, this stays as is, if committee wants to bring it back at a later date, that can happen.

619
00:58:07,320 --> 00:58:09,320
 All right.

620
00:58:09,320 --> 00:58:12,320
 Commissioner Ross key point of order on this.

621
00:58:12,320 --> 00:58:16,320
 We have a quarter.

622
00:58:16,320 --> 00:58:22,320
 And we've got, quote, the numbers that we have.

623
00:58:22,320 --> 00:58:28,320
 Does it have to be eight, even if you don't have everybody here.

624
00:58:28,320 --> 00:58:44,320
 Because it's written specifically in the charge, the resolution that council passed that every recommendation that the committee puts forward has to receive a full majority of the full committee.

625
00:58:44,320 --> 00:58:59,320
 But if you look at the other way if they, if someone made a motion to change it, it would take eight in that manner as well. So until that until eight votes for something to change or to propose.

626
00:58:59,320 --> 00:59:04,320
 No action would be taken to the city council's my understanding.

627
00:59:04,320 --> 00:59:17,320
 I'm going to briefly reiterate that Robert's Rules of Orders indicate that commissioners should request the chair to speak.

628
00:59:17,320 --> 00:59:30,320
 Okay, so we will now move on to item number CRC 24 dash 009. Receive a report call the discussion and give staff direction on the need for additional council seats based on population size.

629
00:59:30,320 --> 00:59:36,320
 As Robert wrote, this item was postponed at our last meeting pending responses to outstanding committee questions.

630
00:59:36,320 --> 00:59:46,320
 Committee members received responses to questions prior to the meeting. The committee has any additional questions, please use the time to let staff know. If not, I'll open the floor for a brief discussion.

631
00:59:46,320 --> 00:59:53,320
 Any motions the committee. Does anyone have any questions for staff.

632
00:59:53,320 --> 01:00:07,320
 Forgive me I was just looking at these numbers right here. Do we have. So, and forgive me it may be in this projections on future growth for ourselves with comparable cities, where they're at.

633
01:00:07,320 --> 01:00:17,320
 So I have, I have hours, I do not have information on comparable cities. And the reason I asked that question is because sometimes you get caught in okay here's a comparable city.

634
01:00:17,320 --> 01:00:27,320
 We're going at a different rate than these other cities. Is that something that we could request for? I guess that's the request I have and if. Okay.

635
01:00:27,320 --> 01:00:32,320
 Like many other things, if things get pushed on to other needs.

636
01:00:32,320 --> 01:00:34,320
 Any other questions for staff.

637
01:00:34,320 --> 01:00:59,320
 I have a question. If the answer is no, then just a flat no is fine. But I wonder if staff has been given any direction in discussions about a process, if by election the city, the citizens choose to add council seats, because you can't just take the folks you got and shove them off to the side and add some on the end.

638
01:00:59,320 --> 01:01:09,320
 You have to have a redistricting process, which if you follow all the steps about $100,000 outside fees, maybe more to get sued after you set the districts.

639
01:01:09,320 --> 01:01:33,320
 And, and then you have to have basically a clean slate program wrong, but a clean slate single member district election.

640
01:01:33,320 --> 01:01:46,320
 What I just said that that line of thinking is that a discussion staff has already had about here's how this is going to have to go. Here's how the city attorney is going to have to advise the council on how to structure the next election.

641
01:01:46,320 --> 01:02:13,320
 If we add council seats conversation kind of happening already.

642
01:02:13,320 --> 01:02:25,320
 Any further questions for staff.

643
01:02:25,320 --> 01:02:45,320
 I appreciate I appreciate your question about growth and other cities. To me, the data we have, I think is already very helpful because the idea is we're talking about number of constituents to a council member and it's okay to look at a city that's bigger than us now and has the same number of council members.

644
01:02:45,320 --> 01:03:00,320
 But the idea that they might be bigger later, and they might need to add some seats later. It's kind of irrelevant to me. We already have comparables from cities that are bigger than we will be that have the same 7 on their city council.

645
01:03:00,320 --> 01:03:21,320
 So, I move that we recommend no change that we recommend to the city council no change in the current number of city council members further discussion.

646
01:03:21,320 --> 01:03:39,320
 All right, let's take a vote on that. All those in favor of recommending that we make no change in or no addition of new city council seats. Please raise your hand and say aye.

647
01:03:39,320 --> 01:03:54,320
 All those opposed, please raise your hand and say nay.

648
01:03:54,320 --> 01:04:15,320
 Item E, CRC 24, Bureau 13. Receive a report, hold a discussion and give staff direction on increasing the two-year council terms to three or four-year terms.

649
01:04:15,320 --> 01:04:26,320
 So, we're on charge E, increasing the two-year council term to a three or four-year term. So, this is the breakdown of the current provision.

650
01:04:26,320 --> 01:04:42,320
 The highlights or breakdown of that is that we currently have a two-year term, the term limit of three consecutive terms in a place and nothing prevents a council member from seeking election to another place, except if they have served 12 consecutive terms.

651
01:04:42,320 --> 01:04:52,320
 Any council member who becomes ineligible to run under these provisions can restore their eligibility by being off of council for one election cycle.

652
01:04:52,320 --> 01:05:18,320
 The history of this is that we have had two-year terms since our inception and state law allows the Texas Local Government Code stipulates that council members are elected for a two-year term unless they're established for a longer term, which is allowed by Texas Constitution, but cannot exceed a four-year term.

653
01:05:18,320 --> 01:05:35,320
 Some of the best practice recommendations, the National Civic League Model Charter recommends four-year staggered terms and the Texas Municipal League's Texas General Home Rule Charter book says was published in 2010, so it's a bit outdated.

654
01:05:35,320 --> 01:05:49,320
 Unfortunately, they haven't provided an updated version since then, but in 2010, they noted that a majority of Texas cities call for staggered two-year terms with a recent move to three or four-year terms.

655
01:05:49,320 --> 01:06:05,320
 Some of the, here's some of the surrounding city comparisons. As you can see, a lot of them have, Addison has a two-year term and then several of the others have moved to three-year terms in recent years.

656
01:06:05,320 --> 01:06:27,320
 And then here's comparable city comparison. As you can see, it kind of varies between two, three, and four-year terms and when they most recently updated them. And then we have a large city comparison just for context that kind of vary between four years.

657
01:06:27,320 --> 01:06:41,320
 Austin and El Paso have four years and then Dallas, Fort Worth, and San Antonio have two years. Oh no, Dallas and San Antonio are both going through charter reviews right now and they have a proposal on the table.

658
01:06:41,320 --> 01:06:52,320
 I'm not sure exactly where they are in those proposals or when they will be coming forward, but to increase the term in those two cities.

659
01:06:52,320 --> 01:07:06,320
 So with that, I know that's basic information open to whatever questions you all have for me and then committee discussion. And just as a reminder, if at the end of the discussion, the committee is ready to move forward with a motion.

660
01:07:06,320 --> 01:07:19,320
 The motion would be whether or not you recommend moving forward with changing the two-year term to either three or four and then either three or four.

661
01:07:19,320 --> 01:07:35,320
 Can you give us an idea if the committee were to adopt three or four-year terms? How would that be implemented? Would existing city councilors immediately receive term extensions or would that happen as?

662
01:07:35,320 --> 01:07:50,320
 That would have to be a conversation with legal.

663
01:07:50,320 --> 01:08:07,320
 You would have to say something like the time of the time council members and.

664
01:08:07,320 --> 01:08:14,320
 Right, because mechanically, you would need to say this.

665
01:08:14,320 --> 01:08:28,320
 You're changing the, you're staggering your elections differently. So you do have to sort of stretch some terms and then maybe stretch. If you were to do four years, stretch some terms by one year and some terms by two years and some terms by no years.

666
01:08:28,320 --> 01:08:47,320
 Okay, Mr. Davis, do we know how so Louisville just had their charter charter amendment to take in Castle Hills. They added the seat to represent specifically Castle Hills, and they changed their turn at the same time. They changed to a three-year term at the same time.

667
01:08:47,320 --> 01:08:59,320
 Do we know how they did it? Did they do it? Like, so in the government code, when you, when you first write your first charter, there's like a procedure for who gets a staggered, who gets a one-year term and who gets a two-year term.

668
01:08:59,320 --> 01:09:23,320
 Do we know if Louisville did something similar if they drew lots? Do we know kind of the process that they followed? I know I can certainly look into that though. I know that they did have a provision in their charter that allowed for switching from all at large districts to all single districts.

669
01:09:23,320 --> 01:09:39,320
 With the annexation of a large, a portion of land that was X amount of population, and that's exactly what they did in 2021. So I know that existed in their charter, but I don't think it's specified exactly how they did it, but I can get information on that.

670
01:09:39,320 --> 01:09:56,320
 I think there was, I'm not mistaken, I think there was something in there when they did the term change specifically on how they were going to do that. And the way that it happens when you first write your charter is that nobody gets an extension, you get a new council, and some people get a shorter term.

671
01:09:56,320 --> 01:10:02,320
 You draw straws basically for who's going to get one year and who's going to get two years.

672
01:10:02,320 --> 01:10:14,320
 Appreciate your insight, Commissioner Patrick. I wanted to clarify, forgive me, when you're going over consecutive terms, and you said 12 consecutive terms, I want to make sure the language on that, is that terms or years?

673
01:10:14,320 --> 01:10:28,320
 Terms. So it's terms? 12 years. Okay, so that was okay. And my second question is, so are we also discussing that, where we're setting maxes on that in this charter review?

674
01:10:28,320 --> 01:10:34,320
 Not within this charge, that would need to be something brought at a later date.

675
01:10:34,320 --> 01:11:02,320
 So my question is though, but do we have the opportunity to discuss that and bring that charge in this? We can. Anyone who wishes to submit an additional section of the charter for us to review should submit that to staff before our next meeting.

676
01:11:02,320 --> 01:11:21,320
 I don't know how you do it if you just say okay, your next, that person when they come up, you get a three year term if you get elected.

677
01:11:21,320 --> 01:11:46,320
 I believe Commissioner Davis described a system wherein current council members terms would not change, and you would have kind of like a single election cycle, where some people are getting elected for two and some people are getting elected for three, to create that staggering, and then once that's done you are three or four.

678
01:11:46,320 --> 01:12:00,320
 So current council members would not be having alterations. In other words all the elections wouldn't be coming up at the same time? Is that what you're saying? They would the first, I'm speaking out of order. Yeah, Commissioner Dammel.

679
01:12:00,320 --> 01:12:26,320
 So they would the first time you'd have like almost like a clean slate, but you would have like say just for example, this is an example, district one you get two years, district two you get one year district, three you get two years, you know, but it'd be understandable when that cycle would happen the next time after the one year, that first one year, then everyone would basically be on two years in that example.

680
01:12:26,320 --> 01:12:35,320
 I understand that people are getting vote for somebody for two years and this other district won. I don't have words, but I guess it would help.

681
01:12:35,320 --> 01:12:41,320
 I think you understood it as Commissioner Davis explained it.

682
01:12:41,320 --> 01:12:46,320
 You get walkiness.

683
01:12:46,320 --> 01:12:50,320
 We're really got a rabbit hole on this.

684
01:12:50,320 --> 01:12:56,320
 You know, going down the rabbit hole.

685
01:12:56,320 --> 01:12:59,320
 All of this meshes in.

686
01:12:59,320 --> 01:13:06,320
 Okay, we talk about whether or not we're going to keep a mix.

687
01:13:06,320 --> 01:13:09,320
 We go to all one format.

688
01:13:09,320 --> 01:13:13,320
 We talk about

689
01:13:13,320 --> 01:13:15,320
 the numbers.

690
01:13:15,320 --> 01:13:18,320
 And then you go into the terms.

691
01:13:18,320 --> 01:13:25,320
 You maintain, or you try to increase say to a three year term.

692
01:13:25,320 --> 01:13:32,320
 People generally, the way we do it now is 2024

693
01:13:32,320 --> 01:13:40,320
 had three people up for election. It was the two at large and the mayor.

694
01:13:40,320 --> 01:13:45,320
 2025 will have four districts.

695
01:13:45,320 --> 01:13:50,320
 So we have three in the one year, we have four in the other. That takes care of the seven.

696
01:13:50,320 --> 01:13:55,320
 If you go to a three year gap,

697
01:13:55,320 --> 01:14:02,320
 how are you going to be equitable to the population

698
01:14:02,320 --> 01:14:07,320
 and to their representative to take care of

699
01:14:07,320 --> 01:14:12,320
 the election that would come in 2026?

700
01:14:12,320 --> 01:14:18,320
 Realize anything that we recommend to the council.

701
01:14:18,320 --> 01:14:25,320
 We give them, they hear what we recommend in January, I believe.

702
01:14:25,320 --> 01:14:30,320
 They then go and vote on it. They put it on the ballot.

703
01:14:30,320 --> 01:14:38,320
 And we vote and the population votes on it in May of 25.

704
01:14:38,320 --> 01:14:44,320
 So nothing is really going to happen and change anything

705
01:14:44,320 --> 01:14:49,320
 until after 25.

706
01:14:49,320 --> 01:14:53,320
 Because of the timing.

707
01:14:53,320 --> 01:14:57,320
 You're right on that.

708
01:14:57,320 --> 01:15:01,320
 I may have added a year or subtracted it.

709
01:15:01,320 --> 01:15:06,320
 But one needs to take into account

710
01:15:06,320 --> 01:15:11,320
 when they look at the length of the terms.

711
01:15:11,320 --> 01:15:16,320
 How are you going to make an equitable distribution?

712
01:15:16,320 --> 01:15:21,320
 One way to do it would be to take district one and two and put them

713
01:15:21,320 --> 01:15:26,320
 and say, I'm just going to throw out here. Said I'm going to go into the 30s.

714
01:15:26,320 --> 01:15:30,320
 So it doesn't confuse me.

715
01:15:30,320 --> 01:15:35,320
 In 2030, district one and two get voted on.

716
01:15:35,320 --> 01:15:41,320
 District one, district three and four get voted on.

717
01:15:41,320 --> 01:15:51,320
 In district 32, we would then have the at-largest,

718
01:15:51,320 --> 01:15:57,320
 all of them, which are your two at-large and your mayor's position.

719
01:15:57,320 --> 01:16:05,320
 So that to me in my head for a statistical equal distribution

720
01:16:05,320 --> 01:16:14,320
 would take care of your three-year setup, I think.

721
01:16:14,320 --> 01:16:16,320
 Commissioner Johnson.

722
01:16:16,320 --> 01:16:19,320
 I prefer to just keep it simple.

723
01:16:19,320 --> 01:16:23,320
 And the reason why two terms, what happens if you get a representative

724
01:16:23,320 --> 01:16:27,320
 that doesn't do their job within the two years,

725
01:16:27,320 --> 01:16:32,320
 and then you got to wait another year to get them out of the seat?

726
01:16:32,320 --> 01:16:36,320
 I don't think that's fair to the people that vote.

727
01:16:36,320 --> 01:16:41,320
 So I highly suggest that we stick with the two terms.

728
01:16:41,320 --> 01:16:42,320
 Two years.

729
01:16:42,320 --> 01:16:43,320
 Two years terms.

730
01:16:43,320 --> 01:16:44,320
 Two years.

731
01:16:44,320 --> 01:16:47,320
 Two years terms.

732
01:16:47,320 --> 01:17:00,320
 I think Commissioner Johnson brings up a great point,

733
01:17:00,320 --> 01:17:03,320
 that you do have concern that when you do get someone in there

734
01:17:03,320 --> 01:17:05,320
 who is not representing their community,

735
01:17:05,320 --> 01:17:08,320
 and then you're stuck with them for an extended amount of time.

736
01:17:08,320 --> 01:17:09,320
 That's a great concern.

737
01:17:09,320 --> 01:17:13,320
 I hope it is for all of us.

738
01:17:13,320 --> 01:17:17,320
 You know, the other kind of on it too, though, is I, one thing that,

739
01:17:17,320 --> 01:17:19,320
 and I don't know how much this affects,

740
01:17:19,320 --> 01:17:22,320
 but one thing that I've seen that I've been in here in my time is,

741
01:17:22,320 --> 01:17:24,320
 as we're moving forward in the city and we have these plans,

742
01:17:24,320 --> 01:17:27,320
 these 2030s, these 2040s, which are coming upon us,

743
01:17:27,320 --> 01:17:31,320
 it seems like we have these broad visions, but then we're not,

744
01:17:31,320 --> 01:17:34,320
 I don't know if it's the stability of having so much turnover in city council

745
01:17:34,320 --> 01:17:37,320
 that we talk about, then we've got this 2040 plan.

746
01:17:37,320 --> 01:17:41,320
 A great example is the, and I'll get it wrong, downtown didn't design,

747
01:17:41,320 --> 01:17:44,320
 I forget how the Ds work and what order they're in.

748
01:17:44,320 --> 01:17:47,320
 But I find, you know, I think it's a really good plan.

749
01:17:47,320 --> 01:17:49,320
 But coming out of that city council meeting was very interesting

750
01:17:49,320 --> 01:17:52,320
 to talk with other residents who,

751
01:17:52,320 --> 01:17:56,320
 the majority of them said this to me, "Yeah, yeah, but it's never going to happen."

752
01:17:56,320 --> 01:17:58,320
 You know, and that's, that's what I think about too.

753
01:17:58,320 --> 01:18:03,320
 Does, if we do give more stability or more length to council members,

754
01:18:03,320 --> 01:18:06,320
 does that help that process where, you know,

755
01:18:06,320 --> 01:18:09,320
 maybe we take in some bigger swings, for lack of a better,

756
01:18:09,320 --> 01:18:12,320
 that we're really moving down the road?

757
01:18:12,320 --> 01:18:14,320
 So that's, that's just a question I had on that.

758
01:18:14,320 --> 01:18:16,320
 Why have we had the struggle on that?

759
01:18:16,320 --> 01:18:18,320
 But to mate's point, I can't,

760
01:18:18,320 --> 01:18:22,320
 I am not at all pushing back against the fact that we have bad actors,

761
01:18:22,320 --> 01:18:27,320
 and in my time we've had a few, you know, you don't want to wait three years.

762
01:18:27,320 --> 01:18:32,320
 So what I'm saying is I see some sides to this and trying to figure out what is best.

763
01:18:32,320 --> 01:18:34,320
 You know, and how do you decide, is two better than four?

764
01:18:34,320 --> 01:18:37,320
 Because four is great if you get somebody in there who's, hey, they're doing it,

765
01:18:37,320 --> 01:18:39,320
 they're coming out, they're listening to constituents,

766
01:18:39,320 --> 01:18:41,320
 they're willing to take in new information,

767
01:18:41,320 --> 01:18:44,320
 they're willing to say, "Hey, you know what, I was wrong on this."

768
01:18:44,320 --> 01:18:48,320
 But if you get somebody in there who is, and if for the wrong reasons,

769
01:18:48,320 --> 01:18:51,320
 especially if they're pocket lining or something of that nature,

770
01:18:51,320 --> 01:18:55,320
 then you get them on for four years and residents and citizens are thinking,

771
01:18:55,320 --> 01:18:58,320
 you know, that's when they start to lose faith a little bit more.

772
01:18:58,320 --> 01:19:01,320
 So, you know, that's where I kind of see both sides of it and I yield.

773
01:19:01,320 --> 01:19:03,320
 Commissioner Molina, four.

774
01:19:03,320 --> 01:19:06,320
 Yeah, I would just speak in favor of keeping it two years.

775
01:19:06,320 --> 01:19:09,320
 I think when you have a two-year term, you can't get comfortable.

776
01:19:09,320 --> 01:19:12,320
 You have to be responsible to your constituents.

777
01:19:12,320 --> 01:19:15,320
 Like, if you're there for four years, then come six months before the election,

778
01:19:15,320 --> 01:19:19,320
 no matter what side you fall on, you're like, "Oh, maybe I should start planning these."

779
01:19:19,320 --> 01:19:24,320
 When you have two years, like, what we need is folks on council to be having meet and greets,

780
01:19:24,320 --> 01:19:28,320
 to be having listening sessions, to be booking the libraries, to be active and engaged.

781
01:19:28,320 --> 01:19:33,320
 If we give them more time to get comfortable, to listen to bad actors and outside thoughts

782
01:19:33,320 --> 01:19:37,320
 or whoever you think is influencing the decisions, what happens to all the work the staff has done?

783
01:19:37,320 --> 01:19:41,320
 I agree with that downtown plan. I agree with what happens. It's awesome.

784
01:19:41,320 --> 01:19:47,320
 If we're giving them four years to, like, change their mind, I don't know, it gets a little sketch.

785
01:19:47,320 --> 01:19:50,320
 Commissioner Ramsey.

786
01:19:50,320 --> 01:19:55,320
 I'm not advocating for a three- or a four-year term.

787
01:19:55,320 --> 01:20:00,320
 I was just saying what you have to take into consideration, number one.

788
01:20:00,320 --> 01:20:08,320
 Number two, one of the things that can happen on a two-year term, and, you know, this is...

789
01:20:08,320 --> 01:20:14,320
 is sometimes it's thought that, number one, I get elected, okay, and I'm on,

790
01:20:14,320 --> 01:20:19,320
 and I've got to learn all of this stuff. I've got to come up to speed real fast.

791
01:20:19,320 --> 01:20:24,320
 Some people can come up to speed fast. Some people can't.

792
01:20:24,320 --> 01:20:31,320
 Okay? So if you were to have a three-year term, I'm playing bad enough, good enough.

793
01:20:31,320 --> 01:20:39,320
 If you have a three-year term, you allow for the person who maybe comes a little bit slower to get up to speed.

794
01:20:39,320 --> 01:20:42,320
 Now, do you want to elect a person like that?

795
01:20:42,320 --> 01:20:48,320
 [laughter]

796
01:20:48,320 --> 01:20:57,320
 At least, at least, it addresses the issue of allowing everybody in the community, okay?

797
01:20:57,320 --> 01:21:04,320
 Now, by that same token, if you get someone in there that it's, oh my gosh, okay,

798
01:21:04,320 --> 01:21:13,320
 whether they have a two-year, a three-year, or a four-year term, it is already written in the charter

799
01:21:13,320 --> 01:21:19,320
 that you could do something called a recall after six months.

800
01:21:19,320 --> 01:21:31,320
 So the recall could address the fact that you put someone in, be they two, three, or four,

801
01:21:31,320 --> 01:21:41,320
 and you find out that, oh my gosh, I didn't realize that they had nine I's and 12 years, or whatever it is, okay?

802
01:21:41,320 --> 01:21:43,320
 Is that a positive or a negative? Sorry.

803
01:21:43,320 --> 01:21:45,320
 [laughter]

804
01:21:45,320 --> 01:21:48,320
 I throw out on lambish things, okay?

805
01:21:48,320 --> 01:21:49,320
 [laughter]

806
01:21:49,320 --> 01:21:57,320
 And, you know, at that. But the idea is there is a recourse at any time,

807
01:21:57,320 --> 01:22:03,320
 and I just wanted to be sure that people remembered that.

808
01:22:03,320 --> 01:22:05,320
 Commissioner Ziegler?

809
01:22:05,320 --> 01:22:13,320
 Yes, I think, I agree with what Commissioner Lee, of course, said, but I think the two-year term keeps them on their toes.

810
01:22:13,320 --> 01:22:18,320
 And nobody needs to run for a city council seat that doesn't know what that job entails.

811
01:22:18,320 --> 01:22:27,320
 They better know it before they get in it, and if they're running, my idea is they better be prepared to hit the ground running.

812
01:22:27,320 --> 01:22:32,320
 It's not a place to be slow. It's a place to get to work.

813
01:22:32,320 --> 01:22:33,320
 Commissioner Fikes?

814
01:22:33,320 --> 01:22:41,320
 I was just going to say, Thousand Morning Days had an article that was written by Mike Rollins, Tom Leppert, and Ron Kirk.

815
01:22:41,320 --> 01:22:49,320
 And it was referring to the 15 proposals that they're committing, and they reduced it to 12.

816
01:22:49,320 --> 01:22:56,320
 And then they, being past mayors, gave feedback, and this one was specifically cited in there.

817
01:22:56,320 --> 01:23:02,320
 And it said many council races are decided by low voter turnout and razor-thin margins.

818
01:23:02,320 --> 01:23:10,320
 And from an accountability standpoint, these unfortunate electoral circumstances argue for shorter, not longer terms.

819
01:23:10,320 --> 01:23:19,320
 So having said that and all the discussion, it's okay with you. I'd like to make a motion to keep the term at two years.

820
01:23:19,320 --> 01:23:21,320
 Motion?

821
01:23:21,320 --> 01:23:25,320
 Seconded by Commissioner Ziegler.

822
01:23:25,320 --> 01:23:34,320
 I'll just say, from my part, I see the virtues of vote, and I think there's compelling arguments.

823
01:23:34,320 --> 01:23:42,320
 I would say three years. Four seems excessively long to me. But two years, I think I'll be voting for two years.

824
01:23:42,320 --> 01:23:52,320
 I've heard quite a few good arguments from the committee, as well as people kind of leaning on me in the community and saying, hey, you know, two years, two years is plenty.

825
01:23:52,320 --> 01:24:00,320
 My only hesitation is that I've spoken with some folks who have, I think, really been trying to address some very substantive issues in the city.

826
01:24:00,320 --> 01:24:10,320
 And what they've told me is that it feels like to them from January to May, elections are happening and nobody wants to touch big topics.

827
01:24:10,320 --> 01:24:17,320
 Nobody wants to work on important and difficult issues during that time because they're up for election.

828
01:24:17,320 --> 01:24:26,320
 And then from May to August or September, that's budget season and they're focused on the budget, which is, of course, incredibly important.

829
01:24:26,320 --> 01:24:32,320
 But that leaves very little time for consideration of kind of larger, more complex issues you get.

830
01:24:32,320 --> 01:24:39,320
 And I'm not trying to speak for staff or city councilors. I'm trying to speak on behalf of advocates in the community who have been working on issues.

831
01:24:39,320 --> 01:24:50,320
 But they said it feels like there's not very much time to actually try and get substantive issues. But on that note, the motion is to keep two year terms.

832
01:24:50,320 --> 01:24:57,320
 All in favor say aye. All those opposed say nay. All right.

833
01:24:57,320 --> 01:25:03,320
 That motion passes. The ayes have it. The recommendation is to keep the two year council term.

834
01:25:03,320 --> 01:25:17,320
 We're at six fifty seven, so I'm going to ask staff to present, but without discussion, item F number CRC two four zero one four.

835
01:25:17,320 --> 01:25:23,320
 Receiving a report to hold a discussion to give staff direction on modifying mayor and council stipend.

836
01:25:23,320 --> 01:25:31,320
 I'll be quick on this one as well. So the charge here is to evaluate modifying the council stipend.

837
01:25:31,320 --> 01:25:41,320
 So currently, this is the section of the charter. The breakdown of that is basically the mayor's stipend is a thousand dollars per month.

838
01:25:41,320 --> 01:25:45,320
 The council stipend is seven hundred and fifty dollars per month.

839
01:25:45,320 --> 01:25:53,320
 And then council, the charter does allow for council by ordinance to approve an adjustment to the stipend. There are some limits to that.

840
01:25:53,320 --> 01:26:01,320
 It can happen no more than once per fiscal year. No increase would take effect until the next regular term cycle.

841
01:26:01,320 --> 01:26:10,320
 And any increase should not exceed three percent of the then current stipend amount unless approved by a two thirds vote of council.

842
01:26:10,320 --> 01:26:17,320
 And then the stipend is reported in the annual city budget as a separate line item.

843
01:26:17,320 --> 01:26:27,320
 Some considerations, the history of this and the twenty seventeen charter election that mayor and council stipend was established for the first time.

844
01:26:27,320 --> 01:26:34,320
 Previously, council received reasonable reimbursement for related expenses, but was not otherwise compensated.

845
01:26:34,320 --> 01:26:46,320
 And then the state law that allows for this local government code section one one forty one authorizes councils to establish the salary for themselves by ordinance or through charter.

846
01:26:46,320 --> 01:26:58,320
 Some of the best practice recommendations, the national civic league model charter, the city should reimburse council members for expenses incurred and performing their duties.

847
01:26:58,320 --> 01:27:04,320
 Council should determine salary by ordinance, which allows for more flexibility and annual adjustments.

848
01:27:04,320 --> 01:27:15,320
 And the mayor should receive a higher amount than council members as the mayor has additional responsibilities, including intergovernmental ceremonial city related promotional responsibilities.

849
01:27:15,320 --> 01:27:37,320
 And then here's just a couple of the different types of council pay that I found per council meeting rates, a monthly rate, which is what we have an annual salary rate or a rate based on annual median income or some other amount.

850
01:27:37,320 --> 01:27:50,320
 This is this first graph is estimated take home of each the mayor's and council members stipends. You can see they do pay into federal FICA and Medicare.

851
01:27:50,320 --> 01:28:04,320
 Their federal income tax varies per person. So the net estimated take on these are estimates is nine hundred and twenty three dollars for the mayor and six hundred and ninety two for council members.

852
01:28:04,320 --> 01:28:17,320
 And this inflation adjustment is if we adjusted a thousand dollars and seven hundred and fifty dollars and what that what the value of that was in twenty seventeen to what that would look like today.

853
01:28:17,320 --> 01:28:29,320
 So you can see the one thousand dollars would be raised to twelve hundred and eighty one and the seven hundred and fifty dollars would be raised to five hundred and sixty one.

854
01:28:29,320 --> 01:28:43,320
 And then again we have some surrounding city comparisons and how much their mayor and council are compensated each month and then whether or not they this is governed by their charter or through ordinance.

855
01:28:43,320 --> 01:29:06,320
 You can see a lot of cities have moved to doing this through an ordinance as opposed to the charter and recent years. But we are relatively on you know it kind of varies between city to city but we're certainly not kind of worse in the middle of where these other surrounding cities are.

856
01:29:06,320 --> 01:29:18,320
 Comparable city comparisons a lot of them are still.

857
01:29:18,320 --> 01:29:29,320
 Comparable city compares Abilene is fun. They only get one dollar per year and most of these are done through the charter.

858
01:29:29,320 --> 01:29:39,320
 So you can kind of see the differences between their way go I could not find a definitive amount but I do believe they are compensated I just couldn't find an amount.

859
01:29:39,320 --> 01:29:54,320
 And then these are some full time council comparisons the larger cities do have full time councils. So these are annual salaries as opposed to monthly stipends or part time council like we have.

860
01:29:54,320 --> 01:30:09,320
 And El Paso recently you can see went to an annual median household income so they have something in their charter that basically says annually the salary will be changed based on AMI.

861
01:30:09,320 --> 01:30:24,320
 And I will note Fort Worth has done I think three or four unsuccessful charter amendments to raise their salaries.

862
01:30:24,320 --> 01:30:48,320
 Question. Yeah. You mentioned something about a 3% earlier. What was that. So the current provision allows for council to approve their own adjustment.

863
01:30:48,320 --> 01:31:01,320
 It just can't be more than 3% unless it's voted on by two thirds council to be a super majority.

864
01:31:01,320 --> 01:31:14,320
 So given that 3% that the council was approved in 2017. So that 3% was added up to right now which came up to $961.

865
01:31:14,320 --> 01:31:25,320
 So that's that's different. That's just what council can say in the provision right now. Council can increase theirs up to 3%.

866
01:31:25,320 --> 01:31:54,320
 So what and the inflation. These numbers are inflating it 28.17% which is just $17 to $24. So that's not actually what they're being paid now. I guess my question is if they had been making the adjustment themselves on the 3% up to now without taking it to the review board if they had approved an ordinance for them

867
01:31:54,320 --> 01:31:59,320
 to automatically do that. What would they be making now.

868
01:31:59,320 --> 01:32:03,320
 We got a banker right here.

869
01:32:03,320 --> 01:32:27,320
 There we go.

870
01:32:27,320 --> 01:32:33,320
 What's your total time so I'll get to this out of your regular job.

871
01:32:33,320 --> 01:32:41,320
 The mayor would have.

872
01:32:41,320 --> 01:32:48,320
 It really depends on the council member and how much they put into the council members.

873
01:32:48,320 --> 01:33:01,320
 For council members who didn't want to participate in other committees for whatever reason that council members that have been on as many outside committees they could super engaged remember Keely she had her meetings every month at that library.

874
01:33:01,320 --> 01:33:10,320
 So you really have a big range. It's hard to give an average because the difference in personalities. And of course the at large folks have a larger area generally to cover.

875
01:33:10,320 --> 01:33:30,320
 It is easy to spend 20 to 30 hours outside council meetings on council work answering emails talking constituents. It's easy to spend five hours per week per week plus work sessions so you have a Tuesday meeting right now every other Tuesday.

876
01:33:30,320 --> 01:33:41,320
 That can run anywhere between, you know, six to 10 hours depending on how many people are there's become zoning.

877
01:33:41,320 --> 01:33:53,320
 And if you're if you're putting into it what you would need to put into it you could spend, I'll say, on the low end 10 hours outside of outside of council meetings.

878
01:33:53,320 --> 01:34:14,320
 I would like, if possible for staff to send out a question to the current city counselor, and just ask them to maybe summarize their hourly commitments both numerically.

879
01:34:14,320 --> 01:34:35,320
 So, that's the question earlier for Mr Johnson is, is 19.4% so 1000 would go to 1194, right around 750 but nearly 20% which would be.

880
01:34:35,320 --> 01:34:46,320
 Once we get the, the number, the number of hours we just multiply times well like we're getting paid per hour, and that's what we should.

881
01:34:46,320 --> 01:34:57,320
 And let me start let me further it's that you like, I'm not looking to kind of pour through the hours and be like oh this counselor is spending so much less than this other counselor.

882
01:34:57,320 --> 01:35:07,320
 Maybe as an average, right. I'm not I'm not looking for that to be any sort of issue.

883
01:35:07,320 --> 01:35:14,320
 Oh yeah, to echo that if we do get that can we just call them counselors, a, b, and yes, yeah, I don't want to know.

884
01:35:14,320 --> 01:35:35,320
 I think you know we're not gonna be able to pay them a living wage.

885
01:35:35,320 --> 01:35:46,320
 As a reminder, we're postponing for discussion. So, these are these are questions for staff.

886
01:35:46,320 --> 01:35:55,320
 This is kind of interesting when I saw that the council had the authority to set their own based on 3%.

887
01:35:55,320 --> 01:36:11,320
 And when it takes effect to them. I'm surprised that no member of council was aware of that from 2017 to 2024. I know that they do about it but they just okay.

888
01:36:11,320 --> 01:36:31,320
 They haven't taken that opportunity. Do they, do they need the approval from the child board to actually pay themselves to make the adjustments to make the stipend adjustment, not within the current as the current provision is written.

889
01:36:31,320 --> 01:36:48,320
 They have the authority to buy ordinance annually adjusted up to 3%. If not, if more than that, it has to be approved by two thirds council. So short answer is yes, they do have that ability.

890
01:36:48,320 --> 01:37:01,320
 I'm good. I was just going to say the idea of if they wanted to take a bigger swing, they have to do a super majority. Correct. They want to go above 3% and do something larger has to be. Yes.

891
01:37:01,320 --> 01:37:20,320
 Commissioner Davis for their session next time, could we get a few more examples, and I believe just have how many or the best way to sample of some peer cities that that do it by ordinance, and how they set it up, because to Julie's point that she's highlighted.

892
01:37:20,320 --> 01:37:31,320
 They can't really even politically speaking it's very difficult for them to even adjust for inflation to do the 3% and 3% barely adjust for cost of living much less real inflation.

893
01:37:31,320 --> 01:37:51,320
 So, if we could get a little bit more information about how some of our peer cities do that, because I think that's probably where we best use our time is talking about how to how to really address that versus are going to pay him $150,000 a year, or we're going to pay him.

894
01:37:51,320 --> 01:38:11,320
 Yes, you said in the past, they had reimbursement for expenses, and then in the future, then they get the stipend. Do they still get to reimburse in addition to that stipend or is it now just a stipend, because the way it's presented now it's just a stipend they don't get to reimburse anymore.

895
01:38:11,320 --> 01:38:22,320
 They do get reimbursement for expenses incurred in their service. The thing that happens most often is travel for conferences and stuff like that.

896
01:38:22,320 --> 01:38:37,320
 So they are better related to that in the presentation so it shows that they are getting reimbursed for that because the way it was printed presented now they don't get reimbursed for that.

897
01:38:37,320 --> 01:38:43,320
 Do I need a motion to postpone the item. Yes.

898
01:38:43,320 --> 01:39:10,320
 I motion to postpone items CRC two for cash 014 until the September meeting.

899
01:39:10,320 --> 01:39:16,320
 All right, concluding items is the committee have any other business to discuss.

900
01:39:16,320 --> 01:39:41,320
 I have one point, the consecutive on the term. It says 12 consecutive years. So if I said five years, I did 10 years, and I set out a year. And it's nothing to say that I can't run for another 10 years, I set out that one year.

901
01:39:41,320 --> 01:39:53,320
 Correct. You are sitting out a term, not a year, or actually to your term. Okay, so if I set out that to your term, then I can come back and serve another 10.

902
01:39:53,320 --> 01:40:21,320
 Recently, I believe Commissioner, Councilmember Watts did six, six, two years off, came back and did another term. So is it 12 total? No, as long as you take a year off. You can switch from single member to at large and just take a year off. You can take a whole term off and go back to a single member. You can move across town and two years later run for another one. As long as it's just consecutive.

903
01:40:21,320 --> 01:40:25,320
 Any other concluding items.

904
01:40:25,320 --> 01:40:36,320
 I'd just like to follow up on Commissioner Fikes statement I believe it was in regard to the No Vulnerability Act.

905
01:40:36,320 --> 01:40:46,320
 One of the questions that we've given to staff was about, you know, the demographics of, you know, down to the precinct level, which wasn't available.

906
01:40:46,320 --> 01:41:07,320
 I, however, did go into the election results and went by district, which precincts were in which district, and what percentage of voters voted in May of 2024.

907
01:41:07,320 --> 01:41:31,320
 And we had the three at large in places five, six in the mayor. I also went back to 2023, when we had three of the four districts, and the reason it was only three of the four districts was one of the district commission council members did not have an opponent.

908
01:41:31,320 --> 01:41:45,320
 So he did not stand to vote. So for that one, I went back to 2021. Now granted, populations have it have varied.

909
01:41:45,320 --> 01:42:14,320
 And when you look at the population. It also gave me the number of actual registered voters at that respective election time, which doesn't necessarily, you know, relate, you can have 3000 residents but only 50 150,000 that actually are registered, because you got those that don't qualify by age, or just don't care.

910
01:42:14,320 --> 01:42:28,320
 If anybody would care for that information. If there's a way, I guess if I were to go under the comments or something as a means to send it.

911
01:42:28,320 --> 01:42:45,320
 I can send it as a blurb. I don't know if that's going to be email it to me I can share it with the committee. Okay, so if it goes out through you that I don't have to worry about that. Okay. So is anybody interested because we need to kind of clean up my

912
01:42:45,320 --> 01:42:58,320
 I would definitely be interested in receiving. Okay, appreciate the work. Generally, the turnout runs 10% from us.

913
01:42:58,320 --> 01:43:12,320
 So, you know, any one more question. Mr. Johnson, the recall. I've been reading, so I have questions. So with the recall, and maybe you can help me with this.

914
01:43:12,320 --> 01:43:19,320
 You don't have to have a solid reason to recall a person you just have to get signatures.

915
01:43:19,320 --> 01:43:27,320
 So we're, yeah, we're looking behind you talking about it.

916
01:43:27,320 --> 01:43:48,320
 I just have one quick announcement before we close. We kind of mentioned it briefly but the committee has the ability to review additional items that were not set out in the charge.

917
01:43:48,320 --> 01:44:03,320
 If you submit those to me either through the after committee survey, or just by email shoot me an email anytime with any additional sections of the charter that you'd like to review at our next meeting, we're going to bring all of those to the table

918
01:44:03,320 --> 01:44:18,320
 and any items that receive an eight person committee consensus will bring back towards the end of the committee process for the committee to discuss. So, that's my staff announcement.

919
01:44:18,320 --> 01:44:38,320
 You're going to do that next meeting. Correct. All right. If there's no other business, I will know during the meeting at 716 p.m. Thank you for your time, everyone, especially you a little late. Thank you.