WEBVTT 00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:09.320 Welcome to the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting for April 24, 2024. 00:00:09.320 --> 00:00:11.160 It is our work session. 00:00:11.160 --> 00:00:14.180 I'll commence our meeting to order at 5 p.m. 00:00:14.180 --> 00:00:18.800 Please let the record show that Commissioner Cole, Commissioner Thagard, and Chair Ellis 00:00:18.800 --> 00:00:21.000 are all absent at this time. 00:00:21.000 --> 00:00:25.920 With the court present, we will begin with our first point of item on the work session, 00:00:25.920 --> 00:00:27.920 clarification of agenda items. 00:00:27.920 --> 00:00:31.360 We will kick off with a review of our meeting minutes. 00:00:31.360 --> 00:00:34.280 Any questions on meeting minutes at this time? 00:00:34.280 --> 00:00:36.000 Okay. 00:00:36.000 --> 00:00:42.960 Seeing none, we'll move on to items for individual consideration, FP24-0010, and that's Julie. 00:00:42.960 --> 00:00:46.360 Come on up and take us away here. 00:00:46.360 --> 00:00:56.960 This is a final plat for Mayhill Multifamily. 00:00:56.960 --> 00:00:59.600 For most of y'all, this is a project that you've seen several times. 00:00:59.600 --> 00:01:04.480 It's for a multifamily development on Mayhill. 00:01:04.480 --> 00:01:07.960 They do have some items that they do need to address before we can recommend approval 00:01:07.960 --> 00:01:10.520 of this final plat, so we are recommending denial. 00:01:10.520 --> 00:01:16.480 However, we have no objection to the requested first extension to May 15, and I'll be happy 00:01:16.480 --> 00:01:18.040 to answer any questions. 00:01:18.040 --> 00:01:19.040 Great. 00:01:19.040 --> 00:01:20.360 Any questions for Julie? 00:01:20.360 --> 00:01:21.600 Thank you. 00:01:21.600 --> 00:01:22.600 Okay. 00:01:22.600 --> 00:01:24.600 Thank you, Julie. 00:01:24.600 --> 00:01:31.800 Next, we have a PP24-002A, that's being presented by Cameron. 00:01:31.800 --> 00:01:33.680 Good evening, Commission. 00:01:33.680 --> 00:01:36.000 Cameron Robertson, Principal Planner. 00:01:36.000 --> 00:01:41.440 This is a preliminary plot for the Hunter Ranch Amenity Center, phase one. 00:01:41.440 --> 00:01:46.520 Staff is recommending approval of the preliminary plot as it does apply with our established 00:01:46.520 --> 00:01:47.520 criteria. 00:01:47.520 --> 00:01:51.560 I'll stand for any questions. 00:01:51.560 --> 00:01:52.560 Don't see any questions. 00:01:52.560 --> 00:01:54.440 Thanks, Cameron. 00:01:54.440 --> 00:02:01.520 Next is item C, FP24-0011, presented by Angie Manglaris. 00:02:01.520 --> 00:02:03.980 Good evening. 00:02:03.980 --> 00:02:06.460 Angie Manglaris, Development Review Manager. 00:02:06.460 --> 00:02:09.760 This is a final plat for Stella Hills, phase one. 00:02:09.760 --> 00:02:15.560 It is located on East McKinney Street at the intersection of Laney Circle and East McKinney. 00:02:15.560 --> 00:02:21.440 This is 177 single-family lots on approximately 48 acres. 00:02:21.440 --> 00:02:25.920 At this time, the final plot does not comply with our criteria for approval. 00:02:25.920 --> 00:02:31.000 However, staff has no objection to the requested extension, which could be granted to a date 00:02:31.000 --> 00:02:32.000 certain of May 15th. 00:02:32.000 --> 00:02:37.160 Happy to answer any questions you may have. 00:02:37.160 --> 00:02:38.320 Is this the first extension? 00:02:38.320 --> 00:02:40.000 Yes, this is the first extension. 00:02:40.000 --> 00:02:41.000 Any other questions? 00:02:41.000 --> 00:02:42.000 Okay. 00:02:42.000 --> 00:02:43.000 Thank you very much. 00:02:43.000 --> 00:02:44.000 All right. 00:02:44.000 --> 00:02:45.000 Moving on to item 3D, FP24-0006D. 00:02:45.000 --> 00:02:51.920 Angie, that is also yours. 00:02:51.920 --> 00:02:52.920 Yes. 00:02:52.920 --> 00:02:54.720 Angie Manglaris, Development Review Manager. 00:02:54.720 --> 00:02:57.600 This is a final plat for JPI Multifamily. 00:02:57.600 --> 00:03:05.120 It is a 31-acre site located just west of Bonnie Bray and south of Bronco Way. 00:03:05.120 --> 00:03:09.280 At this time, the final plat does not meet all of our criteria for approval, and staff 00:03:09.280 --> 00:03:10.560 is recommending denial. 00:03:10.560 --> 00:03:14.560 However, staff has no objection to the requested extension, which could be granted to a date 00:03:14.560 --> 00:03:16.360 certain of May 15th. 00:03:16.360 --> 00:03:18.680 This would be their fourth extension request. 00:03:18.680 --> 00:03:22.440 Happy to answer any questions you may have. 00:03:22.440 --> 00:03:28.240 Any questions? 00:03:28.240 --> 00:03:30.140 How close are we getting? 00:03:30.140 --> 00:03:35.800 They have a few lingering comments on their CEPs, and that is the remaining item to be 00:03:35.800 --> 00:03:36.800 addressed. 00:03:36.800 --> 00:03:39.920 There are a few engineering comments that just need to be resolved, and they're going 00:03:39.920 --> 00:03:44.320 back and forth with our third-party engineering reviewers to get that resolved. 00:03:44.320 --> 00:03:45.320 We are close. 00:03:45.320 --> 00:03:46.760 It's just taking a little bit of time. 00:03:46.760 --> 00:03:49.320 You think this would be the last extension? 00:03:49.320 --> 00:03:50.320 This would be the... 00:03:50.320 --> 00:03:57.040 It's hard to say, because I'm not an engineer, and I'm not fully versed in everything that 00:03:57.040 --> 00:03:59.720 needs to be done to address those comments. 00:03:59.720 --> 00:04:01.680 They are extremely close. 00:04:01.680 --> 00:04:05.760 I would expect that it could be done by May 15th. 00:04:05.760 --> 00:04:12.520 The comments that are there, it's not so material that it's making an issue. 00:04:12.520 --> 00:04:16.400 They're on the verge of possibly not even being able to move forward with the requirements. 00:04:16.400 --> 00:04:20.600 Yeah, it's not anything necessarily related to making the site work or having serious 00:04:20.600 --> 00:04:22.840 concerns with how it's laid out. 00:04:22.840 --> 00:04:25.960 It's more of just there are some standard details I believe that they need to address 00:04:25.960 --> 00:04:28.360 to meet all of our requirements. 00:04:28.360 --> 00:04:31.520 They're actively communicating with a third-party engineering firm? 00:04:31.520 --> 00:04:34.200 Yes, they've been working back and forth regularly, yes. 00:04:34.200 --> 00:04:35.200 Got you. 00:04:35.200 --> 00:04:36.680 Any other questions, comments? 00:04:36.680 --> 00:04:37.680 Okay. 00:04:37.680 --> 00:04:38.680 Thank you, Angie. 00:04:38.680 --> 00:04:46.680 Next is item 3E, FP24-0009A, and that's Mia. 00:04:46.680 --> 00:04:53.760 Good evening, Chair, Acting Chair, members of the commission. 00:04:53.760 --> 00:04:54.880 Mia Hines, Senior Planner. 00:04:54.880 --> 00:05:00.440 This item is a final plan for Hickory Grove phase two, which is just under 60 acres located 00:05:00.440 --> 00:05:06.800 north of West University Drive and east of Thomas J. Egan in the city's ETJ. 00:05:06.800 --> 00:05:13.040 As of the publication of our backup for this meeting, that final plan was not ready for 00:05:13.040 --> 00:05:14.040 approval. 00:05:14.040 --> 00:05:18.320 Since then, staff has worked with the applicants to get that to a point of approval. 00:05:18.320 --> 00:05:23.040 We are now recommending approval of the updated final plan version that was sent out to you 00:05:23.040 --> 00:05:26.440 all yesterday. 00:05:26.440 --> 00:05:29.440 With that, I'll take any questions or comments you have. 00:05:29.440 --> 00:05:30.440 Okay. 00:05:30.440 --> 00:05:31.440 That's good. 00:05:31.440 --> 00:05:32.440 Thank you, Mia. 00:05:32.440 --> 00:05:39.840 And then last Friday, I'm going to have an individual consideration, 3F, V24-0001, Bryce. 00:05:39.840 --> 00:05:41.280 How's it going, Commission? 00:05:41.280 --> 00:05:42.280 Take it away. 00:05:42.280 --> 00:05:50.760 Bryce VanArsdale, Assistant Planner. 00:05:50.760 --> 00:05:57.440 This is V24-0001, so in summary, this is a request to increase the allowable length of 00:05:57.440 --> 00:06:00.480 a flag drive from 300 to 600 feet. 00:06:00.480 --> 00:06:04.080 This property is located on the west side of Hilltop Road, just north of East Hickory 00:06:04.080 --> 00:06:05.080 Hill Road. 00:06:05.080 --> 00:06:10.280 And I also included the portion of the DDC below that this is referencing. 00:06:10.280 --> 00:06:11.840 Staff is recommending approval of this. 00:06:11.840 --> 00:06:14.520 I do want to note they don't have a plat application yet. 00:06:14.520 --> 00:06:17.360 They wanted to go ahead and work through the variance process before working through that 00:06:17.360 --> 00:06:18.360 process. 00:06:18.360 --> 00:06:20.360 I'm here for any questions. 00:06:20.360 --> 00:06:21.360 Okay. 00:06:21.360 --> 00:06:22.360 Got any questions? 00:06:22.360 --> 00:06:23.360 All right. 00:06:23.360 --> 00:06:24.360 Thank you, Bryce. 00:06:24.360 --> 00:06:26.360 You want to hang out up there? 00:06:26.360 --> 00:06:34.360 Yes, move on to item four, public hearings, start with 4A, Z24-0003, and Bryce will take 00:06:34.360 --> 00:06:35.360 us through this. 00:06:35.360 --> 00:06:36.360 Good evening, Commission. 00:06:36.360 --> 00:06:37.360 Bryce VanArsdale, Assistant Planner. 00:06:37.360 --> 00:06:40.360 This is Z24-0003. 00:06:40.360 --> 00:06:46.360 This is a request to rezone a 1.52 acre property from residential, or from, excuse me, suburban 00:06:46.360 --> 00:06:48.120 corridor to residential six. 00:06:48.120 --> 00:06:52.480 The intent is to match the adjacent properties to the north and the east, which are owned 00:06:52.480 --> 00:06:54.840 by the same property owner. 00:06:54.840 --> 00:06:56.720 Currently is undeveloped pastureland. 00:06:56.720 --> 00:07:02.000 In addition, the future land use map shows this area to be a low residential and community 00:07:02.000 --> 00:07:03.620 mixed use area. 00:07:03.620 --> 00:07:04.620 Staff is recommending approval. 00:07:04.620 --> 00:07:08.720 I'm here for any questions. 00:07:08.720 --> 00:07:09.720 Any questions? 00:07:09.720 --> 00:07:13.840 I have a couple here, Bryce. 00:07:13.840 --> 00:07:14.840 Absolutely. 00:07:14.840 --> 00:07:18.240 To the west, that SC property. 00:07:18.240 --> 00:07:19.640 Yes, sir. 00:07:19.640 --> 00:07:24.400 That is, there's already an end user that's on that site, correct, or has it already got 00:07:24.400 --> 00:07:25.400 that? 00:07:25.400 --> 00:07:28.840 I do believe there is some storage application, or an application for storage development 00:07:28.840 --> 00:07:29.840 going in. 00:07:29.840 --> 00:07:31.840 I believe Angie, yeah. 00:07:31.840 --> 00:07:34.440 So we do have some process working through with that. 00:07:34.440 --> 00:07:40.160 And just a minor note as well, that as this lot is split zoned, Commissioner Pruitt pointed 00:07:40.160 --> 00:07:43.440 that out the other day, with the plotting process, that will be divided, so it's no 00:07:43.440 --> 00:07:45.160 longer going to be a split zone property. 00:07:45.160 --> 00:07:46.160 Gotcha. 00:07:46.160 --> 00:07:48.920 It'll be entirely as we expect it within the same limits. 00:07:48.920 --> 00:07:54.480 We won't run any enforcing any type of setbacks or screening or that kind of stuff with SC 00:07:54.480 --> 00:07:57.640 and high density residential next to it. 00:07:57.640 --> 00:08:00.160 There's nothing that we're going to run into there. 00:08:00.160 --> 00:08:01.560 It's one on single plot now. 00:08:01.560 --> 00:08:02.560 It's split zoned. 00:08:02.560 --> 00:08:04.680 It would be split zoned if this was approved. 00:08:04.680 --> 00:08:06.360 There's already an end user. 00:08:06.360 --> 00:08:08.960 I know they've got the application in for it. 00:08:08.960 --> 00:08:13.080 We're not past the stage in which we can enforce the correct screening or anything like that 00:08:13.080 --> 00:08:14.080 from a city standpoint. 00:08:14.080 --> 00:08:15.080 No, sir. 00:08:15.080 --> 00:08:19.320 So the zoning compliance between the CEPs, we can address that. 00:08:19.320 --> 00:08:22.360 And like I say, it will no longer be a split zone lot once the platting is done as well. 00:08:22.360 --> 00:08:23.360 Sure. 00:08:23.360 --> 00:08:24.360 Yeah. 00:08:24.360 --> 00:08:26.960 Just more like it's split zoned and then we're going to do the replatting and it's like there's 00:08:26.960 --> 00:08:28.960 two different projects that are happening at the same time. 00:08:28.960 --> 00:08:29.960 Absolutely. 00:08:29.960 --> 00:08:30.960 It's just making sure you don't want to have like screening. 00:08:30.960 --> 00:08:37.720 I'd hate if this got rezoned and this becomes a residential neighborhood that there's not 00:08:37.720 --> 00:08:38.720 good screening in between. 00:08:38.720 --> 00:08:39.720 Absolutely. 00:08:39.720 --> 00:08:40.720 So that makes sense. 00:08:40.720 --> 00:08:43.400 When either one of those projects or both of those projects get there, we would enforce 00:08:43.400 --> 00:08:45.280 that screening for the DDC. 00:08:45.280 --> 00:08:46.280 Okay. 00:08:46.280 --> 00:08:47.280 Tina? 00:08:47.280 --> 00:08:49.960 And I would just add, so the zoning compliance plan has already been approved for this site. 00:08:49.960 --> 00:08:55.360 So knowing the residential zoning, that is it, well, actually at the time that zoning 00:08:55.360 --> 00:09:01.400 compliance plan was done, it was evaluated with the SC zoning being in place. 00:09:01.400 --> 00:09:05.640 So it was not evaluated with residential zoning being adjacent to it. 00:09:05.640 --> 00:09:10.160 So keep in mind that the developer of the storage unit facility has vested rights associated 00:09:10.160 --> 00:09:12.080 with their approved zoning compliance plan. 00:09:12.080 --> 00:09:16.760 So what does that ultimately mean for screening and as well, what's buffering a residential 00:09:16.760 --> 00:09:21.560 area when you've got a, you know, having SC next to residential, there's traditionally 00:09:21.560 --> 00:09:25.120 screening and setback rules within there, but if you're saying the ZCP is already in there, 00:09:25.120 --> 00:09:28.400 there's vested rights within there, could there be, if there's a rezone, could there 00:09:28.400 --> 00:09:34.560 be a possibility of that, what would typically be in the code for SC against R6, that the 00:09:34.560 --> 00:09:37.800 screening and setbacks wouldn't be enforceable or how's that? 00:09:37.800 --> 00:09:40.720 So we would not retroactively apply if that's what you're asking. 00:09:40.720 --> 00:09:45.960 So because they already have a zoning compliance plan approved for the storage facility site, 00:09:45.960 --> 00:09:49.720 and now if this zoning goes through for a single family residential on this property, 00:09:49.720 --> 00:09:54.600 we are not going to go back and retroactively apply additional standards. 00:09:54.600 --> 00:09:59.560 Because at the time when the zoning compliance plan was evaluated and was approved, we took 00:09:59.560 --> 00:10:02.120 into consideration the known conditions at that time. 00:10:02.120 --> 00:10:04.320 And so that was SC zoning on this property. 00:10:04.320 --> 00:10:10.440 But the traditional screening and setback rules that apply to SC versus next to R6 would 00:10:10.440 --> 00:10:11.440 still be enforced. 00:10:11.440 --> 00:10:14.720 There's not, what I heard you say right then, there's not additional standards that we're 00:10:14.720 --> 00:10:15.720 going to enforce. 00:10:15.720 --> 00:10:19.720 We're not going to retroactively enforce additional standards, but the ZCP that's already in there 00:10:19.720 --> 00:10:22.680 is including the already required screening, it's already in the development code. 00:10:22.680 --> 00:10:23.680 That's correct. 00:10:23.680 --> 00:10:27.800 It would have any required screening improvements that were necessary for the property to the 00:10:27.800 --> 00:10:29.440 east of it being zoned SC. 00:10:29.440 --> 00:10:30.440 Gotcha. 00:10:30.440 --> 00:10:31.440 Okay. 00:10:31.440 --> 00:10:32.440 Understood. 00:10:32.440 --> 00:10:33.440 Okay. 00:10:33.440 --> 00:10:35.000 Commissioner Brut. 00:10:35.000 --> 00:10:42.800 Just for clarification, I mean, once a residential application comes through for the three parcels 00:10:42.800 --> 00:10:50.640 that were mentioned in the backup, at subdivision plat, they would have the requirement to justify 00:10:50.640 --> 00:10:56.080 or to provide the screening that our code does within that subdivision plat, right? 00:10:56.080 --> 00:11:04.400 So keep in mind you're dealing with, the screening requirements are a product of zoning, right? 00:11:04.400 --> 00:11:11.400 So any, if this property had already been successfully zoned residential and the storage 00:11:11.400 --> 00:11:16.200 unit development came in after the zoning that's in place, we would apply the appropriate 00:11:16.200 --> 00:11:19.340 standards per the DDC associated with zoning. 00:11:19.340 --> 00:11:23.880 The subdivision of the land is not triggering certain screening improvements and Bryce and 00:11:23.880 --> 00:11:27.000 Haley keep me honest on this if I'm speaking out of turn. 00:11:27.000 --> 00:11:31.760 But because those screening requirements are a function of zoning, typically they're applied. 00:11:31.760 --> 00:11:35.560 When we look at a site that is being reviewed for development, we look at the surrounding 00:11:35.560 --> 00:11:38.360 properties, we look at the zoning that's on those surrounding properties to see if any 00:11:38.360 --> 00:11:40.280 of those additional standards kick in. 00:11:40.280 --> 00:11:44.320 So they're tied to the zoning of the property, not whether or not someone's proposing to 00:11:44.320 --> 00:11:45.640 subdivide the property. 00:11:45.640 --> 00:11:46.640 Got it. 00:11:46.640 --> 00:11:47.640 Thank you. 00:11:47.640 --> 00:11:52.360 So, but still it would be evaluated at zoning compliance plan for a residential development 00:11:52.360 --> 00:11:54.520 on the R6 parcel. 00:11:54.520 --> 00:11:55.520 Right. 00:11:55.520 --> 00:12:02.040 So, yes, so with the R6 development occurring, if R6 was required to install any additional 00:12:02.040 --> 00:12:06.680 screening requirements because it's adjacent to a commercial property, we would apply those. 00:12:06.680 --> 00:12:10.840 But typically it's the commercial zoned properties that have the higher performance standard 00:12:10.840 --> 00:12:12.480 than the single family residential neighborhoods. 00:12:12.480 --> 00:12:13.480 Okay. 00:12:13.480 --> 00:12:14.480 Thank you. 00:12:14.480 --> 00:12:16.920 I think that was my multiple of my concern is that the commercial properties traditionally 00:12:16.920 --> 00:12:20.520 have the higher requirements when they're going against residential rather than residential 00:12:20.520 --> 00:12:21.640 being against commercial. 00:12:21.640 --> 00:12:26.880 It's about who's the onus of having to do the screening is where my concern was. 00:12:26.880 --> 00:12:31.040 And so it sounds like the onus is going to be on the R6, is what I've heard, is that 00:12:31.040 --> 00:12:36.400 the ZCP, if this was to be rezoned, subdivided plats and everything is all the same, there's 00:12:36.400 --> 00:12:40.040 no longer a split zone property that's there, so it's all in the same there. 00:12:40.040 --> 00:12:45.420 Then when that ZCP gets done for that R6, that screening requirement applies, which 00:12:45.420 --> 00:12:49.960 could be less than what it could be compared to the SC having to go through a new screening. 00:12:49.960 --> 00:12:50.960 That is correct. 00:12:50.960 --> 00:12:51.960 I understand. 00:12:51.960 --> 00:12:54.160 Thank you very much. 00:12:54.160 --> 00:12:59.080 And then Bryce, the only question I had was, I'm sure you'll get into it, but I think 00:12:59.080 --> 00:13:03.840 from my understanding, a TIA was not required for this because it's only one and a half 00:13:03.840 --> 00:13:05.880 acres. 00:13:05.880 --> 00:13:10.360 My only question I think was just in regards to when we talked to engineering as we're, 00:13:10.360 --> 00:13:15.040 this is being rezoned to be lumped in with the seven and a half to the east for a total 00:13:15.040 --> 00:13:16.040 development, right? 00:13:16.040 --> 00:13:18.760 And I know that we're focusing on the one and a half acres. 00:13:18.760 --> 00:13:23.440 That's the only piece of property we're talking about for tonight's item, right? 00:13:23.440 --> 00:13:29.560 But from an engineering standpoint, mobility, I should really say, from that standpoint, 00:13:29.560 --> 00:13:34.160 all nine acres together at some point in time later on the road, a TIA would be required, 00:13:34.160 --> 00:13:35.160 correct? 00:13:35.160 --> 00:13:36.160 Yes, sir. 00:13:36.160 --> 00:13:37.160 And just for clarity, it is 18 acres total. 00:13:37.160 --> 00:13:38.160 18 acres, sorry. 00:13:38.160 --> 00:13:39.160 Yes, sir. 00:13:39.160 --> 00:13:40.160 Whatever that number is. 00:13:40.160 --> 00:13:45.120 It looks like a big lot, and I just guess, so I'll just take a big old stab at it. 00:13:45.120 --> 00:13:49.000 So we'll hand it to the TIA, we'll come with the, I believe it's the CEPs and the ZCP stage. 00:13:49.000 --> 00:13:50.000 Gotcha. 00:13:50.000 --> 00:13:51.000 That's what I understood. 00:13:51.000 --> 00:13:52.000 Okay. 00:13:52.000 --> 00:13:53.000 Good. 00:13:53.000 --> 00:13:54.000 Any other questions? 00:13:54.000 --> 00:13:55.000 Okay. 00:13:55.000 --> 00:13:56.000 Thank you, Bryce. 00:13:56.000 --> 00:13:57.000 Appreciate it. 00:13:57.000 --> 00:13:58.000 Thank you. 00:13:58.000 --> 00:13:59.000 All right. 00:13:59.000 --> 00:14:06.360 Next is item 4B, S24-0001, and that is Ashley. 00:14:06.360 --> 00:14:07.360 Good evening. 00:14:07.360 --> 00:14:13.880 Ashley Eckstead, Associate Planner. 00:14:13.880 --> 00:14:17.400 This is S24-1, RDO Equipment. 00:14:17.400 --> 00:14:21.680 This is a request to allow for a John Deere commercial use, which is considered an equipment 00:14:21.680 --> 00:14:27.280 sales and rental use, and this use will also include accessory uses such as retail, sales 00:14:27.280 --> 00:14:30.380 office, product displays, warehousing, and equipment servicing. 00:14:30.380 --> 00:14:31.780 This may look familiar to you. 00:14:31.780 --> 00:14:35.080 This was before you as a rezoning in February. 00:14:35.080 --> 00:14:38.760 The existing zoning is shown on the map on the left. 00:14:38.760 --> 00:14:43.080 The blue is light industrial, and the future land use map is on the right. 00:14:43.080 --> 00:14:46.360 The blue is light industrial, and the purple is industrial commerce. 00:14:46.360 --> 00:14:50.400 This is an approximately 10-acre site located on the south side of US 380, west of Mosh 00:14:50.400 --> 00:14:54.800 Branch Road, and I do have a longer presentation for the public hearing, but happy to answer 00:14:54.800 --> 00:14:57.200 any questions now also. 00:14:57.200 --> 00:15:00.200 See any questions? 00:15:00.200 --> 00:15:01.200 Okay. 00:15:01.200 --> 00:15:02.200 Thank you, Ashley. 00:15:02.200 --> 00:15:03.200 Appreciate it. 00:15:03.200 --> 00:15:04.200 Thanks. 00:15:04.200 --> 00:15:09.600 With that, I'll take us to the end of clarification of our agenda items, so I will move on to 00:15:09.600 --> 00:15:17.520 work session agenda item number two, and that is 2A PZ24-074, receive a report and hold 00:15:17.520 --> 00:15:21.040 discussion regarding the Razor Ranch Overlay District, and Haley's got this. 00:15:21.040 --> 00:15:22.040 All right. 00:15:22.040 --> 00:15:23.040 Good evening, Commission. 00:15:23.040 --> 00:15:26.120 Haley Zagurski, Assistant Planning Director. 00:15:26.120 --> 00:15:30.040 So today's discussion is really intended to tee up a future item that will be before you 00:15:30.040 --> 00:15:34.760 all, so this is informational only today just to give some background since we do have some 00:15:34.760 --> 00:15:38.920 new members of the Commission, but later this summer you will see some ordinance amendments 00:15:38.920 --> 00:15:43.040 coming forward related to Razor Ranch. 00:15:43.040 --> 00:15:47.000 So just to give some background, the Razor Ranch Overlay District was a product of our 00:15:47.000 --> 00:15:51.880 2002 development code that did authorize us to do zoning overlays to give an additional 00:15:51.880 --> 00:15:55.600 layer of regulations on top of the base zoning. 00:15:55.600 --> 00:15:59.360 You'd see something of this nature more frequently as a plan development under our current code, 00:15:59.360 --> 00:16:04.160 but we did have overlays in lieu of plan developments in the 02 code. 00:16:04.160 --> 00:16:09.160 The Razor Ranch Overlay includes all of the area outlined in black on the map, so it's 00:16:09.160 --> 00:16:11.040 approximately 400 acres of land today. 00:16:11.040 --> 00:16:16.560 It started out as about 410, but a few parcels have been zoned out of the overlay in recent 00:16:16.560 --> 00:16:17.560 years. 00:16:17.560 --> 00:16:21.960 You can see it does cover land on both sides of University Drive, both north and south, 00:16:21.960 --> 00:16:25.200 roughly between 35 and Bonnie Bray. 00:16:25.200 --> 00:16:26.680 It is a mix of residential and commercial. 00:16:26.680 --> 00:16:30.640 I'm sure you're familiar with the area as it's one of our regional shopping hubs. 00:16:30.640 --> 00:16:33.760 And if you've been out there recently, you may have noticed it's primarily built out. 00:16:33.760 --> 00:16:38.040 Here between 85 and 90% of the land area is actually accounted for today. 00:16:38.040 --> 00:16:45.760 But there are a few remaining vacant parcels as well as opportunities for redevelopment or additional things to be added in the future on the property. 00:16:45.760 --> 00:16:54.360 So to give some background as to why we're going to be bringing forward ordinance amendments, I wanted to start at the very beginning. 00:16:54.360 --> 00:17:02.920 So Razor Ranch, before it came to the city as a proposal, was actually created as a set of deed restrictions by the property owners of this collective land area. 00:17:02.920 --> 00:17:08.560 About 2006, those deed restrictions, if you look at the county, include concept plan, 00:17:08.560 --> 00:17:14.040 land designations as to what uses would go where, as well as development standards for the property. 00:17:14.040 --> 00:17:19.920 Those deed restrictions are not enforceable by the city of Denton, and they don't match line for line with what the city's ordinances have. 00:17:19.920 --> 00:17:24.080 One of the key things that that did create, though, was an architectural review board. 00:17:24.080 --> 00:17:29.320 So people who are interested in developing in Razor Ranch, similar to you would if you have an HOA for 00:17:29.320 --> 00:17:33.040 your neighborhood would go before that board with their proposal. 00:17:33.040 --> 00:17:37.040 We hope they do that before they come to us so that we know they have that blessing when they show up here. 00:17:37.040 --> 00:17:44.600 But sometimes we do share that news with them, and then they go back and do that concurrent with when they're going through our review process. 00:17:44.600 --> 00:17:50.320 In 2007 is when the city officially adopted the first ordinance related to Razor Ranch. 00:17:50.320 --> 00:17:56.680 At that time we did comprehensive plan amendments for our future land use map as well as our mobility plan related to this area. 00:17:56.680 --> 00:18:02.640 In that first phase of zoning standards, again based off the 2002 code, was adopted in 07, 00:18:02.640 --> 00:18:05.280 and those ordinances are what is enforceable by the city of Denton. 00:18:05.280 --> 00:18:11.480 The regulatory text of the Razor Ranch overlay, so the land uses, the dimensional standards, 00:18:11.480 --> 00:18:15.960 the processes for how it goes through amendments and adopt site plans, 00:18:15.960 --> 00:18:21.400 were originally housed in section 35.7.15 of our 2002 code. 00:18:21.400 --> 00:18:26.320 If you read through that part of the DDC at the time, you would find reference to a lot of exhibits, lettered A through H. 00:18:26.320 --> 00:18:30.680 And you would go looking through the code and not be able to find them because they were never housed in the DDC. 00:18:30.680 --> 00:18:33.920 Those were all separate ordinances that had to be referenced. 00:18:33.920 --> 00:18:39.080 And those were all the design standards for it, the architecture, the streetscaping, landscaping, and those things. 00:18:39.080 --> 00:18:49.360 Cumulatively since 2007, we've adopted over 20 ordinances related to Razor Ranch that just build upon each other, replace parts of one another. 00:18:49.360 --> 00:18:51.560 It's a bit of controlled chaos to be honest. 00:18:52.920 --> 00:18:58.000 Most of the standards in the Razor's ordinance, you'll see, refer back to the 2002 DDC, so 00:18:58.000 --> 00:19:03.360 they'll say this property was zoned RCCD with these exceptions, everything else defers to the code. 00:19:03.360 --> 00:19:08.080 So it's a really piece-mealed process to read through that ordinance and figure out what applies. 00:19:08.080 --> 00:19:17.160 We did a couple of attempts at kind of major overhauls in 2008 after it was first done, and then again in '16, but they were not comprehensive by any means. 00:19:17.160 --> 00:19:22.160 And many of those ordinances, if you look at them, only apply to certain lots or certain sub-areas within Razor Ranch. 00:19:23.880 --> 00:19:28.280 When we adopted the 2019 code, some of you may recall we created a placeholder for 00:19:28.280 --> 00:19:35.200 Razor Ranch with the intent to eventually fold it into the DDC and control the chaos and get it all housed in one place. 00:19:35.200 --> 00:19:41.600 So if you look in our overlay chapter of the code today in 4.8, you'll see Razor Ranch listed as an overlay district. 00:19:41.600 --> 00:19:44.560 And then it will refer you to Appendix A, which does not exist yet. 00:19:44.560 --> 00:19:50.600 So that's what we hope to bring before you all this summer to finally get it formally adopted as one ordinance in lieu of 20. 00:19:53.080 --> 00:19:58.360 So this is just a screenshot, because I put together a table to show you all those 23 ordinances that relate to Razor. 00:19:58.360 --> 00:20:01.520 If you read through them, you'll see a lot of them are piece-mealed for certain areas. 00:20:01.520 --> 00:20:04.080 One of them is literally just for one lot. 00:20:04.080 --> 00:20:08.280 And then over time, it's just built upon this chaos. 00:20:08.280 --> 00:20:16.440 Like I said, in 2016 was that last major amendment, but if you read it, it still refers you back to 2008 and 2010 versions of the ordinance for specific parcels. 00:20:16.440 --> 00:20:23.400 So very cumbersome for people who are interested in developing a Razor as well as for staff to get a handle on. 00:20:23.400 --> 00:20:28.480 So just walking you through the areas of Razor, we do have the marketplace, 00:20:28.480 --> 00:20:34.280 which is the north side of 380 and the south campus, which is the whole area south of 380. 00:20:34.280 --> 00:20:39.400 So the regulations depend on which half of the campus that you're in. 00:20:39.400 --> 00:20:44.400 And then within those, we have multiple sub areas that each have their own sets of architectural and design standards as well. 00:20:44.400 --> 00:20:47.080 So just a quick overview of those. 00:20:47.080 --> 00:20:55.160 The RR2 area, which I just learned this week after years of working with Razor, Razor Ranch stood for regional retail. 00:20:55.160 --> 00:20:56.880 We've always wondered what the RR stood for. 00:20:56.880 --> 00:20:58.560 I finally found it. 00:20:58.560 --> 00:21:02.520 So the RR2 area is what's shown in yellow on the north side. 00:21:02.520 --> 00:21:08.920 That's more of the smaller box stores, what they call the junior anchor stores, as well as a lot of the smaller out parcels. 00:21:08.920 --> 00:21:14.360 The RR3 area is those big boxes, so Home Depot, Sam's, Walmart, and things of that nature. 00:21:14.360 --> 00:21:19.160 And then there is the residential portion that a lot of people don't necessarily realize is within Razor Ranch, but 00:21:19.160 --> 00:21:23.560 that's recently been developing with some single family for rent, as well as town home units. 00:21:23.560 --> 00:21:31.320 And then on the south side, we have the town center area that you're all probably familiar with that has the convention center and 00:21:31.320 --> 00:21:34.960 the movie theater and uses of that nature, more of the entertainment area. 00:21:34.960 --> 00:21:38.880 We've recently seen some site plans for residential in this area as well. 00:21:38.880 --> 00:21:43.480 And then we have the south RR2, which is kind of that perimeter that's a lot of the smaller pad site, 00:21:43.480 --> 00:21:46.280 retail, restaurants type uses. 00:21:46.280 --> 00:21:51.520 And then we have what they call the South Mixed Use District, which is primarily residential. 00:21:51.520 --> 00:21:58.800 Also contains the Razor Ranch Park that was recently dedicated to the city just a few years ago, as well as some hotel and office lots as well. 00:21:58.800 --> 00:22:06.120 This area also contains a DME substation, which you may have noticed driving on Bonnie Bray. 00:22:06.120 --> 00:22:12.880 It has the Cooke Children's Property, which still has quite a bit of vacant land area that they can develop in the future with medical uses. 00:22:12.880 --> 00:22:15.360 And then the Gaswell site that's also adjacent to Bonnie Bray. 00:22:15.360 --> 00:22:25.240 So the purpose of the overlay and why we're carrying it forward is because it does provide for that consistency in design throughout Razor Ranch. 00:22:25.240 --> 00:22:30.240 So like I mentioned, it has standards for consistency in signage, architecture, landscaping, 00:22:30.240 --> 00:22:36.160 things just to give you that feel that you know you're in a designated place that was kind of master planned while you're there. 00:22:36.160 --> 00:22:42.240 So if you look at some of the buildings, you'll see compatible building materials to use throughout consistency and color palette. 00:22:42.240 --> 00:22:48.400 They have a very neutral theme for all of their buildings, as well as similarities in roof style, lighting, and things of those natures. 00:22:48.400 --> 00:22:50.880 So it helps create the feeling of being in Razor Ranch. 00:22:50.880 --> 00:22:54.520 It also provides for that compatible mix of land uses. 00:22:54.520 --> 00:22:59.840 So they do, throughout the overlay, pull out some of the uses that we might typically see allowed in these areas. 00:22:59.840 --> 00:23:02.560 There's no industrial uses, for example, within Razor. 00:23:02.560 --> 00:23:06.200 It's all commercial and residential type uses. 00:23:06.200 --> 00:23:12.360 And then the other thing that occurs within the Razor Ranch overlay is they did ask for certain trade offs when it was adopted. 00:23:12.360 --> 00:23:21.240 So one of the most significant examples is you'll see tons of parking at Razor Ranch because they were exempted from the parking maximums of the code at the time. 00:23:21.240 --> 00:23:22.400 That is carried forward for them. 00:23:22.400 --> 00:23:27.840 They do some additional storm water treatments to account for that parking. 00:23:27.840 --> 00:23:34.440 But some of the key things the city got as trade offs for that were those architectural details that we don't see elsewhere in the city. 00:23:34.440 --> 00:23:38.880 We don't enforce a color palette anywhere else within the city of Denton, for example. 00:23:38.880 --> 00:23:42.440 They also require plaza and open space with all of the developments throughout Razor. 00:23:42.440 --> 00:23:50.760 So there's a minimum standard that each lot has to account for, whereas we don't normally see that sort of public gathering space required with our commercial uses elsewhere in the city. 00:23:50.760 --> 00:23:57.040 And then, as you all are familiar with, their site plans do come to PNZ for that extra level of scrutiny beyond just staff's level of approval. 00:23:59.520 --> 00:24:07.120 So as I've mentioned throughout the challenge with Razor and why we'll be coming back before you all is because we have this franken ordinance of all these pieces. 00:24:07.120 --> 00:24:14.120 The 20 individual ordinances or over 20, as well as the 2002 code that we have to comb through to enforce this district. 00:24:14.120 --> 00:24:18.640 I mentioned in 2016, we tried to do as a city a comprehensive update, but 00:24:18.640 --> 00:24:25.280 certain landowners within Razor were very concerned about losing privileges that they had gotten approved back in 2008 and 2010. 00:24:25.280 --> 00:24:33.320 So we carried it forward and said, we're going to do all of these great things, but you still, for these lots, have to go back to these ordinances and find these old rules and old processes that apply. 00:24:33.320 --> 00:24:40.520 So we're bringing all of that into the modern era and into the 2019 code as Appendix A of the DDC so 00:24:40.520 --> 00:24:46.760 that everyone, city staff as well as our customers, will have one place to go look for the Razor Ranch ordinances. 00:24:46.760 --> 00:24:53.040 Another reason for this is because in 2019, you may recall the legislative changes that occurred relating to building materials. 00:24:53.040 --> 00:24:57.200 We can no longer enforce a significant portion of the architectural standards at Razor. 00:24:57.200 --> 00:25:03.280 Their architectural board can still enforce those on the private side, but we'll be changing those two recommendations within our code so 00:25:03.280 --> 00:25:07.640 that it no longer creates that conflict for staff of not being able to enforce our ordinance. 00:25:07.640 --> 00:25:16.240 So we've been working with a consultant for the, I would say a little over a year now, to get all of those consolidated into one document. 00:25:16.240 --> 00:25:21.480 She's done a great job of combing through all of them, pulling together everything that each lot needs and 00:25:21.480 --> 00:25:26.840 kind of reformatting it all into one usable document, as well as coming through the entire 2002 code and 00:25:26.840 --> 00:25:32.760 going section by section and pulling forward everything that they relied upon that's changed in the 2019 code. 00:25:32.760 --> 00:25:37.600 So for parking, for example, if they have a use that has a ratio from the old code, 00:25:37.600 --> 00:25:42.920 we've brought that forward into the Razor Ranch district, otherwise they'll just go to the 2019 standards like everyone else. 00:25:42.920 --> 00:25:48.960 So we're not changing anything on them, but we are reformatting it all and making it more usable. 00:25:48.960 --> 00:25:54.840 Right now, we're soliciting feedback from the owners of Razor Ranch to make sure that they're all on board with everything that we're bringing forward. 00:25:54.840 --> 00:25:59.180 And then once we have that, we'll be coming to you all in the next few months for your consideration and 00:25:59.180 --> 00:26:04.080 hopefully formal adoption by council of this new consolidated Razor Ranch document. 00:26:04.080 --> 00:26:06.200 And with that, I'm happy to answer any questions. 00:26:06.200 --> 00:26:10.000 >> Any questions for Haley? 00:26:10.000 --> 00:26:13.320 Commissioner Pruitt. 00:26:13.320 --> 00:26:15.200 >> Thank you, Chair. 00:26:15.200 --> 00:26:16.440 Can you go back to the last slide? 00:26:16.440 --> 00:26:19.720 I just didn't quite make it through the second half here. 00:26:19.720 --> 00:26:24.320 So just to make sure I understand, it sounds like 00:26:24.320 --> 00:26:32.000 portions of the regulations that are in effect now, 00:26:32.000 --> 00:26:40.000 which are identical to the base 2019 adopted DDC will be 00:26:40.000 --> 00:26:45.000 brought forward and within that appendix, it will refer to the rest of the DDC. 00:26:45.000 --> 00:26:45.760 >> Correct. >> However, 00:26:45.760 --> 00:26:50.760 anything that is different either in an overlay that's applicable to a particular 00:26:50.760 --> 00:26:57.160 zoning district or referring to a portion of the 2002 code, 00:26:57.160 --> 00:27:02.760 which was different than our current code, would be instantiated within the appendix. 00:27:02.760 --> 00:27:03.600 >> Correct. 00:27:03.600 --> 00:27:09.640 >> Okay, how are the zoning districts going to be handled? 00:27:09.640 --> 00:27:21.120 Because we've gone to a little bit of a different nomenclature of districts as well as overlays don't exactly existed before. 00:27:21.120 --> 00:27:22.000 >> Correct. 00:27:22.000 --> 00:27:25.240 >> Can you help me understand just what the vision is there? 00:27:25.240 --> 00:27:29.440 >> Sure, so what it will look like is, similar to this map, 00:27:29.440 --> 00:27:34.200 we are calling out the sub areas within Razor as their own areas and all of those zoning 00:27:34.200 --> 00:27:42.720 standards that were from the RCCD or NRMU district under the 02 code have just been brought forward as the standards for that new sub district within Razor Ranch. 00:27:42.720 --> 00:27:49.120 >> Okay. >> So it's in effect no longer an overlay because we're not having to overlay on top of any base district. 00:27:49.120 --> 00:27:51.200 But we've brought forward all of those standards. 00:27:51.200 --> 00:27:59.720 The density, the dimensional standards, the setbacks, all of that will now be housed just within the Razor Ranch area written for that sub district. 00:27:59.720 --> 00:28:03.520 >> All right, and are we going to maintain the naming of the sub districts? 00:28:03.520 --> 00:28:05.000 >> We've modified them slightly. 00:28:05.000 --> 00:28:11.000 >> Okay. >> Like I mentioned, since we didn't know what RR stood for, rather than continuing to call it by an acronym we did not know the meaning of. 00:28:11.000 --> 00:28:17.160 We were like, now the south RR2 district is going to be the south commercial district and the town center will just be the town center. 00:28:17.160 --> 00:28:19.040 >> Okay, that's great. 00:28:19.040 --> 00:28:19.560 Thank you. 00:28:19.560 --> 00:28:22.520 >> Okay, any other questions for Hailey? 00:28:22.520 --> 00:28:27.880 Okay, thank you Hailey, I appreciate it. 00:28:27.880 --> 00:28:30.640 With that, that takes the end of our agenda for our work session. 00:28:30.640 --> 00:28:39.720 So I will call our work session to an end here at 528, we'll reconvene in chambers at 630. 00:28:39.720 --> 00:28:54.320 >> Good evening and welcome to the regularly scheduled session for the Denton City Planning and 00:28:54.320 --> 00:28:59.400 Zoning Commission, April 24th of 2024, being at 630, I'll go ahead and call our meeting to order. 00:29:00.560 --> 00:29:06.120 Before us to first begin, I'd like to recognize that Commissioner Thaggard and Chair Ellis are absent. 00:29:06.120 --> 00:29:10.920 And we will move on to our first item on our agenda, which will be the Pledge of Allegiance. 00:29:10.920 --> 00:29:13.640 So if you're able, please stand and give the US and Texas flag. 00:29:13.640 --> 00:29:23.080 >> I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America, and to the Republic for which it stands, 00:29:23.080 --> 00:29:27.920 one nation, under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. 00:29:29.680 --> 00:29:37.400 >> I pledge allegiance to the Texas flag, and I pledge allegiance to the Texas, one state, under God, one and indivisible. 00:29:37.400 --> 00:29:45.000 >> Moving on to our agenda item number two, consider the approval of the Planning and 00:29:45.000 --> 00:29:48.560 Zoning Commission meeting minutes, PZ 24-063. 00:29:48.560 --> 00:29:49.320 Commissioner Villarreal? 00:29:49.320 --> 00:29:51.800 >> Move approval. 00:29:51.800 --> 00:29:52.600 >> Commissioner Pruitt? 00:29:52.600 --> 00:29:53.100 >> Second. 00:29:53.100 --> 00:29:55.640 >> With a first and a second, we have any discussion? 00:29:55.640 --> 00:29:59.280 Okay, seeing none, I'll move us to have a vote on the board. 00:29:59.680 --> 00:30:08.160 [BLANK_AUDIO] 00:30:08.160 --> 00:30:11.040 That item passes 6-0. 00:30:11.040 --> 00:30:17.440 Okay, moving on to item three, starting with 3A, FP 24-0010. 00:30:17.440 --> 00:30:19.080 I'll be presented by Julie Wyatt. 00:30:19.080 --> 00:30:24.520 [BLANK_AUDIO] 00:30:24.520 --> 00:30:27.480 >> Good evening, I'm Julie Wyatt, principal planner at the city. 00:30:27.480 --> 00:30:33.400 This is FP 24-0010, it is Mayhill Multifamily Addition. 00:30:33.400 --> 00:30:38.640 This property is located on the west side of Mayhill, just north of Russell Newman. 00:30:38.640 --> 00:30:44.920 This site was the subject of a specific use permit that was approved last year for a multifamily development. 00:30:44.920 --> 00:30:49.200 They're now coming in with the platting for this property in the development process. 00:30:49.200 --> 00:30:55.640 They do have a couple of items that they do need to address in order for staff to be able to recommend approval. 00:30:55.640 --> 00:30:59.360 However, they have requested an extension, that 30 day extension. 00:30:59.360 --> 00:31:02.000 It is the first one, and we have no objection to that. 00:31:02.000 --> 00:31:03.200 I'll be happy to answer any questions. 00:31:03.200 --> 00:31:05.760 >> Thank you, Julie. 00:31:05.760 --> 00:31:06.360 >> Thank you. 00:31:06.360 --> 00:31:07.320 >> I don't see any questions. 00:31:07.320 --> 00:31:08.800 Commissioner Villarreal. 00:31:08.800 --> 00:31:13.400 >> Move approval of the extension request to a date certain of May 15th, 2024. 00:31:13.400 --> 00:31:16.920 >> Okay, Commissioner Desiree, Mayor Pedrone, sorry. 00:31:16.920 --> 00:31:18.240 >> I second. 00:31:18.240 --> 00:31:22.120 >> All right, with a first and a second to continue to date certain, any discussion? 00:31:22.120 --> 00:31:24.960 Okay, seeing none, we'll move for a vote on the board. 00:31:25.640 --> 00:31:35.520 Motion passes 5-0. 00:31:35.520 --> 00:31:44.720 Moving on to item 3B, that'll be PP24-0002A presented here by Ms. Cameron Robertson. 00:31:44.720 --> 00:31:47.040 >> Good evening, Cameron Robertson, Principal Planner. 00:31:47.040 --> 00:31:54.640 This is PP24-002A, this is for the Hunter Ranch Phase 1 Amenity Center. 00:31:54.640 --> 00:31:56.880 This is approximately eight acres, 00:31:56.880 --> 00:32:03.080 located just north of Robeson Ranch Road, west of Interstate 35W. 00:32:03.080 --> 00:32:05.320 Staff is recommending approval this evening for 00:32:05.320 --> 00:32:09.360 the preliminary plot, as it meets all our criteria, and I can stand for any questions. 00:32:09.360 --> 00:32:13.280 >> Hey, Cameron, before I take a motion, 00:32:13.280 --> 00:32:17.200 I just want to make the record known that Commissioner Cole has recused himself. 00:32:17.200 --> 00:32:22.240 I don't see any questions for Cameron, but I will take a motion in a second. 00:32:25.160 --> 00:32:26.120 >> Commissioner Pruitt? 00:32:26.120 --> 00:32:26.760 >> I'll move approval. 00:32:26.760 --> 00:32:28.560 >> Commissioner Patrone? 00:32:28.560 --> 00:32:32.240 >> It's not working, but I second. 00:32:32.240 --> 00:32:33.360 It's working. 00:32:33.360 --> 00:32:35.440 >> Okay, first and a second, have any discussion? 00:32:35.440 --> 00:32:38.280 Okay, seeing none, we'll move for a vote on the board. 00:32:53.520 --> 00:32:57.040 Okay, that motion passes 4-0 with one recusal. 00:32:57.040 --> 00:33:04.240 Moving on to item 3C, FP24-0011, presented by Angie Manglaris. 00:33:04.240 --> 00:33:07.280 >> Good evening, Chair, members of the commission. 00:33:07.280 --> 00:33:09.280 Angie Manglaris, Development Review Manager. 00:33:09.280 --> 00:33:12.640 This is FP24-0011. 00:33:12.640 --> 00:33:17.040 This is a final plot for Phase 1 of Stella Hills Residential Subdivision. 00:33:17.040 --> 00:33:22.280 This is on approximately 48 acres, consisting of 177 lots on East McKinney 00:33:22.280 --> 00:33:25.800 Street at the intersection of East McKinney and Laney Circle. 00:33:25.800 --> 00:33:28.640 At this time, there still are some outstanding comments to address, 00:33:28.640 --> 00:33:30.120 and staff is recommending denial. 00:33:30.120 --> 00:33:32.640 However, we have no objection to the request of extension, 00:33:32.640 --> 00:33:35.520 which could be granted to a date certain of May 15th. 00:33:35.520 --> 00:33:37.200 This would be their first extension request. 00:33:37.200 --> 00:33:38.920 Happy to answer any questions. 00:33:38.920 --> 00:33:40.360 >> Thank you, Angie. 00:33:40.360 --> 00:33:41.840 I don't see any questions. 00:33:41.840 --> 00:33:43.000 Commissioner Villarreal? 00:33:43.000 --> 00:33:47.160 >> Move approval of the extension request to a date certain of May 15th, 2024. 00:33:47.160 --> 00:33:48.240 >> Thank you, Commissioner Cole? 00:33:48.240 --> 00:33:49.720 >> Second. 00:33:49.720 --> 00:33:51.480 >> With a first and a second, we have any discussion? 00:33:52.360 --> 00:33:54.560 Okay, let's go ahead and call for a vote on the board. 00:33:54.560 --> 00:34:04.560 That motion passes five, zero. 00:34:04.560 --> 00:34:08.640 Moving on to item 3D, FP24-0006D. 00:34:08.640 --> 00:34:12.640 Once again, Angie, back up to the podium. 00:34:12.640 --> 00:34:14.120 >> Thank you, Chair, members of the commission. 00:34:14.120 --> 00:34:17.520 This is FP24-0006D. 00:34:17.520 --> 00:34:20.240 This is a final plot for JPI at Bonnie Bray. 00:34:20.240 --> 00:34:23.960 It is a multifamily development on approximately 31 acres. 00:34:23.960 --> 00:34:28.400 It's located just west of Bonnie Bray and south of Bronco Way. 00:34:28.400 --> 00:34:31.320 At this time, staff is recommending denial of the final plot, 00:34:31.320 --> 00:34:33.840 as it does not yet meet all of our criteria for approval. 00:34:33.840 --> 00:34:36.240 However, we have no objection to the request of extension, 00:34:36.240 --> 00:34:39.200 which could be granted to a date certain of May 15th. 00:34:39.200 --> 00:34:40.960 This would be their fourth extension request. 00:34:40.960 --> 00:34:42.840 Happy to answer any questions you may have. 00:34:42.840 --> 00:34:46.840 >> I don't see any questions, Angie. 00:34:46.840 --> 00:34:47.840 Thank you. 00:34:49.960 --> 00:34:56.280 >> Do I have a motion or a second in regards to this? 00:34:56.280 --> 00:34:57.480 Commissioner Pruitt? 00:34:57.480 --> 00:35:00.720 >> I'll move to approve the applicant requested extension 00:35:00.720 --> 00:35:03.000 to May 15th, 2024. 00:35:03.000 --> 00:35:03.880 >> Okay, Commissioner Cole? 00:35:03.880 --> 00:35:05.400 >> Second. 00:35:05.400 --> 00:35:08.240 >> First and second, any discussion? 00:35:08.240 --> 00:35:10.560 Okay, seeing none, call for a vote on the board. 00:35:19.360 --> 00:35:22.320 That motion passes 5-0. 00:35:22.320 --> 00:35:28.760 Next up, 3EFP24-0009A, Mia Hines to present. 00:35:28.760 --> 00:35:31.440 >> Good evening, Chair, members of the commission, 00:35:31.440 --> 00:35:32.920 Mia Hines, senior planner. 00:35:32.920 --> 00:35:36.080 This item is a final plot for Hickory Grove Phase 2. 00:35:36.080 --> 00:35:40.280 The site is just under 60 acres located north 00:35:40.280 --> 00:35:42.320 of West University Drive and east-- 00:35:42.320 --> 00:35:44.400 I'm sorry, west of Thomas J. Egan Road. 00:35:44.400 --> 00:35:49.000 At the time of the publication of your backup, 00:35:49.000 --> 00:35:51.920 the final plot was not ready for approval or recommendation 00:35:51.920 --> 00:35:55.520 of approval, but staff has since worked with the applicant 00:35:55.520 --> 00:35:58.280 and so we are recommending approval of the revised copy 00:35:58.280 --> 00:36:00.600 that was sent out to this body yesterday. 00:36:00.600 --> 00:36:03.520 With that, I'll take any questions or comments. 00:36:03.520 --> 00:36:05.680 >> I don't see any, Mia. 00:36:05.680 --> 00:36:06.680 Thank you. 00:36:06.680 --> 00:36:10.920 I'll entertain a motion. 00:36:10.920 --> 00:36:12.280 Commissioner Pruitt? 00:36:12.280 --> 00:36:15.320 >> Move approval of the revised plot. 00:36:15.320 --> 00:36:17.400 >> Okay, a second, Commissioner Cole? 00:36:17.400 --> 00:36:19.760 >> A first and a second. 00:36:19.760 --> 00:36:20.800 No discussion. 00:36:20.800 --> 00:36:23.080 Go ahead and call for a vote on the board. 00:36:23.080 --> 00:36:33.040 That motion passes 5-0. 00:36:33.040 --> 00:36:35.480 Last item of items for individual consideration, 00:36:35.480 --> 00:36:42.040 that would be 3EFFV24-0001, presented by Bryce Van Arsdale. 00:36:42.040 --> 00:36:46.880 >> Good evening, Commission, Bryce Van Arsdale, 00:36:46.880 --> 00:36:47.680 Assistant Planner. 00:36:47.680 --> 00:36:51.760 This is V24-0001. 00:36:51.760 --> 00:36:54.720 So this site is located on the west side of Hilltop Road, 00:36:54.720 --> 00:36:57.240 just north of East Hickory Hill. 00:36:57.240 --> 00:37:01.200 The zoning is in the ETJ Division 1 of the city of Denton. 00:37:01.200 --> 00:37:04.520 The applicant is proposing to subdivide the property 00:37:04.520 --> 00:37:06.960 in order to split an existing church building 00:37:06.960 --> 00:37:08.600 from the remainder of the lot, which 00:37:08.600 --> 00:37:11.840 is existing as a recreational vehicle storage at the moment. 00:37:11.840 --> 00:37:13.680 The lot to be created on the western portion 00:37:13.680 --> 00:37:15.280 of the property will be taken access 00:37:15.280 --> 00:37:18.760 via a flag drive from Hilltop Road. 00:37:18.760 --> 00:37:20.440 The requested variance is to increase 00:37:20.440 --> 00:37:24.880 the allowable length of a flag drive from 300 to 600 feet. 00:37:24.880 --> 00:37:26.440 And it will connect to Hilltop Road, 00:37:26.440 --> 00:37:28.760 which is a variable width secondary arterial. 00:37:28.760 --> 00:37:30.920 And the proposed flagpole portion of the lot 00:37:30.920 --> 00:37:33.880 is approximately 75 feet wide. 00:37:33.880 --> 00:37:35.840 There are some considerations for the Commission 00:37:35.840 --> 00:37:38.320 to have whenever they are reviewing these. 00:37:38.320 --> 00:37:42.000 First off, if approved, the variance 00:37:42.000 --> 00:37:45.120 is not anticipated to be detrimental to public safety. 00:37:45.120 --> 00:37:47.200 The city of Denton Fire Department 00:37:47.200 --> 00:37:49.920 has reviewed and approved this application. 00:37:49.920 --> 00:37:51.800 Additionally, if the variance is approved, 00:37:51.800 --> 00:37:55.200 the lot that is created would be of a regular shape and layout. 00:37:55.200 --> 00:37:58.120 And due to the significant depth in relation 00:37:58.120 --> 00:38:02.160 to the width of the property, the flag drive 00:38:02.160 --> 00:38:06.720 is necessary in order to justify the access. 00:38:06.720 --> 00:38:08.760 If approved, the increase in the allowable length 00:38:08.760 --> 00:38:10.320 of the flagpole portion of the lot 00:38:10.320 --> 00:38:11.800 will not introduce design centers 00:38:11.800 --> 00:38:14.880 that are incompatible with the DDC. 00:38:14.880 --> 00:38:16.680 And additionally, the conditions associated 00:38:16.680 --> 00:38:18.040 with the subject property were not 00:38:18.040 --> 00:38:20.880 created by the property owner himself. 00:38:20.880 --> 00:38:22.680 Staff does recommend approval of this request 00:38:22.680 --> 00:38:25.320 as it meets all of the criteria set out within the DDC. 00:38:25.320 --> 00:38:28.400 And I'm here for any questions. 00:38:28.400 --> 00:38:29.320 I don't see any, Bryce. 00:38:29.320 --> 00:38:29.800 Thank you. 00:38:29.800 --> 00:38:31.920 Thank you. 00:38:31.920 --> 00:38:34.960 OK, I'll entertain a motion. 00:38:34.960 --> 00:38:36.320 Commissioner Cole? 00:38:36.320 --> 00:38:37.960 I'll make a motion to approve. 00:38:37.960 --> 00:38:38.800 Commissioner Pruitt? 00:38:38.800 --> 00:38:39.800 Second. 00:38:39.800 --> 00:38:43.160 First and a second, we have any discussion? 00:38:43.160 --> 00:38:45.280 OK, does anyone have a call for a vote on the board? 00:38:45.280 --> 00:38:55.560 Motion passes five, zero. 00:38:55.560 --> 00:38:59.120 That concludes our agenda items for individual consideration. 00:38:59.120 --> 00:39:02.880 Move on down to agenda item number four, our public hearings. 00:39:02.880 --> 00:39:07.440 Starting off with 4A will be Z24-0003, 00:39:07.440 --> 00:39:10.040 presented by Bryce van Ardeel. 00:39:10.040 --> 00:39:11.840 And I'll go ahead and open the public hearing 00:39:11.840 --> 00:39:13.620 for us to begin. 00:39:13.620 --> 00:39:14.580 Good evening, Commission. 00:39:14.580 --> 00:39:15.560 Long time no see. 00:39:15.560 --> 00:39:17.320 Bryce van Ardeel, assistant planner. 00:39:17.320 --> 00:39:21.520 This is Z24-0003. 00:39:21.520 --> 00:39:25.160 So this is a 1.52 acre property on the east side 00:39:25.160 --> 00:39:28.320 of Fort Worth Drive and on the north side of Hobson Lane. 00:39:28.320 --> 00:39:31.080 We are proposing-- the rezone request 00:39:31.080 --> 00:39:34.400 is for the properties moved from suburban corridor 00:39:34.400 --> 00:39:36.240 to residential six. 00:39:36.240 --> 00:39:39.160 The intent is to match the adjacent property 00:39:39.160 --> 00:39:41.800 to the north and the east, which is also residential six, 00:39:41.800 --> 00:39:45.120 under the same ownership. 00:39:45.120 --> 00:39:47.600 The Denton Comprehensive Plan and Future Land Use Map 00:39:47.600 --> 00:39:50.240 designates this area as low residential and community 00:39:50.240 --> 00:39:51.560 mixed use. 00:39:51.560 --> 00:39:53.280 The low residential, typically, we 00:39:53.280 --> 00:39:56.640 accommodate for single family detached dwellings, 00:39:56.640 --> 00:39:59.240 as well as related uses that may support 00:39:59.240 --> 00:40:01.200 a residential neighborhood. 00:40:01.200 --> 00:40:02.860 The community mixed use designation 00:40:02.860 --> 00:40:05.440 does apply to existing as well as future commercial 00:40:05.440 --> 00:40:07.060 developments within the city, in which 00:40:07.060 --> 00:40:10.800 we want to encourage a diverse and attractive array of uses. 00:40:12.800 --> 00:40:14.600 The criteria for approval-- this proposal 00:40:14.600 --> 00:40:18.800 is consistent with the Denton 2040 Comprehensive Plan, 00:40:18.800 --> 00:40:23.920 the Denton Development Code, as well as the R6 Zoning District 00:40:23.920 --> 00:40:25.200 Purpose Statement. 00:40:25.200 --> 00:40:27.000 In addition, this zoning change is not 00:40:27.000 --> 00:40:30.320 expected to bring any adverse impacts 00:40:30.320 --> 00:40:33.520 to the city or the area. 00:40:33.520 --> 00:40:35.400 A notification was posted in the Denton Record 00:40:35.400 --> 00:40:37.560 Chronicle on April 7th of this year. 00:40:37.560 --> 00:40:41.360 The city website posted a notice on April 4th, 00:40:41.360 --> 00:40:44.680 and there was a sign posted on the property on April 5th. 00:40:44.680 --> 00:40:47.120 We mailed a total of 27 notices out 00:40:47.120 --> 00:40:48.640 to the surrounding property owners 00:40:48.640 --> 00:40:52.080 and received seven responses in favor. 00:40:52.080 --> 00:40:54.160 I do want to make a note that your backup had 00:40:54.160 --> 00:40:57.240 the in favor listed as two, that we've obviously 00:40:57.240 --> 00:40:59.280 received a couple since then. 00:40:59.280 --> 00:41:01.480 The applicant did not conduct a neighborhood meeting, 00:41:01.480 --> 00:41:04.840 but did reach out to property owners individually. 00:41:04.840 --> 00:41:06.440 Staff recommends approval of this 00:41:06.440 --> 00:41:10.320 as this meets all of the set out criteria within the DDC. 00:41:10.320 --> 00:41:12.200 And I'm here for any questions. 00:41:12.200 --> 00:41:14.120 I do believe that the applicant is here as well, 00:41:14.120 --> 00:41:16.360 and he has a small presentation he'd like to give. 00:41:16.360 --> 00:41:18.080 - Thank you, Bryce. 00:41:18.080 --> 00:41:20.840 I want to throw it to Tina first, real quick, 00:41:20.840 --> 00:41:23.200 to give clarification from an item that was 00:41:23.200 --> 00:41:24.640 brought up during work session. 00:41:24.640 --> 00:41:26.400 - Great job, Bryce. 00:41:26.400 --> 00:41:29.440 So one of the things I wanted to correct with our discussion 00:41:29.440 --> 00:41:31.760 from work session is Haley brought to my attention. 00:41:31.760 --> 00:41:33.720 So for the single-family residential development, 00:41:33.720 --> 00:41:36.240 they do have a responsibility for meeting the 10-point 00:41:36.240 --> 00:41:38.280 screening buffering requirement that 00:41:38.280 --> 00:41:41.120 would be adjacent to the commercial development. 00:41:41.120 --> 00:41:42.520 As we talked about in work session, 00:41:42.520 --> 00:41:44.600 being that we already have a zoning compliance plan 00:41:44.600 --> 00:41:48.360 for the self-storage use that is immediately to the west, 00:41:48.360 --> 00:41:50.840 because of when that plan was approved, 00:41:50.840 --> 00:41:52.560 they are not having to meet certain screening 00:41:52.560 --> 00:41:53.480 and buffering requirements. 00:41:53.480 --> 00:41:55.600 I believe it would be 50 points for their use right now 00:41:55.600 --> 00:41:58.480 because of the resident or because of this property 00:41:58.480 --> 00:41:59.920 being rezoned or residential. 00:41:59.920 --> 00:42:01.240 Now, of course, if that development 00:42:01.240 --> 00:42:04.000 does not come to fruition and a new plan is submitted 00:42:04.000 --> 00:42:06.520 for a new development application for that site, 00:42:06.520 --> 00:42:08.880 then we would apply the appropriate screening 00:42:08.880 --> 00:42:10.200 and buffering point requirements that 00:42:10.200 --> 00:42:11.560 are necessary at that time. 00:42:11.560 --> 00:42:13.360 - Got it. 00:42:13.360 --> 00:42:14.760 Thank you, Tina, I appreciate it. 00:42:14.760 --> 00:42:16.200 Any questions for city staff? 00:42:16.200 --> 00:42:20.320 Okay, I don't see any. 00:42:20.320 --> 00:42:21.160 This is a public hearing. 00:42:21.160 --> 00:42:23.360 We do have the applicant who wants to present and speak, 00:42:23.360 --> 00:42:25.200 and that would be Thomas Fletcher. 00:42:25.200 --> 00:42:27.280 Come on down and give your name, address, 00:42:27.280 --> 00:42:28.720 and then your time will begin. 00:42:36.120 --> 00:42:37.240 - Good evening, commissioners. 00:42:37.240 --> 00:42:38.840 Thomas Fletcher with Kimley-Horn. 00:42:38.840 --> 00:42:40.800 I'm the consultant for the applicant. 00:42:40.800 --> 00:42:44.040 6160 Warren Parkway, Frisco, Texas. 00:42:44.040 --> 00:42:47.280 Appreciate the opportunity to present to you tonight. 00:42:47.280 --> 00:42:50.160 Appreciate the staff presentation as well, 00:42:50.160 --> 00:42:51.960 kind of going through the project. 00:42:51.960 --> 00:42:53.280 I will keep this brief. 00:42:53.280 --> 00:42:56.440 The project is located along Hobson Lane 00:42:56.440 --> 00:42:59.800 in the northeast corner of US 377, 00:42:59.800 --> 00:43:02.840 Country Club Road and Hobson Lane. 00:43:03.920 --> 00:43:07.800 We're showing there the request for 1.5 acres 00:43:07.800 --> 00:43:10.640 for the zoning boundary goes to the center line of the road. 00:43:10.640 --> 00:43:13.720 The actual property is just over 1.3 acres. 00:43:13.720 --> 00:43:15.440 So when looking at the development 00:43:15.440 --> 00:43:17.720 and kind of what the uses might be 00:43:17.720 --> 00:43:21.280 and how they could affect the traffic and surrounding uses, 00:43:21.280 --> 00:43:24.560 we really were kind of looking at what could be developed 00:43:24.560 --> 00:43:28.440 in the 1.3 area of the property. 00:43:28.440 --> 00:43:33.360 The surrounding zoning is R6 to the north and to the east, 00:43:33.360 --> 00:43:37.120 R2 to the south and SC around to the west 00:43:37.120 --> 00:43:38.680 and somewhat to the north. 00:43:38.680 --> 00:43:40.960 We've already kind of gone through 00:43:40.960 --> 00:43:43.720 and Bryce covered the future land use plan. 00:43:43.720 --> 00:43:45.720 But really what I wanted to kind of hit on 00:43:45.720 --> 00:43:48.120 is under SC suburban corridor, 00:43:48.120 --> 00:43:50.440 what could be developed under this property 00:43:50.440 --> 00:43:52.120 with its current zoning. 00:43:52.120 --> 00:43:53.800 Food and beverage service, 00:43:53.800 --> 00:43:55.800 which includes restaurant drive-through, 00:43:55.800 --> 00:43:57.600 bar, tavern or lounge, 00:43:57.600 --> 00:44:00.560 office, business, professional services, 00:44:00.560 --> 00:44:02.720 retail sales, lodging facilities. 00:44:02.720 --> 00:44:04.520 So with lodging facilities, 00:44:04.520 --> 00:44:06.880 because it's only a 1.3 acre tract, 00:44:06.880 --> 00:44:08.440 we really didn't even look at that use 00:44:08.440 --> 00:44:11.160 because it would not be feasible to develop there. 00:44:11.160 --> 00:44:13.680 But when we looked at the 1.3 acres 00:44:13.680 --> 00:44:16.880 and what we could develop, 00:44:16.880 --> 00:44:18.280 what we did is we went through 00:44:18.280 --> 00:44:22.480 and looked at the ITE transportation uses 00:44:22.480 --> 00:44:25.840 for each of those uses to determine approximately 00:44:25.840 --> 00:44:29.320 what would be the average daily trips for each use. 00:44:29.320 --> 00:44:30.760 So a sit-down restaurant, 00:44:30.760 --> 00:44:33.920 you're looking at close to 1,300 trips per day. 00:44:33.920 --> 00:44:36.000 A drive-through fast food restaurant, 00:44:36.000 --> 00:44:38.520 just under 2,000 trips per day. 00:44:38.520 --> 00:44:43.200 The small office building would be about 260 trips per day. 00:44:43.200 --> 00:44:45.560 The strip retail plaza would be 00:44:45.560 --> 00:44:47.880 just under 1,000 uses per day. 00:44:47.880 --> 00:44:50.640 But with the residential zoning, the R6, 00:44:50.640 --> 00:44:52.160 it would be down zoning. 00:44:52.160 --> 00:44:54.840 So you're looking at just about 50 trips per day. 00:44:54.840 --> 00:44:59.840 So you can see even the lowest use for the SC 00:45:00.040 --> 00:45:03.120 has about five times the traffic generation 00:45:03.120 --> 00:45:06.440 as what the residential development would produce. 00:45:06.440 --> 00:45:08.720 And depending on how that developed out, 00:45:08.720 --> 00:45:09.960 if it developed as SC, 00:45:09.960 --> 00:45:11.880 it could be significantly greater than that. 00:45:11.880 --> 00:45:15.080 So I did wanna point out that it is, 00:45:15.080 --> 00:45:17.080 the request would be down zoning 00:45:17.080 --> 00:45:21.800 and reduce the traffic on the transportation system. 00:45:21.800 --> 00:45:23.760 And really, that's really the main thing 00:45:23.760 --> 00:45:25.600 I wanted to highlight in the presentation. 00:45:25.600 --> 00:45:28.000 And the owner is here with me as well, 00:45:28.000 --> 00:45:30.560 and I'm happy to stand for any questions. 00:45:30.560 --> 00:45:33.000 And he is here for questions as well. 00:45:33.000 --> 00:45:33.840 Thank you. 00:45:33.840 --> 00:45:36.920 - Thank you, Mr. Fletcher. 00:45:36.920 --> 00:45:38.520 Any questions for the applicant? 00:45:38.520 --> 00:45:40.960 Okay. 00:45:40.960 --> 00:45:46.080 I think the one question I had for you as the engineer, 00:45:46.080 --> 00:45:47.520 applicant and consultant, 00:45:47.520 --> 00:45:49.400 is just concerns that are brought up 00:45:49.400 --> 00:45:51.160 by the neighborhood down the way, 00:45:51.160 --> 00:45:52.080 down there at Forest Ridge. 00:45:52.080 --> 00:45:54.200 I know they were concerned quite a bit 00:45:54.200 --> 00:45:56.880 just about tracked housing and that kind of stuff 00:45:56.880 --> 00:45:58.000 being possibly coming in there. 00:45:58.000 --> 00:46:01.160 I know we're talking about the 1.3 acres 00:46:01.160 --> 00:46:03.200 for the zoning within here 00:46:03.200 --> 00:46:06.160 as a greater part of the total of, I think, 18 acres 00:46:06.160 --> 00:46:09.720 that would be eventually platted altogether within that. 00:46:09.720 --> 00:46:14.280 So any insight you think for moving down, 00:46:14.280 --> 00:46:17.240 moving down zoning down to an R6 type of product 00:46:17.240 --> 00:46:20.440 that you guys would be, the owner would be pursuing? 00:46:20.440 --> 00:46:21.960 - Yeah, absolutely, thanks, Dave. 00:46:21.960 --> 00:46:24.400 - Kind of product that they're trying to approach 00:46:24.400 --> 00:46:26.040 to come on there with the zoning changes. 00:46:26.040 --> 00:46:27.920 So if you can just state your name and address 00:46:27.920 --> 00:46:29.000 and then we'll come to taste it. 00:46:29.000 --> 00:46:30.400 - Yes, I'm Dick Smith. 00:46:30.400 --> 00:46:32.200 I live at 721 West Hobson, 00:46:32.200 --> 00:46:35.580 which is directly across the street from this project. 00:46:35.580 --> 00:46:39.560 We've lived there for 24 years 00:46:39.560 --> 00:46:42.520 and I've been a partner in owning this property 00:46:42.520 --> 00:46:47.000 for nearly all that time, at least 20 years. 00:46:47.000 --> 00:46:50.600 We've had numerous opportunity to develop that property 00:46:50.600 --> 00:46:52.160 over those years. 00:46:52.160 --> 00:46:55.040 And because I live across the street from it, 00:46:55.040 --> 00:46:58.160 I'm very particular as what would go in there. 00:46:58.160 --> 00:47:03.160 And we've had numerous builders for a subdivision. 00:47:03.160 --> 00:47:09.760 We will not let track housing go in there. 00:47:09.760 --> 00:47:12.520 I can assure you of that. 00:47:12.520 --> 00:47:15.200 - Okay, thank you, Mr. Smith, appreciate it. 00:47:15.200 --> 00:47:16.040 - Yeah, thank you. 00:47:16.040 --> 00:47:19.960 - I don't see any other questions for the applicant. 00:47:19.960 --> 00:47:21.200 This is a public hearing. 00:47:21.200 --> 00:47:24.020 I do not have any other cards wishing to speak, 00:47:24.020 --> 00:47:26.800 but anybody who would like to may do so 00:47:26.800 --> 00:47:28.340 and you can fill out a card later. 00:47:28.340 --> 00:47:32.520 Okay, seeing none, I'll close our public hearing 00:47:32.520 --> 00:47:36.120 and move to the dais for discussion, motion. 00:47:36.120 --> 00:47:37.320 Commissioner Villarreal. 00:47:37.320 --> 00:47:40.880 - Move approval of the requested zoning change. 00:47:40.880 --> 00:47:41.880 - Okay, Commissioner Cole. 00:47:41.880 --> 00:47:43.060 - Second. 00:47:43.060 --> 00:47:45.000 - The first and a second discussion. 00:47:45.000 --> 00:47:46.000 Commissioner Pruitt. 00:47:46.000 --> 00:47:48.040 - Thank you, Chair. 00:47:48.040 --> 00:47:50.400 Yeah, I mean, I think we all know 00:47:50.400 --> 00:47:54.280 we're talking about just the 1.34, something. 00:47:54.280 --> 00:47:55.120 - Something like that. 00:47:55.120 --> 00:47:56.920 - Something less than two acres. 00:47:56.920 --> 00:48:00.560 You know, I think this gives the applicant 00:48:00.560 --> 00:48:05.480 greater flexibility to place the two drives, 00:48:05.480 --> 00:48:08.000 hopefully, along Hobson where it makes sense. 00:48:08.000 --> 00:48:14.520 I will say that I think this particular area of our town, 00:48:14.520 --> 00:48:19.080 if we don't do something quickly, 00:48:19.080 --> 00:48:23.280 it's going to end up as seven different subdivisions 00:48:23.280 --> 00:48:27.440 with 18 cul-de-sacs within the next five years, 00:48:27.440 --> 00:48:29.800 maybe 15 years, I don't know what the timeline is. 00:48:29.800 --> 00:48:31.480 I'm bad at guessing that. 00:48:31.480 --> 00:48:34.400 And I don't think that's what our comp plan calls for. 00:48:34.400 --> 00:48:38.400 But at the same time, this is a zoning request. 00:48:38.400 --> 00:48:42.920 So I'm just pointing out that we have other issues 00:48:42.920 --> 00:48:45.200 that we need to fix independent of this. 00:48:45.200 --> 00:48:46.320 So thank you. 00:48:46.320 --> 00:48:47.160 - That's great. 00:48:48.400 --> 00:48:49.680 Any other comments? 00:48:49.680 --> 00:48:52.840 I'll throw in some myself. 00:48:52.840 --> 00:48:56.880 So being a resident just down the road on Hobson there, 00:48:56.880 --> 00:48:59.840 this is the kind of development that we want to see. 00:48:59.840 --> 00:49:03.960 I believe in my opinion, just of, you know, 00:49:03.960 --> 00:49:08.240 having more of the residential zoning in that area, 00:49:08.240 --> 00:49:10.560 it's phenomenal infill 00:49:10.560 --> 00:49:12.360 and already heavily residential area, 00:49:12.360 --> 00:49:13.720 super close to green space, 00:49:13.720 --> 00:49:16.440 that residential makes sense here in the first place. 00:49:16.440 --> 00:49:19.400 The fact that it's even SC doesn't really make sense. 00:49:19.400 --> 00:49:22.240 It wouldn't be what I think most of the folks in the area 00:49:22.240 --> 00:49:24.240 would kind of describe as the character of that area. 00:49:24.240 --> 00:49:27.240 So with that, I think it's a great project. 00:49:27.240 --> 00:49:29.840 So if there's no other comments, 00:49:29.840 --> 00:49:32.720 then we'll go ahead and move to the board for a vote. 00:49:32.720 --> 00:49:45.640 That motion passes five, zero. 00:49:45.640 --> 00:49:50.200 Okay, good luck with your project on that as well. 00:49:50.200 --> 00:49:54.880 All right, moving on to 4B, S24-0001 00:49:54.880 --> 00:49:57.480 with Ashley Exit to present. 00:49:57.480 --> 00:50:00.280 - Good evening, Ashley Exit, assistant planner. 00:50:00.280 --> 00:50:03.520 - And I will open up the public hearing. 00:50:03.520 --> 00:50:09.200 - This is S241, RDO equipment. 00:50:09.200 --> 00:50:12.480 This is a request for a specific use permit 00:50:12.480 --> 00:50:14.600 to allow an equipment sales and rental use. 00:50:14.600 --> 00:50:16.320 Equipment sales and rental does require 00:50:16.320 --> 00:50:19.040 a specific use permit in light industrial zoning. 00:50:19.040 --> 00:50:20.360 This may look familiar to you. 00:50:20.360 --> 00:50:23.880 This was before you as a zoning change request in February. 00:50:23.880 --> 00:50:25.840 This use will also include accessory uses 00:50:25.840 --> 00:50:28.280 such as retail, sales office, product displays, 00:50:28.280 --> 00:50:29.840 and equipment servicing. 00:50:29.840 --> 00:50:32.480 This subject site is approximately 10 acres of land, 00:50:32.480 --> 00:50:36.200 generally located south of US 380, west of Mosh Branch Road. 00:50:36.200 --> 00:50:39.880 This is the proposed site plan. 00:50:39.880 --> 00:50:42.360 They are proposing a 28,000 square foot building. 00:50:42.360 --> 00:50:45.080 It is outlined on this plan in blue. 00:50:45.080 --> 00:50:47.760 13,000 square feet will include the retail showroom, 00:50:47.760 --> 00:50:50.440 product displays, parts counter, and sales offices. 00:50:50.440 --> 00:50:52.760 And 15,000 square foot will include the accessory, 00:50:52.760 --> 00:50:55.560 warehousing, and service at the rear of the building. 00:50:55.560 --> 00:50:57.320 There's also a vehicle parking area, 00:50:57.320 --> 00:51:00.000 which is to the front and side of the building. 00:51:00.000 --> 00:51:02.720 There'll be an equipment display area along the right of way 00:51:02.720 --> 00:51:05.080 that is circled on this plan in red, 00:51:05.080 --> 00:51:06.640 and an equipment storage area, 00:51:06.640 --> 00:51:08.480 which is circled on the plan in green 00:51:08.480 --> 00:51:09.960 to the side and the rear. 00:51:09.960 --> 00:51:12.760 That will be screened by a six foot wood fence. 00:51:12.760 --> 00:51:15.600 And there will also be 35 vehicular parking spaces. 00:51:15.600 --> 00:51:18.400 The proposed landscape plan, 00:51:18.400 --> 00:51:21.160 they're proposing 22% landscape area 00:51:21.160 --> 00:51:23.360 and 20% tree canopy cover. 00:51:23.360 --> 00:51:25.560 They did request an alternative landscape plan 00:51:25.560 --> 00:51:27.720 due to the easements that you see outlined here 00:51:27.720 --> 00:51:29.320 on the plan in red. 00:51:29.320 --> 00:51:31.040 They do encumber a large portion 00:51:31.040 --> 00:51:33.200 of the western property of their site. 00:51:33.200 --> 00:51:35.400 They are also along a text dot roadway, 00:51:35.400 --> 00:51:38.040 which does not allow street trees in the right of way. 00:51:39.280 --> 00:51:41.440 So they did request to relocate the street trees, 00:51:41.440 --> 00:51:44.480 and those are outlined on this plan in blue. 00:51:44.480 --> 00:51:47.400 And then they also required a landscape buffer 00:51:47.400 --> 00:51:50.240 between this commercial use and the adjacent industrial use, 00:51:50.240 --> 00:51:51.640 which is a gas well. 00:51:51.640 --> 00:51:52.480 Due to the easements, 00:51:52.480 --> 00:51:53.840 they could not place the buffer 00:51:53.840 --> 00:51:55.080 on that portion of their site. 00:51:55.080 --> 00:51:56.440 So that has been relocated 00:51:56.440 --> 00:51:58.600 to the eastern portion of their site, 00:51:58.600 --> 00:52:00.760 and they've also provided additional landscaping 00:52:00.760 --> 00:52:02.800 in the parking area and the entrance. 00:52:02.800 --> 00:52:07.280 This request does meet the criteria for approval 00:52:07.280 --> 00:52:08.600 of the Denton Development Code. 00:52:08.600 --> 00:52:10.880 It's consistent with the 2040 comprehensive plan 00:52:10.880 --> 00:52:12.080 and the future land use map, 00:52:12.080 --> 00:52:14.640 as well as the LI zoning district purpose statement. 00:52:14.640 --> 00:52:16.480 And we do not expect significant adverse 00:52:16.480 --> 00:52:19.200 financial infrastructure impacts from this project. 00:52:19.200 --> 00:52:22.360 We did do public outreach. 00:52:22.360 --> 00:52:23.840 An ad was posted in the newspaper, 00:52:23.840 --> 00:52:25.600 a sign was posted on the property. 00:52:25.600 --> 00:52:28.200 We've mailed notices to everyone within 500 feet, 00:52:28.200 --> 00:52:30.120 and we did not receive any responses 00:52:30.120 --> 00:52:31.800 in opposition or in favor. 00:52:31.800 --> 00:52:35.240 Staff does recommend approval of the SUP 00:52:35.240 --> 00:52:36.800 with the following conditions. 00:52:36.800 --> 00:52:39.560 Many of these conditions are typical SUP conditions, 00:52:39.560 --> 00:52:41.720 and these are the same conditions that were in your backup, 00:52:41.720 --> 00:52:43.520 so I won't read all of these to you. 00:52:43.520 --> 00:52:45.040 I will go through some of the conditions 00:52:45.040 --> 00:52:46.840 that are specific to this site. 00:52:46.840 --> 00:52:48.880 They will need to obtain an encroachment agreement 00:52:48.880 --> 00:52:50.680 for the encroachments into those easements 00:52:50.680 --> 00:52:52.160 along the west property line 00:52:52.160 --> 00:52:54.600 before approval of their civil engineering plans. 00:52:54.600 --> 00:52:57.720 The improvements in the TxDOT roadway 00:52:57.720 --> 00:52:59.920 will also require approval by TxDOT. 00:52:59.920 --> 00:53:03.080 So any minor alterations required by TxDOT 00:53:03.080 --> 00:53:05.160 to the proposed driveway along 380 00:53:05.160 --> 00:53:07.600 or to relocate the parking spaces 00:53:07.600 --> 00:53:10.120 impacted by any driveway relocation 00:53:10.120 --> 00:53:12.320 or modifying the median opening and turn lanes 00:53:12.320 --> 00:53:14.080 can be approved by city staff. 00:53:14.080 --> 00:53:15.800 Any other changes to the site access 00:53:15.800 --> 00:53:17.480 would require a SUP amendment. 00:53:17.480 --> 00:53:20.400 Lastly, construction of the pavement 00:53:20.400 --> 00:53:22.520 within the cross-access easement is required 00:53:22.520 --> 00:53:24.960 when the adjacent property to the east develops. 00:53:24.960 --> 00:53:27.920 Happy to answer any questions, 00:53:27.920 --> 00:53:30.920 and the applicant is also here with the presentation. 00:53:30.920 --> 00:53:32.200 - Thank you, Ashley. 00:53:32.200 --> 00:53:35.960 I don't see anything at this time, so appreciate it. 00:53:35.960 --> 00:53:38.240 Applicant did put in a card to speak, 00:53:38.240 --> 00:53:40.560 so I'll go ahead and invite Amy Bissett up 00:53:40.560 --> 00:53:42.560 to give us a presentation. 00:53:42.560 --> 00:53:44.600 Just name and address and then your time will start. 00:53:44.600 --> 00:53:45.600 - Good evening, commissioners. 00:53:45.600 --> 00:53:49.600 Amy Bissett, 109 North Elm, Denton 76201. 00:53:49.600 --> 00:53:51.160 I have a few slides, 00:53:51.160 --> 00:53:55.640 but I don't necessarily think that we need to present them. 00:53:55.640 --> 00:53:58.960 It would be kind of a repeat of what Ashley outlined, 00:53:58.960 --> 00:54:00.840 unless you have specific questions. 00:54:00.840 --> 00:54:03.400 I do want to point out that I have Chris Schmitz here 00:54:03.400 --> 00:54:06.160 with RDO, and I have Mac Mackey here 00:54:06.160 --> 00:54:07.520 with Kim Lee Horne, our engineer, 00:54:07.520 --> 00:54:09.680 in case you have any questions for either of them. 00:54:09.680 --> 00:54:12.800 And Chris, do you want to come up and say anything, or? 00:54:12.800 --> 00:54:14.320 Okay, he says hi. 00:54:14.320 --> 00:54:15.160 - Hi. 00:54:15.160 --> 00:54:19.440 Do we have any questions for the applicant or engineer? 00:54:19.440 --> 00:54:21.080 Okay, I'll see you, Amy. 00:54:21.080 --> 00:54:23.120 Thank you, appreciate it. 00:54:23.120 --> 00:54:24.040 This is a public hearing. 00:54:24.040 --> 00:54:26.360 I don't have any other cards wishing to speak, 00:54:26.360 --> 00:54:30.180 but you do have the right to do so. 00:54:30.180 --> 00:54:32.720 Okay, seeing none, I'll go ahead and close public hearing. 00:54:32.720 --> 00:54:36.520 Move to the dais for a motion or discussion. 00:54:36.520 --> 00:54:38.000 Commissioner Pruitt. 00:54:38.000 --> 00:54:40.920 - I'll move approval and just want to thank the applicant 00:54:40.920 --> 00:54:42.760 and the engineering efforts 00:54:42.760 --> 00:54:46.440 to try to keep the street trees within 50 feet of the street, 00:54:46.440 --> 00:54:49.800 even though TechStop prefers wayward cars 00:54:49.800 --> 00:54:52.600 to smash through sidewalks before it gets to the trees. 00:54:52.600 --> 00:54:54.180 Thank you. 00:54:54.180 --> 00:54:55.020 - Commissioner Cole. 00:54:55.020 --> 00:54:55.860 - Second. 00:54:55.860 --> 00:55:00.160 - The first and a second, and some good jokes in between. 00:55:00.160 --> 00:55:01.760 Any other discussion? 00:55:01.760 --> 00:55:05.560 Okay, let's go ahead and take a vote to the board. 00:55:05.560 --> 00:55:15.540 That motion passes five, zero. 00:55:15.540 --> 00:55:18.960 Okay, moving on to item number five, 00:55:18.960 --> 00:55:20.880 planning a zoning commission project matrix. 00:55:20.880 --> 00:55:23.120 So Ms. Tina Fergens, take it away. 00:55:23.120 --> 00:55:24.200 - Thank you, Chair. 00:55:24.200 --> 00:55:26.520 So several items to bring to your attention. 00:55:26.520 --> 00:55:29.120 So first of all, in case you missed it, 00:55:29.120 --> 00:55:31.760 Keisha Seriano is in our audience this evening. 00:55:31.760 --> 00:55:34.200 So Keisha is our new assistant planning director 00:55:34.200 --> 00:55:35.840 of our comprehensive planning team. 00:55:35.840 --> 00:55:37.680 So she's gonna be really busy 00:55:37.680 --> 00:55:39.400 once we especially get these area plans done 00:55:39.400 --> 00:55:41.000 and we can start working on implementation 00:55:41.000 --> 00:55:43.400 in addition to helping us with implementation 00:55:43.400 --> 00:55:44.440 of our comprehensive plan. 00:55:44.440 --> 00:55:46.280 So excited to have her join us. 00:55:46.280 --> 00:55:50.860 In terms of updates since the last city council meeting, 00:55:50.860 --> 00:55:52.760 so a couple of items to make note. 00:55:52.760 --> 00:55:54.760 If you recall, Julie had worked on 00:55:54.760 --> 00:55:56.940 a Denton Development Code amendment 00:55:56.940 --> 00:56:00.920 to establish a land occupancy permit requirement. 00:56:00.920 --> 00:56:02.840 So that was approved by council. 00:56:02.840 --> 00:56:06.080 And then also Angie here recently had a rezoning 00:56:06.080 --> 00:56:08.600 of approximately a 1.3 acre track 00:56:08.600 --> 00:56:11.200 that's located over near Bonnie Bray and Riney Road. 00:56:11.200 --> 00:56:13.240 If you recall that property was zoned 00:56:13.240 --> 00:56:15.980 from the public facilities district 00:56:15.980 --> 00:56:18.840 to our R7 zoning district, so that was approved. 00:56:18.840 --> 00:56:21.920 In terms of the matrix itself, 00:56:21.920 --> 00:56:24.600 if you looked at it closely, 00:56:24.600 --> 00:56:26.920 you will see that I programmed some dates in here 00:56:26.920 --> 00:56:28.000 with Haley's assistance. 00:56:28.000 --> 00:56:30.920 So we added a couple of things. 00:56:30.920 --> 00:56:33.320 One is on the discussion related to impacts 00:56:33.320 --> 00:56:35.000 of subdividing the commercial lots 00:56:35.000 --> 00:56:37.400 and the potential for tree preservation loss. 00:56:37.400 --> 00:56:39.600 We are hoping to bring that to you in June. 00:56:39.600 --> 00:56:41.320 So you'll receive that presentation. 00:56:41.320 --> 00:56:43.360 But before that, in May, 00:56:43.360 --> 00:56:45.280 we have planned to bring you a presentation 00:56:45.280 --> 00:56:47.800 related to the requirements for neighborhood amenities 00:56:47.800 --> 00:56:51.360 and particularly the mountain triggers for required parking. 00:56:51.360 --> 00:56:53.480 If you recall, this was a request 00:56:53.480 --> 00:56:54.960 that kind of came about associated with 00:56:54.960 --> 00:56:59.520 the St. Mark's zoning case that we had off of Crawford Road. 00:56:59.520 --> 00:57:01.600 Also, we are proposing to bring forth 00:57:01.600 --> 00:57:03.760 in a work session to you this summer, 00:57:03.760 --> 00:57:06.000 a PNZ reconsideration process. 00:57:06.000 --> 00:57:09.320 Commissioner Villarreal probably recalls this, 00:57:09.320 --> 00:57:12.440 but in particular, we ran into some timing issues 00:57:12.440 --> 00:57:15.760 associated with a request for PNZ reconsideration. 00:57:15.760 --> 00:57:17.400 An item had already been scheduled 00:57:17.400 --> 00:57:20.360 for council's consideration and published on their agenda. 00:57:20.360 --> 00:57:22.480 And our ordinance is silent with respect 00:57:22.480 --> 00:57:24.760 to how the PNZ reconsideration process 00:57:24.760 --> 00:57:25.600 needs to play out. 00:57:25.600 --> 00:57:27.920 We typically follow council's rules and procedure. 00:57:27.920 --> 00:57:30.120 So we're gonna propose to make some ordinance amendments 00:57:30.120 --> 00:57:31.480 to make it a little bit more specific 00:57:31.480 --> 00:57:33.360 and germane to the Planning and Zoning Commission. 00:57:33.360 --> 00:57:36.640 And so we'll bring that to you this summer with that. 00:57:36.640 --> 00:57:39.000 And then the last edit I made to the matrix 00:57:39.000 --> 00:57:42.520 is with respect to our annual comprehensive plan update. 00:57:42.520 --> 00:57:43.360 I think Commissioner Smith, 00:57:43.360 --> 00:57:45.440 this was something that you had requested 00:57:45.440 --> 00:57:48.040 a couple of years ago when we adopted the comp plan. 00:57:48.040 --> 00:57:51.280 And so Julie's anticipating bringing forth 00:57:51.280 --> 00:57:53.160 a presentation to the commission in June 00:57:53.160 --> 00:57:54.920 to provide an update. 00:57:54.920 --> 00:57:57.360 And also with that, we are working 00:57:57.360 --> 00:57:59.760 with our Chief Strategic Officer 00:57:59.760 --> 00:58:01.720 with a software tool that we have 00:58:01.720 --> 00:58:03.520 that allows to basically publish a dashboard 00:58:03.520 --> 00:58:04.880 and for folks to be able to see 00:58:04.880 --> 00:58:06.160 where we are on certain items. 00:58:06.160 --> 00:58:07.680 So that'll be part of that. 00:58:07.680 --> 00:58:09.880 And have to wait on a certain annual update, 00:58:09.880 --> 00:58:12.520 but we'll continue to have that information made available. 00:58:12.520 --> 00:58:14.520 But we'll bring that to you this summer. 00:58:14.520 --> 00:58:18.120 Couple of events to make note of. 00:58:18.120 --> 00:58:21.000 So our design downtown debt and plan, 00:58:21.000 --> 00:58:22.960 we have our feedback finale event 00:58:22.960 --> 00:58:26.200 that is planned for May 9th at 5.30. 00:58:26.200 --> 00:58:29.120 This will be at the Greater Denton Arts Council 00:58:29.120 --> 00:58:31.520 at the Patterson Appleton Center. 00:58:31.520 --> 00:58:34.720 Which I got, GDAC at the pack is how I was told. 00:58:34.720 --> 00:58:37.680 So anyway, so we have that event coming up 00:58:37.680 --> 00:58:40.080 that will really focus on interested 00:58:40.080 --> 00:58:41.480 in receiving the community's feedback. 00:58:41.480 --> 00:58:44.040 You all are welcome to attend as well. 00:58:44.040 --> 00:58:47.160 But in particular, as it relates to investments 00:58:47.160 --> 00:58:49.020 that the city can make in downtown, 00:58:49.020 --> 00:58:52.080 requesting the community's assistance 00:58:52.080 --> 00:58:54.880 with helping us prioritize where they think 00:58:54.880 --> 00:58:57.600 that the city should focus its efforts on 00:58:57.600 --> 00:59:00.160 as it relates to that particular area plan project. 00:59:00.160 --> 00:59:02.500 Last week on Wednesday, 00:59:02.500 --> 00:59:05.600 we had the Quaker Town design blitz event. 00:59:05.600 --> 00:59:08.760 And so the feedback that we received at that event, 00:59:08.760 --> 00:59:11.280 we will use that on further developing the concept plans 00:59:11.280 --> 00:59:12.300 for Quaker Town Park, 00:59:12.300 --> 00:59:14.720 which are also part of this design downtown debt and plan. 00:59:14.720 --> 00:59:17.560 So we appreciate the folks that participated 00:59:17.560 --> 00:59:20.600 in that particular engagement event we had. 00:59:20.600 --> 00:59:22.640 As it relates to Southeast, 00:59:22.640 --> 00:59:24.200 I know it's been a little quiet on that front 00:59:24.200 --> 00:59:26.760 since we had our last update meeting. 00:59:26.760 --> 00:59:29.640 We are working on the implementation action items right now, 00:59:29.640 --> 00:59:31.400 especially with our consultant team. 00:59:31.400 --> 00:59:33.680 And so we anticipate probably mid-June, 00:59:33.680 --> 00:59:35.000 we will come into you 00:59:35.000 --> 00:59:36.640 with a work session discussion on that. 00:59:36.640 --> 00:59:38.520 And I know that was something that the commission 00:59:38.520 --> 00:59:41.680 had requested when we did our joint meeting 00:59:41.680 --> 00:59:42.720 with council on that. 00:59:42.720 --> 00:59:46.800 And then let's see, short-term rentals. 00:59:46.800 --> 00:59:50.520 So we continue to be kind of in a holding pattern 00:59:50.520 --> 00:59:52.560 on that since the Planning and Zoning Commission 00:59:52.560 --> 00:59:54.400 recommended approval of the ordinance. 00:59:54.400 --> 00:59:56.360 That is actually slated for June 7th, 00:59:56.360 --> 00:59:57.960 city council consideration. 00:59:57.960 --> 01:00:01.720 So during this time, we have a town hall meeting 01:00:01.720 --> 01:00:03.960 that we will be doing to help educate the community 01:00:03.960 --> 01:00:06.880 about the requirements that are included 01:00:06.880 --> 01:00:08.600 within our proposed ordinance amendment 01:00:08.600 --> 01:00:10.360 that we'll be taking to council. 01:00:10.360 --> 01:00:12.240 I think there's a little bit of confusion by some 01:00:12.240 --> 01:00:13.800 that with a thousand permit cap 01:00:13.800 --> 01:00:16.360 that we're actually inviting a thousand short-term rentals 01:00:16.360 --> 01:00:18.320 to come into our community and that is not the case. 01:00:18.320 --> 01:00:20.160 We have no limitations on them right now 01:00:20.160 --> 01:00:21.640 in terms of the number that can operate 01:00:21.640 --> 01:00:23.240 as you're well aware of. 01:00:23.240 --> 01:00:26.680 So wanting to do a town hall, we'll do that on May 23rd. 01:00:26.680 --> 01:00:29.600 But really our plan is to try and help address 01:00:29.600 --> 01:00:32.640 any questions that the community may have on that front. 01:00:32.640 --> 01:00:36.160 And lastly, Cameron asked that I bring to your attention. 01:00:36.160 --> 01:00:38.760 So we have our Denton revealed series of events 01:00:38.760 --> 01:00:39.720 during the month of May 01:00:39.720 --> 01:00:41.640 to highlight historic preservation month. 01:00:41.640 --> 01:00:44.400 So you can find out more information on our website. 01:00:44.400 --> 01:00:47.320 I know if you follow Preserve Denton on Instagram, 01:00:47.320 --> 01:00:48.800 Cameron, it makes regular posts, 01:00:48.800 --> 01:00:50.760 especially regarding the various events 01:00:50.760 --> 01:00:53.120 that are planned throughout the month of May. 01:00:53.120 --> 01:00:55.280 And we do this in tandem with Denton County as well. 01:00:55.280 --> 01:00:57.800 So if your time schedule permits, 01:00:57.800 --> 01:00:59.480 I know we'd welcome having your attendance 01:00:59.480 --> 01:01:00.840 at some of those events. 01:01:00.840 --> 01:01:02.680 And with that, that concludes my remarks. 01:01:02.680 --> 01:01:03.520 Thank you. 01:01:03.520 --> 01:01:04.360 - Thank you, Tina. 01:01:04.360 --> 01:01:07.520 Any items to add to the matrix at this time? 01:01:07.520 --> 01:01:10.800 Okay. 01:01:10.800 --> 01:01:12.680 Seeing no, move on to item number six, 01:01:12.680 --> 01:01:14.560 concluding items, any concluding items, 01:01:14.560 --> 01:01:16.040 anything they want to add in there? 01:01:16.040 --> 01:01:17.160 Commissioner Villarreal. 01:01:17.160 --> 01:01:18.720 - Just wanna let folks know early voting 01:01:18.720 --> 01:01:19.600 is happening now. 01:01:19.600 --> 01:01:23.560 You can vote tomorrow through next Tuesday, the 30th, 01:01:23.560 --> 01:01:24.640 anywhere in Denton County. 01:01:24.640 --> 01:01:26.800 And then election day is May 4th, 01:01:26.800 --> 01:01:28.960 which is a week from Saturday. 01:01:28.960 --> 01:01:29.800 - Great. 01:01:29.800 --> 01:01:31.880 Thank you very much for the PSA. 01:01:31.880 --> 01:01:33.280 Any other concluding items? 01:01:33.280 --> 01:01:37.600 All right, seeing none, I will adjourn our meeting at 7.03. 01:01:37.600 --> 01:01:38.960 Everyone have a great night.