1 00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:07,220 Okay, it is nine o'clock and we have a quorum, so a call to order the Public Utilities Board 2 00:00:07,220 --> 00:00:11,220 for the City of Denton on Monday, January 22nd, 2024. 3 00:00:11,220 --> 00:00:13,820 Kim, did anybody register to speak? 4 00:00:13,820 --> 00:00:14,820 Nope. 5 00:00:14,820 --> 00:00:15,820 All right. 6 00:00:15,820 --> 00:00:17,980 Then we'll go right into the consent agenda. 7 00:00:17,980 --> 00:00:20,940 Does any board member wish to pull an agenda item? 8 00:00:20,940 --> 00:00:21,940 Yes, ma'am. 9 00:00:21,940 --> 00:00:25,700 I would like to pull items A, B, and G. 10 00:00:25,700 --> 00:00:27,020 Okay. 11 00:00:27,020 --> 00:00:28,020 Any others? 12 00:00:28,020 --> 00:00:38,600 All right, so do we have a motion to approve items C, D, and E? 13 00:00:38,600 --> 00:00:39,600 An F. 14 00:00:39,600 --> 00:00:45,780 Okay, Mr. Devin moves and Billy seconds. 15 00:00:45,780 --> 00:00:46,780 All in favor? 16 00:00:46,780 --> 00:00:47,780 Aye. 17 00:00:47,780 --> 00:00:48,780 Carries. 18 00:00:48,780 --> 00:00:49,780 Okay, item A. 19 00:00:49,780 --> 00:01:03,300 Here he comes. 20 00:01:03,300 --> 00:01:11,860 Hi, good morning, members of the board. 21 00:01:11,860 --> 00:01:12,860 My name is Taylor Holt. 22 00:01:12,860 --> 00:01:16,780 I am a project manager for the Capital Projects Department. 23 00:01:16,780 --> 00:01:25,300 This is for the amendment number five to the Elm and Locust Phase Two project. 24 00:01:25,300 --> 00:01:28,980 So the proposed amendment request number five is due to the scope change. 25 00:01:28,980 --> 00:01:33,780 We redefined the scope to include full-depth street reconstruction for the project, including 26 00:01:33,780 --> 00:01:38,380 alternative culvert layouts and additional utility work surrounding the square. 27 00:01:38,380 --> 00:01:44,220 So the scope of the project is going from Elm and Locust from University to Oak, so 28 00:01:44,220 --> 00:01:46,100 north of the square. 29 00:01:46,100 --> 00:01:48,380 So here you show the amendment number five summary. 30 00:01:48,380 --> 00:01:56,660 So we have currently $72,000 remaining on the current contract due to additional services, 31 00:01:56,660 --> 00:02:02,940 and then the total additional work for this scope redefined is $962,000, bringing the 32 00:02:02,940 --> 00:02:09,900 total amendment just over $890,000. 33 00:02:09,900 --> 00:02:14,220 So with this, staff recommends an approval of an amendment to the contract between the 34 00:02:14,220 --> 00:02:20,460 City of Denton and half-associates, and then not to exceed the amount of just over $890,000. 35 00:02:20,460 --> 00:02:24,380 How about that? 36 00:02:24,380 --> 00:02:25,860 I'll have any questions. 37 00:02:25,860 --> 00:02:27,340 Yes, I'm the questioner. 38 00:02:27,340 --> 00:02:29,060 It's my fault you had to do this. 39 00:02:29,060 --> 00:02:30,060 I'm sorry. 40 00:02:30,060 --> 00:02:31,060 No, no. 41 00:02:31,060 --> 00:02:32,060 On a short notice. 42 00:02:32,060 --> 00:02:37,060 The project has been going on since 2018. 43 00:02:37,060 --> 00:02:42,740 So is it like moving slowly from section to section over time, and is this bond money 44 00:02:42,740 --> 00:02:47,500 that was approved before 2018, it all happened before I was on the board. 45 00:02:47,500 --> 00:02:50,380 So I'd like to get some background on this. 46 00:02:50,380 --> 00:02:51,380 Yeah. 47 00:02:51,380 --> 00:02:56,460 So as you mentioned, the project initiation was in 2018. 48 00:02:56,460 --> 00:03:01,900 So the different amendments here are for the additional work that was added to the scope. 49 00:03:01,900 --> 00:03:07,780 So amendment number one was for utility work added for Austin Street. 50 00:03:07,780 --> 00:03:13,000 The amendment number two was for a reduction in billing due to COVID-19. 51 00:03:13,000 --> 00:03:15,860 Amendment number three was for additional design services. 52 00:03:15,860 --> 00:03:21,780 And then amendment number four was for Oakland Street, a drainage study for that. 53 00:03:21,780 --> 00:03:25,700 And so Trevor can speak to a little bit more of the history. 54 00:03:25,700 --> 00:03:26,700 Thank you. 55 00:03:26,700 --> 00:03:27,700 Sure. 56 00:03:27,700 --> 00:03:29,100 Trevor Crane, Director of Capital Projects. 57 00:03:29,100 --> 00:03:31,100 So this is an older project. 58 00:03:31,100 --> 00:03:35,940 I actually started this R. This was one of my projects when I was a project manager when 59 00:03:35,940 --> 00:03:38,220 I got hired on to the City of Denton five years ago. 60 00:03:38,220 --> 00:03:43,580 So this project has evolved a lot since 2018 to where it is now. 61 00:03:43,580 --> 00:03:47,000 We're currently going through the Elm and Locust turn back with Textodd. 62 00:03:47,000 --> 00:03:53,020 So Elm and Locust are both Textodd owned streets currently. 63 00:03:53,020 --> 00:03:58,060 Originally this project was just going to replace the water and wastewater utilities 64 00:03:58,060 --> 00:03:59,220 through Elm and Locust. 65 00:03:59,220 --> 00:04:03,280 So as we've worked through the process of taking those streets back over, we've continually 66 00:04:03,280 --> 00:04:08,260 added scope so that we could do the complete streets that we're doing now. 67 00:04:08,260 --> 00:04:16,460 So you've added sidewalk improvements, drainage, street improvements in addition to the public 68 00:04:16,460 --> 00:04:19,280 utility portion of the water and wastewater. 69 00:04:19,280 --> 00:04:26,620 So we've worked with Textodd to go through the turn back so that we will actually own 70 00:04:26,620 --> 00:04:28,900 the streets after this project's done. 71 00:04:28,900 --> 00:04:31,180 We've added drainage to it as well. 72 00:04:31,180 --> 00:04:35,180 And we've worked with the county in order to be able to include this project as a part 73 00:04:35,180 --> 00:04:42,420 of their county bond in 2022 that got passed, which allowed us to add money to do the full 74 00:04:42,420 --> 00:04:46,420 street reconstruction. 75 00:04:46,420 --> 00:04:51,700 So this is a city project, but it's also using county bond improvement money. 76 00:04:51,700 --> 00:04:52,700 Correct. 77 00:04:52,700 --> 00:04:59,140 Does the street cross across the state or city and county border or lines or does it 78 00:04:59,140 --> 00:05:02,180 connect to county streets or roads or how does that work? 79 00:05:02,180 --> 00:05:03,180 Sure. 80 00:05:03,180 --> 00:05:08,660 So as a part of the county bond election, we were allowed to submit projects that would 81 00:05:08,660 --> 00:05:10,140 be included in that bond. 82 00:05:10,140 --> 00:05:17,120 So this was one of the ones we submitted, Bonnie Bray 4B, Bonnie Bray 5, I believe Westgate 83 00:05:17,120 --> 00:05:21,540 and Ryan Road were also projects that we submitted that were approved in that bond as well. 84 00:05:21,540 --> 00:05:27,060 So you'll see some of those projects coming forward either to PV or council as we move 85 00:05:27,060 --> 00:05:28,500 forward with those projects. 86 00:05:28,500 --> 00:05:29,500 Okay. 87 00:05:29,500 --> 00:05:32,760 So there was a lot more here than met the eye, so I'm really glad I asked you fellas 88 00:05:32,760 --> 00:05:34,260 to come in and talk about it. 89 00:05:34,260 --> 00:05:36,420 This is a project that's long time coming. 90 00:05:36,420 --> 00:05:40,460 So we're excited to be able to get it out there and start construction on it. 91 00:05:40,460 --> 00:05:41,460 Okay. 92 00:05:41,460 --> 00:05:42,460 Well, that's all I have for questions. 93 00:05:42,460 --> 00:05:43,460 Anybody else feel free? 94 00:05:43,460 --> 00:05:44,460 Yes. 95 00:05:44,460 --> 00:05:45,460 Go ahead, Billy. 96 00:05:45,460 --> 00:05:46,460 Okay. 97 00:05:46,460 --> 00:05:51,260 So what I was going to pull this item as well, what I've noticed is you've got over a million 98 00:05:51,260 --> 00:05:58,720 dollars worth of changes, less the existing fee remaining on contract, but of that $952,000 99 00:05:58,720 --> 00:06:06,660 or $62,000, you've got over half, $541,000 in planning, which I'm assuming means engineering 100 00:06:06,660 --> 00:06:13,620 and drawings and investigation and all that. 101 00:06:13,620 --> 00:06:16,820 That's the first part of my question. 102 00:06:16,820 --> 00:06:18,700 So when you mean planning, do you mean? 103 00:06:18,700 --> 00:06:22,700 When you say construction plans, $541,000 some odd dollars. 104 00:06:22,700 --> 00:06:23,700 Yeah. 105 00:06:23,700 --> 00:06:27,420 So that's for the actual design of the water, wastewater improvements, changes, everything 106 00:06:27,420 --> 00:06:31,780 like that, street reconstruction, changing the profiles, everything that goes along. 107 00:06:31,780 --> 00:06:39,180 So over half is engineering, whereas the actual work that's being performed is less than the 108 00:06:39,180 --> 00:06:41,660 engineering that needs to be performed. 109 00:06:41,660 --> 00:06:48,220 I mean, that's kind of, unless you've written something down wrong, that's what it says. 110 00:06:48,220 --> 00:06:49,220 Okay. 111 00:06:49,220 --> 00:06:50,780 So this is just the design amendment. 112 00:06:50,780 --> 00:06:55,900 The actual construction project is going to be, we're estimating around $21 million for 113 00:06:55,900 --> 00:07:04,420 the actual construction of the water, wastewater, drainage, and street reconstruction from 380 114 00:07:04,420 --> 00:07:05,420 to Oak. 115 00:07:05,420 --> 00:07:06,420 Okay. 116 00:07:06,420 --> 00:07:07,420 So you'll see that come back. 117 00:07:07,420 --> 00:07:08,420 That is just the engineering. 118 00:07:08,420 --> 00:07:09,420 This is just the design. 119 00:07:09,420 --> 00:07:10,420 Yes, sir. 120 00:07:10,420 --> 00:07:19,620 So this will not be included in the construction of a little over 2 million is what you said? 121 00:07:19,620 --> 00:07:20,620 21. 122 00:07:20,620 --> 00:07:21,620 21 million. 123 00:07:21,620 --> 00:07:22,620 Right. 124 00:07:22,620 --> 00:07:23,620 Sorry. 125 00:07:23,620 --> 00:07:24,620 Sorry. 126 00:07:24,620 --> 00:07:26,420 This is the entire project, not just the portion around the square. 127 00:07:26,420 --> 00:07:27,420 Correct. 128 00:07:27,420 --> 00:07:32,100 This is the design of the entire project from 380 to Oak. 129 00:07:32,100 --> 00:07:33,100 Okay. 130 00:07:33,100 --> 00:07:34,100 That's where I got confused. 131 00:07:34,100 --> 00:07:35,100 All right. 132 00:07:35,100 --> 00:07:36,100 That's all I got. 133 00:07:36,100 --> 00:07:37,100 Anyone else? 134 00:07:37,100 --> 00:07:41,140 All right. 135 00:07:41,140 --> 00:07:43,800 Do we have a motion to approve item A? 136 00:07:43,800 --> 00:07:44,800 So moved. 137 00:07:44,800 --> 00:07:45,800 Mr. Radwick moves. 138 00:07:45,800 --> 00:07:46,800 Second? 139 00:07:46,800 --> 00:07:47,800 Good job. 140 00:07:47,800 --> 00:07:48,800 Second. 141 00:07:48,800 --> 00:07:50,800 Mr. Taylor, all in favor? 142 00:07:50,800 --> 00:07:51,800 Aye. 143 00:07:51,800 --> 00:07:52,800 Aye. 144 00:07:52,800 --> 00:07:53,800 Motion carries. 145 00:07:53,800 --> 00:08:22,020 Good morning, David Brown, Water Utilities Project Manager. 146 00:08:22,020 --> 00:08:26,780 Today I bring to you the construction manager at risk design phase contract for our expansion 147 00:08:26,780 --> 00:08:29,780 out of the concrete water reclamation plant. 148 00:08:29,780 --> 00:08:32,780 So let's talk just to refresh what's going on out there. 149 00:08:32,780 --> 00:08:37,660 The plant's over 60 years old, and of course there's a 75/90 rule that we have over at 150 00:08:37,660 --> 00:08:43,780 TCEQ through TCEQ that at 75 percent we need to be in design for the plant expansion, and 151 00:08:43,780 --> 00:08:46,140 at 90 we need to be in construction. 152 00:08:46,140 --> 00:08:49,660 Right now it's close to the 75, so our design has started. 153 00:08:49,660 --> 00:08:51,860 It's about at 30 percent. 154 00:08:51,860 --> 00:08:55,580 So what we're going to touch, we're going to go to a different technology for, is membrane 155 00:08:55,580 --> 00:09:01,300 bioreactor filtration, and also we'll do some improvements with our headworks. 156 00:09:01,300 --> 00:09:05,380 Prior to that, we had a headworks project that we approved for design, and then we went 157 00:09:05,380 --> 00:09:06,380 to expansion. 158 00:09:06,380 --> 00:09:11,620 We felt that it's best to combine these in construction, combine those at the same time 159 00:09:11,620 --> 00:09:16,220 the plant will be going, this portion of the expansion will be going at the same time. 160 00:09:16,220 --> 00:09:21,420 So with that, TCEQ did approve a permit up to 30 MGD, so that's approved. 161 00:09:21,420 --> 00:09:25,700 And also we're going to replace the headworks and an existing 24 inch plant interceptor 162 00:09:25,700 --> 00:09:26,700 over there. 163 00:09:26,700 --> 00:09:29,540 Could I just ask what headworks means? 164 00:09:29,540 --> 00:09:33,900 Headworks is where everything from the city comes in, influent-wise. 165 00:09:33,900 --> 00:09:37,980 So there's actually a lift station there, but it's headworks, and everything from the 166 00:09:37,980 --> 00:09:42,820 city comes there through all the interceptors, and then it pumps out into the plant. 167 00:09:42,820 --> 00:09:45,060 Thank you. 168 00:09:45,060 --> 00:09:48,100 So with that, we wanted to use a construction management risk. 169 00:09:48,100 --> 00:09:50,260 This will be the first one for our department. 170 00:09:50,260 --> 00:09:55,580 The advantage of that is being able to start some construction early on, and also have 171 00:09:55,580 --> 00:10:01,700 the CMAR look at design and help the design to cut out some things and get a better product 172 00:10:01,700 --> 00:10:03,820 in a way so we can move quicker. 173 00:10:03,820 --> 00:10:08,700 We're finding a lot of things have lead times as far as electrical, so we can jump on that 174 00:10:08,700 --> 00:10:09,700 as well. 175 00:10:09,700 --> 00:10:15,700 And we'll bring several different phases of the construction, and that'll be a recommendation 176 00:10:15,700 --> 00:10:19,040 of the CMAR, how we bring that phase approach. 177 00:10:19,040 --> 00:10:22,180 So we had two proposals came in. 178 00:10:22,180 --> 00:10:26,460 We evaluated it with an evaluation committee. 179 00:10:26,460 --> 00:10:30,740 Sunk construction was chosen, and here's their cost. 180 00:10:30,740 --> 00:10:34,140 It's $2,452,441. 181 00:10:34,140 --> 00:10:39,100 So with that, cost modeling, constructability review, and this is just in the design phase. 182 00:10:39,100 --> 00:10:43,940 So they'll help us go through and recommend for our phases when we start, and we'll bring 183 00:10:43,940 --> 00:10:46,940 other phases to you. 184 00:10:46,940 --> 00:10:49,700 So here's the project schedule, CMAR design. 185 00:10:49,700 --> 00:10:53,140 Like I said, Kim Lee Horne is our designer on both projects. 186 00:10:53,140 --> 00:10:59,060 Sunt will join and get involved with it between the city and Kim Lee Horne in order to help 187 00:10:59,060 --> 00:11:01,500 us out. 188 00:11:01,500 --> 00:11:05,140 Phase approval is today for the CMAR, and then the design approval. 189 00:11:05,140 --> 00:11:08,700 We're looking for the first phase around the quarter four of 2024. 190 00:11:08,700 --> 00:11:15,100 We'll start construction '25 and complete construction around 2027. 191 00:11:15,100 --> 00:11:20,420 So that staff recommendation is that we adopt a contract with Sunt Construction. 192 00:11:20,420 --> 00:11:22,020 Be glad to answer any questions. 193 00:11:22,020 --> 00:11:24,900 I know Devin had a question earlier. 194 00:11:24,900 --> 00:11:28,140 Really quickly, if you could go back to the map slide. 195 00:11:28,140 --> 00:11:31,940 Let me see if I go back. 196 00:11:31,940 --> 00:11:32,940 Which one would you like? 197 00:11:32,940 --> 00:11:34,980 Yeah, I think this one. 198 00:11:34,980 --> 00:11:37,620 So what is red and what is blue? 199 00:11:37,620 --> 00:11:43,380 The red would be, blue is the initial, what we're looking at initially. 200 00:11:43,380 --> 00:11:47,980 This is not set in stone how we're going to go, but this is kind of how we're looking. 201 00:11:47,980 --> 00:11:52,100 We're going to put, and I'll show you, we're going to put the headworks over here. 202 00:11:52,100 --> 00:11:56,260 Right now that's where the headworks would be in conjunction with where the primary, 203 00:11:56,260 --> 00:11:59,020 I mean the MBR facility is. 204 00:11:59,020 --> 00:12:02,460 Okay, so like this is like a phase one, phase two expansion. 205 00:12:02,460 --> 00:12:03,460 Yes sir. 206 00:12:03,460 --> 00:12:09,620 So with CMAR you're able to, it's kind of a module effect where you can add modules for 207 00:12:09,620 --> 00:12:17,860 your CMAR, I'm sorry not CMAR, MBR, you can add modules for your MBR to gain more capacity. 208 00:12:17,860 --> 00:12:23,220 We're going to build the headworks at 75 MGD, so we're already ready for the future. 209 00:12:23,220 --> 00:12:29,580 The first initial phase, we're looking at a 5 MGD MBR, so that'll get us up to 26, maybe 210 00:12:29,580 --> 00:12:32,740 up to 30 in some instances, but that's the initial. 211 00:12:32,740 --> 00:12:38,020 But what it does is sets us up for success so we can go ahead and be ready just to a 212 00:12:38,020 --> 00:12:43,940 quicker upgrade in capacity by doing that modular approach. 213 00:12:43,940 --> 00:12:44,940 Thank you. 214 00:12:44,940 --> 00:12:45,940 Yes sir. 215 00:12:45,940 --> 00:12:46,940 Questions? 216 00:12:46,940 --> 00:12:47,940 Mr. Ryback. 217 00:12:47,940 --> 00:12:48,940 Yes. 218 00:12:48,940 --> 00:12:58,860 So I was wondering, since you've, since the recommendation is to retain Sunt as the construction 219 00:12:58,860 --> 00:13:05,220 manager at risk, so they're hired for the project, not just for the design phase. 220 00:13:05,220 --> 00:13:09,140 They're hired for the project and they will bring, once they go through the design phase, 221 00:13:09,140 --> 00:13:14,980 they will bring, basically they'll bring three bids, they'll recommend the packages, and 222 00:13:14,980 --> 00:13:19,820 they'll bring three bids with one of them being Sunt construction. 223 00:13:19,820 --> 00:13:26,140 Okay so Sunt would also potentially act as general contractor in addition to the CM at 224 00:13:26,140 --> 00:13:27,140 risk. 225 00:13:27,140 --> 00:13:28,140 Yes sir. 226 00:13:28,140 --> 00:13:29,140 Okay. 227 00:13:29,140 --> 00:13:30,140 I was curious about that. 228 00:13:30,140 --> 00:13:33,620 So they'll actually go out and they have their evaluation, they'll go out and actually evaluate 229 00:13:33,620 --> 00:13:39,340 the bids and actually say hey, we think this is good for us to do it or another company 230 00:13:39,340 --> 00:13:41,900 to do it, but they'll be, yeah, yes sir. 231 00:13:41,900 --> 00:13:47,580 Well I noticed in the evaluation there were only two companies who actually fully responded 232 00:13:47,580 --> 00:13:55,580 to the request for a proposal and being as they are both companies that do a lot of this 233 00:13:55,580 --> 00:14:02,620 kind of work, I suppose it's possible that Sunt could end up hiring Archer Western to 234 00:14:02,620 --> 00:14:04,420 do some portion of the work. 235 00:14:04,420 --> 00:14:05,420 It's a possibility. 236 00:14:05,420 --> 00:14:11,300 Yeah those are the, those are kind of the big players in our area, Archer Western and 237 00:14:11,300 --> 00:14:12,300 Sunt. 238 00:14:12,300 --> 00:14:13,300 Okay. 239 00:14:13,300 --> 00:14:14,300 Other questions? 240 00:14:14,300 --> 00:14:15,300 Yes. 241 00:14:15,300 --> 00:14:16,300 Yes. 242 00:14:16,300 --> 00:14:19,940 I think I got this one right. 243 00:14:19,940 --> 00:14:24,900 On the scoring criteria, qualification and experience of the firm. 244 00:14:24,900 --> 00:14:30,420 You found that Archer Western was not qualified, not as qualified or experienced. 245 00:14:30,420 --> 00:14:35,420 One thing is is that Sunt had a little bit more experience in the CMAR with the group 246 00:14:35,420 --> 00:14:39,500 that Archer Western sent was a little less experience on CMAR. 247 00:14:39,500 --> 00:14:44,700 So this being our first CMAR, we have, want to be able to, what they brought to us was 248 00:14:44,700 --> 00:14:48,220 a more experience in that realm. 249 00:14:48,220 --> 00:14:49,220 Okay. 250 00:14:49,220 --> 00:14:53,580 A little, and then there's a little bit down on pre-construction services and that probably 251 00:14:53,580 --> 00:14:56,700 was presentation I would imagine. 252 00:14:56,700 --> 00:15:02,940 Quality assurance and quality control, does that have more to do with item number one? 253 00:15:02,940 --> 00:15:05,060 As far as just the proposals or? 254 00:15:05,060 --> 00:15:06,420 Yeah, yeah, of course. 255 00:15:06,420 --> 00:15:07,420 That's what you graded. 256 00:15:07,420 --> 00:15:08,820 You graded the proposals, correct? 257 00:15:08,820 --> 00:15:13,580 They brought us, they brought a, one of the things that was impressive is being able to 258 00:15:13,580 --> 00:15:19,100 evaluate when we need to purchase things or when we didn't as far as just the way the 259 00:15:19,100 --> 00:15:20,300 market is. 260 00:15:20,300 --> 00:15:24,940 They're going to bring that to us, you know, do we want to purchase electrical stuff right 261 00:15:24,940 --> 00:15:25,940 now? 262 00:15:25,940 --> 00:15:30,940 Because now do we want to, they can evaluate the price range and give, hey, this is a good 263 00:15:30,940 --> 00:15:32,300 chance to buy it. 264 00:15:32,300 --> 00:15:34,020 That's what they brought to the table. 265 00:15:34,020 --> 00:15:35,020 Okay. 266 00:15:35,020 --> 00:15:40,180 So $800,000 difference in cost? 267 00:15:40,180 --> 00:15:41,180 Yeah. 268 00:15:41,180 --> 00:15:42,180 Gotcha. 269 00:15:42,180 --> 00:15:43,180 All right. 270 00:15:43,180 --> 00:15:44,180 Well. 271 00:15:44,180 --> 00:15:53,060 Kyle was on the evaluation committee, you got something to add? 272 00:15:53,060 --> 00:15:54,060 Yeah, real quick. 273 00:15:54,060 --> 00:15:58,980 I'm Kyle Pedigo, so I'm the planning and engineering division manager for water utilities. 274 00:15:58,980 --> 00:16:04,920 Regarding the experience, both are extremely experienced in wastewater treatment processes. 275 00:16:04,920 --> 00:16:11,320 With Sunt, like David said, they have much more experience delivering these projects 276 00:16:11,320 --> 00:16:12,900 through the CMR approach. 277 00:16:12,900 --> 00:16:19,620 So when we looked at them, Archer Western seemed like a contractor that can do CMR, 278 00:16:19,620 --> 00:16:23,860 and Sunt seemed like a CMR contractor that could deliver the package smoothly. 279 00:16:23,860 --> 00:16:27,180 So that was a big contributing factor in the analysis. 280 00:16:27,180 --> 00:16:32,900 And you said this is the first one, CRM, that you're doing, so you wanted it done. 281 00:16:32,900 --> 00:16:33,900 Through water utilities. 282 00:16:33,900 --> 00:16:34,900 So the city has done CMR. 283 00:16:34,900 --> 00:16:35,900 Yeah. 284 00:16:35,900 --> 00:16:36,900 But for you. 285 00:16:36,900 --> 00:16:37,900 Yeah. 286 00:16:37,900 --> 00:16:38,900 But for our group, this is the first one. 287 00:16:38,900 --> 00:16:44,860 And with that, they seemed to be the better fit for our group. 288 00:16:44,860 --> 00:16:46,860 Okay. 289 00:16:46,860 --> 00:16:51,140 What do you estimate the value of this project eventually costing? 290 00:16:51,140 --> 00:16:55,700 Yeah, right now we're looking, our initial EAC is right at $185 million. 291 00:16:55,700 --> 00:16:56,700 $185 million. 292 00:16:56,700 --> 00:16:58,860 So this is just the beginning of the engineering. 293 00:16:58,860 --> 00:16:59,860 Yeah. 294 00:16:59,860 --> 00:17:01,660 So this will bring us up to the construction. 295 00:17:01,660 --> 00:17:02,660 Yeah. 296 00:17:02,660 --> 00:17:05,660 So whoever gets in here has got their foot in the door for the CMR, obviously. 297 00:17:05,660 --> 00:17:10,060 Well, they have to bid out packages, so each work package has to be open bid. 298 00:17:10,060 --> 00:17:15,220 So once we get up to that point, they'll deliver their guaranteed maximum price that we sign 299 00:17:15,220 --> 00:17:16,220 them up for. 300 00:17:16,220 --> 00:17:17,220 Gotcha. 301 00:17:17,220 --> 00:17:20,740 And then the work package will be bid out individually. 302 00:17:20,740 --> 00:17:32,820 So the group that you sent over, or the group that they sent over, you thought that SUNT 303 00:17:32,820 --> 00:17:34,620 sold themselves the best? 304 00:17:34,620 --> 00:17:40,980 It was, yeah, the committee was universal after both presentations that SUNT presented 305 00:17:40,980 --> 00:17:41,980 the better product. 306 00:17:41,980 --> 00:17:42,980 Okay. 307 00:17:42,980 --> 00:17:43,980 All right. 308 00:17:43,980 --> 00:17:46,980 Well, that's all the questions I have. 309 00:17:46,980 --> 00:17:48,580 I know which way I'm going about it. 310 00:17:48,580 --> 00:17:52,180 I would like to comment on your question, and I understand and appreciate it because 311 00:17:52,180 --> 00:17:57,460 I too looked at that and looked at the difference, but I've actually had some experience with 312 00:17:57,460 --> 00:18:04,460 both companies and construction projects over the last couple of decades, and I support 313 00:18:04,460 --> 00:18:05,620 your decision. 314 00:18:05,620 --> 00:18:13,020 I think SUNT has done a better job at the manager at risk portion of the work. 315 00:18:13,020 --> 00:18:19,140 I work with Archer Western primarily on design bid projects and that seemed to be more their 316 00:18:19,140 --> 00:18:23,020 lane was working on stuff that other people put together. 317 00:18:23,020 --> 00:18:29,020 So it seemed like I had the same concern that Billy did about the difference in price, but 318 00:18:29,020 --> 00:18:34,900 thinking back on it, it seemed like SUNT had done more of that work and they had more pre-construction 319 00:18:34,900 --> 00:18:41,040 personnel, that they have people that do just that sort of thing and are committed to it. 320 00:18:41,040 --> 00:18:46,580 So I agree, it's a little bit of a bump in price, but I think you picked the right horse. 321 00:18:46,580 --> 00:18:47,580 Thank you. 322 00:18:47,580 --> 00:18:50,380 Appreciate you sharing that. 323 00:18:50,380 --> 00:18:52,380 Any other questions? 324 00:18:52,380 --> 00:18:54,300 Do we have a motion to approve item B? 325 00:18:54,300 --> 00:18:55,300 So moved. 326 00:18:55,300 --> 00:18:56,300 Mr. Rybick moved. 327 00:18:56,300 --> 00:18:59,300 Do we have a second? 328 00:18:59,300 --> 00:19:00,300 Second. 329 00:19:00,300 --> 00:19:01,300 Mr. Pluck seconds. 330 00:19:01,300 --> 00:19:02,300 All in favor say aye. 331 00:19:02,300 --> 00:19:03,300 Aye. 332 00:19:03,300 --> 00:19:04,300 All right. 333 00:19:04,300 --> 00:19:05,300 Nay. 334 00:19:05,300 --> 00:19:06,300 Nay. 335 00:19:06,300 --> 00:19:07,300 Oh, and a nay. 336 00:19:07,300 --> 00:19:08,300 We have a nay. 337 00:19:08,300 --> 00:19:09,300 Sorry. 338 00:19:09,300 --> 00:19:16,300 I would like this type of contracting anyway, I think I'll make that clear. 339 00:19:16,300 --> 00:19:17,300 Okay. 340 00:19:17,300 --> 00:19:18,300 Oh, you're not on. 341 00:19:18,300 --> 00:19:19,300 I voted. 342 00:19:19,300 --> 00:19:20,300 Nay. 343 00:19:20,300 --> 00:19:21,300 Thank you. 344 00:19:21,300 --> 00:19:31,420 All right, item G. And I know both Billy and Lee have questions on this one. 345 00:19:31,420 --> 00:19:56,660 Excuse me for one moment please. 346 00:19:56,660 --> 00:19:57,660 Sure. 347 00:19:57,660 --> 00:20:20,740 Good morning. 348 00:20:20,740 --> 00:20:21,740 Good morning. 349 00:20:21,740 --> 00:20:22,740 My name is Capitolia Brown. 350 00:20:22,740 --> 00:20:27,780 I'm a Senior Real Estate Specialist, and I'm here today with Cole Tankersley, who is the 351 00:20:27,780 --> 00:20:33,380 project manager, and Stephen Gay, the Director of Water Utilities. 352 00:20:33,380 --> 00:20:38,980 And we're here to talk to you briefly about the I-35 utility relocate project that we 353 00:20:38,980 --> 00:20:44,260 have going on. 354 00:20:44,260 --> 00:20:52,200 The project overview for this is water utility relocate supporting the I-35 widening. 355 00:20:52,200 --> 00:20:57,100 This is a textile reimbursable program of 100 percent. 356 00:20:57,100 --> 00:21:04,980 And this will go from Meadow Street to Fort Worth Drive, it's on the access road. 357 00:21:04,980 --> 00:21:12,700 They have a project schedule, and the project schedule is to be completed. 358 00:21:12,700 --> 00:21:20,180 The engineering part was completed November 23, public utilities board for January was 359 00:21:20,180 --> 00:21:26,380 for today, and then tomorrow we're looking to take this to council for January the 23rd 360 00:21:26,380 --> 00:21:31,260 for a notice to proceed for second quarter of 2024. 361 00:21:31,260 --> 00:21:36,100 And we have the construction completion, the third and fourth quarter, and the third quarter 362 00:21:36,100 --> 00:21:44,180 doing a 90-day calendar, with the fourth quarter 120-day calendar. 363 00:21:44,180 --> 00:21:51,780 Three details, it's currently owned by 5-Sac Self-Storaging and 18-Sac Storage, and that's 364 00:21:51,780 --> 00:21:53,680 U-Haul. 365 00:21:53,680 --> 00:22:00,780 And the acres that we're looking to acquire will be 2.1 acres, with an appraised value 366 00:22:00,780 --> 00:22:10,140 of $23,249, and the square foot value on that is $4.37. 367 00:22:10,140 --> 00:22:16,820 From their other piece of the profiting, we're doing the 0.78 acres, just a little under 368 00:22:16,820 --> 00:22:27,060 one acre, that's valued at $14,017, and the appraised value is $4.37. 369 00:22:27,060 --> 00:22:34,420 And this is just to expand and improve the northbound right-of-way on I-35. 370 00:22:34,420 --> 00:22:39,100 Our recommendation, we're here today, we're going to take, wanting to take this to council 371 00:22:39,100 --> 00:22:44,660 for tomorrow to establish authority to negotiate the acquisition of the easements using the 372 00:22:44,660 --> 00:22:49,180 eminent domain, if necessary. 373 00:22:49,180 --> 00:22:52,100 Any questions? 374 00:22:52,100 --> 00:22:56,660 - I have a question. 375 00:22:56,660 --> 00:23:03,860 I noticed that on this project, we were retaining health and associates, and we're also retaining 376 00:23:03,860 --> 00:23:06,020 them as a surveyor on another project. 377 00:23:06,020 --> 00:23:12,540 I was just a little confused about the property acquisition, and the survey company, and... 378 00:23:12,540 --> 00:23:22,540 - Right, for the property acquisition, we have at least 12 companies, and we sent this 379 00:23:22,540 --> 00:23:28,460 out for a bid, and they came back as the better choice for the bid, and that's how we chose 380 00:23:28,460 --> 00:23:32,580 half associates for the real acquisition property. 381 00:23:32,580 --> 00:23:37,060 - So have we used them before in this service, or is this something new that they're doing? 382 00:23:37,060 --> 00:23:42,300 - Half associates is an engineering firm, but they have multiple branches, or departments, 383 00:23:42,300 --> 00:23:43,300 I guess I should say. 384 00:23:43,300 --> 00:23:49,660 So they have an acquisitions department, a relocations department, or division, and survey 385 00:23:49,660 --> 00:23:50,660 and engineering. 386 00:23:50,660 --> 00:23:52,860 - Okay, so they're more than a surveying firm. 387 00:23:52,860 --> 00:23:53,860 - Yes. 388 00:23:53,860 --> 00:23:58,700 - But I was just surprised to see them in two relatively different categories in the 389 00:23:58,700 --> 00:24:03,380 same consent agenda, and I was like, "I wanted to at least ask about that relationship and 390 00:24:03,380 --> 00:24:05,940 capacity or capability." 391 00:24:05,940 --> 00:24:12,100 - And really, the action you're asking from us is to give you the authority to negotiate 392 00:24:12,100 --> 00:24:15,340 and use eminent domain, or make the recommendation to the council. 393 00:24:15,340 --> 00:24:16,340 - Yes. 394 00:24:16,340 --> 00:24:17,340 - Okay. 395 00:24:17,340 --> 00:24:18,340 - That is correct. 396 00:24:18,340 --> 00:24:19,340 - Okay. 397 00:24:19,340 --> 00:24:20,340 - Go ahead. 398 00:24:20,340 --> 00:24:30,700 - Could you bring up the picture of the take? 399 00:24:30,700 --> 00:24:34,900 - Let me see if there are other, yeah, that's the best one, I think. 400 00:24:34,900 --> 00:24:44,500 So there are going to be easements along the U-Haul side, and I'm sorry, I don't see a 401 00:24:44,500 --> 00:24:45,500 better picture. 402 00:24:45,500 --> 00:24:46,500 - A better picture. 403 00:24:46,500 --> 00:24:47,500 - Yeah, that's why... 404 00:24:47,500 --> 00:24:49,900 - But it's right along here. 405 00:24:49,900 --> 00:24:50,900 - Okay. 406 00:24:50,900 --> 00:24:54,900 - So how many feet into the property is it? 407 00:24:54,900 --> 00:24:56,180 20? 408 00:24:56,180 --> 00:24:59,100 - 20 feet? 409 00:24:59,100 --> 00:25:03,140 - Yes, sir. 410 00:25:03,140 --> 00:25:04,700 - And it's a subsurface easement. 411 00:25:04,700 --> 00:25:10,620 - Good morning, Council, I'm Cole Tangersley, I'll be the project manager for the construction 412 00:25:10,620 --> 00:25:11,620 portion of this. 413 00:25:11,620 --> 00:25:17,420 Let me see here, what's the next page? 414 00:25:17,420 --> 00:25:21,460 - So the easement's only going to be a 20-foot easement, and it's going to basically go to 415 00:25:21,460 --> 00:25:25,220 about right where this line is right here, just past the concrete. 416 00:25:25,220 --> 00:25:28,700 The only reason we're getting this easement is because initially, and then the rest of 417 00:25:28,700 --> 00:25:32,700 the project, we're going to be operating inside of TXOT's driveway with a permit. 418 00:25:32,700 --> 00:25:37,900 But because they're going to be rebuilding this bridge that goes over the train tracks 419 00:25:37,900 --> 00:25:42,540 here, the riprap's going to go too far over, and we can't get our lines under it. 420 00:25:42,540 --> 00:25:45,580 So we ended up having to just move out another 20 feet. 421 00:25:45,580 --> 00:25:53,740 So it's just a strip right along, just past the right here, so then it goes down all the 422 00:25:53,740 --> 00:25:54,740 way. 423 00:25:54,740 --> 00:25:55,740 And we're just going to be moving this waterline back. 424 00:25:55,740 --> 00:25:59,460 - So you're just moving the waterline back, and really the take is going to be on that 425 00:25:59,460 --> 00:26:04,680 north side of the parking lot, so they end up losing some parking spots, is that what? 426 00:26:04,680 --> 00:26:08,320 - They won't lose any parking spots, these are 50% easements, usually subsurface. 427 00:26:08,320 --> 00:26:11,580 So as long as they don't put anything, it'll look the same for them. 428 00:26:11,580 --> 00:26:12,580 - They don't put a structure up there. 429 00:26:12,580 --> 00:26:13,580 - No structure, that's right. 430 00:26:13,580 --> 00:26:18,380 So the parking lot won't change, and that's why you see the appraisals, the amounts usually 431 00:26:18,380 --> 00:26:19,380 like a lower amount. 432 00:26:19,380 --> 00:26:23,500 - Do you have that agreement, I mean obviously you haven't pulled the trigger on the deal, 433 00:26:23,500 --> 00:26:28,380 you're trying to work it out so you don't have to go to condemnation, but do you have 434 00:26:28,380 --> 00:26:32,220 an agreement with the property owner about, do you have an agreement with the property 435 00:26:32,220 --> 00:26:37,300 owner about allowing them to put the parking lots, parking spaces back in there? 436 00:26:37,300 --> 00:26:42,020 - The easement, the city's standard easement document allows for flat work. 437 00:26:42,020 --> 00:26:46,020 It allows for paving, so they would continue to be able to use it as parking. 438 00:26:46,020 --> 00:26:51,100 - Will TextDot's work go into that new easement as well? 439 00:26:51,100 --> 00:26:55,140 - This will be outside of the new TextDot right of way. 440 00:26:55,140 --> 00:26:58,500 That's why the easement is needed, it's being moved outside of the right of way. 441 00:26:58,500 --> 00:27:01,220 - But they're not acquiring anymore as far as you know? 442 00:27:01,220 --> 00:27:04,500 - They've already acquired, that's why the city is needing to relocate its utilities. 443 00:27:04,500 --> 00:27:05,980 - So they're not acquiring anymore as far as you know? 444 00:27:05,980 --> 00:27:07,740 - As far as I know, that's correct. 445 00:27:07,740 --> 00:27:08,740 - Okay. 446 00:27:08,740 --> 00:27:17,180 - Just related question, is this the only location we expect to have additional easement 447 00:27:17,180 --> 00:27:20,140 procured outside of the TextDot right of way? 448 00:27:20,140 --> 00:27:21,140 - That's correct. 449 00:27:21,140 --> 00:27:24,220 - The other side, we have plenty of room. 450 00:27:24,220 --> 00:27:29,460 This side here, if they didn't, if they weren't building the road up, we would have had room 451 00:27:29,460 --> 00:27:32,940 as well, but when we started doing engineering, it just doesn't work. 452 00:27:32,940 --> 00:27:35,460 We'll be under that, it just doesn't work. 453 00:27:35,460 --> 00:27:38,820 So we have, unfortunately we had to squeeze out a little bit. 454 00:27:38,820 --> 00:27:44,500 - Specifically for this creek with the changes to the bridge, so the rest of I-35E all the 455 00:27:44,500 --> 00:27:48,180 way down through South Denton, is that finalized yet? 456 00:27:48,180 --> 00:27:50,820 - This is a very small project. 457 00:27:50,820 --> 00:27:57,460 It's only this side of the road here, most of those other projects you're discussing 458 00:27:57,460 --> 00:28:00,420 sir are already in construction. 459 00:28:00,420 --> 00:28:06,060 The only project is gonna start from this water line right here, we'll move back inside 460 00:28:06,060 --> 00:28:09,620 of TextDot's easement and then just this water line right here are the only two pieces that 461 00:28:09,620 --> 00:28:10,620 are affected. 462 00:28:10,620 --> 00:28:14,740 So it's, and project's concerns is relatively small. 463 00:28:14,740 --> 00:28:17,620 - Okay, and I understand this one is just a small area. 464 00:28:17,620 --> 00:28:21,900 I guess I was trying to understand if we're going to see more of these in the coming year 465 00:28:21,900 --> 00:28:22,900 or two. 466 00:28:22,900 --> 00:28:28,420 - Staff has already taken the other items to council authorizing the acquisition. 467 00:28:28,420 --> 00:28:32,900 So this is another one of those projects that's been in the works for a few years now. 468 00:28:32,900 --> 00:28:40,340 So we've already started the acquisition relocation of utilities and as Cole mentioned, they've 469 00:28:40,340 --> 00:28:43,940 already been in construction, many of them, most of them so. 470 00:28:43,940 --> 00:28:44,940 - Thank you. 471 00:28:44,940 --> 00:28:45,940 Okay, I'm good. 472 00:28:45,940 --> 00:28:46,940 - You're good, okay. 473 00:28:46,940 --> 00:28:47,940 No other questions? 474 00:28:47,940 --> 00:28:52,980 All right, do we have a motion to approve item G? 475 00:28:52,980 --> 00:28:53,980 - So moved. 476 00:28:53,980 --> 00:28:56,540 - Billy moves, do we have a second? 477 00:28:56,540 --> 00:28:57,540 Lee seconds. 478 00:28:57,540 --> 00:28:58,540 - All in favor say aye. 479 00:28:58,540 --> 00:28:59,540 - Aye. 480 00:28:59,540 --> 00:29:00,540 - Opposed? 481 00:29:00,540 --> 00:29:01,540 Okay. 482 00:29:01,540 --> 00:29:07,460 Items for individual consideration. 483 00:29:07,460 --> 00:29:10,080 Consider approval of the January 8th, 2024 minutes. 484 00:29:10,080 --> 00:29:13,260 Were there any changes or corrections? 485 00:29:13,260 --> 00:29:14,580 I hope not, I signed them. 486 00:29:14,580 --> 00:29:16,180 Do we have a motion to approve? 487 00:29:16,180 --> 00:29:21,220 Thomas moved, Lee second, all in favor say aye. 488 00:29:21,220 --> 00:29:22,220 - Aye. 489 00:29:22,220 --> 00:29:23,220 - Aye. 490 00:29:23,220 --> 00:29:28,540 - Do we have approval of the revised public utilities board meeting schedule of 2024? 491 00:29:28,540 --> 00:29:31,340 Do we have a motion to approve the new calendar? 492 00:29:31,340 --> 00:29:33,340 - So moved. 493 00:29:33,340 --> 00:29:36,940 - Billy moves, Lee seconds, how's that? 494 00:29:36,940 --> 00:29:38,540 All in favor say aye. 495 00:29:38,540 --> 00:29:39,540 - Aye. 496 00:29:39,540 --> 00:29:41,540 - Okay, management reports. 497 00:29:41,540 --> 00:29:47,180 - Madam Chair, members of the PAB, just really quick on the calendars, I wanna make sure 498 00:29:47,180 --> 00:29:50,660 that you noted that November 18th was a date that changed. 499 00:29:50,660 --> 00:29:56,460 I tried to coax Kim into doing a presentation, she refused, so thank you for that. 500 00:29:56,460 --> 00:30:01,840 We caught that after the fact and so nobody wanted to meet on veteran's day, so we wouldn't 501 00:30:01,840 --> 00:30:03,320 be here. 502 00:30:03,320 --> 00:30:09,580 So on new business action items, the only item that we have left here is related to 503 00:30:09,580 --> 00:30:14,860 the EV vehicles, we'll be bringing back, we asked for a year for that, we'll be working 504 00:30:14,860 --> 00:30:17,660 with Fleet to get that information to you. 505 00:30:17,660 --> 00:30:24,740 And then future agenda items, we only have the one item on here, which we already did, 506 00:30:24,740 --> 00:30:29,300 we are waiting for the budget department to complete their calendar and then we'll populate 507 00:30:29,300 --> 00:30:34,960 that here, but again, as you know, that will be heavy into the budget here before too long, 508 00:30:34,960 --> 00:30:40,380 so we'll get those dates to you, that way you can mark your personal calendars as well. 509 00:30:40,380 --> 00:30:47,100 With that, that completes the management update, unless you have any questions for me. 510 00:30:47,100 --> 00:30:54,340 I have one, have we had any concerns with supply for our power grid during the recent 511 00:30:54,340 --> 00:30:57,540 cold snap or are we doing good? 512 00:30:57,540 --> 00:31:02,660 Well, lots of concerns, that's for sure. 513 00:31:02,660 --> 00:31:08,380 I think that RCOT has been able to keep the supply, you know, mean the demand, we did 514 00:31:08,380 --> 00:31:14,620 have a few closed days there a couple of weeks ago, but I think generally speaking, I think 515 00:31:14,620 --> 00:31:15,620 we've fared pretty well. 516 00:31:15,620 --> 00:31:22,340 It hasn't been as cold as other years, and so we're hoping that that will continue, but 517 00:31:22,340 --> 00:31:28,500 certainly a concern that we deal with every single day in 15-minute increments, just so 518 00:31:28,500 --> 00:31:34,620 you're aware of, so, yeah. 519 00:31:34,620 --> 00:31:35,620 Any other questions? 520 00:31:35,620 --> 00:31:40,580 Okay, on concluding items, does any board member wish to have something put on a future 521 00:31:40,580 --> 00:31:43,580 agenda or say something to the public? 522 00:31:43,580 --> 00:31:45,780 I see none. 523 00:31:45,780 --> 00:31:47,900 Let's go into the work session. 524 00:31:47,900 --> 00:31:58,620 Receive a report, hold a discussion, and give staff direction -- oh, and it cut it off. 525 00:31:58,620 --> 00:32:06,140 Oh, on the dead-end criteria's manual, thank you. 526 00:32:06,140 --> 00:32:07,580 Good morning, everybody. 527 00:32:07,580 --> 00:32:12,260 My name is Brett Bourgeois, I am the deputy city engineer here at Denton, and I am here 528 00:32:12,260 --> 00:32:18,060 to present the proposed updates to our criteria manuals for this year. 529 00:32:18,060 --> 00:32:22,540 So a little bit overview of our agenda, we're going to have a -- kind of discuss what our 530 00:32:22,540 --> 00:32:26,260 public outreach plan has been for this year, go through a little bit of background on what 531 00:32:26,260 --> 00:32:32,540 the criteria manuals are, talk about the high-level changes that we're proposing, and some next 532 00:32:32,540 --> 00:32:35,780 steps for the process going forward here. 533 00:32:35,780 --> 00:32:39,620 I have in attendance multiple technical experts in different departments across the city that 534 00:32:39,620 --> 00:32:45,660 are able to answer any specific questions you may have that I can't answer. 535 00:32:45,660 --> 00:32:49,940 So our public utility or our public outreach plan this year has been started in September. 536 00:32:49,940 --> 00:32:55,140 We all developed our town hall, brought all developers into the Development Services Center, 537 00:32:55,140 --> 00:32:59,020 presented a lot of the high-level overview or high-level changes that we're proposing, 538 00:32:59,020 --> 00:33:05,660 discussed the process that we're going through, and opened them up for feedback from the community. 539 00:33:05,660 --> 00:33:10,300 We published the criteria manuals online in November once we had a draft that had been 540 00:33:10,300 --> 00:33:14,780 reviewed internally enough that we felt was confident to be published online to receive 541 00:33:14,780 --> 00:33:16,460 outside comments. 542 00:33:16,460 --> 00:33:20,380 We then presented to the Texas Society of Professional Engineers that represents the 543 00:33:20,380 --> 00:33:24,980 Denton district, Denton area, so we got all the engineering firms in, presented the changes 544 00:33:24,980 --> 00:33:25,980 to them as well. 545 00:33:25,980 --> 00:33:31,740 We went to plan the zoning commission a few weeks ago on the 10th, and we're here today. 546 00:33:31,740 --> 00:33:37,220 We plan to go to the city council on February 20th for a work session and then a public 547 00:33:37,220 --> 00:33:42,660 hearing with an effective date on March 1st. 548 00:33:42,660 --> 00:33:44,480 So a little bit of background on the criteria manuals. 549 00:33:44,480 --> 00:33:47,900 This was a pretty extensive update that we did this year. 550 00:33:47,900 --> 00:33:52,660 Previously we've had about four different criteria manuals. 551 00:33:52,660 --> 00:33:57,220 We added a fifth one this year with our street lights, so we had separate documents. 552 00:33:57,220 --> 00:34:02,260 We decided to roll those all into one document with different sections to cover different 553 00:34:02,260 --> 00:34:07,620 areas of the criteria manual, and that mirrors the DDC. 554 00:34:07,620 --> 00:34:10,580 It's one document that we have to update, one document to bring forward instead of five 555 00:34:10,580 --> 00:34:13,460 different documents we bring forward. 556 00:34:13,460 --> 00:34:17,900 What we've done in the past for our criteria manual updates is that we had the representatives 557 00:34:17,900 --> 00:34:21,500 of all city departments get together, we walked through every document, made sure that everybody 558 00:34:21,500 --> 00:34:23,300 was on board with it. 559 00:34:23,300 --> 00:34:28,660 That process worked pretty well, but it was very inefficient in terms of time of staff. 560 00:34:28,660 --> 00:34:30,620 And so this year we did a little bit different process. 561 00:34:30,620 --> 00:34:35,980 We identified key staff members, technical leads in every department, let them make their 562 00:34:35,980 --> 00:34:40,180 proposed changes, their proposed updates, kind of tackled what we knew we needed to 563 00:34:40,180 --> 00:34:41,180 change. 564 00:34:41,180 --> 00:34:45,660 And then once we had a document already into like a preliminary draft, then we brought 565 00:34:45,660 --> 00:34:50,440 all the city departments together, showed them what we'd done and say, "Hey, now provide 566 00:34:50,440 --> 00:34:51,440 us comments." 567 00:34:51,440 --> 00:34:56,060 We made it more efficient to have people comment on something instead of asking them to create 568 00:34:56,060 --> 00:34:57,060 something. 569 00:34:57,060 --> 00:35:00,980 So that was a little bit different process, and it seemed to work better because it was 570 00:35:00,980 --> 00:35:03,300 just quicker in terms of the time. 571 00:35:03,300 --> 00:35:08,460 And then once we had all those changes made in September, we sent it out for internal 572 00:35:08,460 --> 00:35:13,980 review from September and October and made further internal adjustments before we went 573 00:35:13,980 --> 00:35:17,220 out to post it online for public comment. 574 00:35:17,220 --> 00:35:21,800 We've done it online, we've posted the public hearing notice on the Denton Record Chronicle, 575 00:35:21,800 --> 00:35:27,300 and now we're presenting all the different boards and commissions and city council. 576 00:35:27,300 --> 00:35:31,680 So a little bit of history of the different documents the city has. 577 00:35:31,680 --> 00:35:36,740 We have the Denton Development Code, which sets the policies and the procedures of how 578 00:35:36,740 --> 00:35:39,900 land uses and how to develop within the city of Denton. 579 00:35:39,900 --> 00:35:43,540 The next level down, we have the criteria manuals, which provide the technical information 580 00:35:43,540 --> 00:35:49,180 and the design requirements to design, and the technical direction for projects in the 581 00:35:49,180 --> 00:35:50,180 city of Denton. 582 00:35:50,180 --> 00:35:55,660 And then we have the standard specifications and the standard details, which explain, "Okay, 583 00:35:55,660 --> 00:35:59,300 now that you have it designed, this is the materials you have to use. 584 00:35:59,300 --> 00:36:01,340 This is how you have to, you know, place the backfill. 585 00:36:01,340 --> 00:36:03,780 This is how you have to compact the roadway surface." 586 00:36:03,780 --> 00:36:07,900 And then the drawings show what the connections and how all those different templates are 587 00:36:07,900 --> 00:36:08,900 supposed to look like. 588 00:36:08,900 --> 00:36:13,740 And this is another kind of a show in the hierarchy of the different documents within 589 00:36:13,740 --> 00:36:14,740 the city. 590 00:36:14,740 --> 00:36:19,940 Development Code and everything references down to the lowest level during construction. 591 00:36:19,940 --> 00:36:22,980 So a little bit high level of some of the changes. 592 00:36:22,980 --> 00:36:27,540 For solid waste this year, we received -- they had a pretty extensive rewrite of their criteria 593 00:36:27,540 --> 00:36:28,940 manual a couple years ago. 594 00:36:28,940 --> 00:36:32,580 They received some comments on one of the tables was a little bit difficult to read 595 00:36:32,580 --> 00:36:36,040 and difficult to follow in terms of the enclosure requirements. 596 00:36:36,040 --> 00:36:41,060 So they received that feedback, made those changes, improved the table going forward. 597 00:36:41,060 --> 00:36:46,580 We've also provided some information on the routing of solid waste vehicles. 598 00:36:46,580 --> 00:36:49,140 The truck routing was discussed in the transportation criteria. 599 00:36:49,140 --> 00:36:53,540 It was not discussed in the solid waste criteria, so a lot of times it was missed. 600 00:36:53,540 --> 00:36:55,900 Require a 30-foot turn radius for the new trucks. 601 00:36:55,900 --> 00:37:00,340 Need a 50-foot clear space in front of the containers to allow the trucks to back in. 602 00:37:00,340 --> 00:37:02,620 You get the equipment and pull out. 603 00:37:02,620 --> 00:37:06,580 We also put in some requirements saying that you cannot park cars or place things in the 604 00:37:06,580 --> 00:37:07,640 swing gates. 605 00:37:07,640 --> 00:37:12,380 So yes, they had a clear space, but you can't open the gates because you had vehicles parked 606 00:37:12,380 --> 00:37:13,500 directly against the container. 607 00:37:13,500 --> 00:37:18,460 So we had to explicitly say you can't park here now. 608 00:37:18,460 --> 00:37:22,100 For the stormwater one, this is the one that we're kind of anticipating a little bit more 609 00:37:22,100 --> 00:37:27,660 of pushback from the development community is this first bullet point here, is that we 610 00:37:27,660 --> 00:37:29,180 are recommending this year. 611 00:37:29,180 --> 00:37:33,660 It's not a requirement and this puts us more in alignment with the current regulations 612 00:37:33,660 --> 00:37:35,540 within ice swim for the Metroplex. 613 00:37:35,540 --> 00:37:42,060 We're recommending that all stormwater runoff is treated to an 80 percent, 80 percent of 614 00:37:42,060 --> 00:37:46,500 the total suspended solids are captured and treated out of the stormwater runoff. 615 00:37:46,500 --> 00:37:53,260 We've been using that in the detention pond requirement, but it doesn't function that 616 00:37:53,260 --> 00:37:54,260 way. 617 00:37:54,260 --> 00:37:58,120 So we've been actually over-designing, over-sizing our detention ponds within the city. 618 00:37:58,120 --> 00:38:03,140 And this is a better way of actually enforcing the requirements of water quality. 619 00:38:03,140 --> 00:38:04,640 We've discussed it internally. 620 00:38:04,640 --> 00:38:09,140 We decided to do kind of a soft rollout, make it a recommendation this year, kind of get 621 00:38:09,140 --> 00:38:13,060 people used to this idea, then make it a requirement going forward. 622 00:38:13,060 --> 00:38:17,820 This is a two-part process or two-fold reasons for that because ice swim already discusses 623 00:38:17,820 --> 00:38:20,820 this and that we need to be doing, we should be doing this. 624 00:38:20,820 --> 00:38:28,060 They provide 28 different pre-designed mitigation solutions to actually treat this as the total 625 00:38:28,060 --> 00:38:33,340 suspended solids, and EPA is going to do an update where they're going to make this requirement 626 00:38:33,340 --> 00:38:34,340 going forward also. 627 00:38:34,340 --> 00:38:38,460 So in order for us to be in compliance with the EPA and our MS4 permit, we're going to 628 00:38:38,460 --> 00:38:40,540 be needing to treat water quality. 629 00:38:40,540 --> 00:38:41,540 Yes. 630 00:38:41,540 --> 00:38:50,620 I have a question that may be outside your scope, but what kind of processes are they 631 00:38:50,620 --> 00:38:55,740 or are you looking towards to treat stormwater runoff? 632 00:38:55,740 --> 00:39:03,420 So like I said, ice swim has about 28 different options, bioswales, filtration systems, you 633 00:39:03,420 --> 00:39:08,100 know, cartridge filter systems, something like that that will treat not just the volume 634 00:39:08,100 --> 00:39:11,980 of water, but actually take a lot of that sediment out of the water before it goes into 635 00:39:11,980 --> 00:39:13,860 the stormwater system. 636 00:39:13,860 --> 00:39:18,020 So like if you have like a grass area or like a drainage swale that allows the water to 637 00:39:18,020 --> 00:39:25,260 infiltrate into it, that material collects the solids or the silt or the clay and gets 638 00:39:25,260 --> 00:39:27,100 cleaner water out into the system. 639 00:39:27,100 --> 00:39:29,060 So who owns the stormwater facilities? 640 00:39:29,060 --> 00:39:31,180 Doesn't the city own them? 641 00:39:31,180 --> 00:39:35,340 That goes into our next bullet point. 642 00:39:35,340 --> 00:39:42,060 So currently a lot of the stormwater facilities, we have some public and we have some private. 643 00:39:42,060 --> 00:39:47,100 We don't have a good inventory of who owns what, and so we were actually putting in here 644 00:39:47,100 --> 00:39:51,380 a stormwater maintenance agreement where when a private development or private facility 645 00:39:51,380 --> 00:39:56,580 comes online, they sign an agreement with the city saying we own it, it's a type of 646 00:39:56,580 --> 00:40:02,460 this property, here's how we operate and maintain it, and it's a requirement for them to operate 647 00:40:02,460 --> 00:40:04,780 and maintain it where we can request records of it. 648 00:40:04,780 --> 00:40:08,820 If they're not operating and maintaining it appropriately, the city can come in and operate 649 00:40:08,820 --> 00:40:12,660 and maintain it, and then we're working on a mechanism to charge back to the property 650 00:40:12,660 --> 00:40:15,700 owners that we've had to maintain this for them. 651 00:40:15,700 --> 00:40:22,060 So this is being done in Fort Worth and other cities within the Metroplex. 652 00:40:22,060 --> 00:40:28,820 We use Fort Worth as a go-by, as in a good example, so we built it off of that, but that's 653 00:40:28,820 --> 00:40:30,340 coming forward. 654 00:40:30,340 --> 00:40:36,500 So what would be an example of a development here in Denton that they'd have their own 655 00:40:36,500 --> 00:40:38,940 private stormwater maintenance facilities? 656 00:40:38,940 --> 00:40:43,500 So a lot of detention ponds in the city of Denton are owned by HOAs, and HOAs don't know 657 00:40:43,500 --> 00:40:47,580 they own them, and so they're not properly maintaining them, so they have a lot of vegetation 658 00:40:47,580 --> 00:40:52,700 growth, they're getting infiltrated with sediment, they have debris in them, so when storm events 659 00:40:52,700 --> 00:40:58,620 happen, those detention ponds don't function and flood, create habitat for mosquitoes, 660 00:40:58,620 --> 00:41:03,180 things like that where they need to be maintaining those, and there's no mechanism for us to 661 00:41:03,180 --> 00:41:05,120 make them maintain them. 662 00:41:05,120 --> 00:41:10,260 We don't have right of entry a lot of times to access them ourselves, we have to do record 663 00:41:10,260 --> 00:41:14,980 research and what happens is that when a flood event happens, we get calls of city manager's 664 00:41:14,980 --> 00:41:20,020 office saying, "We're flooding, go fix it," but we don't know it's not the city's, but 665 00:41:20,020 --> 00:41:23,340 we go out and we fix it anyways, because that's what our obligation is. 666 00:41:23,340 --> 00:41:27,140 So we need to figure out, we need to create a process where we can say, "Hey, we came 667 00:41:27,140 --> 00:41:31,100 and fixed this for you guys in an event, we need you guys to help reverse the cost of 668 00:41:31,100 --> 00:41:34,140 the city that we've had to expend to maintain these structures for you." 669 00:41:34,140 --> 00:41:44,020 How are you going to monitor the stormwater runoff solids? 670 00:41:44,020 --> 00:41:46,140 It's done through the design process. 671 00:41:46,140 --> 00:41:51,700 So when they do the design calculations, it shows that what the percentage of the areas 672 00:41:51,700 --> 00:41:55,700 that are straining, as long as you put these mitigation measures in, you can calculate 673 00:41:55,700 --> 00:41:59,820 the runoff is, and then as long as we make sure that they're in construction that we 674 00:41:59,820 --> 00:42:04,420 need to do, we're going to be able to monitor that. 675 00:42:04,420 --> 00:42:08,060 I actually have an expert here from our watershed group. 676 00:42:08,060 --> 00:42:12,300 Christy Upton will be able to answer some of those questions. 677 00:42:12,300 --> 00:42:14,180 Christy Upton, Environmental Services. 678 00:42:14,180 --> 00:42:21,340 I'm the Environmental Compliance Coordinator and monitoring for stormwater runoff. 679 00:42:21,340 --> 00:42:31,660 So as Brett alluded to, the design process is the modeling or the idea of what this structure, 680 00:42:31,660 --> 00:42:36,380 how it will function and how much pollutant will be removed. 681 00:42:36,380 --> 00:42:47,100 The design is for sediment removal with the understanding, as the ice swim manual also 682 00:42:47,100 --> 00:42:51,220 discusses, along with sediment removal. 683 00:42:51,220 --> 00:42:55,420 Many of those pollutants of concern are also captured. 684 00:42:55,420 --> 00:43:01,980 So those designs are meant to capture other pollutants in addition to the sediment. 685 00:43:01,980 --> 00:43:07,140 So you're not really monitoring, you're doing that in the design phase. 686 00:43:07,140 --> 00:43:12,340 You're theoretically stopping the sediment runoff through the design phase. 687 00:43:12,340 --> 00:43:15,180 Pre-construction, yes. 688 00:43:15,180 --> 00:43:19,500 Post-construction, there's two monitoring tools. 689 00:43:19,500 --> 00:43:25,720 The first is to monitor for the function of the structure, which is why the maintenance 690 00:43:25,720 --> 00:43:34,340 agreements are necessary to put the onus on the property owners to monitor for the maintenance 691 00:43:34,340 --> 00:43:36,540 of those structures. 692 00:43:36,540 --> 00:43:47,420 But secondly, our stormwater team, the watershed protection group, they do have a monthly stormwater 693 00:43:47,420 --> 00:43:55,440 monitoring program, so there's monitoring sites across the city of Denton and they collect 694 00:43:55,440 --> 00:43:59,380 samples, they've been collecting samples for over 20 years. 695 00:43:59,380 --> 00:44:07,100 So we have trend data, we have knowledge about the quality of the stormwater coming off of 696 00:44:07,100 --> 00:44:12,900 our land and we continue to monitor for concerns. 697 00:44:12,900 --> 00:44:15,220 Is most of this complaint driven? 698 00:44:15,220 --> 00:44:22,380 No, we have specific sites across the city that we have been collecting for over 20 years. 699 00:44:22,380 --> 00:44:23,380 So we know those trends. 700 00:44:23,380 --> 00:44:29,300 But are those including the HOA run or the citizen-owned drainage systems as well? 701 00:44:29,300 --> 00:44:30,300 Correct. 702 00:44:30,300 --> 00:44:39,740 So these monitoring sites were chosen for access, for points of collection, so you'll 703 00:44:39,740 --> 00:44:42,100 have multiple streams coming together. 704 00:44:42,100 --> 00:44:50,460 So while it's a great tool for us to know the quality of what's coming off of our land, 705 00:44:50,460 --> 00:44:57,700 it's not a direct measurement of a specific facility and how well that specific facility 706 00:44:57,700 --> 00:44:58,860 is doing. 707 00:44:58,860 --> 00:45:03,900 But if they see something that's way off, it also can trigger for -- 708 00:45:03,900 --> 00:45:06,700 And then you start looking upstream at that point, yeah. 709 00:45:06,700 --> 00:45:07,700 Correct. 710 00:45:07,700 --> 00:45:08,700 All right. 711 00:45:08,700 --> 00:45:09,700 Thank you. 712 00:45:09,700 --> 00:45:10,700 You're welcome. 713 00:45:10,700 --> 00:45:15,860 Before you go, I have a question, it may not be in your bailiwick, but so we're collecting 714 00:45:15,860 --> 00:45:21,460 and stopping all this sediment from getting into the runoff, where does the sludge go? 715 00:45:21,460 --> 00:45:23,980 Good question. 716 00:45:23,980 --> 00:45:28,340 There's disposal rules on that. 717 00:45:28,340 --> 00:45:38,460 Most of it can go into your general landfill unless there was a reason for concern. 718 00:45:38,460 --> 00:45:43,820 But I think, for the most part, it's landfill. 719 00:45:43,820 --> 00:45:44,820 Thank you. 720 00:45:44,820 --> 00:45:45,820 All right. 721 00:45:45,820 --> 00:45:55,460 And one of the other big changes that we're looking at this year is that when a project 722 00:45:55,460 --> 00:45:59,740 develops a site, the site already naturally grades to different outfall points within 723 00:45:59,740 --> 00:46:01,080 the property. 724 00:46:01,080 --> 00:46:05,860 And so when a developer comes in and wants to come in and regrade the site, if they're 725 00:46:05,860 --> 00:46:10,420 going to divert water, say, from outfalling from the west side of the site to the east 726 00:46:10,420 --> 00:46:14,100 side of the site, require some additional diversion information and calculations to 727 00:46:14,100 --> 00:46:19,140 make sure that we're not over flooding the flood control structures or the storm drain 728 00:46:19,140 --> 00:46:20,980 system on that east side of the property. 729 00:46:20,980 --> 00:46:24,140 We want to make sure that -- because it's already designed to account for the way the 730 00:46:24,140 --> 00:46:28,380 flows go, so for changing it, we need to make sure that we're not causing any adverse impacts 731 00:46:28,380 --> 00:46:30,140 in that direction. 732 00:46:30,140 --> 00:46:34,540 And also, we actually added discussion as to what is considered an adverse impact or a 733 00:46:34,540 --> 00:46:35,660 downstream impact. 734 00:46:35,660 --> 00:46:38,340 And so it was never clearly defined. 735 00:46:38,340 --> 00:46:43,660 It says you can't cause adverse impacts downstream or adverse impacts on neighboring properties. 736 00:46:43,660 --> 00:46:45,460 It wasn't defined. 737 00:46:45,460 --> 00:46:48,860 That's a, you know, subjective term is what is adverse impacts. 738 00:46:48,860 --> 00:46:57,500 We actually had to define you cannot raise the flood level on a neighboring property. 739 00:46:57,500 --> 00:47:02,540 For the transportation criteria manual this year, we were shorthanded on staff for a transportation 740 00:47:02,540 --> 00:47:03,540 engineer. 741 00:47:03,540 --> 00:47:04,540 We actually did hire one. 742 00:47:04,540 --> 00:47:07,780 We have a new transportation services group, so they are going to be making more technical 743 00:47:07,780 --> 00:47:09,340 updates this year. 744 00:47:09,340 --> 00:47:13,580 The big change that we did is that we kept a lot of the technical the same, but we restructured 745 00:47:13,580 --> 00:47:15,300 the entire document. 746 00:47:15,300 --> 00:47:19,420 So before this document, I referred to it as kind of a Frankenstein document where everything 747 00:47:19,420 --> 00:47:22,940 was just added to the bottom if we needed something, was added to the bottom. 748 00:47:22,940 --> 00:47:26,780 And so this year, we reorganized it to make it flow coherently. 749 00:47:26,780 --> 00:47:30,260 When someone's designing or looking at it, it all makes sense in the order that you read 750 00:47:30,260 --> 00:47:32,740 it and you apply the criteria. 751 00:47:32,740 --> 00:47:38,540 Given the technical changes that we did make, we were actually made aware by a developer, 752 00:47:38,540 --> 00:47:42,540 a consultant engineer, that our profile grades did not make sense. 753 00:47:42,540 --> 00:47:47,660 So our roads are crowned, and then you transition up to the driveway up to the pad. 754 00:47:47,660 --> 00:47:52,580 Well, that transition from the crowned roadway to the driveway approach was not mathematically 755 00:47:52,580 --> 00:47:55,560 possible to meet and have a sidewalk, et cetera, on it. 756 00:47:55,560 --> 00:48:00,900 So we had to go back and reevaluate that and adjust that transition and fit in our technical 757 00:48:00,900 --> 00:48:03,460 documents. 758 00:48:03,460 --> 00:48:07,500 We've also added a Q&A analysis for gate entrances and drive-throughs to make sure that we're 759 00:48:07,500 --> 00:48:11,980 not stacking vehicles back into traffic or into travel lanes. 760 00:48:11,980 --> 00:48:17,980 We added, for the turn lane warrants, some factors to consider with its vehicles versus 761 00:48:17,980 --> 00:48:23,660 trucks versus the crash history versus the history of the intersection, how it's functioning. 762 00:48:23,660 --> 00:48:26,620 We had to outline all that because we were getting some pushback from the development 763 00:48:26,620 --> 00:48:30,700 community as to is the need for a turn lane warranted or not. 764 00:48:30,700 --> 00:48:36,560 And then we also added guidance on how to measure the distance from driveways to intersections. 765 00:48:36,560 --> 00:48:41,460 That was one that's engineering convention is different on this one. 766 00:48:41,460 --> 00:48:44,900 You measure from the center intersection to the driveway, from the back of the curb to 767 00:48:44,900 --> 00:48:48,180 the driveway, from the right-of-way line to the driveway. 768 00:48:48,180 --> 00:48:51,800 And so we discussed internally, and the best solution we came up with was from the back 769 00:48:51,800 --> 00:48:53,700 of the curb. 770 00:48:53,700 --> 00:48:57,620 Because if you're measuring from the center of the intersection, 50 feet to the driveway, 771 00:48:57,620 --> 00:49:01,180 what if you have an intersection that's got four lanes and a turn lane on it? 772 00:49:01,180 --> 00:49:05,460 Well, that 50 feet all of a sudden is now five feet at the back of the curb. 773 00:49:05,460 --> 00:49:08,100 If you measure from the right-of-way line, when you go out to the field, you don't know 774 00:49:08,100 --> 00:49:09,380 where the right-of-way line is. 775 00:49:09,380 --> 00:49:11,760 You might have an easement, you might have utilities. 776 00:49:11,760 --> 00:49:17,280 So back of the curb is an actual physical device or barrier that you can measure from 777 00:49:17,280 --> 00:49:19,380 to the nearest driveway. 778 00:49:19,380 --> 00:49:23,460 So that's what the direction we decided to go with. 779 00:49:23,460 --> 00:49:30,660 For the water/wastewater updates, we prohibit the use of installing manholes, grates, et 780 00:49:30,660 --> 00:49:34,820 cetera, in sidewalks, ramps, and driveways. 781 00:49:34,820 --> 00:49:39,500 The reason that is that they're not ADA-approved devices or surfaces, and if you have to service 782 00:49:39,500 --> 00:49:41,580 those manholes, you have to open them up. 783 00:49:41,580 --> 00:49:44,900 Now you're blocking the sidewalk, you're blocking the driveway, you're taking the curb ramp 784 00:49:44,900 --> 00:49:45,900 out of service. 785 00:49:45,900 --> 00:49:50,260 So we need to have those off of those facilities so we can access them and not obstruct the 786 00:49:50,260 --> 00:49:53,880 flow of people or of traffic or people. 787 00:49:53,880 --> 00:49:57,620 We provided some additional guidance on the sizing of water meters. 788 00:49:57,620 --> 00:50:02,220 Our water department had some confusion or concern with developers not knowing what size 789 00:50:02,220 --> 00:50:08,180 meters to order, so we clarified that table and adjusted to make sure it's more clear. 790 00:50:08,180 --> 00:50:13,420 We wanted a five-foot minimum separation from our sewer manholes and any other utility line, 791 00:50:13,420 --> 00:50:15,620 so that way if we ever need to service the manhole, we can. 792 00:50:15,620 --> 00:50:20,220 We don't have to relocate the utility that's adjacent to it to access the manhole and serve 793 00:50:20,220 --> 00:50:24,540 us that manhole if we need to tap into it or repair it for any reason. 794 00:50:24,540 --> 00:50:28,580 And then we also asked our lift stations to be designed to 100-year flood protection instead 795 00:50:28,580 --> 00:50:31,420 of a 25-year flood protection. 796 00:50:31,420 --> 00:50:33,660 Lift stations are considered critical infrastructure. 797 00:50:33,660 --> 00:50:37,740 If they go down during the flood event, we have a serious issue. 798 00:50:37,740 --> 00:50:44,100 Part of our FEMA community rating system is that we recommended that all critical infrastructures 799 00:50:44,100 --> 00:50:48,620 be protected against 100-year flood, so this is putting us in compliance with the recommendations 800 00:50:48,620 --> 00:50:57,140 from FEMA saying that we want to protect our city and prevent the flood risk. 801 00:50:57,140 --> 00:51:01,260 So for the street light design criteria, this was actually adopted in, I want to say, late 802 00:51:01,260 --> 00:51:02,260 October. 803 00:51:02,260 --> 00:51:03,940 It was a new criteria manual. 804 00:51:03,940 --> 00:51:04,940 We didn't make any changes. 805 00:51:04,940 --> 00:51:09,660 We made, I think, very slight changes, just some wording changes to it, but the big thing 806 00:51:09,660 --> 00:51:15,320 is that we just added it to this document, so that way it's all cohesive into one document. 807 00:51:15,320 --> 00:51:20,200 One of the highlights of it is that we require lighting studies done on all streets except 808 00:51:20,200 --> 00:51:24,700 for local residential roadways with a 30-mile-per-hour or less speed limit. 809 00:51:24,700 --> 00:51:29,620 We require lighting to be spaced every 30 feet or over 250 feet for those residential 810 00:51:29,620 --> 00:51:35,420 roads, and that we also put lighting requirements for intersections, cul-de-sacs, railroad crossings, 811 00:51:35,420 --> 00:51:36,420 et cetera. 812 00:51:36,420 --> 00:51:41,980 And the manual also outlines what are approved lumineers, hardware, poles, provides a list 813 00:51:41,980 --> 00:51:42,980 of those. 814 00:51:42,980 --> 00:51:43,980 That's what staff keeps on hand. 815 00:51:43,980 --> 00:51:47,620 That's what staff knows how to operate and maintain, so we have all that listed out within 816 00:51:47,620 --> 00:51:52,900 the criteria manual. 817 00:51:52,900 --> 00:51:58,580 So for the -- the last thing that we added was an official design deviation section to 818 00:51:58,580 --> 00:52:00,620 the criteria manual. 819 00:52:00,620 --> 00:52:06,380 There's always been a variance procedure or a deviation procedure from the criteria manual. 820 00:52:06,380 --> 00:52:09,500 It's been informal, it's been kind of administrative. 821 00:52:09,500 --> 00:52:14,100 This outlines the steps, the requirements to -- if a designer or developer is unable 822 00:52:14,100 --> 00:52:19,900 to meet the criteria within the document, a process to change the design or do different 823 00:52:19,900 --> 00:52:26,300 criteria, provide a document in there, a form for them to fill out, and justification for 824 00:52:26,300 --> 00:52:27,300 it. 825 00:52:27,300 --> 00:52:31,860 It needs to be demonstrated on the hardship of the site, physical characteristics, something 826 00:52:31,860 --> 00:52:35,860 that they -- that they don't have a control over cannot be a deviation because something 827 00:52:35,860 --> 00:52:40,220 is expensive or hard, it's -- this is what the city needs to protect its infrastructure 828 00:52:40,220 --> 00:52:41,340 and for the residents. 829 00:52:41,340 --> 00:52:47,700 It cannot be a life safety issue that we want to get around, so we have a criteria for that. 830 00:52:47,700 --> 00:52:52,740 And then those deviations go to the technical experts in the different fields to review, 831 00:52:52,740 --> 00:52:57,020 evaluate, and make a recommendation if they need to be -- if they approve it or they disagree 832 00:52:57,020 --> 00:52:58,620 with that deviation. 833 00:52:58,620 --> 00:53:02,140 And then if they do disagree with it, it gives some language saying, okay, well, you can 834 00:53:02,140 --> 00:53:06,980 resubmit additional information, you can have a meeting to kind of explain the case and 835 00:53:06,980 --> 00:53:14,300 kind of go through the process of evaluating that further. 836 00:53:14,300 --> 00:53:19,500 So next steps, after today, we plan to go to city council for a work session at a public 837 00:53:19,500 --> 00:53:25,060 hearing and a proposed adoption on February 20th and with an effective date on March 1st. 838 00:53:25,060 --> 00:53:30,100 And again, kind of the overall public outreach plan that we've gone through. 839 00:53:30,100 --> 00:53:34,460 And if you have any questions, myself and all of our technical experts are here to answer 840 00:53:34,460 --> 00:53:35,460 them. 841 00:53:35,460 --> 00:53:36,460 >> Okay. 842 00:53:36,460 --> 00:53:37,460 Questions? 843 00:53:37,460 --> 00:53:38,460 >> I have -- 844 00:53:38,460 --> 00:53:39,460 >> Let's do a ride back. 845 00:53:39,460 --> 00:53:40,460 I'm just so -- 846 00:53:40,460 --> 00:53:41,460 >> Sorry. 847 00:53:41,460 --> 00:53:42,460 [laughter] 848 00:53:42,460 --> 00:53:52,580 >> My first question is, you had a meeting with area engineering firms, personnel. 849 00:53:52,580 --> 00:53:57,540 Did you receive significant feedback from the engineering community during the public 850 00:53:57,540 --> 00:53:59,900 review comments? 851 00:53:59,900 --> 00:54:07,040 >> We actually posted a form online, a comment response form so we can receive comments. 852 00:54:07,040 --> 00:54:11,780 We have received a few, I don't remember exactly how many, a lot of -- excuse me, a lot of 853 00:54:11,780 --> 00:54:17,660 the comments that we received is actually from internal staff from what they've seen. 854 00:54:17,660 --> 00:54:21,980 It's a combination of what do we see in terms of the design variances or deviations that 855 00:54:21,980 --> 00:54:27,420 we need to address receiving frequency of these ones or the comments that the staff 856 00:54:27,420 --> 00:54:31,980 receives from developers that they're saying, "Oh, we're having a hard time meeting this. 857 00:54:31,980 --> 00:54:32,980 This is a challenge. 858 00:54:32,980 --> 00:54:34,980 This is not what the industry standard is." 859 00:54:34,980 --> 00:54:37,660 So a lot of the comments come internally. 860 00:54:37,660 --> 00:54:42,500 We have received a few from external, and we do our best to address those. 861 00:54:42,500 --> 00:54:48,980 >> Well, I'm disappointed in my engineering brethren in that case, because it seems to 862 00:54:48,980 --> 00:54:55,780 me that although all this standardization and confirmation, you know, conforming with other 863 00:54:55,780 --> 00:55:01,180 upcoming standards is probably prudent, it seems to me we're adding a lot of cost to 864 00:55:01,180 --> 00:55:05,900 development and those costs are going to affect the private sector, but they're also going 865 00:55:05,900 --> 00:55:08,260 to affect future city projects. 866 00:55:08,260 --> 00:55:16,740 Has there been any kind of cost trade-off risk assessment of these changes? 867 00:55:16,740 --> 00:55:21,460 >> There has been some of the feedback we've received is that we've done a lot of updates 868 00:55:21,460 --> 00:55:27,740 real frequently, and so our goal is to get this document to a point where we're comfortable 869 00:55:27,740 --> 00:55:31,660 with it and not touch it for about five years, because we've gotten a lot of feedback that 870 00:55:31,660 --> 00:55:34,540 they don't know -- the criteria is constantly changing. 871 00:55:34,540 --> 00:55:37,500 We don't know what criteria may know the full -- to follow. 872 00:55:37,500 --> 00:55:38,660 We can't estimate the cost. 873 00:55:38,660 --> 00:55:42,700 We can't figure out how to apply these, because we're changing them yearly. 874 00:55:42,700 --> 00:55:48,860 Well, when I got here two years ago, it was the first time they were updated since 2008, 875 00:55:48,860 --> 00:55:53,940 so there are a long time in between updates, and now we're trying to get ourselves up to 876 00:55:53,940 --> 00:56:00,620 current standards in a reasonable time, and it's just between staff demands and timing, 877 00:56:00,620 --> 00:56:03,140 it's hard for us to get these updates done in one go. 878 00:56:03,140 --> 00:56:06,580 So we're doing this kind of incremental approach, and then once we get it out to a certain point, 879 00:56:06,580 --> 00:56:11,700 we want to leave it alone, let the industry kind of get used to this as the standard for 880 00:56:11,700 --> 00:56:12,700 them. 881 00:56:12,700 --> 00:56:13,700 >> Absorb it, so to speak. 882 00:56:13,700 --> 00:56:14,700 >> Yeah. 883 00:56:14,700 --> 00:56:17,700 >> Well, I serve on a standards committee, so I am familiar with this problem. 884 00:56:17,700 --> 00:56:18,700 >> Yes. 885 00:56:18,700 --> 00:56:23,980 >> I was wondering, is there some way we can get some kind of cost trade-off analysis on 886 00:56:23,980 --> 00:56:26,940 some of these changes? 887 00:56:26,940 --> 00:56:27,940 >> We can look into it. 888 00:56:27,940 --> 00:56:28,940 We can ask the developers. 889 00:56:28,940 --> 00:56:37,140 The changes that we're seeing on the design side are not super impactful from capital project 890 00:56:37,140 --> 00:56:39,340 side or internal engineering design, because it's -- 891 00:56:39,340 --> 00:56:44,060 >> Well, let's see, Mike, for instance, the lighting, you made, I think, some pretty good 892 00:56:44,060 --> 00:56:48,540 changes to the lighting requirements for street lighting, but there's going to be cost impact 893 00:56:48,540 --> 00:56:50,960 to that, and they'll primarily be felt by the city. 894 00:56:50,960 --> 00:56:55,940 >> It's going to be felt by the city, either through the contracts with the developments 895 00:56:55,940 --> 00:56:58,940 coming in or felt by the city to actually have to install them themselves, because we're 896 00:56:58,940 --> 00:57:03,620 having to go back and retrofit the lighting in a lot of locations and change the lighting 897 00:57:03,620 --> 00:57:05,860 or add lighting ourselves for internal city costs. 898 00:57:05,860 --> 00:57:09,060 So the cost is getting applied to the city one way or the other, unfortunately. 899 00:57:09,060 --> 00:57:10,060 >> Okay. 900 00:57:10,060 --> 00:57:11,060 Well, I understand that. 901 00:57:11,060 --> 00:57:14,180 I'm just saying it looks to me like you're creating some cost issues. 902 00:57:14,180 --> 00:57:18,500 I don't see any consideration of the cost risk tradeoff. 903 00:57:18,500 --> 00:57:21,400 Is there some way that we can get some feedback on that? 904 00:57:21,400 --> 00:57:25,100 >> I can definitely speak with staff and see if we can get some feedback on that, yes. 905 00:57:25,100 --> 00:57:26,100 >> Thank you. 906 00:57:26,100 --> 00:57:27,100 >> So I think -- 907 00:57:27,100 --> 00:57:28,100 >> Go ahead. 908 00:57:28,100 --> 00:57:32,940 >> I'm just -- I'm trying to understand with the cost evaluation. 909 00:57:32,940 --> 00:57:39,700 So the criteria manual implements code and policies set by city council. 910 00:57:39,700 --> 00:57:50,940 So the cost of city council not having elected to have, you know, features in the neighborhoods 911 00:57:50,940 --> 00:57:53,580 required by policy or code. 912 00:57:53,580 --> 00:57:54,580 Is that -- 913 00:57:54,580 --> 00:57:57,460 >> Are you asking me or him? 914 00:57:57,460 --> 00:57:59,420 >> Well, I'm just trying to understand. 915 00:57:59,420 --> 00:58:05,260 I want to make a cost benefit analysis of not requiring street lights or not requiring 916 00:58:05,260 --> 00:58:06,260 storm water detention. 917 00:58:06,260 --> 00:58:11,740 >> We're increasing the number of street lights in the requirement or increasing the frequency, 918 00:58:11,740 --> 00:58:16,020 additional locations that we have in our current design requirements. 919 00:58:16,020 --> 00:58:17,020 That's kind of what I was thinking. 920 00:58:17,020 --> 00:58:22,260 So if we're asking for more and we're asking for better, more and better costs more money. 921 00:58:22,260 --> 00:58:25,900 So that's going to cost the city more money because primarily the city is responsible 922 00:58:25,900 --> 00:58:27,940 for the street lighting. 923 00:58:27,940 --> 00:58:30,900 >> Just a quick question just for clarification, Ali. 924 00:58:30,900 --> 00:58:35,980 Is this just specific to street lighting or just kind of a general across all the criteria 925 00:58:35,980 --> 00:58:36,980 manuals? 926 00:58:36,980 --> 00:58:42,060 >> Since there's a sweeping review and standardization and modernization, the whole design criteria 927 00:58:42,060 --> 00:58:43,060 manual. 928 00:58:43,060 --> 00:58:44,060 >> Okay. 929 00:58:44,060 --> 00:58:49,420 Yeah, we can certainly put together a cost impact analysis for the changes on the street 930 00:58:49,420 --> 00:58:50,420 lights. 931 00:58:50,420 --> 00:58:53,900 I mean, if it's going to take 10 more street lights, we know what the cost is of that based 932 00:58:53,900 --> 00:58:55,100 on the criteria manual. 933 00:58:55,100 --> 00:58:56,100 So we can certainly do that. 934 00:58:56,100 --> 00:58:59,140 I just want to clarify that this was across the board for all the changes. 935 00:58:59,140 --> 00:59:02,620 >> I just picked on the lighting because I thought it was the simplest and most straightforward. 936 00:59:02,620 --> 00:59:03,620 >> Correct. 937 00:59:03,620 --> 00:59:04,620 Okay. 938 00:59:04,620 --> 00:59:09,340 >> So if you go ahead and you went years ago in the 2008 version, we changed our drainage 939 00:59:09,340 --> 00:59:10,340 plans completely. 940 00:59:10,340 --> 00:59:16,460 I mean, we went from 100-year floodplain to a 500-year floodplain design, I believe is 941 00:59:16,460 --> 00:59:17,820 how it went. 942 00:59:17,820 --> 00:59:22,100 And I called up King Arthur and he didn't remember exactly what the floods were that 943 00:59:22,100 --> 00:59:23,100 year. 944 00:59:23,100 --> 00:59:26,180 So Camelot, you know, is the reference. 945 00:59:26,180 --> 00:59:27,180 >> That was a joke. 946 00:59:27,180 --> 00:59:28,180 >> Anyway, yeah. 947 00:59:28,180 --> 00:59:29,900 So it's all theoretical anyway. 948 00:59:29,900 --> 00:59:33,700 But yeah, I remember that was a huge change in cost to developers. 949 00:59:33,700 --> 00:59:39,900 Not that it wasn't necessary, but it was an issue in the middle of designs and the criteria 950 00:59:39,900 --> 00:59:40,900 change. 951 00:59:40,900 --> 00:59:45,620 And so they came in and asked for -- to use the existing when they filed. 952 00:59:45,620 --> 00:59:50,180 But anyway, I think that's more what I would think was going to cost a heck of a lot more. 953 00:59:50,180 --> 00:59:51,180 >> Yeah, the development. 954 00:59:51,180 --> 00:59:54,300 And you've met with the development community and you have their feedback. 955 00:59:54,300 --> 00:59:55,300 >> Correct. 956 00:59:55,300 --> 00:59:56,300 >> Okay. 957 00:59:56,300 --> 01:00:01,780 >> Yeah, and the big change I think last year we saw was that we were -- all the designs 958 01:00:01,780 --> 01:00:06,180 seem to be a 100-year flood event for storm drain design. 959 01:00:06,180 --> 01:00:10,700 But we've received comments and feedback from the community that -- and we know internally 960 01:00:10,700 --> 01:00:17,300 that that's a big lift for projects to do, especially in-field projects that are redeveloping 961 01:00:17,300 --> 01:00:24,180 in downtown or areas where they're now tying into an existing storm drain system. 962 01:00:24,180 --> 01:00:28,580 And to have them to design to 100-year, okay, great, they can put 100-year in, but they 963 01:00:28,580 --> 01:00:32,580 have to chase that storm drain system down to where it no longer has an impact, which 964 01:00:32,580 --> 01:00:35,460 might be down to Lake Louisville, and that's not realistic. 965 01:00:35,460 --> 01:00:41,740 So we provided provisions last year to allow -- to design to a smaller storm event knowing 966 01:00:41,740 --> 01:00:47,060 that incremental improvement is better than no improvement and trying to balance the cost 967 01:00:47,060 --> 01:00:51,580 of the incremental improvement versus -- no improvement versus the improvement that we 968 01:00:51,580 --> 01:00:52,580 want. 969 01:00:52,580 --> 01:00:56,180 So we've already kind of built that in last year's updates. 970 01:00:56,180 --> 01:00:58,740 Other questions? 971 01:00:58,740 --> 01:01:04,980 Just -- you kind of answered it just a bit about the development community, but did -- you 972 01:01:04,980 --> 01:01:09,820 did have -- did you have any input out there that just came in and y'all had aha moments 973 01:01:09,820 --> 01:01:15,940 -- oh, we didn't catch that or we didn't think of -- I mean, that -- it's got to happen, 974 01:01:15,940 --> 01:01:16,940 right? 975 01:01:16,940 --> 01:01:21,420 The one that had that was the driveway -- the transition from the roadway to the driveway. 976 01:01:21,420 --> 01:01:23,220 So we actually had a development come in. 977 01:01:23,220 --> 01:01:28,260 It was a green field development, and they were asking for a variance or deviation to 978 01:01:28,260 --> 01:01:32,140 the transition, and we're like, it's a flat lot. 979 01:01:32,140 --> 01:01:34,020 You don't need a variance for this. 980 01:01:34,020 --> 01:01:35,020 Just design it appropriately. 981 01:01:35,020 --> 01:01:38,300 So we kind of went back and forth with them, and they're like, no, you don't understand. 982 01:01:38,300 --> 01:01:41,740 We can't design it, and we're like, explain it to us. 983 01:01:41,740 --> 01:01:46,900 We actually got into a meeting with them and drew it up and ran the math, ran a traverse 984 01:01:46,900 --> 01:01:51,140 of the site around in a circle and said, we mathematically -- you mathematically cannot 985 01:01:51,140 --> 01:01:53,700 meet these grades that you're asking for in your criteria manual. 986 01:01:53,700 --> 01:01:56,420 I was like, holy smokes, how long have we had this? 987 01:01:56,420 --> 01:01:59,980 And he basically outlined and said, every development that's come in since you've had 988 01:01:59,980 --> 01:02:02,180 this has not met your standard. 989 01:02:02,180 --> 01:02:05,580 You either have to ask for a deviation or they've built it incorrectly and not told 990 01:02:05,580 --> 01:02:06,860 you about it. 991 01:02:06,860 --> 01:02:07,860 And so -- 992 01:02:07,860 --> 01:02:08,860 >> Or not got caught. 993 01:02:08,860 --> 01:02:09,860 >> Or not got caught. 994 01:02:09,860 --> 01:02:10,860 Exactly. 995 01:02:10,860 --> 01:02:13,540 So we kind of had to go back and go, when do we make this change? 996 01:02:13,540 --> 01:02:15,020 Why do we make this change? 997 01:02:15,020 --> 01:02:18,700 And then what are other agencies or what is the recommendation we should go going forward? 998 01:02:18,700 --> 01:02:21,580 So we addressed that this year and corrected that. 999 01:02:21,580 --> 01:02:27,060 >> I know that I've been involved with developments where, you know, the goal is to follow the 1000 01:02:27,060 --> 01:02:31,900 existing grade, whatever possible, right, and then design the rods around them. 1001 01:02:31,900 --> 01:02:37,580 And so in doing that, you end up having slopes like this and slopes like that all over the 1002 01:02:37,580 --> 01:02:42,100 place, which are not good design, obviously, for a home. 1003 01:02:42,100 --> 01:02:47,140 We're not responsible for everybody's home, don't get me wrong, but just comment on that. 1004 01:02:47,140 --> 01:02:51,420 I know drainage is a huge issue, and I'm glad to hear that somebody actually came up with 1005 01:02:51,420 --> 01:02:55,580 some good ideas from the outside, because that's important. 1006 01:02:55,580 --> 01:02:58,020 >> So the next step is public hearing. 1007 01:02:58,020 --> 01:03:01,380 >> Next step is that we're going to present this presentation or a very similar version 1008 01:03:01,380 --> 01:03:06,060 of it to City Council on the 20th, February 20th, and then that night, open up the public 1009 01:03:06,060 --> 01:03:12,460 hearing and propose these documents for adoption or this new document for adoption. 1010 01:03:12,460 --> 01:03:15,620 >> Do you have what you need from us? 1011 01:03:15,620 --> 01:03:16,620 >> Yes. 1012 01:03:16,620 --> 01:03:17,620 Thank you very much. 1013 01:03:17,620 --> 01:03:18,620 >> Thank you. 1014 01:03:18,620 --> 01:03:19,620 All right. 1015 01:03:19,620 --> 01:03:20,620 It is 10.03. 1016 01:03:20,620 --> 01:03:23,620 Do we have a motion to adjourn? 1017 01:03:23,620 --> 01:03:24,260 >> Absolutely.