WEBVTT

00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:09.800
 Good evening and welcome to the Thursday, December 13th, 2018, Traffic Safety Commission

00:00:09.800 --> 00:00:10.800
 meeting.

00:00:10.800 --> 00:00:15.480
 It is 533 and we do have a quorum.

00:00:15.480 --> 00:00:20.160
 The first item on our agenda is presentations from members of the public.

00:00:20.160 --> 00:00:25.400
 At this point, anybody from the public can make comments.

00:00:25.400 --> 00:00:27.880
 You have up to four minutes.

00:00:27.880 --> 00:00:32.020
 And is there anybody who wants to make public comment?

00:00:32.020 --> 00:00:33.020
 Hello.

00:00:33.020 --> 00:00:34.020
 Okay.

00:00:34.020 --> 00:00:35.020
 Thank you.

00:00:35.020 --> 00:00:36.020
 The previous agenda item that I'd like to ask about, I have no idea what it is, but

00:00:36.020 --> 00:00:37.020
 it's a question that's been raised a lot, and I'm not sure what it is, but I think it's

00:00:37.020 --> 00:00:38.020
 a good question.

00:00:38.020 --> 00:00:39.020
 It's a question that's been raised a lot.

00:00:39.020 --> 00:00:40.020
 It's a question that's been raised a lot.

00:00:40.020 --> 00:00:41.020
 It's a question that's been raised a lot.

00:00:41.020 --> 00:00:42.020
 It's a question that's been raised a lot.

00:00:42.020 --> 00:00:43.020
 It's a question that's been raised a lot.

00:00:43.020 --> 00:00:44.020
 It's a question that's been raised a lot.

00:00:44.020 --> 00:00:45.020
 It's a question that's been raised a lot.

00:00:45.020 --> 00:00:46.020
 It's a question that's been raised a lot.

00:00:46.020 --> 00:00:47.020
 It's a question that's been raised a lot.

00:00:47.020 --> 00:00:48.020
 It's a question that's been raised a lot.

00:00:48.020 --> 00:00:59.240
 It's a question that's been raised a lot.

00:00:59.240 --> 00:01:00.240
 It's a question that's been raised a lot.

00:01:00.240 --> 00:01:01.240
 It's a question that's been raised a lot.

00:01:01.240 --> 00:01:02.240
 It's a question that's been raised a lot.

00:01:02.240 --> 00:01:03.240
 It's a question that's been raised a lot.

00:01:03.240 --> 00:01:04.240
 It's a question that's been raised a lot.

00:01:04.240 --> 00:01:05.240
 It's a question that's been raised a lot.

00:01:05.240 --> 00:01:06.240
 It's a question that's been raised a lot.

00:01:06.240 --> 00:01:07.240
 It's a question that's been raised a lot.

00:01:07.240 --> 00:01:08.240
 It's a question that's been raised a lot.

00:01:08.240 --> 00:01:09.240
 It's a question that's been raised a lot.

00:01:09.240 --> 00:01:10.240
 It's a question that's been raised a lot.

00:01:10.240 --> 00:01:11.240
 It's a question that's been raised a lot.

00:01:11.240 --> 00:01:12.240
 It's a question that's been raised a lot.

00:01:12.240 --> 00:01:13.240
 It's a question that's been raised a lot.

00:01:13.240 --> 00:01:14.240
 It's a question that's been raised a lot.

00:01:14.240 --> 00:01:20.240
 It's a question that's been raised a lot.

00:01:20.240 --> 00:01:25.240
 It's a question that's been raised a lot.

00:01:25.240 --> 00:01:31.240
 It's a question that's been raised a lot.

00:01:31.240 --> 00:01:36.240
 It's a question that's been raised a lot.

00:01:36.240 --> 00:01:41.240
 It's a question that's been raised a lot.

00:01:41.240 --> 00:01:47.240
 It's a question that's been raised a lot.

00:01:47.240 --> 00:01:52.240
 It's a question that's been raised a lot.

00:01:52.240 --> 00:01:57.240
 It's a question that's been raised a lot.

00:01:57.240 --> 00:02:02.240
 It's a question that's been raised a lot.

00:02:02.240 --> 00:02:07.240
 It's a question that's been raised a lot.

00:02:07.240 --> 00:02:12.240
 It's a question that's been raised a lot.

00:02:12.240 --> 00:02:17.240
 It's a question that's been raised a lot.

00:02:17.240 --> 00:02:22.240
 It's a question that's been raised a lot.

00:02:22.240 --> 00:02:27.240
 It's a question that's been raised a lot.

00:02:27.240 --> 00:02:32.240
 It's a question that's been raised a lot.

00:02:32.240 --> 00:02:37.240
 It's a question that's been raised a lot.

00:02:37.240 --> 00:02:42.240
 It's a question that's been raised a lot.

00:02:42.240 --> 00:02:47.240
 It's a question that's been raised a lot.

00:02:47.240 --> 00:02:52.240
 It's a question that's been raised a lot.

00:02:52.240 --> 00:02:57.240
 It's a question that's been raised a lot.

00:02:57.240 --> 00:03:02.240
 It's a question that's been raised a lot.

00:03:02.240 --> 00:03:07.240
 It's a question that's been raised a lot.

00:03:07.240 --> 00:03:12.240
 It's a question that's been raised a lot.

00:03:12.240 --> 00:03:17.240
 It's a question that's been raised a lot.

00:03:17.240 --> 00:03:22.240
 It's a question that's been raised a lot.

00:03:22.240 --> 00:03:27.240
 It's a question that's been raised a lot.

00:03:27.240 --> 00:03:32.240
 It's a question that's been raised a lot.

00:03:32.240 --> 00:03:37.240
 It's a question that's been raised a lot.

00:03:37.240 --> 00:03:42.240
 It's a question that's been raised a lot.

00:03:42.240 --> 00:03:47.240
 It's a question that's been raised a lot.

00:03:47.240 --> 00:03:52.240
 It's a question that's been raised a lot.

00:03:52.240 --> 00:03:57.240
 It's a question that's been raised a lot.

00:03:57.240 --> 00:04:02.240
 It's a question that's been raised a lot.

00:04:02.240 --> 00:04:07.240
 It's a question that's been raised a lot.

00:04:07.240 --> 00:04:17.240
 It's a question that's been raised a lot.

00:04:17.240 --> 00:04:22.240
 It's a question that's been raised a lot.

00:04:22.240 --> 00:04:27.240
 It's a question that's been raised a lot.

00:04:27.240 --> 00:04:32.240
 It's a question that's been raised a lot.

00:04:32.240 --> 00:04:37.240
 It's a question that's been raised a lot.

00:04:37.240 --> 00:04:42.240
 It's a question that's been raised a lot.

00:04:42.240 --> 00:04:47.240
 It's a question that's been raised a lot.

00:04:47.240 --> 00:04:52.240
 It's a question that's been raised a lot.

00:04:52.240 --> 00:04:57.240
 It's a question that's been raised a lot.

00:04:57.240 --> 00:05:02.240
 It's a question that's been raised a lot.

00:05:02.240 --> 00:05:07.240
 It's a question that's been raised a lot.

00:05:07.240 --> 00:05:12.240
 It's a question that's been raised a lot.

00:05:12.240 --> 00:05:17.240
 It's a question that's been raised a lot.

00:05:17.240 --> 00:05:22.240
 It's a question that's been raised a lot.

00:05:22.240 --> 00:05:27.240
 It's a question that's been raised a lot.

00:05:27.240 --> 00:05:32.240
 It's a question that's been raised a lot.

00:05:32.240 --> 00:05:37.240
 It's a question that's been raised a lot.

00:05:37.240 --> 00:05:42.240
 It's a question that's been raised a lot.

00:05:42.240 --> 00:05:47.240
 It's a question that's been raised a lot.

00:05:47.240 --> 00:05:52.240
 It's a question that's been raised a lot.

00:05:52.240 --> 00:05:57.240
 It's a question that's been raised a lot.

00:05:57.240 --> 00:06:02.240
 It's a question that's been raised a lot.

00:06:02.240 --> 00:06:07.240
 It's a question that's been raised a lot.

00:06:07.240 --> 00:06:12.240
 It's a question that's been raised a lot.

00:06:12.240 --> 00:06:17.240
 It's a question that's been raised a lot.

00:06:17.240 --> 00:06:22.240
 It's a question that's been raised a lot.

00:06:22.240 --> 00:06:27.240
 It's a question that's been raised a lot.

00:06:27.240 --> 00:06:32.240
 It's a question that's been raised a lot.

00:06:32.240 --> 00:06:37.240
 It's a question that's been raised a lot.

00:06:37.240 --> 00:06:42.240
 It's a question that's been raised a lot.

00:06:42.240 --> 00:06:47.240
 It's a question that's been raised a lot.

00:06:47.240 --> 00:06:52.240
 It's a question that's been raised a lot.

00:06:52.240 --> 00:06:57.240
 It's a question that's been raised a lot.

00:06:57.240 --> 00:07:02.240
 It's a question that's been raised a lot.

00:07:02.240 --> 00:07:07.240
 It's a question that's been raised a lot.

00:07:07.240 --> 00:07:12.240
 It's a question that's been raised a lot.

00:07:12.240 --> 00:07:17.240
 It's a question that's been raised a lot.

00:07:17.240 --> 00:07:22.240
 It's a question that's been raised a lot.

00:07:22.240 --> 00:07:27.240
 It's a question that's been raised a lot.

00:07:27.240 --> 00:07:32.240
 It's a question that's been raised a lot.

00:07:32.240 --> 00:07:37.240
 It's a question that's been raised a lot.

00:07:37.240 --> 00:07:42.240
 It's a question that's been raised a lot.

00:07:42.240 --> 00:07:47.240
 It's a question that's been raised a lot.

00:07:47.240 --> 00:07:52.240
 It's a question that's been raised a lot.

00:07:52.240 --> 00:07:57.240
 >> Good evening.

00:07:57.240 --> 00:08:00.240
 Thank you, Chair, Commissioners.

00:08:00.240 --> 00:08:08.240
 I wanted to give you a little bit of background, start with saying that our meeting, this particular meeting, is typically the first Monday of the month.

00:08:08.240 --> 00:08:20.240
 And it was moved because we were having a joint meeting between the city, the mayor, and TW, the chancellor of TW.

00:08:20.240 --> 00:08:33.240
 And we were holding these, not necessarily quarterly, but every other month, every month, depending on how much information we have, to start a collaborative effort similar to what we've started with UNT.

00:08:33.240 --> 00:08:41.240
 And as part of that first meeting, there was interest from TW to look at what happens with a closure.

00:08:41.240 --> 00:08:47.240
 What are their master plans say and what are we as a city required?

00:08:47.240 --> 00:08:57.240
 So we started down that path and we had a meeting a week and a half ago, the first week of December, with TW staff.

00:08:57.240 --> 00:09:01.240
 And this is the presentation that was done on December 6th.

00:09:01.240 --> 00:09:06.240
 And that's why this meeting was moved forward to this particular week.

00:09:06.240 --> 00:09:26.240
 So they want to know as part of their big picture master plan, they want to see if Bell Avenue can be shut down, primarily because of a lot of pedestrian activity across Bell between their campus buildings and the new housing that's going on the east side of Bell.

00:09:26.240 --> 00:09:43.240
 So they want to see what are the options, what is required, what is needed, what does the city want from our perspective, and how would they go about it, would there be a phasing plan, and what are the different aspects that we need to look at.

00:09:43.240 --> 00:09:58.240
 So this is an overview of what we talked about, what's the purpose of the project, what methodology we're going to use, define the study area, it shouldn't be just focused on one particular segment, but look at a big picture.

00:09:58.240 --> 00:10:07.240
 Cost, who's going to pay that cost, who's going to share the cost to do the study, and then last, what are the next steps.

00:10:07.240 --> 00:10:14.240
 So the purpose is a joint integration of their master plan with cities future needs.

00:10:14.240 --> 00:10:34.240
 This is a better way of understanding what the campus needs and provide for that, so that city can plan our infrastructure with this particular in mind so we, we have to determine the existing traffic conditions in and around that particular campus, that's the first step.

00:10:34.240 --> 00:10:56.240
 We'll evaluate the feasibility, is it even feasible, what happens to the rest of the intersections, or even the rest of the streets, and then what are the improvements, if we move forward with Bell, what are the improvements that are needed to the adjoining streets, be it Elm, Locust, even up to Carroll, Riddell, name it.

00:10:56.240 --> 00:11:20.240
 So this is the methodology, we'll go do data collection, a bunch of intersections, street segments, run some future numbers, which is forecasting their master plan, our city growth overall in terms of traffic, and then look at these different build out years, starting with existing 2040, and then conduct some alternative analysis.

00:11:20.240 --> 00:11:36.240
 What if we shut down portions of Bell, what if, what if we provide part time access, you know, few hours of the day if we shut down Bell, what's going to happen, so that those type of alternatives will be analyzed, and then develop mitigations.

00:11:36.240 --> 00:12:01.240
 So this is the area I just want to show you, if we are going to shut down Bell in this particular area, it will impact all these streets, Oakland, Locust, Elm, all the way up to Carroll, because Elm and Locust are not well connected, so there is no detour in between these to going back and forth, so even Carroll comes into picture.

00:12:01.240 --> 00:12:23.240
 There's areas in this north neighborhood, especially this intersection, that will come into picture, we go all the way to, this is Mockingbird or Old North, which covers everything in this area, because if we close this, what are the impacts not only on Riddell, but there are some neighborhoods that have cut through streets.

00:12:23.240 --> 00:12:28.240
 So we're encompassing the whole area, we'll look at it as part of the study.

00:12:28.240 --> 00:12:39.240
 What are the costs? So we reached out to a consultant and asked them, so what do you think are the costs, they're in the ballpark range of $140,000 for this joint study.

00:12:39.240 --> 00:12:58.240
 We are looking at ways to come up with the cost sharing. TW did mention that they don't have cash particularly in hand, but the other aspect they can look at is how do we share different things like sidewalk on Mingo.

00:12:58.240 --> 00:13:11.240
 We need that area next to their fence, if they can move the fence and we can provide that, that's a cost benefit to the city, to the citizens, so we take that as their share or part in this study.

00:13:11.240 --> 00:13:19.240
 So there are different ways of moving forward with this. Total cost is $140,000, this is just a start.

00:13:19.240 --> 00:13:33.240
 So what will happen, this is a long term when everything, all the agreements are in place, we'll move forward with the study, but in the interim what they want to do is they want to calm traffic down in this particular segment and start setting the stage.

00:13:33.240 --> 00:13:44.240
 So the first thing they're thinking about is a temporary roundabout at Chapel Drive. They already have a new access here across that goes into this new building that's under construction currently.

00:13:44.240 --> 00:13:55.240
 So they're looking at how we can set up a temporary roundabout, guide people to start using it, students start learning about it, people slow down.

00:13:55.240 --> 00:14:08.240
 Similarly, they'll put a temporary roundabout at College, which is where they can start diverting people off if need be and then calm traffic in between Chapel and College.

00:14:08.240 --> 00:14:19.240
 So the main idea is to slow everyone down coming into the campus area and make it feel as if you're entering a different zone as opposed to, oh, it's just a straight cut through, going through the campus.

00:14:19.240 --> 00:14:37.240
 Ultimately, also there's another roundabout at North Texas and this, I'm sorry, Texas Street and the reason for this one, the ultimate goal is to shut down Bell between Texas and Chapel and there is a new parking structure off of Oakland here.

00:14:37.240 --> 00:14:49.240
 So any car that wants to come in and won't be able to go forward will use that roundabout to circle back and head either to the parking garage or head out onto Locus.

00:14:49.240 --> 00:15:05.240
 So that's the idea of training people to understand, okay, this is the new setup in the interim, it'll work as a traffic calming device, slow people down, and then also train them that, yeah, this particular segment is going to be something different.

00:15:05.240 --> 00:15:12.240
 So this is an interim and we're working with TWU to come up with ways of implementing this when we're moving forward.

00:15:12.240 --> 00:15:16.240
 So these are the next steps and then questions.

00:15:16.240 --> 00:15:39.240
 So that was the presentation that was given to TWU about this particular item and the reason this meeting was moved, I wanted to start the conversation with Traffic Safety Commission about this is in the horizon, this could go forward and happen, and it's just a beginning.

00:15:39.240 --> 00:15:52.240
 So we want to make sure that you know what's going on and once the results of the traffic study come in, we'll definitely come back with a recommendation of what TWU needs to put in to make things work on Bell.

00:15:52.240 --> 00:15:55.240
 Any questions?

00:15:55.240 --> 00:15:56.240
 Yes.

00:15:56.240 --> 00:15:57.240
 >> Could you make part of that study?

00:15:57.240 --> 00:16:00.240
 >> Jim, we make sure to...

00:16:00.240 --> 00:16:08.240
 >> Could you make part of that study the A-Train extension into the TWU campus?

00:16:08.240 --> 00:16:12.240
 >> We can and we've had conversations with DCTA.

00:16:12.240 --> 00:16:17.240
 There is no substantial movement in that particular aspect.

00:16:17.240 --> 00:16:25.240
 There is a conceptual alternative in the TWU master plan, but it's not--and we'll work with TWU.

00:16:25.240 --> 00:16:31.240
 If they're willing to include that in their master plan, it will definitely be included in the study.

00:16:31.240 --> 00:16:37.240
 But I will leave it up to the feasibility aspect between DCTA and TWU.

00:16:37.240 --> 00:16:39.240
 Just as long as it's considered.

00:16:39.240 --> 00:16:41.240
 >> Yes.

00:16:41.240 --> 00:16:42.240
 >> I do have a question.

00:16:42.240 --> 00:16:48.240
 So somebody emailed me some questions, so I'm going to read it from what they sent me.

00:16:48.240 --> 00:16:54.240
 And so their question is, if the road were closed, would it be open to pedestrians and people on bikes?

00:16:54.240 --> 00:16:55.240
 >> Yes.

00:16:55.240 --> 00:16:56.240
 That is our goal.

00:16:56.240 --> 00:16:57.240
 >> Oh, okay.

00:16:57.240 --> 00:17:00.240
 >> It'll be mostly bike and pet area.

00:17:00.240 --> 00:17:02.240
 >> Okay.

00:17:02.240 --> 00:17:03.240
 All right.

00:17:03.240 --> 00:17:10.240
 And then she writes, if Belle Avenue cannot be closed, what are the plans to improve bicycle accommodations

00:17:10.240 --> 00:17:16.240
 between College Street and University 380 all the way to Windsor?

00:17:16.240 --> 00:17:20.240
 Currently, the bike lane ends on the uphill at College Street.

00:17:20.240 --> 00:17:22.240
 You want to go over there and let--are you going?

00:17:22.240 --> 00:17:23.240
 Okay.

00:17:23.240 --> 00:17:25.240
 >> I know exactly what you're talking about.

00:17:25.240 --> 00:17:26.240
 >> Okay.

00:17:26.240 --> 00:17:39.240
 So I think there's an uphill right here that's where the--so that's exactly where the bike lane drops off.

00:17:39.240 --> 00:17:40.240
 >> Right, yeah.

00:17:40.240 --> 00:17:50.240
 >> And then it merges--so it merges and becomes--so this lane is fully usable by bicyclists as well as vehicles.

00:17:50.240 --> 00:17:51.240
 >> Right, right.

00:17:51.240 --> 00:18:00.240
 >> So right now, it's a shared use area and, yeah, our primary goal is to convert this particular area

00:18:00.240 --> 00:18:07.240
 into more a bike-pet friendly area and keep the traffic out eventually once the study is done.

00:18:07.240 --> 00:18:16.240
 But in the interim, once the roundabouts are put in, this area will be a combined flow area anyways

00:18:16.240 --> 00:18:22.240
 because the roundabout will bring everything together and I think they can actually have slower speeds

00:18:22.240 --> 00:18:25.240
 and drive on the same shared use path.

00:18:25.240 --> 00:18:26.240
 >> Oh, okay.

00:18:26.240 --> 00:18:28.240
 You think that that will slow people down?

00:18:28.240 --> 00:18:30.240
 >> That will definitely slow people down.

00:18:30.240 --> 00:18:31.240
 >> Right.

00:18:31.240 --> 00:18:35.240
 Okay, because I'm kind of wondering too like I'm not on a bike.

00:18:35.240 --> 00:18:42.240
 I don't--I have not done a lot of roundabouts so I'm kind of wondering how that's going to like maneuvering next to a car,

00:18:42.240 --> 00:18:44.240
 how that would work but, you know.

00:18:44.240 --> 00:18:50.240
 >> Yeah, I think typically cars enter a roundabout at about 15 to 20 miles an hour.

00:18:50.240 --> 00:18:56.240
 It's not more than that and that's very low speed compared to some of the other streets that we have in this area.

00:18:56.240 --> 00:18:57.240
 >> Mm-hmm.

00:18:57.240 --> 00:19:04.240
 Okay, I think--let me make sure that I think that's--yeah.

00:19:04.240 --> 00:19:05.240
 >> Okay.

00:19:05.240 --> 00:19:06.240
 >> Thank you.

00:19:06.240 --> 00:19:09.240
 >> So I think the--it's interesting.

00:19:09.240 --> 00:19:16.240
 So I worked in the building right there on the right for four years on the other side of the street, kind of to the right over here.

00:19:16.240 --> 00:19:17.240
 There you go, just if you see it.

00:19:17.240 --> 00:19:18.240
 Oh, there's old home.

00:19:18.240 --> 00:19:26.240
 So I used to work there and so the thing that's interesting to me is I actually feel like this central part of campus, the street moves very slow.

00:19:26.240 --> 00:19:28.240
 The lanes are narrow.

00:19:28.240 --> 00:19:29.240
 There's lots of things to look at.

00:19:29.240 --> 00:19:31.240
 It does all the things that skinny lanes do.

00:19:31.240 --> 00:19:36.240
 It's right once you get off of those portions, particularly the downhill, is where I see it.

00:19:36.240 --> 00:19:40.240
 So I think the roundabout would be a great way to slow this all down.

00:19:40.240 --> 00:19:50.240
 But--and if TW really wants to shut down the street, I'm not opposed to it, but I also don't see it as a real problem because the car, if you've ever been there when classes are out,

00:19:50.240 --> 00:19:56.240
 I mean, trust me, cars know to avoid it because you're just going to be sitting there waiting for people crossing the street for five minutes.

00:19:56.240 --> 00:19:59.240
 Everyone's crossing and so I think people naturally know so.

00:19:59.240 --> 00:20:07.240
 Yeah, I think that area, this is where it really becomes dangerous real quick because you have cyclists, pedestrians coming off and cars speed up real quick.

00:20:07.240 --> 00:20:09.240
 It's the same problem we have off the square.

00:20:09.240 --> 00:20:11.240
 So just--it's a really interesting plan.

00:20:11.240 --> 00:20:16.240
 I'm just--I've never found a problem in the center part of the campus with cars.

00:20:16.240 --> 00:20:18.240
 They're moving super slow usually.

00:20:18.240 --> 00:20:19.240
 They're not gunning through that area.

00:20:19.240 --> 00:20:26.240
 I think the speed limit changes right here and this is where you're already on the slope and you start accelerating.

00:20:26.240 --> 00:20:31.240
 So this is exactly where it'll slow down and in the next round about it, North Texas will slow them down also.

00:20:31.240 --> 00:20:34.240
 Yeah, that would be good because it wasn't several years ago.

00:20:34.240 --> 00:20:37.240
 I thought a young woman was killed there.

00:20:37.240 --> 00:20:38.240
 Yeah, that's where the fatality was.

00:20:38.240 --> 00:20:43.240
 We have been registering complaints of the danger right before that happened because it is.

00:20:43.240 --> 00:20:44.240
 It's dark.

00:20:44.240 --> 00:20:47.240
 It was wide and dangerous, but yeah.

00:20:47.240 --> 00:20:50.240
 Yes, and we are working on a lighting plan in this area too, street lights.

00:20:50.240 --> 00:21:00.240
 And this is also part of connecting the downtown transit center to TWU is figuring out how to make those roads safer for pedestrian and cyclists.

00:21:00.240 --> 00:21:10.240
 Okay, so this might just be a dumb nomenclature question, but will this be a roundabout or will it be a traffic circle?

00:21:10.240 --> 00:21:16.240
 So we will try and put in a roundabout because ultimately we want to construct a roundabout.

00:21:16.240 --> 00:21:28.240
 We still have to work out the details, but we've talked to TWU and actually Texas Street is a perfect location.

00:21:28.240 --> 00:21:33.240
 If you give me a second.

00:21:33.240 --> 00:21:43.240
 Well, wrong place.

00:21:43.240 --> 00:21:45.240
 There we go.

00:21:45.240 --> 00:21:49.240
 Actually, TWU has this corner.

00:21:49.240 --> 00:21:54.240
 So they actually have enough space here to create that curve to come in.

00:21:54.240 --> 00:21:58.240
 So a roundabout here will fit well and then we'll install the median.

00:21:58.240 --> 00:22:01.240
 So this median, this turn lane is not required.

00:22:01.240 --> 00:22:05.240
 So we'll install the splitter islands in the middle and only one lane goes through.

00:22:05.240 --> 00:22:14.240
 So this intersection has enough space currently that we can convert the approaches into a roundabout.

00:22:14.240 --> 00:22:18.240
 That's great.

00:22:18.240 --> 00:22:20.240
 Is there a timeline that you're looking at?

00:22:20.240 --> 00:22:22.240
 That's a good question.

00:22:22.240 --> 00:22:29.240
 I think TWU is looking at can we get the study completed by next summer?

00:22:29.240 --> 00:22:36.240
 And in the interim, let's start working on what's the cost, what are the pricing for this temporary roundabout.

00:22:36.240 --> 00:22:46.240
 The stuff that we're talking about is more bolt down curbs, rubberized plastic that can be easily bolted down.

00:22:46.240 --> 00:22:53.240
 And then once people get used to it and you want to implement the bigger or the permanent solution, then you can just pull it out.

00:22:53.240 --> 00:22:54.240
 You start using it somewhere else.

00:22:54.240 --> 00:22:59.240
 So that's the plan.

00:22:59.240 --> 00:23:00.240
 Okay. Thank you.

00:23:00.240 --> 00:23:02.240
 You just need us to chat about it, right?

00:23:02.240 --> 00:23:03.240
 Yes.

00:23:03.240 --> 00:23:06.240
 So it's more of a let's get the conversation started.

00:23:06.240 --> 00:23:08.240
 Does anybody else have any questions or comments about?

00:23:08.240 --> 00:23:16.240
 Where do you anticipate the northbound traffic coming from the south to divert to?

00:23:16.240 --> 00:23:18.240
 I mean, are we going over to Oakland?

00:23:18.240 --> 00:23:20.240
 So there are a couple of things.

00:23:20.240 --> 00:23:31.240
 If the north-- if it's a cut-through traffic that goes to this neighborhood, most likely there is a decision point down here that they will use some of the other routes.

00:23:31.240 --> 00:23:36.240
 But if they continue and they're at this intersection, they'll continue going on Mingo.

00:23:36.240 --> 00:23:48.240
 And we are planning to looking at widening Riddell to a larger facility, to a four-lane street where-- and even in their master plan,

00:23:48.240 --> 00:23:54.240
 they have a major entrance to the camp, TW campus in their ultimate master plan from Riddell.

00:23:54.240 --> 00:23:56.240
 So Riddell becomes a major street.

00:23:56.240 --> 00:24:03.240
 This intersection widens up and adds capacity, and that's how you would get into this neighborhood.

00:24:03.240 --> 00:24:04.240
 There are other options.

00:24:04.240 --> 00:24:08.240
 You can use Oakland and then hop on to Locust to go north.

00:24:08.240 --> 00:24:09.240
 So there are different options.

00:24:09.240 --> 00:24:13.240
 And, you know, traffic is like water.

00:24:13.240 --> 00:24:17.240
 You'll find the path of least resistance eventually.

00:24:17.240 --> 00:24:27.240
 Yeah, I figure that most people coming from the south would just-- if they're going to go north and they want to go to the east, they'll just hop on to Mingo right there at Bell.

00:24:27.240 --> 00:24:40.240
 But I was thinking about the traffic that might be on Withers and Texas and also diverting over to Oakland and not-- trying not to-- I mean, there is going to be a parking garage.

00:24:40.240 --> 00:24:41.240
 Yes.

00:24:41.240 --> 00:24:44.240
 But not loading that street up because there is a lot of traffic there, too.

00:24:44.240 --> 00:24:52.240
 So that's exactly what the study will determine is, yes, Oakland has-- currently has on-street parking available.

00:24:52.240 --> 00:25:00.240
 So if we really need the capacity in the future and a lot of traffic has been diverted to Oakland, then what are the changes that we need there?

00:25:00.240 --> 00:25:09.240
 Do we get rid of on-street parking or how do we compensate for that particular parking thing and then provide more capacity on Oakland?

00:25:09.240 --> 00:25:12.240
 Two lanes in each direction or whatnot.

00:25:12.240 --> 00:25:14.240
 Okay.

00:25:14.240 --> 00:25:17.240
 Is Riddell going to be connected eventually?

00:25:17.240 --> 00:25:18.240
 Connected to--

00:25:18.240 --> 00:25:20.240
 The north and south segments of Riddell?

00:25:20.240 --> 00:25:21.240
 Here?

00:25:21.240 --> 00:25:22.240
 Yes.

00:25:22.240 --> 00:25:23.240
 Okay.

00:25:23.240 --> 00:25:33.240
 It's a CIP project where Riddell is going to-- actually, it's-- yeah, it's going to swing across and then connect here.

00:25:33.240 --> 00:25:37.240
 So it's going to be a 90-degree connection to Mingo.

00:25:37.240 --> 00:25:44.240
 So there is-- it's currently under design.

00:25:44.240 --> 00:25:47.240
 So, yeah, long-term good plans around this area.

00:25:47.240 --> 00:25:48.240
 Yeah.

00:25:48.240 --> 00:25:52.240
 And are you going to close Pertain when you do that?

00:25:52.240 --> 00:25:53.240
 Pertain.

00:25:53.240 --> 00:25:54.240
 Are you going to leave that open?

00:25:54.240 --> 00:26:02.240
 So one of the-- there are several options, but one of the options is this will go around that way.

00:26:02.240 --> 00:26:05.240
 Wayne can continue further and connect to Riddell.

00:26:05.240 --> 00:26:08.240
 So we'll lose this crossing and then lose that crossing.

00:26:08.240 --> 00:26:16.240
 And there will be only one crossing instead of two crossings at the railroad.

00:26:16.240 --> 00:26:20.240
 Okay.

00:26:20.240 --> 00:26:21.240
 Okay.

00:26:21.240 --> 00:26:23.240
 Any other questions, comments?

00:26:23.240 --> 00:26:24.240
 All right.

00:26:24.240 --> 00:26:27.240
 Carry on.

00:26:27.240 --> 00:26:40.240
 All right, that means we move on to item 2CTSC 18-049, which is to hold-- receive a report, hold discussion,

00:26:40.240 --> 00:26:55.240
 and make a recommendation to city council for approval of ordinance to restrict on-street parking along the east side of Bernard from Willowwood to Acme Street.

00:26:55.240 --> 00:26:58.240
 So this is one of the first ones for the parking.

00:26:58.240 --> 00:27:10.240
 And there are several concerned resident requests as well as a request from council member or Mayor Pro Tem Ryan about this particular segment.

00:27:10.240 --> 00:27:18.240
 This is segment of Bernard from Acme Street to Willowwood Street.

00:27:18.240 --> 00:27:25.240
 So currently, the way it functions, this is 377, connects to 35.

00:27:25.240 --> 00:27:32.240
 Majority of the traffic entering this neighborhood uses that access to go into the neighborhood.

00:27:32.240 --> 00:27:39.240
 And one of the issues is currently on Acme, parking is prohibited both directions.

00:27:39.240 --> 00:27:41.240
 It's a very narrow street.

00:27:41.240 --> 00:27:46.240
 I think it's 25 or 26 feet wide.

00:27:46.240 --> 00:27:50.240
 So parking is restricted on either side.

00:27:50.240 --> 00:27:53.240
 There is no parking on both sides.

00:27:53.240 --> 00:28:01.240
 When you get to this particular intersection, parking is allowed on both sides.

00:28:01.240 --> 00:28:04.240
 And people start going north.

00:28:04.240 --> 00:28:06.240
 There is commercial.

00:28:06.240 --> 00:28:09.240
 After this first house goes, there is a commercial area.

00:28:09.240 --> 00:28:17.240
 And then especially in the evening rush hour when people are returning, the major concern is there is only one lane available.

00:28:17.240 --> 00:28:19.240
 It's currently 26 feet wide.

00:28:19.240 --> 00:28:24.240
 With parked cars on both sides, you have less than 20 feet.

00:28:24.240 --> 00:28:27.240
 You have barely that one car could fit in.

00:28:27.240 --> 00:28:35.240
 So every once in a while, you have a car that's in front of you and then you have to back out in a driveway area or a space that's open.

00:28:35.240 --> 00:28:37.240
 So that's what's happening.

00:28:37.240 --> 00:28:45.240
 In the neighborhood, residents are really frustrated with this particular segment.

00:28:45.240 --> 00:28:52.240
 And then once they hit Willowwood, which is this street, Willowwood is no parking on either side.

00:28:52.240 --> 00:28:56.240
 So that portion, they're fine accessing.

00:28:56.240 --> 00:29:14.240
 So right now, there is this small connector piece between Acme and Willowwood that has some serious parking concerns as far as access, safety, people not able to get into the neighborhood.

00:29:14.240 --> 00:29:33.240
 And that's the reason we looked at it according to the fire code, as I mentioned in the AIS, according to fire code, if you have anywhere between 26 and 32 feet of street, you're only allowed to park on one side because according to the code, they need 20 feet clear.

00:29:33.240 --> 00:29:37.240
 And then fire code requires at a minimum a six-foot parking lane.

00:29:37.240 --> 00:29:45.240
 So this is a perfect candidate, this particular small segment is a perfect candidate for restricting parking on one side.

00:29:45.240 --> 00:29:49.240
 And if the parking on one side is restricted, then the fire lane requirements are met.

00:29:49.240 --> 00:29:59.240
 You have 20 feet on one side as well as it will alleviate safety concerns from the neighbors, especially when it starts getting darker early and early.

00:29:59.240 --> 00:30:22.240
 So that's why at this point, staff is recommending that the commission approves moving forward and recommends approval to council for restricted parking on the east side of Bernard where majority of the frontage is commercial.

00:30:22.240 --> 00:30:24.240
 Any questions?

00:30:24.240 --> 00:30:30.240
 >> I guess the question I have is, and I think it's a great idea, but where do those people park then if they can't park over there?

00:30:30.240 --> 00:30:33.240
 Is there other places for them to go?

00:30:33.240 --> 00:30:35.240
 >> So that's a good question.

00:30:35.240 --> 00:30:38.240
 This is a commercial frontage anyways.

00:30:38.240 --> 00:30:42.240
 Bernard Street parking is allowed on the south side on both sides.

00:30:42.240 --> 00:30:49.240
 And the street is, I'm not sure exactly the width of the street, but slightly wider than the north side.

00:30:49.240 --> 00:30:54.240
 So, but this particular is a very highly used travel path.

00:30:54.240 --> 00:31:00.240
 So it's a main connector for the whole neighborhood, especially when you have that one interchange.

00:31:00.240 --> 00:31:04.240
 The other place that people connect is the full interchanges at North Texas.

00:31:04.240 --> 00:31:20.240
 So if you see that this becomes a big entry point, and that's why given the flow of traffic and the volume, that's the reason it's been requested that we restrict parking on one side.

00:31:20.240 --> 00:31:26.240
 Any other questions?

00:31:26.240 --> 00:31:37.240
 And obviously these commercial uses, they're not using on street parking at nighttime anyways.

00:31:37.240 --> 00:31:42.240
 >> Did we get any feedback from property owners?

00:31:42.240 --> 00:31:45.240
 >> We have not received any property owner responses.

00:31:45.240 --> 00:31:53.240
 We've contacted all these property owners that are fronting all of these on either side, and we have not received any feedback.

00:31:53.240 --> 00:32:02.240
 I mean, we've already, we've done letters and door hangers in the past two weeks.

00:32:02.240 --> 00:32:07.240
 >> Okay, any other questions, comments about this?

00:32:07.240 --> 00:32:12.240
 Okay, so we're looking for, we're just discussing this.

00:32:12.240 --> 00:32:13.240
 Are we going to make a--

00:32:13.240 --> 00:32:14.240
 >> Recommendation to the council.

00:32:14.240 --> 00:32:16.240
 >> Make a recommendation.

00:32:16.240 --> 00:32:18.240
 Make recommendation, okay.

00:32:18.240 --> 00:32:21.240
 Does, and do I have a recommendation to move this forward?

00:32:21.240 --> 00:32:24.240
 >> Excuse me real quick, is this a chance for him to get to speak, or?

00:32:24.240 --> 00:32:25.240
 >> He's on.

00:32:25.240 --> 00:32:26.240
 >> He's the next.

00:32:26.240 --> 00:32:30.240
 >> Yeah, he's on next.

00:32:30.240 --> 00:32:34.240
 Give him a call, find out if he wants to talk.

00:32:34.240 --> 00:32:35.240
 Okay.

00:32:35.240 --> 00:32:36.240
 >> It's just one side.

00:32:36.240 --> 00:32:37.240
 >> Sorry.

00:32:37.240 --> 00:32:40.240
 >> Okay.

00:32:40.240 --> 00:32:41.240
 >> I'll make a motion to approve.

00:32:41.240 --> 00:32:42.240
 >> Okay.

00:32:42.240 --> 00:32:43.240
 >> Staff recommendation.

00:32:43.240 --> 00:32:44.240
 >> Okay.

00:32:44.240 --> 00:32:45.240
 >> I second it.

00:32:45.240 --> 00:32:47.240
 >> And a second, everyone in favor?

00:32:47.240 --> 00:32:48.240
 Right hand up.

00:32:48.240 --> 00:32:49.240
 There you go.

00:32:49.240 --> 00:32:53.240
 Okay, it's unanimous, that will go forward to council.

00:32:53.240 --> 00:33:02.240
 So that brings us to item 2D, which is TSC 18-051, which is to receive a report, hold

00:33:02.240 --> 00:33:08.240
 discussion and make recommendation to city council for approval of ordinance to restrict

00:33:08.240 --> 00:33:16.240
 on street parking along the west side of Hinkle from Windsor to University Drive.

00:33:16.240 --> 00:33:27.240
 Yes, this -- so when we wrote the AIS and our recommendation, we did not have the meeting

00:33:27.240 --> 00:33:28.240
 that we had last night.

00:33:28.240 --> 00:33:30.240
 We had a last night meeting.

00:33:30.240 --> 00:33:32.240
 We -- staff met.

00:33:32.240 --> 00:33:40.240
 There's a Hinkle Drive drainage project along Hinkle and Windsor area.

00:33:40.240 --> 00:33:44.240
 So there are drainage improvements along this area as well as along Hinkle.

00:33:44.240 --> 00:33:48.240
 And then this whole street will be repaved, Windsor and Hinkle.

00:33:48.240 --> 00:33:49.240
 So that was the project.

00:33:49.240 --> 00:33:51.240
 So we had a public meeting.

00:33:51.240 --> 00:33:53.240
 And there is a brand new development going in here.

00:33:53.240 --> 00:33:56.240
 So it was kind of a combo meeting.

00:33:56.240 --> 00:33:58.240
 Just a quick background on that.

00:33:58.240 --> 00:34:05.240
 We received feedback from residents about not wanting to restrict parking on Hinkle.

00:34:05.240 --> 00:34:14.240
 And in that case, we want to let the commissioner know that we need to weigh that option at this point.

00:34:14.240 --> 00:34:16.240
 It was not part of our AIS.

00:34:16.240 --> 00:34:22.240
 So staff recommendation, what we can do is we can hold this item.

00:34:22.240 --> 00:34:28.240
 We can come back later or we can make -- reject our recommendations that we don't want to restrict parking.

00:34:28.240 --> 00:34:30.240
 So that's -- all these options are in the table.

00:34:30.240 --> 00:34:42.240
 But I want to present the case in the light that there have been several concerns about the bicycle lane on Hinkle.

00:34:42.240 --> 00:34:45.240
 I know the pavement conditions are not the greatest.

00:34:45.240 --> 00:34:51.240
 Hinkle is in really poor bad -- poor conditions.

00:34:51.240 --> 00:34:55.240
 And I don't think there was -- there's a -- it shows up here.

00:34:55.240 --> 00:35:03.240
 But there was a bike lane installed on Hinkle next to a parking area.

00:35:03.240 --> 00:35:08.240
 So there was a parking area marked a bike lane and another bike lane on the other side.

00:35:08.240 --> 00:35:15.240
 What was happening is the cars were being parked in the bike lane.

00:35:15.240 --> 00:35:20.240
 Drivers were driving in the bike and the parking lane.

00:35:20.240 --> 00:35:22.240
 So there was not clear direction.

00:35:22.240 --> 00:35:30.240
 People were confused what usage went where and there were a lot of complaints about what's happening.

00:35:30.240 --> 00:35:40.240
 There was a very little understanding of -- so if you look at this striping, this is what existed at some point.

00:35:40.240 --> 00:35:43.240
 So that's a parking area.

00:35:43.240 --> 00:35:46.240
 That's the bike lane in the area.

00:35:46.240 --> 00:35:49.240
 These are the two travel lanes and this is the second bike lane.

00:35:49.240 --> 00:35:52.240
 So that's how it was striped.

00:35:52.240 --> 00:35:59.240
 And for the longest time, people were driving using both the bike area as well as the lane.

00:35:59.240 --> 00:36:06.240
 And then it was expected that the bicyclists should be driving in the parking area.

00:36:06.240 --> 00:36:08.240
 So there was not clear understanding.

00:36:08.240 --> 00:36:09.240
 There was some issues.

00:36:09.240 --> 00:36:11.240
 Yes, the pavement is bad.

00:36:11.240 --> 00:36:21.240
 So one of the options and alternatives we looked at as part of that project is what if we remove parking and create buffered bike lanes on either side?

00:36:21.240 --> 00:36:25.240
 We looked at parking utilization.

00:36:25.240 --> 00:36:26.240
 It's very low.

00:36:26.240 --> 00:36:31.240
 There are a lot of these lots further down the street.

00:36:31.240 --> 00:36:35.240
 As you can see, there's barely any parking that barely have any access.

00:36:35.240 --> 00:36:37.240
 There's one house that has access.

00:36:37.240 --> 00:36:43.240
 All the others in the subdivision have access to the cross streets.

00:36:43.240 --> 00:36:50.240
 So if you look at some of these, one has that and then all of these have access here.

00:36:50.240 --> 00:36:59.240
 So a lot of them park along these cross streets and that was the thinking behind our recommendation even before we had that public meeting.

00:36:59.240 --> 00:37:07.240
 So the whole idea was to create buffered bike lanes on both directions, remove parking and two travel lanes.

00:37:07.240 --> 00:37:17.240
 Given what feedback we received in last night's meeting, we're open to having a discussion and looking at things differently.

00:37:17.240 --> 00:37:27.240
 If parking is required, then staff can work in that direction.

00:37:27.240 --> 00:37:30.240
 >> Okay. I have a quick question for Preetam.

00:37:30.240 --> 00:37:33.240
 How many people came to your meeting last night?

00:37:33.240 --> 00:37:34.240
 >> How many were there, Tracy?

00:37:34.240 --> 00:37:36.240
 About 50 or 60 people, I think.

00:37:36.240 --> 00:37:37.240
 It was packed.

00:37:37.240 --> 00:37:39.240
 It was really packed.

00:37:39.240 --> 00:37:42.240
 >> All right.

00:37:42.240 --> 00:37:44.240
 >> Very well attended.

00:37:44.240 --> 00:37:48.240
 And I think we heard from four or five people that this parking is needed.

00:37:48.240 --> 00:37:52.240
 So that's when we stepped back and said, okay, this is good feedback.

00:37:52.240 --> 00:37:53.240
 >> Okay.

00:37:53.240 --> 00:37:54.240
 All right.

00:37:54.240 --> 00:37:55.240
 All right.

00:37:55.240 --> 00:37:57.240
 Yes, please.

00:37:57.240 --> 00:37:59.240
 And I'm going to make you do it all over again.

00:37:59.240 --> 00:38:01.240
 State your name, your address.

00:38:01.240 --> 00:38:02.240
 >> Yes, ma'am.

00:38:02.240 --> 00:38:11.240
 Again, my name is Gary Dickens and I reside at 1201 Amherst Drive, which I don't know, can I use this?

00:38:11.240 --> 00:38:18.240
 It's way down, way down the street from where this one's showing.

00:38:18.240 --> 00:38:26.240
 >> Saying that there's limited or no very limited usage of the parking, I would agree in part, but it is used regularly.

00:38:26.240 --> 00:38:28.240
 I don't know what you consider regularly.

00:38:28.240 --> 00:38:36.240
 I don't park there every night, but I have family members that park there three to four times a week anytime I have visitors come to my house.

00:38:36.240 --> 00:38:43.240
 Because where my house is located, I have a stop sign in front of my house and a mailbox.

00:38:43.240 --> 00:38:46.240
 There's no parking in front of my house whatsoever.

00:38:46.240 --> 00:38:51.240
 And so Hinkle allows parking legally for me to park.

00:38:51.240 --> 00:38:56.240
 The problems that Hinkle has, I would say, is with the striping.

00:38:56.240 --> 00:39:08.240
 The communication that's there, if you see on like this picture, they've included the parking lane and a bike lane, but because of the way it's striped, it's very vague and ambiguous.

00:39:08.240 --> 00:39:16.240
 And then if it was clearly striped, I think people could see where the parking is allowed and where the bicycle path would be.

00:39:16.240 --> 00:39:19.240
 I'm not against having a bicycle lane by any stretch.

00:39:19.240 --> 00:39:20.240
 I think it's awesome.

00:39:20.240 --> 00:39:28.240
 But removing the parking would create just a nuisance to myself and some of my neighbors.

00:39:28.240 --> 00:39:31.240
 It's going to increase parking on the side streets in front of my neighbor's homes.

00:39:31.240 --> 00:39:37.240
 There's going to be my friends and family and things like that that will be parking there.

00:39:37.240 --> 00:39:44.240
 My neighbor across the street directly and myself, we do park on Hinkle on a fairly regular basis.

00:39:44.240 --> 00:39:48.240
 So for me, I didn't know there was a meeting last night, otherwise I probably would have been there too.

00:39:48.240 --> 00:39:50.240
 But that's just my opinion.

00:39:50.240 --> 00:39:53.240
 I don't know if I'm missing anything, I think.

00:39:53.240 --> 00:40:03.240
 That's our biggest concern is that by removing, by making it not legal to park there would just create a nuisance and just a problem.

00:40:03.240 --> 00:40:07.240
 I mean, we can live with it, we'll find a way, but we'd like to avoid it if possible.

00:40:07.240 --> 00:40:11.240
 Any questions that you want for me as a homeowner?

00:40:11.240 --> 00:40:12.240
 Yes, sir.

00:40:12.240 --> 00:40:18.240
 So I'm just curious, how crowded is the street that's on the side of your house?

00:40:18.240 --> 00:40:25.240
 Amherst, the street Amherst is a very busy street because it's a cross-through street from university.

00:40:25.240 --> 00:40:35.240
 So people turn off to get away from university either at Malone Street or Cornell or even down at Georgetown.

00:40:35.240 --> 00:40:39.240
 And they'll use Amherst as a cross-through, so it's very busy.

00:40:39.240 --> 00:40:46.240
 There's parking on both sides of the street, but like again, my neighbor has a mailbox and so there's limited access on his front.

00:40:46.240 --> 00:40:50.240
 And with my stop sign and mailbox, there's not much access.

00:40:50.240 --> 00:40:57.240
 We actually park one of our cars between my house and my neighbor's house, so I'm actually parking in front of their house fairly regularly.

00:40:57.240 --> 00:41:00.240
 Well, every night. It is really.

00:41:00.240 --> 00:41:07.240
 So if you had family over and wanted to park there, like on a regular basis, how far away would they have to park?

00:41:07.240 --> 00:41:11.240
 Oh, a couple houses down maybe if they were parking.

00:41:11.240 --> 00:41:18.240
 And we could park across the street in the parking lot, but again, that's not technically legal to have the towing signs, things like that.

00:41:18.240 --> 00:41:26.240
 Because we're not we're not either going to the church or to the movie tavern, because that's the parking lot that's across the street from my house.

00:41:26.240 --> 00:41:31.240
 So just I'm just thinking of all possible solutions, and I don't even know.

00:41:31.240 --> 00:41:35.240
 Pretend might be really interesting to see what our various options are on that street.

00:41:35.240 --> 00:41:42.240
 Do we are we ever able to negotiate with like a private parking lot that has availability during times or something like a case like this?

00:41:42.240 --> 00:41:46.240
 Could they open it up or not tow if there's extra parking being used?

00:41:46.240 --> 00:41:48.240
 Do we have any success with stuff like that?

00:41:48.240 --> 00:41:52.240
 Yeah, I don't think we have any agreements with private parking lots.

00:41:52.240 --> 00:42:01.240
 It becomes a liability issue for them to open it up to public and then safety concerns that they have.

00:42:01.240 --> 00:42:07.240
 So the parkings, his house.

00:42:07.240 --> 00:42:23.240
 So he's a damn hearse. If you just go further down that direction.

00:42:23.240 --> 00:42:25.240
 So this this is my house here.

00:42:25.240 --> 00:42:32.240
 And again, with the stop sign and the mailbox, there's no legal space to park because I'd be too close to the stop sign.

00:42:32.240 --> 00:42:39.240
 So we park oftentimes between that first and second tree there. Plus, you'll see my trash bins in this picture.

00:42:39.240 --> 00:42:41.240
 You can actually see the trash bins.

00:42:41.240 --> 00:42:48.240
 That's where my trash and recyclables are put out on the street, as well as most of my neighbors along Hinkle.

00:42:48.240 --> 00:42:53.240
 All put our trash bins and recycle bins, which would be in the parking lane if it's allowed to park.

00:42:53.240 --> 00:43:03.240
 Well, so if we got rid of this swoopy curve, couldn't the potentially the stop sign move out like six feet towards the road?

00:43:03.240 --> 00:43:06.240
 And then you would also have parking spots there, too.

00:43:06.240 --> 00:43:10.240
 Would that be another solution to create spots or do we have to have swoopy curves?

00:43:10.240 --> 00:43:13.240
 And that's that's consistent with our standards.

00:43:13.240 --> 00:43:18.240
 The swoopy curves is a minimum radius required for turning vehicles.

00:43:18.240 --> 00:43:26.240
 Trucks, larger trucks, larger vehicles, you won't be able to turn it. That curve changes and becomes a really angled corner.

00:43:26.240 --> 00:43:32.240
 What do you mean? It looks like there's like a ton of room there. So if it was straight, came straight out, what would?

00:43:32.240 --> 00:43:38.240
 So the turning from the other side into and turning out onto Hinkle.

00:43:38.240 --> 00:43:46.240
 If you look at the double yellow line, a vehicle that is larger would not be able to make that without going onto the curb.

00:43:46.240 --> 00:43:52.240
 They're very real to drag. So that's a minimum standard criteria for our curves.

00:43:52.240 --> 00:43:57.240
 And the way they've changed the striping, you can see where they've moved the striping over for the lineage.

00:43:57.240 --> 00:44:00.240
 And so there's plenty of lane space as far as there always has been.

00:44:00.240 --> 00:44:09.240
 But now there's even more space for parking that would not cause any kind of hindrance with traffic because it should be a one lane either direction.

00:44:09.240 --> 00:44:18.240
 And if you choose to change that, I'll come and protest that as well.

00:44:18.240 --> 00:44:24.240
 Well, I'm just I don't know if the questions are specifically for you, but for whoever, right? As part of kind of the discussion.

00:44:24.240 --> 00:44:30.240
 So yes. So what are the what are the options here? I mean, so right now is that I have another comment card.

00:44:30.240 --> 00:44:36.240
 So let's go ahead and let's see if we can. OK, thank you.

00:44:36.240 --> 00:44:42.240
 Hang tight. We might have more questions for you. But is Gail here? Gail Garber.

00:44:42.240 --> 00:44:51.240
 OK. OK. So I have a comment card from Gail Garber, who resides at 1200 Meadow Ridge.

00:44:51.240 --> 00:44:58.240
 She is she didn't check. Oh, she does not want to speak, but she's in opposition.

00:44:58.240 --> 00:45:05.240
 Her comment is parking is used more during the summer and daytime than now.

00:45:05.240 --> 00:45:14.240
 It real viewing now and an evening, not a good comp to use as data that is relevant.

00:45:14.240 --> 00:45:20.240
 I personally have used parking on Hinkle multiple times. My work crews in my house use the parking.

00:45:20.240 --> 00:45:25.240
 Also, both Good Sam and Brookdale have used the street parking in just the past two months.

00:45:25.240 --> 00:45:34.240
 So we have two comments in opposition. I want to ask, like looking at Hinkle and I've spent time on my bike on Hinkle.

00:45:34.240 --> 00:45:40.240
 And it's really it seems to me like Hinkle is two different ecosystems.

00:45:40.240 --> 00:45:53.240
 We have this system that where the houses are and then we've got that stretch where cars speed up and where there has been a fatality years ago.

00:45:53.240 --> 00:46:07.240
 There was a cyclist cycling fatality on Hinkle. And I'm wondering whether we could think in terms of bifurcating the treatment of Hinkle and the more northern part.

00:46:07.240 --> 00:46:12.240
 Get the treatment that we're talking about removing parking, protected bike lanes.

00:46:12.240 --> 00:46:22.240
 But then the section that's next to the residential areas, there will be some natural traffic calming with cars in the street.

00:46:22.240 --> 00:46:28.240
 And it's true. If you're going to follow the rules and not park in front of the stop sign,

00:46:28.240 --> 00:46:37.240
 then those houses lose some significant parking on the streets that they front.

00:46:37.240 --> 00:46:42.240
 That's a thought. I know we don't have to make a decision tonight and there probably will be more meetings.

00:46:42.240 --> 00:46:45.240
 So lucky you.

00:46:45.240 --> 00:46:53.240
 So just so that, you know, yesterday's meeting included a big development going in. It's a residential development.

00:46:53.240 --> 00:46:59.240
 So I think it'll mostly come in line with residential on either side, this particular north section.

00:46:59.240 --> 00:47:05.240
 So it probably will change character soon and may require that parking as part of that.

00:47:05.240 --> 00:47:11.240
 That's what we heard is the development may require parking on Hinkle.

00:47:11.240 --> 00:47:18.240
 Could they, I mean, since we're going to get some fresh, you know, greenfield kind of dug up there,

00:47:18.240 --> 00:47:32.240
 would some onus be on the development to provide more of a setback potentially including more bike and pedestrian infrastructure on Hinkle?

00:47:32.240 --> 00:47:35.240
 They are putting in sidewalks on Hinkle.

00:47:35.240 --> 00:47:44.240
 Okay. And as far as setbacks, I can't talk to about how much setback they have. It's more of a planning facet.

00:47:44.240 --> 00:47:49.240
 I think that's some kind of-- that was kind of a dense development, I believe, that was going in there.

00:47:49.240 --> 00:47:51.240
 What's the density there?

00:47:51.240 --> 00:47:54.240
 NR3 development.

00:47:54.240 --> 00:47:56.240
 Oh, okay.

00:47:56.240 --> 00:48:10.240
 [ Inaudible Remark ]

00:48:10.240 --> 00:48:14.240
 I'd like to get this sweater for the record that you have on your description. That's awesome.

00:48:14.240 --> 00:48:19.240
 Okay. My name is Tracy Beck. I live at 611 Magnolia, which is in this area.

00:48:19.240 --> 00:48:26.240
 Okay. I thought I could outrun this project. I worked at TextDOT. I opposed the neighborhood.

00:48:26.240 --> 00:48:30.240
 And then I'm working at the city, and I'm actually not opposed to the neighborhood.

00:48:30.240 --> 00:48:35.240
 And I had a lot more involvement. And my mother got me this sweater, which I was going to change out of.

00:48:35.240 --> 00:48:42.240
 And I said, "I'll be on camera with the sweater that you bought me that she now doesn't remember buying me." So it's fun.

00:48:42.240 --> 00:48:50.240
 Okay. So my great introduction. I attended the meeting last night, which we anticipated was going to be a CIP, the Capital Improvement Project,

00:48:50.240 --> 00:48:53.240
 because it's been long awaited from all of the neighbors, including myself.

00:48:53.240 --> 00:48:58.240
 And one or two people were very interested in hearing about that project in a very full room.

00:48:58.240 --> 00:49:02.240
 And they said, "Let's hear about that fireside development," because there's been a lot of changes.

00:49:02.240 --> 00:49:07.240
 There were going to be townhomes at one point. Then they turned into that they were going to be a senior development.

00:49:07.240 --> 00:49:15.240
 And that was a huge point last night, was where did that senior development, senior living, not assisted living, but just gated senior community.

00:49:15.240 --> 00:49:24.240
 So at that point, a lot of the residents last night saw what was originally fireside senior has now become fireside,

00:49:24.240 --> 00:49:27.240
 a new development, which is just traditional NR3.

00:49:27.240 --> 00:49:28.240
 NR3? Okay.

00:49:28.240 --> 00:49:37.240
 So it's 107 homes, approximately, I want to say it was 30 acres. I might be wrong on the 30 acres. It may have been 40 acres.

00:49:37.240 --> 00:49:45.240
 But it's a gross amount of the one, three homes per acre. They have a detention pond in it, which takes up some common area.

00:49:45.240 --> 00:49:55.240
 They've got actually two ponds that are going in. So with that information, the residents last night have seen two different fireside projects.

00:49:55.240 --> 00:50:03.240
 And they are confused as to which one is coming in, because they have the same name with two totally different developers, two totally different entities.

00:50:03.240 --> 00:50:12.240
 And it's been over a couple of years. So there was a lot of information shared last night, as well as a lot of concern about traffic and such.

00:50:12.240 --> 00:50:20.240
 So one of the things that came up with this development is that they've got one point of access on Henkel, and it's going to align with MIMOSA as proposed.

00:50:20.240 --> 00:50:27.240
 The project's been approved. It's gone through platting, it's gone through zoning, it's on final plat. And if you're out there today, it's under construction.

00:50:27.240 --> 00:50:34.240
 So the time to ask them to do anything additional, their traffic study didn't suggest anything significant.

00:50:34.240 --> 00:50:42.240
 It sounds like a lot of homes, 107 homes. But in the reality, in the new neighborhoods that we see, that's not a lot of traffic.

00:50:42.240 --> 00:50:52.240
 What we did with this new home, because it switched from a senior development into a traditional non-senior, is we opened up, I've got a little arrow.

00:50:52.240 --> 00:50:59.240
 We opened up a second point of access up here. It was going to be a fire access only, because the original neighborhood needed two points of access.

00:50:59.240 --> 00:51:10.240
 Our development code says do not access an arterial. So when the first neighborhood came in, we said you don't have enough traffic to warrant two points of access.

00:51:10.240 --> 00:51:21.240
 To relieve some of that traffic with the new development, because there will be more traffic, we opened this up so that the majority of the people that need to go to the west, to the north, 35W, won't use Hinkle.

00:51:21.240 --> 00:51:26.240
 They're going to have an outlet to go to Razor as far away from all of the neighbors on Hinkle.

00:51:26.240 --> 00:51:37.240
 And then this driver right here is going to be as far south as possible, so anyone who doesn't want to go north will end up having to further south so that they have the least impact to all the neighborhoods, stay away from the intersections.

00:51:37.240 --> 00:51:43.240
 One of the components that was brought up with this development is that we've changed our cross sections for our roadways.

00:51:43.240 --> 00:51:50.240
 We mentioned earlier about the 32 feet of right of way for being the minimum amount for the fire trucks to access where we have no parking.

00:51:50.240 --> 00:52:00.240
 The group here, when they came in, we had two different codes, and we said you're not going to be allowed to park on the street if you come in with this.

00:52:00.240 --> 00:52:11.240
 So that's another factor that might come into play, is that the lots will be a little bit smaller than what's existing. There may not be as much parking on street that they need, so there could be some overflow onto Hinkle.

00:52:11.240 --> 00:52:20.240
 The other item that was brought up last night in conversation was that we've got Brookdale as a senior development, as well as Good Sam on the east side.

00:52:20.240 --> 00:52:23.240
 I can't see too far from here, so look at this screen.

00:52:23.240 --> 00:52:34.240
 What was brought up last night, which I haven't observed because I'm usually here at the city, is that when there's activities, family night, there's not quite enough parking for Brookdale, so they'll actually use the street parking.

00:52:34.240 --> 00:52:38.240
 And I don't observe that. I'm not there during the times.

00:52:38.240 --> 00:52:45.240
 As well as Good Sam, I believe they have sufficient parking, but they're under construction now, so it's possible the equipment might be parking on the road is what people are seeing.

00:52:45.240 --> 00:52:56.240
 But there are some opportunities for some input that we received last night that, as Preetam said, we weren't aware of when we made this recommendation.

00:52:56.240 --> 00:53:01.240
 So the citizens have really helped us out, understand a little bit better what's going on during the day.

00:53:01.240 --> 00:53:07.240
 It's not a traditional parking, and when you come home from work, you park on the street, or your kids are parking on the street.

00:53:07.240 --> 00:53:09.240
 It's a slightly different use.

00:53:09.240 --> 00:53:14.240
 So I'll be glad to answer any questions from anything, or I'll be glad to turn it back over.

00:53:14.240 --> 00:53:19.240
 >> You said there was going to be an entrance off Hinkle from Mimosa?

00:53:19.240 --> 00:53:20.240
 >> It's going to be right here.

00:53:20.240 --> 00:53:21.240
 >> Okay.

00:53:21.240 --> 00:53:25.240
 >> That's the one main point of access that will be, it's the point of access.

00:53:25.240 --> 00:53:28.240
 >> So there will be no other streets north of that?

00:53:28.240 --> 00:53:29.240
 >> No.

00:53:29.240 --> 00:53:30.240
 >> Connecting into Hinkle?

00:53:30.240 --> 00:53:34.240
 >> One connection to Hinkle, yes, sir, and then there was going to be one connection.

00:53:34.240 --> 00:53:41.240
 Some of the conversations that were brought up, people are concerned about traffic cutting straight through Mimosa and getting to Carroll.

00:53:41.240 --> 00:53:47.240
 They're upset with that a little bit, and they wanted to have it offset and have maybe the street mid-block.

00:53:47.240 --> 00:53:53.240
 The problem with that mid-block is that people are, you've got the bicycle lanes, you've got the sidewalk connections and whatnot.

00:53:53.240 --> 00:53:55.240
 We kind of want to line the streets up.

00:53:55.240 --> 00:54:01.240
 It's desirable for traffic flow, it's desirable to control the complex points.

00:54:01.240 --> 00:54:08.240
 So offsetting that, it isn't a traditional favored alignment.

00:54:08.240 --> 00:54:17.240
 We understood what they were trying to get to, but if somebody's turning out here, they believe that if you offset the alignment, it'll slow them down from here.

00:54:17.240 --> 00:54:19.240
 The opposition was on the other end of the street.

00:54:19.240 --> 00:54:23.240
 They said, well, they'll just make up lost time and speed at the other end of my street.

00:54:23.240 --> 00:54:31.240
 So we've opened up some neighborhood meeting discussions with them saying if we want to come back and look at traffic calming, this is a long stretch of road going through there.

00:54:31.240 --> 00:54:38.240
 So they said that they were interested in some of our neighborhood meetings at Pre-Tem started over the past couple months.

00:54:38.240 --> 00:54:40.240
 So just the one point.

00:54:40.240 --> 00:54:42.240
 So there will be homes fronting Hankel?

00:54:42.240 --> 00:54:46.240
 No, no, no, just one street, one street access.

00:54:46.240 --> 00:54:50.240
 Okay. But no homes with driveways out onto Hankel?

00:54:50.240 --> 00:54:51.240
 No, sir.

00:54:51.240 --> 00:54:54.240
 Why do they need parking if that's going to be that one access?

00:54:54.240 --> 00:54:57.240
 Inside the neighborhood, there won't be on-street parking.

00:54:57.240 --> 00:55:04.240
 There's going to be limited on-street parking because the widths of the roadways they'll have, they're not going to be wide enough.

00:55:04.240 --> 00:55:09.240
 As we were mentioning on Bernard, the road widths are not wide enough to allow for the fire.

00:55:09.240 --> 00:55:12.240
 When they came through, we had a different cross section.

00:55:12.240 --> 00:55:14.240
 They built and designed towards that.

00:55:14.240 --> 00:55:20.240
 The design standards change where we said we would not permit, you can roll a curb, you can make it wider with a rolled curb.

00:55:20.240 --> 00:55:23.240
 The response from the developer said it's too late to change anything.

00:55:23.240 --> 00:55:27.240
 We're not going to widen it and we're not going to change our curb width. We'll just do no parking.

00:55:27.240 --> 00:55:32.240
 So it was their choice to have no parking on their streets.

00:55:32.240 --> 00:55:36.240
 But they'd have to walk out of the subdivision essentially to get to parking?

00:55:36.240 --> 00:55:38.240
 Yeah.

00:55:38.240 --> 00:55:42.240
 I'm also quite, I'd be interested to see how often that actually happens, right?

00:55:42.240 --> 00:55:48.240
 Because people tend, especially when they're used to parking right in front of a place, not to park anywhere unless it's in front of that place.

00:55:48.240 --> 00:55:53.240
 They would often give up going on their location as opposed to.

00:55:53.240 --> 00:55:57.240
 I wonder if that, will that be used?

00:55:57.240 --> 00:56:03.240
 I guess my bigger question too is one of the best ways to, if we're conceiving a traffic problem and other things,

00:56:03.240 --> 00:56:08.240
 a great way to do it is to get people out of their cars and quit driving because cars are traffic.

00:56:08.240 --> 00:56:12.240
 And so bike lanes would be one thing that would potentially help with this.

00:56:12.240 --> 00:56:23.240
 And so I'm sure there's a solution here, but I would hate in a city like Denton where we just really don't have bike infrastructure hardly at all to totally lose it.

00:56:23.240 --> 00:56:27.240
 So that's what I'm curious about is what solutions do we have?

00:56:27.240 --> 00:56:30.240
 We can accommodate both to that end.

00:56:30.240 --> 00:56:37.240
 The other thing I want to point out is this area is going to be completely updated through a parks project.

00:56:37.240 --> 00:56:44.240
 There's going to be tennis courts, there's going to be, there's one tiny building here, there's going to be additional buildings and facilities.

00:56:44.240 --> 00:56:47.240
 And they're going to have a parking lot internally.

00:56:47.240 --> 00:56:56.240
 But if parking is allowed on this particular segment, it would support overflow parking for events or tournaments or what's going on.

00:56:56.240 --> 00:57:09.240
 So that's the other angle to keep in mind that this would serve a purpose of attracting more people to this center as it grows.

00:57:09.240 --> 00:57:13.240
 >> Okay, and there's parking on both sides of Hankel right now, right?

00:57:13.240 --> 00:57:15.240
 >> Right now, it's parking is only on one side.

00:57:15.240 --> 00:57:16.240
 >> Only on one side.

00:57:16.240 --> 00:57:17.240
 >> Correct.

00:57:17.240 --> 00:57:19.240
 >> It's on the west side.

00:57:19.240 --> 00:57:20.240
 >> It's on the west side, correct.

00:57:20.240 --> 00:57:21.240
 West side.

00:57:21.240 --> 00:57:23.240
 >> And there's bike lanes on both sides there, right?

00:57:23.240 --> 00:57:24.240
 >> Correct.

00:57:24.240 --> 00:57:29.240
 >> Which of course we, I mean, I can't imagine most people know those are bike lanes based on the lines and everything.

00:57:29.240 --> 00:57:30.240
 >> Right, right.

00:57:30.240 --> 00:57:32.240
 >> It's very, I can see how it all would be confusing.

00:57:32.240 --> 00:57:33.240
 Yeah, the striping is not very good.

00:57:33.240 --> 00:57:38.240
 >> We'll make sure that it's done better once it's completed.

00:57:38.240 --> 00:57:42.240
 >> What about, and I'm just, I don't know what the width of bike lanes have to be or what their requirement is there.

00:57:42.240 --> 00:57:46.240
 Because I don't, I wouldn't expect this to be an especially high volume for biking.

00:57:46.240 --> 00:57:56.240
 Is there the possibility where you have two-way bike lane going right next to each other, potentially with cars parked as a buffer between and then the two lanes on the other side?

00:57:56.240 --> 00:57:58.240
 >> That's a possible option.

00:57:58.240 --> 00:58:04.240
 One of the issues with two-way bike lanes is expectations at driveways and intersections.

00:58:04.240 --> 00:58:08.240
 People don't usually look at, they only look one side or one direction.

00:58:08.240 --> 00:58:10.240
 They don't look at the other direction.

00:58:10.240 --> 00:58:18.240
 If you have a two-way, there's extensive signage, extensive education component associated.

00:58:18.240 --> 00:58:22.240
 And then we have to make sure that it's done in a safe manner, so.

00:58:22.240 --> 00:58:23.240
 >> Okay.

00:58:23.240 --> 00:58:29.240
 >> Yes, it is a possibility, but it's much more involved.

00:58:29.240 --> 00:58:35.240
 >> Because then you're also not, your bike, you're not going in the same direction as the traffic if you have it on both sides.

00:58:35.240 --> 00:58:44.240
 [ Inaudible ]

00:58:44.240 --> 00:58:48.240
 >> It seems like this is really still up in the air, right?

00:58:48.240 --> 00:58:54.240
 I mean, the project, the possibility of the parking.

00:58:54.240 --> 00:59:03.240
 >> Yes, based on the input that we've received, we may go a different direction and we may not come back to request restriction of parking.

00:59:03.240 --> 00:59:16.240
 >> Okay. But it also seems like if the Hinkle is going to have a major facelift with that development over there on the west side,

00:59:16.240 --> 00:59:32.240
 that there could be some good creative ways to really protect the bike lane while leaving parking where it serves the residents on the south side.

00:59:32.240 --> 00:59:38.240
 Just, again, be creative along the way, but also protect the bike lane well.

00:59:38.240 --> 00:59:40.240
 >> Correct.

00:59:40.240 --> 00:59:50.240
 >> Yeah, I think you have an option here to be creative and create a demonstration project for future bicycle infrastructure.

00:59:50.240 --> 01:00:03.240
 Like the bicycle lane by the curb with cars. >> With buffered car parking. >> With cars buffering or put in some bollards or whatever to make it protective.

01:00:03.240 --> 01:00:10.240
 It's a good opportunity to do a demonstration project.

01:00:10.240 --> 01:00:16.240
 >> Isn't there going to be, wasn't there going to be water mains put underneath there too?

01:00:16.240 --> 01:00:32.240
 >> Correct. So it's a storm drain project. It's drainage. And then the streets will go in and redo the street pavements.

01:00:32.240 --> 01:00:39.240
 >> Is there anything else you want to say? It sounds like we're just going to leave stuff for a while.

01:00:39.240 --> 01:00:49.240
 >> Yes, and if there will be more public meetings, they will door hang. Yeah, leave your information with pre-tem.

01:00:49.240 --> 01:00:59.240
 >> Yes. You can leave the information with Becky and then we can reach out to if there's anything happening in this area.

01:00:59.240 --> 01:01:07.240
 >> Right. And you go into the record. So it will be official. Okay. Thank you. Thank you. Okay.

01:01:07.240 --> 01:01:23.240
 >> So the direction is, yeah. >> Just hang loose. >> Table the item, yes. >> Right. Is that an official direction we can take? Hang loose and wait for, wait for what's going to happen. Yeah.

01:01:23.240 --> 01:01:36.240
 Okay. That brings us, I really do think that we could do something really good with that. And something that could serve as a template for future development.

01:01:36.240 --> 01:01:51.240
 >> All right. That brings us to ETSC 18-053, which is staff reports, including the matrix.

01:01:51.240 --> 01:02:01.240
 >> Some of the items we've already brought forward and we want to take it off of the list. I want to quickly jump to the ones that we want to take off of the list.

01:02:01.240 --> 01:02:09.240
 And then go into the ones that are here that we'll bring back in the next couple meetings.

01:02:09.240 --> 01:02:15.240
 But number two, I think small area plan is almost wrapped up. That's what I heard in P and Z.

01:02:15.240 --> 01:02:28.240
 >> The council has, it's been moved from council next week. >> Oh, okay. >> We were supposed to go to council. It was approved last night, six to zero at planning and zoning.

01:02:28.240 --> 01:02:38.240
 We were supposed to go to council next Tuesday, but it has been withdrawn from the agenda. >> Okay. >> For next week. The hope will be we'll be back in January.

01:02:38.240 --> 01:02:45.240
 >> Okay. But I did hear that there are several options as far as parking. They're creating parking zones and parking things. >> Yeah. Yeah.

01:02:45.240 --> 01:03:02.240
 >> So I think this Marietta Street in between Oak and Scripture is a perfect street for this particular plan to be implemented. So we can bring it back. But for now, I mean, it's been on the list for a while and we're closing the small area plan pretty much.

01:03:02.240 --> 01:03:16.240
 >> Right. >> Okay. Old Alton Road. That was an issue where they were crossing Teasley across to get to Geyer High School. They were parking on Old Alton.

01:03:16.240 --> 01:03:41.240
 A temporary city worked with TxDOT and installed a temporary signal and a pedestrian signal. And we're working closely with the ISD, Geyer principal, as well as TxDOT to monitor that operation for the pedestrians. So I would like to take this off. It seems it's been addressed.

01:03:41.240 --> 01:04:10.240
 McKinney sidewalk. That's number six. That one is already on a list of projects. It's 2018 design sidewalk. I'm sorry, 2018 sidewalk package, which is currently under design and which will be going to construction early, middle to around summertime, I would say, early spring, late spring, early summer.

01:04:10.240 --> 01:04:30.240
 And we're wrapping up certain design elements. But yeah, we understand that this sidewalk on McKinney right across from here is on it and will be designed and implemented soon. So I want to, I think it's already going to happen, but we can bring it back. If nothing happens in the next six months, we can talk about it.

01:04:30.240 --> 01:04:50.240
 So we'll be on you. But number, item number eight, we've talked about the, we brought an item forward and we went through discussion. Why, why not? How you want to take that out? And then those are the ones that I want to take out.

01:04:50.240 --> 01:05:19.240
 The station motors, number nine at McKinney. We have contacted enforcement. It is more on a community improvement services that they need to enforce it better. We are working on delineating the right of ways because it's, lines are blurred in that area where the actual property owner doesn't understand where their property line starts and they've striped it and marked it.

01:05:19.240 --> 01:05:35.240
 It could be within a city right of way or so it's a bigger involved process to get through the right of way and understand who's owning what property instead of just going in and say, just remove your cars that are on the sidewalk. It's more of now we have to establish the right of way.

01:05:35.240 --> 01:05:55.240
 So it's involved and it's taking a lot longer. So I'm just giving an update that that's where we're at. Temporary improvements to Hickory for bike lanes until the project is complete. I think we're looking at tabs or some other temporary paint.

01:05:55.240 --> 01:06:17.240
 The project is under design which should go to construction pretty soon in the next three to four months. So hopefully we can get there but with the winter months it becomes a tough job to paint anything. It doesn't really catch. There are wet days so it becomes a, are you throwing your money away kind of deal.

01:06:17.240 --> 01:06:32.240
 So it's I think and part of that was lighting. Yes. So lights are coming and then that intersection at Hickory and Carol. I think we're there was a resident meeting with council members. I think you were there. Okay.

01:06:32.240 --> 01:06:58.240
 Organize that one. You organized. Okay. And part of the response was there are four intersections that are right. In fact, they're really low in lighting. And what we want to do is look at, at a minimum, how can we improve the intensity of the bulbs. I mean, put a larger bulb in there instead of 250 watt. How about 400 watt. I mean, that's a start.

01:06:58.240 --> 01:07:13.240
 And then we'll see if there are other locations we can install lights when the feasibility of, for example, Bell and Hickory what's the feasibility of using the corner where Weldon used to be, because that's the darkest corner.

01:07:13.240 --> 01:07:33.240
 That corner and the right of way is so close and narrow that we can install a pole there. So we're looking at feasibility in the long term. But in the short term we want to intensify all the lighting and there are several locations within the downtown area and there are several locations on the university that we're getting questions about.

01:07:33.240 --> 01:08:02.240
 And I would, I would say that a lot of lighting is simply scale, because the lights are so high up on those poles that there's a lot of light up there. But there are, it's not pedestrian or bike or even really, you know, city vehicle city, you know, vehicular traffic scale, because you've got a lot of stuff going on up here, not as much going on down here.

01:08:02.240 --> 01:08:14.240
 So, okay, we recently went to council with a light study. It was a feasibility for light street lighting along us 380.

01:08:14.240 --> 01:08:37.240
 It was between I-35 and Mayhill, a 5.4 mile stretch, and we looked at how can we provide continuous lighting, and what are the, what's there today, and what needs to be there. And that's the study that was presented to council, the direction we received was to move forward with design, which is close to half a million dollars.

01:08:37.240 --> 01:08:44.240
 So we can bring that item and present it to you to understand what are we doing. So I'll bring that item.

01:08:44.240 --> 01:09:13.240
 If I can just briefly talk about why that meeting commenced real quickly, and I'd just also like to, on the record, give a lot of props to Keely Briggs, District 2, and Gerard Hutzabat, District 1, who met on a whim when, it basically came after concern. We had a citizen hit, crossing the street, hit and run. But anyone who's spent much time crossing that intersection at Carroll and Hickory knows it's dangerous, and there's a lot of pedestrian activity. There should be. It's between the square and UNT. We should want more than even there is.

01:09:13.240 --> 01:09:30.240
 And so we brainstormed ways to make it safer. It is a really constructive meeting with a lot of ideas about possibilities. And a lot of things, you know, are good planning. And so it was really good. But we basically identified two areas as being really problematic for pedestrians that we actually control still.

01:09:30.240 --> 01:09:56.240
 And that was from Oak to Mulberry on Carroll as being an area that how can we slow down traffic on those two basically two blocks where you're going to have way more pedestrians than the rest of that road and then from and then over by DCTA basically from you could probably from Mulberry to McKinney even there about slowing those two areas.

01:09:56.240 --> 01:10:07.240
 So it was a really productive discussion. It was great. And I hope we can help in that. So I know that I think they wanted us to mention that in the meeting that they're working on that too.

01:10:07.240 --> 01:10:10.240
 Yes. Thank you for organizing that one.

01:10:10.240 --> 01:10:23.240
 Yeah, I always think that pedestrians and I cross at Hickory if I'm in my office and I come downtown for you to the development center for meeting. It's a quick 13 minute walk.

01:10:23.240 --> 01:10:33.240
 But I always think that because of all the infrastructure at those cross at those crossings pedestrian pedestrians look out of scale.

01:10:33.240 --> 01:10:55.240
 They look tiny. And so I understand that part of it is absolutely street with but I think there could be a lot of ways that we could start bringing it down so that we see things and we see people because otherwise everything that is so, you know, so tall.

01:10:55.240 --> 01:11:09.240
 And then there's anybody people stand in there and you know when I'm standing there how tiny I must look. But if there are ways to start just bringing streetlights down bring you know more trees if possible.

01:11:09.240 --> 01:11:16.240
 We, we had one of the people that came was a we two librarians come and they're tremendous researchers if you didn't know.

01:11:16.240 --> 01:11:29.240
 And so one of the librarians she's at TWU she really prepared like did research and prepared an excellent report of options. That's just really helpful and imagining possibilities and so I'm not going to go over all those because that would take a while, but it's really incredible.

01:11:29.240 --> 01:11:37.240
 It's probably like seven eight options good options to slow down traffic in those those blocks. So I hope we can move on those.

01:11:37.240 --> 01:11:50.240
 So we are working on the rest of the items and we'll slowly bring these back as they become or agendize them so that we can have a bigger discussion or give you a quick update that will fix this or not fix this or why.

01:11:50.240 --> 01:11:57.240
 So if there are any other items you want to add that's I was gonna make one clarification on seven.

01:11:57.240 --> 01:12:08.240
 This is how long these things take right so that sushi business went out of business a while ago I'm sure everyone knows where that is but that's where yes it's just off of where the is it what's the breakfast place their Park Hill.

01:12:08.240 --> 01:12:12.240
 I know you don't talk about yeah is it something like that.

01:12:12.240 --> 01:12:29.240
 Yeah. So okay I just want to make sure you knew because that I know exactly what the location is and what we're working on that one is we're trying to look at designing and implementing 88 compliant Rams and we're conducting an 88 transition plan.

01:12:29.240 --> 01:12:55.240
 It will be part of that because that plan will actually identify the cost and prioritize areas where it's highly used by and highly highly pedestrian active areas so that would give us enough ammunition if you may to move to council and say hey these are the areas we really need to focus on and need money for.

01:12:55.240 --> 01:13:00.240
 So that's where we're at.

01:13:00.240 --> 01:13:18.240
 For the for the new one I have one addition and one quick question. So the addition is a very almost the exact same thing as that one by the formerly by the sushi place where we're just mentioned across the street from Dusty's if you know where Dusty's is on.

01:13:18.240 --> 01:13:35.240
 Yes it's on Elm right across the streets exact same situation short little island with no you know basically everything else around it you could get around on a wheelchair but you would literally just have to stop and roll into the street to get around it so it's the same situation.

01:13:35.240 --> 01:13:49.240
 Very simple. I don't think but so it's directly across the street from Dusty's is where you can see that. And then one question Keely Briggs actually actually asked me to bring this up we talked about this on the square.

01:13:49.240 --> 01:14:12.240
 Right now I think you have to press the button to do it. I've really noticed real delays like I've sat through two lights I walked up and maybe I pressed it right right before right before and I've been sitting through like two light cycles you're just standing there forever as pedestrian why cars are going and so I don't know if it's something we could look at she asked about even with that is there a possibility of it being more automatic or something so she wanted me to bring that up.

01:14:12.240 --> 01:14:35.240
 So, yes she's brought that up. We're looking into actual ADA compliance laws because we, when we upgraded the intersections we made them a compliant meaning a visually impaired person comes up to comes up to the intersection, and he does not know which direction is going.

01:14:35.240 --> 01:14:54.240
 So, it becomes a hassle for that particular person to figure it out if all the directions are moving all the time, and figure out which direction to cross so ADA compliance, make sure that once you hit the button the sound starts and you start receiving sound from the other end.

01:14:54.240 --> 01:15:10.240
 And that's why so we're trying to find out if there is a middle ground where it can activate when an ADA or visually impaired person walks in, it can activate and do the whole audio thing.

01:15:10.240 --> 01:15:28.240
 At the same time it can go into a continuous pedestrian place so we're finding out if by doing that, are we not, are we compliant or not compliant so we've asked the question once we find out well, I'll let everyone.

01:15:28.240 --> 01:15:46.240
 Anybody else have anything one. I have a question I've been here on a short time so maybe this is probably already come up but I'm curious. When you're on a bike, and you come up to an intersection, and there's no one else around, I often rely on automobiles to trigger the signal for me.

01:15:46.240 --> 01:15:58.240
 So, is there, isn't there something that can help along that line. Yes, some of the older signals in the in and around the unit area that don't have it yet.

01:15:58.240 --> 01:16:15.240
 But the new detection system on all the intersections that we're now replacing picks up bike is not the loop based it's not the in pavement, but these are more of radar base so it, it just catches any movement it's motion based.

01:16:15.240 --> 01:16:27.240
 So when you come in it doesn't matter the size is motion, and then there is a camera also associated with it so yes new intersections will catch a bike or smart smaller vehicle.

01:16:27.240 --> 01:16:49.240
 The older ones were in the process slowly replacing them, but it's going to take a while to get all of the intersections. Good to know. Thanks. Have you ever jumped up and down.

01:16:49.240 --> 01:17:02.240
 We're getting off balance here, simply because pre temp took off a bunch. Keep the balance. Keep the balance, but I'll add on more.

01:17:02.240 --> 01:17:13.240
 Well as I observed a significant traffic accident at Old North University today. Okay. I was wondering how the report from the police is coming.

01:17:13.240 --> 01:17:20.240
 I haven't today. Today's accident. Yeah, they had an accident this afternoon. It was pretty, pretty good one.

01:17:20.240 --> 01:17:35.240
 I have not seen the report, but I can request it and provide a response as to what was the cause and what happened. I can provide that. Well, I'm not necessarily interested in that particular one, but you know we're wanting to get a report so that we can look at.

01:17:35.240 --> 01:17:50.240
 Yes, all the areas that are being the type of accidents where they're occurring. Correct. If there's anything we can help with. So I've asked PD and one of the real issues with the way they have set it up.

01:17:50.240 --> 01:18:11.240
 Their reports are not easily. They're scanned in. So you can't really search them as far as, okay, what type of accident, what really caused it. So someone really has to go in and create a report. Okay, this is what happened. So I have asked for an annual report or a incident location where there are more incidents.

01:18:11.240 --> 01:18:34.240
 But when I got the information back, it didn't come with, what was the cause. So it's hard to come up with a solution if we don't know what is the cause or what type of accidents are happening. Are they broadsided? Are they head on collisions? Are they people failing to yield or people under influence?

01:18:34.240 --> 01:18:47.240
 So we don't know the details when we get there. So I'm working with PD to get better information. That's why it's on the matrix, but I understand they're having some troubles with setting up the software.

01:18:47.240 --> 01:19:06.240
 Once we have a report, I'll get an annual last, at least a year of data as far as what are the most, what are the locations where the accidents are very frequent. I think highest on the list was 380 at 35.

01:19:06.240 --> 01:19:18.240
 And I think there's one on loop 288. So there were a couple on loop 288 actually. So those have high volumes and obviously they have high accident rates.

01:19:18.240 --> 01:19:38.240
 Will this be sorted by motor vehicle, pedestrian, bicycle? Yes, exactly. So mostly I'm focusing on pedestrian and bicycle accidents. That way we start with that because those are most fatal or injury oriented ones.

01:19:38.240 --> 01:19:54.240
 Okay, anybody else have anything? And with that, we will adjourn at 6.52. And that's it. See everybody in January.