1 00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:12,400 All right hello everyone welcome to our sustainability framework advisory 2 00:00:12,400 --> 00:00:19,140 committee we are in the City Council work session room today Friday March 25th 2022 3 00:00:19,140 --> 00:00:26,160 and it is 1 p.m. we will begin with our first item for individual consideration 4 00:00:26,160 --> 00:00:33,180 consider approval of the February 25th 2022 minutes it looks like they have 5 00:00:33,180 --> 00:00:38,880 been corrected does everyone have a chance to review those any comments on 6 00:00:38,880 --> 00:00:47,480 anything all right I will accept a motion Ed a second Brent all right all 7 00:00:47,480 --> 00:00:53,640 in favor say aye aye all right so we will move on to our second item for 8 00:00:53,640 --> 00:00:57,960 individual consideration receive a report call the discussion and give 9 00:00:57,960 --> 00:01:03,480 staff feedback on regional greenhouse gas inventory update and greenhouse gas 10 00:01:03,480 --> 00:01:13,160 inventory methods comparison we missed you last time JT happy to be here this 11 00:01:13,160 --> 00:01:20,040 time so good afternoon committee members my name is James Douglas I'm the 12 00:01:20,040 --> 00:01:24,360 conservation programs coordinator and as you stated today we will be talking 13 00:01:24,360 --> 00:01:29,800 about the greenhouse gas inventory specifically with some methods 14 00:01:29,800 --> 00:01:35,360 comparison and some methods updates for you and so today we will go over the 15 00:01:35,360 --> 00:01:40,120 background as a way of refresher we will talk about the North Central Texas 16 00:01:40,120 --> 00:01:44,800 Council of Governments regional cohort for greenhouse gas inventories we'll go 17 00:01:44,800 --> 00:01:50,600 over that methodology comparison talk about where we're at with our current 18 00:01:50,600 --> 00:01:55,800 methodology and our current progress on that cohort and then we will go over 19 00:01:55,800 --> 00:02:02,960 some options that staff is considering and some potential next steps so just 20 00:02:02,960 --> 00:02:08,200 by way of reminder the greenhouse gas inventory process began in 2011 and 21 00:02:08,200 --> 00:02:12,960 during that year a baseline was retroactively calculated for the year 22 00:02:12,960 --> 00:02:19,360 2006 in the year 2015 staff began calculating the greenhouse gas inventory 23 00:02:19,360 --> 00:02:24,880 annually and just as a reminder we can think of the greenhouse gas inventory as 24 00:02:24,880 --> 00:02:30,120 an analysis of the city's carbon footprint we do that in two scopes we do 25 00:02:30,120 --> 00:02:34,360 that at the community level so that includes residents all transportation 26 00:02:34,360 --> 00:02:38,640 within the city and then we do that at the level of just municipal operations 27 00:02:38,640 --> 00:02:46,580 to get a sense of what the city's carbon footprint is this aids in 28 00:02:46,580 --> 00:02:50,400 conservation efforts so through the inventory data collection process we 29 00:02:50,400 --> 00:02:56,340 look at energy we look at water we look at natural gas and so all of these 30 00:02:56,340 --> 00:03:00,920 things help in our conservation efforts of those natural resources we also 31 00:03:00,920 --> 00:03:05,700 report those results annually through the city's sustainability reporting to 32 00:03:05,700 --> 00:03:12,120 CDP which was formerly the carbon disclosure project moving now into the 33 00:03:12,120 --> 00:03:16,240 North Central Texas Council of Governments cohort this is a regional 34 00:03:16,240 --> 00:03:21,700 collaboration of 12 cities plus the cog and it started in 2020 with the goal of 35 00:03:21,700 --> 00:03:28,560 creating a 2019 greenhouse gas inventory for all 12 of those cities plus the 16 36 00:03:28,560 --> 00:03:34,480 county region this is one of only a handful of projects in the United States 37 00:03:34,480 --> 00:03:39,360 that is looking at greenhouse gas inventories on a regional level as well 38 00:03:39,360 --> 00:03:44,760 as all of those cities that are encompassed within it one benefit of 39 00:03:44,760 --> 00:03:49,480 this is it standardizes regional methods across the board so prior to this only 40 00:03:49,480 --> 00:03:54,080 three cities in the North Texas region had inventories that was Denton Dallas 41 00:03:54,080 --> 00:03:59,040 and Plano and so this helps all 12 of those cities kind of compare apples to 42 00:03:59,040 --> 00:04:03,800 apples we're all operating off of the same playbook it also increases 43 00:04:03,800 --> 00:04:08,360 awareness of greenhouse gas emissions in the area and as far as the North 44 00:04:08,360 --> 00:04:11,840 Central Texas Council of Governments is concerned this helps them with their 45 00:04:11,840 --> 00:04:16,440 regional planning efforts around transportation and air quality and there 46 00:04:16,440 --> 00:04:20,840 are many many air pollutants that are co-emitted with greenhouse gas 47 00:04:20,840 --> 00:04:25,400 emissions some of those are ozone precursors particular matter things like 48 00:04:25,400 --> 00:04:30,920 that and so from from that stance that's something that the the region is looking 49 00:04:30,920 --> 00:04:36,560 at that relationship and this cohort was introduced by the regional integration of 50 00:04:36,560 --> 00:04:40,720 sustainability efforts or rise which is a collaboration of North Texas cities 51 00:04:40,720 --> 00:04:51,520 that is hosted at them at the cog so the methodology changes are that best 52 00:04:51,520 --> 00:04:57,200 described in the table in exhibit 2 that's included in your backup a brief 53 00:04:57,200 --> 00:05:02,880 summary of that the original methodology that the city of Denton has used from 54 00:05:02,880 --> 00:05:08,960 2006 up until present is related to the equally US community protocols this 55 00:05:08,960 --> 00:05:14,360 covers five basic categories of metrics to complete an inventory that includes 56 00:05:14,360 --> 00:05:20,360 18 unique metrics that sustainability staff goes out collects analyzes and 57 00:05:20,360 --> 00:05:27,160 produces that annual report the regional methodology has expanded that scope so 58 00:05:27,160 --> 00:05:32,040 the North Central Texas Council of Governments they have additional staff 59 00:05:32,040 --> 00:05:36,000 and additional access to different data sets that exist at the regional level 60 00:05:36,000 --> 00:05:40,800 that might not exist at the city level and for that reason that that scope is 61 00:05:40,800 --> 00:05:45,840 able to be expanded a little bit so between the two methodologies we're 62 00:05:45,840 --> 00:05:51,720 moving from 18 individual metrics to 33 individual metrics and so that's an 63 00:05:51,720 --> 00:05:58,520 example is expanded transportation so previously those models were available 64 00:05:58,520 --> 00:06:04,080 for on-road transportation those models have been expanded and so additional 65 00:06:04,080 --> 00:06:10,800 off-road transportation things like aviation will now be included in this 66 00:06:10,800 --> 00:06:19,280 expanded scope and the as I said the Council of Governments and those 12 67 00:06:19,280 --> 00:06:25,960 cities are looking at a 2019 baseline this is the most comparable year for for 68 00:06:25,960 --> 00:06:31,600 future inventories that isn't going to be impacted by the data changes due to 69 00:06:31,600 --> 00:06:37,600 COVID-19 so 2020 and 2021 are going to be you know not the ones that we want to 70 00:06:37,600 --> 00:06:46,040 compare to when we're talking about sort of the standard operations so this is 71 00:06:46,040 --> 00:06:51,300 the current progress based on that 2019 baseline so this is for both the city of 72 00:06:51,300 --> 00:06:58,440 Denton and for the regional inventory the COG has been collecting data at the 73 00:06:58,440 --> 00:07:03,440 regional level and then parsing it out into the individual cities which helps a 74 00:07:03,440 --> 00:07:07,280 lot for some of these larger data sets some of the remaining metrics that we 75 00:07:07,280 --> 00:07:11,360 still have are that off-road transportation piece and some of the 76 00:07:11,360 --> 00:07:16,240 metrics related to water and wastewater this is once again at a regional level 77 00:07:16,240 --> 00:07:21,080 collection things like nitrogen discharge or something that isn't quite 78 00:07:21,080 --> 00:07:25,240 readily available and so the COG is going out and looking for those data sets 79 00:07:25,240 --> 00:07:31,160 with each individual water and wastewater treatment plan the expected 80 00:07:31,160 --> 00:07:36,680 date for all of that data is June 2022 and staff will be turning around that 81 00:07:36,680 --> 00:07:41,400 2019 report in association with the regional cohort as quickly as possible 82 00:07:41,400 --> 00:07:47,040 following that data acquisition the regional inventory will also have its 83 00:07:47,040 --> 00:07:53,600 own report associated with it for the 16 County region that will be done as as 84 00:07:53,600 --> 00:07:57,440 soon as the COG staff is able there's going to be a little bit more data 85 00:07:57,440 --> 00:08:02,880 analysis with those larger data sets and then for each individual city they will 86 00:08:02,880 --> 00:08:11,640 be producing their reports on their own timelines so these are the options that 87 00:08:11,640 --> 00:08:16,160 staff is considering moving forward so we have our previous methodology that 88 00:08:16,160 --> 00:08:21,720 we've used up into 2019 so we do have a 2019 inventory that is based on the 89 00:08:21,720 --> 00:08:26,440 previous methodology we'll have a 2019 inventory based on new methodology so 90 00:08:26,440 --> 00:08:31,040 we'll have a nice comparison there to look at but moving forward the previous 91 00:08:31,040 --> 00:08:37,000 methodology offers a smaller scope but a faster turnaround time so that's 92 00:08:37,000 --> 00:08:40,120 something that could be done hypothetically on an annual basis as 93 00:08:40,120 --> 00:08:44,360 we've been doing some of those inputs will be estimated and not actual 94 00:08:44,360 --> 00:08:49,200 because data sets are not generated necessarily on an annual basis for some 95 00:08:49,200 --> 00:08:53,800 of those larger data sets when we're talking about the new methodology 96 00:08:53,800 --> 00:08:58,400 obviously it's a larger scope a little bit more intensive for that and so that 97 00:08:58,400 --> 00:09:02,520 can be calculated on a two to three year basis depending on where we get the 98 00:09:02,520 --> 00:09:08,240 maximum overlap of data availability actual data availability as I said 99 00:09:08,240 --> 00:09:15,760 that's an expanded scope 33 individual metrics and the as we're creating sort 100 00:09:15,760 --> 00:09:21,320 of these connections through the COG and as they reach out for this data the idea 101 00:09:21,320 --> 00:09:25,800 is that the next collection of that data will go a little bit more smoothly once 102 00:09:25,800 --> 00:09:30,400 those connections have been established and then with the new methodology of 103 00:09:30,400 --> 00:09:33,520 course that will be in line with regional estimates for cities that 104 00:09:33,520 --> 00:09:41,160 continue to pursue the greenhouse gas inventory on a on a biannual basis 105 00:09:41,160 --> 00:09:46,920 so these are the next steps that we're looking at we will be completing the 106 00:09:46,920 --> 00:09:53,800 2019 inventory with the new methodology June 2022 and however long the analysis 107 00:09:53,800 --> 00:09:59,040 takes after that should be within the summer and those results and the 108 00:09:59,040 --> 00:10:04,360 comparison to the old methodology will be presented to this body with that we 109 00:10:04,360 --> 00:10:09,160 will begin work on the 2021 inventory following the new methodology and 110 00:10:09,160 --> 00:10:14,360 continuing with that expanded scope we expect that that many of those data 111 00:10:14,360 --> 00:10:18,760 sources for example the new transportation model that the COG was 112 00:10:18,760 --> 00:10:22,600 able to create specifically for this project will continue to be available 113 00:10:22,600 --> 00:10:28,440 and so we'll be able to do that that same methodology for 2021 and then we 114 00:10:28,440 --> 00:10:32,360 will be considering updating the 2018 inventory which is the current baseline 115 00:10:32,360 --> 00:10:38,600 and if we will continue with this new methodology we will want either the 2018 116 00:10:38,600 --> 00:10:43,400 inventory to be brought up to that same scope or the 2019 inventory to be 117 00:10:43,400 --> 00:10:48,680 labeled as the new baseline for future comparison and so that is currently 118 00:10:48,680 --> 00:10:53,080 where we stand and I will take any questions that you have anybody have 119 00:10:53,080 --> 00:11:02,000 questions I'd like more if you can give me some more information between the 120 00:11:02,000 --> 00:11:12,440 advantage of collecting every two to three years so you're saying that that 121 00:11:12,440 --> 00:11:21,560 rather than then doing it annually we'll do it over a two year or three year 122 00:11:21,560 --> 00:11:27,360 window and you say the advantages of that one of them is that it's a wider 123 00:11:27,360 --> 00:11:33,280 scope and so can you explain what that wider scope is sure so if you take a 124 00:11:33,280 --> 00:11:39,920 look at exhibit two you'll see those individual metrics are listed there so 125 00:11:39,920 --> 00:11:44,240 the wider scope includes every single one of those metrics are you talking 126 00:11:44,240 --> 00:11:49,280 about this yes yep so those emission metrics on the right-hand side the 127 00:11:49,280 --> 00:11:54,400 wider scope includes all of those metrics the previous scope is going to 128 00:11:54,400 --> 00:11:59,360 be the metrics that are listed in the black font and so those are the ones 129 00:11:59,360 --> 00:12:03,760 that we have been able to find on an annual basis to complete the annual 130 00:12:03,760 --> 00:12:13,420 inventory so those those will still be included in the absolutely okay thank 131 00:12:13,420 --> 00:12:15,480 you 132 00:12:15,480 --> 00:12:24,080 thanks JT because as always really good stuff strikes me sustainability is just 133 00:12:24,080 --> 00:12:30,200 understaffed for all the huge things we're taking on so I appreciate it so my 134 00:12:30,200 --> 00:12:35,720 question is how does this relate to our current efforts for a climate action 135 00:12:35,720 --> 00:12:40,200 plan on the city level and it's kind of like there's little pieces to that 136 00:12:40,200 --> 00:12:45,520 question for example I mean the big picture is this helping or distracting 137 00:12:45,520 --> 00:12:51,840 from that effort or or neither and I'm also just confused about these methods 138 00:12:51,840 --> 00:12:57,240 talk about previous method in a new method is there a third method which is 139 00:12:57,240 --> 00:13:00,960 what we're using for our climate action plan because I know it's inventory goal 140 00:13:00,960 --> 00:13:09,160 setting and then action steps right so our is this standardized method the same 141 00:13:09,160 --> 00:13:15,400 one we're using for our efforts here I guess put it as a concrete question yeah 142 00:13:15,400 --> 00:13:20,240 so let me I'll take that one step backwards so this is just for the 143 00:13:20,240 --> 00:13:26,600 inventory itself so the collection of data to generate a value for a carbon 144 00:13:26,600 --> 00:13:31,800 footprint for the community and so the methodology that sort of rolls into the 145 00:13:31,800 --> 00:13:35,600 larger climate action plan is going to be separate from this so this is really 146 00:13:35,600 --> 00:13:40,280 just that first piece that that quantitative metric of where we at with 147 00:13:40,280 --> 00:13:44,640 our current carbon emissions so the inventory that we've been using 148 00:13:44,640 --> 00:13:50,120 previously has been in line with the US the equally US community protocols and so 149 00:13:50,120 --> 00:13:54,160 those protocols say you have to have these metrics under these five basic 150 00:13:54,160 --> 00:13:59,440 categories and so those 18 metrics that we've generated they round out that that 151 00:13:59,440 --> 00:14:04,280 five basic categories so that we can produce that inventory what we're 152 00:14:04,280 --> 00:14:11,200 looking at here is closer to what organizations report to along the lines 153 00:14:11,200 --> 00:14:15,960 of the global protocols and a city like the city of Dallas has sort of that 154 00:14:15,960 --> 00:14:20,640 larger scope built in and so when you go to report to some different 155 00:14:20,640 --> 00:14:25,040 organizations CDP is one of them that you can say okay we're reporting with 156 00:14:25,040 --> 00:14:30,360 the the global protocols and sort of that larger so that we're taking a look 157 00:14:30,360 --> 00:14:38,160 at here and so this this puts Denton the region sort of those cities more along 158 00:14:38,160 --> 00:14:45,480 that path than just the US a community protocols now those protocols do the the 159 00:14:45,480 --> 00:14:49,640 a community protocols are accepted you know through our annual reporting with 160 00:14:49,640 --> 00:14:53,040 the carbon disclosure project and so we still have all of that historical data 161 00:14:53,040 --> 00:15:02,040 okay do you so I'm just asking you this regional effort which I think is great 162 00:15:02,040 --> 00:15:07,800 is it sounds like it can be synergistic and even improve what we're doing in a 163 00:15:07,800 --> 00:15:12,320 more local level that's kind of the message yes and some of the data sets 164 00:15:12,320 --> 00:15:16,920 sort of come in a little bit cleaner at the regional level transportation being 165 00:15:16,920 --> 00:15:21,040 a great example of one so when you're talking about the city boundary of 166 00:15:21,040 --> 00:15:26,480 incoming traffic outbound traffic and so when you look at the region as a whole 167 00:15:26,480 --> 00:15:28,560 you're going to get a little bit more accurate number of some of that 168 00:15:28,560 --> 00:15:34,180 transportation and so when they're able to to divvy up those vehicle miles 169 00:15:34,180 --> 00:15:38,600 traveling for example that's that's one benefit that we get a little bit cleaner 170 00:15:38,600 --> 00:15:44,160 value there we have one more question that for because we're going to have we 171 00:15:44,160 --> 00:15:50,600 are going to be proposing these goals eventually net zero by 2050 is the 172 00:15:50,600 --> 00:15:55,000 region also going to have that aspect or that is I mean collectively as a region 173 00:15:55,000 --> 00:16:01,120 or is this more just inventory so my understanding currently is that it is 174 00:16:01,120 --> 00:16:05,960 more of a fact-finding mission at this time for transportation planning and for 175 00:16:05,960 --> 00:16:09,840 air quality planning there's just such a large overlap with something like a 176 00:16:09,840 --> 00:16:14,120 greenhouse gas inventory that it's a great metric to put to you know help 177 00:16:14,120 --> 00:16:20,920 analyze both of those things I'm just a few questions comments so this relates 178 00:16:20,920 --> 00:16:26,120 back to our simply sustainable framework with chapter 2 so this is something that 179 00:16:26,120 --> 00:16:32,960 that we're working on this is our chapter so my question is how does this 180 00:16:32,960 --> 00:16:39,640 moving from annually to two to three years affect that like our goals how do 181 00:16:39,640 --> 00:16:45,360 we keep up with the things that we we we state that we want to do we want to be 182 00:16:45,360 --> 00:16:50,520 better if we're not getting that annual input every year for this committee or 183 00:16:50,520 --> 00:16:56,640 council to review yep and so it would basically be a check-in every two years 184 00:16:56,640 --> 00:17:04,320 now some of these metrics things like electricity use by the community that's 185 00:17:04,320 --> 00:17:07,920 something that we can pull sort of the average residential usage you know we've 186 00:17:07,920 --> 00:17:12,880 got that value we can do a check-in on that annual water usage by the community 187 00:17:12,880 --> 00:17:19,240 we can do a check-in on that in terms of just compiling all 33 of those metrics 188 00:17:19,240 --> 00:17:25,720 into one report that is the greenhouse gas inventory when we go into sort of 189 00:17:25,720 --> 00:17:30,760 that level of analysis that's something that on a two-year cycle is a little bit 190 00:17:30,760 --> 00:17:35,240 more manageable than on a one-year cycle okay so you kind of answered my question 191 00:17:35,240 --> 00:17:39,200 I was wondering if we could do both but I guess for the things that directly 192 00:17:39,200 --> 00:17:44,240 affect the decisions that council makes regarding utilities and things like that 193 00:17:44,240 --> 00:17:51,080 for greenhouse emissions that data you could get annually if you needed to some 194 00:17:51,080 --> 00:17:59,040 of the relevant metric level data can be pulled on an annual basis things like 195 00:17:59,040 --> 00:18:04,400 the vehicle modeling the transportation modeling is going to be a little bit 196 00:18:04,400 --> 00:18:12,760 more difficult to do on an annual basis okay so my next question is are the 197 00:18:12,760 --> 00:18:18,240 resources and data sources that you referred to from cog and regional are 198 00:18:18,240 --> 00:18:26,600 they easily accessible to to you guys to our staff for those metrics I mean is the 199 00:18:26,600 --> 00:18:31,880 communication well can you can you access that pretty easily so those are 200 00:18:31,880 --> 00:18:35,120 connections that we've been establishing through this whole process 201 00:18:35,120 --> 00:18:39,800 especially for the metrics that haven't been calculated in the past so through 202 00:18:39,800 --> 00:18:43,760 our annual dentin specific inventory we've been able to build those 203 00:18:43,760 --> 00:18:47,040 relationships establish those connections for those data sources and 204 00:18:47,040 --> 00:18:51,120 on those metrics those are a relatively quick turnaround when it becomes 205 00:18:51,120 --> 00:18:56,160 available some some things it takes a while to calculate on you know whoever 206 00:18:56,160 --> 00:19:03,240 is housing the data and so some of those new metrics have been a little bit slow 207 00:19:03,240 --> 00:19:08,160 going but once this process is complete we've got a list of where that data 208 00:19:08,160 --> 00:19:13,100 lives what is the analysis that has to take place between the raw data and the 209 00:19:13,100 --> 00:19:17,200 data that we report once all of that is figured out you know the next round 210 00:19:17,200 --> 00:19:22,680 should be more seamless one more question pertaining to this and then just 211 00:19:22,680 --> 00:19:27,640 one other question I'm curious about in regards to the benefits of going to two 212 00:19:27,640 --> 00:19:35,200 to three or are there any chances that we would lose out on grants if we didn't 213 00:19:35,200 --> 00:19:41,320 have annual data on greenhouse emissions that we apply for if we weren't to get 214 00:19:41,320 --> 00:19:48,000 updated information as frequently I will say that for organizations that require 215 00:19:48,000 --> 00:19:53,120 these have a greenhouse gas inventory most of those organizations require at 216 00:19:53,120 --> 00:19:58,160 a minimum on a bi-annual basis and so a lot of the cities that are our members 217 00:19:58,160 --> 00:20:02,400 of those are producing these every other year and so that should be sufficient 218 00:20:02,400 --> 00:20:07,840 for the grant funding okay I just want to make sure we're not losing opportunities 219 00:20:07,840 --> 00:20:13,440 so could we say two years and not three years because the option is two to three 220 00:20:13,440 --> 00:20:20,960 I mean how do we make sure that it stays right and the two to three year window 221 00:20:20,960 --> 00:20:27,900 is more so if we you know say for 2021 we've got a lot of data that has been 222 00:20:27,900 --> 00:20:33,840 produced for that year that would be a great year to do that inventory if we're 223 00:20:33,840 --> 00:20:38,080 looking at a comparison between 2021 and 2022 if we know those data sets aren't 224 00:20:38,080 --> 00:20:42,520 going to be available specifically for 2022 or if they're going to be estimates 225 00:20:42,520 --> 00:20:48,320 we want to take as much actual data as we can to get that the the best number 226 00:20:48,320 --> 00:20:53,800 that we can generate for that sorry just my last question so you mentioned water 227 00:20:53,800 --> 00:20:58,760 and wastewater and when you were talking about it I just I became curious do you 228 00:20:58,760 --> 00:21:03,440 the local entities or cities have different water requirements that say 229 00:21:03,440 --> 00:21:08,320 regional the regional requirements as far as like chemical runoff and things 230 00:21:08,320 --> 00:21:13,520 like that so how do you get regional information if each city has different 231 00:21:13,520 --> 00:21:18,280 restrictions it's complicated and this is one of the the benefits of sort of 232 00:21:18,280 --> 00:21:23,680 doing it at the regional level so the cog is able to collect that data on on a 233 00:21:23,680 --> 00:21:28,440 large scale from all of the different water and wastewater producers here 234 00:21:28,440 --> 00:21:35,040 within North Texas what they're able to do from there is divvy it up based on 235 00:21:35,040 --> 00:21:39,600 usage to each of the individual entities those 12 entities that are a part of the 236 00:21:39,600 --> 00:21:44,280 cohort and they'll be able to say from and it may be within a city that you're 237 00:21:44,280 --> 00:21:49,560 pulling from two different water plants let's say for your drinking water they're 238 00:21:49,560 --> 00:21:55,880 able to take the metrics from both of those water plants and basically ratio 239 00:21:55,880 --> 00:21:59,720 that out to each of those individual entities where that may be more 240 00:21:59,720 --> 00:22:04,200 difficult for them to do on their own okay but say for that that's something 241 00:22:04,200 --> 00:22:07,840 separate than what our water and wastewater does they they're monitoring 242 00:22:07,840 --> 00:22:12,280 our water system all the time that's definitely one of the benefits and as 243 00:22:12,280 --> 00:22:17,480 we're producing those annual inventories historically that's one of the things 244 00:22:17,480 --> 00:22:21,360 that sort of allowed us to do that as a full-service city having access to that 245 00:22:21,360 --> 00:22:29,880 data okay okay just a couple questions on these new metrics and we're just 246 00:22:29,880 --> 00:22:33,160 curious how the data is actually collected or partitioned to individual 247 00:22:33,160 --> 00:22:38,200 cities so for aviation for example obviously is a huge regional issue 248 00:22:38,200 --> 00:22:42,440 because of our large airports and then communities line either the north or 249 00:22:42,440 --> 00:22:47,040 south of DSW for example might experience a heavier deposition of 250 00:22:47,040 --> 00:22:51,480 aviation driven missions than say communities like Plano where cities to 251 00:22:51,480 --> 00:22:55,160 the west of here so is that as a regional estimate or is that also 252 00:22:55,160 --> 00:23:02,720 partitioned out to cities as ownership of that emission itself right so it will 253 00:23:02,720 --> 00:23:08,080 be partitioned out a good example to aviation's a little bit more difficult 254 00:23:08,080 --> 00:23:12,120 to kind of you know picture in your head so you can think about railways has 255 00:23:12,120 --> 00:23:16,760 another one and so they will be partitioning that out based on the 256 00:23:16,760 --> 00:23:22,640 number of miles that exist within a city or a jurisdiction and so they will be 257 00:23:22,640 --> 00:23:27,360 able to separate out that data and deliver that information to the cities 258 00:23:27,360 --> 00:23:31,600 and then on a regional level you know they'll be able to to capture all of 259 00:23:31,600 --> 00:23:36,160 that so it's yeah and then for instance we have a local airport as well it is 260 00:23:36,160 --> 00:23:40,440 it also considered locally generated emissions say like from takeoffs or 261 00:23:40,440 --> 00:23:45,080 landings yes as compared to like these larger transportation into DFW that are 262 00:23:45,080 --> 00:23:48,960 just flying overhead is there a separation there yes there is and so 263 00:23:48,960 --> 00:23:53,800 yep so they'll be looking at kind of similar to how transportation is you 264 00:23:53,800 --> 00:23:57,200 know if you're taking a trip within just that jurisdiction or you have the 265 00:23:57,200 --> 00:24:01,600 outbound in the inbound they'll be taking a look at that on all of those um and 266 00:24:01,600 --> 00:24:07,040 then I see that non-utility fuel estimates are also added in under 267 00:24:07,040 --> 00:24:10,720 residential energy is that including things like lawn equipment or what is 268 00:24:10,720 --> 00:24:17,000 factored into that new metric right so those will be things like propane usage 269 00:24:17,000 --> 00:24:22,100 and that's going to be something that is based on if not national averages state 270 00:24:22,100 --> 00:24:27,160 averages just because that's a really difficult one to measure without sort of 271 00:24:27,160 --> 00:24:31,280 getting into the consumption inventory looking at purchases and things like 272 00:24:31,280 --> 00:24:35,440 that and so that will be more of an estimate but we'll be able to to add 273 00:24:35,440 --> 00:24:39,200 that to the inventory where previously it wasn't lawn equipment specifically or 274 00:24:39,200 --> 00:24:43,600 just with like say outboard rails with propane tanks I believe that there is a 275 00:24:43,600 --> 00:24:50,280 metric for both of those so it's it's essentially taking a look at what fuels 276 00:24:50,280 --> 00:24:55,400 exist that we have data for and then supplementing that information with you 277 00:24:55,400 --> 00:25:00,400 know estimates based on population essentially and then just last one the 278 00:25:00,400 --> 00:25:06,080 fugitive emissions I know that member so has made a couple questions about our 279 00:25:06,080 --> 00:25:10,400 gas leaks emissions and whether those are reported or just estimated is that 280 00:25:10,400 --> 00:25:15,680 something too that we have the ability to produce data for is that again just a 281 00:25:15,680 --> 00:25:21,160 regional estimate so with the help of the North Central Texas Council of 282 00:25:21,160 --> 00:25:25,640 Governments we've been able to get some data in terms of the just like 283 00:25:25,640 --> 00:25:29,360 electricity has transmission and distribution losses essentially that 284 00:25:29,360 --> 00:25:34,640 information so production versus what was actually used in the in the home or 285 00:25:34,640 --> 00:25:39,920 you know at a partial facility what have you and so those values in the 286 00:25:39,920 --> 00:25:43,760 difference between those two values we have and so that's what's going to be 287 00:25:43,760 --> 00:25:48,120 going into that that fugitive emission that would that include things just like 288 00:25:48,120 --> 00:25:53,440 pipeline emissions as well as things like flaring from well heads the latter 289 00:25:53,440 --> 00:25:58,000 one I would have to double check on and we are working with IGLI on that one but 290 00:25:58,000 --> 00:26:02,200 it you can really think of it as losses from transmission and distribution 291 00:26:02,200 --> 00:26:06,160 essentially for natural gas. Thank you. 292 00:26:06,160 --> 00:26:08,160 Go ahead. 293 00:26:08,160 --> 00:26:20,160 This may be too far down the line to even consider the gathering of the data. We're going to compare it against some standards that are already established. 294 00:26:20,160 --> 00:26:26,160 Maybe I should say the headline of this question is human health, the impact on human health. 295 00:26:26,160 --> 00:26:36,160 Will that data provide information to us and even more on an annual basis if there is a major pollutant that 296 00:26:36,160 --> 00:26:46,160 leads to immediate discussion concerns. Will that be part of our plan? Is that part of your scope of work? 297 00:26:46,160 --> 00:26:52,160 To produce even information that could help us from a human health perspective. 298 00:26:52,160 --> 00:26:56,160 That's why we measure everything that we're measuring and doing the work that we're doing. 299 00:26:56,160 --> 00:27:04,160 We're concerned about the human health factor in this thing. So is that to be part of this total programming? 300 00:27:04,160 --> 00:27:12,160 This definitely gets the ball rolling for that. So just as the COG is doing this partially from an air quality perspective 301 00:27:12,160 --> 00:27:19,160 because of the amount of air pollutants that are co-emitted with greenhouse gases, they come from the same sources. 302 00:27:19,160 --> 00:27:26,160 This is a really good metric for them to get that started and also through the climate planning process. 303 00:27:26,160 --> 00:27:31,160 This is sort of that first step and as we get into the scope of that climate plan 304 00:27:31,160 --> 00:27:38,160 public health will absolutely be something that we take a look at and this will give us a good starting point for that. 305 00:27:38,160 --> 00:27:39,160 Thank you. 306 00:27:39,160 --> 00:27:46,160 I appreciate that question on public health, human health because that's the reason why we're here. 307 00:27:46,160 --> 00:27:47,160 Exactly. 308 00:27:47,160 --> 00:27:48,160 So thank you. 309 00:27:48,160 --> 00:27:49,160 You're welcome. 310 00:27:49,160 --> 00:27:51,160 Are we good? 311 00:27:51,160 --> 00:27:57,160 Alright, we look forward to bringing those results back to you this summer and that is all I have. 312 00:27:57,160 --> 00:27:59,160 Thank you, JT. I appreciate it. 313 00:27:59,160 --> 00:28:00,160 You're welcome. 314 00:28:00,160 --> 00:28:06,160 Alright, so we will move on to item C, staff reports. 315 00:28:06,160 --> 00:28:12,160 There are four. Catherine, are you going to take those or do you want to? 316 00:28:12,160 --> 00:28:19,160 I will take those and we can start if you have any questions on any of them. 317 00:28:19,160 --> 00:28:23,160 We can walk through them a little bit if you'd like to. 318 00:28:23,160 --> 00:28:32,160 I have a question about why our bird thing, why we didn't get approved for Bird City. 319 00:28:32,160 --> 00:28:34,160 If we know. 320 00:28:34,160 --> 00:28:39,160 They did not give us a report of how it was graded. 321 00:28:39,160 --> 00:28:50,160 I have to have a call with their coordinator for her to let me know which credits they did not like the information that we provided. 322 00:28:50,160 --> 00:28:53,160 So that's something that we'll be working on. 323 00:28:53,160 --> 00:28:55,160 And then following back up? 324 00:28:55,160 --> 00:28:57,160 Yes, we're applying. 325 00:28:57,160 --> 00:29:07,160 And they weren't super enthusiastic about first time applicants being awarded Bird City. 326 00:29:07,160 --> 00:29:12,160 So it's a very hard designation according to their coordinator. 327 00:29:12,160 --> 00:29:15,160 I'll be working with her next year. 328 00:29:15,160 --> 00:29:19,160 Okay. Well I have no doubt that we can achieve it. 329 00:29:19,160 --> 00:29:28,160 Did anyone else have a question about that or any other item? 330 00:29:28,160 --> 00:29:30,160 Dark skylighting maybe? 331 00:29:30,160 --> 00:29:32,160 Brian, did you see that? 332 00:29:32,160 --> 00:29:33,160 Yes, I did. 333 00:29:33,160 --> 00:29:36,160 Ed? 334 00:29:36,160 --> 00:29:43,160 I was looking at the next steps and it's very comprehensive. 335 00:29:43,160 --> 00:30:02,160 My question is, is there going to be, I mentioned this at the last meeting, is there going to be any information regarding just basics of climate change to educate people what it is and what causes it? 336 00:30:02,160 --> 00:30:04,160 On the website? 337 00:30:04,160 --> 00:30:07,160 On the website or as a presentation? 338 00:30:07,160 --> 00:30:16,160 We've done some 101 classes in the past, so that's definitely something that we can add. 339 00:30:16,160 --> 00:30:18,160 We've been doing some videos. 340 00:30:18,160 --> 00:30:22,160 So we can add some videos and let those live out there for people to go and watch. 341 00:30:22,160 --> 00:30:26,160 And some, I can say, information on the sustainability website? 342 00:30:26,160 --> 00:30:29,160 The website and Facebook and we can share them that way. 343 00:30:29,160 --> 00:30:42,160 Good. And even, I've seen some places where they actually explain carbon footprint and how people can take very simple actions to reduce theirs. 344 00:30:42,160 --> 00:30:59,160 So I think the more we can approach that from an educational standpoint, the greater the success of what's coming down the road in terms of the climate action plan. 345 00:30:59,160 --> 00:31:06,160 And even, I'm sorry, even if we don't make our own, I'm sure there's some pretty great videos out there already that maybe we can link. 346 00:31:06,160 --> 00:31:08,160 There's a lot of stuff out there. 347 00:31:08,160 --> 00:31:19,160 And Canvas has some great conversations with Denton ISD about their solar and their buses so that we can share that information. 348 00:31:19,160 --> 00:31:23,160 So we'll be highlighting that in the publications. 349 00:31:23,160 --> 00:31:35,160 And on the recycling, I know that we talked about it here in the background and that before we've had it in a presentation with DISD and their contamination. 350 00:31:35,160 --> 00:31:39,160 Is there still outreach with them about that? 351 00:31:39,160 --> 00:31:48,160 And I don't know if that's something we can discuss through this topic or not. 352 00:31:48,160 --> 00:31:55,160 Maybe we can have, we need an update specifically about that so that we can discuss it a little better. 353 00:31:55,160 --> 00:32:02,160 That's one of the things that I wanted to bring back in the next couple of months is we do that monthly with our internal team. 354 00:32:02,160 --> 00:32:05,160 So we'll bring that back and share that. 355 00:32:05,160 --> 00:32:12,160 It'll be apartment and multi or multifamily recycling and school recycling and then some of our commercial too. 356 00:32:12,160 --> 00:32:18,160 So we can let you know what we're doing on all of those fronts to address contamination. 357 00:32:18,160 --> 00:32:23,160 Okay. It's probably better on the agenda situation that we do that. 358 00:32:23,160 --> 00:32:31,160 Thanks. Anybody else have questions about Matrix, staff reports? 359 00:32:31,160 --> 00:32:45,160 I guess this is relevant. I was just curious if we will be kept abreast of process of hiring a consultant for the climate action plan. 360 00:32:45,160 --> 00:32:50,160 And what is our role in that? 361 00:32:50,160 --> 00:33:08,160 I will have to talk to purchasing about how that will work, but definitely keep you abreast of where we are in the process. We're going to go in two weeks now, two and a half weeks to solicitation review committee on that. 362 00:33:08,160 --> 00:33:10,160 Great. Thank you. 363 00:33:10,160 --> 00:33:20,160 And I have something to add to the Matrix. So I will go ahead and I don't know if I should do that now or under concluding items. 364 00:33:20,160 --> 00:33:24,160 Probably concluding and I thought I saw Adam's hand up down there too. 365 00:33:24,160 --> 00:33:26,160 All right, Adam, go ahead. 366 00:33:26,160 --> 00:33:46,160 I want to second what Ed said, I'd be nice to kind of get an update on the climate action plan because I'm just, it's probably my fault, but I'm confused on if maybe councils even weighed in on that at all yet to approve anything or we don't need their approval. So some clarification on that. 367 00:33:46,160 --> 00:33:58,160 Okay, let me, I think we'll close this item and we'll open concluding items so that you can restate that because I feel like that's probably something that a presentation that we should get. 368 00:33:58,160 --> 00:34:17,160 Okay, but before you close it, there was a couple other comments on the matrix. Quick ones. Number one, it says Briggle light covers for new development. I don't know. Did I ask for that? I'm not sure. I must have said something, but I don't know. 369 00:34:17,160 --> 00:34:30,160 You said that quite a while back, but yes. Yes. I'm not sure to me that's a priority with all the other things going, so I thought I would just say that. Okay. Yeah. 370 00:34:30,160 --> 00:34:52,160 And then on number two, Ed's point on the matrix. I think that's really important and I just wonder if as part of that, given global developments and in particular, Biden's commitment recently to increase export of liquefied natural gas. 371 00:34:52,160 --> 00:35:02,160 I'd be kind of curious if our gas will administrator or anybody knows if there's any noise being made about increased production on the Barnett shale. 372 00:35:02,160 --> 00:35:11,160 It might be nice to just see if anybody's got their ear to the ground on that. I was at a forum, council forum last night. 373 00:35:11,160 --> 00:35:25,160 People are saying it's kind of odd. We don't see more activity around here and I don't know why that is. Anyways, if somebody could include that as part of the gas will presentation. 374 00:35:25,160 --> 00:35:30,160 It would be nice to know if we should brace ourselves for increased activity. Does that make sense? 375 00:35:30,160 --> 00:35:43,160 Just sort of the status of the current situation with gas drilling. Yeah. May I make a comment on that? Is it about the matrix? What Adam just said. Okay. Yeah. 376 00:35:43,160 --> 00:35:58,160 From what I understand, what new drilling there is in the ETJ, and maybe Michael can. So we're not posted to discuss that, so what we'll do is we'll just add that to the matrix so that we can have a full discussion on that. 377 00:35:58,160 --> 00:36:12,160 Maybe you can respond to that question when we have it. Just keep it back here. Okay. Well I was suggesting it could be part of what Ed's already on the matrix. Yeah. If that's okay. Yep. 378 00:36:12,160 --> 00:36:36,160 And I asked for a presentation on the data centers that are coming, and I don't see it on the matrix. Unless it's there and I'm missing it. But I'd like for this, because of the electricity usage and everything, I would like for us to have some information on. 379 00:36:36,160 --> 00:36:53,160 Wow. Well it was in my head that I even needed to do that. But I really thought it was on here. Yes. I think it was. Maybe it just got taken off. We could just add it back. We'll do. Thank you. 380 00:36:53,160 --> 00:37:17,160 So then we'll move on to concluding items. If we have anything new that we want to add to the matrix or discuss, we can share that now. Anybody? I'd just like to say that I watched the presentation to city council about the work plan. 381 00:37:17,160 --> 00:37:29,160 I was very happy to see that the council was positively affected by that and agrees with everything. Awesome. I think that's really good. 382 00:37:29,160 --> 00:37:52,160 That's good to hear. Adam? Yeah, I was thinking, the climate action plan touches on so many things, but it might be nice to have a presentation that updates us on that process. Whenever staff feels like it's a good point to do that. And I'm particularly interested in how that plan's going to gear into all the other plans. 383 00:37:52,160 --> 00:38:06,160 I mean it was Tuesday, council just passed the mobility, I think they updated mobility plan on the 2040 plan. There was another smaller thing about, I can't remember, but a lot of plans are kind of coming through the system. 384 00:38:06,160 --> 00:38:25,160 And we got another one we think is really important. So maybe the context of that update could be a little bit of how it fits into the bigger planning picture, if possible. So something like that. 385 00:38:25,160 --> 00:38:51,160 I would like to add to Adam's comment, I think that we could stand to use an update on the climate action plan process and what our role is in that continuing on as far as city council, if they've been presented on it, if they've agreed since we're not in direct communication with them on that as individuals. 386 00:38:51,160 --> 00:39:17,160 And the last thing is an update for us, maybe just a staff report on the Avondale organic gardening, or just the organic gardening in our parks. Maybe we could have parks come and talk to us about that. I know that it's something that we've discussed and it's been on hold for a little bit. So just an update on that. 387 00:39:17,160 --> 00:39:25,160 That would be great. 388 00:39:25,160 --> 00:39:32,160 All right, well we will conclude at 1.39 for our shortest meeting on record. 389 00:39:32,160 --> 00:39:37,160 Thank you everybody. Have a good weekend.