WEBVTT

00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:07.519
First item on our agenda is we have a work session to

00:00:07.519 --> 00:00:08.679
receive report, hold a

00:00:08.679 --> 00:00:12.640
discussion, and provide direction regarding the DMV

00:00:12.640 --> 00:00:14.039
community sponsorship

00:00:14.039 --> 00:00:20.000
program and I think Brian Langley is going to lead us on

00:00:20.000 --> 00:00:20.480
that.

00:00:23.879 --> 00:00:27.179
Good morning. Brian Langley, Deputy City Manager. I want to

00:00:27.179 --> 00:00:28.399
spend a few minutes with you today

00:00:28.399 --> 00:00:31.510
talking about the community sponsorship program at DMV and

00:00:31.510 --> 00:00:32.399
try to get some

00:00:32.399 --> 00:00:37.509
direction from the PEB of how you'd like us to proceed. So

00:00:37.509 --> 00:00:39.560
just in terms of

00:00:39.560 --> 00:00:43.969
background DMV currently has approximately $100,000 budget

00:00:43.969 --> 00:00:44.320
ed for

00:00:44.320 --> 00:00:48.549
sponsorships on an annual basis in the budget. These funds

00:00:48.549 --> 00:00:49.640
are typically used

00:00:49.640 --> 00:00:52.130
for nonprofit organizations and sometimes other City

00:00:52.130 --> 00:00:53.039
Department events.

00:00:53.039 --> 00:00:56.960
The purpose really has been to provide a similar process to

00:00:56.960 --> 00:00:58.320
what is found in Iowa

00:00:58.320 --> 00:01:01.869
use, investor operated utilities or owned utilities. And so

00:01:01.869 --> 00:01:03.119
over the past few years

00:01:03.119 --> 00:01:08.079
DMV has spent between $42,000 to $64,000 annually on some

00:01:08.079 --> 00:01:08.239
of the

00:01:08.239 --> 00:01:11.670
sponsorships and in your backup I included a five-year

00:01:11.670 --> 00:01:12.599
history of those

00:01:12.599 --> 00:01:20.019
sponsorships by year. Other sponsorships for the city

00:01:20.019 --> 00:01:20.439
typically

00:01:20.439 --> 00:01:23.239
require City Council approval. So if you look at the agenda

00:01:23.239 --> 00:01:24.120
, for example for

00:01:24.120 --> 00:01:26.819
tomorrow's agenda for council, there are a couple of

00:01:26.819 --> 00:01:28.299
sponsorships for the

00:01:28.299 --> 00:01:30.650
Parks Department that's going forward to the City Council

00:01:30.650 --> 00:01:31.519
for approval and some

00:01:31.519 --> 00:01:34.299
in-kind sponsorships and some types of things that they're

00:01:34.299 --> 00:01:35.159
going to be doing

00:01:35.159 --> 00:01:38.640
for those events. These sponsorships also have an

00:01:38.640 --> 00:01:40.120
application process. There's

00:01:40.120 --> 00:01:42.750
some selection criteria and a formal agreement that's

00:01:42.750 --> 00:01:43.840
entered into the city

00:01:43.840 --> 00:01:47.799
and the other parties. DMV does not have any such formal

00:01:47.799 --> 00:01:49.159
process and only an

00:01:49.159 --> 00:01:53.180
internal approval process has been used. Very informal how

00:01:53.180 --> 00:01:55.599
it's been done. So in

00:01:55.599 --> 00:01:57.980
terms of the purpose of this meeting we're looking to get

00:01:57.980 --> 00:01:58.920
some direction from

00:01:58.920 --> 00:02:01.689
you on whether number one do you think this is a program

00:02:01.689 --> 00:02:02.519
that should be

00:02:02.519 --> 00:02:07.739
continued and if so we would like to present to you and the

00:02:07.739 --> 00:02:09.039
council proposed

00:02:09.039 --> 00:02:11.860
application and approval process for future events so that

00:02:11.860 --> 00:02:12.479
we can try to

00:02:12.479 --> 00:02:15.919
formalize this. This could be done where it was you would

00:02:15.919 --> 00:02:17.080
approve them on an

00:02:17.080 --> 00:02:20.650
individual basis or you could approve all of them at one

00:02:20.650 --> 00:02:23.139
time potentially. So

00:02:23.139 --> 00:02:26.909
with that I'll be happy to answer any questions that you

00:02:26.909 --> 00:02:27.599
may have.

00:02:36.080 --> 00:02:37.939
The rest of the money would go into the fund balance for DM

00:02:37.939 --> 00:02:40.360
V or could be used

00:02:40.360 --> 00:02:43.680
for other purposes in the budget.

00:02:46.120 --> 00:02:49.789
One of the slides earlier confused me. The DMV does not

00:02:49.789 --> 00:02:51.319
have an application

00:02:51.319 --> 00:02:55.060
process so which ones do have an application process that

00:02:55.060 --> 00:02:55.919
you referenced

00:02:55.919 --> 00:02:58.520
in one of the slides? The other departments that I've

00:02:58.520 --> 00:02:59.120
mentioned to you

00:02:59.120 --> 00:03:02.439
that we've seen they have a formal application process. The

00:03:02.439 --> 00:03:03.400
one I'm most

00:03:03.400 --> 00:03:07.819
familiar with is the hotel occupancy occupancy tax process

00:03:07.819 --> 00:03:08.560
so some of you may

00:03:08.560 --> 00:03:11.379
be familiar with that process around the city but there's a

00:03:11.379 --> 00:03:12.120
formal set of

00:03:12.120 --> 00:03:15.870
guidelines that are developed in an application process and

00:03:15.870 --> 00:03:16.520
all of the

00:03:16.520 --> 00:03:19.340
entities that want to receive those funds they submit an

00:03:19.340 --> 00:03:20.319
application it goes

00:03:20.319 --> 00:03:22.699
to a committee the committee tries to evaluate those and

00:03:22.699 --> 00:03:23.000
make a

00:03:23.000 --> 00:03:26.439
recommendation of which ones to fund and all of that comes

00:03:26.439 --> 00:03:27.639
as a slate to the City

00:03:27.639 --> 00:03:32.360
Council to approve. If we were to develop something could

00:03:32.360 --> 00:03:33.240
we have it part of the

00:03:33.240 --> 00:03:36.530
budgeting process that next year here are the sponsorships

00:03:36.530 --> 00:03:37.520
that we're going

00:03:37.520 --> 00:03:41.159
to have? I really didn't think any of these are

00:03:41.159 --> 00:03:43.560
inappropriate I mean they're

00:03:43.560 --> 00:03:47.840
giving back to the community so especially things like the

00:03:47.840 --> 00:03:48.639
tree giveaway

00:03:48.639 --> 00:03:51.319
well that helps shade your house so your house is more

00:03:51.319 --> 00:03:52.520
energy efficient you know

00:03:52.520 --> 00:03:56.919
we need to do those kinds of things so I'm in support of

00:03:56.919 --> 00:03:59.199
continuing this and if

00:03:59.199 --> 00:04:03.780
we need some guidelines that's appropriate too. Okay well

00:04:03.780 --> 00:04:04.120
we can

00:04:04.120 --> 00:04:06.389
certainly make it as part of the budget process and the hot

00:04:06.389 --> 00:04:07.159
funds process that

00:04:07.159 --> 00:04:09.360
I was mentioning to you that's exactly how that works is

00:04:09.360 --> 00:04:10.240
they come forward as

00:04:10.240 --> 00:04:12.530
part of the budget process and the council approves them as

00:04:12.530 --> 00:04:13.020
part of the

00:04:13.020 --> 00:04:15.610
annual budget so if that's something the PB would like to

00:04:15.610 --> 00:04:16.399
see we could certainly

00:04:16.399 --> 00:04:19.629
do it that way going forward. We just wanted to make sure

00:04:19.629 --> 00:04:20.399
that all of these

00:04:20.399 --> 00:04:23.399
were known they were clearly visible both the PUP the City

00:04:23.399 --> 00:04:24.120
Council and the

00:04:24.120 --> 00:04:28.639
public. We've seen this before yeah these have come to the

00:04:28.639 --> 00:04:29.800
public utility board

00:04:29.800 --> 00:04:35.009
and from what I understand that a lot of these came by our

00:04:35.009 --> 00:04:36.040
genes of various

00:04:36.040 --> 00:04:40.399
council members and perhaps the city managers and times

00:04:40.399 --> 00:04:41.439
past so it hasn't

00:04:41.439 --> 00:04:44.949
been a decision that's just been made by a little group at

00:04:44.949 --> 00:04:46.120
DME that it's come

00:04:46.120 --> 00:04:51.050
sort of from the community and I think I think as others

00:04:51.050 --> 00:04:53.319
have a process there

00:04:53.319 --> 00:04:56.620
should be a process but I'd like to see it continue if we

00:04:56.620 --> 00:04:57.800
didn't own our own

00:04:57.800 --> 00:05:01.670
utilities and we had a vendor in for the utilities that's

00:05:01.670 --> 00:05:02.600
what they do I

00:05:02.600 --> 00:05:06.879
understand CAHSER is quite heavily involved in some of the

00:05:06.879 --> 00:05:07.720
same things we

00:05:07.720 --> 00:05:11.189
are to a greater extent so I think it's a good program and

00:05:11.189 --> 00:05:12.459
I think the citizens

00:05:12.459 --> 00:05:20.139
deserve to be the benefit of these things. Yeah you know my

00:05:20.139 --> 00:05:20.879
comment would be

00:05:20.879 --> 00:05:27.769
that we need to be as you know consistent across across how

00:05:27.769 --> 00:05:28.480
we do it in

00:05:28.480 --> 00:05:33.319
the city but that you know being a municipally owned

00:05:33.319 --> 00:05:35.319
utility there is

00:05:35.319 --> 00:05:41.579
somewhat of a an obligation if you will that and I like

00:05:41.579 --> 00:05:44.079
Barbara I look down the

00:05:44.079 --> 00:05:48.389
list and there's a lot of recognizable nonprofits on here

00:05:48.389 --> 00:05:49.399
that are very

00:05:49.399 --> 00:05:54.480
deserving and I don't know that we want to get into every

00:05:54.480 --> 00:05:56.360
application but in the

00:05:56.360 --> 00:06:00.550
budget process it would be nice to have okay let's set out

00:06:00.550 --> 00:06:01.920
a criteria maybe

00:06:01.920 --> 00:06:05.350
philosophically here's what we're going to support these

00:06:05.350 --> 00:06:07.240
type of nonprofits it's

00:06:07.240 --> 00:06:10.470
you know it's got to be a community-wide benefit or

00:06:10.470 --> 00:06:12.079
something that benefits a

00:06:12.079 --> 00:06:16.029
community and let's use that as you know kind of the

00:06:16.029 --> 00:06:17.839
guidelines going forward so

00:06:17.839 --> 00:06:22.800
if y'all can come back with a recommendation on how that

00:06:22.800 --> 00:06:23.399
process is

00:06:23.399 --> 00:06:30.529
going to look through the budget process and you know if

00:06:30.529 --> 00:06:32.319
you're gonna

00:06:32.319 --> 00:06:36.860
including because once you do this it's going to open it up

00:06:36.860 --> 00:06:38.439
there's going to be

00:06:38.439 --> 00:06:41.839
a lot of people want to apply for a grant or a nonprofit

00:06:41.839 --> 00:06:42.800
believe me I

00:06:42.800 --> 00:06:48.019
probably get three or four solicitations a week from from

00:06:48.019 --> 00:06:49.680
good causes that some

00:06:49.680 --> 00:06:53.310
that you just have to okay here's what the dollars are let

00:06:53.310 --> 00:06:54.560
's let's allocate

00:06:54.560 --> 00:06:59.110
that and let's let's go let's plan it going forward because

00:06:59.110 --> 00:07:01.160
a lot of the a lot

00:07:01.160 --> 00:07:05.490
of these nonprofits are going to want to plan much farther

00:07:05.490 --> 00:07:07.680
ahead than just week

00:07:07.680 --> 00:07:10.759
to week or month to month they want to know they want to be

00:07:10.759 --> 00:07:12.399
able to budget you

00:07:12.399 --> 00:07:17.120
know what's coming so any other comments on that now I'm in

00:07:17.120 --> 00:07:18.040
a total agreement I

00:07:18.040 --> 00:07:21.899
want to keep this program as much as possible and you know

00:07:21.899 --> 00:07:23.319
try to be as

00:07:23.319 --> 00:07:26.269
generous as possible to to a lot of these organizations I

00:07:26.269 --> 00:07:27.160
saw there were a

00:07:27.160 --> 00:07:33.129
couple that were not included in this year's budget I guess

00:07:33.129 --> 00:07:34.240
and I had some

00:07:34.240 --> 00:07:36.920
questions about that in particular like the Denton Public

00:07:36.920 --> 00:07:39.199
Library and there were

00:07:39.199 --> 00:07:41.769
a couple of others that I was kind of questioning why we

00:07:41.769 --> 00:07:42.839
weren't doing those

00:07:42.839 --> 00:07:45.189
this year since we had in years past because I felt like

00:07:45.189 --> 00:07:46.000
they were really

00:07:46.000 --> 00:07:50.420
good organizations to promote and to keep on board so but

00:07:50.420 --> 00:07:51.800
having a criteria

00:07:51.800 --> 00:07:55.769
across the board so that no one ever accuses us of you know

00:07:55.769 --> 00:07:57.199
playing favorites

00:07:57.199 --> 00:07:59.949
or you know favoritism or anything like that I definitely

00:07:59.949 --> 00:08:00.800
want to see that

00:08:00.800 --> 00:08:05.759
happen okay one of the things that I particularly like is

00:08:05.759 --> 00:08:06.579
the things that

00:08:06.579 --> 00:08:10.550
they have like the lineman rodeo and some things that the

00:08:10.550 --> 00:08:11.839
staff the people

00:08:11.839 --> 00:08:15.300
that do the work for us every day I think that's good for

00:08:15.300 --> 00:08:17.160
morale to have have

00:08:17.160 --> 00:08:20.560
that and I'd like to see that stay and the lineman's rodeo

00:08:20.560 --> 00:08:21.519
that helps our

00:08:21.519 --> 00:08:25.800
lineman be better and work safer in an outage so it it's an

00:08:25.800 --> 00:08:27.360
important thing for

00:08:27.360 --> 00:08:32.299
us to be supporting them in absolutely well if I if I've

00:08:32.299 --> 00:08:33.159
got your direction

00:08:33.159 --> 00:08:35.450
down then I'll bring back some some guidelines and

00:08:35.450 --> 00:08:36.679
application process for

00:08:36.679 --> 00:08:39.169
you I did want to mention that on tomorrow's council agenda

00:08:39.169 --> 00:08:39.679
we have the

00:08:39.679 --> 00:08:42.259
same work session to try to get their feedback and we'll

00:08:42.259 --> 00:08:43.340
bring something back

00:08:43.340 --> 00:08:47.350
based on your feedback in there to you okay okay thank you

00:08:47.350 --> 00:08:47.879
so much for your

00:08:47.879 --> 00:08:56.710
time thanks okay continuing now with the regular meeting we

00:08:56.710 --> 00:08:57.559
have the consent

00:08:57.559 --> 00:09:04.289
agenda we have two items on consent a and B years any any

00:09:04.289 --> 00:09:05.559
member who would

00:09:05.559 --> 00:09:09.750
like to have either of those pull for individual

00:09:09.750 --> 00:09:14.679
consideration be Brendan

00:09:14.679 --> 00:09:26.860
request item BB pool be be pulled okay any others no okay

00:09:26.860 --> 00:09:27.639
then is there a

00:09:27.639 --> 00:09:36.440
motion then to approve item a on the consent agenda motion

00:09:36.440 --> 00:09:37.600
second Barbara and

00:09:37.600 --> 00:09:46.019
a second Susan any discussion all in favor say aye any

00:09:46.019 --> 00:09:48.679
opposed same sign okay

00:09:48.679 --> 00:09:53.120
item number B Brendan I just kind of wanted a general

00:09:53.120 --> 00:09:55.500
overview of what the

00:09:55.500 --> 00:09:58.919
plan was what the project was I read through some of the

00:09:58.919 --> 00:09:59.799
detailed information

00:09:59.799 --> 00:10:04.370
that was provided but I just thought maybe general

00:10:04.370 --> 00:10:11.279
explanation of it I do

00:10:11.279 --> 00:10:14.570
have a very brief presentation if if you want me to go

00:10:14.570 --> 00:10:16.399
through that otherwise I

00:10:16.399 --> 00:10:25.220
I can just answer questions on that so the item that's

00:10:25.220 --> 00:10:27.919
before you is an

00:10:27.919 --> 00:10:31.669
interconnection agreement and with target this is actually

00:10:31.669 --> 00:10:32.399
the retail

00:10:32.399 --> 00:10:36.929
facility not the storage facility so this is on the retail

00:10:36.929 --> 00:10:37.840
facility on the

00:10:37.840 --> 00:10:41.720
loop so I can quickly go over this distributed generation

00:10:41.720 --> 00:10:42.399
interconnection

00:10:42.399 --> 00:10:45.529
process and the agreement with target our recommendation

00:10:45.529 --> 00:10:46.639
and sort of the steps

00:10:46.639 --> 00:10:48.950
and then if you have any questions that I don't answer in

00:10:48.950 --> 00:10:50.879
this please just shout

00:10:50.879 --> 00:10:56.879
them out in the process and typically when we have and

00:10:56.879 --> 00:10:57.960
distributed generation

00:10:57.960 --> 00:11:00.629
interconnections come to us they're small systems these are

00:11:00.629 --> 00:11:01.639
the solar systems

00:11:01.639 --> 00:11:04.480
that people are installing on their homes they're usually

00:11:04.480 --> 00:11:05.320
ranging in size

00:11:05.320 --> 00:11:11.200
from about four or five KW to maybe ten target system is to

00:11:11.200 --> 00:11:11.840
put that in

00:11:11.840 --> 00:11:16.769
perspective is 660 KW so it's a very large installation and

00:11:16.769 --> 00:11:17.159
we wanted to

00:11:17.159 --> 00:11:20.320
bring that forward to the pub one to make you aware of that

00:11:20.320 --> 00:11:21.279
- this is going to

00:11:21.279 --> 00:11:24.740
be part of our ongoing effort to make sure you guys are

00:11:24.740 --> 00:11:25.759
aware of these

00:11:25.759 --> 00:11:29.330
installations that are going on and make sure that you're

00:11:29.330 --> 00:11:30.480
on the process that

00:11:30.480 --> 00:11:32.889
we're going to be used so for this one in particular we

00:11:32.889 --> 00:11:33.840
wanted to make sure

00:11:33.840 --> 00:11:36.250
that you guys were aware these these agreements are

00:11:36.250 --> 00:11:37.759
typically executed by DME

00:11:37.759 --> 00:11:40.889
staff we're going to change the process a little bit and

00:11:40.889 --> 00:11:42.159
this this one was the

00:11:42.159 --> 00:11:44.360
first one up we thought this was a good one to bring

00:11:44.360 --> 00:11:46.440
forward to you and so when

00:11:46.440 --> 00:11:49.000
someone applies for interconnection it's simply a process

00:11:49.000 --> 00:11:49.720
by which they go

00:11:49.720 --> 00:11:52.240
through our engineering department they go through building

00:11:52.240 --> 00:11:53.399
inspections and we

00:11:53.399 --> 00:11:57.549
make sure that their systems are safe to interconnect with

00:11:57.549 --> 00:11:59.759
our grid and for this

00:11:59.759 --> 00:12:03.679
particular system we were required by the PUC to do an

00:12:03.679 --> 00:12:04.679
inter pre interconnection

00:12:04.679 --> 00:12:08.210
study and that's been finalized and basically what that

00:12:08.210 --> 00:12:09.399
said was it's safe

00:12:09.399 --> 00:12:12.899
their system design is safe and can interconnect and Brent

00:12:12.899 --> 00:12:13.720
maybe I don't

00:12:13.720 --> 00:12:16.059
know if you might be able to add anything on that I can't

00:12:16.059 --> 00:12:16.679
speak to the

00:12:16.679 --> 00:12:20.139
engineering side I apologize but and we did get the results

00:12:20.139 --> 00:12:21.440
from that study and

00:12:21.440 --> 00:12:23.950
it came back and they're good to go so they're going to be

00:12:23.950 --> 00:12:24.879
applying for their

00:12:24.879 --> 00:12:27.799
building permit probably this week if they haven't already

00:12:27.799 --> 00:12:29.639
and so the target

00:12:29.639 --> 00:12:32.570
system it will be the largest PV system within our service

00:12:32.570 --> 00:12:34.240
territory like I said

00:12:34.240 --> 00:12:40.720
it's 660 KW rooftop solar panels going in and for them the

00:12:40.720 --> 00:12:41.519
permitting process

00:12:41.519 --> 00:12:44.769
can't begin without the executed agreement and that's they

00:12:44.769 --> 00:12:45.559
actually can

00:12:45.559 --> 00:12:48.580
begin they won't be approved in the process until they have

00:12:48.580 --> 00:12:49.320
the executed

00:12:49.320 --> 00:12:54.029
interconnection agreement and so we recommend approval of

00:12:54.029 --> 00:12:54.519
this this

00:12:54.519 --> 00:12:58.809
agreement I'll add doesn't obligate the city to purchase

00:12:58.809 --> 00:13:00.559
any energy produced by

00:13:00.559 --> 00:13:03.129
the system will actually be coming back to you with a

00:13:03.129 --> 00:13:04.399
separate agreement and for

00:13:04.399 --> 00:13:08.840
that in the future so you have any questions beyond that

00:13:08.840 --> 00:13:13.759
sure I just wanted

00:13:13.759 --> 00:13:18.210
to know is this a trend that we're seeing this is our

00:13:18.210 --> 00:13:20.159
second large

00:13:20.159 --> 00:13:26.120
commercial installation so I would be hesitant to call it a

00:13:26.120 --> 00:13:27.480
trend right in

00:13:27.480 --> 00:13:30.320
general and the price of solar panels has come down

00:13:30.320 --> 00:13:32.100
drastically so the value

00:13:32.100 --> 00:13:35.120
that it's creating for customers is growing and so I

00:13:35.120 --> 00:13:36.519
definitely think that

00:13:36.519 --> 00:13:39.080
will continue to see commercial installations of larger

00:13:39.080 --> 00:13:39.840
scale maybe not

00:13:39.840 --> 00:13:42.519
this size although it wouldn't surprise me if we saw

00:13:42.519 --> 00:13:44.159
another retail facility

00:13:44.159 --> 00:13:47.960
that was a similar scale to a target a big-box store moving

00:13:47.960 --> 00:13:48.559
forward with this

00:13:48.559 --> 00:13:54.519
type of installation in the future you mentioned that we'll

00:13:54.519 --> 00:13:55.639
get another

00:13:55.639 --> 00:14:00.769
presentation regarding any purchase purchases of their

00:14:00.769 --> 00:14:01.879
power yes so

00:14:01.879 --> 00:14:05.389
typically on the smaller systems we have a rate that

00:14:05.389 --> 00:14:07.039
applies for the credits that

00:14:07.039 --> 00:14:11.129
are generated if this system pushes back any energy DME

00:14:11.129 --> 00:14:13.159
buys it and the

00:14:13.159 --> 00:14:16.139
particular terms of the interconnection agreement require

00:14:16.139 --> 00:14:17.240
any system that's over

00:14:17.240 --> 00:14:20.809
50 KW to have a separate agreement the reason being is that

00:14:20.809 --> 00:14:21.480
it works a little

00:14:21.480 --> 00:14:25.799
bit different the rate can it can really be impacted by

00:14:25.799 --> 00:14:27.120
someone intentionally

00:14:27.120 --> 00:14:29.629
over sizing their system to generate a lot so we have to

00:14:29.629 --> 00:14:30.639
take a closer look at

00:14:30.639 --> 00:14:33.889
that but we're gonna come back with that just out of

00:14:33.889 --> 00:14:36.279
curiosity do we allow them

00:14:36.279 --> 00:14:39.879
to negotiate that right or do we just say right and this is

00:14:39.879 --> 00:14:40.960
how we talk with

00:14:40.960 --> 00:14:44.179
them about that and so for but for residential customers it

00:14:44.179 --> 00:14:45.240
's just no it's

00:14:45.240 --> 00:14:47.889
that in there in the rate book yes sir but there is a

00:14:47.889 --> 00:14:49.000
reimbursement or a

00:14:49.000 --> 00:14:52.789
purchase we purchase some power from residents yes as well

00:14:52.789 --> 00:14:54.000
yes okay thank you

00:14:54.000 --> 00:14:58.519
I guess it's probably hard to make an estimate of what how

00:14:58.519 --> 00:14:59.879
much of the power

00:14:59.879 --> 00:15:05.840
out of this that we would actually be able to purchase

00:15:05.840 --> 00:15:07.799
until you really get

00:15:07.799 --> 00:15:13.679
into you know what what their usage is and all that but as

00:15:13.679 --> 00:15:16.200
a comparison 60

00:15:16.200 --> 00:15:19.809
kilowatts I mean for instance what's the methane that we

00:15:19.809 --> 00:15:21.240
get off of methane out

00:15:21.240 --> 00:15:30.610
of the landfill that generates is that about 60 okay how

00:15:30.610 --> 00:15:31.559
does that transfer to

00:15:31.559 --> 00:15:41.080
60 okay okay so 1500 even though it's large it's relatively

00:15:41.080 --> 00:15:43.120
I guess small

00:15:43.120 --> 00:15:48.049
because in the grand scheme of things but you know I'm like

00:15:48.049 --> 00:15:49.759
Lily I like the I

00:15:49.759 --> 00:15:53.710
like the trend and it's and I don't know that you could you

00:15:53.710 --> 00:15:55.000
could get enough

00:15:55.000 --> 00:16:00.960
rooftops in the city you know maybe we could use this as a

00:16:00.960 --> 00:16:02.440
model or whatever

00:16:02.440 --> 00:16:07.759
but if we're looking for solar power to purchase you know

00:16:07.759 --> 00:16:09.519
if we I just want to

00:16:09.519 --> 00:16:14.200
make sure that we're through our Emo I know we're buying

00:16:14.200 --> 00:16:15.879
bigger contracts of

00:16:15.879 --> 00:16:19.169
solar but at the same time if we can have some piece of

00:16:19.169 --> 00:16:20.759
that solar power that

00:16:20.759 --> 00:16:24.940
we're doing that are rooftops of some of the large

00:16:24.940 --> 00:16:27.399
buildings around town I think

00:16:27.399 --> 00:16:31.860
that'd be a great thing to pursue you know like I say it

00:16:31.860 --> 00:16:34.080
may not be it may not

00:16:34.080 --> 00:16:36.649
be in the grand scheme of things a large piece of it but at

00:16:36.649 --> 00:16:37.840
least it's some piece

00:16:37.840 --> 00:16:41.570
of it and it's it's something that benefits our our

00:16:41.570 --> 00:16:44.000
customers as well as it

00:16:44.000 --> 00:16:48.590
it adds more into our renewable portfolio that's that's

00:16:48.590 --> 00:16:50.320
kind of generated

00:16:50.320 --> 00:16:55.250
here at home so I like I like I like this type of deal we

00:16:55.250 --> 00:16:57.120
should use this to

00:16:57.120 --> 00:17:02.350
go out and you know maybe we should encourage more we agree

00:17:02.350 --> 00:17:02.480
we're very proud

00:17:02.480 --> 00:17:06.420
to have this system installed I think I'm noticing a lot

00:17:06.420 --> 00:17:07.880
more rooftops with

00:17:07.880 --> 00:17:11.250
solar panels on them now as I drive around seems like just

00:17:11.250 --> 00:17:11.880
the last few

00:17:11.880 --> 00:17:15.839
weeks there's been yes ma'am we've had a significant

00:17:15.839 --> 00:17:16.759
increase in the number of

00:17:16.759 --> 00:17:19.000
applications we've received in the last few years and we're

00:17:19.000 --> 00:17:19.799
very excited about

00:17:19.799 --> 00:17:23.220
that it'd be interesting to see the statistics of how it's

00:17:23.220 --> 00:17:24.720
increasing sure I

00:17:24.720 --> 00:17:30.180
don't is it in maybe nope not in this one but I can

00:17:30.180 --> 00:17:31.319
certainly bring that bring

00:17:31.319 --> 00:17:33.839
that back and we have that in another presentation I'll

00:17:33.839 --> 00:17:35.319
believe later today at

00:17:35.319 --> 00:17:38.359
committee on the environment so can help me to share that

00:17:38.359 --> 00:17:40.200
with you guys and with

00:17:40.200 --> 00:17:45.400
Tesla announcing their new solar roof I think we're gonna

00:17:45.400 --> 00:17:46.920
see a lot more of that

00:17:46.920 --> 00:17:50.789
yes we've had we've seen interest in that particular

00:17:50.789 --> 00:17:54.720
product already okay any

00:17:54.720 --> 00:17:58.640
other I was just gonna move for approval okay so we have a

00:17:58.640 --> 00:18:00.160
motion to approve and

00:18:00.160 --> 00:18:06.259
a second to recommend adopting an ordinance to execute the

00:18:06.259 --> 00:18:08.319
interconnection

00:18:08.319 --> 00:18:12.660
and parallel operation distributed generation with target

00:18:12.660 --> 00:18:13.680
and keep in mind

00:18:13.680 --> 00:18:18.660
this is only for that does not include any any purchase but

00:18:18.660 --> 00:18:20.319
just the ability to

00:18:20.319 --> 00:18:25.720
connect and to install it so motion is second any

00:18:25.720 --> 00:18:27.440
discussion the other

00:18:27.440 --> 00:18:33.400
discussion hearing none all in favor say aye any opposed

00:18:33.400 --> 00:18:36.160
same sign okay thank you

00:18:36.160 --> 00:18:44.119
very good okay items for individual consideration we have

00:18:44.119 --> 00:18:45.839
the public utility

00:18:45.839 --> 00:18:52.220
board minutes of July 24th 2017 these have been distributed

00:18:52.220 --> 00:18:54.000
in advance any

00:18:54.000 --> 00:19:05.119
corrections comments to these no hearing none then these

00:19:05.119 --> 00:19:08.039
will stand approved as

00:19:08.039 --> 00:19:14.160
submitted item number B is to receive report hold a

00:19:14.160 --> 00:19:15.119
discussion and provide

00:19:15.119 --> 00:19:23.079
recommendation regarding compressed natural gas fueling

00:19:23.079 --> 00:19:25.559
facility good

00:19:25.559 --> 00:19:31.109
morning I wanted to bring an update to the board we have

00:19:31.109 --> 00:19:32.480
been discussing the

00:19:32.480 --> 00:19:36.799
issue of the compressed natural gas fueling facility and

00:19:36.799 --> 00:19:38.200
the Associated

00:19:38.200 --> 00:19:43.140
Fleet out at a solid waste that has come before you on the

00:19:43.140 --> 00:19:45.440
24th of July we took

00:19:45.440 --> 00:19:50.259
the same presentation to the council on July 25th and had a

00:19:50.259 --> 00:19:51.519
fairly lengthy

00:19:51.519 --> 00:19:54.880
discussion on the various options that were available

00:19:54.880 --> 00:19:56.680
council recommended that

00:19:56.680 --> 00:20:01.609
we pursue the compressed natural gas station for city of

00:20:01.609 --> 00:20:03.000
didn't use only

00:20:03.000 --> 00:20:06.769
option which was option three on the performance that we

00:20:06.769 --> 00:20:08.200
shared with you last

00:20:08.200 --> 00:20:11.769
time but they did request staff to first search for

00:20:11.769 --> 00:20:14.440
existing CNG stations if

00:20:14.440 --> 00:20:18.730
those happen to be around here in the city of Denton and so

00:20:18.730 --> 00:20:20.440
the closest

00:20:20.440 --> 00:20:25.980
existing station that we can find is in grapevine Irving

00:20:25.980 --> 00:20:27.480
area it's about a 40

00:20:27.480 --> 00:20:31.890
mile round trip we did through our research find that there

00:20:31.890 --> 00:20:33.279
was a possibility

00:20:33.279 --> 00:20:36.680
of a Denton compressed natural gas station that would offer

00:20:36.680 --> 00:20:37.519
retail sales

00:20:37.519 --> 00:20:42.839
off of I 35 this is just in the formative stages right now

00:20:42.839 --> 00:20:43.980
but we

00:20:43.980 --> 00:20:47.460
thought that there was enough interest in that from our

00:20:47.460 --> 00:20:48.680
perspective to at

00:20:48.680 --> 00:20:52.160
least run some numbers on and see what that might look like

00:20:52.160 --> 00:20:53.400
for our particular

00:20:53.400 --> 00:20:58.950
fleet keeping in mind that we've got 24 vehicles and those

00:20:58.950 --> 00:21:00.519
vehicles are not

00:21:00.519 --> 00:21:04.750
known for their exceptional mileage and as a result running

00:21:04.750 --> 00:21:06.079
the numbers on those

00:21:06.079 --> 00:21:12.180
on a 20 mile round trip per vehicle on a daily basis

00:21:12.180 --> 00:21:14.880
putting in the staff time

00:21:14.880 --> 00:21:18.519
associated with that the depreciation of the vehicles

00:21:18.519 --> 00:21:19.880
themselves from the extra

00:21:19.880 --> 00:21:23.589
mileage ultimately ends up in about a 3.2 million dollar

00:21:23.589 --> 00:21:25.400
price tag before we

00:21:25.400 --> 00:21:31.279
are able to age the CNG fleet out so that we felt that that

00:21:31.279 --> 00:21:32.079
option is

00:21:32.079 --> 00:21:35.920
obviously more expensive than the option that we have on

00:21:35.920 --> 00:21:37.880
looking at the ability

00:21:37.880 --> 00:21:40.619
to construct a compressed natural gas station for didn't

00:21:40.619 --> 00:21:41.599
use at the existing

00:21:41.599 --> 00:21:45.660
renewable fuels island it also has some additional

00:21:45.660 --> 00:21:47.920
uncertainties associated with

00:21:47.920 --> 00:21:51.720
it and some risk one we don't know what this process

00:21:51.720 --> 00:21:53.039
project is even going to

00:21:53.039 --> 00:21:56.190
occur we do not know at this point what that fuel island

00:21:56.190 --> 00:21:58.160
would look like how

00:21:58.160 --> 00:22:02.440
many available fill-up opportunities there are on a per

00:22:02.440 --> 00:22:04.440
vehicle basis we

00:22:04.440 --> 00:22:07.640
would be in competition for it with anyone else that would

00:22:07.640 --> 00:22:08.559
actually be out

00:22:08.559 --> 00:22:14.519
there doing the fueling as well we did a staff time on that

00:22:14.519 --> 00:22:16.720
of a about 30-minute

00:22:16.720 --> 00:22:21.329
transit I think that's highly optimistic especially going

00:22:21.329 --> 00:22:22.640
down I 35

00:22:22.640 --> 00:22:26.730
with that number of vehicles and and with the uncertainties

00:22:26.730 --> 00:22:27.759
associated with

00:22:27.759 --> 00:22:32.690
the number of pumps that would be available so we chose to

00:22:32.690 --> 00:22:33.960
not modify our

00:22:33.960 --> 00:22:37.799
recommendation based on this just due to those uncertain

00:22:37.799 --> 00:22:39.359
ties and also due to the

00:22:39.359 --> 00:22:44.119
overall cost so we had talked with y'all last time and kind

00:22:44.119 --> 00:22:45.160
of circle around this

00:22:45.160 --> 00:22:51.140
idea of the retail sales versus city of Denton use only we

00:22:51.140 --> 00:22:53.440
had talked about the

00:22:53.440 --> 00:22:57.039
last time about the complications associated with retail

00:22:57.039 --> 00:22:57.960
sales and I guess

00:22:57.960 --> 00:23:02.089
the only thing I'd like to add on top of that is that we at

00:23:02.089 --> 00:23:03.480
this point at least

00:23:03.480 --> 00:23:07.440
have some indication that we might have a retail competitor

00:23:07.440 --> 00:23:08.680
that would be much

00:23:08.680 --> 00:23:11.970
more favorably located and would be able to sell the fuel

00:23:11.970 --> 00:23:13.240
at a lower price than

00:23:13.240 --> 00:23:17.029
us that that to me means even less support from my

00:23:17.029 --> 00:23:18.960
perspective on the idea

00:23:18.960 --> 00:23:23.690
of having public retail sales for this fuel island so we

00:23:23.690 --> 00:23:25.240
are at this point

00:23:25.240 --> 00:23:28.900
recommending going forward with the city of Denton use only

00:23:28.900 --> 00:23:30.000
at the renewable

00:23:30.000 --> 00:23:32.900
fuels island we've talked in some detail last time about

00:23:32.900 --> 00:23:34.000
what this looks like

00:23:34.000 --> 00:23:39.089
from a monetary standpoint and basically we're looking at

00:23:39.089 --> 00:23:40.680
about a one point one

00:23:40.680 --> 00:23:45.279
three million dollar total investment that would allow us

00:23:45.279 --> 00:23:46.640
to basically age the

00:23:46.640 --> 00:23:50.279
fleet out and would also provide us some flexibility to

00:23:50.279 --> 00:23:51.440
keep the options

00:23:51.440 --> 00:23:55.720
available if C&G turns around or we make some other

00:23:55.720 --> 00:23:58.400
decisions but right now that

00:23:58.400 --> 00:24:04.279
is what staff is is recommending and I'd be happy to take

00:24:04.279 --> 00:24:05.880
any additional

00:24:05.880 --> 00:24:09.160
questions that you might have we'd like to get a formal

00:24:09.160 --> 00:24:10.799
recommendation from the

00:24:10.799 --> 00:24:15.160
board and if you're in support of this and then take that

00:24:15.160 --> 00:24:15.839
back to the City

00:24:15.839 --> 00:24:19.869
Council at the next opportunity so I'd be happy to answer

00:24:19.869 --> 00:24:21.880
any questions I'm

00:24:21.880 --> 00:24:27.200
sorry Brendan so the the fuel where so the fueling station

00:24:27.200 --> 00:24:28.039
would be where the

00:24:28.039 --> 00:24:31.079
landfill entrance is that's correct one is already that's

00:24:31.079 --> 00:24:32.799
correct and so is this

00:24:32.799 --> 00:24:35.930
I'm sorry I just have kind of a limited understanding of

00:24:35.930 --> 00:24:37.119
this is this is this

00:24:37.119 --> 00:24:41.019
fuel piped to a source or does somebody bring it and fill

00:24:41.019 --> 00:24:42.559
up a tank that resides

00:24:42.559 --> 00:24:46.750
right now we have a mobile fueling option but then the

00:24:46.750 --> 00:24:47.799
future in the future

00:24:47.799 --> 00:24:52.400
what we will have is a there is a connection point that we

00:24:52.400 --> 00:24:53.559
can actually

00:24:53.559 --> 00:24:59.869
access at 1001 Mayhill which is just down the road in fact

00:24:59.869 --> 00:25:00.720
if you drive down

00:25:00.720 --> 00:25:04.259
Mayhill you'll see two buildings sitting there and there's

00:25:04.259 --> 00:25:05.680
some yellow bollards

00:25:05.680 --> 00:25:10.730
that exist around a gas distribution point what we would do

00:25:10.730 --> 00:25:11.720
is we would

00:25:11.720 --> 00:25:14.980
basically locate the meter there and then there would be a

00:25:14.980 --> 00:25:16.039
line extended to

00:25:16.039 --> 00:25:19.569
the fueling station where there would be a all of the

00:25:19.569 --> 00:25:21.519
apparatus necessary to fuel

00:25:21.519 --> 00:25:24.980
the trucks so it would be coming out of a line and not

00:25:24.980 --> 00:25:26.200
being delivered at that

00:25:26.200 --> 00:25:31.819
whose line is that it is an atmosphere line okay right so

00:25:31.819 --> 00:25:33.640
we discussed last

00:25:33.640 --> 00:25:38.970
time the environmental differences between compressed

00:25:38.970 --> 00:25:40.279
natural gas right and

00:25:40.279 --> 00:25:47.700
diesel and it seemed like you know diesel the diesel was

00:25:47.700 --> 00:25:49.880
favored towards low

00:25:49.880 --> 00:25:55.759
ozone causing emissions is that correct the the the b20

00:25:55.759 --> 00:25:57.640
blend that we use will

00:25:57.640 --> 00:26:01.809
produce slightly more nitrogen oxides than the compressed

00:26:01.809 --> 00:26:03.200
natural gas will so

00:26:03.200 --> 00:26:09.160
from an ozone standpoint it is just slightly worse from a

00:26:09.160 --> 00:26:10.480
green greenhouse

00:26:10.480 --> 00:26:15.410
gas standpoint though it is much better okay so that's that

00:26:15.410 --> 00:26:16.599
's the the difference

00:26:16.599 --> 00:26:21.799
between the two so the compressed natural gas then is more

00:26:21.799 --> 00:26:22.680
harmful from the

00:26:22.680 --> 00:26:25.319
perspective of greenhouse gases is that what you're saying

00:26:25.319 --> 00:26:26.680
that that's correct so is

00:26:26.680 --> 00:26:31.490
there anything that we can do that can make sure that we

00:26:31.490 --> 00:26:32.880
don't you know that

00:26:32.880 --> 00:26:36.089
our trucks are burning it properly that we're handling it

00:26:36.089 --> 00:26:37.359
properly at the point

00:26:37.359 --> 00:26:39.819
and is there anything we can do to put pressure on the

00:26:39.819 --> 00:26:40.799
atmosphere to make sure

00:26:40.799 --> 00:26:44.279
that they're handling it properly I don't know if we can

00:26:44.279 --> 00:26:45.460
put pressure on

00:26:45.460 --> 00:26:51.119
atmosphere I think that there is certainly a an improvement

00:26:51.119 --> 00:26:52.079
in having a

00:26:52.079 --> 00:26:56.470
fixed fueling versus a mobile option just from the

00:26:56.470 --> 00:26:58.559
standpoint of connections

00:26:58.559 --> 00:27:03.220
and disconnects and the way the fuels handled etc so there

00:27:03.220 --> 00:27:05.359
's a I would I would

00:27:05.359 --> 00:27:08.920
say from the standpoint of where we are today with the

00:27:08.920 --> 00:27:10.720
mobile fueling platform

00:27:10.720 --> 00:27:14.880
versus the the platform that we're putting in place we'll

00:27:14.880 --> 00:27:16.000
have less leak

00:27:16.000 --> 00:27:19.380
loss we'll have a better opportunity to top off the the

00:27:19.380 --> 00:27:20.759
truck so we can get the

00:27:20.759 --> 00:27:23.740
best mileage out of them possible so there's some there's

00:27:23.740 --> 00:27:24.640
some ancillary

00:27:24.640 --> 00:27:28.759
benefits from a operational standpoint as well as things

00:27:28.759 --> 00:27:30.200
like leak loss that

00:27:30.200 --> 00:27:34.339
will be improved by having a fixed station so and in

00:27:34.339 --> 00:27:36.000
emission control

00:27:36.000 --> 00:27:40.279
technologies are constantly evolving as well and so that I

00:27:40.279 --> 00:27:41.559
expect that as we

00:27:41.559 --> 00:27:44.920
move into the future there's possibilities to see that on

00:27:44.920 --> 00:27:45.440
both the

00:27:45.440 --> 00:27:51.680
biodiesel and CNG platforms sure and so how much longer

00:27:51.680 --> 00:27:52.920
will it take before our

00:27:52.920 --> 00:27:59.200
CNG trucks are you know phased out the the trucks

00:27:59.200 --> 00:28:00.920
themselves keeping in mind

00:28:00.920 --> 00:28:04.839
that the majority of them have been fairly recent purchases

00:28:04.839 --> 00:28:05.599
we're probably

00:28:05.599 --> 00:28:11.480
looking at a five to seven year age out on those and so it

00:28:11.480 --> 00:28:13.319
will if you look at

00:28:13.319 --> 00:28:17.460
the at the pro forma that we put together for them for the

00:28:17.460 --> 00:28:18.599
retail option

00:28:18.599 --> 00:28:21.609
that we just discussed where we're seeing a pretty

00:28:21.609 --> 00:28:22.960
substantial drop off

00:28:22.960 --> 00:28:25.279
about year five and then we've got a couple of vehicles

00:28:25.279 --> 00:28:26.119
that we feel would

00:28:26.119 --> 00:28:29.279
probably last another two years so we think by the time we

00:28:29.279 --> 00:28:30.240
get to about year

00:28:30.240 --> 00:28:34.990
seven from now we'll be through that that fleet and age

00:28:34.990 --> 00:28:36.359
them out. Okay and how

00:28:36.359 --> 00:28:42.599
long will the CNG set up last I mean what's the lifetime on

00:28:42.599 --> 00:28:42.839
that?

00:28:42.839 --> 00:28:47.769
I would think that from I don't know an exact answer on

00:28:47.769 --> 00:28:49.119
that but you're

00:28:49.119 --> 00:28:53.470
looking at decades at least for the line and then the

00:28:53.470 --> 00:28:56.000
actual equipment itself I

00:28:56.000 --> 00:29:00.420
don't know Nick if you've got a sense of that but I would I

00:29:00.420 --> 00:29:01.920
would expect just on

00:29:01.920 --> 00:29:06.119
a retail pump basis it lasts at least 10 to 15 years so

00:29:06.119 --> 00:29:07.559
yeah I'm getting a nod so

00:29:07.559 --> 00:29:12.259
that yeah. And then one final question is is there any way

00:29:12.259 --> 00:29:13.640
that that once we

00:29:13.640 --> 00:29:18.039
finished out with a CNG that it can be converted into a

00:29:18.039 --> 00:29:20.519
different type of line?

00:29:20.519 --> 00:29:26.400
I would think probably not just simply because of the

00:29:26.400 --> 00:29:26.880
construction

00:29:26.880 --> 00:29:29.980
for it but keep in mind that that's a full-service fueling

00:29:29.980 --> 00:29:31.039
facility already

00:29:31.039 --> 00:29:35.210
and so we have options of E85 gasoline and biodiesel there

00:29:35.210 --> 00:29:37.119
already on site so

00:29:37.119 --> 00:29:41.529
the fueling station itself would certainly still be usable

00:29:41.529 --> 00:29:42.319
and it would

00:29:42.319 --> 00:29:46.890
really depend if we have any additional equipment or make

00:29:46.890 --> 00:29:48.480
some other decision in

00:29:48.480 --> 00:29:52.329
the future as to whether we would use that compressed

00:29:52.329 --> 00:29:54.079
natural gas component.

00:29:55.319 --> 00:29:59.140
I've got a question about can you go back to the pro-former

00:29:59.140 --> 00:30:05.480
chart yeah yes okay

00:30:05.480 --> 00:30:11.829
so so really the difference in the public sales is a $600,

00:30:11.829 --> 00:30:13.279
000 grant from

00:30:13.279 --> 00:30:17.809
TCEQ yes you're basically looking at the differential

00:30:17.809 --> 00:30:20.079
between the money that we

00:30:20.079 --> 00:30:23.880
would have to pay back which is $201,000 and the additional

00:30:23.880 --> 00:30:24.599
money that remains

00:30:24.599 --> 00:30:28.299
which is $398,000 there's a slight differential in the

00:30:28.299 --> 00:30:29.839
franchise fee not

00:30:29.839 --> 00:30:36.200
much. But I don't see any operation as any O&M expense

00:30:36.200 --> 00:30:37.319
associated with the

00:30:37.319 --> 00:30:42.089
public sales there would be some of that absolutely yes

00:30:42.089 --> 00:30:43.519
absolutely so that

00:30:43.519 --> 00:30:46.680
difference could be that kind of looks like the only

00:30:46.680 --> 00:30:48.680
difference is we've got to

00:30:48.680 --> 00:30:51.680
send a check back to TCEQ and that's the only difference it

00:30:51.680 --> 00:30:52.599
's really more than

00:30:52.599 --> 00:30:58.009
that because there's going to be some O&M cost to that as

00:30:58.009 --> 00:30:59.960
well. That's correct we

00:30:59.960 --> 00:31:03.079
we it's a little bit difficult having not been in the

00:31:03.079 --> 00:31:04.640
retail fuel business to

00:31:04.640 --> 00:31:08.690
put a put a number to that. We certainly anticipate that

00:31:08.690 --> 00:31:09.799
there'll be some

00:31:09.799 --> 00:31:12.799
administrative components associated with the cash handling

00:31:12.799 --> 00:31:13.519
side of it even

00:31:13.519 --> 00:31:18.789
though these are card reading pumps but the the other thing

00:31:18.789 --> 00:31:20.039
that we're a little

00:31:20.039 --> 00:31:23.009
bit concerned with as well is just the security of the

00:31:23.009 --> 00:31:25.119
facility. We feel at

00:31:25.119 --> 00:31:29.069
minimum we're going to need cameras we're going to perhaps

00:31:29.069 --> 00:31:31.200
have the the need to

00:31:31.200 --> 00:31:35.309
restrict access at certain times and so we we don't have a

00:31:35.309 --> 00:31:36.839
sense of what those

00:31:36.839 --> 00:31:40.269
expenses might look like but I would completely agree with

00:31:40.269 --> 00:31:41.519
you that gap is is

00:31:41.519 --> 00:31:45.089
probably much smaller in reality once you take those into

00:31:45.089 --> 00:31:47.319
consideration. You

00:31:47.319 --> 00:31:53.559
know it seems like if we're if we pull the trigger on the

00:31:53.559 --> 00:31:54.480
construction of the

00:31:54.480 --> 00:32:00.809
fueling the CNG fueling station that we're committed to

00:32:00.809 --> 00:32:02.920
using compressed

00:32:02.920 --> 00:32:06.759
natural gas in our fleet won't we since it's a 20-year

00:32:06.759 --> 00:32:09.720
asset and we're I mean

00:32:09.720 --> 00:32:13.369
it's I would not say it's going to be stranded cost if we

00:32:13.369 --> 00:32:14.279
don't. It will be it

00:32:14.279 --> 00:32:18.380
will be a stranded cost that is correct. If we choose to

00:32:18.380 --> 00:32:21.440
not have the additional

00:32:21.440 --> 00:32:25.920
fleet added then certainly that will be a stranded cost. I

00:32:25.920 --> 00:32:27.319
would totally agree

00:32:27.319 --> 00:32:30.079
it's a stranded cost I think the way I would probably

00:32:30.079 --> 00:32:30.880
encourage you to look at

00:32:30.880 --> 00:32:34.779
this though is there's probably about a two-year ROI. We're

00:32:34.779 --> 00:32:35.799
bleeding you know

00:32:35.799 --> 00:32:39.940
forty to sixty thousand dollars a month on this decision so

00:32:39.940 --> 00:32:40.759
if we've got five to

00:32:40.759 --> 00:32:43.170
seven years left of the fleet you've probably recouped this

00:32:43.170 --> 00:32:44.319
investment in a

00:32:44.319 --> 00:32:47.640
couple of years. Based upon our what we're paying now.

00:32:47.640 --> 00:32:48.559
Based upon what we're losing

00:32:48.559 --> 00:32:54.009
right now. Correct. And who knows what will happen in seven

00:32:54.009 --> 00:32:54.960
years maybe it'll be a

00:32:54.960 --> 00:33:03.789
great idea again. You don't know. Possibility. Okay any

00:33:03.789 --> 00:33:06.440
other questions? No.

00:33:06.440 --> 00:33:11.880
I had one thing Mr. Carroll last time asked about what the

00:33:11.880 --> 00:33:13.559
mobile options look

00:33:13.559 --> 00:33:17.839
like and so this is what the the actual truck is for doing

00:33:17.839 --> 00:33:19.039
the the mobile

00:33:19.039 --> 00:33:24.910
option. So the front part is a about 700 gallons worth of

00:33:24.910 --> 00:33:26.559
tanks. The back part

00:33:26.559 --> 00:33:31.490
with the C&G on it is a actually a mobile compressing unit

00:33:31.490 --> 00:33:32.119
that allows the

00:33:32.119 --> 00:33:36.539
filling of multiple trucks on a on a rapid basis. So this

00:33:36.539 --> 00:33:38.079
is this is an example

00:33:38.079 --> 00:33:42.259
of what's coming out to our side. These things are are very

00:33:42.259 --> 00:33:43.680
expensive and they

00:33:43.680 --> 00:33:47.910
also have limited fill capability due to the connections

00:33:47.910 --> 00:33:49.440
that that they require

00:33:49.440 --> 00:33:52.750
and so we we chose not to pursue this just from a monetary

00:33:52.750 --> 00:33:53.839
and operational

00:33:53.839 --> 00:33:59.799
standpoint. One more question. Sure. I'm sorry on the we

00:33:59.799 --> 00:34:02.319
comparing the cost of

00:34:02.319 --> 00:34:09.719
the actual trucks with compressed natural gas versus diesel

00:34:09.719 --> 00:34:10.480
is there a

00:34:10.480 --> 00:34:17.050
difference between the cost of the of the vehicles to use

00:34:17.050 --> 00:34:19.039
biodiesel versus

00:34:19.039 --> 00:34:23.070
what I'd call regular diesel because that's what we're

00:34:23.070 --> 00:34:24.480
picking up the the

00:34:24.480 --> 00:34:28.800
biodiesel is we're picking up the

00:34:29.599 --> 00:34:37.039
not the greenhouse gas but the nitrogen oxide savings I

00:34:37.039 --> 00:34:37.519
guess if you

00:34:37.519 --> 00:34:41.010
will reduction in that so is there a difference in the cost

00:34:41.010 --> 00:34:41.679
there? I don't

00:34:41.679 --> 00:34:44.719
I don't believe those platforms are different and I'm

00:34:44.719 --> 00:34:46.000
getting another nod

00:34:46.000 --> 00:34:52.610
suggesting that was a good guess. Okay. So okay any other

00:34:52.610 --> 00:34:56.559
questions? None. Is there

00:34:56.559 --> 00:35:02.099
a motion then to make a recommendation regarding the CNG

00:35:02.099 --> 00:35:04.320
fueling facility?

00:35:04.559 --> 00:35:09.599
I'll move approval. A motion from Susan and a second from

00:35:09.599 --> 00:35:11.440
Barbara. Any other

00:35:11.440 --> 00:35:17.400
discussion? It's kind of odd that we've ended up in a

00:35:17.400 --> 00:35:20.400
situation like this and so it's I'm

00:35:20.400 --> 00:35:23.440
reluctant to vote for it as reluctant as we were to even

00:35:23.440 --> 00:35:24.840
motion for approval on

00:35:24.840 --> 00:35:27.860
it but it seems like it's the best step forward and in the

00:35:27.860 --> 00:35:28.960
tight spot that we're

00:35:28.960 --> 00:35:34.920
in. I think the the reality is we have the best way to

00:35:34.920 --> 00:35:36.440
recover what our

00:35:36.440 --> 00:35:43.469
stranded cost is going to be at this point. I agree with

00:35:43.469 --> 00:35:46.679
Brandon. Okay I'll

00:35:46.679 --> 00:35:51.610
call the vote. All in favor say aye. Aye. Any opposed same

00:35:51.610 --> 00:35:53.639
sign. Thank you. Thanks

00:35:53.639 --> 00:36:06.760
Kenny. Thank you. Okay item C is ACM update. Mr. Chairman I

00:36:06.760 --> 00:36:08.159
believe there is a

00:36:08.159 --> 00:36:13.579
slight modification on the water or water fee ordinances. I

00:36:13.579 --> 00:36:14.559
don't know if it

00:36:14.559 --> 00:36:19.400
was Chuck or Kenny that's going to be presenting that.

00:36:23.679 --> 00:36:28.159
These two items are adjusted by either a consumer price

00:36:28.159 --> 00:36:32.039
index or as a percentage

00:36:32.039 --> 00:36:38.719
of the Dallas water rate and so they are basically a at the

00:36:38.719 --> 00:36:40.360
time that the

00:36:40.360 --> 00:36:43.320
information was presented to the board we did not have that

00:36:43.320 --> 00:36:44.599
information in hand.

00:36:44.599 --> 00:36:48.099
This is typically brought to you all around this time of

00:36:48.099 --> 00:36:49.400
the year to just let

00:36:49.400 --> 00:36:52.480
you know what we had put in the actual rate books and so

00:36:52.480 --> 00:36:53.679
the rate books that

00:36:53.679 --> 00:36:58.409
have gone forward to counsel for their evaluation have

00:36:58.409 --> 00:37:00.239
these corrected numbers

00:37:00.239 --> 00:37:08.039
in them. So this is a set 85% of Dallas. That's correct yes

00:37:08.039 --> 00:37:09.000
and the other

00:37:09.000 --> 00:37:12.280
rate is just simply a consumer price index adjustment.

00:37:12.280 --> 00:37:16.079
Right okay thank you.

00:37:16.079 --> 00:37:20.679
And the next item is a excuse me is regarding Senate bill

00:37:20.679 --> 00:37:23.239
1004. This is a new

00:37:23.239 --> 00:37:27.539
law that the governor Abbott recently signed back in early

00:37:27.539 --> 00:37:28.360
June that that

00:37:28.360 --> 00:37:32.829
will be that affects all cities within the state of Texas

00:37:32.829 --> 00:37:34.239
and what it is is is

00:37:34.239 --> 00:37:37.690
basically allowing allowing the cellular industry to

00:37:37.690 --> 00:37:40.239
install radio antennas on

00:37:40.239 --> 00:37:45.519
city right-of-way whether it be utility poles, traffic

00:37:45.519 --> 00:37:46.880
signal poles, or

00:37:46.880 --> 00:37:53.000
erect their own poles as needed within the community. The

00:37:53.000 --> 00:37:54.679
issue is that the

00:37:54.679 --> 00:37:57.429
cellular industry is indicating that they need additional

00:37:57.429 --> 00:37:58.199
coverage due to

00:37:58.199 --> 00:38:02.699
public demand of their services, wireless services, and

00:38:02.699 --> 00:38:05.599
they see this as as an

00:38:05.599 --> 00:38:10.530
easier and and also cheaper opportunity in which to do so.

00:38:10.530 --> 00:38:11.679
So they were able to

00:38:11.679 --> 00:38:15.530
get some legislation passed in the most recent legislative

00:38:15.530 --> 00:38:16.719
session and it goes

00:38:16.719 --> 00:38:19.199
into effect September 1st. All cities around the state of

00:38:19.199 --> 00:38:20.079
Texas are doing this

00:38:20.079 --> 00:38:23.519
very same thing. So this information is just being

00:38:23.519 --> 00:38:25.239
presented to you today. It's

00:38:25.239 --> 00:38:28.360
been presented to the was was presented to the Planning and

00:38:28.360 --> 00:38:28.960
Zoning Commission

00:38:28.960 --> 00:38:32.500
last week. It'll be also presented to the Historical Land

00:38:32.500 --> 00:38:33.360
mark Commission this

00:38:33.360 --> 00:38:36.989
this evening as well with ultimately being presented to the

00:38:36.989 --> 00:38:38.079
City Council for

00:38:38.079 --> 00:38:42.250
ordinance adoption on the 22nd of August. So we're ramping

00:38:42.250 --> 00:38:44.440
up internally as far as

00:38:44.440 --> 00:38:48.670
our staff working with our engineering folks, the folks at

00:38:48.670 --> 00:38:50.360
DME, the folks in our

00:38:50.360 --> 00:38:53.159
Public Works Department from an inspections perspective,

00:38:53.159 --> 00:38:53.760
and so we

00:38:53.760 --> 00:38:58.690
anticipate about 125 of these devices to be installed over

00:38:58.690 --> 00:38:59.440
the next six months

00:38:59.440 --> 00:39:04.719
with potentially another 35 or so over the next three years

00:39:04.719 --> 00:39:06.679
within Denton. Wow.

00:39:06.679 --> 00:39:10.250
So in your packet there's a memorandum along with the

00:39:10.250 --> 00:39:11.639
presentation to kind of

00:39:11.639 --> 00:39:16.380
give you an idea of what those what those those devices

00:39:16.380 --> 00:39:19.199
look like. There is

00:39:19.199 --> 00:39:26.090
one of the issues that we have had is the fact that the the

00:39:26.090 --> 00:39:27.199
industry this other

00:39:27.199 --> 00:39:30.630
industry is wanting to put these devices within the city's

00:39:30.630 --> 00:39:32.840
right-of-way at a very

00:39:32.840 --> 00:39:38.800
inexpensive cost to them and so that is a little bit of a

00:39:38.800 --> 00:39:40.199
level of consternation

00:39:40.199 --> 00:39:43.599
amongst the cities. The the city of McAllen down in South

00:39:43.599 --> 00:39:45.119
Texas is

00:39:45.119 --> 00:39:49.260
potentially wanting to sue the state of Texas to to stop

00:39:49.260 --> 00:39:50.280
this piece of

00:39:50.280 --> 00:39:53.460
legislation or at least to slow it down to assist us or

00:39:53.460 --> 00:39:55.400
assist cities and trying

00:39:55.400 --> 00:39:58.300
to seek additional compensation. Some cities for the

00:39:58.300 --> 00:39:59.559
example city of Dallas,

00:39:59.559 --> 00:40:02.039
city Arlington, and other cities around the state were

00:40:02.039 --> 00:40:04.239
averaging around $2,500

00:40:04.239 --> 00:40:11.920
per node or per cellular device and so they're at $250 per

00:40:11.920 --> 00:40:13.000
cellular device. So

00:40:13.000 --> 00:40:16.889
very different scale in far as compensation for the use of

00:40:16.889 --> 00:40:17.400
the city's

00:40:17.400 --> 00:40:21.630
right-of-way. So that isn't a lawsuit that we're looking at

00:40:21.630 --> 00:40:23.000
or at least from

00:40:23.000 --> 00:40:26.019
the standpoint of just visiting with the folks in McAllen

00:40:26.019 --> 00:40:27.079
and our city attorney's

00:40:27.079 --> 00:40:31.380
offices involved with that. So it's still in the works but

00:40:31.380 --> 00:40:32.920
we are marching ahead

00:40:32.920 --> 00:40:36.190
with implementing this this law for September 1st. We have

00:40:36.190 --> 00:40:36.800
to be ready

00:40:36.800 --> 00:40:43.309
because the industries are coming. Verizon, T-Mobile, AT&T,

00:40:43.309 --> 00:40:44.800
they have been

00:40:44.800 --> 00:40:47.449
talking to staff for the last number of weeks about this

00:40:47.449 --> 00:40:48.500
legislation so we're

00:40:48.500 --> 00:40:53.659
geared up for it and we'll be ready to go. Yes, Barbara.

00:40:53.659 --> 00:40:55.039
Are they going to be paying a fee

00:40:55.039 --> 00:40:59.320
per installation for using the right-of-way? Yes ma'am. The

00:40:59.320 --> 00:41:00.360
way the legislation

00:41:00.360 --> 00:41:05.000
is written is the company when they make an application

00:41:05.000 --> 00:41:07.719
they can they can they

00:41:07.719 --> 00:41:12.150
can bundle these devices up to five per application so they

00:41:12.150 --> 00:41:13.400
'll be charged a

00:41:13.400 --> 00:41:18.079
maximum of $500 per bundle and then each device above that

00:41:18.079 --> 00:41:20.719
is $250. So but what

00:41:20.719 --> 00:41:23.519
they're doing for example one company is looking at

00:41:23.519 --> 00:41:25.920
potentially doing 55 units so

00:41:25.920 --> 00:41:30.469
what they'll be doing is just submitting 11 sets of five at

00:41:30.469 --> 00:41:32.760
$500 a piece. Is this

00:41:32.760 --> 00:41:36.429
just a one-time fee or is this per month? No ma'am or yes

00:41:36.429 --> 00:41:37.679
it's a one-time fee

00:41:37.679 --> 00:41:40.530
initially for the permit and then there'll be a small

00:41:40.530 --> 00:41:41.840
rental charge that

00:41:41.840 --> 00:41:44.349
they can that the cities can charge but it's all

00:41:44.349 --> 00:41:46.239
legislative and it's all it's

00:41:46.239 --> 00:41:49.869
prescribed the maximum amount the city can charge. The

00:41:49.869 --> 00:41:50.719
other thing with the

00:41:50.719 --> 00:41:54.090
with the legislation it sets up time clocks so once the

00:41:54.090 --> 00:41:55.679
application is made

00:41:55.679 --> 00:41:59.079
by the industry then the city has to deem whether or not it

00:41:59.079 --> 00:41:59.960
's appropriately

00:41:59.960 --> 00:42:03.449
completed as far as the application process and once that

00:42:03.449 --> 00:42:04.440
happens then a

00:42:04.440 --> 00:42:08.550
series of it then it's dictated by the amount of time the

00:42:08.550 --> 00:42:10.440
city can can issue the

00:42:10.440 --> 00:42:14.900
permit. So it's very prescribed in the way it's done so it

00:42:14.900 --> 00:42:15.920
's heavily favored in

00:42:15.920 --> 00:42:22.269
the in the telecom industry. Is there is there a policy I

00:42:22.269 --> 00:42:24.159
've I've been in another

00:42:24.159 --> 00:42:28.440
city recently and I've seen on their water towers there are

00:42:28.440 --> 00:42:29.800
numerous devices

00:42:29.800 --> 00:42:34.730
like this is there is that a city policy we don't have any

00:42:34.730 --> 00:42:35.760
on ours how does that

00:42:35.760 --> 00:42:39.329
happen? Typically in the cities that I've worked in there

00:42:39.329 --> 00:42:40.559
are policies and those

00:42:40.559 --> 00:42:44.170
are leases that are that are negotiated on an individual

00:42:44.170 --> 00:42:45.300
basis not knowing what

00:42:45.300 --> 00:42:48.110
Denton has done in the past I can't speak to that but I

00:42:48.110 --> 00:42:49.019
know in the previous

00:42:49.019 --> 00:42:52.800
cities that I've worked for it's been on a case-by-case

00:42:52.800 --> 00:42:54.039
basis and so a lot of

00:42:54.039 --> 00:42:57.260
times some cities don't want any of those devices on those

00:42:57.260 --> 00:42:58.320
water towers just

00:42:58.320 --> 00:43:01.280
for the structural integrity of them some cities see that

00:43:01.280 --> 00:43:01.960
as a revenue

00:43:01.960 --> 00:43:09.480
opportunity. I think Tim has a comment. We've had these

00:43:09.480 --> 00:43:12.639
requests before and we have basically turned them down some

00:43:12.639 --> 00:43:13.019
of it's a

00:43:13.019 --> 00:43:16.110
security issue because you've got to start opening your

00:43:16.110 --> 00:43:17.019
facility up for

00:43:17.019 --> 00:43:20.000
mobile access so sometimes when you're doing a security

00:43:20.000 --> 00:43:21.280
audit there's a little

00:43:21.280 --> 00:43:24.719
concern of you know how many people can access these sites.

00:43:24.719 --> 00:43:26.320
Right now the only

00:43:26.320 --> 00:43:30.409
thing that we have on our towers is dedicated microwave or

00:43:30.409 --> 00:43:31.960
licensed radio for

00:43:31.960 --> 00:43:35.050
our own SCADA system so they're dedicated so I think if you

00:43:35.050 --> 00:43:35.599
drive around

00:43:35.599 --> 00:43:39.559
the Metroplex you'll see some communities with probably an

00:43:39.559 --> 00:43:40.239
excessive

00:43:40.239 --> 00:43:44.920
proliferation I'll pick on a tower I drove by on Roanoke

00:43:44.920 --> 00:43:46.480
where it looks more

00:43:46.480 --> 00:43:52.349
like a communication tower than an elevator. But right now

00:43:52.349 --> 00:43:52.960
we don't have

00:43:52.960 --> 00:43:59.519
right now we have none on any of our towers. Okay thank you

00:43:59.519 --> 00:44:01.880
. Yes. How does the

00:44:01.880 --> 00:44:06.610
the app was in an application fee and then a monthly fee I

00:44:06.610 --> 00:44:07.719
guess how does that

00:44:07.719 --> 00:44:11.559
compare to other things that are co-located on on telephone

00:44:11.559 --> 00:44:12.400
poles right

00:44:12.400 --> 00:44:17.170
now? Like pole attachment? Yes. Yeah. As far as how it's

00:44:17.170 --> 00:44:18.960
done today. No just the price

00:44:18.960 --> 00:44:22.610
comparison. Fees like our fee schedule yeah current fee

00:44:22.610 --> 00:44:24.400
schedule. I'd have to

00:44:24.400 --> 00:44:27.599
find that out but but as far as but the fee schedule that

00:44:27.599 --> 00:44:28.920
they're prescribed

00:44:28.920 --> 00:44:33.869
here in in in the law it's pretty low. Right. But I'll have

00:44:33.869 --> 00:44:34.719
to find it. I don't

00:44:34.719 --> 00:44:37.269
know. We can put something together that answers that what

00:44:37.269 --> 00:44:38.360
our other various fees

00:44:38.360 --> 00:44:42.440
are for the pole attachments and give you some context.

00:44:42.440 --> 00:44:47.989
And then in neighborhoods where we're trying to push we're

00:44:47.989 --> 00:44:50.239
spending money to

00:44:50.239 --> 00:44:53.210
put electrical lines underground are they going to be

00:44:53.210 --> 00:44:54.440
allowed to come in and

00:44:54.440 --> 00:44:58.840
put a pole in and put their device on if we're trying to

00:44:58.840 --> 00:45:00.360
make it a wireless

00:45:00.360 --> 00:45:03.449
neighborhood so to speak? Actually no there is some

00:45:03.449 --> 00:45:04.599
provisions when the law

00:45:04.599 --> 00:45:08.159
that that does not allow them to install new poles within

00:45:08.159 --> 00:45:09.079
their residential

00:45:09.079 --> 00:45:12.289
subdivision or even in some of the parks they can attach it

00:45:12.289 --> 00:45:13.320
to existing poles

00:45:13.320 --> 00:45:17.360
that are within residential areas but not add new ones just

00:45:17.360 --> 00:45:18.239
to avoid the

00:45:18.239 --> 00:45:20.809
visual clutter or some of the very things you described. So

00:45:20.809 --> 00:45:22.079
there are some

00:45:22.079 --> 00:45:25.340
things that that that gives cities a little bit of leverage

00:45:25.340 --> 00:45:26.199
as far as where

00:45:26.199 --> 00:45:30.630
they can and can't go but but it's again heavily favored in

00:45:30.630 --> 00:45:31.639
the in the industry's

00:45:31.639 --> 00:45:36.110
favor. Well that's a good point because if we if we have a

00:45:36.110 --> 00:45:37.360
for instance we're

00:45:37.360 --> 00:45:40.710
looking to take utilities underground where there is

00:45:40.710 --> 00:45:43.079
existing poles and there's

00:45:43.079 --> 00:45:46.849
something attached to it then who does that just go away or

00:45:46.849 --> 00:45:47.400
do we have to

00:45:47.400 --> 00:45:50.340
accommodate that and that's and that may be something we'll

00:45:50.340 --> 00:45:51.480
have to cross that

00:45:51.480 --> 00:45:55.579
bridge when we get to it because I don't I don't know not

00:45:55.579 --> 00:45:56.599
having read the

00:45:56.599 --> 00:45:59.909
legislation and it may change out of the lawsuit there may

00:45:59.909 --> 00:46:01.119
be some compromises or

00:46:01.119 --> 00:46:06.230
whatever as that comes along. And to that point if we know

00:46:06.230 --> 00:46:07.039
we might be going

00:46:07.039 --> 00:46:10.260
underground in an area can we under the law say no you're

00:46:10.260 --> 00:46:11.440
not gonna attach to

00:46:11.440 --> 00:46:17.139
that pole at this point or? At this point I think it's I

00:46:17.139 --> 00:46:18.320
think the law is silent on

00:46:18.320 --> 00:46:22.309
that but we can we can check that and make that and let you

00:46:22.309 --> 00:46:23.440
know but again

00:46:23.440 --> 00:46:27.789
it's yeah there are a lot of things with with there's more

00:46:27.789 --> 00:46:29.159
a lot more questions

00:46:29.159 --> 00:46:32.840
that are being asked from city to city because this is a

00:46:32.840 --> 00:46:33.840
very new thing and

00:46:33.840 --> 00:46:37.690
just how prescribed it is by the state so before cities had

00:46:37.690 --> 00:46:38.880
a lot more leverage

00:46:38.880 --> 00:46:42.030
as far as you could come into our communities based on

00:46:42.030 --> 00:46:43.199
certain fees that

00:46:43.199 --> 00:46:47.719
you would pay but this is a one-size-fits-all for the city

00:46:47.719 --> 00:46:48.920
of Texas.

00:46:48.920 --> 00:46:55.280
And so we should see our cell phone bills come down right?

00:46:55.280 --> 00:46:55.320
Yeah right.

00:46:59.599 --> 00:47:04.199
Okay any other we look forward to future updates on this

00:47:04.199 --> 00:47:06.960
and where it's going but

00:47:06.960 --> 00:47:14.059
nobody likes being restricted and being told what you got

00:47:14.059 --> 00:47:16.099
to do. Hopefully there

00:47:16.099 --> 00:47:22.059
will be some local control still maintained in this. Any

00:47:22.059 --> 00:47:24.239
other comments on

00:47:24.239 --> 00:47:32.710
the new business action items? Can we get a review or

00:47:32.710 --> 00:47:36.599
report of our existing rooftop

00:47:36.599 --> 00:47:41.699
solar installation? Not necessarily the commercial part

00:47:41.699 --> 00:47:43.559
although if there are

00:47:43.559 --> 00:47:45.829
more than this one target one it'd be nice to know about

00:47:45.829 --> 00:47:46.280
them and

00:47:46.280 --> 00:47:50.349
specifically I'd like to know what rate we're buying that

00:47:50.349 --> 00:47:52.440
power back at. Have we

00:47:52.440 --> 00:47:55.690
actually bought any power back and have we spent any money

00:47:55.690 --> 00:47:56.800
buying power back

00:47:56.800 --> 00:48:01.360
from those rooftops? I would also like us to review the

00:48:01.360 --> 00:48:03.559
ordinance that we seems

00:48:03.559 --> 00:48:08.590
like we recently passed or proposed an ordinance that would

00:48:08.590 --> 00:48:10.119
change the rebate

00:48:10.119 --> 00:48:16.079
structure and also it included something about battery

00:48:16.079 --> 00:48:17.679
systems as well. I just

00:48:17.679 --> 00:48:22.019
wanted to know see if we could review that since the light

00:48:22.019 --> 00:48:23.159
has changed a

00:48:23.159 --> 00:48:28.619
little bit. Yeah I think this and it may be it may have

00:48:28.619 --> 00:48:31.079
been last year we was the

00:48:31.079 --> 00:48:35.150
first time we had in our rate ordinance that the rebate

00:48:35.150 --> 00:48:37.239
there was two two rebate

00:48:37.239 --> 00:48:40.630
levels one was without battery storage and one was with

00:48:40.630 --> 00:48:42.599
battery storage and I

00:48:42.599 --> 00:48:45.880
think that's the way we still have it today but yeah that'd

00:48:45.880 --> 00:48:47.119
be great.

00:48:47.119 --> 00:48:52.480
And see if we may have limited what we could be doing in

00:48:52.480 --> 00:48:54.440
that area for no

00:48:54.440 --> 00:49:02.920
apparent reason. Okay okay anything else we want to sell in

00:49:02.920 --> 00:49:03.400
the new business

00:49:03.400 --> 00:49:13.400
matrix? Okay all right completing items any future agenda

00:49:13.400 --> 00:49:15.679
items that any any

00:49:15.679 --> 00:49:19.739
board member would like to see? We've kind of gone through

00:49:19.739 --> 00:49:20.719
the new business

00:49:20.719 --> 00:49:29.550
stuff so all this any any general comments? No? Well and I

00:49:29.550 --> 00:49:31.159
promised her I

00:49:31.159 --> 00:49:36.110
wouldn't do it but I just can't help I want to this is the

00:49:36.110 --> 00:49:37.400
time of the meeting

00:49:37.400 --> 00:49:42.000
that we can do things like this. I'm just want to thank

00:49:42.000 --> 00:49:43.679
Barbara for your service

00:49:43.679 --> 00:49:48.929
over the years and I don't know what you're gonna do every

00:49:48.929 --> 00:49:49.760
other Monday now

00:49:49.760 --> 00:49:53.099
you're gonna have a lot of you know half a day I'm sure you

00:49:53.099 --> 00:49:54.159
'll find something to

00:49:54.159 --> 00:50:00.119
fill that time but thank you very much appreciate it. At

00:50:00.119 --> 00:50:01.000
the same time I want to

00:50:01.000 --> 00:50:04.840
recognize I noticed we have our newest member Deborah Arm

00:50:04.840 --> 00:50:06.599
antars here she has

00:50:06.599 --> 00:50:09.599
not been sworn in yet I guess that happened I'm sure that

00:50:09.599 --> 00:50:10.079
'll happen within

00:50:10.079 --> 00:50:14.639
the next two weeks so next meeting we'll see you up here

00:50:14.639 --> 00:50:16.920
and look forward to it.

00:50:16.920 --> 00:50:24.500
So with that is there a motion to adjourn? So moved. Second

00:50:24.500 --> 00:50:27.519
. All in favor say aye. Aye. Any

00:50:27.519 --> 00:50:31.360
opposed? Same sign. Thank you.
