WEBVTT 00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:04.450 Commission meeting for March 21st 2018. This meeting has 00:00:04.450 --> 00:00:05.980 been duly posted and we 00:00:05.980 --> 00:00:10.480 do have a quorum present and I will call us to order at 532 00:00:10.480 --> 00:00:13.140 . Our first order of 00:00:13.140 --> 00:00:17.559 business will be to receive clarification of agenda items. 00:00:17.559 --> 00:00:18.719 So I'll 00:00:18.719 --> 00:00:24.559 start with does anybody have any corrections on the minutes 00:00:24.559 --> 00:00:27.660 ? Mr. Sanchez? 00:00:27.660 --> 00:00:38.780 Yeah. Okay. I'll move us to our consent agenda. Any 00:00:38.780 --> 00:00:42.280 questions on the consent agenda? 00:00:42.280 --> 00:00:45.020 Commissioner Beck. Thank you Chair. I do have just one 00:00:45.020 --> 00:00:48.299 quick question. It's the 00:00:48.299 --> 00:00:53.259 same... Which item? I'm sorry. PP 17.02A the fireside 00:00:53.259 --> 00:00:54.799 addition and that... Okay. 00:00:54.799 --> 00:00:58.770 Okay. That's... We dealt with that a couple years ago. So 00:00:58.770 --> 00:00:59.880 evidently the 00:00:59.880 --> 00:01:04.939 preliminary plat expired. I was just curious, is this the 00:01:04.939 --> 00:01:07.819 same applicant or is this a 00:01:07.819 --> 00:01:15.579 different applicant? They decided not to proceed with the 00:01:15.579 --> 00:01:16.700 previous prelim and 00:01:16.700 --> 00:01:19.930 final because they wanted to redesign the subdivision 00:01:19.930 --> 00:01:21.719 layout. Okay. So that's 00:01:21.719 --> 00:01:24.170 what this is coming to be. That's all I have. I just 00:01:24.170 --> 00:01:25.760 thought maybe they got to have it all 00:01:25.760 --> 00:01:28.760 together and somebody knew it was coming. Okay. Thank you. 00:01:28.760 --> 00:01:32.120 Thanks, Andrea. 00:01:37.400 --> 00:01:46.140 Any other questions on the consent agenda? Okay. I will 00:01:46.140 --> 00:01:48.799 move us to items for 00:01:48.799 --> 00:01:53.030 individual consideration and I'll call on Haley for 00:01:53.030 --> 00:01:58.680 presentation of FP 17-0028. 00:02:08.599 --> 00:02:11.310 All right. Good evening. This is the final plat for Creeks 00:02:11.310 --> 00:02:13.560 ide. So we saw the 00:02:13.560 --> 00:02:18.039 preliminary plat for this a few weeks ago. So same layout 00:02:18.039 --> 00:02:19.199 as we saw with the 00:02:19.199 --> 00:02:23.740 preliminary, the final plat containing 137 residential lots 00:02:23.740 --> 00:02:24.840 and the four HOA 00:02:24.840 --> 00:02:27.909 lots. If you remember, Creekside is the subdivision on 00:02:27.909 --> 00:02:29.240 south side of Ryan Road 00:02:29.240 --> 00:02:32.000 that's part of a pre-annexation development agreement. So 00:02:32.000 --> 00:02:32.840 pending 00:02:32.840 --> 00:02:35.229 approval of the final plat, they will then voluntarily 00:02:35.229 --> 00:02:36.400 annex into the city and 00:02:36.400 --> 00:02:39.520 proceed with their development. And this is an item for 00:02:39.520 --> 00:02:40.919 individual consideration 00:02:40.919 --> 00:02:44.280 because we do have one condition on the approval. That 00:02:44.280 --> 00:02:45.319 being that the civil 00:02:45.319 --> 00:02:47.719 engineering construction plans for all public 00:02:47.719 --> 00:02:49.439 infrastructure necessary to serve 00:02:49.439 --> 00:02:52.039 the development must be approved before the plat is filed. 00:02:52.039 --> 00:02:53.360 If any utility 00:02:53.360 --> 00:02:56.710 easements or other minor changes need to occur as a result 00:02:56.710 --> 00:02:57.719 of that final CEP 00:02:57.719 --> 00:03:00.099 review, we would ask that that be approval by staff rather 00:03:00.099 --> 00:03:00.680 than having to 00:03:00.680 --> 00:03:02.590 bring the plat back forward to the Planning and Zoning 00:03:02.590 --> 00:03:03.479 Commission. Okay. 00:03:03.479 --> 00:03:08.280 Commissioner Rozelle. Thank you, Chair. The condition, I 00:03:08.280 --> 00:03:09.560 take it that's done 00:03:09.560 --> 00:03:14.810 because of the annexation into the city? No, it is actually 00:03:14.810 --> 00:03:15.800 a standard procedure 00:03:15.800 --> 00:03:18.280 that CEPs are typically approved prior to a final plat 00:03:18.280 --> 00:03:19.479 being approved. In this 00:03:19.479 --> 00:03:22.199 case, they were kind of running neck-and-neck. The CEPs 00:03:22.199 --> 00:03:23.080 just weren't quite 00:03:23.080 --> 00:03:25.240 there yet and the applicant asked that we go ahead and move 00:03:25.240 --> 00:03:25.879 the final plat 00:03:25.879 --> 00:03:29.229 forward and let them continue working on those civil plans. 00:03:29.229 --> 00:03:30.120 So those will 00:03:30.120 --> 00:03:33.409 now just be approved before the plat is filed. Is there any 00:03:33.409 --> 00:03:35.539 other processes that 00:03:35.539 --> 00:03:39.520 the city goes through to make sure that what once was 00:03:39.520 --> 00:03:41.639 County land or ETJ is 00:03:41.639 --> 00:03:44.580 now city? Is there any other requirements that they have to 00:03:44.580 --> 00:03:45.159 abide by? 00:03:45.159 --> 00:03:49.960 I don't know if that question makes sense. I'm just curious 00:03:49.960 --> 00:03:52.719 about what changes to their 00:03:52.719 --> 00:03:55.699 requirements in a city? Do they have to file anything 00:03:55.699 --> 00:03:58.360 additional to come up to speed with 00:03:58.360 --> 00:04:02.020 city rules? This one's kind of unique because it does have 00:04:02.020 --> 00:04:02.879 that pre-annexation 00:04:02.879 --> 00:04:04.759 development agreement. So their entire process, they've 00:04:04.759 --> 00:04:05.759 essentially been following 00:04:05.759 --> 00:04:07.960 the city rules while in the county. The plat is what will 00:04:07.960 --> 00:04:08.840 ultimately trigger 00:04:08.840 --> 00:04:11.370 their annexation and so from that point forward they'll go 00:04:11.370 --> 00:04:12.280 through the standard 00:04:12.280 --> 00:04:15.169 city processes for permitting and everything else with 00:04:15.169 --> 00:04:16.000 their development. 00:04:16.000 --> 00:04:21.750 Gotcha, so they were following basic? Yes. Okay, thank you. 00:04:21.750 --> 00:04:24.720 Any question I'd have is on 00:04:24.720 --> 00:04:28.310 the CEP, have they done at least one or two reviews on that 00:04:28.310 --> 00:04:29.839 ? Yes, in this case 00:04:29.839 --> 00:04:32.829 the CEP it's at the very tail end. It's been through three 00:04:32.829 --> 00:04:33.720 reviews with staff 00:04:33.720 --> 00:04:36.439 and is ultimately approvable. Just a few minor tweaks. I 00:04:36.439 --> 00:04:37.600 know how that works. Great, 00:04:37.600 --> 00:04:43.259 thank you. Any other questions on this item? Commissioner 00:04:43.259 --> 00:04:44.519 Beck. I do have some 00:04:44.519 --> 00:04:47.699 questions, just some concerns and again just some curios 00:04:47.699 --> 00:04:49.920 ities here if I may. Sure. 00:04:49.920 --> 00:04:52.959 Thank you, Chair. The dirt road that's coming off Orion 00:04:52.959 --> 00:04:55.000 currently runs behind 00:04:55.000 --> 00:05:00.879 that first house on Andrew. So looking at this obviously 00:05:00.879 --> 00:05:02.579 that entrance to that 00:05:02.579 --> 00:05:06.829 dirt road that's there now is gonna go away and it'll be 00:05:06.829 --> 00:05:09.519 part of that HOA area? 00:05:09.519 --> 00:05:12.279 Yes, the dirt road that they're currently is the access for 00:05:12.279 --> 00:05:12.920 the gas well pad 00:05:12.920 --> 00:05:16.180 site. The gas well has been plugged and ever all the 00:05:16.180 --> 00:05:17.000 equipment removed from 00:05:17.000 --> 00:05:19.189 the site so that road will be integrated into the 00:05:19.189 --> 00:05:20.120 development and should 00:05:20.120 --> 00:05:23.689 fall within this HOA lot. Okay, okay. Also the plat also 00:05:23.689 --> 00:05:24.800 shows what looks like a 00:05:24.800 --> 00:05:27.949 right-of-way where Thistle Ridge down there from the 00:05:27.949 --> 00:05:29.279 development to the east 00:05:29.279 --> 00:05:37.439 whatever that whatever that is will connect eventually to 00:05:37.439 --> 00:05:38.519 Mallard Avenue. 00:05:38.519 --> 00:05:44.389 It looks like in the Creekside development. Yes, yeah, see 00:05:44.389 --> 00:05:45.079 is that what 00:05:45.079 --> 00:05:50.449 that is? Thistle Ridge will not actually be a through 00:05:50.449 --> 00:05:51.480 street in this case. This 00:05:51.480 --> 00:05:54.870 this is an HOA lot they are tying in here for a waterline 00:05:54.870 --> 00:05:56.959 extension. Okay. But 00:05:56.959 --> 00:05:59.670 Thistle Ridge Road won't continue. It'll stay a dead end 00:05:59.670 --> 00:06:02.959 there. Okay and block A1 which is the HOA area. 00:06:02.959 --> 00:06:06.930 What limitations will be established for this track that 00:06:06.930 --> 00:06:07.759 separates Creekside 00:06:07.759 --> 00:06:12.519 from its neighbors? Will it remain kind of a green space or 00:06:12.519 --> 00:06:13.279 will there be any 00:06:13.279 --> 00:06:18.220 construction allowed on it? So the HOA lot is designed to 00:06:18.220 --> 00:06:20.480 be a it's mostly their 00:06:20.480 --> 00:06:22.860 tree preservation area. It will have a walking trail that 00:06:22.860 --> 00:06:23.720 meanders through the 00:06:23.720 --> 00:06:27.279 trees. Okay. But that is going to primarily be landscaped 00:06:27.279 --> 00:06:28.720 area with most of those 00:06:28.720 --> 00:06:32.069 trees left in place the trail kind of winding through them. 00:06:32.069 --> 00:06:32.759 I guess what I'm 00:06:32.759 --> 00:06:35.879 asking though is sometime down the future down the road 00:06:35.879 --> 00:06:37.240 will that can that 00:06:37.240 --> 00:06:41.209 change where they can do things beyond this? That is their 00:06:41.209 --> 00:06:41.740 approved tree 00:06:41.740 --> 00:06:44.180 preservation area so it would it would be unlikely that 00:06:44.180 --> 00:06:45.240 they would ever. Would 00:06:45.240 --> 00:06:47.709 they have to come before us or some other Commissioner 00:06:47.709 --> 00:06:48.600 Board? Since it's 00:06:48.600 --> 00:06:50.750 planted as an HOA lot if they ever tried to subdivide yet 00:06:50.750 --> 00:06:51.720 that would would come 00:06:51.720 --> 00:06:55.689 back. Okay. The eastern edge of this track it's running 00:06:55.689 --> 00:06:57.360 along an established ESA is 00:06:57.360 --> 00:07:00.800 that correct? From Ryan Road to Creekdale? Yes there is ESA 00:07:00.800 --> 00:07:02.480 floodplain and riparian 00:07:02.480 --> 00:07:04.680 buffer. And as it stands now we're not going to be encro 00:07:04.680 --> 00:07:05.720 aching in that area. 00:07:05.720 --> 00:07:08.949 There's a very minimal overlap kind of up here. This is 00:07:08.949 --> 00:07:10.000 where the amenity center 00:07:10.000 --> 00:07:12.899 will eventually be. There is some overlap here. Their pre 00:07:12.899 --> 00:07:13.560 annexation 00:07:13.560 --> 00:07:16.730 development agreement allowed 10% of that area to be encro 00:07:16.730 --> 00:07:18.120 ached upon to allow 00:07:18.120 --> 00:07:20.509 for some retaining walls to be put in for the amenity 00:07:20.509 --> 00:07:21.519 center but that will 00:07:21.519 --> 00:07:26.310 primarily be left intact. Okay no ESA will be required then 00:07:26.310 --> 00:07:28.040 ? No. Okay. 00:07:28.040 --> 00:07:31.680 And lastly there's two means of egresses into Creekside. 00:07:31.680 --> 00:07:32.959 There's the Creekside 00:07:32.959 --> 00:07:38.430 Drive on the north end south north end yeah and then on the 00:07:38.430 --> 00:07:39.560 south end. 00:07:42.120 --> 00:07:47.779 Creekdale I'm sorry let me read my notes here. Creekside 00:07:47.779 --> 00:07:49.240 Drive off of Ryan Road and the 00:07:49.240 --> 00:07:52.660 new road meandering way that will connect to Creekdale 00:07:52.660 --> 00:07:53.720 Drive on the south. 00:07:53.720 --> 00:07:57.220 Is that correct? Yes. Okay now Creekdale dead ends at Th 00:07:57.220 --> 00:08:00.639 istle Way on the west and 00:08:00.639 --> 00:08:09.560 dead ends into the ESA that area on the east. So any plans 00:08:09.560 --> 00:08:11.800 on I mean do we have 00:08:11.800 --> 00:08:14.569 any idea if that's gonna be the Creekdale is gonna be 00:08:14.569 --> 00:08:15.540 extended one way 00:08:15.540 --> 00:08:18.980 or the other because it seems like we talked about at one 00:08:18.980 --> 00:08:20.360 time where that 00:08:20.360 --> 00:08:23.759 would reach out the country club road. Is that something 00:08:23.759 --> 00:08:24.800 you can address here? 00:08:24.800 --> 00:08:27.949 I'm not familiar with any specific plans to extend Creek 00:08:27.949 --> 00:08:30.000 dale at this time. None of 00:08:30.000 --> 00:08:32.909 it would be done as a part of this subdivision so if you 00:08:32.909 --> 00:08:33.600 know if another 00:08:33.600 --> 00:08:36.299 subdivision comes in in this area I suspect they would be 00:08:36.299 --> 00:08:37.200 requested to to tie 00:08:37.200 --> 00:08:40.549 into Creekdale and extend that. So people coming down the 00:08:40.549 --> 00:08:41.700 entering way can hit 00:08:41.700 --> 00:08:45.480 Creekdale and then go back out Andrew if they wanted to but 00:08:45.480 --> 00:08:48.919 I believe so. 00:08:49.639 --> 00:08:55.360 Okay that's it thank you. I'll have one follow-up question 00:08:55.360 --> 00:08:55.559 and 00:08:55.559 --> 00:09:01.970 Commissioner Beck's comment about the HOA. Who actually 00:09:01.970 --> 00:09:04.399 owns that property the 00:09:04.399 --> 00:09:10.399 HOA property? Is there a mechanism with the city as to when 00:09:10.399 --> 00:09:11.000 that interest 00:09:11.000 --> 00:09:14.970 transfers over because I know that's been some issues in 00:09:14.970 --> 00:09:16.539 the past? The current 00:09:16.539 --> 00:09:20.929 owner for all of it would be this DD Creekside partnership 00:09:20.929 --> 00:09:22.240 as to when the HOA 00:09:22.240 --> 00:09:23.889 would take that over I'm not sure that would be written 00:09:23.889 --> 00:09:24.960 into their restrictions 00:09:24.960 --> 00:09:27.639 and covenants for the subdivision as to when the HOA would 00:09:27.639 --> 00:09:28.679 actually take over 00:09:28.679 --> 00:09:31.320 ownership versus the developer. I mean it's usually once a 00:09:31.320 --> 00:09:32.240 certain percentage of 00:09:32.240 --> 00:09:34.279 homes have been developed but I'm not sure what that 00:09:34.279 --> 00:09:35.320 specific would be in this 00:09:35.320 --> 00:09:46.440 case. Okay thank you. Any other questions on this item? 00:09:46.440 --> 00:09:48.360 Okay Haley I think you've 00:09:48.360 --> 00:09:55.200 got the next one too. This will be FP 17-0026. 00:09:55.960 --> 00:10:01.110 Yes so this is the final plat for CarMax off of I-35. I 00:10:01.110 --> 00:10:02.679 think you've seen this a 00:10:02.679 --> 00:10:05.350 couple of times before you now with their detailed plan for 00:10:05.350 --> 00:10:06.120 the PD amendment 00:10:06.120 --> 00:10:10.419 and then the preliminary plat. So this is a 34 acre tract 00:10:10.419 --> 00:10:12.279 roughly a large portion 00:10:12.279 --> 00:10:15.610 of it as you see here in the hatched area is various degree 00:10:15.610 --> 00:10:16.919 of floodplain and 00:10:16.919 --> 00:10:21.080 ESA. They're actually only developing approximately seven 00:10:21.080 --> 00:10:21.840 acres here on the 00:10:21.840 --> 00:10:24.259 northern or I'm sorry yeah that'd be the north end of the 00:10:24.259 --> 00:10:25.720 property along I-35 00:10:25.720 --> 00:10:29.690 for the CarMax and once again in this case we have a 00:10:29.690 --> 00:10:31.000 similar condition where 00:10:31.000 --> 00:10:34.590 civil engineering plans will need to be approved prior to 00:10:34.590 --> 00:10:35.919 the plat being filed 00:10:35.919 --> 00:10:38.879 and then if any minor changes such as utility easements 00:10:38.879 --> 00:10:40.159 arise from that review 00:10:40.159 --> 00:10:42.929 we would ask that those be approval by staff rather than 00:10:42.929 --> 00:10:44.000 coming back before the 00:10:44.000 --> 00:10:47.970 PNC for approval. I can answer any other questions on this 00:10:47.970 --> 00:10:49.120 one. Commissioner Beck. 00:10:49.120 --> 00:10:53.080 Thank you Chair. Yeah I was concerned that are they buying 00:10:53.080 --> 00:10:54.320 the whole 34 acres? 00:10:54.320 --> 00:11:00.360 Is that going to technically be their property? Yes yeah it 00:11:00.360 --> 00:11:01.039 will it will all be 00:11:01.039 --> 00:11:03.730 under the same ownership because of the confines with the 00:11:03.730 --> 00:11:04.440 floodplain and 00:11:04.440 --> 00:11:06.850 everything there's really about seven acres that they're 00:11:06.850 --> 00:11:07.639 seeking to use for 00:11:07.639 --> 00:11:10.399 for their car lot at this point. So they're gonna be 00:11:10.399 --> 00:11:11.759 confined pretty much at seven 00:11:11.759 --> 00:11:14.960 acres and they really can't extend any further unless they 00:11:14.960 --> 00:11:15.600 get special 00:11:15.600 --> 00:11:17.980 permission from... Yeah it would take some work at that 00:11:17.980 --> 00:11:18.799 point you're working through 00:11:18.799 --> 00:11:22.269 FEMA and potentially with our team for alternative ESAs to 00:11:22.269 --> 00:11:23.399 be able to do any 00:11:23.399 --> 00:11:29.720 work in the floodplain area. Very good thank you. Any other 00:11:29.720 --> 00:11:30.399 questions on this 00:11:30.399 --> 00:11:38.360 item? Okay thank you Haley. We'll move us to our public 00:11:38.360 --> 00:11:40.080 hearing section for this 00:11:40.080 --> 00:11:46.080 evening. We'll call on Chandrian for presentation of FR 17- 00:11:46.080 --> 00:11:48.720 0026A. 00:11:53.440 --> 00:11:57.700 Okay this item is the Owens Ranch replat. It's a 00:11:57.700 --> 00:12:03.919 residential replat for about two 00:12:03.919 --> 00:12:08.100 acres located at the corner of Lake You and Rodeo Drive. 00:12:08.100 --> 00:12:09.440 The applicant is 00:12:09.440 --> 00:12:12.830 intending to replat two lots into three lots for 00:12:12.830 --> 00:12:15.320 residential purposes. It meets 00:12:15.320 --> 00:12:19.700 all of the established criteria and if you remember this 00:12:19.700 --> 00:12:21.159 was posted for the 00:12:21.159 --> 00:12:25.139 February 21st agenda and it's been continued to this 00:12:25.139 --> 00:12:32.240 meeting. Any questions? 00:12:32.919 --> 00:12:39.120 That's an easy one for you. Yeah. You got the next one too. 00:12:39.120 --> 00:12:43.720 We'll move on to item B Z 18-0005 00:12:43.720 --> 00:12:47.690 and Chandrian will present this as well. Okay this is a rez 00:12:47.690 --> 00:12:49.480 oning request for the 00:12:49.480 --> 00:12:53.639 property the Denton Baptist Temple property located off of 00:12:53.639 --> 00:12:56.039 35 just west of 00:12:56.039 --> 00:13:01.789 sorry just west of Fort Worth. So the request is to rezone 00:13:01.789 --> 00:13:02.679 approximately five 00:13:02.679 --> 00:13:09.059 acres from DR 1 to DR from DR 1 and DR 2 to a DCG district. 00:13:09.059 --> 00:13:11.639 The property here, let 00:13:11.639 --> 00:13:17.399 me just give you some context. This is the subject property 00:13:17.399 --> 00:13:19.240 . I-35 is on the 00:13:19.240 --> 00:13:24.889 south here. Bernard Street is the border on the west and 00:13:24.889 --> 00:13:26.240 then Lindsay's to the 00:13:26.240 --> 00:13:30.289 north. The property currently is divided into three zoning 00:13:30.289 --> 00:13:31.360 districts and so the 00:13:31.360 --> 00:13:34.799 applicant is intending to rezone into one district to allow 00:13:34.799 --> 00:13:35.419 for a more 00:13:35.419 --> 00:13:40.649 cohesive development in the future. And this property was 00:13:40.649 --> 00:13:42.159 also... Commissioner back. 00:13:42.159 --> 00:13:44.919 Thank you Chair. With that in mind do they have something 00:13:44.919 --> 00:13:46.159 particular in mind or is this 00:13:46.159 --> 00:13:49.769 just to so it all be one thing when it comes to them? There 00:13:49.769 --> 00:13:50.720 's nothing in the 00:13:50.720 --> 00:13:54.159 works right now as far as... Correct. As far as I know and 00:13:54.159 --> 00:13:54.960 as far as they've 00:13:54.960 --> 00:13:58.309 communicated to the city they don't have any plans just yet 00:13:58.309 --> 00:13:59.080 to develop the 00:13:59.080 --> 00:14:01.720 property. But when they do they want this nice neat little 00:14:01.720 --> 00:14:06.360 page. Correct. Okay thanks. And then I will note that this 00:14:06.360 --> 00:14:09.159 property was subject to some tech start right away 00:14:09.159 --> 00:14:11.320 acquisition and so they lost 00:14:11.320 --> 00:14:17.389 about almost two acres along the frontage. So. Other 00:14:17.389 --> 00:14:19.120 parking. I won't go into 00:14:19.120 --> 00:14:23.279 everything because we'll have the presentation in regular 00:14:23.279 --> 00:14:24.720 session. But 00:14:24.720 --> 00:14:29.639 when we do the future land use analysis we find that the 00:14:29.639 --> 00:14:30.360 subject property 00:14:30.360 --> 00:14:34.330 is designated as community mixed use. The intent of that 00:14:34.330 --> 00:14:35.720 zoning, that land use 00:14:35.720 --> 00:14:39.690 category is to promote a mix of uses which include 00:14:39.690 --> 00:14:41.720 commercial residential and 00:14:41.720 --> 00:14:48.350 service uses. And so when you look at this area this zoning 00:14:48.350 --> 00:14:49.639 ... this the 00:14:49.639 --> 00:14:53.820 requested zoning designation matches what's on the ground 00:14:53.820 --> 00:14:55.919 already. You have 00:14:55.919 --> 00:14:59.909 the church property here. There's some single-family here 00:14:59.909 --> 00:15:02.039 along just west of 00:15:02.039 --> 00:15:05.320 Bernard. And then to the north there's some multi-family 00:15:05.320 --> 00:15:07.080 uses here. And then 00:15:07.080 --> 00:15:09.799 along Fort Worth Drive and then as you get closer to Fort 00:15:09.799 --> 00:15:10.720 Worth there's some 00:15:10.720 --> 00:15:14.370 more commercial uses. The Motel 6 is here. Water Burger, 00:15:14.370 --> 00:15:18.039 gas stations. So what we 00:15:18.039 --> 00:15:20.669 found was that the request is consistent with the future 00:15:20.669 --> 00:15:23.600 land use plan. And in 00:15:23.600 --> 00:15:29.100 terms of public facilities water and wastewater would be 00:15:29.100 --> 00:15:30.879 available pretty 00:15:30.879 --> 00:15:35.100 much along all of the street frontages. Bernard here, 00:15:35.100 --> 00:15:36.480 Lindsay to the north. 00:15:36.480 --> 00:15:40.450 There's an easement here but I'm not sure if that serves 00:15:40.450 --> 00:15:41.720 the properties that 00:15:41.720 --> 00:15:44.950 front Fort Worth but that analysis will be done when we get 00:15:44.950 --> 00:15:46.039 into planning and 00:15:46.039 --> 00:15:51.600 site development. I don't anticipate any other dedications 00:15:51.600 --> 00:15:52.159 or street 00:15:52.159 --> 00:15:56.960 improvements just because the property is already served. 00:15:56.960 --> 00:15:59.039 According to... in 00:15:59.039 --> 00:16:03.009 accordance with the local government code we issued 11 00:16:03.009 --> 00:16:04.000 notices to properties 00:16:04.000 --> 00:16:07.399 within 200 feet of the subject property. We haven't 00:16:07.399 --> 00:16:08.799 received any letters of 00:16:08.799 --> 00:16:12.769 opposition or in favor basically no responses yet. We 00:16:12.769 --> 00:16:14.039 issued 68 courtesy 00:16:14.039 --> 00:16:18.009 notices to the property within 500 feet and then the 00:16:18.009 --> 00:16:18.639 neighbor... the 00:16:18.639 --> 00:16:22.019 applicant opted not to do the neighborhood meeting. He just 00:16:22.019 --> 00:16:22.960 went and 00:16:22.960 --> 00:16:28.330 contacted the six homeowners that are in that little enc 00:16:28.330 --> 00:16:31.720 lave here. So with that 00:16:31.720 --> 00:16:35.570 because this is consistent with the future land use plan 00:16:35.570 --> 00:16:36.639 and it's compatible 00:16:36.639 --> 00:16:40.610 with the existing area staff is recommending approval. 00:16:40.610 --> 00:16:41.279 Commissioner 00:16:41.279 --> 00:16:44.509 Roseau. You mentioned that he went directly to the six 00:16:44.509 --> 00:16:46.559 houses to the west. 00:16:46.559 --> 00:16:50.409 Yeah this neighborhood here. Do we know what that feedback 00:16:50.409 --> 00:16:52.480 was from those six? 00:16:52.480 --> 00:16:56.039 I don't have that in my notes but I can ask before we get 00:16:56.039 --> 00:16:57.240 to regular session. 00:16:57.240 --> 00:17:00.649 And if I understand it correctly those are the only single 00:17:00.649 --> 00:17:01.759 detached family 00:17:01.759 --> 00:17:05.730 within the 500 feet right? Correct. Well within the 200 00:17:05.730 --> 00:17:07.799 feet and 500. Right. Most 00:17:07.799 --> 00:17:10.359 of everything is either commercial or it's multifamily. 00:17:10.359 --> 00:17:12.880 Okay thank you. 00:17:12.880 --> 00:17:16.960 Commissioner Beck. Thank you chair. It seems odd to me that 00:17:16.960 --> 00:17:17.720 looking at the 00:17:17.720 --> 00:17:23.539 future land use map it's set up to be CMG yet he decided to 00:17:23.539 --> 00:17:27.079 go with DCG. What kind of was... 00:17:27.079 --> 00:17:30.359 do you have any idea why he chose that particular zoning 00:17:30.359 --> 00:17:31.640 district as opposed to 00:17:31.640 --> 00:17:36.319 something that's obviously you know the city has future 00:17:36.319 --> 00:17:38.000 plans for? Okay. I mean 00:17:38.000 --> 00:17:42.519 would it not meet his needs or did he point out why DCG is 00:17:42.519 --> 00:17:44.480 opposed to CMG? Yes. 00:17:44.480 --> 00:17:48.450 DCG was the logical choice just because there's already 00:17:48.450 --> 00:17:50.599 existing DCG zoning to 00:17:50.599 --> 00:17:54.839 the east and so they would extend that into the property. 00:17:54.839 --> 00:17:58.440 Anything else with it 00:17:58.440 --> 00:18:02.630 could possibly meet the future land use plan but I think it 00:18:02.630 --> 00:18:03.880 's just it was just 00:18:03.880 --> 00:18:06.920 safer to go with what was adjacent so that it doesn't 00:18:06.920 --> 00:18:08.359 create the case of spot 00:18:08.359 --> 00:18:12.480 zoning. Okay. Thanks. 00:18:15.000 --> 00:18:21.829 Any other questions on this item? Okay. Thank you, Shandrin 00:18:21.829 --> 00:18:22.400 . 00:18:40.720 --> 00:18:45.400 Okay. Well we got through that pretty quick so there are no 00:18:45.400 --> 00:18:46.279 work session 00:18:46.279 --> 00:18:51.930 reports so at 550 we'll close our work session and we'll 00:18:51.930 --> 00:18:53.119 reconvene in council 00:18:53.119 --> 00:18:56.359 chambers at 630. 00:19:04.000 --> 00:19:04.970 Good evening and welcome to the City of Denton Planning and 00:19:04.970 --> 00:19:07.839 Zoning Commission 00:19:07.839 --> 00:19:14.039 meeting for March the 21st 2018. This meeting has been duly 00:19:14.039 --> 00:19:14.960 posted and we do 00:19:14.960 --> 00:19:19.720 have a quorum present. We'll call us to order at 637. Our 00:19:19.720 --> 00:19:20.960 first order of business 00:19:20.960 --> 00:19:25.680 will be to stand and give the pledge the US and Texas flag. 00:19:37.839 --> 00:19:42.160 Under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. 00:19:44.160 --> 00:19:50.150 Honor the Texas flag. I pledge allegiance to the Texas, one 00:19:50.150 --> 00:19:54.160 state, under God, one and indivisible. 00:20:05.119 --> 00:20:09.410 Next item on our agenda will be to consider our minutes for 00:20:09.410 --> 00:20:10.640 our March 7th 00:20:10.640 --> 00:20:14.609 meeting. Commissioner Roselle. I move for approval. 00:20:14.609 --> 00:20:16.720 Commissioner Beck. Second. Okay. 00:20:16.720 --> 00:20:22.369 We have a first and a second for approval. Any discussion? 00:20:22.369 --> 00:20:24.140 Seeing none, call 00:20:24.140 --> 00:20:33.769 for a vote on the board. Motion is going to carry five to 00:20:33.769 --> 00:20:36.839 zero. That will move us 00:20:36.839 --> 00:20:42.799 to our consent agenda. Commissioner Beck. I move to approve 00:20:42.799 --> 00:20:43.799 the consent agenda. 00:20:43.799 --> 00:20:47.769 Okay. Commissioner Smith. I second this motion. Okay. We 00:20:47.769 --> 00:20:48.640 have a first and a 00:20:48.640 --> 00:20:54.480 second for approval. Any discussion? Seeing none, I will 00:20:54.480 --> 00:20:57.519 call for a vote on the board. 00:21:04.759 --> 00:21:09.130 The motion will carry five to zero. We'll move us to our 00:21:09.130 --> 00:21:11.920 items for individual 00:21:11.920 --> 00:21:15.400 consideration. This time I will call on Haley for 00:21:15.400 --> 00:21:18.559 presentation of FP 17-002. 00:21:18.559 --> 00:21:30.990 Good evening. This is the final plat for the Creekside 00:21:30.990 --> 00:21:32.119 addition. It's 00:21:32.119 --> 00:21:36.089 approximately 47 acres on the south side of Ryan Road. The 00:21:36.089 --> 00:21:38.160 plat is for 137 00:21:38.160 --> 00:21:41.390 residential lots and three common area lots. This is being 00:21:41.390 --> 00:21:42.680 brought forward as 00:21:42.680 --> 00:21:45.309 an item for individual consideration because staff has 00:21:45.309 --> 00:21:46.400 requested a condition 00:21:46.400 --> 00:21:49.000 on the approval. That condition would be that civil 00:21:49.000 --> 00:21:50.279 engineering construction 00:21:50.279 --> 00:21:52.819 plans for all public infrastructure necessary to serve the 00:21:52.819 --> 00:21:53.279 proposed 00:21:53.279 --> 00:21:56.349 development must be approved before the plat is filed. If 00:21:56.349 --> 00:21:57.319 any utility easement 00:21:57.319 --> 00:21:59.730 locations need to be modified as a result of the final 00:21:59.730 --> 00:22:00.680 civil engineering 00:22:00.680 --> 00:22:03.799 construction plans, the development review committee 00:22:03.799 --> 00:22:04.640 approval would be 00:22:04.640 --> 00:22:08.609 required for those prior to filing. And with that I could 00:22:08.609 --> 00:22:09.240 stand for any 00:22:09.240 --> 00:22:11.599 questions. 00:22:16.400 --> 00:22:19.220 I think you did a great job in the presentation at work 00:22:19.220 --> 00:22:20.559 session. It doesn't 00:22:20.559 --> 00:22:24.309 look like we have any questions. And the applicant is here 00:22:24.309 --> 00:22:24.880 if you had any 00:22:24.880 --> 00:22:31.579 questions of him as well. Okay. I do have a request to 00:22:31.579 --> 00:22:34.359 speak on this item. Thomas 00:22:34.359 --> 00:22:42.049 Fletcher. Good evening Commissioners. My name is Thomas F 00:22:42.049 --> 00:22:43.900 letcher, 5750 Genesis 00:22:43.900 --> 00:22:48.220 Court, Frisco, Texas 75034. I am the applicant for the 00:22:48.220 --> 00:22:50.160 owner and developer of 00:22:50.160 --> 00:22:55.359 this tract. Just wanted to say a brief word and then be 00:22:55.359 --> 00:22:56.400 available to answer any 00:22:56.400 --> 00:22:59.900 questions you may have. At the preliminary plat hearing I 00:22:59.900 --> 00:23:00.440 know one of 00:23:00.440 --> 00:23:02.950 the questions one of the Commissioners had asked was 00:23:02.950 --> 00:23:03.920 regarding the tree 00:23:03.920 --> 00:23:07.559 preservation. At that time I made the comment that I 00:23:07.559 --> 00:23:09.799 believe it was 60 to 65% 00:23:09.799 --> 00:23:14.500 was going to be the estimated tree preservation. We've done 00:23:14.500 --> 00:23:14.839 the the 00:23:14.839 --> 00:23:17.740 construction plans, the tree survey, we're actually 00:23:17.740 --> 00:23:22.160 preserving 81.9% of trees, 76.3% 00:23:22.160 --> 00:23:27.809 based off caliper inches. So we've well exceeded what we 00:23:27.809 --> 00:23:27.960 had 00:23:27.960 --> 00:23:30.859 estimated for the tree preservation. So going through the 00:23:30.859 --> 00:23:32.000 construction drawing 00:23:32.000 --> 00:23:36.559 process we've been very conscious of preservation of trees 00:23:36.559 --> 00:23:37.640 to make this a 00:23:37.640 --> 00:23:41.650 really special development and just wanted to mention that 00:23:41.650 --> 00:23:42.640 and I'll be glad 00:23:42.640 --> 00:23:45.609 to answer any questions that you may have. Do you have one 00:23:45.609 --> 00:23:46.599 so far? Commissioner 00:23:46.599 --> 00:23:50.000 Smith. Thank you Chair. Since we went through approve the 00:23:50.000 --> 00:23:51.680 preliminary plat, have you had any more 00:23:51.680 --> 00:23:55.029 conversations with the citizens over in Thistle Hills 00:23:55.029 --> 00:23:56.839 development? The evening, 00:23:56.839 --> 00:24:00.440 yes sir, the evening after the preliminary plat or that 00:24:00.440 --> 00:24:01.480 same evening we 00:24:01.480 --> 00:24:05.450 met with the owner and I met with several of the residents 00:24:05.450 --> 00:24:06.519 afterwards and 00:24:06.519 --> 00:24:10.680 just talked in general about the project and the feedback 00:24:10.680 --> 00:24:11.960 we got from them is 00:24:11.960 --> 00:24:15.160 that really they just wanted to know more about the project 00:24:15.160 --> 00:24:16.359 . They didn't have 00:24:16.359 --> 00:24:19.529 because it was under a pre-annexation development agreement 00:24:19.529 --> 00:24:20.519 , they really didn't 00:24:20.519 --> 00:24:23.750 have a good idea of what was what was being proposed but 00:24:23.750 --> 00:24:25.000 when they came to the 00:24:25.000 --> 00:24:27.890 the hearing on the preliminary plat, learned about the 00:24:27.890 --> 00:24:29.039 buffer, learned about 00:24:29.039 --> 00:24:31.930 the tree preservation, that set their mind at ease and they 00:24:31.930 --> 00:24:32.640 were actually 00:24:32.640 --> 00:24:35.950 excited for the project because they they knew that 00:24:35.950 --> 00:24:37.640 something other than what 00:24:37.640 --> 00:24:41.160 we're doing could have come in that would have taken out a 00:24:41.160 --> 00:24:42.000 lot much larger 00:24:42.000 --> 00:24:46.059 percentage of the trees. Great, thank you. Commissioner 00:24:46.059 --> 00:24:47.799 Beck. Thank you Chair. Mr. 00:24:47.799 --> 00:24:49.950 Fletcher, thank you for that bit of good news and to the 00:24:49.950 --> 00:24:50.960 owner too for the 00:24:50.960 --> 00:24:54.599 preservation of trees. I usually fuss about that more than 00:24:54.599 --> 00:24:55.400 others but that is 00:24:55.400 --> 00:24:58.150 important. I'm glad you're taking steps you are to preserve 00:24:58.150 --> 00:24:58.960 that extra bit so 00:24:58.960 --> 00:25:03.200 thank you so much. You're welcome, thank you. Any other 00:25:03.200 --> 00:25:03.839 questions for the 00:25:03.839 --> 00:25:12.400 applicant? Thank you. This item is on our individual 00:25:12.400 --> 00:25:13.680 consideration. It's not a 00:25:13.680 --> 00:25:15.769 public hearing but if anybody would like to speak on this 00:25:15.769 --> 00:25:16.880 item you're welcome to 00:25:16.880 --> 00:25:24.579 do so. Okay seeing none we will continue on. Commissioner 00:25:24.579 --> 00:25:26.200 Rozelle. I motion for 00:25:26.200 --> 00:25:30.559 approval with the staff recommendation of the CEP being 00:25:30.559 --> 00:25:33.160 finalized. Okay. 00:25:33.160 --> 00:25:36.200 Commissioner Smith. Second that motion. Okay we have a 00:25:36.200 --> 00:25:37.359 first and a second for 00:25:37.359 --> 00:25:41.039 approval. Any further discussion? 00:25:45.960 --> 00:25:50.279 With that I'll call for a vote on the board. 00:25:56.200 --> 00:26:07.960 That motion is going to carry five to zero. We'll move us 00:26:07.960 --> 00:26:09.400 to our next item for 00:26:09.400 --> 00:26:16.900 individual consideration which will be FP 17-0026. We'll 00:26:16.900 --> 00:26:17.559 call for on 00:26:17.559 --> 00:26:21.079 Haley for that presentation. 00:26:26.200 --> 00:26:35.440 Okay this is the final plat for the Carmax site. It will be 00:26:35.440 --> 00:26:36.440 located on the 00:26:36.440 --> 00:26:40.660 that would be the southeast or southwest side of Interstate 00:26:40.660 --> 00:26:42.079 35 on the south side 00:26:42.079 --> 00:26:46.049 of town. The total area of the plat is approximately 34 00:26:46.049 --> 00:26:47.720 acres. As you can see 00:26:47.720 --> 00:26:49.950 here in the gray hatched area there is a substantial amount 00:26:49.950 --> 00:26:50.839 of floodplain on the 00:26:50.839 --> 00:26:54.380 property so the developable portion which does have an 00:26:54.380 --> 00:26:55.440 approved detail plan 00:26:55.440 --> 00:26:58.049 within the PD is for about seven acres that would be 00:26:58.049 --> 00:26:59.319 located here on the north 00:26:59.319 --> 00:27:04.000 corner of the property. Similarly to the last plat this is 00:27:04.000 --> 00:27:04.720 an item for individual 00:27:04.720 --> 00:27:07.859 consideration because of a condition that staff is 00:27:07.859 --> 00:27:09.319 recommending that the 00:27:09.319 --> 00:27:11.970 civil engineering construction plans for all infrastructure 00:27:11.970 --> 00:27:12.759 to serve the proposed 00:27:12.759 --> 00:27:15.650 development be submitted and approved prior to the filing 00:27:15.650 --> 00:27:16.680 of the plat. If any 00:27:16.680 --> 00:27:19.619 utility easement locations need to be modified as a result 00:27:19.619 --> 00:27:20.359 of these final 00:27:20.359 --> 00:27:23.430 civil engineering plans DRC approval shall be required 00:27:23.430 --> 00:27:24.440 prior to filing. 00:27:24.440 --> 00:27:27.589 However more extensive changes required as a result of the 00:27:27.589 --> 00:27:29.000 civil plan review may 00:27:29.000 --> 00:27:31.480 consider or may require the final plat come back before the 00:27:31.480 --> 00:27:32.359 Planning and Zoning 00:27:32.359 --> 00:27:36.420 Commission. And with that I'd be happy to answer any 00:27:36.420 --> 00:27:39.000 questions about this. Any 00:27:39.000 --> 00:27:44.170 questions for Haley? Thank you. See none. I don't know if 00:27:44.170 --> 00:27:45.619 the applicants here if they 00:27:45.619 --> 00:27:51.589 would like to speak. You don't have to but you're welcome 00:27:51.589 --> 00:27:52.200 to. 00:27:53.079 --> 00:27:57.049 Good evening Chris Biggers with Dunaway Associates 550 00:27:57.049 --> 00:27:58.160 Bailey in Fort Worth. 00:27:58.160 --> 00:28:00.829 Don't have anything to add but we'd be happy to answer any 00:28:00.829 --> 00:28:01.599 questions should 00:28:01.599 --> 00:28:08.359 there be any. Okay any questions for the applicant? Thank 00:28:08.359 --> 00:28:10.599 you sir. 00:28:16.960 --> 00:28:20.930 Chair I'll open the floor for discussion or motion on this 00:28:20.930 --> 00:28:22.279 item. 00:28:23.079 --> 00:28:27.279 Commissioner Smith. Motion to approve with the condition of 00:28:27.279 --> 00:28:27.920 the CEP be 00:28:27.920 --> 00:28:32.789 approved before this is approved. Okay Commissioner Rossell 00:28:32.789 --> 00:28:35.680 . I second. Okay we 00:28:35.680 --> 00:28:38.819 have a first and a second for approval with the one 00:28:38.819 --> 00:28:40.440 condition as presented in 00:28:40.440 --> 00:28:47.519 the backup. Any further discussion? Seeing none we'll call 00:28:47.519 --> 00:28:50.279 for a vote on board. 00:28:53.079 --> 00:29:06.549 Motion is going to carry five to zero. That will move us to 00:29:06.549 --> 00:29:07.440 our public hearings 00:29:07.440 --> 00:29:10.880 for this evening. I'm going to open the public hearing for 00:29:10.880 --> 00:29:14.640 FR 17-0026A. 00:29:14.640 --> 00:29:19.400 We'll call on Chandrian for presentation. 00:29:21.200 --> 00:29:24.559 Good evening. Good evening. Chandrian Jarvis with the 00:29:24.559 --> 00:29:29.470 development services department. The first item is FR 17-26 00:29:29.470 --> 00:29:29.759 . 00:29:29.759 --> 00:29:33.759 This is a replat request for the Owens Ranch subdivision. 00:29:33.759 --> 00:29:35.319 This is a two acre 00:29:35.319 --> 00:29:39.359 site located at the southeast corner of Owens Ranch in Lake 00:29:39.359 --> 00:29:41.680 view Boulevard. The 00:29:41.680 --> 00:29:45.039 request is to go from two lots to three lots. The plat 00:29:45.039 --> 00:29:46.240 meets all of the 00:29:46.240 --> 00:29:51.900 established criteria. There is a public hearing requirement 00:29:51.900 --> 00:29:53.039 for replats which 00:29:53.039 --> 00:29:59.119 we've just opened. When we issued the staff report we had 00:29:59.119 --> 00:29:59.759 received four 00:29:59.759 --> 00:30:03.079 letters of support and tonight six more letters of 00:30:03.079 --> 00:30:05.000 opposition have come in. I 00:30:05.000 --> 00:30:07.980 just wanted to state that for the record and I will stand 00:30:07.980 --> 00:30:09.240 for any questions. 00:30:09.240 --> 00:30:13.470 Commissioner Smith. Do the opposition notices that came in, 00:30:13.470 --> 00:30:15.400 does that, do we have a 00:30:15.400 --> 00:30:18.480 percentage yet that doesn't bump us into needing supermajor 00:30:18.480 --> 00:30:19.480 ity? And we're not even 00:30:19.480 --> 00:30:22.369 doing supermajority. This is a final replat. Correct. And 00:30:22.369 --> 00:30:23.680 since there is no variance 00:30:23.680 --> 00:30:28.359 associated with the case it doesn't do anything. With that 00:30:28.359 --> 00:30:29.200 plat on there 00:30:29.200 --> 00:30:33.400 we were talking between what's actually now. What is the 00:30:33.400 --> 00:30:35.480 current platting right now? 00:30:35.480 --> 00:30:41.279 Or is the current plat not a current replatting? What 00:30:41.279 --> 00:30:44.480 division is being made within the current property? 00:30:44.480 --> 00:30:48.119 That is a good question and I didn't bring that in my, I 00:30:48.119 --> 00:30:49.200 didn't include that 00:30:49.200 --> 00:30:55.609 in my backup. Okay. Could you? I can. Is the applicant here 00:30:55.609 --> 00:30:58.559 ? If I could possibly? Okay. 00:30:58.559 --> 00:31:01.500 We'll get to that in a minute. I'll ask that question when 00:31:01.500 --> 00:31:04.559 we get to that point. Okay. 00:31:04.559 --> 00:31:11.619 I can probably get to it on GIS but it'll take a second. We 00:31:11.619 --> 00:31:13.480 'll ask the applicant when it comes up here. 00:31:13.480 --> 00:31:20.450 Okay. Thanks, Adrian. I see no other questions. Thank you. 00:31:20.450 --> 00:31:22.839 This is a public hearing and if the 00:31:22.839 --> 00:31:26.930 applicants here, if you would like, please come forward at 00:31:26.930 --> 00:31:27.880 this time. 00:31:35.079 --> 00:31:36.960 Please give us your name and address and then we'll have 10 00:31:36.960 --> 00:31:40.240 minutes. David Snow with Snow 00:31:40.240 --> 00:31:47.589 Investments addresses 325 North Trinity Road, 76208. Okay. 00:31:47.589 --> 00:31:48.079 Thank you. 00:31:51.039 --> 00:31:53.309 Do you have any presentation or just to stand for questions 00:31:53.309 --> 00:31:55.599 ? I didn't actually, I didn't know 00:31:55.599 --> 00:31:58.400 it was going to be put on the spot but I'll answer any 00:31:58.400 --> 00:32:01.279 questions I can. Okay. I'll call on 00:32:01.279 --> 00:32:03.319 Commissioner Smith. I think he had a question of how the 00:32:03.319 --> 00:32:04.960 plat is currently. Sure. Thank you, Chair. 00:32:04.960 --> 00:32:07.599 So you live at the house that's right there on Trinity? 00:32:07.599 --> 00:32:09.359 That's the? Yes, sir. To the east, 00:32:09.359 --> 00:32:12.480 directly to the east. So what's being divided off and why? 00:32:16.240 --> 00:32:21.920 To, the zoning is NR2, two houses per acre. Sure. So there 00:32:21.920 --> 00:32:25.440 was a dogleg parcel of land that was 00:32:25.440 --> 00:32:30.119 bought off the neighbor. Okay. To expand the footage to 00:32:30.119 --> 00:32:32.880 make a single lot. Okay. I guess I'm 00:32:32.880 --> 00:32:37.170 looking at your property on an aerial view. Is that new 00:32:37.170 --> 00:32:40.640 line that's being drawn? Are you just, 00:32:40.640 --> 00:32:43.299 are you drawing a line in your backyard? What exactly are 00:32:43.299 --> 00:32:48.000 you? The new line is further to the 00:32:48.000 --> 00:32:52.819 east which will make 325 a smaller lot but still within a 00:32:52.819 --> 00:32:56.880 half acre. If that answers your question. 00:32:58.640 --> 00:33:03.190 Not quite. Give me one second here. Maybe Shandrian can 00:33:03.190 --> 00:33:05.039 help. We have it up on the board 00:33:05.039 --> 00:33:08.220 for you now and you can maybe show where the current lot 00:33:08.220 --> 00:33:10.799 lines are. Sometimes there's a 00:33:10.799 --> 00:33:12.930 pointer there with. Yeah, Shandrian, we might need to see 00:33:12.930 --> 00:33:15.759 the GIS then or if we can. Okay. 00:33:16.960 --> 00:33:19.440 It just, the reason why I'm asking is because we've had 00:33:19.440 --> 00:33:21.359 small positions come in between 00:33:22.000 --> 00:33:24.579 work session and now that we thought this was going to be 00:33:24.579 --> 00:33:26.319 the easy one tonight. Right. 00:33:28.640 --> 00:33:42.319 Okay. 00:33:58.640 --> 00:34:12.320 [inaudible] 00:34:28.639 --> 00:34:36.320 I'm trying to find the intersection. 00:34:36.320 --> 00:34:36.320 Yeah. 00:34:36.320 --> 00:34:42.320 There we go. 00:34:42.320 --> 00:34:45.599 See what we have. Lakeview. 00:34:45.599 --> 00:34:45.840 Yeah. 00:34:45.840 --> 00:34:50.280 Perfect. All right. There we go. So you guys are, you and 00:34:50.280 --> 00:34:52.000 your neighbor, so the neighbor that's 00:34:52.000 --> 00:34:55.380 there in the corner of Rodeo and Lakeview, you guys are, 00:34:55.380 --> 00:34:57.920 you're combining basically two pieces 00:34:57.920 --> 00:35:01.280 of your property into one new track, one new plat there I 00:35:01.280 --> 00:35:03.840 should say. I'm sorry. I'm sorry 00:35:03.840 --> 00:35:06.550 to repeat that. So you're see what you're doing right now. 00:35:06.550 --> 00:35:08.159 There's two, right? And your neighbor 00:35:08.159 --> 00:35:10.260 has that little dog leg that drops down behind your 00:35:10.260 --> 00:35:13.519 property. You're shaving off a part of your 00:35:13.519 --> 00:35:17.980 property. Shaving off his property, buying a purchase of 00:35:17.980 --> 00:35:20.480 the dog leg and then the property 00:35:20.480 --> 00:35:24.449 line will get some shifted further to the east. Okay. But 00:35:24.449 --> 00:35:26.639 there's still, but you're still creating 00:35:26.639 --> 00:35:30.719 a new line there, the difference between your, basically 00:35:30.719 --> 00:35:33.039 your land is going to stop at your 00:35:33.039 --> 00:35:35.039 fence and then there's going to be a new lot behind it. 00:35:35.039 --> 00:35:35.519 Yes sir. 00:35:35.519 --> 00:35:37.519 Okay. What are your intentions with that? 00:35:37.519 --> 00:35:40.559 Just put a single family residence. 00:35:40.559 --> 00:35:42.559 So you are going to build a single family residence there. 00:35:42.559 --> 00:35:42.559 Yes sir. 00:35:42.559 --> 00:35:45.960 Okay. That's what I was trying to get to. Okay. Great. 00:35:45.960 --> 00:35:47.360 Thank you. 00:35:47.360 --> 00:35:48.159 All right. Thank you very much. 00:35:48.800 --> 00:35:51.250 I think we've got a, hold on just a second. I think we've 00:35:51.250 --> 00:35:54.559 got a better exhibit now to kind of 00:35:54.559 --> 00:35:57.599 show what it is currently and what it's being proposed. 00:36:09.280 --> 00:36:11.679 Okay. Mr. Pryce, that help? 00:36:11.679 --> 00:36:15.280 Yeah, that does. I think just knowing what it currently is 00:36:15.280 --> 00:36:16.079 and then knowing that you're 00:36:16.079 --> 00:36:20.260 going to build a single family there is, that's all I 00:36:20.260 --> 00:36:21.760 needed to know. 00:36:22.880 --> 00:36:23.440 Thank you. 00:36:23.440 --> 00:36:24.159 Thank you very much. 00:36:24.159 --> 00:36:26.079 I think we have a couple more questions for you. 00:36:26.079 --> 00:36:26.800 Commissioner Beck. 00:36:28.159 --> 00:36:33.119 Thank you, Chair. Mr. Snow, thank you for coming tonight. 00:36:33.119 --> 00:36:35.519 Access to this new track where you're 00:36:35.519 --> 00:36:38.010 going to build a new home, is that going to be off Lakeview 00:36:38.010 --> 00:36:38.880 or is it coming? 00:36:38.880 --> 00:36:39.840 It will be off Lakeview. 00:36:39.840 --> 00:36:40.480 Okay. 00:36:40.480 --> 00:36:43.210 And there'll be no reverse onto Lakeview. It'll be a Hamma 00:36:43.210 --> 00:36:44.079 driveway. 00:36:44.079 --> 00:36:48.079 Okay. So your property, which will be behind it or to the 00:36:48.079 --> 00:36:49.199 west, I believe it is. 00:36:49.199 --> 00:36:52.400 That has access through, through, on Trinity. 00:36:53.920 --> 00:36:58.639 Okay. Okay. You've got Lakeview and then Rodeo. Where's 00:36:58.639 --> 00:36:59.199 Trinity at? 00:36:59.199 --> 00:37:01.199 It's where Trinity is to the east. 00:37:17.280 --> 00:37:19.320 This is Trinity Road right there. That's the front of his 00:37:19.320 --> 00:37:19.840 property. 00:37:19.840 --> 00:37:21.519 Okay. Thank you, sir. 00:37:22.159 --> 00:37:25.389 Okay. I don't have any other questions. Thank you, sir, for 00:37:25.389 --> 00:37:25.760 coming up. 00:37:25.760 --> 00:37:26.320 Thank you very much. 00:37:32.800 --> 00:37:37.250 This is a public hearing. I don't have any cards. I do have 00:37:37.250 --> 00:37:38.000 a number of 00:37:39.280 --> 00:37:42.800 letters that were given to us. This is a public hearing. So 00:37:42.800 --> 00:37:43.920 anyone who would like to speak on 00:37:43.920 --> 00:37:46.420 this item is welcome to come forward at this time. And then 00:37:46.420 --> 00:37:47.360 I'll, at the end, 00:37:47.360 --> 00:37:49.519 I will read these comments into the record. 00:37:52.239 --> 00:37:56.210 Anyone else? Okay. With that, I will close the public 00:37:56.210 --> 00:37:57.280 hearing. 00:37:57.280 --> 00:38:02.199 And we've got a letter in opposition from Ronald Basher, 11 00:38:02.199 --> 00:38:04.320 08 Lakeview Drive. 00:38:06.480 --> 00:38:12.159 We have a letter in favor from Dan Cody, 8201 Rodeo Drive. 00:38:13.519 --> 00:38:18.400 We have opposed is Gary Mann's 7608 Rodeo Drive. 00:38:20.480 --> 00:38:26.480 We have opposed Norman Glower, 8017 Stallion Street. 00:38:27.760 --> 00:38:33.179 And then we have in favor is Jerry Istep at 1300 Lakeview 00:38:33.179 --> 00:38:33.840 Boulevard. 00:38:36.559 --> 00:38:42.269 And one more opposed, Hubert Gramling, 1309 Lakeview Boule 00:38:42.269 --> 00:38:43.360 vard. 00:38:44.320 --> 00:38:48.619 And those are all of the comments that we have that we 00:38:48.619 --> 00:38:51.119 received in our backup here right before 00:38:51.119 --> 00:38:55.090 the meeting to read into the record. So with that, I will 00:38:55.090 --> 00:38:57.840 call on Commissioner Beck. 00:38:57.840 --> 00:39:02.090 Thank you, Chair. I'm curious why nobody's come down who's 00:39:02.090 --> 00:39:03.599 in opposition to speak because I 00:39:04.639 --> 00:39:07.570 don't really understand what the opposition is here. Based 00:39:07.570 --> 00:39:09.119 on what I've seen, I'm not sure 00:39:09.119 --> 00:39:13.090 it poses any problem. So is anybody willing that's in the 00:39:13.090 --> 00:39:15.360 audience that is opposed to this can come 00:39:15.360 --> 00:39:21.010 down and clarify this for me? No. Okay. We don't have 00:39:21.010 --> 00:39:24.159 anybody. Okay. They're here for another reason. 00:39:26.639 --> 00:39:31.039 Thank you. Another item. I did close the public hearing. 00:39:32.480 --> 00:39:36.880 And public hearing is closed. And Commissioner Smith. 00:39:36.880 --> 00:39:37.679 Motion to approve. 00:39:39.519 --> 00:39:41.730 Commissioner Roselle. Second. Okay. We have a first and a 00:39:41.730 --> 00:39:45.119 second for approval. Any further discussion? 00:39:47.360 --> 00:39:49.199 Seeing none, we'll call for a vote on the board. 00:39:58.480 --> 00:40:00.559 That motion is going to carry five to zero. 00:40:02.000 --> 00:40:07.559 We'll move us to item B. We'll open the public hearing for 00:40:07.559 --> 00:40:09.920 Z18-0005. 00:40:09.920 --> 00:40:13.119 And I will call on Shandrian for presentation. Okay. 00:40:23.599 --> 00:40:24.239 Okay. This item is a rezoning request for the Denton 00:40:24.239 --> 00:40:29.280 Baptist Temple site. 00:40:30.400 --> 00:40:36.679 It's located at 610 I-35E. The subject property, just to 00:40:36.679 --> 00:40:38.880 give you a point of reference, is located 00:40:38.880 --> 00:40:43.869 here. I-35E is on the south. Bernard Street is here on the 00:40:43.869 --> 00:40:46.559 west. And then Lindsay is the border 00:40:46.559 --> 00:40:50.530 to the north. The applicant has requested to rezone this 00:40:50.530 --> 00:40:52.559 property, which is about five acres, 00:40:53.280 --> 00:40:57.250 from a downtown residential one district and downtown 00:40:57.250 --> 00:40:59.840 residential two, to a DCN or downtown 00:40:59.840 --> 00:41:04.340 commercial general district. The intent of the rezoning 00:41:04.340 --> 00:41:09.599 request is to basically allow for more 00:41:09.599 --> 00:41:12.489 cohesive development in the future. Currently the property 00:41:12.489 --> 00:41:13.920 is divided into three different 00:41:13.920 --> 00:41:17.480 zoning districts. And so, but they're wanting to just go 00:41:17.480 --> 00:41:19.519 ahead and package that in a more 00:41:19.519 --> 00:41:26.050 cohesive manner for future development. Just another point 00:41:26.050 --> 00:41:29.360 of note. This property was 00:41:29.360 --> 00:41:33.360 subject to the text dot acquisition, right away acquisition 00:41:33.360 --> 00:41:36.559 . And so they ended up giving 00:41:36.559 --> 00:41:41.760 about two acres of frontage for the I-35 expansion project. 00:41:44.719 --> 00:41:46.750 When we consider rezoning requests, we have two criteria 00:41:46.750 --> 00:41:48.960 that we tend to look at. 00:41:50.320 --> 00:41:54.170 The first is, does it meet the future land use plan, or the 00:41:54.170 --> 00:41:56.559 Denton 2030 plan? And then two, 00:41:57.760 --> 00:42:01.110 would there be adequate provision of transportation, water, 00:42:01.110 --> 00:42:03.440 sewer, public infrastructure, 00:42:03.440 --> 00:42:06.880 and public services, if the request is granted? So looking 00:42:06.880 --> 00:42:10.000 at the future land use plan, 00:42:10.639 --> 00:42:14.639 the subject property is designated as commercial community 00:42:14.639 --> 00:42:16.880 mixed use. And the intent of community 00:42:16.880 --> 00:42:20.190 mixed use is to promote a mix of uses, including 00:42:20.190 --> 00:42:23.599 residential, commercial, and service uses. 00:42:25.440 --> 00:42:29.099 As you look at the existing zoning and development around 00:42:29.099 --> 00:42:32.719 this site, we find that it is consistent 00:42:32.719 --> 00:42:36.570 with the future land use plan. To the east, we have some 00:42:36.570 --> 00:42:38.639 single family residential, well to the 00:42:38.639 --> 00:42:42.599 west, I keep saying my other east. To the west, there's 00:42:42.599 --> 00:42:45.039 some single family homes here. To the 00:42:45.039 --> 00:42:48.400 north, there's some multifamily development. The church 00:42:48.400 --> 00:42:50.880 property is here. And then along Fort Worth 00:42:50.880 --> 00:42:54.239 Drive, there's some commercial uses, hotel, restaurants, 00:42:54.239 --> 00:42:59.760 some auto body shops. So just to 00:42:59.760 --> 00:43:04.340 sum up, I guess, the requested zoning district, DCN, DCG, 00:43:04.340 --> 00:43:07.280 is consistent with the future land use 00:43:07.280 --> 00:43:11.250 plan. And it will be a logical extension of the DCG that's 00:43:11.250 --> 00:43:13.599 located here along Fort Worth Drive. 00:43:16.719 --> 00:43:21.039 When we look at public facilities, this is an existing site 00:43:21.039 --> 00:43:23.199 . So it's adequately served with 00:43:23.199 --> 00:43:27.760 water and wastewater. There's extensions of lines available 00:43:27.760 --> 00:43:30.159 on Bernard Street and then Lindsay. 00:43:31.199 --> 00:43:34.000 And then the site would still have access to Bernard, 00:43:34.000 --> 00:43:37.519 Lindsay, and the I-35 East Runners Road 00:43:37.519 --> 00:43:41.510 for transportation. So in accordance with the local 00:43:41.510 --> 00:43:45.840 government code, we issued, or we sent out 11 00:43:45.840 --> 00:43:49.809 notices to properties within 200 feet of the subject 00:43:49.809 --> 00:43:52.079 property. And then we haven't received 00:43:52.079 --> 00:43:56.050 any responses back. And then we sent 68 notices to the 00:43:56.050 --> 00:43:58.880 properties within 500 feet. And the applicant 00:43:58.880 --> 00:44:02.119 opted not to do the neighborhood meeting. And I did follow 00:44:02.119 --> 00:44:03.920 up with him. He hasn't received any 00:44:03.920 --> 00:44:09.130 responses. And so that, well, almost. In summary, DCG is 00:44:09.130 --> 00:44:12.480 consistent with the future land use plan 00:44:12.480 --> 00:44:15.110 and is compatible with the surrounding properties. And 00:44:15.110 --> 00:44:16.960 therefore, we recommend approval. 00:44:20.480 --> 00:44:26.320 Any questions? Great job. No questions. Thank you. 00:44:27.679 --> 00:44:30.469 This is a public hearing. Anyone who would like to speak on 00:44:30.469 --> 00:44:31.199 this item, 00:44:31.199 --> 00:44:34.429 please come forward at this time. And I do have one card, 00:44:34.429 --> 00:44:38.000 Rick Bariam, in support. 00:44:42.079 --> 00:44:45.139 Thank you. I'm the applicant. And I do have a five slide 00:44:45.139 --> 00:44:46.159 presentation. 00:44:47.360 --> 00:44:52.519 If I can find it. Let's see. Escape. All right. And then, 00:44:52.519 --> 00:44:55.199 let's see. Close this one. 00:44:57.840 --> 00:44:59.909 Oh, there it is. Right there. Okay. They were nice enough 00:44:59.909 --> 00:45:01.920 to provide that for me. 00:45:04.320 --> 00:45:09.690 I think it's, ah, there we go. Well, naturally, we know why 00:45:09.690 --> 00:45:11.679 we're here. I just put that as a 00:45:11.679 --> 00:45:14.860 formality. But I want to thank staff for the work they did. 00:45:14.860 --> 00:45:16.559 That was a really nice report. 00:45:16.559 --> 00:45:19.119 And I definitely like the conclusion. Hope you do too. 00:45:22.159 --> 00:45:27.030 In the Highway 35 expansion, most of us benefited. You know 00:45:27.030 --> 00:45:28.960 , more lanes, we can go faster. And we 00:45:28.960 --> 00:45:31.150 were real happy about that. And it didn't really cost us 00:45:31.150 --> 00:45:35.199 much, we figure. But some people sacrificed 00:45:35.199 --> 00:45:38.489 quite a bit more than others. And even if you make a 00:45:38.489 --> 00:45:40.880 sacrifice and you are given monetary 00:45:40.880 --> 00:45:44.110 compensation, that doesn't really provide for everything 00:45:44.110 --> 00:45:46.800 that you're now missing. Especially 00:45:48.880 --> 00:45:52.849 if you lost two buildings. Churches need more than just a 00:45:52.849 --> 00:45:55.280 sanctuary. All the programs that they have, 00:45:55.280 --> 00:45:57.539 it's hard to have a volleyball game if you don't have a 00:45:57.539 --> 00:45:59.039 volleyball court. Or if you 00:45:59.039 --> 00:46:01.780 want to give a seminar on financial planning or something 00:46:01.780 --> 00:46:04.719 like that. It's difficult to do that. 00:46:06.880 --> 00:46:10.079 This is a little graphic that I put together. The bright 00:46:10.079 --> 00:46:13.519 pink line, of course, shows the extent of 00:46:13.519 --> 00:46:15.920 the text dot taking and the buildings with the stripes. 00:46:15.920 --> 00:46:17.119 They're no longer there. 00:46:20.000 --> 00:46:23.170 This is, of course, the zoning. That's what was there. And 00:46:23.170 --> 00:46:24.880 you can see that the one little 00:46:24.880 --> 00:46:28.849 DR1 is kind of small. If you were wanting to develop the 00:46:28.849 --> 00:46:30.480 property, you would have to go 00:46:30.480 --> 00:46:34.559 through this. And some people who might look at it would 00:46:34.559 --> 00:46:36.960 prefer not to. So we're asking 00:46:39.119 --> 00:46:44.820 for an all green. All green for DCG. And basically this is 00:46:44.820 --> 00:46:47.280 all about better possibilities. 00:46:47.280 --> 00:46:50.070 Better possibilities for the church in the future. And 00:46:50.070 --> 00:46:53.599 definitely better possibilities for the city 00:46:53.599 --> 00:46:57.320 because it could become a productive use if it was sold and 00:46:57.320 --> 00:46:59.440 the church moved elsewhere. 00:46:59.440 --> 00:47:02.840 So please vote for approval. And I guess that's all I want 00:47:02.840 --> 00:47:04.480 to say unless you have questions, 00:47:04.480 --> 00:47:09.849 which I don't stand for. >> We're going to go light on you. 00:47:09.849 --> 00:47:10.320 No questions. 00:47:10.320 --> 00:47:12.400 >> Okay. Thank you. >> Thank you, Rick. 00:47:14.159 --> 00:47:16.960 This is a public hearing. Anyone who would like to speak on 00:47:16.960 --> 00:47:17.840 this item, 00:47:17.840 --> 00:47:24.579 you're welcome to come down at this time. Okay. Seeing no 00:47:24.579 --> 00:47:26.320 one else, we will close the 00:47:26.320 --> 00:47:28.289 public hearing and open the floor for discussion or a 00:47:28.289 --> 00:47:29.679 motion. Commissioner Smith. 00:47:29.679 --> 00:47:34.639 >> Thank you, Chair. I didn't know that building was lost. 00:47:34.639 --> 00:47:38.000 I was an Eagle Scout for a true 366 00:47:38.000 --> 00:47:41.969 that met in there for all those years. So that's sad. That 00:47:41.969 --> 00:47:43.840 top floor room had a lot of memories 00:47:43.840 --> 00:47:45.730 for me. So I'm really sorry to hear it but I'm looking 00:47:45.730 --> 00:47:47.199 forward to seeing what you guys can do 00:47:47.199 --> 00:47:50.369 out there at the DBT. So a motion for approval. >> 00:47:50.369 --> 00:47:51.840 Commissioner Beck. 00:47:53.440 --> 00:47:57.010 >> Yeah, I want to echo Commissioner Smith's feelings too 00:47:57.010 --> 00:47:58.880 and thank you for your sacrifice. 00:47:58.880 --> 00:48:02.880 So I second his motion. >> Okay. We have a first and second 00:48:02.880 --> 00:48:03.119 for 00:48:03.119 --> 00:48:07.949 approval. Any further discussion? Seeing none, we'll call 00:48:07.949 --> 00:48:09.440 for a vote on the board. 00:48:17.039 --> 00:48:18.800 Motion is going to carry 5 to 0. 00:48:22.800 --> 00:48:24.639 You're welcome. Congratulations and good luck. 00:48:28.880 --> 00:48:32.000 That will move us on to our project matrix this evening. 00:48:38.639 --> 00:48:40.639 No request? >> I have one. 00:48:40.639 --> 00:48:44.050 >> Commissioner Sanchez. >> I was wondering, one of the 00:48:44.050 --> 00:48:44.239 things 00:48:44.239 --> 00:48:47.750 that concerns me is when we look at these glimmering flats 00:48:47.750 --> 00:48:51.679 and final flats, I always see this kind of 00:48:53.360 --> 00:48:58.329 building. Is there any way of having a discussion on that 00:48:58.329 --> 00:49:02.639 kind of thing as opposed to what we had 00:49:02.639 --> 00:49:08.349 in the past on the streets of both north, south, east, west 00:49:08.349 --> 00:49:11.280 ? It seems like we're losing 00:49:13.039 --> 00:49:14.739 a lot of alternatives to get from one side of town to the 00:49:14.739 --> 00:49:17.599 other. I mean, I lived on the north side 00:49:17.599 --> 00:49:21.570 of town and I had a discussion with a person the other day 00:49:21.570 --> 00:49:23.519 about the way they're building 00:49:24.079 --> 00:49:29.150 these new subdivisions. And I believe that we used to be 00:49:29.150 --> 00:49:31.840 able to cut through a neighborhood 00:49:31.840 --> 00:49:34.639 and get to the other side. Now you can't cut through these 00:49:34.639 --> 00:49:36.719 neighborhoods. So it puts all the 00:49:36.719 --> 00:49:40.690 traffic onto these main arterials. And long term, I think 00:49:40.690 --> 00:49:42.880 if we continue doing that, we're going to 00:49:42.880 --> 00:49:47.039 see a lot more traffic problems. We need to visit that and 00:49:47.039 --> 00:49:49.679 see is that the best way to continue 00:49:49.679 --> 00:49:53.260 developing our neighborhoods. And so I'd like to see us 00:49:53.260 --> 00:49:55.119 have a discussion on that. 00:49:55.119 --> 00:50:03.869 >> Okay. Got it down. Any other items to add to the project 00:50:03.869 --> 00:50:06.159 matrix? Any updates? 00:50:06.159 --> 00:50:11.539 >> We have the meetings coming up next week on the DDC. I 00:50:11.539 --> 00:50:14.320 think everyone got the notification. So 00:50:14.320 --> 00:50:18.710 we're getting ready to get the full gear here for the next 00:50:18.710 --> 00:50:22.559 month or so. >> Okay. We'll prepare. 00:50:23.920 --> 00:50:27.250 >> All right. With that, I will close our meeting this 00:50:27.250 --> 00:50:29.920 evening at 7.08. Thank you, everyone. 00:50:36.159 --> 00:50:38.159 [ Applause ]