WEBVTT 00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:05.000 for April 26th. This meeting has been duly posted and we do 00:00:05.000 --> 00:00:05.639 have a quorum 00:00:05.639 --> 00:00:09.960 present and I will call us to order at 535 and I will turn 00:00:09.960 --> 00:00:11.199 our meeting over to 00:00:11.199 --> 00:00:17.600 Shandrin for work session clarification. Thank you Chair. 00:00:17.600 --> 00:00:19.320 Before we get started I 00:00:19.320 --> 00:00:22.769 wanted to take this opportunity to introduce a new employee 00:00:22.769 --> 00:00:24.399 . We have Robert 00:00:24.399 --> 00:00:28.719 Bob Mikowski who is serving as our new planning supervisor 00:00:28.719 --> 00:00:30.239 in the development 00:00:30.239 --> 00:00:37.740 review section of planning. Bob is a civil cultureist and 00:00:37.740 --> 00:00:39.799 he comes to us with 00:00:39.799 --> 00:00:43.869 experience from the US Forest Service and the Florida 00:00:43.869 --> 00:00:44.600 Forest Service. 00:00:44.600 --> 00:00:48.659 So Bob if you want to come and introduce yourself and tell 00:00:48.659 --> 00:00:49.320 us a little bit about 00:00:49.320 --> 00:01:01.750 yourself. Well Shandrin mentioned I'm Bob Mikowski and I 00:01:01.750 --> 00:01:03.079 retired from the US Forest 00:01:03.079 --> 00:01:06.579 Service after 32 and a half years of federal service and 00:01:06.579 --> 00:01:07.560 some of that was 00:01:07.560 --> 00:01:10.329 with military installations. I was stationed at Eglin Air 00:01:10.329 --> 00:01:11.680 Force Base as a civilian. 00:01:11.680 --> 00:01:15.340 Moody Air Force Base in Valdosta, Fort Knox, Kentucky. 00:01:15.340 --> 00:01:16.879 Working as chief of plans 00:01:16.879 --> 00:01:21.390 programs and analysis, environmental analysis. Also worked 00:01:21.390 --> 00:01:22.599 as a forester on 00:01:22.599 --> 00:01:26.370 those bases, natural and cultural resource manager and most 00:01:26.370 --> 00:01:27.319 recently with 00:01:27.319 --> 00:01:29.439 the federal government I was a regional civil cultureist 00:01:29.439 --> 00:01:30.519 out Atlanta, handled the 00:01:30.519 --> 00:01:34.230 national forest from Virginia to Texas. Retired down to 00:01:34.230 --> 00:01:36.159 Florida. Two weeks later 00:01:36.159 --> 00:01:38.930 I was working for this Florida Forest Service as the county 00:01:38.930 --> 00:01:39.680 forester for Polk 00:01:39.680 --> 00:01:42.739 Hillsborough and Pinellas counties. Well my daughter who 00:01:42.739 --> 00:01:43.719 lives in Savannah 00:01:43.719 --> 00:01:46.489 recently had her second grandchild and was pulling at us to 00:01:46.489 --> 00:01:47.439 come out this way. I 00:01:47.439 --> 00:01:50.209 said only if I can find work. I'm not gonna come out there 00:01:50.209 --> 00:01:51.519 and babysit 24/7 00:01:51.519 --> 00:01:54.840 but Nana wanted out here so I look for gainful employment 00:01:54.840 --> 00:01:56.000 and was fortunate 00:01:56.000 --> 00:02:00.049 enough to land in the city here so I look forward to 00:02:00.049 --> 00:02:01.280 working with y'all. Thank 00:02:01.280 --> 00:02:05.230 you. So now I only have one job instead of two so I'm very 00:02:05.230 --> 00:02:06.799 excited that Bob is on board. 00:02:06.799 --> 00:02:15.099 He's helping me with the planners. He'll be supervising Hay 00:02:15.099 --> 00:02:16.060 wood as well as the 00:02:16.060 --> 00:02:19.879 planners, the case managers that come through the planning 00:02:19.879 --> 00:02:20.840 commission so 00:02:20.840 --> 00:02:27.000 he'll be helping me out. One more thing before we get into 00:02:27.000 --> 00:02:29.000 the cases the 00:02:29.000 --> 00:02:33.319 Clarion group is working full steam ahead on the DDC 00:02:33.319 --> 00:02:34.699 rewrite and we are 00:02:34.699 --> 00:02:38.830 planning to do a public kickoff meeting in June. At that 00:02:38.830 --> 00:02:40.259 same time I wanted to 00:02:40.259 --> 00:02:43.569 convene the PNZ subcommittee for the DDC rewrite so I 00:02:43.569 --> 00:02:45.159 wanted to see if that first 00:02:45.159 --> 00:02:49.699 week of June is workable or doable for the group. I'm 00:02:49.699 --> 00:02:52.919 thinking June 6th, 5th or 6th. 00:02:52.919 --> 00:03:00.659 Can you remind us of the members? I know I know I am. Okay. 00:03:00.659 --> 00:03:01.680 That's what I thought. 00:03:01.680 --> 00:03:10.819 Ellis, it's either a Tuesday or a Wednesday. Did you say 00:03:10.819 --> 00:03:11.599 what time you 00:03:11.599 --> 00:03:15.110 were wanting to meet? Would it be work hours or after hours 00:03:15.110 --> 00:03:19.000 ? Whatever you prefer 00:03:19.000 --> 00:03:22.560 they'll be in town for those two days so I'm trying to... 00:03:22.560 --> 00:03:26.240 May 2nd or 3rd? It's going to be the 00:03:26.240 --> 00:03:29.909 week of June 5th so probably the 6th is the day that I'm 00:03:29.909 --> 00:03:31.280 shooting for during the 00:03:31.280 --> 00:03:39.849 day if we can. City Council is the 5th? Of course it 00:03:39.849 --> 00:03:44.919 affects you Commissioner. 00:03:44.919 --> 00:03:51.189 I'm available that week during the week or after. Okay. 00:03:51.189 --> 00:03:53.919 Everybody good? Okay. 00:03:53.919 --> 00:03:59.539 So we'll get that scheduled. Moving to the agenda, does 00:03:59.539 --> 00:04:01.840 anybody have any discussion 00:04:01.840 --> 00:04:06.439 on the minutes for March 2nd or April 12th? 00:04:07.000 --> 00:04:10.449 Commissioner Ellis. Thank you Chair. I do have a question 00:04:10.449 --> 00:04:11.759 and I don't know if we 00:04:11.759 --> 00:04:15.060 can confirm it since Commissioner Hugsmith isn't here but 00:04:15.060 --> 00:04:16.519 it's line 35 on 00:04:16.519 --> 00:04:22.430 page 5 March 22nd minutes. I'm pretty sure that that line 00:04:22.430 --> 00:04:24.759 is not correct since 00:04:24.759 --> 00:04:30.000 he made the motion to approve it. And so I don't know if 00:04:30.000 --> 00:04:32.480 his name is... it's 00:04:32.480 --> 00:04:35.250 supposed to be a different Commissioner who said that or if 00:04:35.250 --> 00:04:36.079 it's just written 00:04:36.079 --> 00:04:39.720 wrong so that was my question. 00:04:40.680 --> 00:04:44.829 Okay we'll make that note. Yeah but I mean in there it says 00:04:44.829 --> 00:04:45.839 he does not agree with the 00:04:45.839 --> 00:04:48.610 rezone except he motioned to approve it so there's 00:04:48.610 --> 00:04:50.079 something about that line 00:04:50.079 --> 00:04:53.050 that's not right. Okay. So I just wanted to bring that up. 00:04:53.050 --> 00:04:56.160 So do we want to not 00:04:56.160 --> 00:04:58.899 vote on that this evening and get that cleaned up since he 00:04:58.899 --> 00:04:59.680 's not here or how do 00:04:59.680 --> 00:05:02.790 we want to proceed on that? We'll see if he's here for the 00:05:02.790 --> 00:05:06.160 regular session. Okay. All right. Was that it for the 00:05:06.160 --> 00:05:09.240 minutes? Okay. On the 00:05:09.240 --> 00:05:13.149 considered agenda we have two plots a prelim for Harvest 00:05:13.149 --> 00:05:14.399 Hill and an 00:05:14.399 --> 00:05:19.589 associated final plot and if there's any questions we can 00:05:19.589 --> 00:05:20.879 answer those. 00:05:20.879 --> 00:05:26.250 Commissioner Beck. Thank you Chair. Kingsrow is currently a 00:05:26.250 --> 00:05:27.519 2-8 collector 00:05:27.519 --> 00:05:32.569 street and I didn't see any plans on the mobility plan to 00:05:32.569 --> 00:05:34.800 expand that so there 00:05:34.800 --> 00:05:37.819 appears to be only one means of ingress and egress into 00:05:37.819 --> 00:05:39.000 this new development 00:05:39.000 --> 00:05:43.519 loop 288. Has the traffic impact analysis been done to see 00:05:43.519 --> 00:05:45.839 if Kingsrow is gonna be 00:05:45.839 --> 00:05:55.699 able to handle this and Kingsrow yeah Kingsrow gonna be 00:05:55.699 --> 00:05:56.480 able to handle this as 00:05:56.480 --> 00:06:00.720 it is now. Did we look at that? 00:06:09.000 --> 00:06:15.930 I believe Poinsettia is gonna go out onto the loop and that 00:06:15.930 --> 00:06:18.680 's our single means of 00:06:18.680 --> 00:06:23.810 ingress and egress into the new development. Is that 00:06:23.810 --> 00:06:23.959 correct? 00:06:25.319 --> 00:06:28.569 Roll us over engineering. Yeah as part of this development 00:06:28.569 --> 00:06:29.839 they are extending 00:06:29.839 --> 00:06:34.329 Poinsettia to a future loop 288 collector road. There are 00:06:34.329 --> 00:06:35.040 no plans to 00:06:35.040 --> 00:06:37.810 construct that road at this time since that's the only 00:06:37.810 --> 00:06:38.959 portion that's being 00:06:38.959 --> 00:06:43.360 dedicated along this stretch. Will it be done in 00:06:43.360 --> 00:06:44.800 conjunction with the development? 00:06:44.800 --> 00:06:48.689 Right as future development occurs along the loop 288 furn 00:06:48.689 --> 00:06:49.959 ished then we'll acquire 00:06:49.959 --> 00:06:52.930 additional right-of-way. You say collector road or is that 00:06:52.930 --> 00:06:53.959 gonna be a service road? 00:06:53.959 --> 00:06:59.160 Same. Okay yeah it's the same term I'm sorry. It will serve 00:06:59.160 --> 00:07:00.120 as a service road 00:07:00.120 --> 00:07:05.639 to the loop 288 in the future and as soon as we have a 00:07:05.639 --> 00:07:06.600 significant amount of 00:07:06.600 --> 00:07:09.370 right-of-way as development occurs along the loop and we'll 00:07:09.370 --> 00:07:10.439 probably plan a 00:07:10.439 --> 00:07:13.339 that'd be a good time to plan a CIP project to build that 00:07:13.339 --> 00:07:14.360 service road to 00:07:14.360 --> 00:07:17.329 provide that. Another question on this. Is the developer 00:07:17.329 --> 00:07:18.480 responsible for the 00:07:18.480 --> 00:07:22.540 construction of that new service road? No they were just 00:07:22.540 --> 00:07:23.399 going to dedicate the 00:07:23.399 --> 00:07:27.480 right-of-way at this time. Okay so that loop 288 is text- 00:07:27.480 --> 00:07:28.319 out I believe right? 00:07:28.319 --> 00:07:32.720 Loop 280 is text-out but the back of the service road will 00:07:32.720 --> 00:07:33.519 be City of Denton. 00:07:33.519 --> 00:07:39.430 Oh it will be okay. So it's purely our nickel. Okay. And 00:07:39.430 --> 00:07:41.800 there are plans to expand King's 00:07:41.800 --> 00:07:44.839 Row along their frontage. It is a partially improved road. 00:07:44.839 --> 00:07:45.240 They're just 00:07:45.240 --> 00:07:48.879 going to expand it to make it a full width roadway. Okay 00:07:48.879 --> 00:07:51.519 good. Okay that's all I had on the road. 00:07:51.519 --> 00:07:56.759 I noticed this may go back to Haley. Lot 6 which is along 00:07:56.759 --> 00:07:59.079 loop 288 up there on I 00:07:59.079 --> 00:08:03.399 guess it would be the Northeast end. It's intended to be 00:08:03.399 --> 00:08:04.800 the drainage and 00:08:04.800 --> 00:08:08.500 detention Eastman area which is going to be maintained by 00:08:08.500 --> 00:08:11.279 the HOA. Any idea what 00:08:11.279 --> 00:08:13.389 this is going to look like? Is this going to be maybe a 00:08:13.389 --> 00:08:14.560 green space or something 00:08:14.560 --> 00:08:18.680 like that or just curious? I'm not specifically familiar 00:08:18.680 --> 00:08:19.519 with those plans. 00:08:19.519 --> 00:08:23.040 I would imagine the way it's worded is a common area a lot 00:08:23.040 --> 00:08:23.959 that it would be some 00:08:23.959 --> 00:08:26.079 sort of green space maintained by the HOA but I'm not sure 00:08:26.079 --> 00:08:27.079 if there's specific 00:08:27.079 --> 00:08:33.559 plans for that. Okay thank you. Commissioner Ells. Thank 00:08:33.559 --> 00:08:34.480 you chair. 00:08:34.480 --> 00:08:38.360 I just had a question on the note number seven note where 00:08:38.360 --> 00:08:39.879 it said prior to final 00:08:39.879 --> 00:08:47.500 plat the flood study would be conducted. Do you know if 00:08:47.500 --> 00:08:49.879 that was done? 00:09:04.879 --> 00:09:10.039 Zoom into that note real quick. A drainage flood study was 00:09:10.039 --> 00:09:10.639 performed as 00:09:10.639 --> 00:09:14.700 part of this final plot before we would consider approving 00:09:14.700 --> 00:09:18.440 this plot. It looks 00:09:18.440 --> 00:09:20.830 like this note just needs to be removed from the plot and 00:09:20.830 --> 00:09:21.679 we'll make sure it 00:09:21.679 --> 00:09:28.840 gets removed before we file the plot. Okay thank you. 00:09:32.120 --> 00:09:36.940 Were there any more questions about Harvest Hill? Okay for 00:09:36.940 --> 00:09:38.279 our public hearing 00:09:38.279 --> 00:09:41.820 items we have an SUP request for the Denton Bible Church 00:09:41.820 --> 00:09:43.240 and I'll invite 00:09:43.240 --> 00:09:46.120 Haley Zagoski. 00:09:51.639 --> 00:09:57.720 All right good evening. So this is S-17-2 for Denton Calv 00:09:57.720 --> 00:10:00.240 ary Academy and the 00:10:00.240 --> 00:10:03.240 request is to hold a public hearing and consider a request 00:10:03.240 --> 00:10:04.120 by Denton Bible 00:10:04.120 --> 00:10:07.840 Church for a specific use permit to allow for a high school 00:10:07.840 --> 00:10:08.320 use on 00:10:08.320 --> 00:10:12.559 approximately 13.7 acres. As you can see here outlined in 00:10:12.559 --> 00:10:13.519 yellow the property is 00:10:13.519 --> 00:10:16.379 located at the southwest corner of the University Drive Not 00:10:16.379 --> 00:10:17.120 tingham Drive 00:10:17.120 --> 00:10:21.970 intersection. As I mentioned the site's just a little over 00:10:21.970 --> 00:10:22.960 13 and a half acres. 00:10:22.960 --> 00:10:28.500 It has frontage on University Nottingham and Mingo Road and 00:10:28.500 --> 00:10:29.940 the site plan was 00:10:29.940 --> 00:10:32.419 provided in your backup but just to walk you through what's 00:10:32.419 --> 00:10:33.559 going on here. This is 00:10:33.559 --> 00:10:37.740 a fully developed site consisting of four lots and in 1999 00:10:37.740 --> 00:10:38.799 an ordinance was 00:10:38.799 --> 00:10:42.980 approved or SUP was approved that allowed for Denton Calv 00:10:42.980 --> 00:10:43.759 ary Academy to 00:10:43.759 --> 00:10:47.820 develop on the in the four buildings shown in green and 00:10:47.820 --> 00:10:49.519 that's lot one R of 00:10:49.519 --> 00:10:51.909 the development and Denton Calvary Academy is a private 00:10:51.909 --> 00:10:52.519 school that serves 00:10:52.519 --> 00:10:56.049 elementary through high school. In the NRMU zoning district 00:10:56.049 --> 00:10:56.919 elementary and 00:10:56.919 --> 00:10:59.429 middle school are permitted by right. The high school use 00:10:59.429 --> 00:11:00.600 requires an SUP so 00:11:00.600 --> 00:11:02.720 that's why at that time they sought that just for the high 00:11:02.720 --> 00:11:03.679 school portion of 00:11:03.679 --> 00:11:07.419 their activity. The proposal now is they would they're int 00:11:07.419 --> 00:11:08.919 ending to purchase the 00:11:08.919 --> 00:11:12.009 remainder of the property from Denton Bible Church and they 00:11:12.009 --> 00:11:13.240 would then like to 00:11:13.240 --> 00:11:16.039 extend the use elementary through high school to the 00:11:16.039 --> 00:11:17.519 remainder of the property 00:11:17.519 --> 00:11:20.679 to all of these buildings that are outlined here in yellow. 00:11:20.679 --> 00:11:21.720 So the request 00:11:21.720 --> 00:11:23.690 is specifically for the high school but it would encompass 00:11:23.690 --> 00:11:24.360 the entire school 00:11:24.360 --> 00:11:28.019 with all grades. At this time they're proposing to make no 00:11:28.019 --> 00:11:28.679 changes to 00:11:28.679 --> 00:11:31.840 everything that's existing on the site so parking landsca 00:11:31.840 --> 00:11:33.039 ping and the exterior 00:11:33.039 --> 00:11:36.320 buildings and the footprints of those buildings would all 00:11:36.320 --> 00:11:38.940 stay the same. So to 00:11:38.940 --> 00:11:41.399 give you an idea of what's going on in the area if we look 00:11:41.399 --> 00:11:42.159 at the immediately 00:11:42.159 --> 00:11:45.690 adjoining properties you see the subject property is zoned 00:11:45.690 --> 00:11:47.000 NRMU so neighborhood 00:11:47.000 --> 00:11:49.779 residential mixed use and what we have there currently is 00:11:49.779 --> 00:11:50.799 the four buildings 00:11:50.799 --> 00:11:53.769 where Denton Calvary Academy operates and then on the other 00:11:53.769 --> 00:11:54.519 three lots are 00:11:54.519 --> 00:11:56.639 buildings that are owned and operated by Denton Bible 00:11:56.639 --> 00:11:58.639 Church at this time. Across 00:11:58.639 --> 00:12:02.820 Nottingham Drive in a CMG district we have the main campus 00:12:02.820 --> 00:12:04.039 for Denton Bible 00:12:04.039 --> 00:12:07.259 Church and then on the other sides of the property north 00:12:07.259 --> 00:12:08.840 and west we have NR3 00:12:08.840 --> 00:12:11.129 district and those are currently developed with single- 00:12:11.129 --> 00:12:11.480 family 00:12:11.480 --> 00:12:18.000 neighborhoods. Looking a little bit further out you can see 00:12:18.000 --> 00:12:18.799 the CMG district 00:12:18.799 --> 00:12:21.289 extends across University we get some more retail and 00:12:21.289 --> 00:12:22.399 restaurant uses at that 00:12:22.399 --> 00:12:25.700 time. On the south side of Mingo Road we have more of the 00:12:25.700 --> 00:12:26.840 NRMU district there's 00:12:26.840 --> 00:12:29.870 the railroad tracks immediately south of Mingo and then 00:12:29.870 --> 00:12:31.200 multifamily uses beyond 00:12:31.200 --> 00:12:35.259 that and then you can see to the north and west more NR3 00:12:35.259 --> 00:12:36.279 with single-family 00:12:36.279 --> 00:12:40.899 development. And just to give you a broader picture of what 00:12:40.899 --> 00:12:41.759 's in this area 00:12:41.759 --> 00:12:44.730 you can see it's a very broad mix of residential and 00:12:44.730 --> 00:12:45.639 commercial and 00:12:45.639 --> 00:12:48.919 institutional uses encompassing several zoning districts. 00:12:48.919 --> 00:12:49.840 We do have a couple of 00:12:49.840 --> 00:12:54.460 city parks in the area as well. The future land use for 00:12:54.460 --> 00:12:55.759 this area is community 00:12:55.759 --> 00:12:58.919 mixed use so this designation is intended to promote a 00:12:58.919 --> 00:12:59.879 mixture of uses 00:12:59.879 --> 00:13:03.129 predominantly commercial with supporting residential and 00:13:03.129 --> 00:13:04.879 service uses. It's 00:13:04.879 --> 00:13:07.360 intended to promote connectivity and multimodal 00:13:07.360 --> 00:13:08.440 transportation in an area as 00:13:08.440 --> 00:13:11.679 well as promoting both vertical and horizontal mixtures of 00:13:11.679 --> 00:13:12.879 uses and 00:13:12.879 --> 00:13:15.649 schools, places of worship and parks are all permitted by 00:13:15.649 --> 00:13:19.519 right. So the use is the 00:13:19.519 --> 00:13:22.000 use that they're proposing for the property does support 00:13:22.000 --> 00:13:22.600 areas supported 00:13:22.600 --> 00:13:27.470 by this future land use designation. To give you an idea of 00:13:27.470 --> 00:13:28.759 the mobility in this 00:13:28.759 --> 00:13:32.330 area University Drive is a primary arterial. Nottingham 00:13:32.330 --> 00:13:33.399 which runs along 00:13:33.399 --> 00:13:35.899 the eastern border of the property is a collector street 00:13:35.899 --> 00:13:36.879 and the Mingo Road is a 00:13:36.879 --> 00:13:40.940 secondary arterial. There's also existing or proposed bike 00:13:40.940 --> 00:13:41.759 routes along all of 00:13:41.759 --> 00:13:44.580 those roads as well as Denton County Transit Authority bus 00:13:44.580 --> 00:13:45.320 routes that run 00:13:45.320 --> 00:13:49.039 through this area. So many means of access and 00:13:49.039 --> 00:13:51.399 transportation to this site. 00:13:51.399 --> 00:13:55.169 Just to look a little more specifically at the site it does 00:13:55.169 --> 00:13:56.279 have two entrances 00:13:56.279 --> 00:13:59.049 along University that serve the current school campus. 00:13:59.049 --> 00:14:00.519 Three drives currently 00:14:00.519 --> 00:14:03.289 exist on Nottingham Road and then the portion of the 00:14:03.289 --> 00:14:04.159 property that adjoins 00:14:04.159 --> 00:14:08.090 Mingo currently doesn't have anything developed on it. At 00:14:08.090 --> 00:14:09.639 the time of the 00:14:09.639 --> 00:14:12.950 original adoption of the SUP for the current campus just on 00:14:12.950 --> 00:14:13.879 that northern 00:14:13.879 --> 00:14:16.990 portion it was determined that the landscaping existing on 00:14:16.990 --> 00:14:17.480 site was 00:14:17.480 --> 00:14:20.559 sufficient to provide compatibility between the school and 00:14:20.559 --> 00:14:20.840 that 00:14:20.840 --> 00:14:23.610 neighborhood are joining to the south. And as you can see 00:14:23.610 --> 00:14:24.200 here there is a 00:14:24.200 --> 00:14:27.240 substantial amount of landscaping on site and it does 00:14:27.240 --> 00:14:28.399 exceed the minimum 00:14:28.399 --> 00:14:33.220 requirement for the NRMU district on all lots. Just some 00:14:33.220 --> 00:14:34.480 site photos to give you 00:14:34.480 --> 00:14:36.990 an idea if you're not familiar with the campus. This is 00:14:36.990 --> 00:14:37.960 looking towards the west 00:14:37.960 --> 00:14:43.409 at one of the existing school buildings. You can see here 00:14:43.409 --> 00:14:43.879 this there's these are 00:14:43.879 --> 00:14:45.840 some of the buildings on the eastern side of the property 00:14:45.840 --> 00:14:46.639 along Nottingham 00:14:46.639 --> 00:14:50.960 Drive and then these are the southernmost buildings and you 00:14:50.960 --> 00:14:51.240 can see 00:14:51.240 --> 00:14:54.320 here the substantial amount of well-established trees that 00:14:54.320 --> 00:14:54.879 are in the 00:14:54.879 --> 00:14:58.059 parking lot as well as back there along back here in the 00:14:58.059 --> 00:14:59.440 back that would be the 00:14:59.440 --> 00:15:01.549 western border. So you can see there's a substantial amount 00:15:01.549 --> 00:15:02.279 of landscaping as 00:15:02.279 --> 00:15:05.080 well as fencing that runs between this and the neighborhood 00:15:05.080 --> 00:15:06.519 . And just to give 00:15:06.519 --> 00:15:09.970 you an idea there's also hedgerows and large established 00:15:09.970 --> 00:15:11.080 trees that screen the 00:15:11.080 --> 00:15:16.029 parking lot on all lots from the existing roadways. Not 00:15:16.029 --> 00:15:17.240 ification was sent 00:15:17.240 --> 00:15:23.029 out about this case. We received two in favor and one in 00:15:23.029 --> 00:15:25.039 opposition and you can 00:15:25.039 --> 00:15:27.870 see here where the two in favor were in the existing 00:15:27.870 --> 00:15:29.360 neighborhood to the south 00:15:29.360 --> 00:15:32.129 and then one in opposition across University Drive there. 00:15:32.129 --> 00:15:35.039 And I believe I 00:15:35.039 --> 00:15:39.990 failed to pass out that opposition to you so I can do that. 00:15:39.990 --> 00:15:41.639 Staff is 00:15:41.639 --> 00:15:44.610 recommending approval for this case based on our analysis 00:15:44.610 --> 00:15:45.720 here. It does meet 00:15:45.720 --> 00:15:48.509 all of the requirements for SUP approval that are outlined 00:15:48.509 --> 00:15:49.759 in subchapter 6 of the 00:15:49.759 --> 00:15:54.120 DDC. Given that the use or yeah the use already exists on a 00:15:54.120 --> 00:15:54.559 portion of the 00:15:54.559 --> 00:15:58.789 property and the site is fully developed at this time and 00:15:58.789 --> 00:16:00.080 it was also found to be 00:16:00.080 --> 00:16:04.509 compatible under that 1999 ordinance we felt that it met 00:16:04.509 --> 00:16:05.840 all those criteria for 00:16:05.840 --> 00:16:09.639 approval. The expansion as I mentioned is onto a fully 00:16:09.639 --> 00:16:10.440 developed site. They're 00:16:10.440 --> 00:16:12.700 intending no changes to the exterior at this time. They 00:16:12.700 --> 00:16:13.600 mentioned doing some 00:16:13.600 --> 00:16:16.370 interior remodel to accommodate classrooms but that would 00:16:16.370 --> 00:16:17.000 be the extent 00:16:17.000 --> 00:16:20.269 of the changes to the site. And the use is also consistent 00:16:20.269 --> 00:16:21.399 with the future land 00:16:21.399 --> 00:16:24.970 use designation under the Denton Plan 2030. So staff is 00:16:24.970 --> 00:16:26.480 recommending approval 00:16:26.480 --> 00:16:30.190 with the following conditions. Condition one being that the 00:16:30.190 --> 00:16:31.120 use be restricted to 00:16:31.120 --> 00:16:33.360 the existing buildings that were shown on the site plan. 00:16:33.360 --> 00:16:35.279 The existing landscaping 00:16:35.279 --> 00:16:37.600 coverage and parking count should be maintained as they're 00:16:37.600 --> 00:16:38.320 shown on the site 00:16:38.320 --> 00:16:41.129 plan. And then any changes that they intend to make to the 00:16:41.129 --> 00:16:42.000 footprint, the 00:16:42.000 --> 00:16:44.970 parking count, the layout and flow of the site, and the 00:16:44.970 --> 00:16:46.320 landscaping should then be 00:16:46.320 --> 00:16:48.429 approved through an amendment to the SUP so that we can 00:16:48.429 --> 00:16:49.000 ensure that 00:16:49.000 --> 00:16:51.970 compatibility with the neighborhood is maintained. We also 00:16:51.970 --> 00:16:53.440 suggest that 00:16:53.440 --> 00:16:57.509 ordinance 99277 be repealed and replaced by this new 00:16:57.509 --> 00:16:58.080 ordinance so that 00:16:58.080 --> 00:17:01.799 there's only one SUP controlling this use on the property. 00:17:01.799 --> 00:17:03.759 And I can answer any 00:17:03.759 --> 00:17:09.680 questions. Commissioner Rozelle. Thank you. So starting 00:17:09.680 --> 00:17:12.240 last first with the 00:17:12.240 --> 00:17:20.079 repeal of ordinance 9927, does this SUP fully contain all 00:17:20.079 --> 00:17:21.039 things on the 00:17:21.039 --> 00:17:25.279 ordinance 99277? Yes, we would recommend appealing that 00:17:25.279 --> 00:17:26.559 ordinance in its entirety. 00:17:26.559 --> 00:17:31.410 But does this SUP cover everything on that ordinance or 00:17:31.410 --> 00:17:32.240 would there be 00:17:32.240 --> 00:17:36.329 changes? So the existing ordinance was provided in your 00:17:36.329 --> 00:17:37.480 backup. It had several 00:17:37.480 --> 00:17:40.250 provisions about the hours of operation, the number of 00:17:40.250 --> 00:17:41.480 students on the campus, and 00:17:41.480 --> 00:17:44.529 we felt given the information that was provided by the 00:17:44.529 --> 00:17:45.839 applicant that those 00:17:45.839 --> 00:17:49.680 were a bit onerous. At full capacity they anticipated they 00:17:49.680 --> 00:17:50.119 could handle 00:17:50.119 --> 00:17:53.640 approximately 1,500 students. Whichever they would ever 00:17:53.640 --> 00:17:54.640 reach that full potential, 00:17:54.640 --> 00:17:58.319 I'm not sure. But the existing ordinance, for example, 00:17:58.319 --> 00:18:00.039 limited them to 500 students 00:18:00.039 --> 00:18:04.089 with no more than 250 being there on any given day. So we 00:18:04.089 --> 00:18:05.799 felt that some of those 00:18:05.799 --> 00:18:08.259 things may not need to be carried forward, but we do want 00:18:08.259 --> 00:18:09.079 to make sure that 00:18:09.079 --> 00:18:11.589 the site conditions as you see on the site plan are not 00:18:11.589 --> 00:18:13.160 changed without further 00:18:13.160 --> 00:18:19.650 amendment and approval of the SUP. Thank you. And then 00:18:19.650 --> 00:18:22.119 another question. 00:18:23.440 --> 00:18:28.559 When, specific to this case, but also in general, when an 00:18:28.559 --> 00:18:31.519 SUP comes forward, does 00:18:31.519 --> 00:18:35.579 the city re-measure all the requirements for the zoning? 00:18:35.579 --> 00:18:36.799 Because this zoning was 00:18:36.799 --> 00:18:40.309 done in 99. Does it meet current parking? Does that get re- 00:18:40.309 --> 00:18:41.400 triggered? And if so, was 00:18:41.400 --> 00:18:45.460 that looked at or do they get grandfathered and even though 00:18:45.460 --> 00:18:46.000 they're 00:18:46.000 --> 00:18:49.519 initiated kind of a re-look at the zoning? In this case, 00:18:49.519 --> 00:18:50.480 since it was all 00:18:50.480 --> 00:18:54.000 existing, we did verify to see it does meet the landscaping 00:18:54.000 --> 00:18:54.559 requirements and 00:18:54.559 --> 00:18:57.329 lot coverage requirements for NRMU. The buildings are 00:18:57.329 --> 00:18:57.960 within the height 00:18:57.960 --> 00:19:00.839 restrictions and all of those components. In terms of 00:19:00.839 --> 00:19:02.720 parking, there are, I believe, 00:19:02.720 --> 00:19:07.039 694 spaces existing. The parking count shown on the SUP was 00:19:07.039 --> 00:19:07.519 based on an 00:19:07.519 --> 00:19:10.740 absolute worst-case scenario if the buildings were ever to 00:19:10.740 --> 00:19:12.400 reach full public 00:19:12.400 --> 00:19:16.789 occupancy that was allowed. And that seems like an unlikely 00:19:16.789 --> 00:19:18.200 scenario given 00:19:18.200 --> 00:19:21.009 that schools are generally calculated based on a classroom 00:19:21.009 --> 00:19:21.799 basis, but not 00:19:21.799 --> 00:19:24.279 knowing how they might remodel, we couldn't determine the 00:19:24.279 --> 00:19:25.000 specific parking 00:19:25.000 --> 00:19:28.059 ratio that would be required. So all of that was looked at 00:19:28.059 --> 00:19:28.880 and staff felt 00:19:28.880 --> 00:19:31.720 comfortable with it meeting the parking demand and 00:19:31.720 --> 00:19:32.279 everything that would be 00:19:32.279 --> 00:19:37.839 required for the site. Okay, thank you. Commissioner Ellis. 00:19:37.839 --> 00:19:39.839 Thank you, Chair. So 00:19:39.839 --> 00:19:43.769 Haley, do we have the new written ordinance? Do we have a 00:19:43.769 --> 00:19:44.759 cop? We don't 00:19:44.759 --> 00:19:48.819 have that? Staff typically prepares that for our City 00:19:48.819 --> 00:19:51.440 Council. Okay, so that's when 00:19:51.440 --> 00:19:54.599 everything will be written? Yes, based on the 00:19:54.599 --> 00:19:55.559 recommendations that you all 00:19:55.559 --> 00:19:58.329 have and anything you might want to change in those 00:19:58.329 --> 00:20:00.920 requirements. Okay, thanks. 00:20:00.920 --> 00:20:06.369 Commissioner Tyler. Thank you, Chair. Regarding condition 00:20:06.369 --> 00:20:08.000 number one, there 00:20:08.000 --> 00:20:12.170 is an undeveloped area on this lot, so obviously the 00:20:12.170 --> 00:20:13.839 proposed use must be 00:20:13.839 --> 00:20:16.319 restricted to existing buildings, but then we get down to 00:20:16.319 --> 00:20:17.160 landscaping coverage 00:20:17.160 --> 00:20:20.759 and parking counts. It seems like if they build anything on 00:20:20.759 --> 00:20:22.079 the mingo and 00:20:22.079 --> 00:20:25.160 they're going to have to put in a parking lot. Yes, sir. 00:20:25.160 --> 00:20:29.200 And so, and since that's not 00:20:29.200 --> 00:20:32.099 part of the proposed use, would it apply? Or is the 00:20:32.099 --> 00:20:34.160 proposed use only, I guess I'm 00:20:34.160 --> 00:20:37.200 trying to tease out if it prevents them from doing anything 00:20:37.200 --> 00:20:37.839 on the 00:20:37.839 --> 00:20:41.519 undeveloped area without coming back and amending the SUP? 00:20:41.519 --> 00:20:43.400 Or if it only 00:20:43.400 --> 00:20:46.690 applies to portions of the lot that are part of the 00:20:46.690 --> 00:20:49.940 proposed use? Certainly. Did you want to answer that, 00:20:49.940 --> 00:20:50.200 Chancellor? 00:20:50.200 --> 00:20:55.039 Sure, I'll go. So if the proposed use, the future use is 00:20:55.039 --> 00:20:56.720 permitted outright in the zoning 00:20:56.720 --> 00:20:59.549 district, doesn't require an SUP, then it goes through our 00:20:59.549 --> 00:21:00.440 normal development 00:21:00.440 --> 00:21:03.779 process. We'll check, we'll do zoning verification, we'll 00:21:03.779 --> 00:21:05.480 check for parking, just 00:21:05.480 --> 00:21:08.630 like we would any other site, and it would not have to be 00:21:08.630 --> 00:21:09.680 approved by City 00:21:09.680 --> 00:21:13.490 Council. But if the new use is another, is extension of the 00:21:13.490 --> 00:21:15.000 high school, then it 00:21:15.000 --> 00:21:17.279 would come back through the SUP process. Does that answer 00:21:17.279 --> 00:21:18.440 your question? Yes, so 00:21:18.440 --> 00:21:22.049 even with a binding site plan, we bind them to a site plan 00:21:22.049 --> 00:21:22.940 that says no, no 00:21:22.940 --> 00:21:25.710 building on the south end, and then they, if they want to 00:21:25.710 --> 00:21:26.839 build it, they can build 00:21:26.839 --> 00:21:31.940 a building on the south end without amending the SUP? The 00:21:31.940 --> 00:21:33.079 limits of 00:21:33.079 --> 00:21:36.720 construction for the SUP include the undeveloped parcel? 00:21:36.720 --> 00:21:38.400 Yes, they show all 00:21:38.400 --> 00:21:41.599 that on the site plan. Okay, so we may need to amend the 00:21:41.599 --> 00:21:42.640 limits of construction 00:21:42.640 --> 00:21:48.759 for the SUP to remove that. That's a good catch. Thank you. 00:21:51.759 --> 00:22:00.559 Any other questions? Thank you. 00:22:09.640 --> 00:22:15.440 The next case is the zoning, the rezoning request for 00:22:15.440 --> 00:22:16.480 property located at 00:22:16.480 --> 00:22:20.650 the corner of Hopson Lane and Country Club Road, and this 00:22:20.650 --> 00:22:22.200 is a continuation of 00:22:22.200 --> 00:22:29.039 the CST case that we heard a month or so ago. So this is 00:22:29.039 --> 00:22:31.079 case Z17-7, again for the 00:22:31.079 --> 00:22:35.599 CST corner store. So the request is to hold a public 00:22:35.599 --> 00:22:36.799 hearing and consider a 00:22:36.799 --> 00:22:40.470 request by the property owners to rezone 0.8 acres from 00:22:40.470 --> 00:22:41.400 neighborhood 00:22:41.400 --> 00:22:44.269 residential mixed use to CMG district, and this portion of 00:22:44.269 --> 00:22:45.119 the property is 00:22:45.119 --> 00:22:48.299 located on the north side of Hopson Lane, about 340 feet 00:22:48.299 --> 00:22:51.359 east of Country Club Road. 00:22:51.440 --> 00:22:54.890 So you may remember a couple of months ago we had the rez 00:22:54.890 --> 00:22:56.079 oning for the property 00:22:56.079 --> 00:22:59.839 that's shown here in pink that was rezoned from NRMU to CMG 00:22:59.839 --> 00:23:00.279 for the 00:23:00.279 --> 00:23:04.700 development of a corner store. At that time that rendered 00:23:04.700 --> 00:23:06.200 this subject property 00:23:06.200 --> 00:23:09.509 an isolated pocket of NRMU zoning, so as a condition of 00:23:09.509 --> 00:23:10.839 that staff had recommended 00:23:10.839 --> 00:23:13.849 that they rezone this, consolidate the zoning on the 00:23:13.849 --> 00:23:15.440 property, because this is 00:23:15.440 --> 00:23:17.930 all one lot and at this current time it has three zoning 00:23:17.930 --> 00:23:20.880 designations across it. 00:23:21.640 --> 00:23:26.140 So again, currently this portion of NRMU is isolated with 00:23:26.140 --> 00:23:27.079 no connectivity to 00:23:27.079 --> 00:23:30.529 other portions of NRMU district. Immediately adjoining we 00:23:30.529 --> 00:23:31.079 have the 00:23:31.079 --> 00:23:34.170 recently rezoned CMG part of the property that's currently 00:23:34.170 --> 00:23:34.920 vacant on the 00:23:34.920 --> 00:23:39.079 south side with a single-family home on the north. To the 00:23:39.079 --> 00:23:39.559 north and 00:23:39.559 --> 00:23:43.640 east we have NR6 district, chiefly vacant there are some 00:23:43.640 --> 00:23:44.359 single-family homes 00:23:44.359 --> 00:23:47.680 developed further north. NR2 district exists to the south 00:23:47.680 --> 00:23:48.720 across Hopson Lane 00:23:48.720 --> 00:23:51.980 with single-family homes, and then a little further to the 00:23:51.980 --> 00:23:52.880 west along Country 00:23:52.880 --> 00:23:56.190 Club there's NRMU district with offices and existing fuel 00:23:56.190 --> 00:23:57.400 ing station and some 00:23:57.400 --> 00:24:01.720 multifamily development. Expanding further out you can see 00:24:01.720 --> 00:24:02.839 this area gets a 00:24:02.839 --> 00:24:05.099 little more complicated. Across Fort Worth Drive there's a 00:24:05.099 --> 00:24:05.559 mixture of 00:24:05.559 --> 00:24:08.640 employment center and industrial zonings with some 00:24:08.640 --> 00:24:10.000 manufactured housing, 00:24:10.000 --> 00:24:14.059 landscape companies, a veterinarian's office, a variety of 00:24:14.059 --> 00:24:15.319 uses over there. 00:24:15.319 --> 00:24:18.440 Again further to the south we maintain the NR2 district 00:24:18.440 --> 00:24:19.960 zoning and then the NR6 00:24:19.960 --> 00:24:25.140 continues to the north and east. Just to give you a broader 00:24:25.140 --> 00:24:27.160 view of the area you 00:24:27.160 --> 00:24:30.450 can see this area has a wide mixture of commercial and 00:24:30.450 --> 00:24:32.000 industrial and residential 00:24:32.000 --> 00:24:37.519 uses going on in it. This entire area along Fort Worth 00:24:37.519 --> 00:24:39.079 Drive at Hopson and 00:24:39.079 --> 00:24:41.849 Country Club is designated by our future land use map as 00:24:41.849 --> 00:24:43.759 community mixed use. So 00:24:43.759 --> 00:24:46.170 like we just mentioned with the last case this is intended 00:24:46.170 --> 00:24:46.799 to promote a 00:24:46.799 --> 00:24:49.579 mixture of uses mainly commercial with service and 00:24:49.579 --> 00:24:50.599 residential uses 00:24:50.599 --> 00:24:53.819 complementing that. Again it's intended to provide 00:24:53.819 --> 00:24:55.319 connectivity, promote 00:24:55.319 --> 00:24:57.809 multimodal transportation, promote that mixture 00:24:57.809 --> 00:24:59.519 horizontally and vertically of 00:24:59.519 --> 00:25:02.710 various uses and some of the typical developments that are 00:25:02.710 --> 00:25:03.680 called out in the 00:25:03.680 --> 00:25:06.799 Denton plan for this area are service stations, shopping, 00:25:06.799 --> 00:25:07.680 supermarkets and 00:25:07.680 --> 00:25:12.680 office uses. If we look at our mobility plan you can see 00:25:12.680 --> 00:25:13.559 Fort Worth Drive is a 00:25:13.559 --> 00:25:16.359 primary arterial. Country Club and Hopson are both 00:25:16.359 --> 00:25:19.079 secondary arterials and in 00:25:19.079 --> 00:25:23.150 this area Hopson Lane is currently a two-lane undivided 00:25:23.150 --> 00:25:24.000 roadway so not yet 00:25:24.000 --> 00:25:28.900 fully developed to those secondary arterial standards in 00:25:28.900 --> 00:25:30.079 this area. And with 00:25:30.079 --> 00:25:33.640 this case we did send out notifications again and we had 00:25:33.640 --> 00:25:34.720 one in opposition and 00:25:34.720 --> 00:25:40.240 one in favor. And staff is recommending approval based on 00:25:40.240 --> 00:25:41.519 this land use analysis 00:25:41.519 --> 00:25:45.680 that CMG is compatible with those surrounding zoning and 00:25:45.680 --> 00:25:47.079 land uses. It 00:25:47.079 --> 00:25:49.190 eliminates that isolated zoning district that was created 00:25:49.190 --> 00:25:50.319 with the last re-zoning 00:25:50.319 --> 00:25:53.829 and CMG is consistent with the future land use designation 00:25:53.829 --> 00:25:54.640 under the Denton 00:25:54.640 --> 00:25:59.920 plan 2030. And I can answer any questions at this time. 00:25:59.920 --> 00:26:01.640 Commissioner Back. Thank you 00:26:01.640 --> 00:26:06.160 Chair. The people making this zoning request are the same 00:26:06.160 --> 00:26:06.880 people that are going to 00:26:06.880 --> 00:26:09.180 build that convenience store, is that correct? Yes sir it's 00:26:09.180 --> 00:26:09.880 the same owner and 00:26:09.880 --> 00:26:13.329 same developer. Seems to me to indicate they have plans on 00:26:13.329 --> 00:26:14.240 building something 00:26:14.240 --> 00:26:18.299 there. This request was triggered primarily by staff's 00:26:18.299 --> 00:26:19.140 concern that we had 00:26:19.140 --> 00:26:22.589 created that isolated pocket of NRMU so that was the reason 00:26:22.589 --> 00:26:23.160 for their 00:26:23.160 --> 00:26:26.019 application. At this time I'm not sure based on their site 00:26:26.019 --> 00:26:27.039 plan whether their 00:26:27.039 --> 00:26:32.960 proposal will extend into this area or not. Okay thank you. 00:26:36.880 --> 00:26:40.759 Thank you Haley. 00:26:44.119 --> 00:26:48.039 And then the final public hearing item which deals with the 00:26:48.039 --> 00:26:49.160 Kruger at Shady 00:26:49.160 --> 00:26:53.500 Shores. The applicant has requested an indefinite post-poll 00:26:53.500 --> 00:26:55.519 ment of this item so 00:26:55.519 --> 00:27:00.019 we won't actually hear this but Jennifer will you go 00:27:00.019 --> 00:27:02.440 through the process for how 00:27:02.440 --> 00:27:06.809 we are going to handle this one? Yeah last time we actually 00:27:06.809 --> 00:27:07.880 kept the public 00:27:07.880 --> 00:27:10.759 hearing open so that it would not have to be republished so 00:27:10.759 --> 00:27:11.480 we're gonna have to 00:27:11.480 --> 00:27:16.119 close that and then we can entertain a motion for postpon 00:27:16.119 --> 00:27:18.720 ement indefinitely and 00:27:18.720 --> 00:27:22.809 then we'll have to repel a shuttle later time. Does 00:27:22.809 --> 00:27:25.240 Commissioner Roselle is there 00:27:25.240 --> 00:27:28.210 an opportunity to give testimony before it closes or is the 00:27:28.210 --> 00:27:29.039 chair just gonna 00:27:29.039 --> 00:27:32.079 simply state it and close it? Do we have to provide 00:27:32.079 --> 00:27:34.000 opportunity for people here to 00:27:34.000 --> 00:27:37.450 speak about it? We do not have to that is at the discretion 00:27:37.450 --> 00:27:39.079 of the chair. Okay I 00:27:39.079 --> 00:27:44.819 think last time we didn't have anybody that came on this 00:27:44.819 --> 00:27:46.599 particular issue. 00:27:46.599 --> 00:27:50.049 We'll look and see if there's people there I think we'll 00:27:50.049 --> 00:27:51.039 take a look see how 00:27:51.039 --> 00:27:56.799 many people show up and see what we need to do at that time 00:27:56.799 --> 00:28:01.400 . Okay with that I will 00:28:01.400 --> 00:28:04.890 close our work session at 6.02 and we'll reconvene in 00:28:04.890 --> 00:28:06.839 council chambers at 6.30. 00:28:06.839 --> 00:28:09.559 Thank you. 00:28:27.119 --> 00:28:27.119 Good evening and welcome to the City of Denton Planning and 00:28:27.119 --> 00:28:31.119 Zoning Commission 00:28:31.119 --> 00:28:36.650 meeting for April the 26th 2017. This meeting has been duly 00:28:36.650 --> 00:28:37.720 posted and we do 00:28:37.720 --> 00:28:42.200 have a quorum present and I will call us into order at 6.34 00:28:42.200 --> 00:28:43.240 . Our first order of 00:28:43.240 --> 00:28:46.849 business will be to stand and give the pledge to the US and 00:28:46.849 --> 00:28:48.160 the Texas flags. 00:29:01.640 --> 00:29:01.640 The Texas flag. I pledge allegiance to the Texas one state 00:29:01.640 --> 00:29:01.640 under God one indivisible. The next item on our agenda this 00:29:01.640 --> 00:29:30.880 evening will be to consider a 00:29:30.880 --> 00:29:33.960 approval of our planning and zoning Commission meeting 00:29:33.960 --> 00:29:35.000 minutes and I will 00:29:35.000 --> 00:29:38.029 take that in two motions because I think we have some 00:29:38.029 --> 00:29:39.640 changes on one of our sets 00:29:39.640 --> 00:29:44.519 so a chair would entertain a motion for March 22nd. 00:29:48.799 --> 00:29:52.680 Commissioner Rizzo. The March 22nd is the one that needs to 00:29:52.680 --> 00:29:53.599 be changed is that 00:29:53.599 --> 00:29:56.480 correct? I think that's correct. So I move approval pending 00:29:56.480 --> 00:29:57.160 the change for 00:29:57.160 --> 00:30:09.279 Commissioner Hutzbeth. You're okay with that? Okay. 00:30:14.960 --> 00:30:17.759 Yeah I move for a motion for approval for the March 22nd 00:30:17.759 --> 00:30:19.960 minutes. With an 00:30:19.960 --> 00:30:23.619 amendment or a change? Right the change with Commissioner H 00:30:23.619 --> 00:30:25.160 utzbeth's remarks. Okay 00:30:25.160 --> 00:30:28.319 thank you. Commissioner Ellis. I'll second. Okay we have a 00:30:28.319 --> 00:30:29.519 first and a second for 00:30:29.519 --> 00:30:33.599 approval with a update on the language for Commissioner H 00:30:33.599 --> 00:30:35.079 utzbeth. All those in 00:30:35.079 --> 00:30:38.559 favor I'll call for a vote on the board. 00:30:55.160 --> 00:31:13.779 Chair's gonna back up a step before we call for a vote we 00:31:13.779 --> 00:31:14.640 're gonna ask for a 00:31:14.640 --> 00:31:19.519 clarification on the motion of what exactly the change is. 00:31:19.519 --> 00:31:21.160 Can I defer to 00:31:21.160 --> 00:31:26.720 City for that explanation? What was wrong with the minutes 00:31:26.720 --> 00:31:27.400 to begin with is on 00:31:27.400 --> 00:31:31.559 page 6 line 37 is that correct? 00:31:38.400 --> 00:31:41.980 So for clarification on line 35 it says Commissioner Hutzb 00:31:41.980 --> 00:31:42.680 eth stated he does not 00:31:42.680 --> 00:31:44.980 agree with the rezone that should be Commissioner Hutzbeth 00:31:44.980 --> 00:31:46.119 stated he does agree 00:31:46.119 --> 00:31:50.000 with the rezone is that correct Commissioner Hutzbeth? 00:31:50.000 --> 00:31:55.759 Commissioner Hutzbeth. 00:31:55.759 --> 00:32:04.400 I'm sorry is that with you? Yes. Bear with me because I 00:32:04.400 --> 00:32:07.079 thought it was 00:32:16.279 --> 00:32:26.140 correct. It's correct. The change is correct. Okay but we 00:32:26.140 --> 00:32:29.839 're keeping it 00:32:29.839 --> 00:32:29.839 doesn't belong in this area? No I thought Commissioner Rose 00:32:29.839 --> 00:32:38.559 lle just changed his 00:32:38.559 --> 00:32:38.559 motion. Striking the last part of that sentence. Thank you. 00:32:38.559 --> 00:32:45.319 We have clear do we 00:32:45.319 --> 00:32:50.839 need to continue this for another meeting or are we good? 00:32:50.839 --> 00:32:53.680 Okay. So we have a 00:32:53.680 --> 00:32:56.759 Commissioner Roselle would you restate your motion and we 00:32:56.759 --> 00:32:57.640 'll see if we can get a 00:32:57.640 --> 00:33:02.880 second on it again. Sure I move for approval for the March 00:33:02.880 --> 00:33:04.319 22nd minutes with 00:33:04.319 --> 00:33:08.890 the change on page 5 line 35 to read Commissioner Hutzbeth 00:33:08.890 --> 00:33:10.000 stated he does 00:33:10.000 --> 00:33:14.160 agree with the rezone and striking the it doesn't belong in 00:33:14.160 --> 00:33:15.599 this area. Great. 00:33:15.599 --> 00:33:19.319 You'd like to second again for Commissioner Beck. 00:33:19.319 --> 00:33:20.400 Commissioner Beck for a 00:33:20.400 --> 00:33:24.519 second this time. I second. All right we have a first and a 00:33:24.519 --> 00:33:26.559 second. Any discussion 00:33:26.559 --> 00:33:30.099 further discussion on this item? Seeing none we'll call for 00:33:30.099 --> 00:33:33.000 a vote on the board. 00:33:40.000 --> 00:33:46.640 Motion carries five with one recuse. Commissioner Taylor. I 00:33:46.640 --> 00:33:48.319 move approval of 00:33:48.319 --> 00:33:53.079 our April 12th minutes. Okay. Chair will second. Any 00:33:53.079 --> 00:33:57.400 discussion? Seeing none call 00:33:57.400 --> 00:34:00.200 for a vote on board. 00:34:07.240 --> 00:34:12.690 The motion carries six to zero. It will take us to our 00:34:12.690 --> 00:34:14.280 consent agenda. 00:34:14.760 --> 00:34:18.880 Commissioner Beck. I move we approve the consent agenda. 00:34:18.880 --> 00:34:20.760 Okay. Commissioner Roselle. 00:34:20.760 --> 00:34:24.820 Second. Okay. We have a first and a second for approval. 00:34:24.820 --> 00:34:25.840 Any discussion on the 00:34:25.840 --> 00:34:38.519 consent agenda? Seeing none I'll call for a vote on board. 00:34:38.519 --> 00:34:41.719 The motion carries six 00:34:41.719 --> 00:34:46.090 to zero which will move us to our public hearing section. I 00:34:46.090 --> 00:34:47.880 'm going to open the 00:34:47.880 --> 00:34:55.250 public hearing for item A S17-0002 and I will call on Haley 00:34:55.250 --> 00:34:55.760 for a 00:34:55.760 --> 00:34:59.000 presentation of this item. 00:35:18.719 --> 00:35:19.159 All right good evening this is case S17-2 for Denton Calv 00:35:19.159 --> 00:35:25.360 ary Academy. The 00:35:25.360 --> 00:35:27.860 request was to hold a public hearing and consider a request 00:35:27.860 --> 00:35:28.760 by the Denton Bible 00:35:28.760 --> 00:35:28.760 Church for a specific use permit to allow a high school use 00:35:28.760 --> 00:35:33.119 on approximately 00:35:33.119 --> 00:35:33.119 13.7 acres. The property is located at the southwest corner 00:35:33.119 --> 00:35:38.159 of the East 00:35:38.159 --> 00:35:38.159 University Drive and Nottingham Drive intersection and it 00:35:38.159 --> 00:35:41.719 is shown in yellow on 00:35:41.719 --> 00:35:47.510 this map. As I mentioned the property is approximately 13.7 00:35:47.510 --> 00:35:48.760 acres total. It has 00:35:48.760 --> 00:35:53.119 frontage on University Drive, Nottingham Drive and Mingo 00:35:53.119 --> 00:35:55.320 Road. The site plan that 00:35:55.320 --> 00:35:57.809 was included in your backup will go through briefly. A 00:35:57.809 --> 00:35:59.440 little history on the 00:35:59.440 --> 00:36:03.679 property in 1999 and ordinance for an SUP was approved to 00:36:03.679 --> 00:36:05.039 allow Denton Calvary 00:36:05.039 --> 00:36:08.170 Academy to operate a private elementary through high school 00:36:08.170 --> 00:36:09.480 . Specifically the 00:36:09.480 --> 00:36:12.570 high school use being the reason for the SUP and the four 00:36:12.570 --> 00:36:14.320 buildings on lot 1R 00:36:14.320 --> 00:36:18.940 that are outlined in green on the map. The proposal now is 00:36:18.940 --> 00:36:20.480 to expand this use 00:36:20.480 --> 00:36:23.650 specifically the high school being the portion that 00:36:23.650 --> 00:36:26.159 requires the SUP onto all 00:36:26.159 --> 00:36:28.380 of the buildings that are outlined in orange on the 00:36:28.380 --> 00:36:29.599 remainder of the property. 00:36:29.599 --> 00:36:33.760 Just a note for clarification in the NRMU zoning district 00:36:33.760 --> 00:36:34.679 the elementary and 00:36:34.679 --> 00:36:37.449 middle school uses are permitted by right so the high 00:36:37.449 --> 00:36:38.119 school use at the 00:36:38.119 --> 00:36:42.340 school is the specific aspect that requires this SUP. 00:36:42.340 --> 00:36:43.880 Everything shown on 00:36:43.880 --> 00:36:46.650 the site plan is existing on the site today and the 00:36:46.650 --> 00:36:47.960 applicant at this time is 00:36:47.960 --> 00:36:50.929 proposing no changes to the parking landscaping or building 00:36:50.929 --> 00:36:51.719 footprints that 00:36:51.719 --> 00:36:56.280 are shown here on the site plan. To give you an idea of 00:36:56.280 --> 00:36:58.000 what's in the area the 00:36:58.000 --> 00:37:01.110 subject property as I mentioned is zoned NRMU. Currently 00:37:01.110 --> 00:37:02.519 the northern portion is 00:37:02.519 --> 00:37:06.139 Denton Calvary Academy. Denton Bible Church owns and 00:37:06.139 --> 00:37:08.000 operates uses on the 00:37:08.000 --> 00:37:12.230 remainder of the subject property. To the north and west is 00:37:12.230 --> 00:37:13.599 an NR3 zoning 00:37:13.599 --> 00:37:16.809 district with single-family homes developed and to the east 00:37:16.809 --> 00:37:17.239 across 00:37:17.239 --> 00:37:20.530 Nottingham Drive is the CMG district where Denton Bible 00:37:20.530 --> 00:37:21.400 Church has its 00:37:21.400 --> 00:37:26.320 primary campus. Expanding a little bit further out we 00:37:26.320 --> 00:37:27.760 gained some retail and 00:37:27.760 --> 00:37:31.210 restaurant uses north of the property along University as 00:37:31.210 --> 00:37:32.159 well as a church 00:37:32.159 --> 00:37:35.639 located across there in the NR3 district. The community 00:37:35.639 --> 00:37:37.079 garden is located on the 00:37:37.079 --> 00:37:41.139 south side of Mingo Road in an NR2 district as well as some 00:37:41.139 --> 00:37:41.440 railroad 00:37:41.440 --> 00:37:47.119 tracks and then further south a multifamily property. In 00:37:47.119 --> 00:37:48.840 general you can 00:37:48.840 --> 00:37:52.150 see this area or this portion of town has a wide variety of 00:37:52.150 --> 00:37:53.039 residential 00:37:53.039 --> 00:37:57.110 institutional and commercial uses as well as a wide array 00:37:57.110 --> 00:37:58.079 of zoning districts 00:37:58.079 --> 00:38:01.079 ranging from residential to getting into some employment 00:38:01.079 --> 00:38:02.199 centers and industrial 00:38:02.199 --> 00:38:08.360 uses off to the east. This area of town is designated by 00:38:08.360 --> 00:38:10.000 the Denton Plan 2030 and 00:38:10.000 --> 00:38:13.449 the future land use map as an area of community mixed use. 00:38:13.449 --> 00:38:14.880 This designation is 00:38:14.880 --> 00:38:17.650 intended to promote a mixture of uses predominantly 00:38:17.650 --> 00:38:18.679 commercial uses with 00:38:18.679 --> 00:38:22.210 supporting residential and service uses. It's intended to 00:38:22.210 --> 00:38:23.239 be an area that we 00:38:23.239 --> 00:38:26.550 promote connectivity and multimodal transportation as well 00:38:26.550 --> 00:38:27.400 as a mixture of 00:38:27.400 --> 00:38:31.199 uses both vertically and horizontally and in this 00:38:31.199 --> 00:38:33.199 designation schools, places of 00:38:33.199 --> 00:38:35.550 worship and parks are all permitted by rights so this use 00:38:35.550 --> 00:38:36.400 is consistent with 00:38:36.400 --> 00:38:40.920 the future land use designation. To look at the mobility 00:38:40.920 --> 00:38:42.280 plan we have University 00:38:42.280 --> 00:38:45.250 Drive on the north which is a primary arterial, Nottingham 00:38:45.250 --> 00:38:46.360 Drive to the east is 00:38:46.360 --> 00:38:49.809 considered a collector and then Mingo Road to the south is 00:38:49.809 --> 00:38:50.440 a secondary 00:38:50.440 --> 00:38:54.300 arterial. In keeping with that multimodal transportation 00:38:54.300 --> 00:38:55.159 that the future land use 00:38:55.159 --> 00:38:57.989 calls for there are existing and or proposed bike routes on 00:38:57.989 --> 00:38:58.519 all of the 00:38:58.519 --> 00:39:02.199 adjoining streets as well as bus routes through DCTA on 00:39:02.199 --> 00:39:03.679 University and Mingo 00:39:03.679 --> 00:39:09.280 Road. To look a little more specifically at what's on the 00:39:09.280 --> 00:39:11.159 site today you can see 00:39:11.159 --> 00:39:14.949 here all the existing buildings and parking there the 00:39:14.949 --> 00:39:16.960 entire site is in 00:39:16.960 --> 00:39:19.730 compliance with the minimum 20% landscape area that's 00:39:19.730 --> 00:39:20.199 required by the 00:39:20.199 --> 00:39:23.469 zoning district and I wanted to point out that the original 00:39:23.469 --> 00:39:24.559 SUP ordinance 00:39:24.559 --> 00:39:28.429 for Denton Calvary Academy found that the existing landsca 00:39:28.429 --> 00:39:29.519 ping on site was 00:39:29.519 --> 00:39:31.920 sufficient to provide compatibility between the school and 00:39:31.920 --> 00:39:32.639 the surrounding 00:39:32.639 --> 00:39:37.480 neighborhood. Just to go through some site photos this 00:39:37.480 --> 00:39:38.360 picture is looking 00:39:38.360 --> 00:39:42.679 towards the west at the existing campus these are some of 00:39:42.679 --> 00:39:43.760 the buildings located 00:39:43.760 --> 00:39:46.980 on the east side of the property along Nottingham Drive and 00:39:46.980 --> 00:39:47.960 then these being 00:39:47.960 --> 00:39:51.539 the southernmost buildings located down on lot four of the 00:39:51.539 --> 00:39:52.719 property and this 00:39:52.719 --> 00:39:55.539 photo also shows some of the landscaping you can see they 00:39:55.539 --> 00:39:55.800 have 00:39:55.800 --> 00:39:58.920 landscaping islands trees to provide canopy coverage for 00:39:58.920 --> 00:39:59.920 the parking lot as 00:39:59.920 --> 00:40:02.690 is required in the DDC and then towards the back of the 00:40:02.690 --> 00:40:03.840 photo you can see the 00:40:03.840 --> 00:40:06.659 western property boundary has a substantial amount of 00:40:06.659 --> 00:40:07.519 landscaping to 00:40:07.519 --> 00:40:11.840 provide a buffer between the school and the residential 00:40:11.840 --> 00:40:13.519 uses and then this photo 00:40:13.519 --> 00:40:16.289 is intended to show the screening that's provided for the 00:40:16.289 --> 00:40:17.039 parking lot there are 00:40:17.039 --> 00:40:20.059 hedgerows and trees existing all along the perimeter of the 00:40:20.059 --> 00:40:21.000 site that screen 00:40:21.000 --> 00:40:25.710 the parking from the adjacent right-of-way. Notification 00:40:25.710 --> 00:40:26.480 was sent out 00:40:26.480 --> 00:40:30.139 about this request we received three responses two in favor 00:40:30.139 --> 00:40:31.079 that were from 00:40:31.079 --> 00:40:33.889 the neighborhood to the south and one in opposition that 00:40:33.889 --> 00:40:34.480 was from the 00:40:34.480 --> 00:40:39.079 neighborhood to the north across University Drive. Staff is 00:40:39.079 --> 00:40:40.000 recommending 00:40:40.000 --> 00:40:42.769 approval of this request based on our land use analysis we 00:40:42.769 --> 00:40:44.119 found that it meets 00:40:44.119 --> 00:40:47.090 all of the requirements for SUP approval outlined in subch 00:40:47.090 --> 00:40:49.760 apter 6 of the DDC. The 00:40:49.760 --> 00:40:52.869 use is already existing on a portion of the property and 00:40:52.869 --> 00:40:53.760 was found to be 00:40:53.760 --> 00:40:57.420 compatible under the original SUP and the expansion of this 00:40:57.420 --> 00:40:58.480 use will be onto a 00:40:58.480 --> 00:41:01.250 fully developed site as you saw on the site plan and they 00:41:01.250 --> 00:41:02.000 're proposing no 00:41:02.000 --> 00:41:05.050 changes to that at this time and the use is also consistent 00:41:05.050 --> 00:41:06.159 with the Denton plan 00:41:06.159 --> 00:41:11.039 2030. Staff is recommending approval with two conditions 00:41:11.039 --> 00:41:12.360 the first being that the 00:41:12.360 --> 00:41:15.329 use be restricted to the existing buildings on the four 00:41:15.329 --> 00:41:16.239 lots that you saw 00:41:16.239 --> 00:41:19.329 on the site plan. We are also proposing that the landsca 00:41:19.329 --> 00:41:20.360 ping coverage and 00:41:20.360 --> 00:41:23.349 parking count be maintained as is reflected on the site 00:41:23.349 --> 00:41:24.320 plan and that any 00:41:24.320 --> 00:41:28.380 changes to what is shown on the site plan be approved to 00:41:28.380 --> 00:41:28.840 require approval 00:41:28.840 --> 00:41:33.070 through an amendment of the SUP. Our second criteria being 00:41:33.070 --> 00:41:34.719 that we recommend 00:41:34.719 --> 00:41:38.400 ordinance 99277 be repealed and replaced by a new ordinance 00:41:38.400 --> 00:41:38.840 that would be 00:41:38.840 --> 00:41:42.739 approved by City Council for this case so that only one SUP 00:41:42.739 --> 00:41:44.019 controls the 00:41:44.019 --> 00:41:46.840 operation of the high school use on the property and I can 00:41:46.840 --> 00:41:47.559 stand for any 00:41:47.559 --> 00:41:50.039 questions at this time. I have a couple questions 00:41:50.039 --> 00:41:51.360 Commissioner Beck. Thank You 00:41:51.360 --> 00:41:56.650 Chair. Haley just for clarification concerning Commissioner 00:41:56.650 --> 00:41:57.119 Taylor's 00:41:57.119 --> 00:42:01.280 concern regarding that impulot that undeveloped lot there 00:42:01.280 --> 00:42:03.159 on Mingo. If the 00:42:03.159 --> 00:42:06.860 Academy decides to build a facility on that that would 00:42:06.860 --> 00:42:09.280 generate another SUP to 00:42:09.280 --> 00:42:12.360 amend this SUP is that correct? With the existing 00:42:12.360 --> 00:42:14.239 recommendation language it would 00:42:14.239 --> 00:42:17.059 be as we indicated previously though staff would be amen 00:42:17.059 --> 00:42:17.960 able to altering 00:42:17.960 --> 00:42:22.019 that language to allow them to develop permitted uses on 00:42:22.019 --> 00:42:23.400 lot four if it were to 00:42:23.400 --> 00:42:25.710 be at the high school use or another use that requires an 00:42:25.710 --> 00:42:26.800 SUP then we would still 00:42:26.800 --> 00:42:29.920 require the SUP approval. We'd have to come back through. 00:42:29.920 --> 00:42:32.960 Okay. Commissioner Roseau. 00:42:32.960 --> 00:42:37.039 Thank You Chair. One of the the second condition says 00:42:37.039 --> 00:42:38.800 ordinance 99277 must be 00:42:38.800 --> 00:42:40.429 repealed and replaced. There's my understanding work 00:42:40.429 --> 00:42:41.559 session that would be 00:42:41.559 --> 00:42:45.880 replaced completely with this new SUP is that correct? Yes. 00:42:45.880 --> 00:42:47.119 So in section one of 00:42:47.119 --> 00:42:51.000 the current ordinance there's four limitations that would 00:42:51.000 --> 00:42:51.719 be effectively 00:42:51.719 --> 00:42:56.619 removed. Student maximum over students hours operation but 00:42:56.619 --> 00:42:57.199 then the last one 00:42:57.199 --> 00:43:00.059 says that any change in light on the property shall be 00:43:00.059 --> 00:43:01.199 designed and maintained 00:43:01.199 --> 00:43:04.170 so as not to shine on otherwise or otherwise disturb 00:43:04.170 --> 00:43:05.039 residential property. 00:43:05.039 --> 00:43:07.250 If that's removed is there any provision and protection 00:43:07.250 --> 00:43:08.199 from the neighborhood 00:43:08.199 --> 00:43:12.559 under in our MU zoning that would effectively help with 00:43:12.559 --> 00:43:13.480 that light 00:43:13.480 --> 00:43:17.219 treatment? Yes sir that's actually a provision as well in 00:43:17.219 --> 00:43:18.159 sub chapter 13 of 00:43:18.159 --> 00:43:20.650 the DDC there are lighting provisions that require all 00:43:20.650 --> 00:43:21.519 light be directed 00:43:21.519 --> 00:43:24.269 downwards so as not to diffuse on other properties as well 00:43:24.269 --> 00:43:25.159 as limitations on the 00:43:25.159 --> 00:43:28.780 amount of light that can exist at the perimeter of a 00:43:28.780 --> 00:43:30.599 property so any changes 00:43:30.599 --> 00:43:34.400 would require an SUP and site plan amendment and that would 00:43:34.400 --> 00:43:35.199 be taken care 00:43:35.199 --> 00:43:37.969 of inherently through the DDC requirements for lighting. 00:43:37.969 --> 00:43:38.400 Okay thank you. 00:43:38.400 --> 00:43:44.380 I have a question to follow up from our work session since 00:43:44.380 --> 00:43:45.239 we don't have the 00:43:45.239 --> 00:43:48.010 actual SUP before us it will be done at City Council's I 00:43:48.010 --> 00:43:49.119 believe what you said 00:43:49.119 --> 00:43:52.090 in work session would you give us the the numbers for the 00:43:52.090 --> 00:43:53.119 number of students 00:43:53.119 --> 00:43:55.400 that will be approved as it moves forward to City Council 00:43:55.400 --> 00:43:56.039 what's been 00:43:56.039 --> 00:43:58.860 presented to us as well as the parking places so we'll all 00:43:58.860 --> 00:43:59.840 have that stated on 00:43:59.840 --> 00:44:03.519 the record here. Yes sir so the parking count the existing 00:44:03.519 --> 00:44:04.159 parking count is 00:44:04.159 --> 00:44:07.610 outlined on the site plan I believe it is 694 spaces that 00:44:07.610 --> 00:44:10.159 are existing and the 00:44:10.159 --> 00:44:12.929 number of students was indicated by the applicant that they 00:44:12.929 --> 00:44:13.599 believe they could 00:44:13.599 --> 00:44:16.469 hold up to 1,500 students but that number is not nailed 00:44:16.469 --> 00:44:17.300 down on the site plan at 00:44:17.300 --> 00:44:21.190 this time. Will that go into the SUP that this is good up 00:44:21.190 --> 00:44:22.679 to 1,500 students in? 00:44:22.679 --> 00:44:25.650 Staff wasn't intending for that too certainly something 00:44:25.650 --> 00:44:26.440 that you all could 00:44:26.440 --> 00:44:28.400 consider if you wanted to add that as an additional 00:44:28.400 --> 00:44:29.719 condition. Is it open-ended 00:44:29.719 --> 00:44:32.199 then so they can have as many students if there's not a 00:44:32.199 --> 00:44:33.760 limitation? Yes it would 00:44:33.760 --> 00:44:36.019 be as many students as they could hold within the existing 00:44:36.019 --> 00:44:37.119 buildings. So for 00:44:37.119 --> 00:44:39.929 their benefit if we don't put a number on it and they want 00:44:39.929 --> 00:44:41.079 to exceed it it 00:44:41.079 --> 00:44:44.159 still falls under the SUP they can go as high as they would 00:44:44.159 --> 00:44:45.199 like? Yes sir. Great 00:44:45.199 --> 00:44:51.639 we'll leave it like it is. Any other questions for staff? 00:44:51.639 --> 00:44:55.239 Thank you Hamie. 00:44:55.239 --> 00:44:59.130 This is a public hearing that one card to speak and I've 00:44:59.130 --> 00:45:00.639 got a number of cards 00:45:00.639 --> 00:45:04.159 and I'll read into the record. Not requesting to speak our 00:45:04.159 --> 00:45:05.239 first speaker is 00:45:05.239 --> 00:45:14.610 Stacey Baxter. Good evening I'm Stacey Baxter the principal 00:45:14.610 --> 00:45:15.800 at Denton Calgary 00:45:15.800 --> 00:45:18.969 Academy and I thank you for the opportunity to speak to you 00:45:18.969 --> 00:45:19.440 this evening. 00:45:19.440 --> 00:45:23.969 I'm here to explain to you the benefit of our school to the 00:45:23.969 --> 00:45:25.400 community to the 00:45:25.400 --> 00:45:28.889 community of Denton and just this year alone our high 00:45:28.889 --> 00:45:30.519 school students 9th to 00:45:30.519 --> 00:45:34.000 12th grade have clocked over 4,000 hours in community 00:45:34.000 --> 00:45:35.800 service. As a Christian 00:45:35.800 --> 00:45:39.000 school we're committed to doing good in the Lord's name and 00:45:39.000 --> 00:45:39.800 it is a requirement 00:45:39.800 --> 00:45:43.010 but you should know that our students go well above what is 00:45:43.010 --> 00:45:44.840 required and are 00:45:44.840 --> 00:45:49.000 frequently logging many extra hours above and beyond. 00:45:49.000 --> 00:45:50.679 Another benefit to the 00:45:50.679 --> 00:45:53.190 community I wanted to share with you is that I often get 00:45:53.190 --> 00:45:54.159 phone calls and/or 00:45:54.159 --> 00:45:57.469 emails from local businesses and business owners who tell 00:45:57.469 --> 00:45:58.280 me they would 00:45:58.280 --> 00:46:02.599 like to hire employ my students in particular high school 00:46:02.599 --> 00:46:03.679 of working age 00:46:03.679 --> 00:46:06.690 because of their high character and their commitment and 00:46:06.690 --> 00:46:07.440 that they're 00:46:07.440 --> 00:46:11.510 reliable employees so they often call me and say I'm 00:46:11.510 --> 00:46:13.159 looking to hire and who do 00:46:13.159 --> 00:46:16.219 you have that is willing so that's another good thing. 00:46:16.219 --> 00:46:17.480 Recently I received an 00:46:17.480 --> 00:46:22.630 email from a person who was a retired military and observed 00:46:22.630 --> 00:46:23.659 some of the 00:46:23.659 --> 00:46:27.739 behavior of our high school students after a baseball game 00:46:27.739 --> 00:46:29.000 and took the time 00:46:29.000 --> 00:46:32.449 to email the school to compliment our students and their 00:46:32.449 --> 00:46:33.800 character and he said 00:46:33.800 --> 00:46:38.159 that it has renewed his belief that in the youth of today 00:46:38.159 --> 00:46:39.159 and greatly 00:46:39.159 --> 00:46:42.159 encouraged him one of our students extended his hand and 00:46:42.159 --> 00:46:43.119 said thank you for 00:46:43.119 --> 00:46:46.639 your service to our country and he was so moved that he 00:46:46.639 --> 00:46:48.440 went to our website to 00:46:48.440 --> 00:46:50.920 find out my name so that he could let me know that that 00:46:50.920 --> 00:46:51.760 happened and that it 00:46:51.760 --> 00:46:55.219 encouraged him greatly. We have been on this property for 00:46:55.219 --> 00:46:56.599 18 years as you have 00:46:56.599 --> 00:47:00.190 heard and we have expanded we've had consistent growth I 00:47:00.190 --> 00:47:01.760 think you should 00:47:01.760 --> 00:47:05.039 know that that is due to the the partnership the very very 00:47:05.039 --> 00:47:05.400 close 00:47:05.400 --> 00:47:08.260 partnership that we have with our parents it is a true 00:47:08.260 --> 00:47:09.159 partnership between 00:47:09.159 --> 00:47:12.739 the home and the school and so the accountability is very 00:47:12.739 --> 00:47:13.880 high and therefore 00:47:13.880 --> 00:47:18.889 I can ensure you all that we will continue to be a benefit 00:47:18.889 --> 00:47:19.599 to this 00:47:19.599 --> 00:47:23.670 community. We want to reach out and give back as a matter 00:47:23.670 --> 00:47:24.360 of fact when you had 00:47:24.360 --> 00:47:26.800 your map up there I want you to know that I personally with 00:47:26.800 --> 00:47:27.559 the students have 00:47:27.559 --> 00:47:31.880 gone along Nottingham and Mingo to pick up trash and so we 00:47:31.880 --> 00:47:33.960 want to be leaving it 00:47:33.960 --> 00:47:37.119 better than we found it but as we expand and and become 00:47:37.119 --> 00:47:38.480 owners that commitment 00:47:38.480 --> 00:47:41.469 stands and so I wanted to give you my word on that. It's an 00:47:41.469 --> 00:47:43.539 excellent school we 00:47:43.539 --> 00:47:46.380 have received many many awards for our academics fine arts 00:47:46.380 --> 00:47:47.360 and athletics and 00:47:47.360 --> 00:47:50.130 art a fully accredited school and I just really thank you 00:47:50.130 --> 00:47:51.920 for the opportunity for 00:47:51.920 --> 00:47:54.800 me to speak to you tonight about the benefit of Denton Calv 00:47:54.800 --> 00:47:55.760 ary in your 00:47:55.760 --> 00:48:01.280 community in my community thank you. I'll second all your 00:48:01.280 --> 00:48:02.639 comments there's some 00:48:02.639 --> 00:48:05.519 great students out there I know a lot of the students and 00:48:05.519 --> 00:48:07.119 the families it's a 00:48:07.119 --> 00:48:10.440 great school and we're glad to have you here before us and 00:48:10.440 --> 00:48:11.119 hopefully get you an 00:48:11.119 --> 00:48:19.750 SUP thank you. Anybody else that would like to speak it's a 00:48:19.750 --> 00:48:20.679 public hearing so 00:48:20.679 --> 00:48:25.599 feel free and otherwise I'll read cards into the record 00:48:25.599 --> 00:48:28.199 here. I have Everett 00:48:28.199 --> 00:48:35.119 Newland in support I have Darren Thompson in support I have 00:48:35.119 --> 00:48:36.360 Ryan Sawyer 00:48:36.360 --> 00:48:43.559 support Zach Rozelle in support Pat Smith in support 00:48:43.559 --> 00:48:49.630 Jenny Newland in support Max Robertson in support Perla Mc 00:48:49.630 --> 00:48:51.159 Bean in support and 00:48:51.159 --> 00:48:55.480 Courtney Robertson in support. Again this is a public 00:48:55.480 --> 00:48:57.039 hearing anybody who would 00:48:57.039 --> 00:49:01.199 like to speak on this item please come forward at this time 00:49:01.199 --> 00:49:04.440 . Last call. Seeing 00:49:04.440 --> 00:49:08.960 none I will close the public hearing and open the floor for 00:49:08.960 --> 00:49:10.039 discussion. 00:49:11.559 --> 00:49:17.429 Commissioner Rozelle. Commissioner Taylor makes the motion 00:49:17.429 --> 00:49:17.880 I just wanted to 00:49:17.880 --> 00:49:20.679 clarify with legal how that motion would be worded exactly 00:49:20.679 --> 00:49:23.440 to exclude to make the 00:49:23.440 --> 00:49:26.889 correction that staff suggested there's not limitation on 00:49:26.889 --> 00:49:27.599 NRMU buildings. 00:49:27.599 --> 00:49:34.400 You got it okay. Commissioner Tyler. I think I've got it 00:49:34.400 --> 00:49:38.320 thank you chair so I 00:49:38.320 --> 00:49:42.420 move we recommend approval of this SUP with staff's 00:49:42.420 --> 00:49:43.920 conditions and an 00:49:43.920 --> 00:49:47.400 additional clarification my final sentence added to 00:49:47.400 --> 00:49:49.719 condition number one 00:49:49.719 --> 00:49:52.489 currently it reads any changes to building footprints 00:49:52.489 --> 00:49:53.320 parking counts 00:49:53.320 --> 00:49:55.820 parking lot layouts or landscaping area must be approved by 00:49:55.820 --> 00:49:56.880 amending the SUP 00:49:56.880 --> 00:50:04.719 say on lots one two and three lot four are can develop any 00:50:04.719 --> 00:50:06.159 with any permitted 00:50:06.159 --> 00:50:11.610 use in accordance with debt and development code meeting 00:50:11.610 --> 00:50:11.679 debt and 00:50:11.679 --> 00:50:17.050 development code standards legal does that sound like that 00:50:17.050 --> 00:50:20.320 okay. Commissioner 00:50:20.320 --> 00:50:30.920 Rozelle. I second. Any discussion? Seeing none I'll call 00:50:30.920 --> 00:50:33.559 for a vote on board. 00:50:38.920 --> 00:50:43.800 Motion carries six to zero congratulations. 00:50:49.280 --> 00:50:53.599 I'll give the room a few minutes to clear. 00:51:09.199 --> 00:51:15.059 At this time I will open the public hearing for item B Z 17 00:51:15.059 --> 00:51:15.559 - zero zero zero 00:51:15.559 --> 00:51:19.710 zero seven and I will call on Haley Zygursky for 00:51:19.710 --> 00:51:21.079 presentation. 00:51:29.559 --> 00:51:35.750 All right so this is case Z 17 7 for CST corner store. The 00:51:35.750 --> 00:51:37.199 request was to hold a 00:51:37.199 --> 00:51:40.170 public hearing and consider a rezoning request by Vanda 00:51:40.170 --> 00:51:41.239 Smith developers to 00:51:41.239 --> 00:51:44.010 rezone approximately 0.8 acres from neighborhood 00:51:44.010 --> 00:51:44.920 residential mixed use 00:51:44.920 --> 00:51:48.090 district to CMG district. The property is located on the 00:51:48.090 --> 00:51:49.159 north side of Hobson 00:51:49.159 --> 00:51:52.880 Lane approximately 340 feet east of Country Club Road. As I 00:51:52.880 --> 00:51:54.360 mentioned the 00:51:54.360 --> 00:51:57.199 property is just under one acre and it has about 100 feet 00:51:57.199 --> 00:51:58.360 of frontage on Hobson 00:51:58.360 --> 00:52:03.219 Lane. You can see here looking at the property and the 00:52:03.219 --> 00:52:04.519 zoning map that 00:52:04.519 --> 00:52:07.289 currently the subject property is an isolated area of NRMU 00:52:07.289 --> 00:52:08.320 district. You may 00:52:08.320 --> 00:52:11.360 remember we recently had a request and the rezoning was 00:52:11.360 --> 00:52:12.320 approved for the 00:52:12.320 --> 00:52:16.380 property directly to the east rezoning that from NRMU to CM 00:52:16.380 --> 00:52:18.199 G and as a part of 00:52:18.199 --> 00:52:20.969 that that rendered the subject property an isolated zoning 00:52:20.969 --> 00:52:21.840 district so staff had 00:52:21.840 --> 00:52:23.949 recommended at that time that we proceed with rezoning the 00:52:23.949 --> 00:52:24.519 remainder of 00:52:24.519 --> 00:52:28.980 that to provide two zoning districts on this larger parent 00:52:28.980 --> 00:52:30.599 tract and facilitate 00:52:30.599 --> 00:52:33.610 more cohesive development of the site. So immediately adjo 00:52:33.610 --> 00:52:34.760 ining the property to 00:52:34.760 --> 00:52:37.579 the east as I've mentioned or to the west I'm sorry we have 00:52:37.579 --> 00:52:38.239 a CMG district 00:52:38.239 --> 00:52:41.690 currently vacant land with a single-family home on the 00:52:41.690 --> 00:52:42.559 north side. To 00:52:42.559 --> 00:52:45.409 the north and east of the property we have in our sixth 00:52:45.409 --> 00:52:46.679 district primarily 00:52:46.679 --> 00:52:50.239 vacant property with some single-family uses to the north. 00:52:50.239 --> 00:52:51.239 Across Hobson Lane is 00:52:51.239 --> 00:52:55.119 NR2 district with single-family uses and then further to 00:52:55.119 --> 00:52:56.280 the west along Country 00:52:56.280 --> 00:53:00.400 Club Road we have NRMU district developed with offices, a 00:53:00.400 --> 00:53:01.119 fueling station 00:53:01.119 --> 00:53:05.449 and some multifamily development. Extending further out you 00:53:05.449 --> 00:53:06.360 see there's a 00:53:06.360 --> 00:53:09.130 wider mix of zoning districts in this area specifically 00:53:09.130 --> 00:53:09.840 across Fort Worth 00:53:09.840 --> 00:53:12.610 Drive there's a mixture of employment center and industrial 00:53:12.610 --> 00:53:13.159 zoning districts 00:53:13.159 --> 00:53:16.610 with uses such as manufactured housing there's a landsca 00:53:16.610 --> 00:53:17.679 ping company with a 00:53:17.679 --> 00:53:20.440 large property over there as well as some other commercial 00:53:20.440 --> 00:53:20.840 uses such as a 00:53:20.840 --> 00:53:25.059 veterinarian's office. And you can see again the NR6 00:53:25.059 --> 00:53:26.320 district and NR2 district 00:53:26.320 --> 00:53:29.210 extend further to the north and south respectively and then 00:53:29.210 --> 00:53:30.159 a continuation of 00:53:30.159 --> 00:53:34.920 the NRMU district to the southwest. Looking at this general 00:53:34.920 --> 00:53:35.840 area of town you 00:53:35.840 --> 00:53:38.710 can see it's a wide variety of zonings a mixture of 00:53:38.710 --> 00:53:40.159 industrial commercial 00:53:40.159 --> 00:53:45.730 residential uses throughout the area. The future land use 00:53:45.730 --> 00:53:47.559 for this larger area of 00:53:47.559 --> 00:53:50.360 the city along Fort Worth Drive and Country Club and Hobson 00:53:50.360 --> 00:53:51.000 specifically 00:53:51.000 --> 00:53:54.309 where the property is is designated as community mixed use 00:53:54.309 --> 00:53:55.159 by the future land 00:53:55.159 --> 00:53:58.329 use map so again this area is intended to promote mixture 00:53:58.329 --> 00:53:59.360 of uses predominantly 00:53:59.360 --> 00:54:03.010 commercial with some supporting other services in 00:54:03.010 --> 00:54:04.639 residential areas. Again 00:54:04.639 --> 00:54:07.480 intended to accommodate multimodal transportation and 00:54:07.480 --> 00:54:08.239 connectivity 00:54:08.239 --> 00:54:11.329 throughout the area by providing a mixture of vertical and 00:54:11.329 --> 00:54:12.280 horizontal uses 00:54:12.280 --> 00:54:15.300 across these properties and typical developments would 00:54:15.300 --> 00:54:16.519 include things such as 00:54:16.519 --> 00:54:20.250 service stations, shopping centers, supermarkets, offices 00:54:20.250 --> 00:54:21.280 and that variety of 00:54:21.280 --> 00:54:26.440 commercial uses. Looking at the mobility plan Hobson Lane 00:54:26.440 --> 00:54:27.360 and Country Club are 00:54:27.360 --> 00:54:30.599 both designated as secondary arterial roads Fort Worth 00:54:30.599 --> 00:54:31.840 Drive is a primary 00:54:31.840 --> 00:54:34.190 arterial Fort Worth Drive and Country Club are both text 00:54:34.190 --> 00:54:35.760 out roadways and 00:54:35.760 --> 00:54:38.630 immediately adjacent to the subject property Hobson is 00:54:38.630 --> 00:54:39.480 currently only 00:54:39.480 --> 00:54:42.039 developed as a two-lane undivided roadway not yet built out 00:54:42.039 --> 00:54:42.960 to full secondary 00:54:42.960 --> 00:54:47.559 arterial standards. Notifications were sent about this 00:54:47.559 --> 00:54:48.920 request we received two 00:54:48.920 --> 00:54:53.409 written responses one in opposition and one in favor and 00:54:53.409 --> 00:54:54.760 staff is recommending 00:54:54.760 --> 00:54:58.059 approval based on our land use analysis it is compatible 00:54:58.059 --> 00:54:59.199 with the surrounding 00:54:59.199 --> 00:55:02.239 zoning and land uses it does eliminate that isolated zoning 00:55:02.239 --> 00:55:03.199 district of NRMU 00:55:03.199 --> 00:55:06.929 and it is consistent with the Denton plan 2030 designation 00:55:06.929 --> 00:55:08.679 for this area and 00:55:08.679 --> 00:55:13.909 with that I can answer any questions. Commissioner Roselle. 00:55:13.909 --> 00:55:14.480 Thank you chair 00:55:14.480 --> 00:55:19.679 just for clarification this property owner came to us two 00:55:19.679 --> 00:55:20.599 meetings ago and 00:55:20.599 --> 00:55:25.539 because of some zoning discrepancies is staff asked them to 00:55:25.539 --> 00:55:27.079 come back just so we 00:55:27.079 --> 00:55:29.559 could unify those two properties? Yes it was a staff 00:55:29.559 --> 00:55:30.679 initiated request that they 00:55:30.679 --> 00:55:33.550 were amenable to to promote or facilitate future 00:55:33.550 --> 00:55:34.880 development under just 00:55:34.880 --> 00:55:36.559 two zoning districts on the property. So this is more of a 00:55:36.559 --> 00:55:39.440 just a follow-up from the left behind land from a couple 00:55:39.440 --> 00:55:40.159 weeks ago? Yes sir. 00:55:40.159 --> 00:55:50.320 Okay. Any other questions for staff? Thank you having again 00:55:50.320 --> 00:55:51.000 this is a public 00:55:51.000 --> 00:55:53.969 hearing anybody wishing to speak on this item please come 00:55:53.969 --> 00:55:56.360 forward at this time. 00:55:57.079 --> 00:56:09.889 Please state your name and address. Nathan Toon 3717 Merrim 00:56:09.889 --> 00:56:11.679 ack Drive in Denton. 00:56:11.679 --> 00:56:15.329 I'm a representative of Vanda Smith developers just here if 00:56:15.329 --> 00:56:16.159 you have any 00:56:16.159 --> 00:56:24.840 questions. Any questions for the applicant? Thank you. 00:56:24.840 --> 00:56:27.610 Anybody else that would like to speak on this item please 00:56:27.610 --> 00:56:28.360 come forward at this 00:56:28.360 --> 00:56:34.679 time. Seeing none I'll close the public hearing and open 00:56:34.679 --> 00:56:38.360 the floor for discussion. 00:56:39.239 --> 00:56:49.099 Commissioner Roselle. I move to approve item Z 17 - 7. 00:56:49.099 --> 00:56:49.800 Commissioner Hudsworth. 00:56:49.800 --> 00:56:53.860 Second. Okay. I have a first and a second for approval. Any 00:56:53.860 --> 00:56:55.239 further discussion? 00:56:55.239 --> 00:56:58.969 Commissioner Ellis. Thank you chair. I am going to support 00:56:58.969 --> 00:57:00.280 this tonight but I just 00:57:00.280 --> 00:57:03.250 wanted to get on the record a few comments. I was against 00:57:03.250 --> 00:57:04.199 this rezoning to 00:57:04.199 --> 00:57:09.110 CMG the last time and and I am sorry that it passed but 00:57:09.110 --> 00:57:11.079 being that it did pass it 00:57:11.079 --> 00:57:13.849 doesn't make any sense for me to vote against this 00:57:13.849 --> 00:57:14.960 particular tract of land 00:57:14.960 --> 00:57:18.159 but I wanted to get that on the record as to why I am 00:57:18.159 --> 00:57:19.800 voting for this tonight. 00:57:19.800 --> 00:57:25.039 Thank you for the clarification. Any other discussion? 00:57:25.039 --> 00:57:28.400 Seeing none I'll call 00:57:28.400 --> 00:57:31.119 for a vote on board. 00:57:36.400 --> 00:57:46.800 Motion carries 6 to 0. That will move us to our item C and 00:57:46.800 --> 00:57:47.480 I'm going to ask for 00:57:47.480 --> 00:57:51.119 just a clarification. We currently have a public hearing 00:57:51.119 --> 00:57:52.480 open on that so we need 00:57:52.480 --> 00:57:55.449 to call for anybody that would like to speak on that first 00:57:55.449 --> 00:57:56.719 correct? We do not 00:57:56.719 --> 00:58:02.639 have any cards to speak but yes you can make a call. I'm 00:58:02.639 --> 00:58:04.079 going to just for a 00:58:04.079 --> 00:58:11.199 point of order on our item Z 17 - 0002 C this item is still 00:58:11.199 --> 00:58:12.559 open from our 00:58:12.559 --> 00:58:15.440 previous meeting so if there's anyone here who would like 00:58:15.440 --> 00:58:16.280 to speak on this 00:58:16.280 --> 00:58:21.539 item please come forward at this time. Seeing none I will 00:58:21.539 --> 00:58:22.920 close the public 00:58:22.920 --> 00:58:28.079 hearing and Commissioner Taylor. I move we postpone this 00:58:28.079 --> 00:58:29.599 item indefinitely until 00:58:29.599 --> 00:58:35.119 such time as the applicant has held a community meeting. 00:58:35.119 --> 00:58:36.519 Commissioner Ellis. 00:58:36.519 --> 00:58:42.309 I will second. Okay Commissioner Rozelle. Just to clarify 00:58:42.309 --> 00:58:43.960 is that a condition that 00:58:43.960 --> 00:58:48.019 before they come back they have to have a community meeting 00:58:48.019 --> 00:58:51.079 ? Yes. I believe that's 00:58:51.079 --> 00:58:54.139 more informational is what Commissioner Taylor was trying 00:58:54.139 --> 00:58:57.360 to say and our 00:58:57.360 --> 00:59:00.130 postponement will be indefinitely until they bring it back. 00:59:00.130 --> 00:59:01.639 Thank you. Well I 00:59:01.639 --> 00:59:04.239 guess I was clear they don't have to submit proof that they 00:59:04.239 --> 00:59:04.559 had a community 00:59:04.559 --> 00:59:07.360 meeting to come back in the future? No that won't be a 00:59:07.360 --> 00:59:08.639 condition of the motion. 00:59:08.639 --> 00:59:12.719 Thank you. Does the chair need to ask for an amendment to 00:59:12.719 --> 00:59:13.920 clarify that of the 00:59:13.920 --> 00:59:19.960 motioner and a seconder? I understand that's clear I just 00:59:19.960 --> 00:59:20.960 want a clarification I 00:59:20.960 --> 00:59:28.570 suppose. That was the motion so shall I restate? Please 00:59:28.570 --> 00:59:29.760 restate your motion with 00:59:29.760 --> 00:59:35.000 the clarification. I move we postpone this public hearing 00:59:35.000 --> 00:59:37.960 indefinitely. 00:59:39.679 --> 00:59:46.309 Commissioner Ellis. Yes I will second. Second all right 00:59:46.309 --> 00:59:47.679 good. Any further discussion or 00:59:47.679 --> 00:59:52.079 clarification? Seeing none let's call for a vote on the 00:59:52.079 --> 00:59:54.239 board. 01:00:01.559 --> 01:00:08.739 That motion carries six to zero. That will move us to our 01:00:08.739 --> 01:00:10.320 project matrix this 01:00:10.320 --> 01:00:15.119 evening. Okay are there any items that you guys would like 01:00:15.119 --> 01:00:16.000 to add to the matrix 01:00:16.000 --> 01:00:30.940 at this time? Okay I'm just gonna ask a follow-up. I had a 01:00:30.940 --> 01:00:31.840 pretty lengthy one 01:00:31.840 --> 01:00:34.610 that I put on from last meeting. I don't know when that 01:00:34.610 --> 01:00:35.880 will possibly come before 01:00:35.880 --> 01:00:39.190 us or if that's maybe more appropriate when we get past 01:00:39.190 --> 01:00:40.599 elections I'll leave 01:00:40.599 --> 01:00:46.110 that up for staff to give us an update on that. Is this one 01:00:46.110 --> 01:00:47.800 referring to the 01:00:47.800 --> 01:00:51.719 financial analysis? Correct. 01:00:54.840 --> 01:01:03.039 Yeah and you can take that one. We were going to get with 01:01:03.039 --> 01:01:04.079 you individually 01:01:04.079 --> 01:01:08.139 okay and discuss it before we bring forward anything. 01:01:08.139 --> 01:01:09.280 Perfect let me know when 01:01:09.280 --> 01:01:15.719 we'd like to get together on that. Anybody else? Okay 01:01:15.719 --> 01:01:17.280 seeing none I will 01:01:17.280 --> 01:01:22.840 close our meeting this evening at 7.06. Thank you everyone.