1 00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:05,000 for April 26th. This meeting has been duly posted and we do 2 00:00:05,000 --> 00:00:05,639 have a quorum 3 00:00:05,639 --> 00:00:09,960 present and I will call us to order at 535 and I will turn 4 00:00:09,960 --> 00:00:11,199 our meeting over to 5 00:00:11,199 --> 00:00:17,600 Shandrin for work session clarification. Thank you Chair. 6 00:00:17,600 --> 00:00:19,320 Before we get started I 7 00:00:19,320 --> 00:00:22,769 wanted to take this opportunity to introduce a new employee 8 00:00:22,769 --> 00:00:24,399 . We have Robert 9 00:00:24,399 --> 00:00:28,719 Bob Mikowski who is serving as our new planning supervisor 10 00:00:28,719 --> 00:00:30,239 in the development 11 00:00:30,239 --> 00:00:37,740 review section of planning. Bob is a civil cultureist and 12 00:00:37,740 --> 00:00:39,799 he comes to us with 13 00:00:39,799 --> 00:00:43,869 experience from the US Forest Service and the Florida 14 00:00:43,869 --> 00:00:44,600 Forest Service. 15 00:00:44,600 --> 00:00:48,659 So Bob if you want to come and introduce yourself and tell 16 00:00:48,659 --> 00:00:49,320 us a little bit about 17 00:00:49,320 --> 00:01:01,750 yourself. Well Shandrin mentioned I'm Bob Mikowski and I 18 00:01:01,750 --> 00:01:03,079 retired from the US Forest 19 00:01:03,079 --> 00:01:06,579 Service after 32 and a half years of federal service and 20 00:01:06,579 --> 00:01:07,560 some of that was 21 00:01:07,560 --> 00:01:10,329 with military installations. I was stationed at Eglin Air 22 00:01:10,329 --> 00:01:11,680 Force Base as a civilian. 23 00:01:11,680 --> 00:01:15,340 Moody Air Force Base in Valdosta, Fort Knox, Kentucky. 24 00:01:15,340 --> 00:01:16,879 Working as chief of plans 25 00:01:16,879 --> 00:01:21,390 programs and analysis, environmental analysis. Also worked 26 00:01:21,390 --> 00:01:22,599 as a forester on 27 00:01:22,599 --> 00:01:26,370 those bases, natural and cultural resource manager and most 28 00:01:26,370 --> 00:01:27,319 recently with 29 00:01:27,319 --> 00:01:29,439 the federal government I was a regional civil cultureist 30 00:01:29,439 --> 00:01:30,519 out Atlanta, handled the 31 00:01:30,519 --> 00:01:34,230 national forest from Virginia to Texas. Retired down to 32 00:01:34,230 --> 00:01:36,159 Florida. Two weeks later 33 00:01:36,159 --> 00:01:38,930 I was working for this Florida Forest Service as the county 34 00:01:38,930 --> 00:01:39,680 forester for Polk 35 00:01:39,680 --> 00:01:42,739 Hillsborough and Pinellas counties. Well my daughter who 36 00:01:42,739 --> 00:01:43,719 lives in Savannah 37 00:01:43,719 --> 00:01:46,489 recently had her second grandchild and was pulling at us to 38 00:01:46,489 --> 00:01:47,439 come out this way. I 39 00:01:47,439 --> 00:01:50,209 said only if I can find work. I'm not gonna come out there 40 00:01:50,209 --> 00:01:51,519 and babysit 24/7 41 00:01:51,519 --> 00:01:54,840 but Nana wanted out here so I look for gainful employment 42 00:01:54,840 --> 00:01:56,000 and was fortunate 43 00:01:56,000 --> 00:02:00,049 enough to land in the city here so I look forward to 44 00:02:00,049 --> 00:02:01,280 working with y'all. Thank 45 00:02:01,280 --> 00:02:05,230 you. So now I only have one job instead of two so I'm very 46 00:02:05,230 --> 00:02:06,799 excited that Bob is on board. 47 00:02:06,799 --> 00:02:15,099 He's helping me with the planners. He'll be supervising Hay 48 00:02:15,099 --> 00:02:16,060 wood as well as the 49 00:02:16,060 --> 00:02:19,879 planners, the case managers that come through the planning 50 00:02:19,879 --> 00:02:20,840 commission so 51 00:02:20,840 --> 00:02:27,000 he'll be helping me out. One more thing before we get into 52 00:02:27,000 --> 00:02:29,000 the cases the 53 00:02:29,000 --> 00:02:33,319 Clarion group is working full steam ahead on the DDC 54 00:02:33,319 --> 00:02:34,699 rewrite and we are 55 00:02:34,699 --> 00:02:38,830 planning to do a public kickoff meeting in June. At that 56 00:02:38,830 --> 00:02:40,259 same time I wanted to 57 00:02:40,259 --> 00:02:43,569 convene the PNZ subcommittee for the DDC rewrite so I 58 00:02:43,569 --> 00:02:45,159 wanted to see if that first 59 00:02:45,159 --> 00:02:49,699 week of June is workable or doable for the group. I'm 60 00:02:49,699 --> 00:02:52,919 thinking June 6th, 5th or 6th. 61 00:02:52,919 --> 00:03:00,659 Can you remind us of the members? I know I know I am. Okay. 62 00:03:00,659 --> 00:03:01,680 That's what I thought. 63 00:03:01,680 --> 00:03:10,819 Ellis, it's either a Tuesday or a Wednesday. Did you say 64 00:03:10,819 --> 00:03:11,599 what time you 65 00:03:11,599 --> 00:03:15,110 were wanting to meet? Would it be work hours or after hours 66 00:03:15,110 --> 00:03:19,000 ? Whatever you prefer 67 00:03:19,000 --> 00:03:22,560 they'll be in town for those two days so I'm trying to... 68 00:03:22,560 --> 00:03:26,240 May 2nd or 3rd? It's going to be the 69 00:03:26,240 --> 00:03:29,909 week of June 5th so probably the 6th is the day that I'm 70 00:03:29,909 --> 00:03:31,280 shooting for during the 71 00:03:31,280 --> 00:03:39,849 day if we can. City Council is the 5th? Of course it 72 00:03:39,849 --> 00:03:44,919 affects you Commissioner. 73 00:03:44,919 --> 00:03:51,189 I'm available that week during the week or after. Okay. 74 00:03:51,189 --> 00:03:53,919 Everybody good? Okay. 75 00:03:53,919 --> 00:03:59,539 So we'll get that scheduled. Moving to the agenda, does 76 00:03:59,539 --> 00:04:01,840 anybody have any discussion 77 00:04:01,840 --> 00:04:06,439 on the minutes for March 2nd or April 12th? 78 00:04:07,000 --> 00:04:10,449 Commissioner Ellis. Thank you Chair. I do have a question 79 00:04:10,449 --> 00:04:11,759 and I don't know if we 80 00:04:11,759 --> 00:04:15,060 can confirm it since Commissioner Hugsmith isn't here but 81 00:04:15,060 --> 00:04:16,519 it's line 35 on 82 00:04:16,519 --> 00:04:22,430 page 5 March 22nd minutes. I'm pretty sure that that line 83 00:04:22,430 --> 00:04:24,759 is not correct since 84 00:04:24,759 --> 00:04:30,000 he made the motion to approve it. And so I don't know if 85 00:04:30,000 --> 00:04:32,480 his name is... it's 86 00:04:32,480 --> 00:04:35,250 supposed to be a different Commissioner who said that or if 87 00:04:35,250 --> 00:04:36,079 it's just written 88 00:04:36,079 --> 00:04:39,720 wrong so that was my question. 89 00:04:40,680 --> 00:04:44,829 Okay we'll make that note. Yeah but I mean in there it says 90 00:04:44,829 --> 00:04:45,839 he does not agree with the 91 00:04:45,839 --> 00:04:48,610 rezone except he motioned to approve it so there's 92 00:04:48,610 --> 00:04:50,079 something about that line 93 00:04:50,079 --> 00:04:53,050 that's not right. Okay. So I just wanted to bring that up. 94 00:04:53,050 --> 00:04:56,160 So do we want to not 95 00:04:56,160 --> 00:04:58,899 vote on that this evening and get that cleaned up since he 96 00:04:58,899 --> 00:04:59,680 's not here or how do 97 00:04:59,680 --> 00:05:02,790 we want to proceed on that? We'll see if he's here for the 98 00:05:02,790 --> 00:05:06,160 regular session. Okay. All right. Was that it for the 99 00:05:06,160 --> 00:05:09,240 minutes? Okay. On the 100 00:05:09,240 --> 00:05:13,149 considered agenda we have two plots a prelim for Harvest 101 00:05:13,149 --> 00:05:14,399 Hill and an 102 00:05:14,399 --> 00:05:19,589 associated final plot and if there's any questions we can 103 00:05:19,589 --> 00:05:20,879 answer those. 104 00:05:20,879 --> 00:05:26,250 Commissioner Beck. Thank you Chair. Kingsrow is currently a 105 00:05:26,250 --> 00:05:27,519 2-8 collector 106 00:05:27,519 --> 00:05:32,569 street and I didn't see any plans on the mobility plan to 107 00:05:32,569 --> 00:05:34,800 expand that so there 108 00:05:34,800 --> 00:05:37,819 appears to be only one means of ingress and egress into 109 00:05:37,819 --> 00:05:39,000 this new development 110 00:05:39,000 --> 00:05:43,519 loop 288. Has the traffic impact analysis been done to see 111 00:05:43,519 --> 00:05:45,839 if Kingsrow is gonna be 112 00:05:45,839 --> 00:05:55,699 able to handle this and Kingsrow yeah Kingsrow gonna be 113 00:05:55,699 --> 00:05:56,480 able to handle this as 114 00:05:56,480 --> 00:06:00,720 it is now. Did we look at that? 115 00:06:09,000 --> 00:06:15,930 I believe Poinsettia is gonna go out onto the loop and that 116 00:06:15,930 --> 00:06:18,680 's our single means of 117 00:06:18,680 --> 00:06:23,810 ingress and egress into the new development. Is that 118 00:06:23,810 --> 00:06:23,959 correct? 119 00:06:25,319 --> 00:06:28,569 Roll us over engineering. Yeah as part of this development 120 00:06:28,569 --> 00:06:29,839 they are extending 121 00:06:29,839 --> 00:06:34,329 Poinsettia to a future loop 288 collector road. There are 122 00:06:34,329 --> 00:06:35,040 no plans to 123 00:06:35,040 --> 00:06:37,810 construct that road at this time since that's the only 124 00:06:37,810 --> 00:06:38,959 portion that's being 125 00:06:38,959 --> 00:06:43,360 dedicated along this stretch. Will it be done in 126 00:06:43,360 --> 00:06:44,800 conjunction with the development? 127 00:06:44,800 --> 00:06:48,689 Right as future development occurs along the loop 288 furn 128 00:06:48,689 --> 00:06:49,959 ished then we'll acquire 129 00:06:49,959 --> 00:06:52,930 additional right-of-way. You say collector road or is that 130 00:06:52,930 --> 00:06:53,959 gonna be a service road? 131 00:06:53,959 --> 00:06:59,160 Same. Okay yeah it's the same term I'm sorry. It will serve 132 00:06:59,160 --> 00:07:00,120 as a service road 133 00:07:00,120 --> 00:07:05,639 to the loop 288 in the future and as soon as we have a 134 00:07:05,639 --> 00:07:06,600 significant amount of 135 00:07:06,600 --> 00:07:09,370 right-of-way as development occurs along the loop and we'll 136 00:07:09,370 --> 00:07:10,439 probably plan a 137 00:07:10,439 --> 00:07:13,339 that'd be a good time to plan a CIP project to build that 138 00:07:13,339 --> 00:07:14,360 service road to 139 00:07:14,360 --> 00:07:17,329 provide that. Another question on this. Is the developer 140 00:07:17,329 --> 00:07:18,480 responsible for the 141 00:07:18,480 --> 00:07:22,540 construction of that new service road? No they were just 142 00:07:22,540 --> 00:07:23,399 going to dedicate the 143 00:07:23,399 --> 00:07:27,480 right-of-way at this time. Okay so that loop 288 is text- 144 00:07:27,480 --> 00:07:28,319 out I believe right? 145 00:07:28,319 --> 00:07:32,720 Loop 280 is text-out but the back of the service road will 146 00:07:32,720 --> 00:07:33,519 be City of Denton. 147 00:07:33,519 --> 00:07:39,430 Oh it will be okay. So it's purely our nickel. Okay. And 148 00:07:39,430 --> 00:07:41,800 there are plans to expand King's 149 00:07:41,800 --> 00:07:44,839 Row along their frontage. It is a partially improved road. 150 00:07:44,839 --> 00:07:45,240 They're just 151 00:07:45,240 --> 00:07:48,879 going to expand it to make it a full width roadway. Okay 152 00:07:48,879 --> 00:07:51,519 good. Okay that's all I had on the road. 153 00:07:51,519 --> 00:07:56,759 I noticed this may go back to Haley. Lot 6 which is along 154 00:07:56,759 --> 00:07:59,079 loop 288 up there on I 155 00:07:59,079 --> 00:08:03,399 guess it would be the Northeast end. It's intended to be 156 00:08:03,399 --> 00:08:04,800 the drainage and 157 00:08:04,800 --> 00:08:08,500 detention Eastman area which is going to be maintained by 158 00:08:08,500 --> 00:08:11,279 the HOA. Any idea what 159 00:08:11,279 --> 00:08:13,389 this is going to look like? Is this going to be maybe a 160 00:08:13,389 --> 00:08:14,560 green space or something 161 00:08:14,560 --> 00:08:18,680 like that or just curious? I'm not specifically familiar 162 00:08:18,680 --> 00:08:19,519 with those plans. 163 00:08:19,519 --> 00:08:23,040 I would imagine the way it's worded is a common area a lot 164 00:08:23,040 --> 00:08:23,959 that it would be some 165 00:08:23,959 --> 00:08:26,079 sort of green space maintained by the HOA but I'm not sure 166 00:08:26,079 --> 00:08:27,079 if there's specific 167 00:08:27,079 --> 00:08:33,559 plans for that. Okay thank you. Commissioner Ells. Thank 168 00:08:33,559 --> 00:08:34,480 you chair. 169 00:08:34,480 --> 00:08:38,360 I just had a question on the note number seven note where 170 00:08:38,360 --> 00:08:39,879 it said prior to final 171 00:08:39,879 --> 00:08:47,500 plat the flood study would be conducted. Do you know if 172 00:08:47,500 --> 00:08:49,879 that was done? 173 00:09:04,879 --> 00:09:10,039 Zoom into that note real quick. A drainage flood study was 174 00:09:10,039 --> 00:09:10,639 performed as 175 00:09:10,639 --> 00:09:14,700 part of this final plot before we would consider approving 176 00:09:14,700 --> 00:09:18,440 this plot. It looks 177 00:09:18,440 --> 00:09:20,830 like this note just needs to be removed from the plot and 178 00:09:20,830 --> 00:09:21,679 we'll make sure it 179 00:09:21,679 --> 00:09:28,840 gets removed before we file the plot. Okay thank you. 180 00:09:32,120 --> 00:09:36,940 Were there any more questions about Harvest Hill? Okay for 181 00:09:36,940 --> 00:09:38,279 our public hearing 182 00:09:38,279 --> 00:09:41,820 items we have an SUP request for the Denton Bible Church 183 00:09:41,820 --> 00:09:43,240 and I'll invite 184 00:09:43,240 --> 00:09:46,120 Haley Zagoski. 185 00:09:51,639 --> 00:09:57,720 All right good evening. So this is S-17-2 for Denton Calv 186 00:09:57,720 --> 00:10:00,240 ary Academy and the 187 00:10:00,240 --> 00:10:03,240 request is to hold a public hearing and consider a request 188 00:10:03,240 --> 00:10:04,120 by Denton Bible 189 00:10:04,120 --> 00:10:07,840 Church for a specific use permit to allow for a high school 190 00:10:07,840 --> 00:10:08,320 use on 191 00:10:08,320 --> 00:10:12,559 approximately 13.7 acres. As you can see here outlined in 192 00:10:12,559 --> 00:10:13,519 yellow the property is 193 00:10:13,519 --> 00:10:16,379 located at the southwest corner of the University Drive Not 194 00:10:16,379 --> 00:10:17,120 tingham Drive 195 00:10:17,120 --> 00:10:21,970 intersection. As I mentioned the site's just a little over 196 00:10:21,970 --> 00:10:22,960 13 and a half acres. 197 00:10:22,960 --> 00:10:28,500 It has frontage on University Nottingham and Mingo Road and 198 00:10:28,500 --> 00:10:29,940 the site plan was 199 00:10:29,940 --> 00:10:32,419 provided in your backup but just to walk you through what's 200 00:10:32,419 --> 00:10:33,559 going on here. This is 201 00:10:33,559 --> 00:10:37,740 a fully developed site consisting of four lots and in 1999 202 00:10:37,740 --> 00:10:38,799 an ordinance was 203 00:10:38,799 --> 00:10:42,980 approved or SUP was approved that allowed for Denton Calv 204 00:10:42,980 --> 00:10:43,759 ary Academy to 205 00:10:43,759 --> 00:10:47,820 develop on the in the four buildings shown in green and 206 00:10:47,820 --> 00:10:49,519 that's lot one R of 207 00:10:49,519 --> 00:10:51,909 the development and Denton Calvary Academy is a private 208 00:10:51,909 --> 00:10:52,519 school that serves 209 00:10:52,519 --> 00:10:56,049 elementary through high school. In the NRMU zoning district 210 00:10:56,049 --> 00:10:56,919 elementary and 211 00:10:56,919 --> 00:10:59,429 middle school are permitted by right. The high school use 212 00:10:59,429 --> 00:11:00,600 requires an SUP so 213 00:11:00,600 --> 00:11:02,720 that's why at that time they sought that just for the high 214 00:11:02,720 --> 00:11:03,679 school portion of 215 00:11:03,679 --> 00:11:07,419 their activity. The proposal now is they would they're int 216 00:11:07,419 --> 00:11:08,919 ending to purchase the 217 00:11:08,919 --> 00:11:12,009 remainder of the property from Denton Bible Church and they 218 00:11:12,009 --> 00:11:13,240 would then like to 219 00:11:13,240 --> 00:11:16,039 extend the use elementary through high school to the 220 00:11:16,039 --> 00:11:17,519 remainder of the property 221 00:11:17,519 --> 00:11:20,679 to all of these buildings that are outlined here in yellow. 222 00:11:20,679 --> 00:11:21,720 So the request 223 00:11:21,720 --> 00:11:23,690 is specifically for the high school but it would encompass 224 00:11:23,690 --> 00:11:24,360 the entire school 225 00:11:24,360 --> 00:11:28,019 with all grades. At this time they're proposing to make no 226 00:11:28,019 --> 00:11:28,679 changes to 227 00:11:28,679 --> 00:11:31,840 everything that's existing on the site so parking landsca 228 00:11:31,840 --> 00:11:33,039 ping and the exterior 229 00:11:33,039 --> 00:11:36,320 buildings and the footprints of those buildings would all 230 00:11:36,320 --> 00:11:38,940 stay the same. So to 231 00:11:38,940 --> 00:11:41,399 give you an idea of what's going on in the area if we look 232 00:11:41,399 --> 00:11:42,159 at the immediately 233 00:11:42,159 --> 00:11:45,690 adjoining properties you see the subject property is zoned 234 00:11:45,690 --> 00:11:47,000 NRMU so neighborhood 235 00:11:47,000 --> 00:11:49,779 residential mixed use and what we have there currently is 236 00:11:49,779 --> 00:11:50,799 the four buildings 237 00:11:50,799 --> 00:11:53,769 where Denton Calvary Academy operates and then on the other 238 00:11:53,769 --> 00:11:54,519 three lots are 239 00:11:54,519 --> 00:11:56,639 buildings that are owned and operated by Denton Bible 240 00:11:56,639 --> 00:11:58,639 Church at this time. Across 241 00:11:58,639 --> 00:12:02,820 Nottingham Drive in a CMG district we have the main campus 242 00:12:02,820 --> 00:12:04,039 for Denton Bible 243 00:12:04,039 --> 00:12:07,259 Church and then on the other sides of the property north 244 00:12:07,259 --> 00:12:08,840 and west we have NR3 245 00:12:08,840 --> 00:12:11,129 district and those are currently developed with single- 246 00:12:11,129 --> 00:12:11,480 family 247 00:12:11,480 --> 00:12:18,000 neighborhoods. Looking a little bit further out you can see 248 00:12:18,000 --> 00:12:18,799 the CMG district 249 00:12:18,799 --> 00:12:21,289 extends across University we get some more retail and 250 00:12:21,289 --> 00:12:22,399 restaurant uses at that 251 00:12:22,399 --> 00:12:25,700 time. On the south side of Mingo Road we have more of the 252 00:12:25,700 --> 00:12:26,840 NRMU district there's 253 00:12:26,840 --> 00:12:29,870 the railroad tracks immediately south of Mingo and then 254 00:12:29,870 --> 00:12:31,200 multifamily uses beyond 255 00:12:31,200 --> 00:12:35,259 that and then you can see to the north and west more NR3 256 00:12:35,259 --> 00:12:36,279 with single-family 257 00:12:36,279 --> 00:12:40,899 development. And just to give you a broader picture of what 258 00:12:40,899 --> 00:12:41,759 's in this area 259 00:12:41,759 --> 00:12:44,730 you can see it's a very broad mix of residential and 260 00:12:44,730 --> 00:12:45,639 commercial and 261 00:12:45,639 --> 00:12:48,919 institutional uses encompassing several zoning districts. 262 00:12:48,919 --> 00:12:49,840 We do have a couple of 263 00:12:49,840 --> 00:12:54,460 city parks in the area as well. The future land use for 264 00:12:54,460 --> 00:12:55,759 this area is community 265 00:12:55,759 --> 00:12:58,919 mixed use so this designation is intended to promote a 266 00:12:58,919 --> 00:12:59,879 mixture of uses 267 00:12:59,879 --> 00:13:03,129 predominantly commercial with supporting residential and 268 00:13:03,129 --> 00:13:04,879 service uses. It's 269 00:13:04,879 --> 00:13:07,360 intended to promote connectivity and multimodal 270 00:13:07,360 --> 00:13:08,440 transportation in an area as 271 00:13:08,440 --> 00:13:11,679 well as promoting both vertical and horizontal mixtures of 272 00:13:11,679 --> 00:13:12,879 uses and 273 00:13:12,879 --> 00:13:15,649 schools, places of worship and parks are all permitted by 274 00:13:15,649 --> 00:13:19,519 right. So the use is the 275 00:13:19,519 --> 00:13:22,000 use that they're proposing for the property does support 276 00:13:22,000 --> 00:13:22,600 areas supported 277 00:13:22,600 --> 00:13:27,470 by this future land use designation. To give you an idea of 278 00:13:27,470 --> 00:13:28,759 the mobility in this 279 00:13:28,759 --> 00:13:32,330 area University Drive is a primary arterial. Nottingham 280 00:13:32,330 --> 00:13:33,399 which runs along 281 00:13:33,399 --> 00:13:35,899 the eastern border of the property is a collector street 282 00:13:35,899 --> 00:13:36,879 and the Mingo Road is a 283 00:13:36,879 --> 00:13:40,940 secondary arterial. There's also existing or proposed bike 284 00:13:40,940 --> 00:13:41,759 routes along all of 285 00:13:41,759 --> 00:13:44,580 those roads as well as Denton County Transit Authority bus 286 00:13:44,580 --> 00:13:45,320 routes that run 287 00:13:45,320 --> 00:13:49,039 through this area. So many means of access and 288 00:13:49,039 --> 00:13:51,399 transportation to this site. 289 00:13:51,399 --> 00:13:55,169 Just to look a little more specifically at the site it does 290 00:13:55,169 --> 00:13:56,279 have two entrances 291 00:13:56,279 --> 00:13:59,049 along University that serve the current school campus. 292 00:13:59,049 --> 00:14:00,519 Three drives currently 293 00:14:00,519 --> 00:14:03,289 exist on Nottingham Road and then the portion of the 294 00:14:03,289 --> 00:14:04,159 property that adjoins 295 00:14:04,159 --> 00:14:08,090 Mingo currently doesn't have anything developed on it. At 296 00:14:08,090 --> 00:14:09,639 the time of the 297 00:14:09,639 --> 00:14:12,950 original adoption of the SUP for the current campus just on 298 00:14:12,950 --> 00:14:13,879 that northern 299 00:14:13,879 --> 00:14:16,990 portion it was determined that the landscaping existing on 300 00:14:16,990 --> 00:14:17,480 site was 301 00:14:17,480 --> 00:14:20,559 sufficient to provide compatibility between the school and 302 00:14:20,559 --> 00:14:20,840 that 303 00:14:20,840 --> 00:14:23,610 neighborhood are joining to the south. And as you can see 304 00:14:23,610 --> 00:14:24,200 here there is a 305 00:14:24,200 --> 00:14:27,240 substantial amount of landscaping on site and it does 306 00:14:27,240 --> 00:14:28,399 exceed the minimum 307 00:14:28,399 --> 00:14:33,220 requirement for the NRMU district on all lots. Just some 308 00:14:33,220 --> 00:14:34,480 site photos to give you 309 00:14:34,480 --> 00:14:36,990 an idea if you're not familiar with the campus. This is 310 00:14:36,990 --> 00:14:37,960 looking towards the west 311 00:14:37,960 --> 00:14:43,409 at one of the existing school buildings. You can see here 312 00:14:43,409 --> 00:14:43,879 this there's these are 313 00:14:43,879 --> 00:14:45,840 some of the buildings on the eastern side of the property 314 00:14:45,840 --> 00:14:46,639 along Nottingham 315 00:14:46,639 --> 00:14:50,960 Drive and then these are the southernmost buildings and you 316 00:14:50,960 --> 00:14:51,240 can see 317 00:14:51,240 --> 00:14:54,320 here the substantial amount of well-established trees that 318 00:14:54,320 --> 00:14:54,879 are in the 319 00:14:54,879 --> 00:14:58,059 parking lot as well as back there along back here in the 320 00:14:58,059 --> 00:14:59,440 back that would be the 321 00:14:59,440 --> 00:15:01,549 western border. So you can see there's a substantial amount 322 00:15:01,549 --> 00:15:02,279 of landscaping as 323 00:15:02,279 --> 00:15:05,080 well as fencing that runs between this and the neighborhood 324 00:15:05,080 --> 00:15:06,519 . And just to give 325 00:15:06,519 --> 00:15:09,970 you an idea there's also hedgerows and large established 326 00:15:09,970 --> 00:15:11,080 trees that screen the 327 00:15:11,080 --> 00:15:16,029 parking lot on all lots from the existing roadways. Not 328 00:15:16,029 --> 00:15:17,240 ification was sent 329 00:15:17,240 --> 00:15:23,029 out about this case. We received two in favor and one in 330 00:15:23,029 --> 00:15:25,039 opposition and you can 331 00:15:25,039 --> 00:15:27,870 see here where the two in favor were in the existing 332 00:15:27,870 --> 00:15:29,360 neighborhood to the south 333 00:15:29,360 --> 00:15:32,129 and then one in opposition across University Drive there. 334 00:15:32,129 --> 00:15:35,039 And I believe I 335 00:15:35,039 --> 00:15:39,990 failed to pass out that opposition to you so I can do that. 336 00:15:39,990 --> 00:15:41,639 Staff is 337 00:15:41,639 --> 00:15:44,610 recommending approval for this case based on our analysis 338 00:15:44,610 --> 00:15:45,720 here. It does meet 339 00:15:45,720 --> 00:15:48,509 all of the requirements for SUP approval that are outlined 340 00:15:48,509 --> 00:15:49,759 in subchapter 6 of the 341 00:15:49,759 --> 00:15:54,120 DDC. Given that the use or yeah the use already exists on a 342 00:15:54,120 --> 00:15:54,559 portion of the 343 00:15:54,559 --> 00:15:58,789 property and the site is fully developed at this time and 344 00:15:58,789 --> 00:16:00,080 it was also found to be 345 00:16:00,080 --> 00:16:04,509 compatible under that 1999 ordinance we felt that it met 346 00:16:04,509 --> 00:16:05,840 all those criteria for 347 00:16:05,840 --> 00:16:09,639 approval. The expansion as I mentioned is onto a fully 348 00:16:09,639 --> 00:16:10,440 developed site. They're 349 00:16:10,440 --> 00:16:12,700 intending no changes to the exterior at this time. They 350 00:16:12,700 --> 00:16:13,600 mentioned doing some 351 00:16:13,600 --> 00:16:16,370 interior remodel to accommodate classrooms but that would 352 00:16:16,370 --> 00:16:17,000 be the extent 353 00:16:17,000 --> 00:16:20,269 of the changes to the site. And the use is also consistent 354 00:16:20,269 --> 00:16:21,399 with the future land 355 00:16:21,399 --> 00:16:24,970 use designation under the Denton Plan 2030. So staff is 356 00:16:24,970 --> 00:16:26,480 recommending approval 357 00:16:26,480 --> 00:16:30,190 with the following conditions. Condition one being that the 358 00:16:30,190 --> 00:16:31,120 use be restricted to 359 00:16:31,120 --> 00:16:33,360 the existing buildings that were shown on the site plan. 360 00:16:33,360 --> 00:16:35,279 The existing landscaping 361 00:16:35,279 --> 00:16:37,600 coverage and parking count should be maintained as they're 362 00:16:37,600 --> 00:16:38,320 shown on the site 363 00:16:38,320 --> 00:16:41,129 plan. And then any changes that they intend to make to the 364 00:16:41,129 --> 00:16:42,000 footprint, the 365 00:16:42,000 --> 00:16:44,970 parking count, the layout and flow of the site, and the 366 00:16:44,970 --> 00:16:46,320 landscaping should then be 367 00:16:46,320 --> 00:16:48,429 approved through an amendment to the SUP so that we can 368 00:16:48,429 --> 00:16:49,000 ensure that 369 00:16:49,000 --> 00:16:51,970 compatibility with the neighborhood is maintained. We also 370 00:16:51,970 --> 00:16:53,440 suggest that 371 00:16:53,440 --> 00:16:57,509 ordinance 99277 be repealed and replaced by this new 372 00:16:57,509 --> 00:16:58,080 ordinance so that 373 00:16:58,080 --> 00:17:01,799 there's only one SUP controlling this use on the property. 374 00:17:01,799 --> 00:17:03,759 And I can answer any 375 00:17:03,759 --> 00:17:09,680 questions. Commissioner Rozelle. Thank you. So starting 376 00:17:09,680 --> 00:17:12,240 last first with the 377 00:17:12,240 --> 00:17:20,079 repeal of ordinance 9927, does this SUP fully contain all 378 00:17:20,079 --> 00:17:21,039 things on the 379 00:17:21,039 --> 00:17:25,279 ordinance 99277? Yes, we would recommend appealing that 380 00:17:25,279 --> 00:17:26,559 ordinance in its entirety. 381 00:17:26,559 --> 00:17:31,410 But does this SUP cover everything on that ordinance or 382 00:17:31,410 --> 00:17:32,240 would there be 383 00:17:32,240 --> 00:17:36,329 changes? So the existing ordinance was provided in your 384 00:17:36,329 --> 00:17:37,480 backup. It had several 385 00:17:37,480 --> 00:17:40,250 provisions about the hours of operation, the number of 386 00:17:40,250 --> 00:17:41,480 students on the campus, and 387 00:17:41,480 --> 00:17:44,529 we felt given the information that was provided by the 388 00:17:44,529 --> 00:17:45,839 applicant that those 389 00:17:45,839 --> 00:17:49,680 were a bit onerous. At full capacity they anticipated they 390 00:17:49,680 --> 00:17:50,119 could handle 391 00:17:50,119 --> 00:17:53,640 approximately 1,500 students. Whichever they would ever 392 00:17:53,640 --> 00:17:54,640 reach that full potential, 393 00:17:54,640 --> 00:17:58,319 I'm not sure. But the existing ordinance, for example, 394 00:17:58,319 --> 00:18:00,039 limited them to 500 students 395 00:18:00,039 --> 00:18:04,089 with no more than 250 being there on any given day. So we 396 00:18:04,089 --> 00:18:05,799 felt that some of those 397 00:18:05,799 --> 00:18:08,259 things may not need to be carried forward, but we do want 398 00:18:08,259 --> 00:18:09,079 to make sure that 399 00:18:09,079 --> 00:18:11,589 the site conditions as you see on the site plan are not 400 00:18:11,589 --> 00:18:13,160 changed without further 401 00:18:13,160 --> 00:18:19,650 amendment and approval of the SUP. Thank you. And then 402 00:18:19,650 --> 00:18:22,119 another question. 403 00:18:23,440 --> 00:18:28,559 When, specific to this case, but also in general, when an 404 00:18:28,559 --> 00:18:31,519 SUP comes forward, does 405 00:18:31,519 --> 00:18:35,579 the city re-measure all the requirements for the zoning? 406 00:18:35,579 --> 00:18:36,799 Because this zoning was 407 00:18:36,799 --> 00:18:40,309 done in 99. Does it meet current parking? Does that get re- 408 00:18:40,309 --> 00:18:41,400 triggered? And if so, was 409 00:18:41,400 --> 00:18:45,460 that looked at or do they get grandfathered and even though 410 00:18:45,460 --> 00:18:46,000 they're 411 00:18:46,000 --> 00:18:49,519 initiated kind of a re-look at the zoning? In this case, 412 00:18:49,519 --> 00:18:50,480 since it was all 413 00:18:50,480 --> 00:18:54,000 existing, we did verify to see it does meet the landscaping 414 00:18:54,000 --> 00:18:54,559 requirements and 415 00:18:54,559 --> 00:18:57,329 lot coverage requirements for NRMU. The buildings are 416 00:18:57,329 --> 00:18:57,960 within the height 417 00:18:57,960 --> 00:19:00,839 restrictions and all of those components. In terms of 418 00:19:00,839 --> 00:19:02,720 parking, there are, I believe, 419 00:19:02,720 --> 00:19:07,039 694 spaces existing. The parking count shown on the SUP was 420 00:19:07,039 --> 00:19:07,519 based on an 421 00:19:07,519 --> 00:19:10,740 absolute worst-case scenario if the buildings were ever to 422 00:19:10,740 --> 00:19:12,400 reach full public 423 00:19:12,400 --> 00:19:16,789 occupancy that was allowed. And that seems like an unlikely 424 00:19:16,789 --> 00:19:18,200 scenario given 425 00:19:18,200 --> 00:19:21,009 that schools are generally calculated based on a classroom 426 00:19:21,009 --> 00:19:21,799 basis, but not 427 00:19:21,799 --> 00:19:24,279 knowing how they might remodel, we couldn't determine the 428 00:19:24,279 --> 00:19:25,000 specific parking 429 00:19:25,000 --> 00:19:28,059 ratio that would be required. So all of that was looked at 430 00:19:28,059 --> 00:19:28,880 and staff felt 431 00:19:28,880 --> 00:19:31,720 comfortable with it meeting the parking demand and 432 00:19:31,720 --> 00:19:32,279 everything that would be 433 00:19:32,279 --> 00:19:37,839 required for the site. Okay, thank you. Commissioner Ellis. 434 00:19:37,839 --> 00:19:39,839 Thank you, Chair. So 435 00:19:39,839 --> 00:19:43,769 Haley, do we have the new written ordinance? Do we have a 436 00:19:43,769 --> 00:19:44,759 cop? We don't 437 00:19:44,759 --> 00:19:48,819 have that? Staff typically prepares that for our City 438 00:19:48,819 --> 00:19:51,440 Council. Okay, so that's when 439 00:19:51,440 --> 00:19:54,599 everything will be written? Yes, based on the 440 00:19:54,599 --> 00:19:55,559 recommendations that you all 441 00:19:55,559 --> 00:19:58,329 have and anything you might want to change in those 442 00:19:58,329 --> 00:20:00,920 requirements. Okay, thanks. 443 00:20:00,920 --> 00:20:06,369 Commissioner Tyler. Thank you, Chair. Regarding condition 444 00:20:06,369 --> 00:20:08,000 number one, there 445 00:20:08,000 --> 00:20:12,170 is an undeveloped area on this lot, so obviously the 446 00:20:12,170 --> 00:20:13,839 proposed use must be 447 00:20:13,839 --> 00:20:16,319 restricted to existing buildings, but then we get down to 448 00:20:16,319 --> 00:20:17,160 landscaping coverage 449 00:20:17,160 --> 00:20:20,759 and parking counts. It seems like if they build anything on 450 00:20:20,759 --> 00:20:22,079 the mingo and 451 00:20:22,079 --> 00:20:25,160 they're going to have to put in a parking lot. Yes, sir. 452 00:20:25,160 --> 00:20:29,200 And so, and since that's not 453 00:20:29,200 --> 00:20:32,099 part of the proposed use, would it apply? Or is the 454 00:20:32,099 --> 00:20:34,160 proposed use only, I guess I'm 455 00:20:34,160 --> 00:20:37,200 trying to tease out if it prevents them from doing anything 456 00:20:37,200 --> 00:20:37,839 on the 457 00:20:37,839 --> 00:20:41,519 undeveloped area without coming back and amending the SUP? 458 00:20:41,519 --> 00:20:43,400 Or if it only 459 00:20:43,400 --> 00:20:46,690 applies to portions of the lot that are part of the 460 00:20:46,690 --> 00:20:49,940 proposed use? Certainly. Did you want to answer that, 461 00:20:49,940 --> 00:20:50,200 Chancellor? 462 00:20:50,200 --> 00:20:55,039 Sure, I'll go. So if the proposed use, the future use is 463 00:20:55,039 --> 00:20:56,720 permitted outright in the zoning 464 00:20:56,720 --> 00:20:59,549 district, doesn't require an SUP, then it goes through our 465 00:20:59,549 --> 00:21:00,440 normal development 466 00:21:00,440 --> 00:21:03,779 process. We'll check, we'll do zoning verification, we'll 467 00:21:03,779 --> 00:21:05,480 check for parking, just 468 00:21:05,480 --> 00:21:08,630 like we would any other site, and it would not have to be 469 00:21:08,630 --> 00:21:09,680 approved by City 470 00:21:09,680 --> 00:21:13,490 Council. But if the new use is another, is extension of the 471 00:21:13,490 --> 00:21:15,000 high school, then it 472 00:21:15,000 --> 00:21:17,279 would come back through the SUP process. Does that answer 473 00:21:17,279 --> 00:21:18,440 your question? Yes, so 474 00:21:18,440 --> 00:21:22,049 even with a binding site plan, we bind them to a site plan 475 00:21:22,049 --> 00:21:22,940 that says no, no 476 00:21:22,940 --> 00:21:25,710 building on the south end, and then they, if they want to 477 00:21:25,710 --> 00:21:26,839 build it, they can build 478 00:21:26,839 --> 00:21:31,940 a building on the south end without amending the SUP? The 479 00:21:31,940 --> 00:21:33,079 limits of 480 00:21:33,079 --> 00:21:36,720 construction for the SUP include the undeveloped parcel? 481 00:21:36,720 --> 00:21:38,400 Yes, they show all 482 00:21:38,400 --> 00:21:41,599 that on the site plan. Okay, so we may need to amend the 483 00:21:41,599 --> 00:21:42,640 limits of construction 484 00:21:42,640 --> 00:21:48,759 for the SUP to remove that. That's a good catch. Thank you. 485 00:21:51,759 --> 00:22:00,559 Any other questions? Thank you. 486 00:22:09,640 --> 00:22:15,440 The next case is the zoning, the rezoning request for 487 00:22:15,440 --> 00:22:16,480 property located at 488 00:22:16,480 --> 00:22:20,650 the corner of Hopson Lane and Country Club Road, and this 489 00:22:20,650 --> 00:22:22,200 is a continuation of 490 00:22:22,200 --> 00:22:29,039 the CST case that we heard a month or so ago. So this is 491 00:22:29,039 --> 00:22:31,079 case Z17-7, again for the 492 00:22:31,079 --> 00:22:35,599 CST corner store. So the request is to hold a public 493 00:22:35,599 --> 00:22:36,799 hearing and consider a 494 00:22:36,799 --> 00:22:40,470 request by the property owners to rezone 0.8 acres from 495 00:22:40,470 --> 00:22:41,400 neighborhood 496 00:22:41,400 --> 00:22:44,269 residential mixed use to CMG district, and this portion of 497 00:22:44,269 --> 00:22:45,119 the property is 498 00:22:45,119 --> 00:22:48,299 located on the north side of Hopson Lane, about 340 feet 499 00:22:48,299 --> 00:22:51,359 east of Country Club Road. 500 00:22:51,440 --> 00:22:54,890 So you may remember a couple of months ago we had the rez 501 00:22:54,890 --> 00:22:56,079 oning for the property 502 00:22:56,079 --> 00:22:59,839 that's shown here in pink that was rezoned from NRMU to CMG 503 00:22:59,839 --> 00:23:00,279 for the 504 00:23:00,279 --> 00:23:04,700 development of a corner store. At that time that rendered 505 00:23:04,700 --> 00:23:06,200 this subject property 506 00:23:06,200 --> 00:23:09,509 an isolated pocket of NRMU zoning, so as a condition of 507 00:23:09,509 --> 00:23:10,839 that staff had recommended 508 00:23:10,839 --> 00:23:13,849 that they rezone this, consolidate the zoning on the 509 00:23:13,849 --> 00:23:15,440 property, because this is 510 00:23:15,440 --> 00:23:17,930 all one lot and at this current time it has three zoning 511 00:23:17,930 --> 00:23:20,880 designations across it. 512 00:23:21,640 --> 00:23:26,140 So again, currently this portion of NRMU is isolated with 513 00:23:26,140 --> 00:23:27,079 no connectivity to 514 00:23:27,079 --> 00:23:30,529 other portions of NRMU district. Immediately adjoining we 515 00:23:30,529 --> 00:23:31,079 have the 516 00:23:31,079 --> 00:23:34,170 recently rezoned CMG part of the property that's currently 517 00:23:34,170 --> 00:23:34,920 vacant on the 518 00:23:34,920 --> 00:23:39,079 south side with a single-family home on the north. To the 519 00:23:39,079 --> 00:23:39,559 north and 520 00:23:39,559 --> 00:23:43,640 east we have NR6 district, chiefly vacant there are some 521 00:23:43,640 --> 00:23:44,359 single-family homes 522 00:23:44,359 --> 00:23:47,680 developed further north. NR2 district exists to the south 523 00:23:47,680 --> 00:23:48,720 across Hopson Lane 524 00:23:48,720 --> 00:23:51,980 with single-family homes, and then a little further to the 525 00:23:51,980 --> 00:23:52,880 west along Country 526 00:23:52,880 --> 00:23:56,190 Club there's NRMU district with offices and existing fuel 527 00:23:56,190 --> 00:23:57,400 ing station and some 528 00:23:57,400 --> 00:24:01,720 multifamily development. Expanding further out you can see 529 00:24:01,720 --> 00:24:02,839 this area gets a 530 00:24:02,839 --> 00:24:05,099 little more complicated. Across Fort Worth Drive there's a 531 00:24:05,099 --> 00:24:05,559 mixture of 532 00:24:05,559 --> 00:24:08,640 employment center and industrial zonings with some 533 00:24:08,640 --> 00:24:10,000 manufactured housing, 534 00:24:10,000 --> 00:24:14,059 landscape companies, a veterinarian's office, a variety of 535 00:24:14,059 --> 00:24:15,319 uses over there. 536 00:24:15,319 --> 00:24:18,440 Again further to the south we maintain the NR2 district 537 00:24:18,440 --> 00:24:19,960 zoning and then the NR6 538 00:24:19,960 --> 00:24:25,140 continues to the north and east. Just to give you a broader 539 00:24:25,140 --> 00:24:27,160 view of the area you 540 00:24:27,160 --> 00:24:30,450 can see this area has a wide mixture of commercial and 541 00:24:30,450 --> 00:24:32,000 industrial and residential 542 00:24:32,000 --> 00:24:37,519 uses going on in it. This entire area along Fort Worth 543 00:24:37,519 --> 00:24:39,079 Drive at Hopson and 544 00:24:39,079 --> 00:24:41,849 Country Club is designated by our future land use map as 545 00:24:41,849 --> 00:24:43,759 community mixed use. So 546 00:24:43,759 --> 00:24:46,170 like we just mentioned with the last case this is intended 547 00:24:46,170 --> 00:24:46,799 to promote a 548 00:24:46,799 --> 00:24:49,579 mixture of uses mainly commercial with service and 549 00:24:49,579 --> 00:24:50,599 residential uses 550 00:24:50,599 --> 00:24:53,819 complementing that. Again it's intended to provide 551 00:24:53,819 --> 00:24:55,319 connectivity, promote 552 00:24:55,319 --> 00:24:57,809 multimodal transportation, promote that mixture 553 00:24:57,809 --> 00:24:59,519 horizontally and vertically of 554 00:24:59,519 --> 00:25:02,710 various uses and some of the typical developments that are 555 00:25:02,710 --> 00:25:03,680 called out in the 556 00:25:03,680 --> 00:25:06,799 Denton plan for this area are service stations, shopping, 557 00:25:06,799 --> 00:25:07,680 supermarkets and 558 00:25:07,680 --> 00:25:12,680 office uses. If we look at our mobility plan you can see 559 00:25:12,680 --> 00:25:13,559 Fort Worth Drive is a 560 00:25:13,559 --> 00:25:16,359 primary arterial. Country Club and Hopson are both 561 00:25:16,359 --> 00:25:19,079 secondary arterials and in 562 00:25:19,079 --> 00:25:23,150 this area Hopson Lane is currently a two-lane undivided 563 00:25:23,150 --> 00:25:24,000 roadway so not yet 564 00:25:24,000 --> 00:25:28,900 fully developed to those secondary arterial standards in 565 00:25:28,900 --> 00:25:30,079 this area. And with 566 00:25:30,079 --> 00:25:33,640 this case we did send out notifications again and we had 567 00:25:33,640 --> 00:25:34,720 one in opposition and 568 00:25:34,720 --> 00:25:40,240 one in favor. And staff is recommending approval based on 569 00:25:40,240 --> 00:25:41,519 this land use analysis 570 00:25:41,519 --> 00:25:45,680 that CMG is compatible with those surrounding zoning and 571 00:25:45,680 --> 00:25:47,079 land uses. It 572 00:25:47,079 --> 00:25:49,190 eliminates that isolated zoning district that was created 573 00:25:49,190 --> 00:25:50,319 with the last re-zoning 574 00:25:50,319 --> 00:25:53,829 and CMG is consistent with the future land use designation 575 00:25:53,829 --> 00:25:54,640 under the Denton 576 00:25:54,640 --> 00:25:59,920 plan 2030. And I can answer any questions at this time. 577 00:25:59,920 --> 00:26:01,640 Commissioner Back. Thank you 578 00:26:01,640 --> 00:26:06,160 Chair. The people making this zoning request are the same 579 00:26:06,160 --> 00:26:06,880 people that are going to 580 00:26:06,880 --> 00:26:09,180 build that convenience store, is that correct? Yes sir it's 581 00:26:09,180 --> 00:26:09,880 the same owner and 582 00:26:09,880 --> 00:26:13,329 same developer. Seems to me to indicate they have plans on 583 00:26:13,329 --> 00:26:14,240 building something 584 00:26:14,240 --> 00:26:18,299 there. This request was triggered primarily by staff's 585 00:26:18,299 --> 00:26:19,140 concern that we had 586 00:26:19,140 --> 00:26:22,589 created that isolated pocket of NRMU so that was the reason 587 00:26:22,589 --> 00:26:23,160 for their 588 00:26:23,160 --> 00:26:26,019 application. At this time I'm not sure based on their site 589 00:26:26,019 --> 00:26:27,039 plan whether their 590 00:26:27,039 --> 00:26:32,960 proposal will extend into this area or not. Okay thank you. 591 00:26:36,880 --> 00:26:40,759 Thank you Haley. 592 00:26:44,119 --> 00:26:48,039 And then the final public hearing item which deals with the 593 00:26:48,039 --> 00:26:49,160 Kruger at Shady 594 00:26:49,160 --> 00:26:53,500 Shores. The applicant has requested an indefinite post-poll 595 00:26:53,500 --> 00:26:55,519 ment of this item so 596 00:26:55,519 --> 00:27:00,019 we won't actually hear this but Jennifer will you go 597 00:27:00,019 --> 00:27:02,440 through the process for how 598 00:27:02,440 --> 00:27:06,809 we are going to handle this one? Yeah last time we actually 599 00:27:06,809 --> 00:27:07,880 kept the public 600 00:27:07,880 --> 00:27:10,759 hearing open so that it would not have to be republished so 601 00:27:10,759 --> 00:27:11,480 we're gonna have to 602 00:27:11,480 --> 00:27:16,119 close that and then we can entertain a motion for postpon 603 00:27:16,119 --> 00:27:18,720 ement indefinitely and 604 00:27:18,720 --> 00:27:22,809 then we'll have to repel a shuttle later time. Does 605 00:27:22,809 --> 00:27:25,240 Commissioner Roselle is there 606 00:27:25,240 --> 00:27:28,210 an opportunity to give testimony before it closes or is the 607 00:27:28,210 --> 00:27:29,039 chair just gonna 608 00:27:29,039 --> 00:27:32,079 simply state it and close it? Do we have to provide 609 00:27:32,079 --> 00:27:34,000 opportunity for people here to 610 00:27:34,000 --> 00:27:37,450 speak about it? We do not have to that is at the discretion 611 00:27:37,450 --> 00:27:39,079 of the chair. Okay I 612 00:27:39,079 --> 00:27:44,819 think last time we didn't have anybody that came on this 613 00:27:44,819 --> 00:27:46,599 particular issue. 614 00:27:46,599 --> 00:27:50,049 We'll look and see if there's people there I think we'll 615 00:27:50,049 --> 00:27:51,039 take a look see how 616 00:27:51,039 --> 00:27:56,799 many people show up and see what we need to do at that time 617 00:27:56,799 --> 00:28:01,400 . Okay with that I will 618 00:28:01,400 --> 00:28:04,890 close our work session at 6.02 and we'll reconvene in 619 00:28:04,890 --> 00:28:06,839 council chambers at 6.30. 620 00:28:06,839 --> 00:28:09,559 Thank you. 621 00:28:27,119 --> 00:28:27,119 Good evening and welcome to the City of Denton Planning and 622 00:28:27,119 --> 00:28:31,119 Zoning Commission 623 00:28:31,119 --> 00:28:36,650 meeting for April the 26th 2017. This meeting has been duly 624 00:28:36,650 --> 00:28:37,720 posted and we do 625 00:28:37,720 --> 00:28:42,200 have a quorum present and I will call us into order at 6.34 626 00:28:42,200 --> 00:28:43,240 . Our first order of 627 00:28:43,240 --> 00:28:46,849 business will be to stand and give the pledge to the US and 628 00:28:46,849 --> 00:28:48,160 the Texas flags. 629 00:29:01,640 --> 00:29:01,640 The Texas flag. I pledge allegiance to the Texas one state 630 00:29:01,640 --> 00:29:01,640 under God one indivisible. The next item on our agenda this 631 00:29:01,640 --> 00:29:30,880 evening will be to consider a 632 00:29:30,880 --> 00:29:33,960 approval of our planning and zoning Commission meeting 633 00:29:33,960 --> 00:29:35,000 minutes and I will 634 00:29:35,000 --> 00:29:38,029 take that in two motions because I think we have some 635 00:29:38,029 --> 00:29:39,640 changes on one of our sets 636 00:29:39,640 --> 00:29:44,519 so a chair would entertain a motion for March 22nd. 637 00:29:48,799 --> 00:29:52,680 Commissioner Rizzo. The March 22nd is the one that needs to 638 00:29:52,680 --> 00:29:53,599 be changed is that 639 00:29:53,599 --> 00:29:56,480 correct? I think that's correct. So I move approval pending 640 00:29:56,480 --> 00:29:57,160 the change for 641 00:29:57,160 --> 00:30:09,279 Commissioner Hutzbeth. You're okay with that? Okay. 642 00:30:14,960 --> 00:30:17,759 Yeah I move for a motion for approval for the March 22nd 643 00:30:17,759 --> 00:30:19,960 minutes. With an 644 00:30:19,960 --> 00:30:23,619 amendment or a change? Right the change with Commissioner H 645 00:30:23,619 --> 00:30:25,160 utzbeth's remarks. Okay 646 00:30:25,160 --> 00:30:28,319 thank you. Commissioner Ellis. I'll second. Okay we have a 647 00:30:28,319 --> 00:30:29,519 first and a second for 648 00:30:29,519 --> 00:30:33,599 approval with a update on the language for Commissioner H 649 00:30:33,599 --> 00:30:35,079 utzbeth. All those in 650 00:30:35,079 --> 00:30:38,559 favor I'll call for a vote on the board. 651 00:30:55,160 --> 00:31:13,779 Chair's gonna back up a step before we call for a vote we 652 00:31:13,779 --> 00:31:14,640 're gonna ask for a 653 00:31:14,640 --> 00:31:19,519 clarification on the motion of what exactly the change is. 654 00:31:19,519 --> 00:31:21,160 Can I defer to 655 00:31:21,160 --> 00:31:26,720 City for that explanation? What was wrong with the minutes 656 00:31:26,720 --> 00:31:27,400 to begin with is on 657 00:31:27,400 --> 00:31:31,559 page 6 line 37 is that correct? 658 00:31:38,400 --> 00:31:41,980 So for clarification on line 35 it says Commissioner Hutzb 659 00:31:41,980 --> 00:31:42,680 eth stated he does not 660 00:31:42,680 --> 00:31:44,980 agree with the rezone that should be Commissioner Hutzbeth 661 00:31:44,980 --> 00:31:46,119 stated he does agree 662 00:31:46,119 --> 00:31:50,000 with the rezone is that correct Commissioner Hutzbeth? 663 00:31:50,000 --> 00:31:55,759 Commissioner Hutzbeth. 664 00:31:55,759 --> 00:32:04,400 I'm sorry is that with you? Yes. Bear with me because I 665 00:32:04,400 --> 00:32:07,079 thought it was 666 00:32:16,279 --> 00:32:26,140 correct. It's correct. The change is correct. Okay but we 667 00:32:26,140 --> 00:32:29,839 're keeping it 668 00:32:29,839 --> 00:32:29,839 doesn't belong in this area? No I thought Commissioner Rose 669 00:32:29,839 --> 00:32:38,559 lle just changed his 670 00:32:38,559 --> 00:32:38,559 motion. Striking the last part of that sentence. Thank you. 671 00:32:38,559 --> 00:32:45,319 We have clear do we 672 00:32:45,319 --> 00:32:50,839 need to continue this for another meeting or are we good? 673 00:32:50,839 --> 00:32:53,680 Okay. So we have a 674 00:32:53,680 --> 00:32:56,759 Commissioner Roselle would you restate your motion and we 675 00:32:56,759 --> 00:32:57,640 'll see if we can get a 676 00:32:57,640 --> 00:33:02,880 second on it again. Sure I move for approval for the March 677 00:33:02,880 --> 00:33:04,319 22nd minutes with 678 00:33:04,319 --> 00:33:08,890 the change on page 5 line 35 to read Commissioner Hutzbeth 679 00:33:08,890 --> 00:33:10,000 stated he does 680 00:33:10,000 --> 00:33:14,160 agree with the rezone and striking the it doesn't belong in 681 00:33:14,160 --> 00:33:15,599 this area. Great. 682 00:33:15,599 --> 00:33:19,319 You'd like to second again for Commissioner Beck. 683 00:33:19,319 --> 00:33:20,400 Commissioner Beck for a 684 00:33:20,400 --> 00:33:24,519 second this time. I second. All right we have a first and a 685 00:33:24,519 --> 00:33:26,559 second. Any discussion 686 00:33:26,559 --> 00:33:30,099 further discussion on this item? Seeing none we'll call for 687 00:33:30,099 --> 00:33:33,000 a vote on the board. 688 00:33:40,000 --> 00:33:46,640 Motion carries five with one recuse. Commissioner Taylor. I 689 00:33:46,640 --> 00:33:48,319 move approval of 690 00:33:48,319 --> 00:33:53,079 our April 12th minutes. Okay. Chair will second. Any 691 00:33:53,079 --> 00:33:57,400 discussion? Seeing none call 692 00:33:57,400 --> 00:34:00,200 for a vote on board. 693 00:34:07,240 --> 00:34:12,690 The motion carries six to zero. It will take us to our 694 00:34:12,690 --> 00:34:14,280 consent agenda. 695 00:34:14,760 --> 00:34:18,880 Commissioner Beck. I move we approve the consent agenda. 696 00:34:18,880 --> 00:34:20,760 Okay. Commissioner Roselle. 697 00:34:20,760 --> 00:34:24,820 Second. Okay. We have a first and a second for approval. 698 00:34:24,820 --> 00:34:25,840 Any discussion on the 699 00:34:25,840 --> 00:34:38,519 consent agenda? Seeing none I'll call for a vote on board. 700 00:34:38,519 --> 00:34:41,719 The motion carries six 701 00:34:41,719 --> 00:34:46,090 to zero which will move us to our public hearing section. I 702 00:34:46,090 --> 00:34:47,880 'm going to open the 703 00:34:47,880 --> 00:34:55,250 public hearing for item A S17-0002 and I will call on Haley 704 00:34:55,250 --> 00:34:55,760 for a 705 00:34:55,760 --> 00:34:59,000 presentation of this item. 706 00:35:18,719 --> 00:35:19,159 All right good evening this is case S17-2 for Denton Calv 707 00:35:19,159 --> 00:35:25,360 ary Academy. The 708 00:35:25,360 --> 00:35:27,860 request was to hold a public hearing and consider a request 709 00:35:27,860 --> 00:35:28,760 by the Denton Bible 710 00:35:28,760 --> 00:35:28,760 Church for a specific use permit to allow a high school use 711 00:35:28,760 --> 00:35:33,119 on approximately 712 00:35:33,119 --> 00:35:33,119 13.7 acres. The property is located at the southwest corner 713 00:35:33,119 --> 00:35:38,159 of the East 714 00:35:38,159 --> 00:35:38,159 University Drive and Nottingham Drive intersection and it 715 00:35:38,159 --> 00:35:41,719 is shown in yellow on 716 00:35:41,719 --> 00:35:47,510 this map. As I mentioned the property is approximately 13.7 717 00:35:47,510 --> 00:35:48,760 acres total. It has 718 00:35:48,760 --> 00:35:53,119 frontage on University Drive, Nottingham Drive and Mingo 719 00:35:53,119 --> 00:35:55,320 Road. The site plan that 720 00:35:55,320 --> 00:35:57,809 was included in your backup will go through briefly. A 721 00:35:57,809 --> 00:35:59,440 little history on the 722 00:35:59,440 --> 00:36:03,679 property in 1999 and ordinance for an SUP was approved to 723 00:36:03,679 --> 00:36:05,039 allow Denton Calvary 724 00:36:05,039 --> 00:36:08,170 Academy to operate a private elementary through high school 725 00:36:08,170 --> 00:36:09,480 . Specifically the 726 00:36:09,480 --> 00:36:12,570 high school use being the reason for the SUP and the four 727 00:36:12,570 --> 00:36:14,320 buildings on lot 1R 728 00:36:14,320 --> 00:36:18,940 that are outlined in green on the map. The proposal now is 729 00:36:18,940 --> 00:36:20,480 to expand this use 730 00:36:20,480 --> 00:36:23,650 specifically the high school being the portion that 731 00:36:23,650 --> 00:36:26,159 requires the SUP onto all 732 00:36:26,159 --> 00:36:28,380 of the buildings that are outlined in orange on the 733 00:36:28,380 --> 00:36:29,599 remainder of the property. 734 00:36:29,599 --> 00:36:33,760 Just a note for clarification in the NRMU zoning district 735 00:36:33,760 --> 00:36:34,679 the elementary and 736 00:36:34,679 --> 00:36:37,449 middle school uses are permitted by right so the high 737 00:36:37,449 --> 00:36:38,119 school use at the 738 00:36:38,119 --> 00:36:42,340 school is the specific aspect that requires this SUP. 739 00:36:42,340 --> 00:36:43,880 Everything shown on 740 00:36:43,880 --> 00:36:46,650 the site plan is existing on the site today and the 741 00:36:46,650 --> 00:36:47,960 applicant at this time is 742 00:36:47,960 --> 00:36:50,929 proposing no changes to the parking landscaping or building 743 00:36:50,929 --> 00:36:51,719 footprints that 744 00:36:51,719 --> 00:36:56,280 are shown here on the site plan. To give you an idea of 745 00:36:56,280 --> 00:36:58,000 what's in the area the 746 00:36:58,000 --> 00:37:01,110 subject property as I mentioned is zoned NRMU. Currently 747 00:37:01,110 --> 00:37:02,519 the northern portion is 748 00:37:02,519 --> 00:37:06,139 Denton Calvary Academy. Denton Bible Church owns and 749 00:37:06,139 --> 00:37:08,000 operates uses on the 750 00:37:08,000 --> 00:37:12,230 remainder of the subject property. To the north and west is 751 00:37:12,230 --> 00:37:13,599 an NR3 zoning 752 00:37:13,599 --> 00:37:16,809 district with single-family homes developed and to the east 753 00:37:16,809 --> 00:37:17,239 across 754 00:37:17,239 --> 00:37:20,530 Nottingham Drive is the CMG district where Denton Bible 755 00:37:20,530 --> 00:37:21,400 Church has its 756 00:37:21,400 --> 00:37:26,320 primary campus. Expanding a little bit further out we 757 00:37:26,320 --> 00:37:27,760 gained some retail and 758 00:37:27,760 --> 00:37:31,210 restaurant uses north of the property along University as 759 00:37:31,210 --> 00:37:32,159 well as a church 760 00:37:32,159 --> 00:37:35,639 located across there in the NR3 district. The community 761 00:37:35,639 --> 00:37:37,079 garden is located on the 762 00:37:37,079 --> 00:37:41,139 south side of Mingo Road in an NR2 district as well as some 763 00:37:41,139 --> 00:37:41,440 railroad 764 00:37:41,440 --> 00:37:47,119 tracks and then further south a multifamily property. In 765 00:37:47,119 --> 00:37:48,840 general you can 766 00:37:48,840 --> 00:37:52,150 see this area or this portion of town has a wide variety of 767 00:37:52,150 --> 00:37:53,039 residential 768 00:37:53,039 --> 00:37:57,110 institutional and commercial uses as well as a wide array 769 00:37:57,110 --> 00:37:58,079 of zoning districts 770 00:37:58,079 --> 00:38:01,079 ranging from residential to getting into some employment 771 00:38:01,079 --> 00:38:02,199 centers and industrial 772 00:38:02,199 --> 00:38:08,360 uses off to the east. This area of town is designated by 773 00:38:08,360 --> 00:38:10,000 the Denton Plan 2030 and 774 00:38:10,000 --> 00:38:13,449 the future land use map as an area of community mixed use. 775 00:38:13,449 --> 00:38:14,880 This designation is 776 00:38:14,880 --> 00:38:17,650 intended to promote a mixture of uses predominantly 777 00:38:17,650 --> 00:38:18,679 commercial uses with 778 00:38:18,679 --> 00:38:22,210 supporting residential and service uses. It's intended to 779 00:38:22,210 --> 00:38:23,239 be an area that we 780 00:38:23,239 --> 00:38:26,550 promote connectivity and multimodal transportation as well 781 00:38:26,550 --> 00:38:27,400 as a mixture of 782 00:38:27,400 --> 00:38:31,199 uses both vertically and horizontally and in this 783 00:38:31,199 --> 00:38:33,199 designation schools, places of 784 00:38:33,199 --> 00:38:35,550 worship and parks are all permitted by rights so this use 785 00:38:35,550 --> 00:38:36,400 is consistent with 786 00:38:36,400 --> 00:38:40,920 the future land use designation. To look at the mobility 787 00:38:40,920 --> 00:38:42,280 plan we have University 788 00:38:42,280 --> 00:38:45,250 Drive on the north which is a primary arterial, Nottingham 789 00:38:45,250 --> 00:38:46,360 Drive to the east is 790 00:38:46,360 --> 00:38:49,809 considered a collector and then Mingo Road to the south is 791 00:38:49,809 --> 00:38:50,440 a secondary 792 00:38:50,440 --> 00:38:54,300 arterial. In keeping with that multimodal transportation 793 00:38:54,300 --> 00:38:55,159 that the future land use 794 00:38:55,159 --> 00:38:57,989 calls for there are existing and or proposed bike routes on 795 00:38:57,989 --> 00:38:58,519 all of the 796 00:38:58,519 --> 00:39:02,199 adjoining streets as well as bus routes through DCTA on 797 00:39:02,199 --> 00:39:03,679 University and Mingo 798 00:39:03,679 --> 00:39:09,280 Road. To look a little more specifically at what's on the 799 00:39:09,280 --> 00:39:11,159 site today you can see 800 00:39:11,159 --> 00:39:14,949 here all the existing buildings and parking there the 801 00:39:14,949 --> 00:39:16,960 entire site is in 802 00:39:16,960 --> 00:39:19,730 compliance with the minimum 20% landscape area that's 803 00:39:19,730 --> 00:39:20,199 required by the 804 00:39:20,199 --> 00:39:23,469 zoning district and I wanted to point out that the original 805 00:39:23,469 --> 00:39:24,559 SUP ordinance 806 00:39:24,559 --> 00:39:28,429 for Denton Calvary Academy found that the existing landsca 807 00:39:28,429 --> 00:39:29,519 ping on site was 808 00:39:29,519 --> 00:39:31,920 sufficient to provide compatibility between the school and 809 00:39:31,920 --> 00:39:32,639 the surrounding 810 00:39:32,639 --> 00:39:37,480 neighborhood. Just to go through some site photos this 811 00:39:37,480 --> 00:39:38,360 picture is looking 812 00:39:38,360 --> 00:39:42,679 towards the west at the existing campus these are some of 813 00:39:42,679 --> 00:39:43,760 the buildings located 814 00:39:43,760 --> 00:39:46,980 on the east side of the property along Nottingham Drive and 815 00:39:46,980 --> 00:39:47,960 then these being 816 00:39:47,960 --> 00:39:51,539 the southernmost buildings located down on lot four of the 817 00:39:51,539 --> 00:39:52,719 property and this 818 00:39:52,719 --> 00:39:55,539 photo also shows some of the landscaping you can see they 819 00:39:55,539 --> 00:39:55,800 have 820 00:39:55,800 --> 00:39:58,920 landscaping islands trees to provide canopy coverage for 821 00:39:58,920 --> 00:39:59,920 the parking lot as 822 00:39:59,920 --> 00:40:02,690 is required in the DDC and then towards the back of the 823 00:40:02,690 --> 00:40:03,840 photo you can see the 824 00:40:03,840 --> 00:40:06,659 western property boundary has a substantial amount of 825 00:40:06,659 --> 00:40:07,519 landscaping to 826 00:40:07,519 --> 00:40:11,840 provide a buffer between the school and the residential 827 00:40:11,840 --> 00:40:13,519 uses and then this photo 828 00:40:13,519 --> 00:40:16,289 is intended to show the screening that's provided for the 829 00:40:16,289 --> 00:40:17,039 parking lot there are 830 00:40:17,039 --> 00:40:20,059 hedgerows and trees existing all along the perimeter of the 831 00:40:20,059 --> 00:40:21,000 site that screen 832 00:40:21,000 --> 00:40:25,710 the parking from the adjacent right-of-way. Notification 833 00:40:25,710 --> 00:40:26,480 was sent out 834 00:40:26,480 --> 00:40:30,139 about this request we received three responses two in favor 835 00:40:30,139 --> 00:40:31,079 that were from 836 00:40:31,079 --> 00:40:33,889 the neighborhood to the south and one in opposition that 837 00:40:33,889 --> 00:40:34,480 was from the 838 00:40:34,480 --> 00:40:39,079 neighborhood to the north across University Drive. Staff is 839 00:40:39,079 --> 00:40:40,000 recommending 840 00:40:40,000 --> 00:40:42,769 approval of this request based on our land use analysis we 841 00:40:42,769 --> 00:40:44,119 found that it meets 842 00:40:44,119 --> 00:40:47,090 all of the requirements for SUP approval outlined in subch 843 00:40:47,090 --> 00:40:49,760 apter 6 of the DDC. The 844 00:40:49,760 --> 00:40:52,869 use is already existing on a portion of the property and 845 00:40:52,869 --> 00:40:53,760 was found to be 846 00:40:53,760 --> 00:40:57,420 compatible under the original SUP and the expansion of this 847 00:40:57,420 --> 00:40:58,480 use will be onto a 848 00:40:58,480 --> 00:41:01,250 fully developed site as you saw on the site plan and they 849 00:41:01,250 --> 00:41:02,000 're proposing no 850 00:41:02,000 --> 00:41:05,050 changes to that at this time and the use is also consistent 851 00:41:05,050 --> 00:41:06,159 with the Denton plan 852 00:41:06,159 --> 00:41:11,039 2030. Staff is recommending approval with two conditions 853 00:41:11,039 --> 00:41:12,360 the first being that the 854 00:41:12,360 --> 00:41:15,329 use be restricted to the existing buildings on the four 855 00:41:15,329 --> 00:41:16,239 lots that you saw 856 00:41:16,239 --> 00:41:19,329 on the site plan. We are also proposing that the landsca 857 00:41:19,329 --> 00:41:20,360 ping coverage and 858 00:41:20,360 --> 00:41:23,349 parking count be maintained as is reflected on the site 859 00:41:23,349 --> 00:41:24,320 plan and that any 860 00:41:24,320 --> 00:41:28,380 changes to what is shown on the site plan be approved to 861 00:41:28,380 --> 00:41:28,840 require approval 862 00:41:28,840 --> 00:41:33,070 through an amendment of the SUP. Our second criteria being 863 00:41:33,070 --> 00:41:34,719 that we recommend 864 00:41:34,719 --> 00:41:38,400 ordinance 99277 be repealed and replaced by a new ordinance 865 00:41:38,400 --> 00:41:38,840 that would be 866 00:41:38,840 --> 00:41:42,739 approved by City Council for this case so that only one SUP 867 00:41:42,739 --> 00:41:44,019 controls the 868 00:41:44,019 --> 00:41:46,840 operation of the high school use on the property and I can 869 00:41:46,840 --> 00:41:47,559 stand for any 870 00:41:47,559 --> 00:41:50,039 questions at this time. I have a couple questions 871 00:41:50,039 --> 00:41:51,360 Commissioner Beck. Thank You 872 00:41:51,360 --> 00:41:56,650 Chair. Haley just for clarification concerning Commissioner 873 00:41:56,650 --> 00:41:57,119 Taylor's 874 00:41:57,119 --> 00:42:01,280 concern regarding that impulot that undeveloped lot there 875 00:42:01,280 --> 00:42:03,159 on Mingo. If the 876 00:42:03,159 --> 00:42:06,860 Academy decides to build a facility on that that would 877 00:42:06,860 --> 00:42:09,280 generate another SUP to 878 00:42:09,280 --> 00:42:12,360 amend this SUP is that correct? With the existing 879 00:42:12,360 --> 00:42:14,239 recommendation language it would 880 00:42:14,239 --> 00:42:17,059 be as we indicated previously though staff would be amen 881 00:42:17,059 --> 00:42:17,960 able to altering 882 00:42:17,960 --> 00:42:22,019 that language to allow them to develop permitted uses on 883 00:42:22,019 --> 00:42:23,400 lot four if it were to 884 00:42:23,400 --> 00:42:25,710 be at the high school use or another use that requires an 885 00:42:25,710 --> 00:42:26,800 SUP then we would still 886 00:42:26,800 --> 00:42:29,920 require the SUP approval. We'd have to come back through. 887 00:42:29,920 --> 00:42:32,960 Okay. Commissioner Roseau. 888 00:42:32,960 --> 00:42:37,039 Thank You Chair. One of the the second condition says 889 00:42:37,039 --> 00:42:38,800 ordinance 99277 must be 890 00:42:38,800 --> 00:42:40,429 repealed and replaced. There's my understanding work 891 00:42:40,429 --> 00:42:41,559 session that would be 892 00:42:41,559 --> 00:42:45,880 replaced completely with this new SUP is that correct? Yes. 893 00:42:45,880 --> 00:42:47,119 So in section one of 894 00:42:47,119 --> 00:42:51,000 the current ordinance there's four limitations that would 895 00:42:51,000 --> 00:42:51,719 be effectively 896 00:42:51,719 --> 00:42:56,619 removed. Student maximum over students hours operation but 897 00:42:56,619 --> 00:42:57,199 then the last one 898 00:42:57,199 --> 00:43:00,059 says that any change in light on the property shall be 899 00:43:00,059 --> 00:43:01,199 designed and maintained 900 00:43:01,199 --> 00:43:04,170 so as not to shine on otherwise or otherwise disturb 901 00:43:04,170 --> 00:43:05,039 residential property. 902 00:43:05,039 --> 00:43:07,250 If that's removed is there any provision and protection 903 00:43:07,250 --> 00:43:08,199 from the neighborhood 904 00:43:08,199 --> 00:43:12,559 under in our MU zoning that would effectively help with 905 00:43:12,559 --> 00:43:13,480 that light 906 00:43:13,480 --> 00:43:17,219 treatment? Yes sir that's actually a provision as well in 907 00:43:17,219 --> 00:43:18,159 sub chapter 13 of 908 00:43:18,159 --> 00:43:20,650 the DDC there are lighting provisions that require all 909 00:43:20,650 --> 00:43:21,519 light be directed 910 00:43:21,519 --> 00:43:24,269 downwards so as not to diffuse on other properties as well 911 00:43:24,269 --> 00:43:25,159 as limitations on the 912 00:43:25,159 --> 00:43:28,780 amount of light that can exist at the perimeter of a 913 00:43:28,780 --> 00:43:30,599 property so any changes 914 00:43:30,599 --> 00:43:34,400 would require an SUP and site plan amendment and that would 915 00:43:34,400 --> 00:43:35,199 be taken care 916 00:43:35,199 --> 00:43:37,969 of inherently through the DDC requirements for lighting. 917 00:43:37,969 --> 00:43:38,400 Okay thank you. 918 00:43:38,400 --> 00:43:44,380 I have a question to follow up from our work session since 919 00:43:44,380 --> 00:43:45,239 we don't have the 920 00:43:45,239 --> 00:43:48,010 actual SUP before us it will be done at City Council's I 921 00:43:48,010 --> 00:43:49,119 believe what you said 922 00:43:49,119 --> 00:43:52,090 in work session would you give us the the numbers for the 923 00:43:52,090 --> 00:43:53,119 number of students 924 00:43:53,119 --> 00:43:55,400 that will be approved as it moves forward to City Council 925 00:43:55,400 --> 00:43:56,039 what's been 926 00:43:56,039 --> 00:43:58,860 presented to us as well as the parking places so we'll all 927 00:43:58,860 --> 00:43:59,840 have that stated on 928 00:43:59,840 --> 00:44:03,519 the record here. Yes sir so the parking count the existing 929 00:44:03,519 --> 00:44:04,159 parking count is 930 00:44:04,159 --> 00:44:07,610 outlined on the site plan I believe it is 694 spaces that 931 00:44:07,610 --> 00:44:10,159 are existing and the 932 00:44:10,159 --> 00:44:12,929 number of students was indicated by the applicant that they 933 00:44:12,929 --> 00:44:13,599 believe they could 934 00:44:13,599 --> 00:44:16,469 hold up to 1,500 students but that number is not nailed 935 00:44:16,469 --> 00:44:17,300 down on the site plan at 936 00:44:17,300 --> 00:44:21,190 this time. Will that go into the SUP that this is good up 937 00:44:21,190 --> 00:44:22,679 to 1,500 students in? 938 00:44:22,679 --> 00:44:25,650 Staff wasn't intending for that too certainly something 939 00:44:25,650 --> 00:44:26,440 that you all could 940 00:44:26,440 --> 00:44:28,400 consider if you wanted to add that as an additional 941 00:44:28,400 --> 00:44:29,719 condition. Is it open-ended 942 00:44:29,719 --> 00:44:32,199 then so they can have as many students if there's not a 943 00:44:32,199 --> 00:44:33,760 limitation? Yes it would 944 00:44:33,760 --> 00:44:36,019 be as many students as they could hold within the existing 945 00:44:36,019 --> 00:44:37,119 buildings. So for 946 00:44:37,119 --> 00:44:39,929 their benefit if we don't put a number on it and they want 947 00:44:39,929 --> 00:44:41,079 to exceed it it 948 00:44:41,079 --> 00:44:44,159 still falls under the SUP they can go as high as they would 949 00:44:44,159 --> 00:44:45,199 like? Yes sir. Great 950 00:44:45,199 --> 00:44:51,639 we'll leave it like it is. Any other questions for staff? 951 00:44:51,639 --> 00:44:55,239 Thank you Hamie. 952 00:44:55,239 --> 00:44:59,130 This is a public hearing that one card to speak and I've 953 00:44:59,130 --> 00:45:00,639 got a number of cards 954 00:45:00,639 --> 00:45:04,159 and I'll read into the record. Not requesting to speak our 955 00:45:04,159 --> 00:45:05,239 first speaker is 956 00:45:05,239 --> 00:45:14,610 Stacey Baxter. Good evening I'm Stacey Baxter the principal 957 00:45:14,610 --> 00:45:15,800 at Denton Calgary 958 00:45:15,800 --> 00:45:18,969 Academy and I thank you for the opportunity to speak to you 959 00:45:18,969 --> 00:45:19,440 this evening. 960 00:45:19,440 --> 00:45:23,969 I'm here to explain to you the benefit of our school to the 961 00:45:23,969 --> 00:45:25,400 community to the 962 00:45:25,400 --> 00:45:28,889 community of Denton and just this year alone our high 963 00:45:28,889 --> 00:45:30,519 school students 9th to 964 00:45:30,519 --> 00:45:34,000 12th grade have clocked over 4,000 hours in community 965 00:45:34,000 --> 00:45:35,800 service. As a Christian 966 00:45:35,800 --> 00:45:39,000 school we're committed to doing good in the Lord's name and 967 00:45:39,000 --> 00:45:39,800 it is a requirement 968 00:45:39,800 --> 00:45:43,010 but you should know that our students go well above what is 969 00:45:43,010 --> 00:45:44,840 required and are 970 00:45:44,840 --> 00:45:49,000 frequently logging many extra hours above and beyond. 971 00:45:49,000 --> 00:45:50,679 Another benefit to the 972 00:45:50,679 --> 00:45:53,190 community I wanted to share with you is that I often get 973 00:45:53,190 --> 00:45:54,159 phone calls and/or 974 00:45:54,159 --> 00:45:57,469 emails from local businesses and business owners who tell 975 00:45:57,469 --> 00:45:58,280 me they would 976 00:45:58,280 --> 00:46:02,599 like to hire employ my students in particular high school 977 00:46:02,599 --> 00:46:03,679 of working age 978 00:46:03,679 --> 00:46:06,690 because of their high character and their commitment and 979 00:46:06,690 --> 00:46:07,440 that they're 980 00:46:07,440 --> 00:46:11,510 reliable employees so they often call me and say I'm 981 00:46:11,510 --> 00:46:13,159 looking to hire and who do 982 00:46:13,159 --> 00:46:16,219 you have that is willing so that's another good thing. 983 00:46:16,219 --> 00:46:17,480 Recently I received an 984 00:46:17,480 --> 00:46:22,630 email from a person who was a retired military and observed 985 00:46:22,630 --> 00:46:23,659 some of the 986 00:46:23,659 --> 00:46:27,739 behavior of our high school students after a baseball game 987 00:46:27,739 --> 00:46:29,000 and took the time 988 00:46:29,000 --> 00:46:32,449 to email the school to compliment our students and their 989 00:46:32,449 --> 00:46:33,800 character and he said 990 00:46:33,800 --> 00:46:38,159 that it has renewed his belief that in the youth of today 991 00:46:38,159 --> 00:46:39,159 and greatly 992 00:46:39,159 --> 00:46:42,159 encouraged him one of our students extended his hand and 993 00:46:42,159 --> 00:46:43,119 said thank you for 994 00:46:43,119 --> 00:46:46,639 your service to our country and he was so moved that he 995 00:46:46,639 --> 00:46:48,440 went to our website to 996 00:46:48,440 --> 00:46:50,920 find out my name so that he could let me know that that 997 00:46:50,920 --> 00:46:51,760 happened and that it 998 00:46:51,760 --> 00:46:55,219 encouraged him greatly. We have been on this property for 999 00:46:55,219 --> 00:46:56,599 18 years as you have 1000 00:46:56,599 --> 00:47:00,190 heard and we have expanded we've had consistent growth I 1001 00:47:00,190 --> 00:47:01,760 think you should 1002 00:47:01,760 --> 00:47:05,039 know that that is due to the the partnership the very very 1003 00:47:05,039 --> 00:47:05,400 close 1004 00:47:05,400 --> 00:47:08,260 partnership that we have with our parents it is a true 1005 00:47:08,260 --> 00:47:09,159 partnership between 1006 00:47:09,159 --> 00:47:12,739 the home and the school and so the accountability is very 1007 00:47:12,739 --> 00:47:13,880 high and therefore 1008 00:47:13,880 --> 00:47:18,889 I can ensure you all that we will continue to be a benefit 1009 00:47:18,889 --> 00:47:19,599 to this 1010 00:47:19,599 --> 00:47:23,670 community. We want to reach out and give back as a matter 1011 00:47:23,670 --> 00:47:24,360 of fact when you had 1012 00:47:24,360 --> 00:47:26,800 your map up there I want you to know that I personally with 1013 00:47:26,800 --> 00:47:27,559 the students have 1014 00:47:27,559 --> 00:47:31,880 gone along Nottingham and Mingo to pick up trash and so we 1015 00:47:31,880 --> 00:47:33,960 want to be leaving it 1016 00:47:33,960 --> 00:47:37,119 better than we found it but as we expand and and become 1017 00:47:37,119 --> 00:47:38,480 owners that commitment 1018 00:47:38,480 --> 00:47:41,469 stands and so I wanted to give you my word on that. It's an 1019 00:47:41,469 --> 00:47:43,539 excellent school we 1020 00:47:43,539 --> 00:47:46,380 have received many many awards for our academics fine arts 1021 00:47:46,380 --> 00:47:47,360 and athletics and 1022 00:47:47,360 --> 00:47:50,130 art a fully accredited school and I just really thank you 1023 00:47:50,130 --> 00:47:51,920 for the opportunity for 1024 00:47:51,920 --> 00:47:54,800 me to speak to you tonight about the benefit of Denton Calv 1025 00:47:54,800 --> 00:47:55,760 ary in your 1026 00:47:55,760 --> 00:48:01,280 community in my community thank you. I'll second all your 1027 00:48:01,280 --> 00:48:02,639 comments there's some 1028 00:48:02,639 --> 00:48:05,519 great students out there I know a lot of the students and 1029 00:48:05,519 --> 00:48:07,119 the families it's a 1030 00:48:07,119 --> 00:48:10,440 great school and we're glad to have you here before us and 1031 00:48:10,440 --> 00:48:11,119 hopefully get you an 1032 00:48:11,119 --> 00:48:19,750 SUP thank you. Anybody else that would like to speak it's a 1033 00:48:19,750 --> 00:48:20,679 public hearing so 1034 00:48:20,679 --> 00:48:25,599 feel free and otherwise I'll read cards into the record 1035 00:48:25,599 --> 00:48:28,199 here. I have Everett 1036 00:48:28,199 --> 00:48:35,119 Newland in support I have Darren Thompson in support I have 1037 00:48:35,119 --> 00:48:36,360 Ryan Sawyer 1038 00:48:36,360 --> 00:48:43,559 support Zach Rozelle in support Pat Smith in support 1039 00:48:43,559 --> 00:48:49,630 Jenny Newland in support Max Robertson in support Perla Mc 1040 00:48:49,630 --> 00:48:51,159 Bean in support and 1041 00:48:51,159 --> 00:48:55,480 Courtney Robertson in support. Again this is a public 1042 00:48:55,480 --> 00:48:57,039 hearing anybody who would 1043 00:48:57,039 --> 00:49:01,199 like to speak on this item please come forward at this time 1044 00:49:01,199 --> 00:49:04,440 . Last call. Seeing 1045 00:49:04,440 --> 00:49:08,960 none I will close the public hearing and open the floor for 1046 00:49:08,960 --> 00:49:10,039 discussion. 1047 00:49:11,559 --> 00:49:17,429 Commissioner Rozelle. Commissioner Taylor makes the motion 1048 00:49:17,429 --> 00:49:17,880 I just wanted to 1049 00:49:17,880 --> 00:49:20,679 clarify with legal how that motion would be worded exactly 1050 00:49:20,679 --> 00:49:23,440 to exclude to make the 1051 00:49:23,440 --> 00:49:26,889 correction that staff suggested there's not limitation on 1052 00:49:26,889 --> 00:49:27,599 NRMU buildings. 1053 00:49:27,599 --> 00:49:34,400 You got it okay. Commissioner Tyler. I think I've got it 1054 00:49:34,400 --> 00:49:38,320 thank you chair so I 1055 00:49:38,320 --> 00:49:42,420 move we recommend approval of this SUP with staff's 1056 00:49:42,420 --> 00:49:43,920 conditions and an 1057 00:49:43,920 --> 00:49:47,400 additional clarification my final sentence added to 1058 00:49:47,400 --> 00:49:49,719 condition number one 1059 00:49:49,719 --> 00:49:52,489 currently it reads any changes to building footprints 1060 00:49:52,489 --> 00:49:53,320 parking counts 1061 00:49:53,320 --> 00:49:55,820 parking lot layouts or landscaping area must be approved by 1062 00:49:55,820 --> 00:49:56,880 amending the SUP 1063 00:49:56,880 --> 00:50:04,719 say on lots one two and three lot four are can develop any 1064 00:50:04,719 --> 00:50:06,159 with any permitted 1065 00:50:06,159 --> 00:50:11,610 use in accordance with debt and development code meeting 1066 00:50:11,610 --> 00:50:11,679 debt and 1067 00:50:11,679 --> 00:50:17,050 development code standards legal does that sound like that 1068 00:50:17,050 --> 00:50:20,320 okay. Commissioner 1069 00:50:20,320 --> 00:50:30,920 Rozelle. I second. Any discussion? Seeing none I'll call 1070 00:50:30,920 --> 00:50:33,559 for a vote on board. 1071 00:50:38,920 --> 00:50:43,800 Motion carries six to zero congratulations. 1072 00:50:49,280 --> 00:50:53,599 I'll give the room a few minutes to clear. 1073 00:51:09,199 --> 00:51:15,059 At this time I will open the public hearing for item B Z 17 1074 00:51:15,059 --> 00:51:15,559 - zero zero zero 1075 00:51:15,559 --> 00:51:19,710 zero seven and I will call on Haley Zygursky for 1076 00:51:19,710 --> 00:51:21,079 presentation. 1077 00:51:29,559 --> 00:51:35,750 All right so this is case Z 17 7 for CST corner store. The 1078 00:51:35,750 --> 00:51:37,199 request was to hold a 1079 00:51:37,199 --> 00:51:40,170 public hearing and consider a rezoning request by Vanda 1080 00:51:40,170 --> 00:51:41,239 Smith developers to 1081 00:51:41,239 --> 00:51:44,010 rezone approximately 0.8 acres from neighborhood 1082 00:51:44,010 --> 00:51:44,920 residential mixed use 1083 00:51:44,920 --> 00:51:48,090 district to CMG district. The property is located on the 1084 00:51:48,090 --> 00:51:49,159 north side of Hobson 1085 00:51:49,159 --> 00:51:52,880 Lane approximately 340 feet east of Country Club Road. As I 1086 00:51:52,880 --> 00:51:54,360 mentioned the 1087 00:51:54,360 --> 00:51:57,199 property is just under one acre and it has about 100 feet 1088 00:51:57,199 --> 00:51:58,360 of frontage on Hobson 1089 00:51:58,360 --> 00:52:03,219 Lane. You can see here looking at the property and the 1090 00:52:03,219 --> 00:52:04,519 zoning map that 1091 00:52:04,519 --> 00:52:07,289 currently the subject property is an isolated area of NRMU 1092 00:52:07,289 --> 00:52:08,320 district. You may 1093 00:52:08,320 --> 00:52:11,360 remember we recently had a request and the rezoning was 1094 00:52:11,360 --> 00:52:12,320 approved for the 1095 00:52:12,320 --> 00:52:16,380 property directly to the east rezoning that from NRMU to CM 1096 00:52:16,380 --> 00:52:18,199 G and as a part of 1097 00:52:18,199 --> 00:52:20,969 that that rendered the subject property an isolated zoning 1098 00:52:20,969 --> 00:52:21,840 district so staff had 1099 00:52:21,840 --> 00:52:23,949 recommended at that time that we proceed with rezoning the 1100 00:52:23,949 --> 00:52:24,519 remainder of 1101 00:52:24,519 --> 00:52:28,980 that to provide two zoning districts on this larger parent 1102 00:52:28,980 --> 00:52:30,599 tract and facilitate 1103 00:52:30,599 --> 00:52:33,610 more cohesive development of the site. So immediately adjo 1104 00:52:33,610 --> 00:52:34,760 ining the property to 1105 00:52:34,760 --> 00:52:37,579 the east as I've mentioned or to the west I'm sorry we have 1106 00:52:37,579 --> 00:52:38,239 a CMG district 1107 00:52:38,239 --> 00:52:41,690 currently vacant land with a single-family home on the 1108 00:52:41,690 --> 00:52:42,559 north side. To 1109 00:52:42,559 --> 00:52:45,409 the north and east of the property we have in our sixth 1110 00:52:45,409 --> 00:52:46,679 district primarily 1111 00:52:46,679 --> 00:52:50,239 vacant property with some single-family uses to the north. 1112 00:52:50,239 --> 00:52:51,239 Across Hobson Lane is 1113 00:52:51,239 --> 00:52:55,119 NR2 district with single-family uses and then further to 1114 00:52:55,119 --> 00:52:56,280 the west along Country 1115 00:52:56,280 --> 00:53:00,400 Club Road we have NRMU district developed with offices, a 1116 00:53:00,400 --> 00:53:01,119 fueling station 1117 00:53:01,119 --> 00:53:05,449 and some multifamily development. Extending further out you 1118 00:53:05,449 --> 00:53:06,360 see there's a 1119 00:53:06,360 --> 00:53:09,130 wider mix of zoning districts in this area specifically 1120 00:53:09,130 --> 00:53:09,840 across Fort Worth 1121 00:53:09,840 --> 00:53:12,610 Drive there's a mixture of employment center and industrial 1122 00:53:12,610 --> 00:53:13,159 zoning districts 1123 00:53:13,159 --> 00:53:16,610 with uses such as manufactured housing there's a landsca 1124 00:53:16,610 --> 00:53:17,679 ping company with a 1125 00:53:17,679 --> 00:53:20,440 large property over there as well as some other commercial 1126 00:53:20,440 --> 00:53:20,840 uses such as a 1127 00:53:20,840 --> 00:53:25,059 veterinarian's office. And you can see again the NR6 1128 00:53:25,059 --> 00:53:26,320 district and NR2 district 1129 00:53:26,320 --> 00:53:29,210 extend further to the north and south respectively and then 1130 00:53:29,210 --> 00:53:30,159 a continuation of 1131 00:53:30,159 --> 00:53:34,920 the NRMU district to the southwest. Looking at this general 1132 00:53:34,920 --> 00:53:35,840 area of town you 1133 00:53:35,840 --> 00:53:38,710 can see it's a wide variety of zonings a mixture of 1134 00:53:38,710 --> 00:53:40,159 industrial commercial 1135 00:53:40,159 --> 00:53:45,730 residential uses throughout the area. The future land use 1136 00:53:45,730 --> 00:53:47,559 for this larger area of 1137 00:53:47,559 --> 00:53:50,360 the city along Fort Worth Drive and Country Club and Hobson 1138 00:53:50,360 --> 00:53:51,000 specifically 1139 00:53:51,000 --> 00:53:54,309 where the property is is designated as community mixed use 1140 00:53:54,309 --> 00:53:55,159 by the future land 1141 00:53:55,159 --> 00:53:58,329 use map so again this area is intended to promote mixture 1142 00:53:58,329 --> 00:53:59,360 of uses predominantly 1143 00:53:59,360 --> 00:54:03,010 commercial with some supporting other services in 1144 00:54:03,010 --> 00:54:04,639 residential areas. Again 1145 00:54:04,639 --> 00:54:07,480 intended to accommodate multimodal transportation and 1146 00:54:07,480 --> 00:54:08,239 connectivity 1147 00:54:08,239 --> 00:54:11,329 throughout the area by providing a mixture of vertical and 1148 00:54:11,329 --> 00:54:12,280 horizontal uses 1149 00:54:12,280 --> 00:54:15,300 across these properties and typical developments would 1150 00:54:15,300 --> 00:54:16,519 include things such as 1151 00:54:16,519 --> 00:54:20,250 service stations, shopping centers, supermarkets, offices 1152 00:54:20,250 --> 00:54:21,280 and that variety of 1153 00:54:21,280 --> 00:54:26,440 commercial uses. Looking at the mobility plan Hobson Lane 1154 00:54:26,440 --> 00:54:27,360 and Country Club are 1155 00:54:27,360 --> 00:54:30,599 both designated as secondary arterial roads Fort Worth 1156 00:54:30,599 --> 00:54:31,840 Drive is a primary 1157 00:54:31,840 --> 00:54:34,190 arterial Fort Worth Drive and Country Club are both text 1158 00:54:34,190 --> 00:54:35,760 out roadways and 1159 00:54:35,760 --> 00:54:38,630 immediately adjacent to the subject property Hobson is 1160 00:54:38,630 --> 00:54:39,480 currently only 1161 00:54:39,480 --> 00:54:42,039 developed as a two-lane undivided roadway not yet built out 1162 00:54:42,039 --> 00:54:42,960 to full secondary 1163 00:54:42,960 --> 00:54:47,559 arterial standards. Notifications were sent about this 1164 00:54:47,559 --> 00:54:48,920 request we received two 1165 00:54:48,920 --> 00:54:53,409 written responses one in opposition and one in favor and 1166 00:54:53,409 --> 00:54:54,760 staff is recommending 1167 00:54:54,760 --> 00:54:58,059 approval based on our land use analysis it is compatible 1168 00:54:58,059 --> 00:54:59,199 with the surrounding 1169 00:54:59,199 --> 00:55:02,239 zoning and land uses it does eliminate that isolated zoning 1170 00:55:02,239 --> 00:55:03,199 district of NRMU 1171 00:55:03,199 --> 00:55:06,929 and it is consistent with the Denton plan 2030 designation 1172 00:55:06,929 --> 00:55:08,679 for this area and 1173 00:55:08,679 --> 00:55:13,909 with that I can answer any questions. Commissioner Roselle. 1174 00:55:13,909 --> 00:55:14,480 Thank you chair 1175 00:55:14,480 --> 00:55:19,679 just for clarification this property owner came to us two 1176 00:55:19,679 --> 00:55:20,599 meetings ago and 1177 00:55:20,599 --> 00:55:25,539 because of some zoning discrepancies is staff asked them to 1178 00:55:25,539 --> 00:55:27,079 come back just so we 1179 00:55:27,079 --> 00:55:29,559 could unify those two properties? Yes it was a staff 1180 00:55:29,559 --> 00:55:30,679 initiated request that they 1181 00:55:30,679 --> 00:55:33,550 were amenable to to promote or facilitate future 1182 00:55:33,550 --> 00:55:34,880 development under just 1183 00:55:34,880 --> 00:55:36,559 two zoning districts on the property. So this is more of a 1184 00:55:36,559 --> 00:55:39,440 just a follow-up from the left behind land from a couple 1185 00:55:39,440 --> 00:55:40,159 weeks ago? Yes sir. 1186 00:55:40,159 --> 00:55:50,320 Okay. Any other questions for staff? Thank you having again 1187 00:55:50,320 --> 00:55:51,000 this is a public 1188 00:55:51,000 --> 00:55:53,969 hearing anybody wishing to speak on this item please come 1189 00:55:53,969 --> 00:55:56,360 forward at this time. 1190 00:55:57,079 --> 00:56:09,889 Please state your name and address. Nathan Toon 3717 Merrim 1191 00:56:09,889 --> 00:56:11,679 ack Drive in Denton. 1192 00:56:11,679 --> 00:56:15,329 I'm a representative of Vanda Smith developers just here if 1193 00:56:15,329 --> 00:56:16,159 you have any 1194 00:56:16,159 --> 00:56:24,840 questions. Any questions for the applicant? Thank you. 1195 00:56:24,840 --> 00:56:27,610 Anybody else that would like to speak on this item please 1196 00:56:27,610 --> 00:56:28,360 come forward at this 1197 00:56:28,360 --> 00:56:34,679 time. Seeing none I'll close the public hearing and open 1198 00:56:34,679 --> 00:56:38,360 the floor for discussion. 1199 00:56:39,239 --> 00:56:49,099 Commissioner Roselle. I move to approve item Z 17 - 7. 1200 00:56:49,099 --> 00:56:49,800 Commissioner Hudsworth. 1201 00:56:49,800 --> 00:56:53,860 Second. Okay. I have a first and a second for approval. Any 1202 00:56:53,860 --> 00:56:55,239 further discussion? 1203 00:56:55,239 --> 00:56:58,969 Commissioner Ellis. Thank you chair. I am going to support 1204 00:56:58,969 --> 00:57:00,280 this tonight but I just 1205 00:57:00,280 --> 00:57:03,250 wanted to get on the record a few comments. I was against 1206 00:57:03,250 --> 00:57:04,199 this rezoning to 1207 00:57:04,199 --> 00:57:09,110 CMG the last time and and I am sorry that it passed but 1208 00:57:09,110 --> 00:57:11,079 being that it did pass it 1209 00:57:11,079 --> 00:57:13,849 doesn't make any sense for me to vote against this 1210 00:57:13,849 --> 00:57:14,960 particular tract of land 1211 00:57:14,960 --> 00:57:18,159 but I wanted to get that on the record as to why I am 1212 00:57:18,159 --> 00:57:19,800 voting for this tonight. 1213 00:57:19,800 --> 00:57:25,039 Thank you for the clarification. Any other discussion? 1214 00:57:25,039 --> 00:57:28,400 Seeing none I'll call 1215 00:57:28,400 --> 00:57:31,119 for a vote on board. 1216 00:57:36,400 --> 00:57:46,800 Motion carries 6 to 0. That will move us to our item C and 1217 00:57:46,800 --> 00:57:47,480 I'm going to ask for 1218 00:57:47,480 --> 00:57:51,119 just a clarification. We currently have a public hearing 1219 00:57:51,119 --> 00:57:52,480 open on that so we need 1220 00:57:52,480 --> 00:57:55,449 to call for anybody that would like to speak on that first 1221 00:57:55,449 --> 00:57:56,719 correct? We do not 1222 00:57:56,719 --> 00:58:02,639 have any cards to speak but yes you can make a call. I'm 1223 00:58:02,639 --> 00:58:04,079 going to just for a 1224 00:58:04,079 --> 00:58:11,199 point of order on our item Z 17 - 0002 C this item is still 1225 00:58:11,199 --> 00:58:12,559 open from our 1226 00:58:12,559 --> 00:58:15,440 previous meeting so if there's anyone here who would like 1227 00:58:15,440 --> 00:58:16,280 to speak on this 1228 00:58:16,280 --> 00:58:21,539 item please come forward at this time. Seeing none I will 1229 00:58:21,539 --> 00:58:22,920 close the public 1230 00:58:22,920 --> 00:58:28,079 hearing and Commissioner Taylor. I move we postpone this 1231 00:58:28,079 --> 00:58:29,599 item indefinitely until 1232 00:58:29,599 --> 00:58:35,119 such time as the applicant has held a community meeting. 1233 00:58:35,119 --> 00:58:36,519 Commissioner Ellis. 1234 00:58:36,519 --> 00:58:42,309 I will second. Okay Commissioner Rozelle. Just to clarify 1235 00:58:42,309 --> 00:58:43,960 is that a condition that 1236 00:58:43,960 --> 00:58:48,019 before they come back they have to have a community meeting 1237 00:58:48,019 --> 00:58:51,079 ? Yes. I believe that's 1238 00:58:51,079 --> 00:58:54,139 more informational is what Commissioner Taylor was trying 1239 00:58:54,139 --> 00:58:57,360 to say and our 1240 00:58:57,360 --> 00:59:00,130 postponement will be indefinitely until they bring it back. 1241 00:59:00,130 --> 00:59:01,639 Thank you. Well I 1242 00:59:01,639 --> 00:59:04,239 guess I was clear they don't have to submit proof that they 1243 00:59:04,239 --> 00:59:04,559 had a community 1244 00:59:04,559 --> 00:59:07,360 meeting to come back in the future? No that won't be a 1245 00:59:07,360 --> 00:59:08,639 condition of the motion. 1246 00:59:08,639 --> 00:59:12,719 Thank you. Does the chair need to ask for an amendment to 1247 00:59:12,719 --> 00:59:13,920 clarify that of the 1248 00:59:13,920 --> 00:59:19,960 motioner and a seconder? I understand that's clear I just 1249 00:59:19,960 --> 00:59:20,960 want a clarification I 1250 00:59:20,960 --> 00:59:28,570 suppose. That was the motion so shall I restate? Please 1251 00:59:28,570 --> 00:59:29,760 restate your motion with 1252 00:59:29,760 --> 00:59:35,000 the clarification. I move we postpone this public hearing 1253 00:59:35,000 --> 00:59:37,960 indefinitely. 1254 00:59:39,679 --> 00:59:46,309 Commissioner Ellis. Yes I will second. Second all right 1255 00:59:46,309 --> 00:59:47,679 good. Any further discussion or 1256 00:59:47,679 --> 00:59:52,079 clarification? Seeing none let's call for a vote on the 1257 00:59:52,079 --> 00:59:54,239 board. 1258 01:00:01,559 --> 01:00:08,739 That motion carries six to zero. That will move us to our 1259 01:00:08,739 --> 01:00:10,320 project matrix this 1260 01:00:10,320 --> 01:00:15,119 evening. Okay are there any items that you guys would like 1261 01:00:15,119 --> 01:00:16,000 to add to the matrix 1262 01:00:16,000 --> 01:00:30,940 at this time? Okay I'm just gonna ask a follow-up. I had a 1263 01:00:30,940 --> 01:00:31,840 pretty lengthy one 1264 01:00:31,840 --> 01:00:34,610 that I put on from last meeting. I don't know when that 1265 01:00:34,610 --> 01:00:35,880 will possibly come before 1266 01:00:35,880 --> 01:00:39,190 us or if that's maybe more appropriate when we get past 1267 01:00:39,190 --> 01:00:40,599 elections I'll leave 1268 01:00:40,599 --> 01:00:46,110 that up for staff to give us an update on that. Is this one 1269 01:00:46,110 --> 01:00:47,800 referring to the 1270 01:00:47,800 --> 01:00:51,719 financial analysis? Correct. 1271 01:00:54,840 --> 01:01:03,039 Yeah and you can take that one. We were going to get with 1272 01:01:03,039 --> 01:01:04,079 you individually 1273 01:01:04,079 --> 01:01:08,139 okay and discuss it before we bring forward anything. 1274 01:01:08,139 --> 01:01:09,280 Perfect let me know when 1275 01:01:09,280 --> 01:01:15,719 we'd like to get together on that. Anybody else? Okay 1276 01:01:15,719 --> 01:01:17,280 seeing none I will 1277 01:01:17,280 --> 01:01:22,840 close our meeting this evening at 7.06. Thank you everyone.