1 00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:03,240 Planning and Zoning Commission City of Denton work session. 2 00:00:03,240 --> 00:00:05,559 It is 530 and this 3 00:00:05,559 --> 00:00:08,699 meeting has been duly posted and a quorum is present and I 4 00:00:08,699 --> 00:00:10,599 call our meeting to 5 00:00:10,599 --> 00:00:14,019 order at this time. Our first item of business in our work 6 00:00:14,019 --> 00:00:14,839 session is to 7 00:00:14,839 --> 00:00:18,969 receive a report of clarification of agenda items and at 8 00:00:18,969 --> 00:00:20,160 this time I'm going 9 00:00:20,160 --> 00:00:23,140 to turn that over to Manal for presentation. Thank you 10 00:00:23,140 --> 00:00:24,199 Chairperson Strange, 11 00:00:24,199 --> 00:00:27,699 members of the Commission. First item we have three plots 12 00:00:27,699 --> 00:00:29,079 on the agenda. The first 13 00:00:29,079 --> 00:00:31,570 one is for a preliminary plot of Cavender investment 14 00:00:31,570 --> 00:00:32,759 properties. Cindy if 15 00:00:32,759 --> 00:00:36,109 you want to come forward please and explain the minor rev 16 00:00:36,109 --> 00:00:37,079 isions that we've 17 00:00:37,079 --> 00:00:40,359 just received for the P&Z. 18 00:00:49,560 --> 00:00:53,799 Cindy Jackson, senior planner with the Planning Department. 19 00:00:53,799 --> 00:00:54,799 The revisions that 20 00:00:54,799 --> 00:00:57,600 you received are just hard copies that were in your packet. 21 00:00:57,600 --> 00:00:58,439 It's just they 22 00:00:58,439 --> 00:01:01,829 might be a little easier for you to look at. Basically what 23 00:01:01,829 --> 00:01:03,479 this is is their 24 00:01:03,479 --> 00:01:10,120 preliminary plotting two lots and the smaller of the lots 25 00:01:10,120 --> 00:01:10,680 will be 26 00:01:10,680 --> 00:01:16,909 developed with the Cavenders Boots City that the rezoning 27 00:01:16,909 --> 00:01:18,200 went through a few 28 00:01:18,200 --> 00:01:22,959 months ago for. The next step in this after the preliminary 29 00:01:22,959 --> 00:01:24,120 plot is approved 30 00:01:24,120 --> 00:01:30,120 will be the final plot of the Cavenders site. Thank you. 31 00:01:32,120 --> 00:01:35,700 Commissioner Beck. Thank you. Lot one is where is what we 32 00:01:35,700 --> 00:01:37,560 're talking about. Lot one is where 33 00:01:37,560 --> 00:01:41,400 Cavenders is going to go. The entire site is the 34 00:01:41,400 --> 00:01:47,319 preliminary plot. Thank you. 35 00:01:48,120 --> 00:01:54,519 Thank you Cindy. We have a final plan for Buc-E's number 39 36 00:01:54,519 --> 00:01:55,719 subdivision. Julie if 37 00:01:55,719 --> 00:01:59,469 you would please walk everybody through this plan I'd 38 00:01:59,469 --> 00:02:05,459 appreciate it. Good evening 39 00:02:05,459 --> 00:02:10,639 Julie Wyatt. All right so here is the final plot. I have a 40 00:02:10,639 --> 00:02:12,840 couple things I want 41 00:02:12,840 --> 00:02:18,189 you to take a look. We had a question earlier today about 42 00:02:18,189 --> 00:02:22,039 right here. So let me 43 00:02:22,039 --> 00:02:28,219 back up. This is a final plat for Buc-E's subdivision. Buc- 44 00:02:28,219 --> 00:02:29,599 E's is intended to be 45 00:02:29,599 --> 00:02:34,560 the anchor on lot one. It will be accessed with Buc-E's 46 00:02:34,560 --> 00:02:35,840 Boulevard which is 47 00:02:35,840 --> 00:02:38,840 going to be a public right-of-way and that that is going to 48 00:02:38,840 --> 00:02:40,120 connect to Nuggetway. 49 00:02:40,120 --> 00:02:45,770 There are out parcels, seven of them that will be developed 50 00:02:45,770 --> 00:02:47,879 . As you recall there 51 00:02:47,879 --> 00:02:50,199 was an invite there's an environmentally sensitive area in 52 00:02:50,199 --> 00:02:52,360 this area. There was 53 00:02:52,360 --> 00:02:56,009 an alternative ESA that came to y'all to have this road 54 00:02:56,009 --> 00:02:58,000 cross. That was withdrawn 55 00:02:58,000 --> 00:03:03,360 by the applicant. So if you notice when you when you zoom 56 00:03:03,360 --> 00:03:05,159 in the access 57 00:03:05,159 --> 00:03:08,000 easement ends at the environmentally sensitive area. 58 00:03:08,000 --> 00:03:09,360 However the 50-foot 59 00:03:09,360 --> 00:03:12,840 water, wastewater, and storm sewer easement does go across 60 00:03:12,840 --> 00:03:14,000 that that 61 00:03:14,000 --> 00:03:17,219 environmentally sensitive area. That is in order to loop 62 00:03:17,219 --> 00:03:18,879 the water line and sewer 63 00:03:18,879 --> 00:03:24,539 line. That is something that can be done as long as the ESA 64 00:03:24,539 --> 00:03:26,360 is not disturbed. So 65 00:03:26,360 --> 00:03:29,169 the applicant, this is from the construction plans, the 66 00:03:29,169 --> 00:03:29,879 applicant is 67 00:03:29,879 --> 00:03:33,280 actually going to bore under that environmentally sensitive 68 00:03:33,280 --> 00:03:33,840 area to go 69 00:03:33,840 --> 00:03:36,879 across it so they do not disturb it. So that is for all of 70 00:03:36,879 --> 00:03:37,919 the utilities that 71 00:03:37,919 --> 00:03:42,210 would be going in that easement. Commissioner Beck. Thank 72 00:03:42,210 --> 00:03:43,599 you. So no 73 00:03:43,599 --> 00:03:48,919 storm scepters? No sir. Okay. Okay and just to be clear 74 00:03:48,919 --> 00:03:50,680 that go back to the 75 00:03:50,680 --> 00:03:56,319 first slide you put up there. The plat? Yes. Okay. Where 76 00:03:56,319 --> 00:03:58,520 the road was going to be. It's a 77 00:03:58,520 --> 00:04:05,020 shaded area now. So is that design where sometime down the 78 00:04:05,020 --> 00:04:06,719 road they may come 79 00:04:06,719 --> 00:04:10,280 back and try and put a road in there? Is that option being 80 00:04:10,280 --> 00:04:11,639 left open? I don't know 81 00:04:11,639 --> 00:04:14,250 what their future plans are. It is something they could 82 00:04:14,250 --> 00:04:15,280 always come back 83 00:04:15,280 --> 00:04:18,339 forward with. It would go through the same process that 84 00:04:18,339 --> 00:04:19,560 they did before where 85 00:04:19,560 --> 00:04:21,610 it would have to come back. Staff would analyze it. It 86 00:04:21,610 --> 00:04:22,720 would have to come back to 87 00:04:22,720 --> 00:04:26,240 this Commission and then on to City Council for approval. 88 00:04:26,240 --> 00:04:27,279 So if they did do 89 00:04:27,279 --> 00:04:29,769 that you you would know about it. Okay and then one last 90 00:04:29,769 --> 00:04:31,079 question. Do we know what 91 00:04:31,079 --> 00:04:35,189 kind of commercial buildings to expect on lots two through 92 00:04:35,189 --> 00:04:36,959 eight? We don't. We don't 93 00:04:36,959 --> 00:04:38,500 know how they're going to define it. Probably going to be a 94 00:04:38,500 --> 00:04:42,160 chicken joint in there somewhere with nugget what? Well the 95 00:04:42,160 --> 00:04:47,959 Beaver Nuggets I think is there. Okay thank you. Sure. 96 00:04:48,360 --> 00:04:52,509 Commissioner Dedowitz. Thank you. Just another point that 97 00:04:52,509 --> 00:04:53,480 we had discussed and 98 00:04:53,480 --> 00:04:57,319 that was access to lot two. How was what's the plan? Have 99 00:04:57,319 --> 00:04:58,560 they discussed that? 100 00:04:58,560 --> 00:05:01,490 Thank you for bringing that up. I actually failed to 101 00:05:01,490 --> 00:05:03,600 discuss that. There is a 102 00:05:03,600 --> 00:05:08,639 right-of-way that runs adjacent to the property so the lot 103 00:05:08,639 --> 00:05:09,360 two will be 104 00:05:09,360 --> 00:05:11,920 accessed from this right-of-way that's adjacent to the 105 00:05:11,920 --> 00:05:14,360 property. Who owns that? I believe the City of Denton. 106 00:05:14,360 --> 00:05:18,839 It's the City of Denton right-of-way. Does that belong to 107 00:05:18,839 --> 00:05:21,560 the Shopping Center? No sir. 108 00:05:21,560 --> 00:05:26,670 It's a public right-of-way and right now it's just dirt. It 109 00:05:26,670 --> 00:05:29,319 's not improved right now. I'm assuming it will become 110 00:05:29,319 --> 00:05:35,199 improved at some point. Question then if it is public right 111 00:05:35,199 --> 00:05:35,839 -of-way I 112 00:05:35,839 --> 00:05:40,800 guess for them to develop lot two they'll have to put that 113 00:05:40,800 --> 00:05:42,199 in develop and do 114 00:05:42,199 --> 00:05:45,819 the improvements and then deed those to the city? Yes sir. 115 00:05:45,819 --> 00:05:46,680 Yes sir. It's a city 116 00:05:46,680 --> 00:05:57,839 standards correct? Anybody else? Thank you Julie. We have 117 00:05:57,839 --> 00:05:58,879 another preliminary plan 118 00:05:58,879 --> 00:06:03,579 which is Country Club Village phase 2A. Chandrin is going 119 00:06:03,579 --> 00:06:04,959 to give a synopsis of 120 00:06:04,959 --> 00:06:12,199 that for us tonight as well. Thank you Chandrin. Chandrin 121 00:06:12,199 --> 00:06:14,160 Jarvis with Planey. 122 00:06:14,160 --> 00:06:20,040 This is the preliminary plan for section 2A of the Country 123 00:06:20,040 --> 00:06:21,759 Club Village. If you 124 00:06:21,759 --> 00:06:25,800 remember we you guys approved a general development plan in 125 00:06:25,800 --> 00:06:27,519 the last meeting so 126 00:06:27,519 --> 00:06:31,269 this is just the next step in that process and following 127 00:06:31,269 --> 00:06:32,079 this will probably 128 00:06:32,079 --> 00:06:39,120 be probably be a final flat. They are platting 25 lots zone 129 00:06:39,120 --> 00:06:41,959 in our in our two 130 00:06:41,959 --> 00:06:49,490 at the corner of well just just east of Fort Worth Drive 131 00:06:49,490 --> 00:06:51,519 and south of Brush 132 00:06:51,519 --> 00:06:58,680 Crutcher. Commissioner Beck. Thank you Chair. I think last 133 00:06:58,680 --> 00:06:59,319 time when we were 134 00:06:59,319 --> 00:07:01,519 looking at the general development I raised the concern 135 00:07:01,519 --> 00:07:02,680 about there being no 136 00:07:02,680 --> 00:07:06,529 parks or anything like that and again I know they don't 137 00:07:06,529 --> 00:07:08,079 have to do that but we've 138 00:07:08,079 --> 00:07:10,899 got these developments going on way out there people moving 139 00:07:10,899 --> 00:07:11,800 in yet there's no 140 00:07:11,800 --> 00:07:15,819 recreational areas so can we can I bring this up can we 141 00:07:15,819 --> 00:07:17,000 raise this as an issue 142 00:07:17,000 --> 00:07:23,199 or is this beyond our scope? It's beyond the scope for this 143 00:07:23,199 --> 00:07:24,759 . I know that there is 144 00:07:24,759 --> 00:07:27,879 a park dedication fee that goes on every lot that's 145 00:07:27,879 --> 00:07:29,480 developed and if you want to 146 00:07:29,480 --> 00:07:32,029 go into that more maybe you can bring that up at the 147 00:07:32,029 --> 00:07:33,399 conclusion for a future 148 00:07:33,399 --> 00:07:35,899 agenda item if you want to talk some more about parks. Okay 149 00:07:35,899 --> 00:07:36,480 which would 150 00:07:36,480 --> 00:07:41,439 indicate that maybe they would put a park in there? I said 151 00:07:41,439 --> 00:07:42,000 no. I'll let Manal 152 00:07:42,000 --> 00:07:47,879 address that. Jennifer who ever wants to? Who wants it? 153 00:07:47,879 --> 00:07:49,439 Generally they can either 154 00:07:49,439 --> 00:07:53,189 dedicate the open space or they can pay a fee so if they 155 00:07:53,189 --> 00:07:54,899 did a fee in lieu of an 156 00:07:54,899 --> 00:07:59,459 open space then it would not be depicted on here as an open 157 00:07:59,459 --> 00:08:00,899 space but they have 158 00:08:00,899 --> 00:08:02,899 to do one or the other so long as they meet the 159 00:08:02,899 --> 00:08:05,040 requirements that that kick it 160 00:08:05,040 --> 00:08:10,100 in but as far as the preliminary plan is concerned we can't 161 00:08:10,100 --> 00:08:10,920 as long as they meet 162 00:08:10,920 --> 00:08:15,149 the technical requirements we can't make them go back. But 163 00:08:15,149 --> 00:08:15,839 that fee in lieu of 164 00:08:15,839 --> 00:08:19,810 would not necessarily affect that development then it would 165 00:08:19,810 --> 00:08:21,000 affect parks 166 00:08:21,000 --> 00:08:26,730 somewhere else within the city would benefit the park? That 167 00:08:26,730 --> 00:08:29,519 's right. Just to piggyback on that just a little bit I know 168 00:08:29,519 --> 00:08:29,720 it's a 169 00:08:29,720 --> 00:08:32,350 little off topic but we do have on the matrix where we're 170 00:08:32,350 --> 00:08:33,220 trying to get the 171 00:08:33,220 --> 00:08:35,490 Parks Department and come into a presentation as it relates 172 00:08:35,490 --> 00:08:36,000 to parkland 173 00:08:36,000 --> 00:08:38,779 dedication and the mechanisms that they have in place so we 174 00:08:38,779 --> 00:08:41,320 're working on that. 175 00:08:41,320 --> 00:08:45,440 These are fairly large larger lots anyway. I'm familiar 176 00:08:45,440 --> 00:08:47,000 with the development to the 177 00:08:47,000 --> 00:08:52,370 north and most of those people put in their own swing sets 178 00:08:52,370 --> 00:08:53,120 and and stuff 179 00:08:53,120 --> 00:08:56,200 there too but they're gonna find a lot of my golf balls in 180 00:08:56,200 --> 00:08:57,200 that one they start 181 00:08:57,200 --> 00:09:02,259 digging up over there. That's right to the side of the 182 00:09:02,259 --> 00:09:04,600 third hole and if the 183 00:09:04,600 --> 00:09:09,039 wind's blowing all those golf balls are going in there. But 184 00:09:09,039 --> 00:09:12,240 usually goes the other way into the 185 00:09:12,240 --> 00:09:16,919 lake. Thank you Shandrin. 186 00:09:19,799 --> 00:09:24,299 Next item Judy Wyatt will be discussing it's a request for 187 00:09:24,299 --> 00:09:25,320 a change in zoning 188 00:09:25,320 --> 00:09:31,159 and I'm gonna yield the floor to Judy to go over the case. 189 00:09:38,679 --> 00:09:41,679 All right. 190 00:09:44,960 --> 00:09:50,669 All right so this is Z-16-6 McCormick Apartments. The 191 00:09:50,669 --> 00:09:52,279 request before you is to 192 00:09:52,279 --> 00:09:55,100 consider making a recommendation to City Council regarding 193 00:09:55,100 --> 00:09:56,440 a rezoning from DR 1 194 00:09:56,440 --> 00:10:02,320 to DR 2 on approximately a third of an acre. The location 195 00:10:02,320 --> 00:10:04,039 of the property it is 196 00:10:04,039 --> 00:10:08,480 on the corner of McCormick and Eagle. It is just south of 197 00:10:08,480 --> 00:10:11,919 the UNT campus and just 198 00:10:11,919 --> 00:10:16,360 to bring in Google again just to give you that their their 199 00:10:16,360 --> 00:10:17,480 aerials are a little 200 00:10:17,480 --> 00:10:21,460 more up to date than ours and it gives you a little bigger 201 00:10:21,460 --> 00:10:22,559 clarity on what's 202 00:10:22,559 --> 00:10:26,840 going on in the area. So we have the University of North 203 00:10:26,840 --> 00:10:27,799 Texas to the north 204 00:10:27,799 --> 00:10:31,110 and this really is a mixed-use kind of University District 205 00:10:31,110 --> 00:10:32,200 area and this is a 206 00:10:32,200 --> 00:10:36,679 residence hall and I think it has a thousand students. We 207 00:10:36,679 --> 00:10:38,399 have apartments 208 00:10:38,399 --> 00:10:42,840 interspersed in the area. We also have single-family homes 209 00:10:42,840 --> 00:10:44,639 and here's some 210 00:10:44,639 --> 00:10:47,470 religious institutions. So there's quite a mix. There's 211 00:10:47,470 --> 00:10:48,480 also some commercial 212 00:10:48,480 --> 00:10:53,740 development over here on Eagle and on Avenue C. Just south 213 00:10:53,740 --> 00:10:54,720 of the property 214 00:10:54,720 --> 00:10:57,960 there were once single-family dwellings that have since 215 00:10:57,960 --> 00:11:00,679 been demolished so the 216 00:11:00,679 --> 00:11:07,759 area is changing and it is evolving. The zoning corresponds 217 00:11:07,759 --> 00:11:08,960 to the mixed-use 218 00:11:08,960 --> 00:11:15,379 of the area. We have DCG which is the University area. DR2 219 00:11:15,379 --> 00:11:16,279 is across the 220 00:11:16,279 --> 00:11:20,029 street from the property so a rezoning to DR2 for this 221 00:11:20,029 --> 00:11:21,200 property would really be a 222 00:11:21,200 --> 00:11:26,799 logical extension of that existing DR2. We have some DR1, 223 00:11:26,799 --> 00:11:28,000 the subject property 224 00:11:28,000 --> 00:11:31,559 as well as the adjacent properties, some DCN and then some 225 00:11:31,559 --> 00:11:32,919 DR2. So it really is a 226 00:11:32,919 --> 00:11:39,200 mix of zoning uses or zoning districts and the uses on the 227 00:11:39,200 --> 00:11:39,759 ground 228 00:11:39,759 --> 00:11:47,679 reflect that mix of zoning. Let me go back one. The 229 00:11:47,679 --> 00:11:48,440 applicant is 230 00:11:48,440 --> 00:11:52,490 proposing the DR2 in order to develop the property with 231 00:11:52,490 --> 00:11:54,360 multi-family. Now 232 00:11:54,360 --> 00:11:57,840 multi-family is permitted in DR2 as well as some small- 233 00:11:57,840 --> 00:12:00,720 scale commercial uses. So 234 00:12:00,720 --> 00:12:06,649 DR1 is primarily more of a single-family residential or du 235 00:12:06,649 --> 00:12:07,480 plex, the 236 00:12:07,480 --> 00:12:11,460 lower density residential uses. So that's why the applicant 237 00:12:11,460 --> 00:12:12,480 is coming forward the 238 00:12:12,480 --> 00:12:16,399 DR2 in order to develop the property with multi-family. 239 00:12:16,399 --> 00:12:17,879 When we look at the 240 00:12:17,879 --> 00:12:21,360 Denton Plan 2030 we see that this is a neighborhood 241 00:12:21,360 --> 00:12:22,879 university compatibility 242 00:12:22,879 --> 00:12:27,840 area and we can see that by what's on the ground. If you 243 00:12:27,840 --> 00:12:29,419 just look at the 244 00:12:29,419 --> 00:12:32,759 map you'll see that we have the government institutional 245 00:12:32,759 --> 00:12:33,399 future land 246 00:12:33,399 --> 00:12:35,970 use category here and that's where the University of North 247 00:12:35,970 --> 00:12:37,919 Texas is. We have the 248 00:12:37,919 --> 00:12:42,179 neighborhood university compatibility area that rings 249 00:12:42,179 --> 00:12:44,840 around UNT and that 250 00:12:44,840 --> 00:12:47,809 includes the subject property. When you get in this area 251 00:12:47,809 --> 00:12:48,799 you get more of the 252 00:12:48,799 --> 00:12:51,250 downtown and downtown compatibility area and then you get 253 00:12:51,250 --> 00:12:52,159 some more commercial 254 00:12:52,159 --> 00:12:56,919 uses on 35 and then toward Dallas Drive. The neighborhood 255 00:12:56,919 --> 00:12:57,679 university 256 00:12:57,679 --> 00:13:00,580 compatibility area is really those areas that are affected 257 00:13:00,580 --> 00:13:00,919 by the 258 00:13:00,919 --> 00:13:05,129 universities in our city and in this case it's UNT. The CO 259 00:13:05,129 --> 00:13:06,360 MP plan calls for a 260 00:13:06,360 --> 00:13:09,840 gradual transition from the real intense development of the 261 00:13:09,840 --> 00:13:11,480 universities to more 262 00:13:11,480 --> 00:13:16,759 of the neighborhoods and then they want a mix of uses. They 263 00:13:16,759 --> 00:13:17,159 really want 264 00:13:17,159 --> 00:13:24,000 to activate the public realm and encourage walkable and 265 00:13:24,000 --> 00:13:25,200 bicycling 266 00:13:25,200 --> 00:13:29,240 areas. So that's really what the COMP plan is calling for. 267 00:13:29,240 --> 00:13:30,799 The proposed DR2 268 00:13:30,799 --> 00:13:36,149 does fit within this future land use designation. So the 269 00:13:36,149 --> 00:13:36,879 considerations 270 00:13:36,879 --> 00:13:40,139 that staff looked at when we were analyzing the case is 271 00:13:40,139 --> 00:13:41,080 first what was 272 00:13:41,080 --> 00:13:46,149 going on at the site and at the block level with the rede 273 00:13:46,149 --> 00:13:46,720 velopment that's 274 00:13:46,720 --> 00:13:50,149 going on. That's really signaling to us that this area is 275 00:13:50,149 --> 00:13:51,480 probably in transition 276 00:13:51,480 --> 00:13:58,000 and maybe single-family uses aren't entirely appropriate 277 00:13:58,000 --> 00:13:58,320 for this 278 00:13:58,320 --> 00:14:02,379 area especially the adjacency to the university and that 279 00:14:02,379 --> 00:14:03,799 the DR2 district is 280 00:14:03,799 --> 00:14:06,529 consistent with the future land use designation and it's 281 00:14:06,529 --> 00:14:07,519 consistent with the 282 00:14:07,519 --> 00:14:12,480 existing zoning pattern. The additional density and uses 283 00:14:12,480 --> 00:14:13,559 that are associated 284 00:14:13,559 --> 00:14:18,080 with DR2 district are desirable next to the university as 285 00:14:18,080 --> 00:14:19,159 it would contribute to 286 00:14:19,159 --> 00:14:24,320 the walkability of the area and it is consistent with the 287 00:14:24,320 --> 00:14:25,919 eclectic mixed use 288 00:14:25,919 --> 00:14:30,879 character of the neighborhood. However, the code does 289 00:14:30,879 --> 00:14:32,120 require for a 290 00:14:32,120 --> 00:14:35,480 gradual transition and so the redevelopment should be 291 00:14:35,480 --> 00:14:36,440 sensitive in 292 00:14:36,440 --> 00:14:41,200 scale to not only the university but also the established 293 00:14:41,200 --> 00:14:41,720 neighborhoods 294 00:14:41,720 --> 00:14:46,679 nearby. We feel like DR2 district meets this requirement 295 00:14:46,679 --> 00:14:47,539 because the height, you 296 00:14:47,539 --> 00:14:51,080 know, there's only a maximum height to 45 feet, maximum lot 297 00:14:51,080 --> 00:14:52,600 coverage of 75 feet, so 298 00:14:52,600 --> 00:14:59,240 it keeps the scale consistent with what you could expect in 299 00:14:59,240 --> 00:14:59,639 an urban 300 00:14:59,639 --> 00:15:04,399 residential neighborhood. And then DR2 district would allow 301 00:15:04,399 --> 00:15:04,679 the 302 00:15:04,679 --> 00:15:07,669 subject property to redevelop to provide the essential 303 00:15:07,669 --> 00:15:09,360 housing for students and 304 00:15:09,360 --> 00:15:13,230 also if it did develop that way, a neighborhood serving 305 00:15:13,230 --> 00:15:14,440 commercial uses 306 00:15:14,440 --> 00:15:18,080 while it's still, as I said, maintain that scale that is 307 00:15:18,080 --> 00:15:19,360 consistent or that 308 00:15:19,360 --> 00:15:23,600 transitions to those existing neighborhoods. Here are some 309 00:15:23,600 --> 00:15:24,120 pictures. 310 00:15:24,120 --> 00:15:27,610 Once again, I'm not good at taking the picture so don't 311 00:15:27,610 --> 00:15:29,120 expect a lot but here's 312 00:15:29,120 --> 00:15:32,240 the subject property and then you can see the adjacent 313 00:15:32,240 --> 00:15:33,159 properties that 314 00:15:33,159 --> 00:15:36,710 those are no longer there. This is the middle of the street 315 00:15:36,710 --> 00:15:37,639 and this is looking 316 00:15:37,639 --> 00:15:41,870 south toward the residential area and then this is looking 317 00:15:41,870 --> 00:15:44,000 north toward UNT. 318 00:15:44,000 --> 00:15:46,940 So you can see it really there's, you know, this really is 319 00:15:46,940 --> 00:15:48,039 transitioning from 320 00:15:48,039 --> 00:15:53,559 that university to the neighborhoods. We did send out a 321 00:15:53,559 --> 00:15:53,879 public 322 00:15:53,879 --> 00:15:57,820 notification. We received one notice that was neutral to 323 00:15:57,820 --> 00:15:59,840 the request and due to 324 00:15:59,840 --> 00:16:02,600 the considerations and the criteria for approval, staff 325 00:16:02,600 --> 00:16:03,799 does recommend approval 326 00:16:03,799 --> 00:16:07,840 of the request and I'll answer any questions. Commissioner 327 00:16:07,840 --> 00:16:09,159 Rossell. Thank you. 328 00:16:09,159 --> 00:16:15,139 The other two lots seem recently demolished based on the 329 00:16:15,139 --> 00:16:16,480 pictures. It 330 00:16:16,480 --> 00:16:21,120 looks relatively recent. It does. Has that owner or owners 331 00:16:21,120 --> 00:16:22,320 come before PNZ 332 00:16:22,320 --> 00:16:24,940 before my time with any kind of request for rezoning? Has 333 00:16:24,940 --> 00:16:25,559 there been any 334 00:16:25,559 --> 00:16:28,039 action on that, those two lots? There hasn't been any 335 00:16:28,039 --> 00:16:29,120 action. They are actually 336 00:16:29,120 --> 00:16:32,610 owned by a religious institution and so if they were to 337 00:16:32,610 --> 00:16:34,120 develop, religious 338 00:16:34,120 --> 00:16:39,889 institutions are permitted in any zoning district so you 339 00:16:39,889 --> 00:16:40,679 know if that 340 00:16:40,679 --> 00:16:44,809 actual owner was to develop they could buy right in the 341 00:16:44,809 --> 00:16:45,639 zoning, any zoning 342 00:16:45,639 --> 00:16:50,080 district they had. That owner owns both lots? Yes, I 343 00:16:50,080 --> 00:16:53,399 believe several lots within 344 00:16:53,399 --> 00:16:56,539 in this area. And that's a distinct different owner than 345 00:16:56,539 --> 00:16:57,120 the one the 346 00:16:57,120 --> 00:17:00,870 applicant who's applying this evening? Yes sir. Okay. Thank 347 00:17:00,870 --> 00:17:02,759 you. Commissioner Beck. 348 00:17:02,759 --> 00:17:08,599 Thank you chair. That single house that sits there, the 349 00:17:08,599 --> 00:17:09,880 owner does he live in 350 00:17:09,880 --> 00:17:14,839 that? I don't believe so. The applicant is here. I see her. 351 00:17:14,839 --> 00:17:16,200 So she'll be able 352 00:17:16,200 --> 00:17:20,119 to answer questions at the regular meeting for you. Okay so 353 00:17:20,119 --> 00:17:21,160 I would gather 354 00:17:21,160 --> 00:17:26,240 too by the lack of input you got from notification. I'm 355 00:17:26,240 --> 00:17:27,000 thinking most of that 356 00:17:27,000 --> 00:17:33,440 area is rented out in the first place. Okay so now your 357 00:17:33,440 --> 00:17:35,160 first page had McCormick 358 00:17:35,160 --> 00:17:40,599 apartments on it. So is that in fact what we're looking at? 359 00:17:40,599 --> 00:17:41,519 Not that it makes any difference? She is. 360 00:17:41,519 --> 00:17:44,240 It's not going to be a fourplex or something? She is 361 00:17:44,240 --> 00:17:45,640 looking well a fourplex would be 362 00:17:45,640 --> 00:17:49,559 considered multifamily within the City of Denton. So she is 363 00:17:49,559 --> 00:17:50,759 looking to develop 364 00:17:50,759 --> 00:17:53,880 the property with multifamily. Of course staff when we look 365 00:17:53,880 --> 00:17:54,799 at a zoning case we 366 00:17:54,799 --> 00:17:56,720 don't just look at what they're wanting to do. We look at 367 00:17:56,720 --> 00:17:57,559 all of those uses and 368 00:17:57,559 --> 00:18:00,630 and how it could develop in accordance with that zoning 369 00:18:00,630 --> 00:18:01,700 district and make a 370 00:18:01,700 --> 00:18:05,359 determination based upon that. So that is her according to 371 00:18:05,359 --> 00:18:06,160 her application that's 372 00:18:06,160 --> 00:18:10,740 her intent right now. Okay is it okay to ask her order? She 373 00:18:10,740 --> 00:18:12,000 intends to build? Is that 374 00:18:12,000 --> 00:18:18,359 appropriate now? Staff says if you want to do that we could 375 00:18:18,359 --> 00:18:18,839 certainly do that 376 00:18:18,839 --> 00:18:22,640 during the public hearing but not during the work session. 377 00:18:22,640 --> 00:18:22,640 Okay. Thank you. 378 00:18:22,640 --> 00:18:27,670 Commissioner Hussbett. Shocker. I was a little nervous 379 00:18:27,670 --> 00:18:30,759 about this one about the 380 00:18:30,759 --> 00:18:35,240 neighborhood. So this is an odd position for me but seeing 381 00:18:35,240 --> 00:18:35,680 updated 382 00:18:35,680 --> 00:18:39,119 pictures help and my question is for you though I did 383 00:18:39,119 --> 00:18:40,680 notice the apartment down 384 00:18:40,680 --> 00:18:45,640 into the other side of the street. No no same street on McC 385 00:18:45,640 --> 00:18:46,839 ormick there about 386 00:18:46,839 --> 00:18:49,869 midway there's an right there. Yes sir. Yes sir. Any issues 387 00:18:49,869 --> 00:18:51,079 there that we're 388 00:18:51,079 --> 00:18:56,759 aware of or any thing that's arisen because that's there? I 389 00:18:56,759 --> 00:18:58,039 I'm not aware of 390 00:18:58,039 --> 00:19:05,670 any. Okay. Commissioner Dedowitz. What I find amusing is 391 00:19:05,670 --> 00:19:06,759 that we could put a 392 00:19:06,759 --> 00:19:13,480 fraternity or a sorority house there by an SUP. You know so 393 00:19:13,480 --> 00:19:15,160 yeah to your point 394 00:19:15,160 --> 00:19:17,170 I'm just saying is that you know there are other 395 00:19:17,170 --> 00:19:18,759 alternatives here it's a mixed 396 00:19:18,759 --> 00:19:21,529 use area and it's changing it's going to change and it's 397 00:19:21,529 --> 00:19:22,599 done correctly I think 398 00:19:22,599 --> 00:19:29,200 as by the future use map it would be compatible. 399 00:19:29,200 --> 00:19:32,000 Commissioner Taylor. Thank you 400 00:19:32,000 --> 00:19:37,240 Chair. I had two questions one's more about paperwork. We 401 00:19:37,240 --> 00:19:38,799 used to get permitted 402 00:19:38,799 --> 00:19:43,759 uses comparisons in a tabular format where it would show dr 403 00:19:43,759 --> 00:19:45,599 1 in one column dr2 404 00:19:45,599 --> 00:19:49,480 in the other column and maybe like red where things get 405 00:19:49,480 --> 00:19:50,400 denied you know no 406 00:19:50,400 --> 00:19:53,170 longer permitted and green where things are now permitted 407 00:19:53,170 --> 00:19:54,000 and it's a little more 408 00:19:54,000 --> 00:19:57,650 readable format than going into like a text list and then 409 00:19:57,650 --> 00:19:59,079 having to leave that 410 00:19:59,079 --> 00:20:01,920 document go into another text list I don't know if that's 411 00:20:01,920 --> 00:20:03,200 something we can do. 412 00:20:03,200 --> 00:20:07,279 We can go back to doing tabular. Well we just have one disc 413 00:20:07,279 --> 00:20:08,279 repancy with 414 00:20:08,279 --> 00:20:11,359 legislature but that's an adminstural issue let's see what 415 00:20:11,359 --> 00:20:12,240 we can do to mitigate that. 416 00:20:12,240 --> 00:20:15,720 Yeah just in that way it's a lot easier because it's like 417 00:20:15,720 --> 00:20:17,039 so single families 418 00:20:17,039 --> 00:20:19,430 allowed and duplexes are allowed and you know you have to 419 00:20:19,430 --> 00:20:20,359 back out look you know 420 00:20:20,359 --> 00:20:22,869 remember that list while you look at the second list where 421 00:20:22,869 --> 00:20:23,839 you can see all the red 422 00:20:23,839 --> 00:20:26,450 ones are no longer allowed and all the green ones are you 423 00:20:26,450 --> 00:20:28,160 know now allowed and 424 00:20:28,160 --> 00:20:33,950 the second question I had is what were the dr1 owners and 425 00:20:33,950 --> 00:20:35,259 in the area that 426 00:20:35,259 --> 00:20:39,720 demolished area notified and to see if they want to 427 00:20:39,720 --> 00:20:40,960 participate in this 428 00:20:40,960 --> 00:20:46,480 rezoning? We did not do that. So this is one of the areas 429 00:20:46,480 --> 00:20:48,160 of town that is changing 430 00:20:48,160 --> 00:20:52,670 and we are we aren't reasonably expecting a single lot on a 431 00:20:52,670 --> 00:20:53,519 block that's 432 00:20:53,519 --> 00:21:01,869 all dr2 and DCG DCN to probably stay dr1 so I'd like to see 433 00:21:01,869 --> 00:21:03,599 as much block 434 00:21:03,599 --> 00:21:06,640 rezoning as possible you know consistent rezoning and then 435 00:21:06,640 --> 00:21:07,559 we also solve the 436 00:21:07,559 --> 00:21:10,210 conflict problem because if we do it one at a time we're 437 00:21:10,210 --> 00:21:11,240 going to have a potential 438 00:21:11,240 --> 00:21:14,990 conflict on all five lots in the block where if we just do 439 00:21:14,990 --> 00:21:16,960 the block we know 440 00:21:16,960 --> 00:21:21,150 that there isn't a conflict within the block. That was 441 00:21:21,150 --> 00:21:21,480 discussed in our subcommittee. 442 00:21:21,480 --> 00:21:23,109 Commissioner Dudowitz. That was discussed in our sub 443 00:21:23,109 --> 00:21:24,400 committee meeting of trying to 444 00:21:24,400 --> 00:21:28,150 make sense of it so not to do a patchwork situation here 445 00:21:28,150 --> 00:21:28,799 and if we can 446 00:21:28,799 --> 00:21:30,480 see something like this we know what's going to happen 447 00:21:30,480 --> 00:21:31,960 there and it's already 448 00:21:31,960 --> 00:21:38,440 dr2 or surrounded it let's do a block. Is this an area that 449 00:21:38,440 --> 00:21:39,440 I know I think 450 00:21:39,440 --> 00:21:44,720 you're chair that committee? Devon? You want to add that 451 00:21:44,720 --> 00:21:46,079 area to your list? Do you have a 452 00:21:46,079 --> 00:21:49,509 list that you're already looking at? So I was looking for 453 00:21:49,509 --> 00:21:50,359 Ron over there I 454 00:21:50,359 --> 00:21:58,119 believe that... Oh so I believe this is on the list to look 455 00:21:58,119 --> 00:21:59,319 at. 456 00:21:59,319 --> 00:22:06,640 Yes okay. Commissioner Hussbett. One other question I know 457 00:22:06,640 --> 00:22:07,480 they're currently 458 00:22:07,480 --> 00:22:11,250 reconstructing Eagle I think it's going to two lanes two 459 00:22:11,250 --> 00:22:12,519 bike lanes is that 460 00:22:12,519 --> 00:22:18,240 right? Yes sir. So is there a way for us to manage or work 461 00:22:18,240 --> 00:22:19,599 with them one fatal 462 00:22:19,599 --> 00:22:22,650 swoop to kind of make sure we're not duplicating efforts or 463 00:22:22,650 --> 00:22:23,519 is there any way 464 00:22:23,519 --> 00:22:26,240 to kind of direct it that way or are we kind of at the 465 00:22:26,240 --> 00:22:28,240 property owners discretion? 466 00:22:28,240 --> 00:22:31,990 Typically when we're when a property is redeveloped that 467 00:22:31,990 --> 00:22:33,400 property owner puts in 468 00:22:33,400 --> 00:22:37,049 the sidewalks and and make sure this I'm answering your 469 00:22:37,049 --> 00:22:38,440 question so jump in if 470 00:22:38,440 --> 00:22:42,000 I'm not so typically that is the property owner of that 471 00:22:42,000 --> 00:22:42,519 individual 472 00:22:42,519 --> 00:22:46,680 property would would put in the infrastructure for that 473 00:22:46,680 --> 00:22:48,000 that of the 474 00:22:48,000 --> 00:22:54,319 streets and and and sidewalks that abut that property. So I 475 00:22:54,319 --> 00:22:56,599 guess do we give the 476 00:22:56,599 --> 00:22:59,009 property owner direction because I don't know that the 477 00:22:59,009 --> 00:23:00,079 property owner would would 478 00:23:00,079 --> 00:23:03,910 have the foresight of know who to contact to try to okay 479 00:23:03,910 --> 00:23:04,640 that was my 480 00:23:04,640 --> 00:23:07,859 question to make sure we're... Engineering reviews all 481 00:23:07,859 --> 00:23:09,279 cases and so they give them 482 00:23:09,279 --> 00:23:12,009 and and they really try to give them direction as early in 483 00:23:12,009 --> 00:23:12,759 the process as 484 00:23:12,759 --> 00:23:17,339 possible just just to so people know what's coming so so I 485 00:23:17,339 --> 00:23:18,119 know that's 486 00:23:18,119 --> 00:23:22,559 something that a DRC engineering really tries to do to set 487 00:23:22,559 --> 00:23:23,160 the set the 488 00:23:23,160 --> 00:23:26,829 groundwork. That's why I have sidewalks to nowhere in front 489 00:23:26,829 --> 00:23:27,759 of my building 490 00:23:27,759 --> 00:23:36,369 because of the future potential. Any other questions on 491 00:23:36,369 --> 00:23:39,359 this case? 492 00:23:39,640 --> 00:23:43,119 Thank you. 493 00:23:46,720 --> 00:23:50,170 Okay that is all the items that we have on our work session 494 00:23:50,170 --> 00:23:52,640 for this evening so 495 00:23:52,640 --> 00:23:58,109 at 553 I'm going to close our work session and we'll recon 496 00:23:58,109 --> 00:23:59,079 vene in council 497 00:23:59,079 --> 00:24:03,279 chambers at 630 for our public meeting. 498 00:24:11,720 --> 00:24:13,200 Good evening and welcome to our City of Denton Planning and 499 00:24:13,200 --> 00:24:16,519 Zoning Commission 500 00:24:16,519 --> 00:24:21,690 meeting for May the 25th. It is 630 and this meeting has 501 00:24:21,690 --> 00:24:23,440 been duly posted and a 502 00:24:23,440 --> 00:24:25,890 quorum is present and I'm calling our meeting to order at 503 00:24:25,890 --> 00:24:27,440 this time. Our first 504 00:24:27,440 --> 00:24:30,059 order of business tonight is going to be to stand and give 505 00:24:30,059 --> 00:24:31,160 the pledge to the US 506 00:24:31,160 --> 00:24:33,960 and the Texas flag. 507 00:24:46,640 --> 00:24:48,640 With liberty and justice for all. 508 00:24:50,640 --> 00:24:56,369 On the Texas flag, our pledge allegiance to thee, Texas, 509 00:24:56,369 --> 00:25:02,640 one state, under God, one and indivisible. 510 00:25:12,920 --> 00:25:17,079 Our next order of business is going to be to consider the 511 00:25:17,079 --> 00:25:19,359 approval of our P&Z 512 00:25:19,359 --> 00:25:25,039 Commission meeting minutes for April the 27th. 513 00:25:30,880 --> 00:25:35,890 Commissioner Hutsbitt. Move approval. Commissioner Dudowitz 514 00:25:35,890 --> 00:25:37,599 . I second. We have a 515 00:25:37,599 --> 00:25:42,920 first and a second. Any discussion? Seeing none, I'll call 516 00:25:42,920 --> 00:25:46,119 for a vote on the board. 517 00:25:55,000 --> 00:26:00,119 Motion passes six to zero. That moves us to our consent 518 00:26:00,119 --> 00:26:07,119 agenda. I do have one card 519 00:26:07,119 --> 00:26:14,259 from Ken Gold for agenda item 3B. This is a consent agenda 520 00:26:14,259 --> 00:26:15,519 item so it's not a 521 00:26:15,519 --> 00:26:17,869 public hearing but did want to acknowledge that you brought 522 00:26:17,869 --> 00:26:18,240 in a card 523 00:26:18,240 --> 00:26:22,079 but we will not be calling for you to speak on this 524 00:26:22,079 --> 00:26:23,759 particular item. 525 00:26:23,759 --> 00:26:28,000 Commissioner Rozelle. I move to approve the consent agenda 526 00:26:28,000 --> 00:26:29,640 item. Commissioner 527 00:26:29,640 --> 00:26:34,210 Dudowitz. I second. Motion. We have a first and a second. 528 00:26:34,210 --> 00:26:35,160 Any discussion on the 529 00:26:35,160 --> 00:26:42,500 consent agenda? Seeing none, I'll call for a vote on the 530 00:26:42,500 --> 00:26:43,680 board. 531 00:26:50,000 --> 00:26:59,359 Motion carries six to zero. Moves us to item number four, 532 00:26:59,359 --> 00:27:02,039 our public hearing. At 533 00:27:02,039 --> 00:27:08,559 this time I'm going to open the public hearing for Z16-0006 534 00:27:08,559 --> 00:27:10,000 . We'll call 535 00:27:10,000 --> 00:27:13,279 on the applicant to present your project. Please come 536 00:27:13,279 --> 00:27:14,759 forward and state your name 537 00:27:14,759 --> 00:27:19,279 and address and present your project. Grace Chang. I live 538 00:27:19,279 --> 00:27:21,119 in 204 Park Haven Drive, 539 00:27:21,119 --> 00:27:25,799 McKinney, Texas. Thank you. The project is going to be on 540 00:27:25,799 --> 00:27:29,599 903 McCormick, Denton, Texas. 541 00:27:30,079 --> 00:27:33,829 Do you have a presentation of your project you'd like to 542 00:27:33,829 --> 00:27:34,799 present or just 543 00:27:34,799 --> 00:27:38,599 speak? I don't have any presentations. I have some pictures 544 00:27:38,599 --> 00:27:40,039 of the streets but it 545 00:27:40,039 --> 00:27:43,960 seems like you guys been discussing the project in detail 546 00:27:43,960 --> 00:27:45,000 in the prior meeting 547 00:27:45,000 --> 00:27:48,480 so you're familiar with the neighborhood. It's already 548 00:27:48,480 --> 00:27:50,000 mostly apartments or 549 00:27:50,000 --> 00:27:54,039 people wanting to build apartments. So I would like to 550 00:27:54,039 --> 00:27:55,279 answer any questions 551 00:27:55,279 --> 00:27:58,059 you have and I'd like to share my building philosophy if 552 00:27:58,059 --> 00:27:58,920 anyone wants to 553 00:27:58,920 --> 00:28:04,200 hear about it. Sure. Commissioner Beck. Thank you Chair. 554 00:28:04,200 --> 00:28:06,359 Thank you for coming and 555 00:28:06,359 --> 00:28:10,589 I do just have one question because I there's always some 556 00:28:10,589 --> 00:28:12,759 concern by people 557 00:28:12,759 --> 00:28:15,710 out there that we're building a lot of apartments and I don 558 00:28:15,710 --> 00:28:16,240 't have a 559 00:28:16,240 --> 00:28:19,420 particular problem with apartments there but do you mind if 560 00:28:19,420 --> 00:28:20,200 I ask what your 561 00:28:20,200 --> 00:28:23,259 intention is to build? Are you building, it's obviously 562 00:28:23,259 --> 00:28:24,839 multifamily, but were you 563 00:28:24,839 --> 00:28:28,190 looking at something along like a four-plex or are you 564 00:28:28,190 --> 00:28:30,720 gonna do? I think by building code 565 00:28:30,720 --> 00:28:34,680 I can have maximum of 16 bedrooms in any combination. I 566 00:28:34,680 --> 00:28:36,279 think that's true. That's the 567 00:28:36,279 --> 00:28:40,599 limitation. I am looking for, I'm looking to build the best 568 00:28:40,599 --> 00:28:42,279 apartment possible so 569 00:28:42,279 --> 00:28:46,259 not necessarily maximizing the square footage or the number 570 00:28:46,259 --> 00:28:47,319 of bedrooms or the 571 00:28:47,319 --> 00:28:51,269 number of units but the best apartment possible. I own the 572 00:28:51,269 --> 00:28:53,559 house for over 10 573 00:28:53,559 --> 00:28:58,079 years now so I'm in a fortunate position of not having any 574 00:28:58,079 --> 00:28:59,440 debt on the house so I 575 00:28:59,440 --> 00:29:02,920 have a lot of equity so I can afford to sit on it and think 576 00:29:02,920 --> 00:29:04,680 about this. There's a 577 00:29:04,680 --> 00:29:07,759 reason I haven't tear down the house the last 10 years 578 00:29:07,759 --> 00:29:08,960 because I want to think 579 00:29:08,960 --> 00:29:12,789 about this and really build the right apartment for the 580 00:29:12,789 --> 00:29:14,619 site. Whenever I'm 581 00:29:14,619 --> 00:29:18,369 engaged in a building project I want to minimize the 582 00:29:18,369 --> 00:29:20,079 ultimate environmental 583 00:29:20,079 --> 00:29:26,079 impact. So by minimizing environmental impact it's not just 584 00:29:26,079 --> 00:29:27,319 say increasing the 585 00:29:27,319 --> 00:29:31,190 energy efficiency of a place which I do. I'm waiting to put 586 00:29:31,190 --> 00:29:32,640 in say solar lights 587 00:29:32,640 --> 00:29:37,079 which I did in my last project, phone insulation, tankless 588 00:29:37,079 --> 00:29:39,160 water heater, all of 589 00:29:39,160 --> 00:29:42,049 all of them actually exceed the building code, the current 590 00:29:42,049 --> 00:29:43,920 building code. So my goal 591 00:29:43,920 --> 00:29:47,670 is not just to satisfy the current code but to do the best 592 00:29:47,670 --> 00:29:49,119 project possible. So 593 00:29:49,119 --> 00:29:52,640 the best project may allow me only to build say four units 594 00:29:52,640 --> 00:29:53,960 but four very good 595 00:29:53,960 --> 00:29:58,200 units. It may allow me to do six units. I don't really know 596 00:29:58,200 --> 00:29:59,359 but I plan to work 597 00:29:59,359 --> 00:30:03,200 with the local architect Mark Martin and we will work 598 00:30:03,200 --> 00:30:05,680 together to think of 599 00:30:05,680 --> 00:30:08,750 something in the next one or two years. I don't think I'm 600 00:30:08,750 --> 00:30:10,680 in the building stage 601 00:30:10,680 --> 00:30:14,829 yet. I think it's going to be two years of planning this 602 00:30:14,829 --> 00:30:15,839 out so when I have 603 00:30:15,839 --> 00:30:20,630 more concrete idea I'll present it to you. Very good. Okay 604 00:30:20,630 --> 00:30:22,000 thank you so much. 605 00:30:22,359 --> 00:30:26,640 Any other questions for the applicant? 606 00:30:28,359 --> 00:30:31,519 Seeing none thank you very much for your presentation. 607 00:30:31,519 --> 00:30:34,640 Thank you. 608 00:30:35,359 --> 00:30:41,480 I'll call on Julie for staff presentation. 609 00:30:45,839 --> 00:30:54,430 All right just to provide a summary of the request before 610 00:30:54,430 --> 00:30:54,799 you. The 611 00:30:54,799 --> 00:31:00,509 request is to rezone about a third of an acre from DR1 to 612 00:31:00,509 --> 00:31:03,400 DR2. It's on Eagle and 613 00:31:03,400 --> 00:31:07,839 McCormick on that corner. The findings are that staff that 614 00:31:07,839 --> 00:31:08,000 the 615 00:31:08,000 --> 00:31:11,480 proposed DR2 district does conform to the future land use 616 00:31:11,480 --> 00:31:12,519 designation and it's 617 00:31:12,519 --> 00:31:16,960 also compatible with the existing land uses and the zoning. 618 00:31:16,960 --> 00:31:18,079 So staff does 619 00:31:18,079 --> 00:31:22,130 recommend approval of the request and I'll answer any 620 00:31:22,130 --> 00:31:23,000 questions. 621 00:31:27,000 --> 00:31:32,839 All right thank you. No questions thank you Julie. Again 622 00:31:32,839 --> 00:31:34,119 this is a public hearing. 623 00:31:34,119 --> 00:31:36,819 Anyone who would like to speak on this item please come 624 00:31:36,819 --> 00:31:38,079 forward at this time. I 625 00:31:38,079 --> 00:31:43,400 do have one card from Grace Chen. I believe spoke already 626 00:31:43,400 --> 00:31:44,279 obviously in 627 00:31:44,279 --> 00:31:49,869 support of the project so thank you for that. Again public 628 00:31:49,869 --> 00:31:50,799 hearing if there's 629 00:31:50,799 --> 00:31:54,160 anyone who would like to speak on this item please come 630 00:31:54,160 --> 00:31:55,480 forward at this time. 631 00:31:55,480 --> 00:31:59,089 Seeing none I will close the public hearing and I will open 632 00:31:59,089 --> 00:32:00,000 the floor for 633 00:32:00,000 --> 00:32:04,559 discussion or a motion. Commissioner Dudowitz. Having had a 634 00:32:04,559 --> 00:32:05,960 great presentation 635 00:32:05,960 --> 00:32:11,609 during our work session and noting that this rezoning is 636 00:32:11,609 --> 00:32:12,880 compatible with long 637 00:32:12,880 --> 00:32:17,319 range planning I would move to approve as recommended by 638 00:32:17,319 --> 00:32:19,240 staff. Commissioner Beck. 639 00:32:19,240 --> 00:32:25,099 I concur and second the motion. Second. Okay have a first 640 00:32:25,099 --> 00:32:26,039 and a second for 641 00:32:26,039 --> 00:32:34,529 approval. Any further discussion? Seeing none we'll call 642 00:32:34,529 --> 00:32:38,480 for a vote on the board. 643 00:32:43,920 --> 00:32:51,710 The motion to approve carries six to zero. That moves us to 644 00:32:51,710 --> 00:32:53,680 our final item on 645 00:32:53,680 --> 00:32:58,640 our agenda tonight our project matrix. So open the floor at 646 00:32:58,640 --> 00:32:59,319 this time for anyone 647 00:32:59,319 --> 00:33:03,890 who would like to put an item on our agenda consider in the 648 00:33:03,890 --> 00:33:04,599 future. 649 00:33:08,839 --> 00:33:10,630 Commissioner Beck you had a question during our work 650 00:33:10,630 --> 00:33:13,319 session about parks. 651 00:33:13,319 --> 00:33:19,759 You were asking about park dedications. We had talked about 652 00:33:19,759 --> 00:33:20,759 bringing it up at 653 00:33:20,759 --> 00:33:25,440 this time I don't know if you want to bring. I would like 654 00:33:25,440 --> 00:33:27,480 to raise an 655 00:33:27,480 --> 00:33:32,240 external development. Do I direct it at this one 656 00:33:32,240 --> 00:33:33,759 development or just in general? 657 00:33:33,759 --> 00:33:38,559 In general. Okay in general yeah about future housing 658 00:33:38,559 --> 00:33:39,440 development especially 659 00:33:39,440 --> 00:33:42,910 the further out they are about access to public parks and 660 00:33:42,910 --> 00:33:44,119 bike paths things like 661 00:33:44,119 --> 00:33:47,019 that. Okay and I think one of the other questions you'd ask 662 00:33:47,019 --> 00:33:48,160 about was park fees. 663 00:33:48,160 --> 00:33:52,619 Whether they make a contribution in dollars or a 664 00:33:52,619 --> 00:33:54,759 contribution in land and 665 00:33:54,759 --> 00:33:58,960 then any subsequent park fees that may be paid at building 666 00:33:58,960 --> 00:34:00,200 permit stage I think 667 00:34:00,200 --> 00:34:03,559 was another item that we discussed briefly to come back to 668 00:34:03,559 --> 00:34:04,279 this evening. 669 00:34:04,279 --> 00:34:10,099 Thank you so much for helping me. You did great. Anybody 670 00:34:10,099 --> 00:34:11,760 else have an item we would like to 671 00:34:11,760 --> 00:34:18,760 to put on our future agenda items? Just to clarify Chair 672 00:34:18,760 --> 00:34:20,159 person Strange regarding 673 00:34:20,159 --> 00:34:24,670 the park dedication park land requirements associated with 674 00:34:24,670 --> 00:34:25,719 development 675 00:34:25,719 --> 00:34:29,719 within the city. We do have an item on our agenda as to 676 00:34:29,719 --> 00:34:30,559 what are the park 677 00:34:30,559 --> 00:34:33,190 dedication plans throughout the city that is a 678 00:34:33,190 --> 00:34:35,239 comprehensive study and what we can 679 00:34:35,239 --> 00:34:37,900 do is provide the additional information that you've 680 00:34:37,900 --> 00:34:39,360 requested through that. We 681 00:34:39,360 --> 00:34:43,260 are trying to coordinate a date and time if you recall in 682 00:34:43,260 --> 00:34:44,639 your matrix it states 683 00:34:44,639 --> 00:34:47,000 that the Parks Department Parks and Rec Department is 684 00:34:47,000 --> 00:34:48,199 currently in the process 685 00:34:48,199 --> 00:34:53,500 of updating their master plan and we are hopeful to have a 686 00:34:53,500 --> 00:34:55,559 scope of services or 687 00:34:55,559 --> 00:34:58,449 study presented to you eminently and we will coordinate 688 00:34:58,449 --> 00:34:59,760 that activity with them 689 00:34:59,760 --> 00:35:05,199 shortly to make sure we have something that we can present. 690 00:35:05,199 --> 00:35:09,119 Anybody else? 691 00:35:09,360 --> 00:35:14,320 Okay seeing none I'm going to close our P&Z meeting tonight 692 00:35:14,320 --> 00:35:18,679 at 642. Thank you for coming.