WEBVTT

00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:12.800
 Okay, it is 903 and we have a quorum, so it's called to order the Public Utilities Board

00:00:12.800 --> 00:00:17.040
 meeting for the City of Denton on Monday, September 13th.

00:00:17.040 --> 00:00:22.400
 Before we go into public comment period, I'd like to welcome Mr. Larry Beck to the Public

00:00:22.400 --> 00:00:23.400
 Utilities Board.

00:00:23.400 --> 00:00:25.720
 He'll be a good addition.

00:00:25.720 --> 00:00:29.300
 Does anybody in the audience wish to speak?

00:00:29.300 --> 00:00:31.960
 Do we have anyone on the phone wishing to speak?

00:00:31.960 --> 00:00:34.960
 No, ma'am, no callers for today.

00:00:34.960 --> 00:00:36.020
 Thank you.

00:00:36.020 --> 00:00:39.320
 We have a closed session scheduled.

00:00:39.320 --> 00:00:43.760
 If there are any board members who want to go into closed session to ask questions about

00:00:43.760 --> 00:00:49.760
 item A that's on the consent agenda, does any board member wish to go into closed session?

00:00:49.760 --> 00:00:55.520
 Okay, seeing none, we don't need a closed session.

00:00:55.520 --> 00:01:00.440
 Do we have any board member who wishes to pull an item off of the consent agenda from

00:01:00.440 --> 00:01:03.040
 items A through J?

00:01:03.040 --> 00:01:05.680
 I see none.

00:01:05.680 --> 00:01:08.640
 Do we have a motion to approve items A through J?

00:01:08.640 --> 00:01:11.280
 I'll move approval.

00:01:11.280 --> 00:01:12.280
 Second.

00:01:12.280 --> 00:01:13.800
 All in favor say aye.

00:01:13.800 --> 00:01:14.800
 Aye.

00:01:14.800 --> 00:01:15.800
 Opposed?

00:01:15.800 --> 00:01:18.080
 That carries.

00:01:18.080 --> 00:01:22.440
 Item 3A, consider approval of the minutes from August 23rd, 2021.

00:01:22.440 --> 00:01:26.880
 Do we have any corrections or changes?

00:01:26.880 --> 00:01:29.240
 Do we have a motion to approve?

00:01:29.240 --> 00:01:31.880
 So moved.

00:01:31.880 --> 00:01:32.880
 Barbara moves.

00:01:32.880 --> 00:01:33.880
 Do we have a second?

00:01:33.880 --> 00:01:34.880
 Second.

00:01:34.880 --> 00:01:36.760
 All in favor say aye.

00:01:36.760 --> 00:01:37.760
 Aye.

00:01:37.760 --> 00:01:38.760
 Opposed?

00:01:38.760 --> 00:01:40.640
 That carries.

00:01:40.640 --> 00:01:44.280
 Item B, consider recommending the adoption of an ordinance for the city of Denton, a

00:01:44.280 --> 00:01:49.760
 Texas Home Rule Municipal Corporation, to execute a contract with Classic Chevrolet for light

00:01:49.760 --> 00:01:52.800
 duty trucks.

00:01:52.800 --> 00:01:58.600
 Good morning, board.

00:01:58.600 --> 00:01:59.600
 Morning.

00:01:59.600 --> 00:02:01.920
 My name is Terry Kader.

00:02:01.920 --> 00:02:12.720
 I'm figuring out how to share the screen here.

00:02:12.720 --> 00:02:20.480
 My name is Terry Kader.

00:02:20.480 --> 00:02:23.200
 I'm the fleet superintendent for the city of Denton.

00:02:23.200 --> 00:02:28.280
 This contract is a five-year contract for the purchase of light duty vehicles.

00:02:28.280 --> 00:02:38.880
 Light duty vehicles would include sedans up through one-ton trucks.

00:02:38.880 --> 00:02:46.200
 Just a little background on the current contract we have or the previous contract with a local

00:02:46.200 --> 00:02:57.080
 vendor here, James Wood, and we purchased approximately 35 units annually off the contract.

00:02:57.080 --> 00:03:01.640
 Over the life of that contract, we purchased approximately 100 vehicles and we anticipate

00:03:01.640 --> 00:03:05.000
 pretty similar on this new contract as well.

00:03:05.000 --> 00:03:11.840
 This contract, the previous contract did not include police pursuit vehicles, TAHOs, and

00:03:11.840 --> 00:03:17.560
 we began purchasing General Motors products in about the year 2010, so we've been standardized

00:03:17.560 --> 00:03:23.660
 to GM for the last 11 years.

00:03:23.660 --> 00:03:28.200
 Just some examples of light duty vehicles that would be your pickup trucks.

00:03:28.200 --> 00:03:31.680
 They could be with a regular pickup or they could have utility beds.

00:03:31.680 --> 00:03:36.320
 Some of the lighter platforms of one-ton can carry utility beds as well.

00:03:36.320 --> 00:03:44.520
 Sedans, electric vehicles, hybrids, the police TAHO on this particular contract has included

00:03:44.520 --> 00:03:49.360
 support vehicles for the fire department, and then any other sedans or trucks that the

00:03:49.360 --> 00:03:50.360
 city uses.

00:03:50.360 --> 00:03:56.280
 There's a picture there of a new Equinox that was just purchased for the police department.

00:03:56.280 --> 00:04:06.240
 I wanted to go over a couple of advantages for having a contract like this, and I think

00:04:06.240 --> 00:04:10.560
 one of the biggest advantages is that it reduces the time for procurement.

00:04:10.560 --> 00:04:11.560
 Yes, sir.

00:04:11.560 --> 00:04:12.560
 Yes, sir.

00:04:12.560 --> 00:04:13.560
 I have a quick question.

00:04:13.560 --> 00:04:19.640
 What's the current make-up of the fleet in terms of cars, sedans, trucks, SUVs, or do

00:04:19.640 --> 00:04:21.180
 you have that information?

00:04:21.180 --> 00:04:24.720
 I don't have the exact numbers in front of me.

00:04:24.720 --> 00:04:32.840
 It's a variety, probably a lot more trucks and SUVs currently than there are sedans.

00:04:32.840 --> 00:04:37.960
 We'll see in the future, a lot of automakers are ceasing production of sedans.

00:04:37.960 --> 00:04:41.720
 We're going to see a lot more pickup trucks and a lot more utility vehicles as well as

00:04:41.720 --> 00:04:45.920
 a lot more electric EV platforms become available.

00:04:45.920 --> 00:04:49.240
 Thank you.

00:04:49.240 --> 00:04:55.520
 For procurement time, a lot of our departments are in high need of having their vehicles

00:04:55.520 --> 00:05:00.320
 replaced and over the last two years since COVID had, it's been a struggle.

00:05:00.320 --> 00:05:06.200
 It's not business as usual and this next purchasing cycle won't be any different.

00:05:06.200 --> 00:05:12.680
 Automakers are still struggling to get the chips needed to build the vehicles and just

00:05:12.680 --> 00:05:19.020
 having a contract is going to help that in the fact that the vendors have already reached

00:05:19.020 --> 00:05:22.840
 out to us to get an idea of how many vehicles and what type of vehicles we're going to

00:05:22.840 --> 00:05:24.540
 purchase this year.

00:05:24.540 --> 00:05:29.440
 So they have an allocation and our vehicles are already included in that allocation so

00:05:29.440 --> 00:05:35.080
 we don't have to wait until, we don't have to wonder if there's going to be build spots

00:05:35.080 --> 00:05:38.680
 left for the vehicles that we want so that's a big plus.

00:05:38.680 --> 00:05:44.240
 This contract also includes discounts for parts and repair services, body shop services,

00:05:44.240 --> 00:05:49.400
 these are things that we would normally send out anyway to the local vendors and of course

00:05:49.400 --> 00:05:54.200
 the standardization of the fleet is important because it just creates efficiencies through

00:05:54.200 --> 00:05:59.320
 training, through having parts on the shelf for the vehicles and the need for specialized

00:05:59.320 --> 00:06:05.600
 tools and equipment to include diagnostics and that type thing.

00:06:05.600 --> 00:06:10.380
 This contract includes all available GM models and future models will be added to the contract

00:06:10.380 --> 00:06:15.720
 as they become available right now so that trucks, vans, SUVs and electric vehicles are

00:06:15.720 --> 00:06:17.200
 all part of the contract.

00:06:17.200 --> 00:06:27.920
 It is a three-year contract with two one-year renewal periods and the discount for body shop

00:06:27.920 --> 00:06:33.400
 work is 15% for parts and labor on body repairs and we send a significant amount of those

00:06:33.400 --> 00:06:38.520
 out for repairs since we don't have the capability to perform those services in-house.

00:06:38.520 --> 00:06:44.640
 We think we're going to purchase probably 40 vehicles annually and spend just an average

00:06:44.640 --> 00:06:52.320
 of 1.2 million, of course that all depends on the five-year replacement schedule which

00:06:52.320 --> 00:06:58.820
 vehicles become eligible for replacement and then as the departments determine their needs

00:06:58.820 --> 00:07:05.980
 what vehicles will be added to the fleet so we've included a slide here showing the planned

00:07:05.980 --> 00:07:11.040
 replacements for this next coming year and if you do the math you'll see it doesn't

00:07:11.040 --> 00:07:15.800
 add up to 1.2 million because some of this contract is maintenance or repair, some of

00:07:15.800 --> 00:07:21.520
 the contract is additions that I don't have, those will have to be approved before we can

00:07:21.520 --> 00:07:29.840
 add them to the list and it also includes lower amounts in the initial terms of the

00:07:29.840 --> 00:07:34.040
 contract because we all know prices will increase over the next five years so initially we won't

00:07:34.040 --> 00:07:38.760
 be spending that 1.2 but at the end of the contract we're probably overall six million

00:07:38.760 --> 00:07:45.000
 dollars and that's only if we need to spend that, that we're not obligated to spend it's

00:07:45.000 --> 00:07:52.200
 only as departments need so I included a slide on the replacement criteria because that's

00:07:52.200 --> 00:07:59.160
 always a point of interest and in our replacement most of our sedans and light trucks in this

00:07:59.160 --> 00:08:05.800
 category are ten-year life cycles, our police patrol vehicles are in seven-year life cycle.

00:08:05.800 --> 00:08:10.040
 I'm not so concerned about the age of the vehicle, I'm more concerned about the maintenance

00:08:10.040 --> 00:08:17.800
 cost of the vehicle so age isn't a very high weight factor for us in fleet but mileage

00:08:17.800 --> 00:08:22.540
 and maintenance costs are so these are trigger points that tell us it's time to take a look

00:08:22.540 --> 00:08:28.800
 at replacing that particular vehicle and we try to get 100,000 miles out of a typical

00:08:28.800 --> 00:08:32.000
 truck and 130 out of a police vehicle.

00:08:32.000 --> 00:08:36.320
 We will typically do that on patrol units because they run a lot.

00:08:36.320 --> 00:08:40.960
 We may not reach the life cycle in pickups and sedans necessarily or when we do it's

00:08:40.960 --> 00:08:45.680
 going to be over the ten-year life span which is okay as long as we can still procure parts

00:08:45.680 --> 00:08:52.020
 for that unit and as long as the maintenance points aren't over five so in our fleet system

00:08:52.020 --> 00:08:59.280
 it tracks cost of vehicles and the life cycle cost for maintenance is zero to ten points

00:08:59.280 --> 00:09:04.720
 and at five that's the place on the curve where it's advantageous to start looking

00:09:04.720 --> 00:09:08.400
 at replacing that vehicle once it gets up towards eight or ten points you're really

00:09:08.400 --> 00:09:12.640
 putting more money into maintenance than you should be and you should look at replacing

00:09:12.640 --> 00:09:18.600
 that or you should have already replaced it so that's kind of our criteria.

00:09:18.600 --> 00:09:23.600
 Five points represents half of the initial cost of the vehicle in case you're wondering

00:09:23.600 --> 00:09:24.600
 about that.

00:09:24.600 --> 00:09:25.600
 Question?

00:09:25.600 --> 00:09:26.600
 Yes.

00:09:26.600 --> 00:09:38.960
 How do you decide, let's see, how do you decide what you get, what goes electric, what stays?

00:09:38.960 --> 00:09:39.960
 That's a great question.

00:09:39.960 --> 00:09:45.320
 So the first thing we look at is the needs of the department and what platforms or vehicle

00:09:45.320 --> 00:09:50.480
 that will are available that will suit their particular needs and then the next thing we

00:09:50.480 --> 00:09:59.000
 look at is the engine driveline and the actual platform hybrid or electric so if the department

00:09:59.000 --> 00:10:03.920
 has a need for a certain type of vehicle and it is available as an electric or a hybrid

00:10:03.920 --> 00:10:07.720
 we will definitely take a look at that and we'll have a committee that's put together

00:10:07.720 --> 00:10:15.480
 to look at each purchase and see and then the committee will be made up of various department

00:10:15.480 --> 00:10:21.440
 personnel as well so we'll be taking a look at the purchase and see what suits the needs

00:10:21.440 --> 00:10:27.880
 of the department, what's available and then can we go electric with it because electric

00:10:27.880 --> 00:10:34.400
 vehicles are going to be the future and a lot of that depends too on our charging capability.

00:10:34.400 --> 00:10:40.840
 What is, would you know, what is the policy about the employee taking home?

00:10:40.840 --> 00:10:46.200
 I understand the wisdom of having a police and take his police car home because I think

00:10:46.200 --> 00:10:51.640
 that is a deterrence but how do you decide within the department who takes their vehicle

00:10:51.640 --> 00:10:56.040
 home and who just drives to work and gets in the city vehicle?

00:10:56.040 --> 00:10:59.760
 The fleet department doesn't necessarily make that decision that's left up to the departments

00:10:59.760 --> 00:11:05.240
 but primarily it's police and fire right now, there are some departments that have to respond

00:11:05.240 --> 00:11:10.720
 when they're called out, water and electric has some take home vehicles but it's limited,

00:11:10.720 --> 00:11:15.800
 it's limited to those people that are on call for a particular incident so the majority

00:11:15.800 --> 00:11:19.800
 of take home vehicles in the city are emergency type vehicles.

00:11:19.800 --> 00:11:21.200
 Thank you.

00:11:21.200 --> 00:11:22.200
 Billy?

00:11:22.200 --> 00:11:23.200
 Yes sir.

00:11:23.200 --> 00:11:28.440
 I guess my question is about moving to classic from James Woods, how did that happen?

00:11:28.440 --> 00:11:32.520
 Well when we put the bid out we submitted it to four different dealerships within the

00:11:32.520 --> 00:11:40.040
 city of Denton and I think a lot of it had to do with timing and the fact that the auto

00:11:40.040 --> 00:11:44.680
 manufacturers are still up and near about what they're going to manufacture and how

00:11:44.680 --> 00:11:51.640
 many they're going to manufacture so my understanding was that when we put the bid out the pricing

00:11:51.640 --> 00:11:56.800
 for next year 2022 models hadn't even been given to the manufacturers yet, it wasn't

00:11:56.800 --> 00:12:02.720
 right to the very end before the bid could be submitted but our local dealer chose not

00:12:02.720 --> 00:12:04.400
 to submit a bid this time.

00:12:04.400 --> 00:12:05.400
 Okay.

00:12:05.400 --> 00:12:06.800
 Well that makes that easy.

00:12:06.800 --> 00:12:07.800
 Yeah.

00:12:07.800 --> 00:12:08.800
 Yes sir.

00:12:08.800 --> 00:12:11.720
 Where is classic based?

00:12:11.720 --> 00:12:19.760
 Classic is in Grapevine I think, Richardson I believe, Grapevine, yes sir.

00:12:19.760 --> 00:12:26.080
 We, that's it for the presentation, I'll be happy to answer any other questions, yes

00:12:26.080 --> 00:12:27.080
 sir.

00:12:27.080 --> 00:12:36.240
 This purchase is based on the needs for what you currently, can you hear me okay, I better,

00:12:36.240 --> 00:12:41.840
 I've always been guilty of that, based on what you currently have in stock or does this

00:12:41.840 --> 00:12:45.960
 look at future needs as we grow, is that.

00:12:45.960 --> 00:12:51.200
 This does have vehicles added in for future needs but it also primarily looked at our

00:12:51.200 --> 00:12:55.440
 five-year replacement plan that we currently have so we looked at the next five years what's

00:12:55.440 --> 00:13:01.040
 becoming eligible and then we know about what the fleet growth has been in the past and

00:13:01.040 --> 00:13:04.400
 that's what I used to predict, how many units we might add to the fleet in the future and

00:13:04.400 --> 00:13:06.520
 we put that in there as well.

00:13:06.520 --> 00:13:07.520
 Thank you.

00:13:07.520 --> 00:13:08.520
 More questions.

00:13:08.520 --> 00:13:13.640
 Madam Chair, before we move on I just wanted to recognize Terry and his staff, you know

00:13:13.640 --> 00:13:19.000
 they recently recognized, they received a gold level award for the Clean Cities Coalition,

00:13:19.000 --> 00:13:23.160
 this is the second year in a row so I think the City of Denton does a really good job

00:13:23.160 --> 00:13:28.560
 of making sure we're aware of the environmental impacts that our fleet has on the local region,

00:13:28.560 --> 00:13:29.560
 so.

00:13:29.560 --> 00:13:31.000
 That's wonderful, congratulations.

00:13:31.000 --> 00:13:32.800
 Thank you very much.

00:13:32.800 --> 00:13:40.800
 All right, do we have a motion to approve item B?

00:13:40.800 --> 00:13:41.800
 So moved.

00:13:41.800 --> 00:13:42.800
 Okay, we move.

00:13:42.800 --> 00:13:43.800
 Second.

00:13:43.800 --> 00:13:44.800
 Devin seconds.

00:13:44.800 --> 00:13:48.560
 All in favor say aye.

00:13:48.560 --> 00:13:49.560
 Aye.

00:13:49.560 --> 00:13:50.560
 Opposed?

00:13:50.560 --> 00:13:51.840
 That carries.

00:13:51.840 --> 00:13:56.000
 BMC, consider recommending the adoption of an ordinance with the City of Denton, a Texas

00:13:56.000 --> 00:14:01.400
 Home Rule Corporation, authorizing the City Manager to execute a contract with Primors

00:14:01.400 --> 00:14:04.480
 T&D Services LLC.

00:14:04.480 --> 00:14:07.920
 Good morning.

00:14:07.920 --> 00:14:11.040
 Good morning.

00:14:11.040 --> 00:14:22.680
 Good morning.

00:14:22.680 --> 00:14:52.440
 Well, I'm trying to get it to go bigger.

00:14:52.440 --> 00:15:08.120
 Good morning, I'm Brad Watts, Operations and Maintenance Line Division Manager and this

00:15:08.120 --> 00:15:14.480
 morning I wanted to talk to you, give a presentation about our overhead maintenance construction

00:15:14.480 --> 00:15:19.760
 contract and my glasses are going to fog up so I might have to step back or pull them

00:15:19.760 --> 00:15:26.600
 down, but I'll give it my best shot.

00:15:26.600 --> 00:15:30.440
 First I'm going to give you a little bit of background, you know, about our overhead contract.

00:15:30.440 --> 00:15:36.280
 We currently are just, you know, came out of a contract that was our overhead construction

00:15:36.280 --> 00:15:41.280
 and maintenance contract and now we're, you know, trying to renew a new one and that's

00:15:41.280 --> 00:15:47.360
 going to supplement our in-house staff force with qualified personnel and some things that

00:15:47.360 --> 00:15:53.640
 kind of drive, you know, having a contract with a contractor would be emergency response,

00:15:53.640 --> 00:16:00.120
 large projects and unfortunately now staff shortages with COVID, you know, employees

00:16:00.120 --> 00:16:06.400
 being sick or having to be quarantined and then, you know, back on the emergency response,

00:16:06.400 --> 00:16:12.240
 you know, a prime example is, you know, Louisiana, Mississippi and the coast with the hurricanes.

00:16:12.240 --> 00:16:16.440
 We don't get them up here, knock on wood, but we do have ice storms and, you know, we

00:16:16.440 --> 00:16:22.000
 can get remnants of a hurricane and then the City of Denton, the RFP, requested a full

00:16:22.000 --> 00:16:27.800
 service contractor capable of providing overhead line construction and maintenance services.

00:16:27.800 --> 00:16:33.320
 These services will include, but are not limited to, installation of new or replacement of

00:16:33.320 --> 00:16:40.600
 existing overhead and underground electrical facilities on the system.

00:16:40.600 --> 00:16:47.520
 All electrical construction material will be provided by the City of Denton.

00:16:47.520 --> 00:16:53.160
 And back on the main utilization of this contract will be pole replacements.

00:16:53.160 --> 00:16:59.600
 Currently in, well, in 2019, DME initiated a pole inspections project that inspected

00:16:59.600 --> 00:17:06.920
 the existing 12,000 poles within DME's infrastructure that's supporting the 352 miles of overhead

00:17:06.920 --> 00:17:09.080
 conductor.

00:17:09.080 --> 00:17:15.600
 These poles that are on our system, they range from installation from the 1960s to current

00:17:15.600 --> 00:17:17.520
 time.

00:17:17.520 --> 00:17:24.600
 So far, we've inspected around 75% of our overhead infrastructure to date and we have

00:17:24.600 --> 00:17:34.360
 identified 1,199 poles to be replaced, having replaced 170 so far of those poles.

00:17:34.360 --> 00:17:40.720
 The overhead construction lines make up 43% of DME's infrastructure.

00:17:40.720 --> 00:17:45.280
 The other remaining, of course, is the underground.

00:17:45.280 --> 00:17:51.000
 And this is some pictures of our poles that we've replaced and a good, good picture will

00:17:51.000 --> 00:17:53.600
 be the picture on the right.

00:17:53.600 --> 00:17:57.760
 When they're inspecting poles, they're not just inspecting from the ground up, they're

00:17:57.760 --> 00:18:02.880
 inspecting from the ground down because the ground down is usually where you're going

00:18:02.880 --> 00:18:11.800
 to have the damage on your poles, where, whether it be rot or insect infestation on it or just,

00:18:11.800 --> 00:18:13.480
 just a bad pole.

00:18:13.480 --> 00:18:19.000
 And that's a really a good picture of what that'll look like when we find them.

00:18:19.000 --> 00:18:23.040
 And with this, we're seeking approval of a contract for the supply of overhead electric

00:18:23.040 --> 00:18:28.600
 lines construction and maintenance services for the city of Denton with Primor's T&D services

00:18:28.600 --> 00:18:34.080
 for five years and the not to exceed amount of $15 million.

00:18:34.080 --> 00:18:38.880
 And of that $15 million, I mean, we've got different types of poles out there.

00:18:38.880 --> 00:18:44.560
 We've got single phase, B phase, three phase, which is one, two, or three phases.

00:18:44.560 --> 00:18:49.280
 And every pole can be unique as far as changing it out, as far as getting just a price to

00:18:49.280 --> 00:18:50.840
 change that pole out.

00:18:50.840 --> 00:18:57.000
 It's going to vary based on, is it in a back alley, is it up on the street, or what all's

00:18:57.000 --> 00:19:02.040
 on there, cable, cable TV, telephone, transformer services.

00:19:02.040 --> 00:19:07.640
 I mean, it varies, you know, greatly, but with that, I'll answer any questions y'all

00:19:07.640 --> 00:19:08.640
 might have.

00:19:08.640 --> 00:19:09.640
 Yes, sir.

00:19:09.640 --> 00:19:10.640
 I have a question.

00:19:10.640 --> 00:19:11.640
 Yes, sir.

00:19:11.640 --> 00:19:14.520
 You said you, in your presentation, you replaced 170 poles so far.

00:19:14.520 --> 00:19:15.520
 Yes, sir.

00:19:15.520 --> 00:19:20.600
 Out of 1200 out of a 75% inspection rate.

00:19:20.600 --> 00:19:26.720
 So I'm curious what pace you intend to replace the poles at if you have that many to replace.

00:19:26.720 --> 00:19:29.520
 Over this three to five-year period?

00:19:29.520 --> 00:19:30.520
 That's a good question.

00:19:30.520 --> 00:19:36.220
 We, when they, when the pole inspector gives us the inspections, it's broken down, it kind

00:19:36.220 --> 00:19:42.600
 of rates them from really bad, which we call priority, to another type of a priority pole,

00:19:42.600 --> 00:19:45.680
 which is not as bad, and then it goes down from there.

00:19:45.680 --> 00:19:50.240
 The pole's working, it's not a danger pole, and currently the priority pole, that's number

00:19:50.240 --> 00:19:53.200
 one on our list, and so we stay on top of those.

00:19:53.200 --> 00:19:54.880
 I mean, they're changed out immediately.

00:19:54.880 --> 00:20:00.120
 When we get the inspections report, and we get them weekly, the crews are sent out, whether

00:20:00.120 --> 00:20:05.760
 it was a contractor or an in-house crew, the pole is changed out right then.

00:20:05.760 --> 00:20:10.880
 I mean, we get it off the system, and we'll also rank them down from that.

00:20:10.880 --> 00:20:17.280
 I mean, from priority down to the least, you know, that's not dangerous.

00:20:17.280 --> 00:20:23.600
 And so we'll, we work backwards on that from our really bad poles to not as bad poles.

00:20:23.600 --> 00:20:27.280
 And to answer your question, as far as how fast, as fast as we can do it, I mean, because

00:20:27.280 --> 00:20:28.280
 it's...

00:20:28.280 --> 00:20:31.840
 Well, I'm just curious, because if you've identified roughly 1,200 so far, and you've

00:20:31.840 --> 00:20:38.360
 only replaced 170, I don't know what percentage of that 1,200 you consider priority.

00:20:38.360 --> 00:20:45.200
 I would say, out of the, I probably, well, I mean, it would be really low percentage,

00:20:45.200 --> 00:20:51.120
 because we've only identified, I think the number's 30 priority poles that were just

00:20:51.120 --> 00:20:55.680
 dangerous poles, and then from there out, I don't have those numbers, but I can get

00:20:55.680 --> 00:20:56.680
 them for you.

00:20:56.680 --> 00:21:05.120
 Just from my own thinking, so you looked at the 1,200 poles and replaced 170, and you've

00:21:05.120 --> 00:21:12.680
 got 30 more to do, so that's 200, so that's about, what, 1,615 percent, thereabouts?

00:21:12.680 --> 00:21:13.840
 Yes, sir.

00:21:13.840 --> 00:21:14.840
 Okay.

00:21:14.840 --> 00:21:15.840
 Thank you.

00:21:15.840 --> 00:21:21.440
 Oh, button.

00:21:21.440 --> 00:21:25.080
 There you go.

00:21:25.080 --> 00:21:27.160
 Thank you, Chair.

00:21:27.160 --> 00:21:33.200
 So, we have 12,000 poles, and you said you've inspected 75 percent of the infrastructure?

00:21:33.200 --> 00:21:34.200
 Yes, sir.

00:21:34.200 --> 00:21:37.120
 So 8,000, 8,000 have been inspected?

00:21:37.120 --> 00:21:42.280
 And is, like, expected life, like, 50 years or 30 years?

00:21:42.280 --> 00:21:47.120
 Usually, I mean, that can range, I mean, depending on the soil and things like that, you know,

00:21:47.120 --> 00:21:51.360
 how much moisture is on the pole, but I mean, a good number is 30 to 35 years is what a

00:21:51.360 --> 00:21:52.360
 pole will last.

00:21:52.360 --> 00:21:58.080
 Okay, and I guess, I mean, in the last 20 years, we've replaced hundreds or 1,000 poles,

00:21:58.080 --> 00:22:05.120
 I guess, over, as needed, this seems like it's an ongoing, you know, a never-ending

00:22:05.120 --> 00:22:06.120
 process.

00:22:06.120 --> 00:22:07.120
 It is.

00:22:07.120 --> 00:22:12.960
 I mean, every year, you want to inspect some 10 percent of your poles or, you know, some

00:22:12.960 --> 00:22:17.760
 amount of your poles, and then you're going to be replacing, of those 12,000 poles, you

00:22:17.760 --> 00:22:23.920
 can say in 30 or 40 years, you're going to replace all 12,000, so you expect to replace

00:22:23.920 --> 00:22:27.120
 whatever that is, 500 a year.

00:22:27.120 --> 00:22:28.120
 That's very possible.

00:22:28.120 --> 00:22:32.360
 Yeah, and part of this is, as the city's grown, that pole was installed 20 years ago

00:22:32.360 --> 00:22:38.400
 or 30 years ago, they're just now starting to age out as like, as kind of areas of the

00:22:38.400 --> 00:22:41.960
 city have expanded.

00:22:41.960 --> 00:22:49.960
 If it's going to be a permanent ongoing process, would it be better over time for the city

00:22:49.960 --> 00:22:55.320
 to just expand its staff and take this work on, you know, and this can be in a five or

00:22:55.320 --> 00:23:00.800
 10-year period, but if we're going to be replacing 100 poles a year, 200 poles a year, 500 poles

00:23:00.800 --> 00:23:06.280
 a year, you know, in five years from now, could we have a plan to have enough staff

00:23:06.280 --> 00:23:10.440
 to do the inspections and do the replacements in-house?

00:23:10.440 --> 00:23:13.440
 Good question, Mr. Taylor.

00:23:13.440 --> 00:23:16.360
 I'm Chris Ludrick, the executive manager of operations.

00:23:16.360 --> 00:23:22.400
 So one thing that we should state is this pole inspection task that we took on is new.

00:23:22.400 --> 00:23:23.920
 We have not done that in the past.

00:23:23.920 --> 00:23:28.880
 There was not a pole inspection program in place, so we were more of a reactive.

00:23:28.880 --> 00:23:31.200
 So we would have a pole break.

00:23:31.200 --> 00:23:34.740
 We had the infamous windstorm of Bonnie Bray that took down the entire line, and then we

00:23:34.740 --> 00:23:35.920
 would go repair it.

00:23:35.920 --> 00:23:41.180
 So to be more proactive, we hired a company that's actually doing the pole inspections

00:23:41.180 --> 00:23:43.800
 for us, and that will be periodic going forward.

00:23:43.800 --> 00:23:46.440
 So maybe you only need it every five years.

00:23:46.440 --> 00:23:50.520
 But this first allotment of this 1,200 poles, that's because we looked at every pole in

00:23:50.520 --> 00:23:53.720
 the city, even ones that have been in the ground for a year.

00:23:53.720 --> 00:23:58.320
 So to give us a benchmark, so we'll bring in this contractor to get this big, you know,

00:23:58.320 --> 00:24:03.880
 this big glut of backlogged bad poles out of the way, then going forward, it would be much

00:24:03.880 --> 00:24:05.400
 more manageable.

00:24:05.400 --> 00:24:11.280
 And Brad's guys, if they do have time, so if there's staff available, we can change out

00:24:11.280 --> 00:24:12.280
 the poles ourselves.

00:24:12.280 --> 00:24:16.960
 But we'll elect to use the contractor to carry the bulk of this so that our maintenance crews

00:24:16.960 --> 00:24:19.120
 aren't tied up all the time working on that.

00:24:19.120 --> 00:24:23.200
 But yes, definitely going forward, it should be a much more manageable task that we can

00:24:23.200 --> 00:24:26.120
 take care of in-house.

00:24:26.120 --> 00:24:27.120
 Thank you.

00:24:27.120 --> 00:24:28.120
 You're welcome.

00:24:28.120 --> 00:24:29.120
 Go ahead.

00:24:29.120 --> 00:24:30.120
 Thank you.

00:24:30.120 --> 00:24:36.960
 Kind of as a corollary to Mr. Taylor's concern, has your department weighed the merits and

00:24:36.960 --> 00:24:43.160
 cost of treated wood posts as opposed to metal posts?

00:24:43.160 --> 00:24:44.920
 I couldn't hear all the questions.

00:24:44.920 --> 00:24:53.160
 Has your department weighed the merits and cost of treated wood posts versus metal posts?

00:24:53.160 --> 00:24:54.160
 Would there be?

00:24:54.160 --> 00:24:59.280
 That would be an engineering question that I'm in the industry, I mean, that's an ongoing

00:24:59.280 --> 00:25:05.440
 question that's been supported, but that would be an engineering question, and we'll certainly

00:25:05.440 --> 00:25:06.440
 get that for you.

00:25:06.440 --> 00:25:12.640
 Okay, but there's nothing just at the top of your head that says one's better than the

00:25:12.640 --> 00:25:13.640
 other?

00:25:13.640 --> 00:25:16.000
 Yes, sir, Mr. Beck.

00:25:16.000 --> 00:25:21.720
 So the costs are significantly more for the metal poles than they are for the wooden poles.

00:25:21.720 --> 00:25:23.360
 The initial cost or the overall?

00:25:23.360 --> 00:25:29.000
 The initial cost, and you also have to remember that those, unless you put galvanized poles

00:25:29.000 --> 00:25:33.680
 everywhere, which is not the standard in distribution because it's very unsightly, that those poles

00:25:33.680 --> 00:25:34.880
 also rust as well.

00:25:34.880 --> 00:25:38.340
 So they have a life expectancy just like the wood poles.

00:25:38.340 --> 00:25:43.480
 So the wood poles are very easy for our guys to work, and as we try to maintain a 30-minute

00:25:43.480 --> 00:25:48.040
 outage on repairing those poles, they're just very easy to work with.

00:25:48.040 --> 00:25:57.080
 So they are by far the industry standard electric guys talking in the lights, I believe.

00:25:57.080 --> 00:25:59.080
 Another question.

00:25:59.080 --> 00:26:04.160
 Another question separate from that, I'm assuming just based on my observation that as new developments

00:26:04.160 --> 00:26:08.360
 come in, we don't do the above-ground electrical, it all goes underground, is that correct?

00:26:08.360 --> 00:26:09.360
 That is correct.

00:26:09.360 --> 00:26:12.160
 All new construction for residential is underground.

00:26:12.160 --> 00:26:19.960
 Any thought to replacing what we got above ground to underground as it allows, as conditions

00:26:19.960 --> 00:26:20.960
 allow?

00:26:20.960 --> 00:26:21.960
 Yes, sir.

00:26:21.960 --> 00:26:22.960
 We do.

00:26:22.960 --> 00:26:25.600
 The cost difference is significant, maybe three times.

00:26:25.600 --> 00:26:28.400
 So we would take budgetary constraints in mind.

00:26:28.400 --> 00:26:29.680
 We also take reliability.

00:26:29.680 --> 00:26:35.280
 So if a circuit in our Kings Row area, that part of town, a lot of those lines are in

00:26:35.280 --> 00:26:36.280
 the backyards.

00:26:36.280 --> 00:26:38.120
 They're very hard for us to get to.

00:26:38.120 --> 00:26:42.120
 So those are things that we do consider as far as, "Hey, when we replace this line, do

00:26:42.120 --> 00:26:43.840
 we need to put it underground?"

00:26:43.840 --> 00:26:48.560
 Unfortunately, some of the construction techniques where you have fences backing up to fence

00:26:48.560 --> 00:26:53.040
 and that line runs in the back, it's not very conducive to put it in an underground circuit

00:26:53.040 --> 00:26:57.600
 because all of those houses are fed overhead, you would have to convert every service for

00:26:57.600 --> 00:26:58.600
 every house.

00:26:58.600 --> 00:27:04.760
 So it is definitely something we look at and we actually do have a budgetary category that

00:27:04.760 --> 00:27:09.640
 we put in our budget every year to transition some existing overhead to underground.

00:27:09.640 --> 00:27:12.400
 Right now the logistics of it makes it pretty difficult.

00:27:12.400 --> 00:27:13.400
 Yes, sir.

00:27:13.400 --> 00:27:14.400
 That's correct.

00:27:14.400 --> 00:27:15.400
 Thank you.

00:27:15.400 --> 00:27:18.280
 Well, Mr. Beck also pointed out that the council did ask us to look at potentially undergrounding

00:27:18.280 --> 00:27:20.320
 certain areas of the city.

00:27:20.320 --> 00:27:23.880
 We are currently working through that and do plan to have a report back to the council.

00:27:23.880 --> 00:27:30.280
 We'll also share with the PUB sometime before the end of this month.

00:27:30.280 --> 00:27:34.080
 Just understand that it'll be a big ticket item.

00:27:34.080 --> 00:27:38.600
 But again, it was a response to one of the council priorities I think from a year ago

00:27:38.600 --> 00:27:41.960
 that we're still working on, but we'll get that to you.

00:27:41.960 --> 00:27:48.360
 I think it was just a few years ago that you redid Southridge, you replaced all the lines

00:27:48.360 --> 00:27:49.360
 out there.

00:27:49.360 --> 00:27:50.360
 Yes, ma'am.

00:27:50.360 --> 00:27:52.480
 If I'm remembering correctly.

00:27:52.480 --> 00:27:54.520
 All right.

00:27:54.520 --> 00:27:57.840
 Any other questions?

00:27:57.840 --> 00:28:02.280
 Do we have a motion to approve item C?

00:28:02.280 --> 00:28:03.280
 So move.

00:28:03.280 --> 00:28:04.280
 Thank you, Devin.

00:28:04.280 --> 00:28:05.280
 I'll second.

00:28:05.280 --> 00:28:06.280
 Okay.

00:28:06.280 --> 00:28:07.280
 Larry seconded.

00:28:07.280 --> 00:28:08.280
 All in favor say aye.

00:28:08.280 --> 00:28:09.280
 Aye.

00:28:09.280 --> 00:28:10.280
 Opposed?

00:28:10.280 --> 00:28:11.700
 Motion carries.

00:28:11.700 --> 00:28:16.240
 Consider recommending the approval of an ordinance amending the city's fund balance policy related

00:28:16.240 --> 00:28:19.440
 to the utility fund reserve levels.

00:28:19.440 --> 00:28:22.400
 Good morning, Chair, PB members, Nick Vincent, Assistant Director of Finance.

00:28:22.400 --> 00:28:26.560
 I'll do my best to talk as loud as possible with this mask on.

00:28:26.560 --> 00:28:42.080
 Okay, so welcome to Mr. Beck, glad to have you on the Public Utilities Board to continue

00:28:42.080 --> 00:28:45.160
 our conversations regarding the fiscal year 2021-2022 budget.

00:28:45.160 --> 00:28:47.280
 A little bit of recap.

00:28:47.280 --> 00:28:51.920
 So if the PB or members, we did complete a detailed fund balance analysis this spring

00:28:51.920 --> 00:28:55.280
 of the city's fund balance policy for the utilities.

00:28:55.280 --> 00:28:59.280
 Based on that result of that study, we were looking to increase the reserve requirement

00:28:59.280 --> 00:29:02.680
 for the electric utility, and that's what today's conversation is focused on.

00:29:02.680 --> 00:29:05.520
 Sir, could you speak up or move the microphone up?

00:29:05.520 --> 00:29:06.520
 Let me.

00:29:06.520 --> 00:29:07.520
 Thank you.

00:29:07.520 --> 00:29:08.520
 Can you hear me better, Mr. Rybak?

00:29:08.520 --> 00:29:09.520
 All right.

00:29:09.520 --> 00:29:16.680
 Let me speak up a little bit.

00:29:16.680 --> 00:29:19.720
 And if you didn't, Mr. Rybak, if you didn't hear me, I can repeat what I said.

00:29:19.720 --> 00:29:24.120
 So in the spring of this year, we completed a detailed analysis for the utilities fund

00:29:24.120 --> 00:29:25.560
 balance policy.

00:29:25.560 --> 00:29:29.600
 And basically what we did is we looked at the city's current policy, compared to other

00:29:29.600 --> 00:29:33.280
 cities and other locally owned municipalities in the area.

00:29:33.280 --> 00:29:37.960
 Based on that survey, what we recommended through the budgeting process was to increase

00:29:37.960 --> 00:29:43.240
 the reserve targets for the electric utility and keep it the same for the other utilities.

00:29:43.240 --> 00:29:53.400
 So today's conversation is to formalize that, to adopt a policy that supports that recommendation.

00:29:53.400 --> 00:29:56.680
 And then what I'll do, these pro formas were presented to the public utility board during

00:29:56.680 --> 00:30:00.600
 the budgeting process, but what I wanted to do just with the new member on the public

00:30:00.600 --> 00:30:04.680
 utility board and the rest of the members as a recap, since it's been a couple of weeks,

00:30:04.680 --> 00:30:05.960
 is just walk you back through it.

00:30:05.960 --> 00:30:09.560
 We won't review it in detail like the budgeting process, the public utility board has already

00:30:09.560 --> 00:30:14.960
 approved this, but I definitely want to show you the fund balance targets.

00:30:14.960 --> 00:30:21.240
 So you can see we do budget in electric, we show a five-year forecast for the utility.

00:30:21.240 --> 00:30:25.720
 You can see the proposed fiscal year 2022 budget, and this budget will go forward to

00:30:25.720 --> 00:30:28.120
 city council for adoption next week.

00:30:28.120 --> 00:30:30.080
 And this budget starts October 1st.

00:30:30.080 --> 00:30:37.920
 So you can see planned revenues for the electric utility total 245.7 million, with total expenses

00:30:37.920 --> 00:30:42.840
 totaling 240.7, and you can see that number right here.

00:30:42.840 --> 00:30:48.880
 So ending net income of 4.9 million for the electric utility.

00:30:48.880 --> 00:30:52.120
 And what I want to do is draw your attention down here, you can see the engine reserve

00:30:52.120 --> 00:30:57.880
 for the electric utility is 123.3 million.

00:30:57.880 --> 00:31:03.120
 So currently, when Winter Storm URI had come forward this last year, we looked at these

00:31:03.120 --> 00:31:08.240
 reserve targets and it really kick-started that fund balance analysis that we'd started.

00:31:08.240 --> 00:31:12.160
 So as I said, based on those results of that study, we are looking to increase it.

00:31:12.160 --> 00:31:16.920
 So currently, the reserve target for the electric utility, you can see here at the bottom of

00:31:16.920 --> 00:31:22.240
 your slide, the minimum is 16%, with the maximum being 21%.

00:31:22.240 --> 00:31:28.800
 That equates to about 38.5 million for the minimum and 50.5 million for the maximum.

00:31:28.800 --> 00:31:32.100
 We did feel this was too low, and based on the feedback we got from PEB, we're looking

00:31:32.100 --> 00:31:34.160
 to increase that.

00:31:34.160 --> 00:31:40.560
 So the new minimum that we're proposing is 100 million, which equates to 46%, and the

00:31:40.560 --> 00:31:44.480
 maximum being 150 million, which equates to 69%.

00:31:44.480 --> 00:31:53.680
 And you can see the value of that is 110.7 and then 166.1.

00:31:53.680 --> 00:31:57.640
 Water utility, we're not looking to make any changes to the water fund balance policy,

00:31:57.640 --> 00:32:02.080
 it is sufficient based on the research that we did in that analysis, but did really quickly

00:32:02.080 --> 00:32:04.720
 want to show you the 2022 column.

00:32:04.720 --> 00:32:09.360
 We do show a 10-year forecast of the water utility, you can see it here in this column.

00:32:09.360 --> 00:32:17.400
 Revenues of 52.2, expenses of 51.2, so net income about 998,000, yes sir.

00:32:17.400 --> 00:32:23.360
 Quick question, it looked like on the electric utility, the revenue stream was declining

00:32:23.360 --> 00:32:31.000
 over the period of years going out to 25, 26, whereas on the water, it appears to be

00:32:31.000 --> 00:32:32.000
 going up.

00:32:32.000 --> 00:32:36.240
 I was just curious if you know what's driving those forecasts up and down.

00:32:36.240 --> 00:32:41.000
 That's a great question, Mr. Ryback, so during the budgeting process, you may have heard

00:32:41.000 --> 00:32:46.000
 the city is actually in the process of doing a full rate filing for our T-cost rate of

00:32:46.000 --> 00:32:50.120
 returns, our transmission assets, so the city gets a rate of return for investing in the

00:32:50.120 --> 00:32:51.520
 transmission system.

00:32:51.520 --> 00:32:55.200
 So we are taking the conservative approach, assuming that that T-cost rate of return will

00:32:55.200 --> 00:33:00.440
 go down, but we're yet to know how much it'll go down to, so that's the reason that revenue

00:33:00.440 --> 00:33:01.440
 is decreasing.

00:33:01.440 --> 00:33:13.700
 Okay, so fiscal year 2022 is 52.2, as Mr. Ryback had said, that revenue does increase

00:33:13.700 --> 00:33:18.720
 in fiscal year 2031, we are forecasting about 63.5 million, looking at those different growth

00:33:18.720 --> 00:33:21.460
 assumptions in the community.

00:33:21.460 --> 00:33:27.440
 Expenses in fiscal year 2022 is 51.2, net income about a million dollars.

00:33:27.440 --> 00:33:31.600
 Ending reserve fund balance for the water utility is right here in this blue, you can

00:33:31.600 --> 00:33:35.520
 see 20.5 million is ending reserve.

00:33:35.520 --> 00:33:42.840
 Current reserve target for the water utility is 120 days, with the maximum being 180 days.

00:33:42.840 --> 00:33:52.400
 You can see the value of that, so 16.5 million being the minimum, 24.8 being the maximum.

00:33:52.400 --> 00:33:56.120
 Wastewater utility, this does include drainage, so when we talk about drainage, it is part

00:33:56.120 --> 00:33:58.080
 of the wastewater fund.

00:33:58.080 --> 00:34:04.060
 Fiscal year 2022, you can see 38.6 million in revenues, 37.9 in expenses, net income

00:34:04.060 --> 00:34:09.360
 about 740,000, with that ending reserve target of 15.8.

00:34:09.360 --> 00:34:13.360
 Not looking to make any changes to wastewater, you can see the minimum being 100 days, that

00:34:13.360 --> 00:34:24.800
 equates about 11.5 million, and then the maximum being 140 days, which is about 16.2 or 16.1.

00:34:24.800 --> 00:34:29.360
 Water waste, we show a five-year forecast for this fund, so you can see the preliminary,

00:34:29.360 --> 00:34:34.960
 which is actually the proposed budget that the PUB did approve, revenues of 39.8 and

00:34:34.960 --> 00:34:38.320
 expenses of 37.2.

00:34:38.320 --> 00:34:43.360
 Ending reserve, you can see the reserve target here, which is 8.9 million.

00:34:43.360 --> 00:34:48.160
 We do show a separate reserve for the vehicle replacement fund, since they are heavily reliant

00:34:48.160 --> 00:34:53.160
 on vehicles, so we do show that separate, but you can see the current reserve targets

00:34:53.160 --> 00:34:59.600
 at the very bottom in the pink, the minimum being 51 days or 14%, the maximum being 65

00:34:59.600 --> 00:35:06.240
 days or 18%, so 6.9 million, or 6.7.

00:35:06.240 --> 00:35:09.360
 So we do have a public hearing on the budget tomorrow.

00:35:09.360 --> 00:35:14.480
 City Council is scheduled to adopt the budget, the tax rate, and the utility rates next Tuesday,

00:35:14.480 --> 00:35:17.680
 so we encourage you to listen to that meeting as we go forward to the City Council to get

00:35:17.680 --> 00:35:21.400
 them to adopt it or seek their approval.

00:35:21.400 --> 00:35:23.400
 And that is the presentation.

00:35:23.400 --> 00:35:26.160
 - Other questions?

00:35:26.160 --> 00:35:31.000
 Okay, seeing none, do we have a motion to approve item D?

00:35:31.000 --> 00:35:33.480
 - I move approval of item D.

00:35:33.480 --> 00:35:34.480
 - Thank you, Billy.

00:35:34.480 --> 00:35:35.480
 Second?

00:35:35.480 --> 00:35:36.480
 - Second.

00:35:36.480 --> 00:35:37.480
 - Thank you, Lee.

00:35:37.480 --> 00:35:38.480
 All in favor say aye.

00:35:38.480 --> 00:35:39.480
 - Aye.

00:35:39.480 --> 00:35:40.480
 - Opposed?

00:35:40.480 --> 00:35:41.480
 That carries.

00:35:41.480 --> 00:35:42.480
 Management reports.

00:35:42.480 --> 00:35:48.000
 - Madam Chair, Board, just a quick update here for the agenda items.

00:35:48.000 --> 00:35:55.240
 Obviously, we don't have this populated, but we did send to you a draft of the comprehensive

00:35:55.240 --> 00:35:57.000
 solid waste management strategy.

00:35:57.000 --> 00:35:59.880
 Brian Borner is on the line if you have any questions.

00:35:59.880 --> 00:36:05.760
 We do plan to come back to the Board in November to actually do the work session, so you've

00:36:05.760 --> 00:36:09.720
 received that document now quite a bit in advance, so you have an opportunity to review

00:36:09.720 --> 00:36:16.480
 it and be prepared, but again, Brian is on the line if you do have a question about that.

00:36:16.480 --> 00:36:24.000
 And then for the future or new business action items, obviously, that was one item that's

00:36:24.000 --> 00:36:29.280
 been included in the comprehensive solid waste management strategy is on recycling, residential

00:36:29.280 --> 00:36:38.000
 composting, and then DME is still working on this update on the 4CP impact of solar installations.

00:36:38.000 --> 00:36:43.720
 We do plan to have that to you here in the next couple of meetings, and then finally,

00:36:43.720 --> 00:36:47.120
 we are still working on a legislative update to provide to you.

00:36:47.120 --> 00:36:52.320
 As you know, there's now a third special session that's been called, but again, as soon as

00:36:52.320 --> 00:36:57.320
 we have that information, we'll forward it to you just in the status report.

00:36:57.320 --> 00:37:01.120
 So with that, I'm happy to answer any questions or if there's anything else you'd like to

00:37:01.120 --> 00:37:02.120
 discuss on that.

00:37:02.120 --> 00:37:03.120
 - Questions?

00:37:03.120 --> 00:37:04.120
 All right.

00:37:04.120 --> 00:37:08.400
 That brings us to concluding items.

00:37:08.400 --> 00:37:09.760
 Does any Board member wish...

00:37:09.760 --> 00:37:10.760
 Oh, yes.

00:37:10.760 --> 00:37:11.760
 I'm sorry.

00:37:11.760 --> 00:37:12.760
 Did you have a question?

00:37:12.760 --> 00:37:20.480
 - I was wondering if I could add a future agenda item for consideration by the Den Energy

00:37:20.480 --> 00:37:21.480
 Center.

00:37:21.480 --> 00:37:25.920
 I was wondering if we could have a look at their emergency preparedness planning in the

00:37:25.920 --> 00:37:31.200
 wake of our delightful winter storm, if they've made any changes that we would like to be

00:37:31.200 --> 00:37:32.200
 aware of.

00:37:32.200 --> 00:37:33.200
 - Okay.

00:37:33.200 --> 00:37:36.200
 Concluding items is a perfect place to do that.

00:37:36.200 --> 00:37:38.080
 - Absolutely.

00:37:38.080 --> 00:37:41.360
 - Anything else?

00:37:41.360 --> 00:37:44.040
 Any Board member wish to put any agenda?

00:37:44.040 --> 00:37:45.040
 Okay.

00:37:45.040 --> 00:37:47.480
 Maybe Larry, you can tell us a little bit about yourself.

00:37:47.480 --> 00:37:51.960
 I think some of us know you a little bit.

00:37:51.960 --> 00:37:56.480
 - Well, this is not my first time in this Chamber, as some of you all most should know.

00:37:56.480 --> 00:38:01.160
 Along with Devon Taylor, I served in the Planning and Zoning Commission, which opened my eyes

00:38:01.160 --> 00:38:02.160
 quite a bit.

00:38:02.160 --> 00:38:10.360
 So I've been in Denton since I came up here to go to school in '74, met my wife.

00:38:10.360 --> 00:38:16.000
 She was going to T.W. while I was going to North Texas State, and we've had two kids.

00:38:16.000 --> 00:38:22.200
 I lost my daughter last year as a result of COVID-related complications, but my son gave

00:38:22.200 --> 00:38:27.840
 me two grand babies, so I've got that to look forward to, and I'm looking forward to working

00:38:27.840 --> 00:38:30.840
 on this board.

00:38:30.840 --> 00:38:32.520
 - We look forward to having you here.

00:38:32.520 --> 00:38:33.520
 - Thank you.

00:38:33.520 --> 00:38:34.520
 - All right.

00:38:34.520 --> 00:38:37.400
 I guess it's 941.

00:38:37.400 --> 00:38:38.400
 Do we have a motion to adjourn?

00:38:38.400 --> 00:38:39.400
 - That's me.

00:38:39.400 --> 00:38:41.480
 - That's your job, Billy.

00:38:41.480 --> 00:38:42.160
 We are adjourned.

