1
00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:10,440
 Okay, welcome to our meeting. We appear to have a quorum of four members, so we can get

2
00:00:10,440 --> 00:00:15,160
 started. It's great to see everyone. It's been a long, long time since we've met, so

3
00:00:15,160 --> 00:00:22,960
 it's good to see everyone. And we can kick right into business. So do we have any presentations

4
00:00:22,960 --> 00:00:25,800
 or comments from the public for this meeting? Do we know?

5
00:00:25,800 --> 00:00:27,360
 No, Chair, not today.

6
00:00:27,360 --> 00:00:28,840
 Okay, thank you.

7
00:00:28,840 --> 00:00:29,840
 Sure.

8
00:00:29,840 --> 00:00:32,800
 All right. Well, then we'll start with our items for consideration. And our first item

9
00:00:32,800 --> 00:00:41,520
 is ATSC 21001. Receive nominations and elect a Chair and Vice Chair for the Traffic Safety

10
00:00:41,520 --> 00:00:43,200
 Commission.

11
00:00:43,200 --> 00:00:49,280
 Okay, so I can open it up. Just as a reminder, we did a better job last year, and I was reminded

12
00:00:49,280 --> 00:00:55,600
 that we are supposed to follow Robert's rules of order when we do the meeting. So if you

13
00:00:55,600 --> 00:00:59,840
 can either give me a virtual or just a hand, and I'll try to do my best to just call on

14
00:00:59,840 --> 00:01:03,840
 people to give us order. There's also, I think you can raise your hand in Zoom somewhere.

15
00:01:03,840 --> 00:01:07,840
 Let me see if I put up participants, I think. So I'll have that up too in case you want

16
00:01:07,840 --> 00:01:14,080
 to digitally raise your hand there. So yeah, so we have a discussion on the Chair and Vice

17
00:01:14,080 --> 00:01:22,080
 Chair. I was the Chair in the last term, and was Melissa the Vice Chair? Is that correct?

18
00:01:22,080 --> 00:01:29,280
 Okay. All right. Well, we can open the floor. We've got Clay, I think your hand's up. Do

19
00:01:29,280 --> 00:01:32,360
 you want to start off the comments?

20
00:01:32,360 --> 00:01:40,360
 I would say that if you and Melissa would be willing, I would move that we reelect and

21
00:01:40,360 --> 00:01:43,160
 continue with the same leadership.

22
00:01:43,160 --> 00:01:52,520
 Okay. So we have a recommendation. I think it's fair, Commissioner Carr, is that something

23
00:01:52,520 --> 00:01:56,760
 you're interested in, or would you want to trade places with me and you take over? I'm

24
00:01:56,760 --> 00:02:03,120
 very happy to share the mantle if you like to read out things in order.

25
00:02:03,120 --> 00:02:08,920
 I am willing to do exactly what we've been doing. I'm great with the Vice Chair. I must

26
00:02:08,920 --> 00:02:15,000
 say that remembering Robert's Rules of Orders is somewhat challenging for me sometimes,

27
00:02:15,000 --> 00:02:17,920
 so I'm really okay with the way it is.

28
00:02:17,920 --> 00:02:23,280
 It's challenging for me too, if you've been in these meetings, so I'm trying to do better.

29
00:02:23,280 --> 00:02:35,040
 Okay. Do we have any other comments from any other commissioners? Okay. So Clay, was that

30
00:02:35,040 --> 00:02:37,520
 a recommendation that you were putting forward?

31
00:02:37,520 --> 00:02:43,080
 Yeah. If there's no further discussion or nobody wants to nominate or anything, I would

32
00:02:43,080 --> 00:02:44,600
 make that a motion.

33
00:02:44,600 --> 00:02:54,360
 Okay. All right. So Clay Thurman is making the recommendation that I stay as the Chair

34
00:02:54,360 --> 00:03:03,360
 and that Melissa Carr stays as the Vice Chair. Is there all in favor of that motion? Can

35
00:03:03,360 --> 00:03:04,360
 we get an aye?

36
00:03:04,360 --> 00:03:08,760
 Okay. Hang on, Chair. If we're taking that as a motion, we'll need a second.

37
00:03:08,760 --> 00:03:09,760
 Second.

38
00:03:09,760 --> 00:03:15,840
 Okay. We've got a second from Jeff King. Thank you. I told you I was rusty. Okay. So now

39
00:03:15,840 --> 00:03:20,840
 if we can go ahead and we could go to vote. So we have a motion for the Chairs to remain

40
00:03:20,840 --> 00:03:25,960
 the same, me as Chair and Melissa as Vice Chair. All in favor? Can we get an aye?

41
00:03:25,960 --> 00:03:30,200
 Sorry, Chair. Because we're doing it virtually, you'll need to do a roll call vote.

42
00:03:30,200 --> 00:03:31,200
 Okay.

43
00:03:31,200 --> 00:03:35,120
 As I mean, whatever order they appear on your screen is fine, but just go through everybody.

44
00:03:35,120 --> 00:03:40,280
 Yep. Okay. So we're just aye. No problem. Aye or nay? Commissioner Carr?

45
00:03:40,280 --> 00:03:41,280
 Aye.

46
00:03:41,280 --> 00:03:42,720
 Commissioner Thurman?

47
00:03:42,720 --> 00:03:43,720
 Aye.

48
00:03:43,720 --> 00:03:44,720
 Commissioner King?

49
00:03:44,720 --> 00:03:45,720
 Aye.

50
00:03:45,720 --> 00:03:51,480
 And I am also an aye. So that is four ayes and the motion carries. And so the board will

51
00:03:51,480 --> 00:03:56,140
 recommend us to keep our existing situation with me as Chair and Melissa Carr as Vice

52
00:03:56,140 --> 00:04:05,920
 Chair. Okay. That was quick. Item B, TSC 21002, receive a report, hold a discussion and approve

53
00:04:05,920 --> 00:04:11,640
 the Traffic Safety Commission annual 2021 meeting schedule. And as I, before I moved

54
00:04:11,640 --> 00:04:15,760
 to this one, actually, I just realized, I don't know if we, I think I forgot to approve

55
00:04:15,760 --> 00:04:23,120
 the prior minutes. Are there any changes needed to the prior minutes from any of the commissioners?

56
00:04:23,120 --> 00:04:28,160
 I don't see any reason to change them. Okay. No corrections needed.

57
00:04:28,160 --> 00:04:36,320
 Chair, I'm sorry. I think we skipped one. Oh, did we? Oh, it is the third. Okay. Sorry.

58
00:04:36,320 --> 00:04:40,400
 I forgot that I didn't see it on the schedule there. And so I was thinking, I was thinking

59
00:04:40,400 --> 00:04:46,800
 we had to do that separately. Okay. Nevermind. We'll stick with BTSC 21002. Receive a report,

60
00:04:46,800 --> 00:04:53,360
 hold a discussion and approve the Traffic Safety Commission annual 2021 meeting schedule.

61
00:04:53,360 --> 00:05:01,440
 Okay. So it looks like to me, when I look at it, we're moving to Wednesdays. Is that

62
00:05:01,440 --> 00:05:08,720
 correct? I'm Paul. So is there, is there anyone going, are we just looking at the attachments

63
00:05:08,720 --> 00:05:14,440
 here or is anyone from the city discussing anything on this issue?

64
00:05:14,440 --> 00:05:20,040
 We're happy to discuss the calendar, what we would like to do if possible is go ahead

65
00:05:20,040 --> 00:05:24,840
 and do what the best that we can to set that calendar forward. You know, I think Wednesdays

66
00:05:24,840 --> 00:05:32,240
 has been the day that has been happening in the past few months. There are some opportunities

67
00:05:32,240 --> 00:05:40,440
 for us to move to the third Monday of the month if the commission is interested in that.

68
00:05:40,440 --> 00:05:45,240
 Becky has taken the opportunity to look at the calendar. And I know it gets a little

69
00:05:45,240 --> 00:05:49,120
 confusing today with two Becky. So when you said earlier, I'm like, which Becky are you

70
00:05:49,120 --> 00:05:54,000
 talking to? But want to go ahead and, you know, talk about kind of that, that schedule

71
00:05:54,000 --> 00:05:58,040
 and what might work for the commission. So I don't know, Becky, do you have anything

72
00:05:58,040 --> 00:06:02,600
 additional you'd like to add to that? We basically have the opportunity to stay at the current

73
00:06:02,600 --> 00:06:09,160
 timeframe that we're working through or possibly if you're interested moving to the third Monday

74
00:06:09,160 --> 00:06:14,700
 of the month, during that that lunch hour timeframe. Unfortunately, the first Monday

75
00:06:14,700 --> 00:06:22,520
 of the month is already taken by a different, different group at this time. So it's just

76
00:06:22,520 --> 00:06:26,120
 really kind of open for discussion, something we would like to set. So I'll turn it over

77
00:06:26,120 --> 00:06:33,120
 to Becky so she can add to the conversation. I just wanted to say that we originally had

78
00:06:33,120 --> 00:06:39,680
 targeted this, this 1130-1230 timeframe, because many of you have full-time employment and

79
00:06:39,680 --> 00:06:46,240
 it was suggested that you might be able to couple it with your lunch break to allow you

80
00:06:46,240 --> 00:06:51,160
 to continue to participate with the committee, moving it from the evening meeting to a daytime

81
00:06:51,160 --> 00:06:59,640
 working time slot. We do have one commissioner, Kevin Sample, who is not able to meet during

82
00:06:59,640 --> 00:07:06,720
 the day and we'll be addressing that concern as we go forward. We have two vacant seats

83
00:07:06,720 --> 00:07:14,240
 on this board, one that was vacated by Jim Owen. He moved to the library board just prior

84
00:07:14,240 --> 00:07:22,440
 to his commission expiring and also the vacancy that was created by Connie Baker being elected

85
00:07:22,440 --> 00:07:27,800
 to city council. So your thoughts if you want to see the meeting moved to a different time

86
00:07:27,800 --> 00:07:34,500
 slot? It would, we could explore other options. I was just originally asked to see about moving

87
00:07:34,500 --> 00:07:39,560
 it back to the standing Monday date and we did have some conflicts on the first Monday

88
00:07:39,560 --> 00:07:45,960
 of the month as we have so many committees that are vying for workday time slots on the

89
00:07:45,960 --> 00:07:53,320
 calendar now. Is Commissioner Sample still, is he is still a member of the committee or

90
00:07:53,320 --> 00:07:59,160
 - Yes, currently. - Okay. So I'll just say that I just would

91
00:07:59,160 --> 00:08:04,000
 love to know what he is able to do. I mean, of course our previous meetings were typically

92
00:08:04,000 --> 00:08:11,160
 at 5.30. Is that, is that, are the meetings that like right after work, is that not an

93
00:08:11,160 --> 00:08:14,960
 option anymore? Is that something Commissioner Sample would better suit him? What do we know

94
00:08:14,960 --> 00:08:18,920
 about that? - All meetings at this time are required to

95
00:08:18,920 --> 00:08:25,560
 be held during the normal eight to five workday schedule. That's for DTV to accommodate the

96
00:08:25,560 --> 00:08:34,800
 recordings for the public meeting records. So Kevin did in conversation state that he

97
00:08:34,800 --> 00:08:41,840
 could possibly meet on Mondays, but did not make a commitment to that day. His work schedule

98
00:08:41,840 --> 00:08:49,600
 at this time, he's currently scheduled off on Mondays and might be able to participate.

99
00:08:49,600 --> 00:08:53,680
 - I mean, if the other commissioners I'd love to hear what you all, I have a lot of flexibility

100
00:08:53,680 --> 00:09:00,800
 at least until September when I get a new teaching schedule at UNT. And so right now

101
00:09:00,800 --> 00:09:05,520
 my schedule is flexible and I can move things. So I'm fine. I would be fine with deferring

102
00:09:05,520 --> 00:09:09,600
 to if Commissioner Sample thinks that there's a time he can make on Mondays, I would be

103
00:09:09,600 --> 00:09:15,240
 okay with that. What do other commissioners, Commissioner Carr?

104
00:09:15,240 --> 00:09:20,200
 - I'm fine with that also. Wednesdays at 1130 is fine for me. And if we need to move it

105
00:09:20,200 --> 00:09:28,560
 to the third Monday, I'm also fine with that. - Other comments, Commissioner Thurmond or

106
00:09:28,560 --> 00:09:33,600
 King, Commissioner Thurmond? - Yeah, I agree with Melissa that I think

107
00:09:33,600 --> 00:09:40,920
 we should try to accommodate Kevin's schedule as much as possible.

108
00:09:40,920 --> 00:09:47,160
 - Mondays work for me as well. - Okay. So what I'm hearing is, can we make

109
00:09:47,160 --> 00:09:54,560
 a motion then to, can we make a motion to have Becky, somebody, one of the Beckys who's

110
00:09:54,560 --> 00:10:01,520
 able to, I don't know who contacts, but to contact Commissioner Sample and see if that

111
00:10:01,520 --> 00:10:06,520
 would be a better time that would work for him. And then can we find out digitally, get

112
00:10:06,520 --> 00:10:08,920
 confirmation that way? Is that something we could do?

113
00:10:08,920 --> 00:10:12,240
 - Yes. - Okay. All right. Does someone want to make

114
00:10:12,240 --> 00:10:15,760
 a motion on that? - Chair, I don't think you need a motion

115
00:10:15,760 --> 00:10:19,000
 on that. That can just be direction by the board at this point. And then once that information

116
00:10:19,000 --> 00:10:23,960
 comes back, then the board can approve what the new schedule would be officially.

117
00:10:23,960 --> 00:10:31,600
 - Okay. - Excuse me. On that note, I got on just a minute late or something. I don't know

118
00:10:31,600 --> 00:10:36,840
 what y'all were talking about, but did we talk about where we're at and the filling

119
00:10:36,840 --> 00:10:42,440
 of the other two positions? - We did not get an update on that. I don't

120
00:10:42,440 --> 00:10:45,920
 know if there's any updates that can be provided. I mean, those have to be appointed through

121
00:10:45,920 --> 00:10:54,040
 counselors, right? - That is up to the new council that has

122
00:10:54,040 --> 00:11:01,400
 been elected and they will be making recommendations or nominations. Once they're presented and

123
00:11:01,400 --> 00:11:07,720
 voted on by council, then the individuals would need to go through the same process

124
00:11:07,720 --> 00:11:14,480
 of completing their paperwork and taking their oath before they could participate in a meeting.

125
00:11:14,480 --> 00:11:20,960
 - All right. Well, do we... So we don't need a motion, but we will wait for word to find

126
00:11:20,960 --> 00:11:27,680
 out if that is more amenable to Commissioner Sample's schedule and hopefully we can figure

127
00:11:27,680 --> 00:11:32,920
 out a time that works for him. - Perfect. Thank you very much, Chair. We'll

128
00:11:32,920 --> 00:11:37,680
 look forward to getting back with you on Mr. Sample's available.

129
00:11:37,680 --> 00:11:43,040
 - Okay. Great. Thank you. All right. So we can move on to C, which I didn't think was

130
00:11:43,040 --> 00:11:49,280
 on the minutes for whatever reason, but it is. It's TSC 21003, consider the approval

131
00:11:49,280 --> 00:11:57,040
 of the minutes of November 9th, 2020. So the question really is, are there any corrections

132
00:11:57,040 --> 00:12:07,640
 or changes that need to be made to the minutes? Okay. If there are no corrections, does someone

133
00:12:07,640 --> 00:12:13,080
 want to make a motion to approve the minutes from our previous meeting? Commissioner Carr?

134
00:12:13,080 --> 00:12:15,640
 - I motion to approve the minutes from the previous meeting.

135
00:12:15,640 --> 00:12:19,600
 - Can we get a second? - Second.

136
00:12:19,600 --> 00:12:25,600
 - Okay. Commissioner King seconds, and we will go through roll call vote. Commissioner

137
00:12:25,600 --> 00:12:29,520
 Carr, do you vote yay or nay? - I vote yay.

138
00:12:29,520 --> 00:12:31,960
 - Commissioner Thurmond? - Yay.

139
00:12:31,960 --> 00:12:33,960
 - King? - Yay.

140
00:12:33,960 --> 00:12:40,400
 - And I vote yay. So that's 4-0 and the motion approves and the minutes are approved. Okay.

141
00:12:40,400 --> 00:12:47,600
 Moving on to item D, TSC 21004, staff reports. We have staff update memo regarding the senior

142
00:12:47,600 --> 00:12:54,160
 planner bicycle, pedestrian, and ADA coordinator position update, and we have traffic engineering

143
00:12:54,160 --> 00:13:01,240
 project evaluations and DCTA trip application on the agenda.

144
00:13:01,240 --> 00:13:07,160
 - Thank you very much. Good morning, everyone. My name is Becky Devaney, city engineer and

145
00:13:07,160 --> 00:13:12,400
 director of capital projects. I also have Chandra on the phone with me today. He is

146
00:13:12,400 --> 00:13:17,360
 our senior traffic engineer. And so I wanted to talk through a couple of different items

147
00:13:17,360 --> 00:13:21,720
 and kind of bring you up to speed. I know some of these are very much of interest to

148
00:13:21,720 --> 00:13:26,240
 the commission. And so the first thing I wanted to talk about is the senior planner bicycle,

149
00:13:26,240 --> 00:13:33,120
 pedestrian and ADA coordinator position. I've had the opportunity to review the applications.

150
00:13:33,120 --> 00:13:44,200
 At the time of the publishing of this document, which basically was last week, we had 34 applicants.

151
00:13:44,200 --> 00:13:51,440
 We now have 44 applicants. I've had the opportunity to review all of those individual applications,

152
00:13:51,440 --> 00:13:56,280
 talk several individuals to see if they are still interested in the position and kind

153
00:13:56,280 --> 00:14:01,080
 of talk through some of their experiences. At this point, we have five to seven different

154
00:14:01,080 --> 00:14:06,120
 individuals that we're talking to and working to set up interviews over the next couple

155
00:14:06,120 --> 00:14:10,480
 of weeks. Our hopes are to be able to interview four to five different individuals. There

156
00:14:10,480 --> 00:14:15,600
 are three that have expressed interest in continuing through the process of an interview.

157
00:14:15,600 --> 00:14:20,960
 A few of the folks have already received other positions with other cities. So very excited

158
00:14:20,960 --> 00:14:24,720
 to be able to bring that forward. Hopefully, by the next time we talk, I'll be able to

159
00:14:24,720 --> 00:14:31,040
 explain to you that we've held the interviews and really what the next steps are. So definitely

160
00:14:31,040 --> 00:14:35,700
 moving in the right direction and having the opportunity to get those interviews set up.

161
00:14:35,700 --> 00:14:42,080
 So we do appreciate being able to provide you the feedback on that. The next topic I

162
00:14:42,080 --> 00:14:49,160
 wanted to talk about is the traffic engineering and kind of project evaluation. Late January,

163
00:14:49,160 --> 00:14:55,600
 city staff, myself, along with several other folks, met with Brian Dale at NETCOG to discuss

164
00:14:55,600 --> 00:15:00,960
 kind of the status of the overall NETCOG funding and upcoming funding opportunities for transportation

165
00:15:00,960 --> 00:15:06,960
 and sidewalks. We currently were working through completing an overall assessment of all the

166
00:15:06,960 --> 00:15:11,600
 traffic engineering projects. Chandra, myself, and several other individuals have sat down

167
00:15:11,600 --> 00:15:16,440
 and looked at all of the traffic engineering projects that currently are either in process

168
00:15:16,440 --> 00:15:21,920
 for execution or in a study phase, design phase. Some of them are traffic studies in

169
00:15:21,920 --> 00:15:27,640
 particular that may need to turn into projects and working through roles and assignments

170
00:15:27,640 --> 00:15:31,900
 and getting many of those projects assigned to a project manager. So Chandra has been

171
00:15:31,900 --> 00:15:39,400
 very busy working through many of those different project assignments as we move forward. Just

172
00:15:39,400 --> 00:15:43,760
 wanted to kind of mention to you that we're looking really at the traffic engineering

173
00:15:43,760 --> 00:15:50,040
 group as a whole and working to assign projects that are ready to go through either the design

174
00:15:50,040 --> 00:15:55,920
 phase or the construction phase to a project manager that would report to our Deputy Director

175
00:15:55,920 --> 00:16:01,360
 of Capital Projects, Rachel Wood. At this time, Chandra is really working on facilitating

176
00:16:01,360 --> 00:16:06,880
 many of the development review projects that come through. Also looking at any type of

177
00:16:06,880 --> 00:16:11,800
 traffic consideration or question that comes in from an engineering perspective, working

178
00:16:11,800 --> 00:16:16,720
 through studies and really ultimately working on also the mobility plan update. There's

179
00:16:16,720 --> 00:16:20,720
 many things that are, you know, kind of going on behind the scenes that are really specifically

180
00:16:20,720 --> 00:16:25,160
 kind of day-to-day operations of our traffic engineering department. And so our focus is

181
00:16:25,160 --> 00:16:29,600
 just to take the projects that are ready to be delivered and move those into our project

182
00:16:29,600 --> 00:16:34,400
 delivery team. So we're very excited about that. And we're looking kind of at our overall

183
00:16:34,400 --> 00:16:39,200
 workload and really setting things up. I don't know that you've had the opportunity or maybe

184
00:16:39,200 --> 00:16:43,920
 we have, have or have not, to listen to some of the presentations that we've made recently

185
00:16:43,920 --> 00:16:48,840
 to counsel on the overall CIP update. The one thing I would tell you is we're working

186
00:16:48,840 --> 00:16:53,960
 on structuring projects from initiation all the way through design, construction through

187
00:16:53,960 --> 00:16:59,360
 completion phase and also kind of having that point of contact be a project manager so that

188
00:16:59,360 --> 00:17:05,080
 that individual is responsible for that project throughout all the phases, involving also

189
00:17:05,080 --> 00:17:10,040
 the engineering division when need be and having them review. So really just kind of

190
00:17:10,040 --> 00:17:15,800
 an overall update. I expect that there are several projects that we're going to have

191
00:17:15,800 --> 00:17:20,960
 that are ready to be closed out. And there are quite a few that are currently under construction

192
00:17:20,960 --> 00:17:25,800
 too. The other thing we're looking at are all the different tasks that need to be completed

193
00:17:25,800 --> 00:17:30,400
 from our task tracker and different speed studies that are working through the completion

194
00:17:30,400 --> 00:17:34,920
 phase. So really just doing kind of an overall evaluation of everything that's going on

195
00:17:34,920 --> 00:17:39,760
 traffic engineering and Chandra's been instrumental along with Scott Wilson in reviewing a lot

196
00:17:39,760 --> 00:17:45,560
 of those things. So very excited about moving some of those projects forward. The next topic

197
00:17:45,560 --> 00:17:51,360
 I wanted to discuss with you is the DCTA trip funding application. I'm not going to go into

198
00:17:51,360 --> 00:17:55,520
 a whole lot of great detail besides to tell you that the city's very excited to announce

199
00:17:55,520 --> 00:18:02,080
 to you that we have submitted an application for the DCTA trip funding. And as you can

200
00:18:02,080 --> 00:18:08,280
 see from the description and in the staff report, basically there's several different

201
00:18:08,280 --> 00:18:12,280
 cities, city of Denton, city of Highland Village and city of Lewisville that currently make

202
00:18:12,280 --> 00:18:21,320
 up the member cities of the DCTA group. And we were given the opportunity to submit projects

203
00:18:21,320 --> 00:18:26,880
 based on the following criteria, which were project limits to be located primarily within

204
00:18:26,880 --> 00:18:33,600
 the DCTA service area, within a geographic boundary of the DCTA either member city or

205
00:18:33,600 --> 00:18:40,120
 within a quarter mile of an A train or DCTA fixed bus route. Then you can also have the

206
00:18:40,120 --> 00:18:49,200
 opportunity to demonstrate, I'll get it out one way or another, I'm sorry that word was

207
00:18:49,200 --> 00:18:54,720
 giving me a hard time, but to demonstrate the project is financially sound. So we really

208
00:18:54,720 --> 00:19:01,720
 looked at the capital expansion projects that will facilitate reliable design build cost

209
00:19:01,720 --> 00:19:08,580
 estimates, cost estimates for maintenance or assets, requested capital funding really

210
00:19:08,580 --> 00:19:14,940
 not to exceed the member cities trip allocation. And then also given the opportunity to look

211
00:19:14,940 --> 00:19:19,080
 at identified funding sources for projects exceeding the requested amount. So that was

212
00:19:19,080 --> 00:19:24,500
 really how to demonstrate the project is financially sound. And what you'll see in your packet

213
00:19:24,500 --> 00:19:29,860
 is the city staff initiated some planning efforts and really prioritize the eligible

214
00:19:29,860 --> 00:19:34,960
 trip projects. And so I'm looking at the list of those projects on my screen. And I just

215
00:19:34,960 --> 00:19:39,600
 wanted to kind of go through and mention to you each one of those individual projects.

216
00:19:39,600 --> 00:19:46,480
 The first project is the A train to UNT bike and pedestrian path. That estimate at completion

217
00:19:46,480 --> 00:19:53,160
 is about 2.5 million. There's currently some city funding and some external funding. So

218
00:19:53,160 --> 00:20:00,000
 we submitted for the trip funding of approximately 1.6 million. The next project is the Jennings

219
00:20:00,000 --> 00:20:05,640
 and Alexander elementary safe routes to school project. That estimate at completion is about

220
00:20:05,640 --> 00:20:10,960
 1.5 million. You can see some current city funding and external funding and that proposed

221
00:20:10,960 --> 00:20:17,880
 trip funding application was right 100 right around 505,000. The next project is the Wilson

222
00:20:17,880 --> 00:20:25,680
 and for concrete elementary sidewalks. That estimate at completion is 629,000. And you

223
00:20:25,680 --> 00:20:29,760
 can see the city funding external funding and the proposed funding for trip was really

224
00:20:29,760 --> 00:20:36,560
 just about $80,000 on that project. Also the all way crossing design and that estimate

225
00:20:36,560 --> 00:20:45,320
 at completion is 153,000. And we are asking for about $68,000. You can see the Bell sidewalk

226
00:20:45,320 --> 00:20:54,560
 construction, which is 147,000. And we were requesting approximately $89,000. I mean,

227
00:20:54,560 --> 00:21:00,960
 the Med Park sidewalk construction, the estimate of that project was about 147. And we were

228
00:21:00,960 --> 00:21:05,360
 requesting actually that total dollar amount. So the total request for the proposed trip

229
00:21:05,360 --> 00:21:16,880
 funding was 2,517,977. So on February 2nd is when DCTA announced this official call

230
00:21:16,880 --> 00:21:23,280
 for projects and staff, our staff, the capital projects and engineering staff coordinated

231
00:21:23,280 --> 00:21:29,240
 with our grants administrator, Laura Barons and her team to complete the application.

232
00:21:29,240 --> 00:21:34,600
 And on March 16th, which will be coming up very soon, city staff will ask council to

233
00:21:34,600 --> 00:21:41,240
 consider the to consider the design contracts for four of these, which are the Bell Park.

234
00:21:41,240 --> 00:21:47,680
 I mean, I'm sorry, the Bell sidewalk Jennings and Alexander and Wilson and Pecan Creek and

235
00:21:47,680 --> 00:21:54,760
 the all way and a train. So we're working through kind of actually moving forward with

236
00:21:54,760 --> 00:21:59,080
 those projects. I mean, anticipation of the funding. So I think that's a really good news

237
00:21:59,080 --> 00:22:03,600
 story. We wanted to have the opportunity to share. We shared a similar story last night

238
00:22:03,600 --> 00:22:12,120
 at our council update. And the DCTA overall application came to council a few weeks back.

239
00:22:12,120 --> 00:22:15,680
 So just wanted to give you an opportunity to kind of tell you some of the things that

240
00:22:15,680 --> 00:22:22,160
 are going on within the department and just give you an update. So any questions with

241
00:22:22,160 --> 00:22:26,560
 that before we move kind of to the next item to talk about?

242
00:22:26,560 --> 00:22:33,520
 Well, I do have an overall question first. So are these projects are these projects where

243
00:22:33,520 --> 00:22:38,680
 design is already approved? Like, is there any purview or will these any of these projects

244
00:22:38,680 --> 00:22:45,920
 be of interest or come before our committee? All of these. Well, several of these projects.

245
00:22:45,920 --> 00:22:52,140
 Actually, we're taking those design contracts forward at the council meeting on next to

246
00:22:52,140 --> 00:22:57,720
 or I'm sorry to Tuesday was that we have a week off for spring break. So the 16th several

247
00:22:57,720 --> 00:23:03,280
 of those projects will come forward for design contracts and move forward. We definitely

248
00:23:03,280 --> 00:23:07,600
 can bring those projects back at some level to be able to show you if that's something

249
00:23:07,600 --> 00:23:11,840
 the committee is interested in. It's kind of seeing an overall once we get to a certain

250
00:23:11,840 --> 00:23:16,400
 design phase, I'm just being able to give you an update as to how those designs are

251
00:23:16,400 --> 00:23:21,120
 happening and really, you know, how we're moving forward. So I think it's something

252
00:23:21,120 --> 00:23:25,640
 that we could continue to give you a report on if that's something you're interested in,

253
00:23:25,640 --> 00:23:30,160
 especially the ones in particular that we're moving forward with the design contracts.

254
00:23:30,160 --> 00:23:33,960
 So if that's something that you're interested in, I think we definitely would be willing

255
00:23:33,960 --> 00:23:40,320
 to bring those those topics back as a staff report. That's no problem. Well, and I think

256
00:23:40,320 --> 00:23:44,200
 there's been if the other commissioners can chime in, but I think there's several projects

257
00:23:44,200 --> 00:23:48,880
 that were mentioned that are certainly have been discussed extensively. For example, any

258
00:23:48,880 --> 00:23:53,480
 sidewalks being added on Bell as a topic we've we've talked about repeatedly over the year.

259
00:23:53,480 --> 00:23:58,760
 So for example, I think and others can kind of add on about other projects. I'd love to

260
00:23:58,760 --> 00:24:04,080
 see what that's going to look like. And if we were able to have any input to to provide

261
00:24:04,080 --> 00:24:08,480
 suggestions about what sidewalks along Bell would look like, for example. And there's

262
00:24:08,480 --> 00:24:11,600
 several other projects I could comment on, but I don't think we're going to get into

263
00:24:11,600 --> 00:24:15,880
 the nitty gritty today, I'm guessing. Sure. No, we actually need to take those design

264
00:24:15,880 --> 00:24:21,280
 contracts to council, which I mentioned are on March 16th. And once we take those to council,

265
00:24:21,280 --> 00:24:26,080
 they'll go through that design process. And at some period of time, and whether it's schematic

266
00:24:26,080 --> 00:24:31,140
 phase or whether it's, you know, into a further design phase, we'll work to just bring this

267
00:24:31,140 --> 00:24:37,320
 as part of a staff report so we can allow you an opportunity to see an overview. And

268
00:24:37,320 --> 00:24:42,040
 when we get further down the road with these projects, I even anticipate having either

269
00:24:42,040 --> 00:24:46,880
 the the deputy director of capital projects or the project manager and bring forward kind

270
00:24:46,880 --> 00:24:51,760
 of a presentation that can show you those designs. And so, you know, I don't think that's

271
00:24:51,760 --> 00:24:55,520
 anything any issue at all. And if you'd like to see that, I think that's definitely something

272
00:24:55,520 --> 00:24:59,920
 that's doable is to kind of keep you apprised. Obviously, we'll keep you apprised to have

273
00:24:59,920 --> 00:25:04,140
 the funding application since it's been submitted, but definitely something we can continue to

274
00:25:04,140 --> 00:25:09,040
 report on. Okay, great. Is there any other commissioners have any questions for Becky

275
00:25:09,040 --> 00:25:16,480
 before she moves on. One question I have one question I have is this trip thing an annual

276
00:25:16,480 --> 00:25:23,960
 program. Yes, sir. What we understand is that it is going to be an annual program. And this

277
00:25:23,960 --> 00:25:29,240
 is just their first round of call for projects. So what we're doing right now is developing

278
00:25:29,240 --> 00:25:35,280
 kind of a sidewalk work plan that talks about all of the projects that need to be completed

279
00:25:35,280 --> 00:25:41,800
 in the city, along with, you know, the adoption of the mobility plan in the near future, and

280
00:25:41,800 --> 00:25:47,640
 then also, you know, the bike ped plan and the sidewalk plan, we will see some similarities

281
00:25:47,640 --> 00:25:52,640
 and some opportunities to use those plans, particularly that are areas where we know

282
00:25:52,640 --> 00:25:58,560
 those improvements need to be made as opportunities. As long as they meet the criteria set forth

283
00:25:58,560 --> 00:26:04,240
 by DCTA, correct. So they have to be within that, you know, quarter mile radius. And so

284
00:26:04,240 --> 00:26:08,920
 if we're looking for particular projects, we already have a few actually on the list

285
00:26:08,920 --> 00:26:12,920
 for the next time the funding comes through, because we understood we were going to be

286
00:26:12,920 --> 00:26:20,720
 allocated a certain amount, which was right around that 2.5 2.6 million. And the anticipation

287
00:26:20,720 --> 00:26:26,480
 and what we've heard to date is that this is a five year program. Okay, is TW on that

288
00:26:26,480 --> 00:26:35,440
 list? Actually, TW is a project that we're working on more of a holistic approach. And

289
00:26:35,440 --> 00:26:42,600
 that's something we'll be bringing forward to council on March 23. TW has several different

290
00:26:42,600 --> 00:26:47,200
 things going on. Just to kind of give you an idea of what we're looking at right now

291
00:26:47,200 --> 00:26:53,160
 is we are trying to evaluate things from a more holistic approach when we go into a particular

292
00:26:53,160 --> 00:26:59,320
 area. This is just kind of a little bit of a brief introduction to what you may see in

293
00:26:59,320 --> 00:27:03,880
 the future is, you know, not only are there sidewalks or roadways that need to be completed

294
00:27:03,880 --> 00:27:07,760
 in many areas, there may be street lights, there may be water or wastewater improvements

295
00:27:07,760 --> 00:27:11,820
 that need to be made. And so we're trying to look at that from a holistic approach.

296
00:27:11,820 --> 00:27:16,920
 And TW is actually one of the neighborhoods that we've already been looking at. So we

297
00:27:16,920 --> 00:27:22,680
 have some phase one contracts that will be coming forward to council on March 23, that

298
00:27:22,680 --> 00:27:25,880
 we'll be bringing forward to talk about that area and some of the improvements in that

299
00:27:25,880 --> 00:27:32,120
 area. But overall, the TW sidewalks is definitely something that we're looking into. There's

300
00:27:32,120 --> 00:27:36,720
 been conversations about sidewalks along Mingo, sidewalks along Roodale, and some of that

301
00:27:36,720 --> 00:27:43,480
 is also going to need to have real estate acquired, etc. So they're definitely on our

302
00:27:43,480 --> 00:27:48,640
 list and I think some of those that you may be thinking about will be in coordination

303
00:27:48,640 --> 00:27:53,480
 with some of the TW projects. I will tell you the TW projects are going to be phased

304
00:27:53,480 --> 00:28:00,520
 due to the amount of funding and the overall bond program projects that are associated

305
00:28:00,520 --> 00:28:04,520
 with this at that time, but definitely something that we're evaluating. So I'm not sure if

306
00:28:04,520 --> 00:28:09,080
 that touches on what you're looking for if you have a particular area of TW, but definitely

307
00:28:09,080 --> 00:28:15,280
 something I mean, as you can see the Bell Avenue runs, you know, directly near the TW

308
00:28:15,280 --> 00:28:26,880
 area. Yeah, yeah, I was thinking particularly from A train to TW. Okay, sure. Which I agree,

309
00:28:26,880 --> 00:28:31,120
 Commissioner Thurman, that is a super important connection point that should be really clear

310
00:28:31,120 --> 00:28:37,040
 for students that are using DCTA. Absolutely. So we can definitely look into that. I can't

311
00:28:37,040 --> 00:28:42,200
 speak directly to that area, but I know there's some Bell Avenue sidewalks that we're currently

312
00:28:42,200 --> 00:28:46,200
 looking at under construction and kind of filling in those gaps, right? So that's really

313
00:28:46,200 --> 00:28:52,360
 the goal. And so I think that makes perfect sense. It's very, a very close opportunity

314
00:28:52,360 --> 00:28:59,760
 to get from the DCTA A train stop to T to TW. So that makes complete sense. I appreciate

315
00:28:59,760 --> 00:29:07,520
 the feedback. Thank you. No problem. So that's really my staff report. And the other thing

316
00:29:07,520 --> 00:29:13,080
 I wanted to kind of talk about with all of you is the opportunity to bring forward any

317
00:29:13,080 --> 00:29:20,240
 future items for consideration. I think we've heard today that you would like to be able

318
00:29:20,240 --> 00:29:24,880
 to receive feedback and kind of an update on this DCTA program as we move through the

319
00:29:24,880 --> 00:29:30,720
 process. I heard mention of, you know, some of the TW projects and how that is coordinated

320
00:29:30,720 --> 00:29:36,880
 in that area. Also wanted to mention we did receive some questions earlier this week about

321
00:29:36,880 --> 00:29:41,600
 the golf cart ordinance. And I know that's one of the things that's been brought to this

322
00:29:41,600 --> 00:29:48,160
 commission also. So there are several folks that are new in their roles, myself included.

323
00:29:48,160 --> 00:29:53,600
 Chandra is fulfilling some roles that he hasn't traditionally filled. And so just wanted to

324
00:29:53,600 --> 00:29:59,240
 take that opportunity to ask you all if there might be particular topics you're interested

325
00:29:59,240 --> 00:30:03,940
 in seeing us bring back to you and really kind of get a fresh start. We do have the

326
00:30:03,940 --> 00:30:08,560
 old list. But we know that there are some things that maybe have already been addressed

327
00:30:08,560 --> 00:30:14,120
 or things that maybe are not completely clear as to, you know, what needs to happen from

328
00:30:14,120 --> 00:30:18,520
 that perspective. So just wanted to take this opportunity to allow each one of you to kind

329
00:30:18,520 --> 00:30:23,200
 of walk through or whoever is interested to tell us some topics that they might like to

330
00:30:23,200 --> 00:30:28,540
 see so that we could start working on. Really what I'd like to do is kind of put this together

331
00:30:28,540 --> 00:30:34,500
 like we do particularly for our council agenda items is develop a matrix for the meetings

332
00:30:34,500 --> 00:30:39,720
 and then kind of talk about, oh, good, I see clapping. That makes me happy. Develop a matrix

333
00:30:39,720 --> 00:30:44,480
 that kind of talks through ultimately from a timing perspective. If we were to talk about

334
00:30:44,480 --> 00:30:48,720
 something today, unless it's something we're already currently having the cure we're working

335
00:30:48,720 --> 00:30:53,680
 on, the likelihood of us being able to bring it back to the next meeting may be slim to

336
00:30:53,680 --> 00:30:57,800
 none. And so I just want to be realistic about the fact that if it's something that we're

337
00:30:57,800 --> 00:31:01,960
 currently programmed or certainly something we're currently working on, we're happy to

338
00:31:01,960 --> 00:31:06,840
 bring it back as soon as possible. But more than likely if it's a new topic, it may take

339
00:31:06,840 --> 00:31:13,120
 us a month or two. And so I'd like to have that program appropriately so that you're

340
00:31:13,120 --> 00:31:17,400
 understanding and open to when that feedback might come back. And then something I'd like

341
00:31:17,400 --> 00:31:23,360
 to continue to include in each one of the, you know, kind of staff or agenda item updates

342
00:31:23,360 --> 00:31:28,360
 is kind of that overall I'm an organized person and like to schedule things. So I think that

343
00:31:28,360 --> 00:31:33,240
 will help all of us. So if there's particular topics, Becky and I would also would love

344
00:31:33,240 --> 00:31:37,360
 to hear. I know Chandra is listening ears because he knows that means work for him.

345
00:31:37,360 --> 00:31:42,280
 And so if there's anything, I'll be quiet and kind of let y'all go through and talk

346
00:31:42,280 --> 00:31:47,080
 to us about particular topics that you see that are interested or that you're interested

347
00:31:47,080 --> 00:31:51,880
 in us bringing forward. Well, if I can say something real quick about the process, I'd

348
00:31:51,880 --> 00:31:55,120
 like to thank you, Becky, for saying that because that was what I was going to bring

349
00:31:55,120 --> 00:31:59,880
 up. You know, I always hope that this committee makes a difference in bringing up concerns.

350
00:31:59,880 --> 00:32:04,440
 A lot of us are are very active as walkers and bikers in the community. And so we bring

351
00:32:04,440 --> 00:32:08,600
 up issues. And I've been concerned like the last probably two years, we used to have a

352
00:32:08,600 --> 00:32:12,000
 matrix where we would always get an update, just, hey, this is something we can't address

353
00:32:12,000 --> 00:32:15,800
 or hey, and that's kind of fallen off. And we make requests and they're just never brought

354
00:32:15,800 --> 00:32:21,840
 back to us. And so I really appreciate having a matrix. And if I can give you just one example,

355
00:32:21,840 --> 00:32:26,680
 in our November meeting, and this is a request I've been making for five years, I've probably

356
00:32:26,680 --> 00:32:32,240
 made it about four or five times. I've asked, can we get an update on city policy on on

357
00:32:32,240 --> 00:32:37,760
 when there's construction on a street about where construction signs go? Because currently,

358
00:32:37,760 --> 00:32:45,440
 it seems like city policy is to block access to sidewalks and an ADA ramps with construction

359
00:32:45,440 --> 00:32:50,560
 signs, oftentimes saying one of the two or three lanes is closed. Right. So the street

360
00:32:50,560 --> 00:32:55,800
 is still accessible. So I made that request in November. In those four months, since then

361
00:32:55,800 --> 00:33:02,160
 the city has put up at least by my count, I've seen 15 signs that block access on sidewalks

362
00:33:02,160 --> 00:33:06,720
 during that time. So it just like that request has been made many times on this committee.

363
00:33:06,720 --> 00:33:11,240
 So I'm hoping that a matrix will at least allow us to understand what's going on, because

364
00:33:11,240 --> 00:33:15,280
 we never have gotten an update on that issue. And it's been requested many times. And so

365
00:33:15,280 --> 00:33:19,040
 that's why I was requesting it, because I'm just, you know, concerned about our citizens

366
00:33:19,040 --> 00:33:24,880
 who are wheelchairs are citizens who are using baby strollers or or elderly who would stepping

367
00:33:24,880 --> 00:33:28,800
 off could easily trip or things. So so these issues are just really important. And I think

368
00:33:28,800 --> 00:33:33,480
 this we have a great committee of people. And so if we have if we bring the matrix back,

369
00:33:33,480 --> 00:33:39,180
 I hope that we can at least just get updates about what steps are involved in getting updates

370
00:33:39,180 --> 00:33:42,860
 on things like that. So thank you, Becky, for bringing that up. And that would be my

371
00:33:42,860 --> 00:33:49,480
 first issue is what is the city policy for where they put road construction signs? Sure,

372
00:33:49,480 --> 00:33:54,540
 no, thank you. I appreciate that very much. And I apologize, I'm typing while we're also

373
00:33:54,540 --> 00:34:00,160
 actively listening. So I'm making myself a list. So do know that I am listening. I'm

374
00:34:00,160 --> 00:34:03,720
 just not completely looking at the screen in many cases, I want to make sure that if

375
00:34:03,720 --> 00:34:08,000
 there's anything that we can bring back sooner rather than later, we're prioritizing those

376
00:34:08,000 --> 00:34:13,560
 things. So I appreciate that feedback. And I think the you know, the policy kind of talking

377
00:34:13,560 --> 00:34:17,360
 about where can city construction signs go is something that definitely is not going

378
00:34:17,360 --> 00:34:21,560
 to be, you know, a large task to bring back. So no problem. And I appreciate you bringing

379
00:34:21,560 --> 00:34:25,560
 that up. I I'm sorry that that hasn't been brought back to you yet. But we will do our

380
00:34:25,560 --> 00:34:29,960
 best to make sure that we're answering your request. Thank you, Becky. I've got a I've

381
00:34:29,960 --> 00:34:33,760
 got a couple other items, but I'll turn it over to other people first. Do other people

382
00:34:33,760 --> 00:34:38,440
 have items that they would would they would like to see reports on? These could be previously

383
00:34:38,440 --> 00:34:46,920
 discussed items that maybe have kind of fallen off our agenda. Commissioner Thurman? Yes,

384
00:34:46,920 --> 00:34:54,560
 I had an item on the matrix about bike boxes, putting a bike box to give bikes a head start

385
00:34:54,560 --> 00:35:04,320
 out in front of traffic. And my first suggestion was at Oak and Locust, right there by recycled

386
00:35:04,320 --> 00:35:10,840
 books, because the bikes are going uphill, the lane ends right there. And if the bikes

387
00:35:10,840 --> 00:35:18,080
 could have the space to move to the front of the lane with that bike box, and this is

388
00:35:18,080 --> 00:35:22,360
 a good point to I know it's a little bit of a difficult area, because there is quite a

389
00:35:22,360 --> 00:35:29,840
 slope there. But this is a good way to introduce the concept of bike boxes to our citizens

390
00:35:29,840 --> 00:35:34,040
 in general, because that's a very high trafficked area. And then when we start putting these

391
00:35:34,040 --> 00:35:42,840
 in some other areas, like particularly down around UNT, in places like that, that could

392
00:35:42,840 --> 00:35:50,120
 get them used to that. I added it to the list. Thank you for bringing it up. Thank you.

393
00:35:52,360 --> 00:36:00,360
 Are there commissioners King or Carr, do you have any items you'd like to bring up? Commissioner

394
00:36:00,360 --> 00:36:08,680
 King? I'm good. Okay. Commissioner Carr? I don't have anything specific, but I would

395
00:36:08,680 --> 00:36:12,680
 like to say I'm appreciative that they're moving forward with the senior planner for

396
00:36:12,680 --> 00:36:22,880
 the bike ped coordinator position. And as a bike commuter, I really am interested in

397
00:36:22,880 --> 00:36:30,520
 how the city is making biking more accessible for folks who don't want to ride on the street,

398
00:36:30,520 --> 00:36:42,660
 who prefer to have a lane specific for bikes. Thank you. No problem. Thank you.

399
00:36:42,660 --> 00:36:48,280
 And if there's not other issues, I have two minor issues. And again, these are ones that

400
00:36:48,280 --> 00:36:52,480
 as you all are able to respond to them, I understand if it's not the next meeting, these

401
00:36:52,480 --> 00:36:56,040
 are ones I brought up in the November meeting. So I'll just bring them up again. One is I'm

402
00:36:56,040 --> 00:37:01,120
 just very curious about the city's position on the feasibility of a common speed limit

403
00:37:01,120 --> 00:37:06,680
 in the downtown area. I don't know what the exact parameters would that be, but some cities

404
00:37:06,680 --> 00:37:11,800
 have gone to common speed limits as a way to give drivers a lot of clarity about that

405
00:37:11,800 --> 00:37:16,240
 they're entering a new area with more and with more pedestrians. And so is that something

406
00:37:16,240 --> 00:37:19,640
 that's feasible? Maybe it is, maybe it isn't, but I would love to hear the city's opinion

407
00:37:19,640 --> 00:37:26,880
 on that. And then the other one was just a specific or a too specific, just I had a question

408
00:37:26,880 --> 00:37:32,240
 about decisions that had already been made just to understand how those are made. One

409
00:37:32,240 --> 00:37:38,920
 is on on Locust Street right next to Barley and board. If you know where that is, they

410
00:37:38,920 --> 00:37:44,480
 put in a new sidewalk and ramp there. And when they completed it, it didn't have a crosswalk

411
00:37:44,480 --> 00:37:49,320
 at that street. Does anybody know what that alley is right off? It's just it's parallel

412
00:37:49,320 --> 00:37:55,840
 to Oak. If you're going north on, you know, towards T.W.U. on Locust. And I was really

413
00:37:55,840 --> 00:38:01,920
 curious why in a pedestrian heavy area, a street wouldn't have a crosswalk. And that's

414
00:38:01,920 --> 00:38:05,240
 a this, you know, when they did, they've already designed it and done it, but it was clearly

415
00:38:05,240 --> 00:38:09,640
 designed that walkers were because the ramp doesn't even face like have an outlet to the

416
00:38:09,640 --> 00:38:12,680
 right. It just faces like you're supposed to keep going straight. I didn't understand

417
00:38:12,680 --> 00:38:16,880
 why that happened. So I was curious just if someone could just explain it to us. And that

418
00:38:16,880 --> 00:38:22,160
 may be a text decision that's out of our control because it's on Locust. So I was curious about

419
00:38:22,160 --> 00:38:33,520
 that one. And then the the other one is the city at Bolivar and McKinney. There is a faded

420
00:38:33,520 --> 00:38:41,000
 crosswalk there. It is a spot, I think, that some people cross. My understanding and I

421
00:38:41,000 --> 00:38:44,880
 know this because my wife almost got hit by a car there. And so she put it in for the

422
00:38:44,880 --> 00:38:50,200
 city report and they apologize to her and said, sorry, we meant to we are trying to

423
00:38:50,200 --> 00:38:56,920
 get rid of that crosswalk. And so my question is why what's why at McKinney and Bolivar

424
00:38:56,920 --> 00:39:00,440
 are we getting rid of the crosswalk instead of I think what they have to do is fix the

425
00:39:00,440 --> 00:39:04,920
 the infrastructure on the curb stop curb cuts. And I don't think they currently have that.

426
00:39:04,920 --> 00:39:07,920
 So those were just two ones I had brought up previously. I'd love to just understand

427
00:39:07,920 --> 00:39:15,000
 those decisions and whether those are things they're still considering. That's it. That's

428
00:39:15,000 --> 00:39:22,920
 all I have. Great. Well, I appreciate all the feedback. Thank you for giving me the

429
00:39:22,920 --> 00:39:28,200
 opportunity to listen to you and and some of the questions and concerns that you have.

430
00:39:28,200 --> 00:39:33,240
 And we look forward to producing this matrix. I think really in general to the other thing

431
00:39:33,240 --> 00:39:38,720
 that we'll be bringing forward is anything related to projects that are going on. You

432
00:39:38,720 --> 00:39:43,600
 may start to see some of the capital projects that the team is delivering and be brought

433
00:39:43,600 --> 00:39:47,800
 forward and some of the other initiatives that the traffic engineering group is doing.

434
00:39:47,800 --> 00:39:51,820
 So there may be some things that maybe aren't things you were asking about, but things we

435
00:39:51,820 --> 00:39:56,800
 want you to be aware of. So we look forward to bringing those forward to you. So I do

436
00:39:56,800 --> 00:40:02,200
 appreciate your time and thank you for giving me the opportunity to listen and really work

437
00:40:02,200 --> 00:40:07,640
 on developing this matrix that I think will help all of us. So I appreciate it. And that's

438
00:40:07,640 --> 00:40:12,240
 really all I have for today's report. So I'll turn it back over to you, Commissioner. Thank

439
00:40:12,240 --> 00:40:18,000
 you. I'm sorry. Yes. Yes. Thank you, Becky. I actually I feel like that was very productive

440
00:40:18,000 --> 00:40:22,400
 and I appreciate the work you're doing and in helping us get organized and continue to

441
00:40:22,400 --> 00:40:28,400
 learn about the projects. And with that item, we do not have any further items. Does anybody

442
00:40:28,400 --> 00:40:37,720
 have any new business or things they would like to have for future meetings? Okay. With

443
00:40:37,720 --> 00:40:43,400
 no further business for today, the meeting is do we we don't need to we can just adjourn

444
00:40:43,400 --> 00:40:47,000
 the meeting. We don't need to do a vote, do we? I'm trying to correct. That's correct.

445
00:40:47,000 --> 00:40:50,920
 I thought that was the case. Okay. Thank you for trying. Thank you for keeping me on on

446
00:40:50,920 --> 00:40:56,480
 Robert's rules today. And no further business. The meeting is adjourned. Bye bye.